* The decision is here. The SCOTUSblog story is here. More background is here. And here’s Attorney General Raoul…
Attorney General Kwame Raoul today issued the following statement after the U.S. Supreme Court rejected the president’s unprecedented and unlawful use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Raoul and a coalition of attorneys general had previously sued to stop the arbitrary use of tariffs. “President Trump’s unlawful tariffs on international trade have harmed so many in our state, including families struggling to make ends meet, small business owners, farmers and manufacturers.
“Tariffs are a tax on Americans, and these illegal tariffs threatened Illinois’ economy and have harmed taxpayers by increasing costs to the state and local governments. For example, the Illinois Department of Transportation alone estimated that over two years, the state’s costs for transportation projects would have been $249 million to $585 million higher due to tariffs. Due to our successful lawsuit, increased costs to the state in construction projects, technology and other expenses can also be mitigated.
“Since the International Emergency Economic Powers Act was enacted in 1977, no prior president has attempted to use the extraordinary power to unilaterally impose tariffs of unlimited amount, duration and scope to implement sweeping, arbitrary tariffs. The Supreme Court rightly determined that the act does not grant the president ‘the extraordinary power to unilaterally impose tariffs of unlimited amount, duration, and scope.’
“Today’s ruling makes clear that we are not a nation governed by royal decree. The rule of law matters, and I will continue to fight to protect Illinoisians from the economic costs of the Trump administration’s unlawful actions.”
In April 2025, Raoul and 11 other attorneys general filed a lawsuit to halt the implementation of the illegal tariffs. In their complaint, Raoul and the attorneys general argued that the authority to lay and collect taxes and duties on imported goods lies with Congress. The lower courts ruled in favor of the states, explaining that President Trump’s attempt to implement sweeping tariffs exceeded the authority delegated to him by Congress.
Raoul was joined in filing the lawsuit by the attorneys general of Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, Oregon and Vermont.
- Sue - Friday, Feb 20, 26 @ 11:24 am:
Was not a fan of how the President enacted tariffs but 300 plus billion in revenue certainly was a help for the deficit without raising taxes- Dems always want more revenue and tariffs certainly did that
- Rich Miller - Friday, Feb 20, 26 @ 11:28 am:
===without raising taxes===
Tariffs *are* taxes.
- don the legend - Friday, Feb 20, 26 @ 11:33 am:
Sue, now the scammer in chief has to pay your so called tax free revenue back to the businesses, according to you, he never taxed.
- Flyin' Elvis'-Utah Chapter - Friday, Feb 20, 26 @ 11:43 am:
“300 plus billion in revenue certainly was a help for the deficit without raising taxes”
“The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.”-
Winston Churchill
- low level - Friday, Feb 20, 26 @ 11:44 am:
Sue shows us yet again MAGAs know nothing about economics. Its incredible what has happened to conservatives. They were once guided by Milton Friedman have now returned to Herbert Hoover like protectionism. We saw how well that went in 1929. It failed spectacularly.
- Epic Fail - Friday, Feb 20, 26 @ 11:50 am:
I guess Royal Decrees are only good when they’re used to run a state for 3 years.
- Ducky LaMoore - Friday, Feb 20, 26 @ 11:52 am:
“I guess Royal Decrees are only good when they’re used to run a state for 3 years.”
I guess you only find the judicial branch necessary when they agree with you.
- Jerty - Friday, Feb 20, 26 @ 12:26 pm:
Thank you Rich. Taxes increased massively this year. So have prices.