* 10:25 am - From what I gather this morning, Versace didn’t have a replacement lined up when Pearson left, so this is a bit odd…
Congressional candidate Dick Versace and his campaign manager parted ways Monday.
The decision was mutual and amicable, Versace said. His former campaign manager, Alex Pearson, said he’s worked on numerous campaigns on the local, state and federal level, but declined to officially elaborate on his reasons for the abrupt departure.
* 10:44 am - If I were you, I’d watch CBS 2tonight tomorrow night (long weekend and Wednesday session start has messed up my time awareness). That is all.
*** UPDATE *** Here’s a teaser. Watch the full report Wednesday at 10 pm.
* 10:48 am - Wyoming is now backing Illinois’ FutureGen bid…
Gov. Dave Freudenthal has endorsed Illinois’ bid for a project that aims to refine coal gasification and other “clean” technologies for coal.
Freudenthal indicated his support for Illinois on the FutureGen project because officials there have agreed to share research and other information regarding clean coal technologies.
The administration appears to be doing a pretty good job at lining up support from other states. Rare show of competence?
Lawyers for Illinois Attorney General, Lisa Madigan and Illinois Secretary of State Jesse White, will appear before a three-Judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals this morning at 9 a.m. to urge that a lower court ruling that Illinois begin producing “Choose Life” specialty license plates be overturned. The argument will take place in the appellate courtroom on the 27th floor of the Dirksen Federal Building at 219 South Dearborn Street – the corner of Adams and Dearborn Streets – in downtown Chicago. Each side will argue for twenty minutes before three appellate Judges, whose identities are never disclosed until the morning of the oral argument.
* 11:55 am - The Chicago Federation of Labor released its endorsement list today. I didn’t include the judge list, but Anne Burke was endorsed for Supreme Court. Dean T. Maragos, Kathleen Therese Meany and Cynthia Santos (the wife of Rep. Rich Bradley) got the nod for MWRD. Joe Berrios and Larry Rogers, Jr. were endorsed for the Board of Review.
The CFL endorsed Tom Allen for State’s Attorney, “because of his long record of fighting on behalf of working families as a Public Defender, attorney in private practice, and member of the Chicago City Council where he has served since 1993.”
Here are the rest…
* Dorothy Brown - Clerk of the Circuit Court
* Eugene “Gene” Moore - Cook County Recorder of Deeds
* Bob Fioretti – 2nd Ward Committeeman
* Pat Dowell – 3rd Ward Committeeman
* Sandi Jackson – 7th Ward Committeeman
* Toni L. Foulkes – 15th Ward Committeeman
* JoAnn Thompson – 16th Ward Committeeman
* Willie B. Cochran – 20th Ward Committeeman
* Sharon Denise Dixon – 24th Ward Committeeman
* John A. Fritchey – 32nd Ward Committeeman
* John Corrigan – 42nd Ward Committeeman
* Patrick J. Levar – 45th Ward Committeeman
*** 1:37 pm *** I heard the AP folks were working on this yesterday. Apparently, the governor is taking money from at least two different bond series than he said he would…
State records show that Governor Rod Blagojevich propped up Chicago mass transit systems with money intended for other purposes.
The Chicago Transit Authority and its suburban counterpart were about to run out of money earlier this month when Blagojevich gave them $27 million while lawmakers try to reach a permanent solution.
Aides at the time said the grant was coming from money set aside for railroad and rapid transit systems. But Blagojevich took $22 million from money reserved for bricks-and-mortar construction, highways and energy projects.
The story goes on to say that the governor’s office won’t respond to inquiries about the apparently illegal skim. Huh. Imagine that.
What he’s done here is raided cash from bond funds that have nothing to do with public transportation. This won’t exactly help his cause with Downstate legislators who are already worried about the prospect of using GRF money for his proposed transit bailout.
*** UPDATE *** The AP has added to its original brief…
The $27 million technically is from a bond fund set up for mass transit and aviation projects. But only $4.6 million was in that account to start.
The day he announced the stopgap, Blagojevich transferred $10.2 million in bond money reserved for coal development and alternative energy projects, $7.4 million for highway construction and $4.8 million for general building projects.
*** 1:51 pm *** Daley’s endorsement of the transit “deal” means more pressure will now be exerted on Gov. Blagojevich to release his five House Democratic votes tomorrow, and on Senate President Emil Jones, who is facing stiff opposition in his caucus to doing any transit deal before a capital bill is finalized…
Following Madigan’s lead, [Mayor] Daley today endorsed a plan by Gov. Blagojevich and Illinois House Minority Leader Tom Cross (R-Oswego) to redirect at least $385 million a year in state sales taxes on fuel to mass transit. The mayor said he’s optimistic the plan will pass both legislative houses at Wednesday’s special session.
Hizzoner also appeared to back Speaker Madigan’s refusal to hurry up a deal on the gaming bill, which will provide cash for the capital plan…
But, the mayor said a casino deal that has eluded the General Assembly for more than a decade cannot be pulled together during a special session.
“It’s very complicated - especially when you go into the casino issue. It’s very, very complicated,” he said.
* 2:48 pm - Funny, touching tribute to the late John Drury [Another one is here]…
* Stephanie Coontz, the author of “Marriage, a History: How Love Conquered Marriage,” penned this interesting and eye-opening Op-Ed in the New York Times the other day….
Why do people — gay or straight — need the state’s permission to marry? For most of Western history, they didn’t, because marriage was a private contract between two families. The parents’ agreement to the match, not the approval of church or state, was what confirmed its validity.
For 16 centuries, Christianity also defined the validity of a marriage on the basis of a couple’s wishes. If two people claimed they had exchanged marital vows — even out alone by the haystack — the Catholic Church accepted that they were validly married. […]
Not until the 16th century did European states begin to require that marriages be performed under legal auspices. In part, this was an attempt to prevent unions between young adults whose parents opposed their match.
The American colonies officially required marriages to be registered, but until the mid-19th century, state supreme courts routinely ruled that public cohabitation was sufficient evidence of a valid marriage. By the later part of that century, however, the United States began to nullify common-law marriages and exert more control over who was allowed to marry.
By the 1920s, 38 states prohibited whites from marrying blacks, “mulattos,” Japanese, Chinese, Indians, “Mongolians,” “Malays” or Filipinos. Twelve states would not issue a marriage license if one partner was a drunk, an addict or a “mental defect.” Eighteen states set barriers to remarriage after divorce.
And her conclusion…
Perhaps it’s time to revert to a much older marital tradition. Let churches decide which marriages they deem “licit.” But let couples — gay or straight — decide if they want the legal protections and obligations of a committed relationship.
* Question: Do you agree with this reasoning? Explain. And try to stay civil. Thanks.
* This item in a Boston Globe story tells us a lot about trusting the national media’s polls in Iowa…
In making [caucus turnout] projections, campaigns rely above all on their “hard count,” a tally of voters who have pledged to support them, and a list of previous caucusgoers made available for sale by the state party.
But no media organization is believed to have purchased such a list, so instead of knowing who has participated in past caucuses - considered the best indicator of turnout - pollsters are random-dialing households and asking voters whether they have voted before and how interested they are in the current race.
Iowa’s goofy process is drastically different than a traditional primary. You have to go to a neighbor’s house and openly declare your support for a candidate. So you’d think the media’s polling methods would be different. They’re not. Oops.
* I looked through today’s mass transit “deal” stories to find a different angle than we used yesterday, and figured this was as good a place to lead off our coverage as any…
As a high school choir sang “Winter Wonderland” at a tree-lighting ceremony at the Thompson Center Monday, a group of activists tried to drown them out, chanting “Tree lights out, bus lights on!”
The 10 ministers and wheelchair-bound CTA riders crashed the tree lighting, hosted by first lady Patti Blagojevich, to demand action in Springfield on the CTA funding shortfall. […]
“We’re here to tell elected officials enough is enough,” said Roosevelt Watkins, pastor at Bethlehem Star Church and a member of Pastors United for Change. “How can we sing Christmas carols when we know 2,400 people will lose their jobs?”
I don’t know much about that group, but it is a bit different. Rev. Watkins hosted a forum for Hillary Clinton in May, for instance, which allowed her to claim African-American support in Barack Obama’s home turf.
* Anyway, back to transit. Like I said, there’s not much “new” here if you were on the blog yesterday afternoon. Gatehouse…
Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan now supports a mass transit funding plan backed by House Republicans and Gov. Rod Blagojevich — but the Chicago Democrat’s change of heart still may not be enough to get the transit bailout put into law.
Downstate Senate Democrats reiterated Monday that they will not support any mass transit plan until the General Assembly also approves a public works construction bill.
While Madigan now appears more in lockstep with Blagojevich and other legislative leaders about transit funding, his letter was silent about how to backfill the $385 million budget hole that redirecting gas-tax dollars to the RTA would leave. That’s among a host of issues that could derail the transit-bailout train in Springfield.
Madigan’s spokesman, Steve Brown, said the speaker intends to work with Blagojevich to fill the gas-tax hole by ending corporate tax breaks.
Other lawmakers have suggested that new forms of gambling — including a Chicago casino, additional casinos outside Chicago and slot machines at horse tracks — could plug that gap and also fund a multibillion-dollar state construction program for roads, schools and other projects.
David Dring, a top Cross aide, was cautiously optimistic about Madigan’s new stance but stressed the construction program still has to be part of the overall transit-funding equation.
As far as plugging the hole in the state’s general fund, Madigan’s spokesman, Steve Brown, mentioned the governor’s proposal to end some corporate tax breaks. “The speaker has been supportive of closing corporate loopholes in the past,” Brown said. “I suspect it’ll be something that will be addressed down the road. I don’t envision that being addressed this week.” He said the state Constitution limits the legislature to discussing a specific topic designated by the special session.
If the House can approve the transit funding proposal Wednesday, when Blagojevich has called the Legislature into special session, that will put the onus on the Senate, where leaders of both parties have indicated a transit measure will go nowhere without the accompanying construction program.
If all they’re worried about is who should take the blame, that’s easy.
Blame Mayor Daley. It really is mostly his fault that it’s come to this point, which probably hasn’t been emphasized enough.
He’s the one who continued to milk the agency for its political patronage benefits while failing to grasp the depth of its problems or at least to treat them with the proper urgency until the system came to the brink of collapse. It’s his crisis more than theirs.
Blame Daley and move on.
Daley has effectively skirted blame in this mess, so Brown is right that some fingers ought to start pointing at hizzoner.
* Sen. Dale Righter puts his own spin on the situation…
What is the solution? First, the service reductions and fare increases that transit officials have warned us about should be implemented — they would be far from the catastrophe that the “doomsday” rhetoric has led some to believe. In fact, they consist of entirely reasonable and necessary fare increases of approximately 10%, and elimination of duplicative routes. After that is achieved, the systems’ compensation and oversight structures must change — they have become bloated and ineffective, as demonstrated by last year’s fire and the resulting NTBS findings. Then, and only after then, should there be a serious discussion of additional funding.
* But the CTA Tattler counters some of that logic…
[GOP Rep. Sandy Cole of Grayslake] makes this spurious argument in favor of a fare increase:
“”Between 2001 and 2006, the price of gasoline has increased 68 percent, but CTA cash fares have only increased 15 percent. It is fair to expect riders to pay for increased fares, just like motorists have to pay more for gasoline.”
Carfree Chicago has a good retort to that argument in comments on a post about the subject at Illinois Transportation Issues:
“Why should transit riders be punished for using an efficient form of transportation not affected as much by the shifts in the price of gasoline? Trains don’t run on gasoline. It justs sounds like pure whining — we have to pay more so you should too!”
I’d like the Republicans to fully show their cards on what that fare increase should look like.
* Lawsuit stirs debate over program that some say leads to ‘academic bankruptcy’
But legislatures are starting to get involved — at least at the public school level — because of financial issues, Nassirian said. The more times a student can withdraw from a class or get grades forgiven, it “may induce existing students to sort of hang around” as perpetual students, he said.
That means the state is paying more for a frequent-repeater student’s education than someone who goes straight through. Meanwhile, eligible students trying to enroll can’t get in because the seats are full.
“So it becomes a kind of subsidy issue,” Nassirian said.
In Texas, the legislature recently voted to limit students to six withdrawals during a student’s career, Nassirian said.
The oddity was first noticed by my SouthtownStar colleague, John Hector, who was glancing at the State of Illinois Candidates Guide for 2008 when a date jumped out at him.
Under a category labeled “Annual Municipal Election,” there was a subsection marked “Municipal Primary (if required) … Dec. 25, 2007.
“As far as I know, no one else in the state has noticed that,” said an official at the state elections board. “And I mean every candidate in Illinois looks at that thing. How the heck did you spot it?”
* Deadline changed for write-in filing in Will Co.
By leveraging “friend” connections and using virtual “word-of-mouth” marketing, these social sites offer an opportunity to break through the media cacophony. On sites like Facebook, trusted people spread political messages in a way only dreamed of in the age of mass media.
Social technology assists politicos and advocacy organizations in five key areas – branding, voter registration, fundraising, volunteering, and voter turnout.
I’m not a big fan of Tony Peraica, but I have to say that I am impressed that he had the cajones to do his own damn petition challenge against the other Republican running for Cook County States Attorney.
First, this is the holiday season, when local governments often get away with unpopular outrages because some citizens are too busy to protest loudly.
Second, Stroger knows that — unless pressure from voters changes one or two minds — soon — he probably can pass big tax increases. Nine of the 17 County Board members have told the Tribune in recent weeks that they think Stroger’s government needs more revenue from taxes.
* Lack of support may postpone vote on Stroger’s $888 million tax plan
* Clout Street: Vote on Stroger tax hike plan may be delayed
* Editorial: State auditor should dig out duplication
Auditor General William Holland found out there is no master list of programs operated by state agencies.
Holland sought such a list at the request of the Legislative Audit Commission, which wanted to see whether services were being duplicated by more than one agency or program. But before Holland could get to that stage, he had to ask each agency for a list of their programs; there was no master list.
His request turned up about 1,750 programs - and Holland suspects the list is incomplete.
* Lawmakers in Illinois hear about nursing home buyout; more here
A panel of Illinois lawmakers on Monday was urged to scrutinize closely the pending sale of 31 Illinois nursing homes to a private-equity firm.
The hearing of the state’s House Committee on Aging centered on Washington, D.C.-based Carlyle Group’s $6.3-billion leveraged buyout of Toledo, Ohio-based Manor Care Inc. Manor Care operates more than 500 nursing homes and other facilities nationally, including 31 Illinois facilities that care for a total of 3,500 residents.
* Hastert resignation now official- gives Gov just enough time to schedule primary on Feb. 5th; more here and here
* GOP leaders, contenders laud Hastert’s hard work
* Wurfwhile: 14-CD candidate burns TV ad seems stiff, won’t get job done
*** 2:13 pm *** Speaker Madigan is agreeing to the mass transit bailout proposed by House GOP Leader Cross and Gov. Blagojevich. However, both of those men have demanded that any transit deal be tied directly to a capital program. Madigan apparently hasn’t agreed to that yet.
In other words, Madigan is accepting their transit language as a standalone proposal and leaving it up to Cross and Blagojevich to decide whether they’ll support their own idea divorced from capital.
From a letter Madigan sent to state legislators today…
On Wednesday, November 28, in response to Governor Blagojevich’s special session proclamation, the General Assembly will convene for the purpose of considering legislation that provides “funding solutions for mass transit.”
Last week, the governor sent a letter to all representatives and senators indicating that he supports a plan advanced by Republican Leader Tom Cross, contained in House Bill 4161, which re-directs the state’s share of the sales tax on gasoline in Cook and the collar counties to the RTA.
This is not our preferred solution. As is well known, we favor Senate Bill 572 because it is structured to not be merely a bailout or a band-aid, but to provide the RTA and its service boards with a reasonably stable source of operating funds that would help them avoid the need to return in a few years to the capitol with hat in hand.
However, as an act of compromise, we are willing to accept the Blagojevich-Cross plan and ask that our fellow lawmakers support it, too. We face a genuine crisis and the time to act is now. It is irresponsible to continue to leave workers and employers wondering about travel to jobs, students concerned about making it to class and senior citizens worried about preserving their independence and ability to get to leisure activities, visit relatives, go shopping and see the doctor. This compromise will put an end to the piecemeal cash infusions, months of anxiety for transit riders and workers, and the incessant, and unfortunate, legislative drama that has surrounded this issue for the past several months.
In brief, the legislation we will advance, with some technical adjustments, is modeled on House Bill 4161. It does not include a general sales tax increase, nor would it allow the city of Chicago to increase its real estate transfer tax. The reform components of Senate Bill 572, which include substantial pension and benefit concessions from transit unions and other requirements to protect the best interests of taxpayers and transit riders, will remain in the bill. Allocations to Metra, Pace and the CTA are generally comparable to those in Senate Bill 572. For a more detailed explanation of the measure’s provisions, please see the accompanying fact sheet.
Just as we believe that others should not hold hostage transit riders in northeastern Illinois for the sake of accomplishing unrelated ends, we will not treat mass transit riders as pawns to be used as leverage to pass our desired solution. Instead, we choose to take Governor Blagojevich and Republican Leader Cross at their word and, for the sake of transit riders, will support the funding mechanism they favor.
We also share the governor’s expressed desire to see this bill passed before the holidays and fear that a failure to do so will jeopardize the broad and significant reforms it contains.
The heads of the service boards, RTA chairman, transit unions, and Mayor Daley have made it clear that we cannot afford any further delay. The damage to the livability and economic viability of the northeastern Illinois region would be severe, possibly catastrophic, if its mass transit system is allowed to deteriorate. The issue at hand is mass transit and now is the time to set aside alternative agendas and embrace this compromise.
Session begins at 1:00 p.m. on Wednesday. We expect to proceed to partisan caucuses shortly thereafter and to call this measure for a floor vote sometime later in the day.
Click here for the full Madigan letter with attached info sheet.
*** 2:48 pm *** From Blagojevich spokesperson Rebecca Rausch…
This was a compromise solution we embraced several weeks ago. We made this compromise the center-piece of the special session we called for Wednesday. We hope the legislature can muster the votes necessary to pass it quickly.
Now, the question becomes whether Blagojevich releases his five House Democrats who voted against the earlier bill.
*** 3:13 pm *** From House Republican Leader Tom Cross’ spokesman…
We believe it is positive that [Madigan] agrees with us that now is not the time to burden citizens with higher taxes.
We hope he will continue to work on passing a capital bill to address the great needs of mass transit, road construction, school construction and higher education.
I’ll have more on what that actually means in tomorrow’s Capitol Fax.
But it’s uncertain whether the proposal he now says he’ll support will go anywhere. That’s because a letter Madigan released this afternoon makes no mention of finding money to pay for a statewide construction program.
*** 3:20 pm *** Big trouble in the Senate.
Sen. John Sullivan (D-Rushville) just said that Downstate Senate Democrats still believe that transit and capital are “absolutely locked together,” and reiterated their earlier vow to vote against a transit bill until a capital deal is worked out. Sen. Sullivan said he and his colleagues were more than willing to work out a solution.
*** 3:56 pm *** Senate President Emil Jones’ office has “No comment” on the proposal.
*** 4:17 pm *** From the Senate Republicans…
It’s a mirage. Without a proposal to backfill GRF, this particular bill is not a plan.
*** 4:49 pm *** More from the Senate Republicans. Apparently, this e-mail bounced back at them from my account…
It appears the Speaker and Rep. Hamos have come to the realization that there is little support for a tax increase. Senate Republicans have been clear all along that asking the taxpayers to foot the bill is not the solution. We believe the transit systems must be invested in the solution — with greater efficiences, budget cuts and reforms.
* I immediately thought of three things when I realized that last week was the 20th anniversary of Mayor Harold Washington’s death. The first was how I learned of his passing. Some friends and I were jovially traveling north from Springfield for Thanksgiving break when the news broke. We sat in stunned silence as we listened to the radio.
* The second thing that came to mind was the Royko column referenced by the Tribune editorial page the other day…
So I told Uncle Chester: Don’t worry, Harold Washington doesn’t want to marry your sister. — Mike Royko, Feb. 23, 1983
That’s how Mike Royko opened his column the day after Harold Washington stunned Chicago and won the Democratic primary for mayor.
Washington would be Chicago’s first black mayor. If you were too young at the time, or weren’t in Chicago, you may not realize just how extraordinarily well that one sentence from Royko captured the angst of many people in this city.
Marry your sister, run your city; there wasn’t much difference in the eyes of many white Chicagoans. To them, the election of Harold Washington spelled trouble.
In fact, Mr. Washington has cleverly worked the [Al Capone] theme into his standard stump speech, saying that the time will come when people overseas who used to reply, ‘’Al Capone - rat-a-tat-tat'’ when they met someone from Chicago, will ask instead, ‘’How’s Harold?'’
* Question: What’s your strongest memory of Harold Washington?
In what can only be seen as another maneuver to set public policy from the Governor’s office, Illinois’ Department of Human Services recently informed Project Reality — the state’s key abstinence education provider — that the non-profit group has been eliminated from the state budget.
* But the other side says the federal rules which governor the program don’t make sense…
The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy just released Emerging Answers 2007 (www.thenationalcampaign.org) by Dr. Douglas Kirby, a leading sexual health researcher. The report studied 48 programs to see how well they prevented unintended teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV. Two-thirds of the programs showed positive behavioral changes among students, including delayed initiation of sex and increased condom or contraceptive use. Almost 30 percent of students had less sex or no sex; and more than 60 percent had unprotected sex less often.
How did these programs succeed? They taught both abstinence and the use of condoms and contraceptives - a comprehensive approach to sexuality education and prevention all Illinois students deserve.
Unfortunately, Illinois accepts federal funding for abstinence-only sex education from the Title V program, which requires Illinois to provide $2.5 million in matching funds. These are squandered resources because abstinence-only programs have never been able to show success in keeping students from engaging in sexual activity. A study released in April 2007 by Mathematica Policy Research Inc. found that such programs had no effect on the sexual abstinence of youth. The only abstinence consistently linked to this kind of education is an abstinence from safety, because these courses do not teach young people how contraceptives, including condoms, are used.
In fact, to get federal funding for abstinence-only programs, you must prove the instructors never discuss any form of contraception. This poses a serious public health risk to Illinois youth.
* Meanwhile, the Southtown ran a column today in place of mine (I took the week off) which looks at the hugely controversial “moment of silence” law that a federal judge recently enjoined from being enforced. The piece was written by Dean Koldenhoven, the former mayor of Palos Heights…
I believe the intent of a “period of silence” for approximately 20-30 seconds could be saved if the legislators would delete the words “silent prayer” from the law. When our Illinois state legislators meet in Springfield, they could take up this change in wording and salvage the law without giving up the few moments of silence at the beginning of school-day activities.
An alternative proposed by Rep. John Fritchey would delete the word “prayer” from the law as well as kill off the mandate to hold a moment of silence altogether.
Politically, though, I wonder how some legislators are gonna deal with the prospect of “eliminating prayer” in an election year. Pretty much all of them recognize that they’re in a tough spot with this controversy, but there’s no easy way out.
* Remember before the Thanksgiving break when Gov. Rod Blagojevich had this to say about the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules’ blocking of his emergency healthcare proposal?
“Where is it written that a handful of legislators — 12 of them — can tell the executive branch what it’s going to do when it comes to administering the executive branch?”
I’ve been mentioning here and in the Capitol Fax that Gov. Blagojevich signed legislation that vastly expanded JCAR’s powers, so he ought to have known where it’s “written.” Aaron Chambers digs deeper…
Since 1980, JCAR has had the power under Illinois law to veto administrative rules. In 2004, a year after taking office as governor, Blagojevich strengthened that power — effectively putting himself at a greater disadvantage in any battle with JCAR over his administration’s own rules.
Before 2004, JCAR’s objection to a rule was temporary unless the Legislature voted to sustain it. Thanks to the governor’s signature, however, JCAR’s objection is final unless the Legislature votes to overrule it.
Before Blagojevich approved that 2004 law, JCAR’s power to block a rule depended on whether the Legislature backed up its objection. Thanks to Blagojevich, it may permanently block a rule on its own — without the support of the Legislature as a whole.
“I am somewhat flabbergasted that the governor would just kind of say, ‘I’m not going to pay any attention to that,’” Edgar said, adding that “I don’t think is very productive in trying to solve the major problems that are facing the state of Illinois.”
Gov. Rod Blagojevich… will ask the Legislature next year to create a state-regulated pool of affordable private health insurance policies for individuals, families and small businesses.
“It would be kind of a public-private partnership,” deputy governor Sheila Nix told The State Journal-Register last week. “The thing I think we like the most about it is that it gives everybody an option to buy an affordable insurance plan.”
That insurance pool idea was part of the governor’s ill-fated Illinois Covered plan, which never got out of the Senate, despite strong support by Senate Democratic leadership.
He wants to fund the subsidized insurance pool, as well as other initiatives to benefit uninsured and insured residents alike, with a proposed 3 percent payroll tax on all but the smallest employers that offer workers little or no health benefits.
But passing such a tax is unlikely at best in an election year, not to mention the governor’s awful poll numbers. So, expect another legislative bypass…
Though the governor needs the proposed $1.1 billion-a-year employer assessment to fund Illinois Covered in future years, Nix said he will start up several of the plan’s programs with money he cut from the budget.
As you might imagine, the new idea isn’t going over too well in the House…
“It’s an already difficult relationship,” said Steve Brown, spokesman for House Speaker Michael Madigan, D-Chicago. “This probably makes it more difficult.”
* It’s not difficult to understand why the Daily Herald would slant towards the horse racing industry, since the Arlington track is in the paper’s prime coverage area. But, still, isn’t this a bit much?
After getting nothing but coal in their stockings for the past decade or so, officials at Hawthorne Race Course and Arlington Park are hoping to get the one gift they really want this holiday season.
Slots.
With Gov. Rod Blagojevich calling a special session of the Illinois legislature this week to discuss a gaming expansion bill — one that would include slots at the two local tracks — the odds are steep but they’re as good as they’ve ever been for the thoroughbred industry to get the added influx of money it believes it needs.
“Everything seems to be pointing in that direction,” said Jim Miller, assistant general manager at Hawthorne. “But too many times we’ve had high hopes before.”
Not mentioned in the article is that the tracks have received a state subsidy for years. There was a time when the tracks subsidized the state. Now, it’s the other way around.
Personally, I think horse racing is a fine thing. And as long as any gaming expansion plan includes super-strict, binding rules requiring the tracks to focus lots of that newfound cash on expanding and vastly improving their deteriorating core business, then I guess the idea wouldn’t be so bad. But the poor-mouthing really gets old.
* Editorial: Stroger should take cue from snub by other county officials
Perhaps most astounding of all, Stroger himself admits his new tax would raise far more money than the county needs. The anticipated shortfall in 2008 is $239 million. But rather than cut his $3.2 billion spending plan, Stroger wants his constituents to give him more than he needs today, so he can continue spending more next year and the year after without having to come back and ask for more in 2008 and 2009.
* Chuck Sweeny: Iowa still has more clout than Illinois primary
* Schoenburg: After getting an earful, Versace talks about issues
DICK VERSACE is answering questions now, and that sure makes him seem like a better candidate than he appeared to be when he made his formal campaign announcement for Congress in early October.
Versace, a former Bradley University and NBA basketball coach making his first foray into politics, said at his Statehouse announcement back then that he wanted to go out on what he called a “common-sense express” RV tour and visit voters in all 20 counties that make up the 18th Congressional District.
Versace refused to answer issue questions then, and it didn’t make for a pretty scene.
* Editorial: Hastert resignation will create a mess
But Hastert is silent on his reason. … Hastert owes an explanation to his constituents and to all taxpayers in Illinois, who will help foot the bill for the likely special primary and special election that will determine not the 14th District representative for a number of years, but for a number of months.
This all strikes us as a ridiculous waste of time, energy and money that could have been averted had Hastert been willing to complete the promise he made to voters when he accepted his latest term.
The moment offered a rare opportunity for Giuliani to side with Obama, saying that “we are all human beings” and should avoid any “pretense of perfection.”
Not a bad idea, since that quality is no more common among politicians than among the rest us. And there’s something else to be said for politicians acknowledging youthful mistakes rather than claim to have led saintly lives: The kids might actually believe them.
An ad hoc committee of the Quincy School Board will send a representative to Springfield to learn how the Illinois Department of Labor sets the prevailing wage rate.
The committee hopes that through learning about the process, Adams County might be able to set its own rate that would save money for the Quincy School District on construction projects.
“We want to know how they do it,” said Dennis Gorman, the School District’s legal counsel. “I hear a lot of questions about the validity of that. There’s an option there that we can do it.”
The winner of the first-ever Lifetime Achievement Award from the East Central Iowa-Northwestern Illinois AFL-CIO Hall of Fame is 87 years old and still hasn’t slowed down.
“He’s on the go every day from 9:30 a.m. until midnight,” Jerry Messer, head of the Quad City Federation of Labor, said Friday of the award recipient, Dick Fallow of Davenport.
* Opinion: Illinois plan could cut costs for consumers
Under legislation passed last year, Ameren is required to offer this optional program that allows participants to take advantage of the electricity market’s hourly ups and downs to cut power bills while reducing demand for electricity and preventing pollution.
* Firm exploring Chicago naming rights, sponsorships
Might visitors to the Windy City someday ride the Lowe’s Chicago El, shop on the Microsoft Magnificent Mile and tour Old Navy Pier?
What’s in a name for the future isn’t clear, but the city has hired a marketing firm to explore the potential for naming rights and sponsorships as a way to bring in needed revenue, the Chicago Tribune reported Friday.
