Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Cook County state’s attorney asks state labor board to dismiss employee unionization petition
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Cook County state’s attorney asks state labor board to dismiss employee unionization petition

Monday, Apr 7, 2025 - Posted by Rich Miller

* From the 2024 campaign

* The state’s attorney has now filed this response to the unionization attempt with the Illinois Labor Relations Board

The Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office (“Employer” or “CCSAO”) submits this response in the above majority interest representation petition, objecting to recognition of the unit of employees the International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 700 (“Union”) seeks to represent. The petitioned-for employees are, as a matter of law, subject to the managerial exclusion under the Illinois Public Labor Relations Act (“Act”) and are not public employees entitled to representation. Office of the Cook County State’s Attorney v. Illinois Local Labor Relations Board, 166 Ill. 2d 296, 652 N.E. 2d 301, 1995 Ill. LEXIS 95, 209 Ill. Dec. 761 (1995)(“State’s Attorney Case”) The petition should be dismissed in its entirety. […]

All ASAs are, as a matter of law, subject to the managerial exclusion under the Illinois Labor Relations Act (“Act”) and are not public employees entitled to representation. The Workers’ Rights Amendment passed in 2022 does not upend ASAs legal status as supervisors. In addition, certain ASAs have supervisory and/or confidential job duties that exclude them from the coverage of the Act. […]

For the reasons set forth above, the Employer requests that the Union’s petition to represent all ASAs be dismissed in its entirety because, under controlling Illinois Supreme Court precedent, all the petitioned-for employees are managerial as a matter of law, or, in the alternative, that Supervisory ASAs be excluded from the certified bargaining unit represented by the Union because they are subject to the supervisory and confidential exclusions under the Act.

Explanation

A majority interest petition is a board generated form filed by a union seeking certification as the exclusive bargaining representatives for a unit of employees, not through an election but through the Board’s card check procedures.

Card check is simply another name to describe the majority interest procedures, whereby a union may be certified as the exclusive bargaining representative, if a majority of employees sign cards (or other evidence) indicating their desire to be represented by the union. The Board checks the cards to determine majority showing of interest. Upon a satisfactory determination, the Board issues the certification.

* The Illinois State’s Attorney Association filed in opposition to HB2973, which removes some of the managerial designation from assistant state’s attorneys. But State’s Attorney O’Neill Burke’s office did not file a witness slip. That amended bill is now on 2nd Reading in the House.

* I asked for an explanation…

Hey Rich, this is a procedural filing that reflects the relevant caselaw. I’d refer you to our previous statement, which is: 

“State’s Attorney Burke supports organized labor and the right of workers to collectively bargain, including ASAs once Illinois law allows for it. Decades of binding case law must be addressed for that to happen, however, and as the county’s chief law enforcement officer and a former judge, she has taken an oath repeatedly to uphold the law. Our office looks forward to working with the appropriate stakeholders to get this right.” — Matt McGrath, CCSAO spokesman

       

14 Comments »
  1. - Prairie Dude - Monday, Apr 7, 25 @ 9:47 am:

    Hypocrisy, plain and simple, and misleading. She does not have to wait on any such law change to recognize the ASA’s union. She was all for it during her campaign when she wanted votes and campaign cash.


  2. - Flyin' Elvis'-Utah Chapter - Monday, Apr 7, 25 @ 9:57 am:

    Why won’t a lawyer run over a snake?

    Professional courtesy.


  3. - Three Dimensional Checkers - Monday, Apr 7, 25 @ 10:07 am:

    That’s some nice gaslighting there, but I’m pretty sure filing a response citing the case that says ASAs cannot form a union means you oppose them forming a union.


  4. - City Zen - Monday, Apr 7, 25 @ 10:17 am:

    You wanted the Workers Rights Amendment, you got the Workers Rights Amendment.


  5. - John Candy and Nuts - Monday, Apr 7, 25 @ 10:47 am:

    Democrats wonder why labor, despite Trump and GOPers blatant stances, remains skeptical of their labor leanings. Dems love the photo ops and big checks for election time, but then turn into “the boss” as soon as they are elected.

    If Republicans in Illinois started being pro-labor, the Democratic party would no longer have super majorities in this state, and possibly not every constitutional statewide position.

    Until then, labor continues to suffer these indignities from Dems.


  6. - Retired School Board Member - Monday, Apr 7, 25 @ 10:48 am:

    So, I guess the question is did she not know about these laws when she made that campaign statement, thereby rendering inept or…. she knew full well what she was doing and is proving to be a liar. Neither bodes well for Cook County. If only the General Assembly was willing to take a stand for workers and the collective bargaining process, oh, wait….


  7. - Retired School Board Member - Monday, Apr 7, 25 @ 10:49 am:

    BTW- it’s not a serious question. Of course she knew.


  8. - Remember the Alamo II - Monday, Apr 7, 25 @ 11:21 am:

    The State’s Attorney is not wrong with her assessment of the law - that does not change the fact that she is taking a position contrary to her campaign promise. She will have to work that out with her backers in labor.


  9. - Not So Innocent Bystander - Monday, Apr 7, 25 @ 11:32 am:

    The Illinois Constitution expresly provides that “No law shall be passed that
    interferes with, negates, or diminishes the right of
    employees to organize and bargain collectively over their
    wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment
    and work place safety.” I thought she took an oath to support the constitution?


  10. - Three Dimensional Checkers - Monday, Apr 7, 25 @ 11:51 am:

    ===She will have to work that out with her backers in labor.===

    How about the ASAs that signed the cards, and now have the rug pulled out from under them?


  11. - Amalia - Monday, Apr 7, 25 @ 11:54 am:

    what mcgrath said.


  12. - Huh? - Monday, Apr 7, 25 @ 11:59 am:

    “Why won’t a lawyer run over a snake?”

    I read an article years ago about drivers and roadkill. For the most part, drivers would avoid running over roadkill, with the exception of snakes. The article said that drivers would intentionally steer to drivers over a snake. The study documented 1 driver that not only drove over the snake, they stopped, backed over the snake, and drove forward over the snake a second time.


  13. - Donnie Elgin - Monday, Apr 7, 25 @ 12:22 pm:

    =that does not change the fact that she is taking a position contrary to her campaign promise=

    Campaign promises are like candy at a parade - give some out to everyone - but when it comes to how politicians govern or administer, that’s a whole different story. The question is, will this create an accountability problem that lasts until her re-election?


  14. - Sue - Monday, Apr 7, 25 @ 12:25 pm:

    To be subject to union membership you need to meet the statutory defn of “employee” - the Constitutional amendment does not expand upon that definition- Burke whether she reneged on a
    campaign promise is correct on the law- you need a legislative fix unless she agrees to voluntary recognition


TrackBack URI

Anonymous commenters, uncivil comments, rumor-mongering and profanity of any kind will be deleted.



* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* Powering Illinois' Energy And Economic Future
* It’s just a bill
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY: Charles Koch, Leonard Leo and... Kwame Raoul? (Updated)
* RETAIL: Strengthening Communities Across Illinois
* Cook County state's attorney asks state labor board to dismiss employee unionization petition
* Behind the 'complete wipeout' in DuPage and what's to come
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition and today's quotable
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Live coverage
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
April 2025
March 2025
February 2025
January 2025
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller