|
*** UPDATED x2 *** Depressing charts
Thursday, Nov 13, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller *** UPDATE 1 *** I agree that the New York Times made an error here. From a commenter…
And…
Yep. *** UPDATE 2 *** Ah, OK. From another commenter…
* Man, turnout just sucked here. I mean, we were above the national average, but still… ![]() If that’s accurate, it’s horrible for Illinois. 2010 turnout was 51 percent. 2006 was the worst turnout year since I don’t know when, but it was still 49 percent. Also, why does Wisconsin get such a much higher turnout than Illinois? * Here are the below average states… ![]() So, we have one of the highest turnout states directly to our north, and the worst turnout state directly to our east. * Nationally, 2014 was the worst American turnout year since 1942, when millions were overseas fighting wars… ![]() ![]() And there you have it.
* Explanation…
Turnout was a big reason for polling failure this year. The models were just wrong and you can only poll people who answer their phones.
|
|
*** UPDATED x2 *** Rauner meets with Madigan, Cullerton
Thursday, Nov 13, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller * Subscribers already knew about this…
No word yet on what they spoke about. Guesses? *** UPDATE 1 *** Tribune…
Go read the whole thing. There’s lots more. *** UPDATE 2 *** I looks like the Tribune was tipped off about the meeting’s location, while the Sun-Times was shut out, but the CS-T does have some useful react…
|
|
Chicago Democrats supressed more turnout than the GOP could’ve ever done
Thursday, Nov 13, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller * David Ormsby dug up a memo from House Speaker Michael Madigan to Democrats dated October 31st. The memo included details of the “Sporadic Voter Program,” which was designed to increase turnout…
None of it worked. * But there’s something that Madigan and other Democrats appear to have overlooked. The Chicago Board of Elections is obviously woefully underfunded. Remember the tales of one to two-hour waits during early voting? There’s no better way to depress turnout than making people stand in line for two hours. Lots and lots of people just don’t have the patience or commitment to endure something like that. Mayor Emanuel, members of the city council and many others were enraged by the GOP robocall effort that they believed caused lots of Republican election judges to skip election day, thereby causing confusion and long lines. OK, maybe that happened, maybe not. But the hard truth is there are always long lines on election day in the city. The Board typically recruits and trains 10,000 judges or so. They need more judges to speed up the process. People ride by the polling place in the morning and see long lines and can’t vote because they’ll be late for work. They wait until after work and see even longer lines and just give up and go home. * And remember the city’s same-day registration/voting problems? Some people waited in line until 3 o’clock in the morning to vote. Who knows how many more saw those lines and walked away. Why did this happen? Well, the new state law mandated a minimum number of same day polling places. Cook County opened far more than the minimum requirements and didn’t have the sort of problems faced by Chicago, which operated at the bare minimum level. * In contrast, there’s almost never a line at my polling place. This year, three people were waiting in front of me and I was astonished. If the line had snaked out the front door and wrapped around the building, as it often does in Chicago, I probably wouldn’t have voted and made a mental note to vote early or by mail next time. I absolutely hate long lines. This goes back to the days when my parents worked for the Department of Defense overseas and we were forced to wait in endless lines to buy just about anything or to accomplish any government-related task. I told myself I would never, ever work for the federal government when I grew up. No more lines! I cannot possibly be alone in this. So, Speaker, Mayor, City Council, whomever, if you want more people to vote in Chicago next time, find more money to hire more judges and open more polling places to reduce the freakishly long lines. This ain’t rocket science! /rant
|
|
Sun-Times pushes their guy to cut a gun control deal
Thursday, Nov 13, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller * The Sun-Times editorial board is hopeful that the man they helped elect governor will now pursue some “sensible” gun control laws…
The thing about Cullerton is he’s always willing and open to cutting a deal. It’s in his bones. So, they may have a point. * The paper asked the Rauner campaign for a response…
Or not. But Rauner did say repeatedly during the campaign that Gov. Quinn had “failed” on the crime issue. It’s on him now to fix it.
|
|
Illinoisans to Tea Party: Meh
Thursday, Nov 13, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller * More from that poll by the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute…
Indifference is right. That crowd had little voice in this year’s election. I think it’ll be fascinating watching various conservative groups react to Bruce Rauner’s administration. He not only has the money to fend off any and all attacks from his right flank, but that mountain of cash can be really intimidating.
|
|
Caption contest!
Thursday, Nov 13, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller * Speaker Madigan on the phone back in the day… ![]()
|
|
Protected: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition
Thursday, Nov 13, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller
|
|
Protected: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today’s edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
Thursday, Nov 13, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller
|
| « NEWER POSTS | PREVIOUS POSTS » |













