* Gov. Pat Quinn talked to reporters after this morning’s prayer breakfast. He was asked what he’d done since the House and Senate adjourned on Friday, but dodged the question.
Quinn said he didn’t foresee giving up any of the emergency powers granted to him in a bill passed by the Senate, but which is still sitting idle in the House. He also hinted at special sessions: “When the legislature wants to drift off and not focus on doing important things for the people, the governor has to call them back and make sure they do their duty… That’s what I plan to do every day this month until we get a good budget.”
Gov. Quinn also spoke about his veto of the legislative scholarship program: “The government is not about politicians, it’s about the people.”
Borrowing: “Every state in the union does this… [Sen. Brady] doesn’t have a plan at all… Sen. Brady runs around and tries to foment as much discord as he can. That’s going back to the past. That’s going back to George Ryan and Rod Blagojevich… We’re not going to have a lot of fakery before the election, where people run around and say they have a secret plan to cut the budget [and] they never give you any details.”
Quinn must’ve said “We’re not going back to the days of Ryan and Blagojevich” or a version of that a half dozen times, ironically echoing his opponent Bill Brady.
The state’s budget meltdown did not prevent the wives of two Democratic lawmakers from landing six-figure state paychecks thanks to Gov. Quinn and the Illinois Senate.
The spouse of Rep. Michael Zalewski (D-Chicago) nearly doubled her state salary when Quinn named her to a $117,043-a-year spot on the Illinois Pollution Control Board.
The governor also appointed the wife of state Sen. Jeff Schoenberg (D-Evanston) to another term as chairwoman of the Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board, a position that will pay her $104,358 annually.
“Carrie Zalewski and Lynne Sered are qualified individuals whose experience and professionalism made them the best candidates available,” Quinn spokeswoman Annie Thompson said.
This actually first surfaced in February, when Sen. Dan Duffy (R-Lake Barrington) first rose to criticize their appointments. We even had a Question of the Day on the issue back then.
Duffy used the issue to raise money in a March 26th fundraising letter (complete with the State Seal) and he was called on it the other day, so the Sun-Times used it as an excuse to dredge this issue up all over again.
* Related and a roundup…
* Is Illinois’ Medicaid System Really “One Of The Worst”?
* Frankfort couple learn hard, cold ways of Springfield
* Brady pays ‘courtesy call’ to Daley about budget issues
Prosecutors argued and Zagel agreed that Blagojevich’s defense attorneys should not be allowed to mention the “honest services” charges against their client in their opening remarks to the jury.
Why not?
Well, just in case the U.S. Supreme Court decides it’s unconstitutional.
Huh? […]
Charge Blago but don’t tell the jury what all the charges are? Just in case?
Also on trial with our former governor is his brother, Robert Blagojevich. His attorney, Michael Ettinger, reasonably asks why there can’t be a small delay until the Supreme Court rules.
“What’s 30 days?” Ettinger says. “What’s the difference.”
If the government doesn’t want the delay, the cost of going forward should be to drop the honest services fraud charges. And go with the rest of its newly redrafted case.
Congress has eroded federal defendants’ rights to almost nothing over the years. This move is just plain unfair, even if I believe Blagojevich’s punishment should be tar and feathers and then 50 years in a super-max.
As of June 30, 2009, there were 71,665 children enrolled, 75 percent of which - 54,073 - were classified as undocumented immigrants, auditors found, though they cautioned mistakes in state All Kids data suggest the number is inflated. Of the nearly $79.1 million in claims paid under the program, nearly $55 million were for undocumented immigrants. The program took in just $8.9 million in premiums.
The numbers counter past claims by the state’s main health care agency. In 2008, a spokeswoman for the Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services declined repeatedly to provide the Daily Herald with information regarding undocumented enrollees. Asked why, she said the issue was a “political football” and, “At the end of the day it’s a minuscule number of participants that’s undocumented.”
The new head of the Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services agreed problems exist and would be fixed. […]
At times the audit encapsulated some of the broader, big picture criticism of state government and its lack of spending accountability. For instance, auditors requested 100 case files and in reviewing 98 of them could find no routine process used to verify All Kids enrollees lived in Illinois. Auditors said the other two case files were unavailable because the health care departments couldn’t find one and the other was “inaccessible due to mold.”
* More Oversight on All Kids Could Save State Money: Illinois could save money by increasing oversight in a statewide children’s health insurance program.
* As I’ve pointed out before, if Mark Kirk really does have votes planned in the US House tonight, then that’s a pretty good excuse to skip out on the Sarah Palin event…
Palin is in suburban Chicago Wednesday for a conservative radio talk show event at the Rosemont Theatre and a $500-a-plate fundraiser at the Westin O’Hare for the Illinois Republican Party. The fundraiser isn’t open press, but that still didn’t entice the state’s top GOP contenders to attend.
Kirk, who’s running for Senate, “says he will have to be in Washington, D.C., tonight to make some planned House votes,” according to the Arlington Heights Daily Herald. And House candidates Randy Hultgren and Robert Dold “have other plans tonight.”
That left just gubernatorial candidate Bill Brady to attend, and he “originally” didn’t plan on it.
The House did have some votes on minor legislation last night and Kirk was a no-show, one of anywhere from 35 to 42 who didn’t make it for four votes. Now that kinda undermines his excuse. Again, though, those were pretty minor bills.
Even so, Alexi Giannoulias’ campaign is trying to make some hay out of Palin’s visit with a new Internet ad…
We admit to being a little unsure about how to characterize your appearance. The GOP fundraiser portion is self-explanatory, but when it comes to the Rosemont Theatre event, is that a personal lecture? A political rally? Promotional materials for the show have called it just “An Evening with Sarah Palin,” so we’ll take it at that and see what develops over time.
Nevertheless, inasmuch as you are often hailed as a potential presidential candidate, we think it worthwhile to reflect on some topics we hope you’ll address that can help us in the suburbs better get to know you.
For one, we’re naturally interested in your thoughts about media’s relationship to political and public figures. Your Rosemont Theatre address is promised to be free of “media or liberal filters.” Yet, you are sponsored by a radio station that bills itself as “Chicago’s conservative talk radio station.” Is that not a media filter? And, if reports of your speech are run through politically moderate or conservative filters, is that OK?
* Bill Brady will be there tonight after originally saying he wouldn’t and he talked out of both sides of his mouth to Chicago Public Radio…
BRADY: Sarah Palin certainly appeals to some people, and doesn’t appeal to some others… I just appreciate the fact she’s willing to come in and help raise money for Republican candidates.
* Kind of a small peg to hang this hit on, but whatever. From a press release…
Democratic nominee for Illinois Treasurer Robin Kelly is calling on opponent Dan Rutherford to explain his comments regarding conservative Sarah Palin who will host a fundraiser for the state Republican Party today in Rosemont.
“Sarah Palin does not represent the beliefs of mainstream Illinois families,” said Kay Page, Kelly’s campaign manager. “The people of Illinois have a right to know if Dan Rutherford stands with Palin, or if he stands with the people of Illinois.”
On April 17th, Rutherford attended the Palin event outside of Peoria and met with her after the program. In addition, he is soliciting campaign contributions on his website in exchange for Palin buttons.
When asked about Palin, Rutherford cautiously says that she “does invigorate a certain constituency.”
“Rutherford needs to answer whether he considers himself part of the constituency that Palin energizes, and if he will seek or accept her endorsement,” said Page, noting that Palin is a frequent critic of President Obama’s policies.
Scott Lee Cohen, who is mounting an independent run for governor, has chosen a running mate: Baxter Swilley, who was Cohen’s downstate coordinator when Cohen sought the Democratic nomination for lieutenant governor.
Swilley, a Chicago resident, operated out of an office in downtown Springfield.
“As a community organizer, Baxter spent his life bringing positive change to Illinois by working for organizations including the Chicago Metropolitan YMCA and the Chicago Urban League,” John Davis, a Cohen campaign spokesman, said.
“Scott is a friend of mine and I strongly and genuinely believe in him,” Swilley said before the primary.
Apparently, there wasn’t a mad rush to join the ticket.
Swilley is a young African-American. Here he is on video talking about the failed bid to bring the Olympics to Chicago…
Sneed hears gubernatorial hopeful Scott Lee Cohen, who announces his bid today, had no success in picking a female running mate. “He was looking for a suburban mom type, but it didn’t work out,” a source said. Word is the Rev. James Meeks turned him down.
A suburban mom type. Yeah, that’s it. “The females will forgive me” Cohen was looking for a little insta-redemption. No chance.
Swilley, a native Chicagoan, was Cohen’s first choice all along, campaign spokesman John Davis said. “He was the first person Scott asked, but Baxter wanted to take a couple of weeks to think about it and when he did, he decided to come along,” Davis said.
The chief of staff to Wisconsin Lieutenant Gov. Barbara Lawton is leaving to run the election campaign for Democratic Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn.
Ben Nuckels has been Lawton’s chief of staff since February 2007. Lawton announced Nuckels’ move to the Quinn campaign on Tuesday.
Nuckels left Lawton’s office briefly last year to work on her campaign for governor. But when she dropped out of the race, Nuckels rejoined her Capitol staff.
So, Quinn waits over three months to hire a campaign manager, but he’s a young out-of-stater who hasn’t run anything in Illinois. Welcome to the bigtime, Mr. Nuckels. Good luck. You’re gonna need it.
“When there’s a job to be done, look to Illinois workers because they are second to none.”
That slogan apparently only applies to the private sector, not to campaigns.
…Adding More… This is essentially something that I pointed out to subscribers last week and brought up in comments today…
The fact is [that] Quinn is Quinns campaign manager. He does not want anyone around him to contradict his thinking. This guy is going to be asked to coordinate Quinn’s direction and he very well may be up to that limited task.
The House and Senate adjourned Friday night after it became clear that more negotiations were needed to come up with a plan that could gain approval. According to the Capital Fax newsletter, the delay is necessary so the governor can negotiate with some legislators about including pet projects in the budget.
Whatever the cause, the rank and file was told to go home for a few days, with the promise they would be called back to approve a budget.
Actually, it’s more involved than that, but thanks for the hat tip anyway. The table is being set for a deal on the worst possible budget ever, but it’ll still be more politically palatable than forcing citizens to face up to the harsh realities that deep cuts and revenues are both needed.
Maybe, possibly, potentially (one never really knows when one lives in a state controlled by Sorcerer Madigan and his apprentices, who chant vague incantations in their shrouded backrooms), [House Speaker Michael Madigan is] stalling until Republicans will be forced into the game.
It’s then, after May 31, that passing a budget would require GOP votes too, and another party would be forced to share the voters’ ire when the consequences come to light.
That would, of course, force Republican gubernatorial candidate Bill Brady to step up and declare himself and present his budget solution before voters pull the lever to elect him on some vague and generic feel-good promises.
First, the House Republicans have only one real targeted member, Rep. Reboletti. The rest of the game will be played on almost purely Democratic incumbent turf. That means the Republicans can easily afford to stay in Springfield and keep vulnerable Democrats pinned down behind their desks, instead of out walking precincts. I have yet to ever see the minority party exclusively blamed for an overtime, or for an overtime dragging itself out. So, if this thing goes past June 30th, the Republicans have no real incentive to cut a deal until, well, election day.
And I’m not sure, either, that Brady will ever get smoked out on his full budget plan. Most likely, he’ll just introduce some amendments to eliminate things like the State Board of Education, which is one of his campaign promises, but only accounts for about $27 million in personnel and operating expenditures - and all but $3 million of that is slated for running student assessment programs.
It’s a good thing Illinois legislators blew out of town on Friday without passing a state budget because the options they produced were the worst yet in what is now a seven-year fiscal debacle.
We’ve had a nasty structural deficit in this state for years, but the latest problem goes back to the 2001 recession. Nine years, not seven. George Ryan did a yeoman’s job of cutting the budget, but it wasn’t enough and ever since then they’ve been using one-off patchwork solutions to “fix” the problem. As Steve Schnorf has said before, they’ve been spending like they passed a major tax hike without ever actually passing a tax hike. Not to mention the revenue crash.
[Brady would] fill much of the existing $80-billion hole in the state’s pension plans by borrowing. The borrowing would be repaid by allotting much of the natural growth in state revenues to pension debt service, he says.
Yesterday, Gov. Pat Quinn’s campaign issued this statement about Brady’s denial that he’d ever supported a ten percent across the board budget cut when he clearly had…
“It’s important for voters to ask: Is this someone who doesn’t comprehend his own budget proposal? Or is it that Sen. Brady simply cannot recall his numerous statements about the budget over the past five months?”
Brady’s lack of comprehension appears to apply to almost all of his major budget plans: Borrowing, pension borrowing and across the board cuts. Sheesh.
* Speaking of yesterday’s kerfuffle, my intern Dan Weber broke the story yesterday that Republican gubernatorial candidate Bill Brady was contradicting himself on his previous support for a ten percent across the board state budget cut. Brady claimed during a media availability last week that he never supported an across the board cut and Dan pounced while other reporters let it go. He pressed Brady to admit that he had, in fact, supported an across the board budget cut. Brady challenged Dan to “find it on tape” and Dan did. He also found other quotes of Brady in news articles claiming that the GOP candidate did, indeed, support an across the board cut.
Well, Carol Marin led off her segment last night with Dan’s story, which she unfortunately attributed to me…
At least she got the news source right. The AP then picked it up without any attribution at all…
Bill Brady is taking issue with a politician’s comments on how to solve the state’s budget crisis. Problem is, that politician is himself.
Brady, the Republican candidate for Illinois governor, bristled last week when a reporter asked about his proposal for a 10 percent, across-the-board cut in state spending.
“I’ve never said ‘across the board.’ I’ve never said ‘across the board.’ You find it on tape,” the Bloomington state senator said.
In fact, Brady has called for “across the board” cuts on multiple occasions.
The AP is the media giant most upset with little ol’ bloggers rewriting their stories without attribution, yet here they do exactly the same thing as those hated Huffington Post aggregators, but don’t even provide a link. That’s outright theft in my book.
Republican governor candidate Bill Brady sought today to tamp down a flap over his plans for the state’s deficit-plagued budget after previously calling for 10 percent across-the-board cuts, then denying it.
“It’s how the question is framed. And I will admit it’s a matter of semantics,” Brady, a veteran state senator from Bloomington, said during an interview on WTTW-Ch. 11’s “Chicago Tonight.” “But what I simply say is that I have to reduce spending by 10 percent. No area of state government shall be (protected) from reduced spending. Pretty much it is every area.”
And the Sun-Times, which is usually good about crediting (mainly because they get to plug me as a Sun-Times columnist), said it all came from the governor’s campaign…
Quinn’s campaign wasted little time Monday digging up news clippings and a Jan. 13, 2010 video posted on Youtube.com in which Brady did just that.
The big boys really need to grow up and stop pretending that alternative media doesn’t exist and, therefore, is not deserving of any credit. I’ve dealt with this for 20 years, and now Dan is getting a little taste of it. I don’t think he’s enjoying it. Enough, already.
BRADY: I call for elimination of the State Board of Education: $80 million a year spent. … Now, I’d create a downsized department, so that we provide the necessary –
MARIN: So it wouldn’t be a total $80 million.
BRADY: No, but let’s say half — $40 million.
“Half” is not “eliminate.”
*** UPDATE 2 *** Zorn posts the entire transcript of the Chicago Tonight interview and notes how Brady twice tried to excuse his denials over ever saying he was for an across the board budget cut. Zorn’s conclusion…
Either Brady doesn’t know what “semantics” means or he’s a liar
Ouch.
* Related…
* Edgar isn’t sold on Quinn, Brady plans: Speaking of the Democratic and Republican candidates for the office he once held, former Gov. Jim Edgar said “both are right and both are wrong.” … “We are going to have to raise taxes,” Edgar said Monday night in a question-and-answer session at the McLean County Museum of History. “We have to do the cuts first and then increase taxes.” Edgar said the cuts will need to be “brutal.” “Everyone in this room is going to be mad if they are done right. It’s going to have to affect everyone.”
E-mails and other records of Dr. Eric Whitaker — one of President Obama’s best friends — have been subpoenaed by a federal grand jury, the Chicago Sun-Times has learned.
Eleven grafs down, we get this crucial bit of information…
Nothing in the subpoenas suggests Whitaker or Golden are targets of the investigation, and a spokesman for the two said they have not been subpoenaed personally or questioned by authorities.
But it’s a juicy lede, so therefore it runs.
* The Tribune editorial board must’ve swallowed hard before they ran their Sunday edit about some of the decent things the General Assembly has accomplished this session. I kid. Maybe they are starting to abandon their breathless rants. Oh. Wait. I forgot to read the lede…
They squandered months when they could have restructured state spending, dropped the ball on ethics reforms, and cruelly stymied a voucher program that would have offered hope to 30,000 kids languishing in Chicago’s worst schools. But lawmakers settled other issues in their ultimately failed rush to end their session three weeks early.
* While keeping my fingers crossed that I’m not accidentally “pulling a Brady,” I do not believe I have ever written this phrase since it is so tired and hackneyed…
This much is certain:
I checked the Google and didn’t see violations on my part, but that doesn’t cover the subscription portion.
As confirmed by multiple sources Friday afternoon – including his own office – the Illinois governor will take part Monday morning in a labor rally planned outside the LyondellBasell plant on U.S. 6. He is scheduled to speak at 10 a.m.
Last year the state eliminated the food tax break for candy and soft drinks and caught hell for it from those who thought lawmakers were playing nanny.
* Our View: State phone law set for 21st century, so long as consumers protected: Though the bill passed unanimously in the Legislature - mostly in the hope it will provide more jobs and investment - the Citizens Utility Board and the AARP remain opposed, fearing that rural parts of downstate will be left behind in favor of wiring Chicagoland, and that land-line rates will end up spiking. Indeed, the phone companies managed to get dropped a pre-existing mandate that at least 90 percent of downstate have access to broadband, though they pledge to follow through anyway since it’s arguably in their interest to build their customer base.
Friday, state Sen. Dan Kotowski, a Democrat from Park Ridge, charged on the Senate floor that [Sen. Dan Duffy, a Republican from Barrington] abused his elected powers in a different way. A letter Duffy mailed to constituents in March seeking campaign donations featured a replica of the Illinois State seal - an image Kotowski said has no business appearing in materials related to campaigns. […]
“I don’t want to give the impression that the state has sanctioned my fundraising activity,” [Kotowski] said.
Duffy said that appearance doesn’t matter, however, as state law allows conditional use of the seal. As long as the materials the seal is reproduced on are not paid for by the state, no laws are being violated, he said. […]
Jo Johnson, an attorney for the Senate Republicans, agreed that Duffy’s use adhered to both the State Designations Act and the State Officials and Employees Ethics Act.
“While there is a perceptional issue, I do not believe that it is an ethics violation to use the state seal in a fundraising letter,” Johnson said.
Duffy regularly uses the State Seal on his campaign literature.
* The Question: Should the use of the State Seal be banned for campaign purposes? Explain.
“There’s a lot of stuff in marijuana that’s not good for you,” said Limey Nargelenas, a lobbyist for the Illinois Association of Chiefs of Police.
It’s also unclear whether the relief patients claim to receive from marijuana is good for them in the long term, he said.
“It’s like people taking meth,” he said. “People feel a lot better after ingesting methamphetamine.”
You’d think a guy who once owned a bar/restaurant would want to stay away from that sort of goofy comparison.
This is fear mongering at its worst. Marijuana=Meth. Sheesh. Thank goodness that the Illinois State Police have finally seen the light and are now neutral on Rep. Lou Lang’s bill to legalize medical marijuana. At least some people are thinking clearly.
The following states have enacted laws that legalized medical marijuana: Alaska, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington.
All 14 states require proof of residency for someone to be considered a “qualifying patient” for medical marijuana use. Home cultivation is not allowed in New Jersey, which is finalizing rules and about to launch its program.
* Writing a weekly syndicated column with a Friday afternoon deadline is tough during end-of-session week (or, as it turned out to be “pause-of-session” week). But I had a pretty good idea where things were heading for a few days: Right onto the rocks. So, here it is…
One of the things that became crystal clear last week during the Illinois Senate’s debate over a new state budget was that Democratic legislative leaders have completely broken the budget-making process.
It’s no big secret that more and more power has been concentrated into the hands of the leaders, the House speaker and the Senate president. And now they have it all.
Long gone are the days when the appropriations committees had any input. Also vanished is the “budgeteers” system, when appropriations chairmen and experts from each caucus would sit down to hash out the budget’s details. Instead, all of the work now is being done by staff at the leaders’ absolute direction.
As a consequence, senators barely had any idea about what they were voting for last week when they approved a budget along party lines. The committee hearing before the vote provided precious few details and instead revolved around partisan bickering over a Democratic maneuver solely designed to embarrass the Republicans. Republicans repeatedly denounced the budget process as far too rushed and wholly untransparent, and they were right.
This was without a doubt the most top-down, opaque budget ever produced under the Statehouse dome. The Democrats and Republicans couldn’t even agree on whether spending increased or dropped next fiscal year because there was so little time to analyze the data, and the legislation itself is so obtuse that analysis was made extremely difficult, if not impossible.
The granting of the governor huge new budget powers in a different bill was at the root of that analysis problem. He’s supposed to make most of the cuts, and nobody really knows how much he actually will slash.
The legislation included a 5 percent reduction in personnel and operations lines, but Gov. Pat Quinn would be given the power to hold back even more spending and make major changes to state-mandated programs with the stroke of a pen. Nobody knows how far he will go, so it’s impossible to say just what the final spending level will be.
And then the stinking disaster moved to the House, where liberal independents were upset at the way things were going. Many wanted to see a vote on a tax hike; some wanted cuts. Almost nobody wanted to vote for anything.
The liberal independents were grumbling about “sending a message” by withholding their support, but even they would have to admit that nothing much will improve no matter how much more time they’d take and that things will only get worse for their cherished programs if the session went into overtime and the Republicans got a seat at the table.
There’s no way that a tax hike will pass this month. Even the lib indies had to comprehend that cold, hard fact. The House Democratic recalcitrants have proposed almost no cuts themselves and probably wouldn’t support many if they actually were on the table.
Stomping their feet and demanding they be delivered from this nightmare without coming up with a realistic, doable, passable alternative looked more like the actions of spoiled children who’ve been shielded from unpleasant realities all their lives more than like legislators. They let their big daddy (House Speaker Michael Madigan) run things all year without uttering a single word, and now he set the table with one of the most unpalatable spreads ever and they wanted to hold their breath until they turned blue. Nice timing.
Of course, the Republicans are no better. Several whined last week that recommendations from groups like the Illinois Policy Institute weren’t included in the Democratic budget plan. But not one person from that side of the aisle bothered to turn those budget ideas into an actual piece of legislation. The reason is obvious. Not even the Republicans were willing to go on record supporting such radical cuts.
Senate President John Cullerton (D-Chicago) rightly pointed out last week that Republican gubernatorial candidate Sen. Bill Brady, of Bloomington, had introduced an appropriations bill at the beginning of the year. Instead of turning that bill into an alternative GOP budget, Brady gave up his sponsorship. The House Republican caucus proposed a little more than $5 billion in budget cutting “suggestions” earlier this year, but almost all of it was based on a ridiculous and fiscally impossible scheme to use nonexistent dollars from the capital construction plan to fund the budget. And when the House Republican higher-ups realized what they’d done, they backed away from it entirely.
What a mess this state is in.
* And your big budget bust-up roundup…
* Illinois’ lawmakers paralysis on budget driven by dysfunction, election: “It was another gimmicky bill that was hastily put together and designed to get us out of Springfield and give the governor unprecedented powers to spend (money) as he saw fit with little input from Democratic legislators,” complained Rep. Marlow Colvin, D- Chicago, former chairman of the House Black Caucus, echoing the unhappiness of other minority members. Another bloc of Democratic lawmakers, progressives, also complained that Quinn’s emphasis on maintaining adequate funding for education masked the need to improve human services funding, even though ensuring proper dollars for schools arguably plays better to independent and moderate suburban voters.
* State legislators leave Capitol at a standstill: State Rep. Elaine Nekritz, a Northbrook Democrat, said it would have been “premature” to rush a budget through this week when significantly more time remains for action. “We can always develop a better budget if we work a little bit more and get a little more input,” she said.
* Quinn: Ill. lawmakers ‘pretty close’ on budget: Gov. Pat Quinn said Saturday that lawmakers are “pretty close” to passing a new state budget but offered no explanation for his optimism or even why he now backs a budget that rejects his top legislative priority: a tax increase… “We’re pretty close,” Quinn said. “I think it’s healthy to have a robust debate and discussion this month on the budget, and ultimately they’ll be a vote, certainly before the end of the month.”
* House fails to act on budget: The GOP’s choice for governor, state Sen. Bill Brady (R-Bloomington), said debt-heavy budget plans put before lawmakers Friday were the handiwork of “incompetence on the second floor,” referring to Quinn’s Statehouse office. “I will proudly take credit for stopping the Democrats from digging a deeper hole of debt, placing a burden on our children and grandchildren,” Brady said. “Someone’s got to stand up and be responsible.” Quinn shot back at Brady, accusing him of putting gubernatorial grandstanding ahead of the state’s neediest residents. “He wants to spend money, but he doesn’t want to vote for the funding. He was over here trying to cause chaos,” Quinn said, “and he’s not going to get away with it.”
* The blame game: “A year ago, we said to you, ‘Yes, we will participate in a borrowing plan,’” Cross said. “The problem of today versus a year ago is we said to the governor, ‘Governor, we’re going to give you a chance, we have a new governor, a fresh start, we have some problems.’” But Quinn didn’t live up to House Republicans’ expectations, Cross said. “Our governor needs to lead. Leaders lead. He needs to cut; he needs to control spending; he needs to pay his bills; he needs to provide for job growth and Medicaid reform.”
