Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » It’s just a bill
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
It’s just a bill

Friday, Jun 27, 2025 - Posted by Isabel Miller

* During spring session, the House failed to pass one of Governor Pritzker’s priorities that would restricted the use of cellphones in classrooms. IPM Newsroom

Under Senate Bill 2427, each school district would create their own policy for banning cell phones in class by the start of the 2026 school year.

“In conversations with educators from around the state, there is one thing most commonly cited as an impediment to classroom learning: cell phones,” Pritzker said.

Pritzker cited a study from the Pew Research Center that found 72 percent of high school teachers say cell phones are a major problem in their classrooms.

Pritzker said students would be allowed to use smartphones in the classroom in certain circumstances, like if a student monitors a medical condition with their phone.

* Earlier this month, the Tribune took a closer look at why the bill didn’t pass

A coalition of Illinois House lawmakers blocked the [cellphone ban] measure when it came to the House late in the session over concerns about unequal disciplinary impacts, according to bill sponsor, Democratic state Rep. Michelle Mussman of Schaumburg.

Concerns about enforcement disproportionately affecting Black and brown students became more pronounced as lawmakers reviewed the phone restriction alongside another bill limiting police from ticketing students for minor misbehavior, according to Mussman. Legislators were hesitant to pass a statewide school mandate while also debating a measure meant to scale back school discipline practices, she said.

Rep. Curtis Tarver, a Chicago Democrat and a member of the Black caucus, told the Tribune in February he worried about the “unintended consequences” of a phone ban, including inequitable enforcement. […]

In the end, negotiations around the measure came down to a “dance” between ensuring local school boards had control over their own policies while also protecting students from “inequitably applied” policies, Mussman said. Moreover, representatives were unsure how to implement guidance on “how a phone might be returned if it was confiscated, or what to do if anything was lost or broken,” she added.

* Even so, Chalkbeat Chicago’s Samantha Smylie reported this week that sponsors say the bill isn’t completely dead

State Sen. Cristina Castro, the chief sponsor of the bill, said in an interview with Chalkbeat that she did not hear strong opposition to the bill, but believes the language of the bill needed some “fine-tuning.” […]

Bryen Johnson, director of political activities for the Illinois Federation of Teachers, one of the largest unions in the state, said the union generally supports the idea of removing cellphones from classrooms so students can remain focused on their lessons. But the union did not file a witness slip in support of the bill because of unanswered questions, including one regarding liability. […]

State Rep. Michelle Mussman, a House sponsor of the bill and chair of the House’s education policy committee, said in an email to Chalkbeat that lawmakers brought up several concerns such as access to phones in an emergency situation, who would be responsible if a phone was stolen or broken, and enforcement of a policy and whether it would be disproportionately applied to students of color.

Mussman said negotiations over the bill will continue over the summer. Castro says that she and Mussman are committed to getting the bill over the finish line. The bill could return during the fall veto session.

Thoughts?

       

12 Comments »
  1. - Amalia - Friday, Jun 27, 25 @ 10:07 am:

    wonder how a cellphone ban would be taken by some parents. USSupCt just said parents can opt kids out of LGBT classroom instruction


  2. - Perrid - Friday, Jun 27, 25 @ 10:17 am:

    I don’t see why it needs a statewide ban. Each school should have a policy that, at minimum, students can’t use it during class. That really should not be a question. The whole point kids are there is to learn, which you do by paying attention and working. You can’t do that if you’re texting or scrolling. I’m not really against a statewide law, but it boggles the mind that it’s necessary.

    Schools and teachers absolutely have the authority to tell kids to put their phones away or face disciplinary action, the same as any other misbehavior. That is and should be completely separate from calling the police, the two are not and should not be conflated by anyone with a brain.


  3. - 32nd Ward Roscoe Village - Friday, Jun 27, 25 @ 10:28 am:

    It would help teachers to remove one thing they don’t have to spend classtime disciplining over. Phone bans in schools have been shown to work to help increase learning. My kids went to a private school (I know this is not an option for many) which had a cell phone ban K through 8 (they didn’t attend that high school) and it was wonderful to all concerned.


  4. - Yooper in Diaspora - Friday, Jun 27, 25 @ 10:34 am:

    It would be worth seeing how other states are addressing concerns about liability and inequitable disciplinary action. Asking someone to put away a phone is something I try to do in college classrooms, but from committee meetings to family gatherings, it now looks more rude to be reading a book than to be on one’s phone (or computer) when sitting among other people. That said, requiring students to not have cell phones present does help create a habit of knowing what it is like to navigate time and learning apart from the ability to be on the phone so often, so I strongly support the bill.


  5. - Steve - Friday, Jun 27, 25 @ 10:48 am:

    - he worried about the “unintended consequences” of a phone ban, including inequitable enforcement. -

    It’s hard to believe that members of Illinois Federation of Teachers or IEA would discriminate against non-white students. MAGA members don’t control the government schools in Illinois. The cell phone ban is a great idea, no wonder other states are adopting it.


  6. - M - Friday, Jun 27, 25 @ 11:16 am:

    As a current middle school teacher, I am ridiculously frustrated that this has stalled. The amount of time and energy spent on enforcing phone policies is ridiculous. 90% of my students have phones out and are actively on them at some point in my class and my school has a “no phones” policy. I can ask them to put it away and most do but 2 minutes later it is back and out. The number of phone calls I have to make home about phones and usually the response is “I’ll talk to them.” And nothing changes.

    Period—most schools have a policy but it is ineffective. Kids get more dopamine from phones than they do learning. I can be dancing at the front of the room but it will not beat the instant gratification that comes from their phone. I hate that it is necessary too but that is the moment we are in.

    CUSD 300 is currently waiting on the results of a research study they conducted with all groups (students, staff, parents, and community). They gave an update at one of the last board meetings but the results were not ready yet.


  7. - Pundent - Friday, Jun 27, 25 @ 11:35 am:

    I agree that cellphones are a major distraction. But I’m not sure that waiting for the legislature to solve the problem is the answer. The teachers at my kids high school effectively police it but I would admit they are inconsistent. But that seems to be a problem for the administration to solve not the state.


  8. - The Farm Grad - Friday, Jun 27, 25 @ 11:41 am:

    M - Friday, how would you feel about an AI interface that you’d wear during class, and would enable you to better engage your students?

    (i do agree with you regarding phones in classrooms. in fact, in silicon valley, many exclusive schools ban computers in grades k-8)


  9. - Rich Miller - Friday, Jun 27, 25 @ 11:46 am:

    ===would enable you to better engage===

    lol

    wut


  10. - Pundent - Friday, Jun 27, 25 @ 11:56 am:

    =in silicon valley, many exclusive schools ban computers in grades k-8=

    Yes and ironically that’s where many of the tech bros are sending their kids. But they tend to be a bit nutty.


  11. - Friendly Bob Adams - Friday, Jun 27, 25 @ 11:56 am:

    Banning phones in classrooms is the best answer. The specific law or regulation doesn’t matter much.

    I have relatives that are high school teachers and they report the phone situation is a nightmare.


  12. - Really? - Friday, Jun 27, 25 @ 12:17 pm:

    Students using their phones in class is absurd. Hard no to that concept. Next.


TrackBack URI

Anonymous commenters, uncivil comments, rumor-mongering, disinformation and profanity of any kind will be deleted.

(required)

(not required)



* Question of the day
* Today's must-read
* Last year's Administrative Procedure Act opinion appears to remain intact after today's Supreme Court ruling (Updated x2)
* Why Are Tax-Exempt Hospitals Getting Rich?
* It’s just a bill
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Live coverage
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
June 2025
May 2025
April 2025
March 2025
February 2025
January 2025
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller