Monday, May 21, 2007 - Posted by Capitol Fax Blog Advertising Department
The following is a paid advertisement
Insurance companies are leading a propaganda campaign against SB 1296.
SB 1296 is not about “deep pockets,” but merely responds to a recent Appellate Court case that creates a legal loophole allowing negligent manufacturers, reckless construction companies and even drunk drivers to dodge their responsibility when their negligence injures or kills someone.
Opponents of SB 1296 are hoping that recent Appellate Court case will overturn 21 years of legal practice, allowing wrongdoers to shift responsibility for their negligence to individuals and small businesses who have long ago been dismissed as defendants from a lawsuit, by placing their name on jury verdict forms and encouraging juries to assign damages against them.
Insurance companies falsely claim that dismissed defendants have always appeared on jury verdict forms. Not true, says the St. Louis Post-Dispatch:
“Historically, juries have not been allowed to consider settling defendants when figuring out percentages of fault, since 1986, when that portion of the civil liability code was written.” (4/23/2007)
Before you buy into the “Deep Pockets” propaganda, keep in mind that 88% of all tort cases in Illinois are for $50,000 or less (Illinois Supreme Court annual report).
* The Metropolitan Mayors Caucus, a group founded by Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley, is set to propose raising the income tax on “people” from 3 percent to 5 percent and hike the corporate income tax rate from the current 4.8 percent to 8 percent, according to Southtown columnist Phil Kadner.
The group wants to raise $7 billion in new revenue with $2.1 billion earmarked to increase the per pupil foundation level and another $3 billion set aside for property tax relief. […]
“Specifically, the principles call for having the State of Illinois fund at least 51 percent of the cost of funding education in a way that guarantees an increase in education funding from year to year; reducing the reliance on local property sources as a source of funding; and directing a significant portion of new state education dollars to provide greater state funding to under-funded school districts by raising the per pupil foundation level.” […]
However, the memo states, “… the caucus is open to other funding mechanisms, such as combining a lower income tax increase with either a sales tax increase or an expansion of the sales tax base.” […]
The mayors’ proposal sets aside millions in new dollars for special education funding, as well as early childhood education. It also earmarks $500 million to alleviate the deficits in the pension funds for state and City of Chicago teachers.
The plan calls for a better data system to measure student gains and determine teacher and principal effectiveness. It outlines a streamlined process for dismissing inadequate teachers. It proposes a statewide group to drive an Illinois education agenda going forward. It establishes financial rewards for excellent teachers and schools.
Also included: intensive mentoring and induction programs for teachers and principals; financial training for school board members; easier routes to alternative teaching certification for career-switchers; an expansion of the number of charter schools permitted in Illinois; and better reimbursement to districts for costly special education programs.
The plan calls for a pool of money schools could tap if they spend it on research-proven, high-impact strategies: reduced class sizes; smaller schools; longer school days and school years; and parent involvement programs.
* More tax and spend items, compiled by Paul…
* Editorial: Universal health care fails political litmus test
* Expert says nationwide system could save health care
* Editorial: Budget rhetoric leaves us with too many questions
* FOP President: Invest in ‘preschool for all’ for a more secure future
* Uncertainly rules in Springfield as officials face tough issues
Last week, my intern Paul wrote a brief bit for the Capitol Fax about the lessons he’s learned so far this year. Paul will be with us through August, but I thought it would be a good time to get his impressions about the Statehouse scene.
He did such a good job that I asked him to expand the piece and then used it in my syndicated newspaper column. Go read the whole thing, but here are some excerpts…
After four months under the tutelage of Rich Miller, I’ve been blessed to experience more of the Springfield process than many get in a lifetime. I learn a dozen new things each day. […]
Elected office still is very much a family affair. As I continue to meet more politicians, I have learned that, more often than not, their back story includes a father, uncle, cousin or close mentor who themselves were elected or were actively involved in the process. That reality is no different than in any other profession. Parents help their sons and daughters by pulling strings all the time. But correctly or not, the public outcry over political nepotism is more than that for all other occupations combined.
At the end of the day, most people involved in the process get along quite well. Republicans and Democrats share poker games, dinners, deep conversations, jokes and family vacations. Before I got here, I had bought into the notion of two distinct groups of elephants and donkeys locked in a constant and personal battle. Now I realize that party here is like eye color — often ignored and hard to determine unless looking closely.
Money doesn’t dictate everything, but it does most things. The issues that draw the most legislative bloodshed and attract the lobbying kings are those that involve cash: deciding who gets more at who’s expense. The vast majority of contentious bills are pieces of the never-ending fiscal battle royal between the big interests, from hospitals and lawyers to insurance companies and unions. The Statehouse is a large machine fueled by hundred of bills determining who wins money and who loses money.
Public service attracts more criticism and less praise than any other position. No matter what issue or official is involved, critiques will outnumber compliments at least 5 to 1; it is often even more lopsided. […]
It is genuinely difficult for the average citizen to affect policy-making. I have witnessed the steady drum of Statehouse rallies and have been struck with the pessimistic feeling that “none of this really matters.” From education funding to electric rate relief, I can’t help but notice that these decisions don’t hinge on how many posters are displayed, chants are belted or feet are stomped. The problems are complex, and the solutions are even more complex. Only a few individuals truly know why things happen the way they do. Ninety-nine point nine percent of Illinoisans will never know.
With everything else going on - sky-high electric bills, huge gasoline prices, talk of tax hikes and legislative pay raises, etc. - this story, entitled “Nothing but the best — on taxpayers’ tab,” will undoubtedly be the talk of the town…
A $38,000 clock. Four-hundred-dollar doorknobs. Redecorated bathrooms for state legislators and staff — more than $444,000.
Those are among the hidden costs of a multimillion-dollar makeover of the Illinois House and Senate with opulent showpieces re-creating the look of the chambers in the late 1800s. […]
A Madigan aide said planners set out in painstaking detail to re-create the original look of the chambers. Historic renovation is inherently expensive, the aide said, and this work should last decades. […]
“I can’t think of a worst possible, frickin’ time for them to be doing this,” said Jay Stewart, the Better Government Association’s executive director. “Pay raises for us, gridlock for everyone else. And, by the way, we’ll have really nice bathrooms.”
Other expenses include automated window shades in the House that cost $15,128, a custom-made brass clock in the Senate that cost $38,582 and 27 custom-made doorknobs bearing the state seal that cost $405 each.
Even so, I am a bit surprised at the Sun-Times’ online reader “poll,” which found that not even 60 percent of respondents thought the expenditures were a waste…
As of 5 p.m. Sunday, a total of 35,762 votes were cast in an online survey that asked if the project was “a fitting tribute to history or a government waste.”
Nearly 60 percent of those who voted declared it a waste. The rest who voted indicated that the price is right.
Considering the way the article was written and the type of people who participate in online surveys of this nature (normally, only the angry ones might be expected to register their opinions), I’d expect that number to be way higher.
As early as May 22, Crist is expected to sign the Florida Legislature’s plan to move up the Sunshine State’s 2008 presidential primary to Jan. 29, leapfrogging a critical mass of states gravitating to primaries on what’s becoming known as “Super-Duper Tuesday” on Feb. 5.
“Keep your mouth shut and your ears open. If you learn your trade, you get more done,” said Ald. Bernard Stone (50th), the City Council’s 79-year-old elder statesman.
Forgot to close comments last night, so everyone had a little extra opportunity to vent. I’ll talk at ‘ya Monday, but in the meantime head to Illinoize. Bethany Carson of Illinois Issues’ blog has a must-read weekly legislative roundup. Then again, all of Illinoize is a must-read.
“First, I wanted to talk about local issues that the larger sites just don’t address. I wanted to talk about Don Moffitt. I wanted to talk about the county sheriff elections and the state’s attorney’s office,” he said. “Second, I wanted to try and get a local perspective on national issues - the national issues that really hit home.”
Also, Zapwater Communications has a new blog. The Illinois PR firm says the effort is doubling traffic to the company’s main website. They’ll be blogging at Illinoize soon.
And finally, from Marie at Disarranging Mine blog, a photo of the governor’s mansion.
Marie’s cutline: “Well hidden and in need of some serious tree trimming. No one lives there. Fifth and Jackson, Springfield, Illinois.”