The next gubernatorial election is still two years away, but Attorney General Lisa Madigan acknowledges she’s “thinking about” a run for the state’s top job.
Madigan didn’t offer any other hints Monday about a plan to challenge her fellow Democrat, Governor Rod Blagojevich, should he seek re-election.
Madigan says her immediate election goal is to get Democrat Barack Obama elected president in November.
* 2:17 pm - The governor’s quasi-dictatorial decision - blocked so far by two different courts - to start up a taxpayer funded program without legislative approval has resulted in severe consequences….
Illinois pharmacists must help pay for a health care program the Blagojevich administration bungled.
A notice from the Department of Healthcare and Family Services and obtained by The Associated Press tells pharmacies a court order precludes it from reimbursing prescriptions filled under the FamilyCare program Governor Rod Blagojevich expanded.
Illinois Pharmacists Association director Michael Patton says the druggists are out the money they spent for the medication, expecting to be reimbursed under FamilyCare. He says no one can tell him how much money pharmacists are losing.
* 4:10 pm - Buried in this puff piece about Attorney General Madigan are these somewhat surprisingly nice words by Ed Murnane, of all people…
Fears that Madigan would be a trial-happy opponent of tort reform groups have so far proven unfounded, said Ed Murnane, president of the Illinois Civil Justice League.
“She’s been a pleasant surprise to those of us who were concerned that she would be very closely aligned and sympathetic to plaintiffs’ lawyers,” said Murnane, who serves on the board of directors of the American Tort Reform Association.
Murnane noted that while Madigan would not be considered an ally of the tort reform movement, “She has not been the ogre some thought she was going to be.”
He said “problem attorneys general” are known for taking their consumer protection duties and responsibilities too far.
“I do not think that Lisa Madigan has gone overboard, at least not yet,” Murnane said. “She is probably to some extent trying to keep some of her powder dry because she is widely assumed to be keeping a pretty close eye on the governor’s office.”
* Long set-ups usually result in fewer responses, but we’re gonna try anyway. The Tribune has a very well-written, balanced piece on the state’s new “Citizens Participation Act,” which a pro-life group claims was misused against it. The whole thing started over the nasty fight about a Planned Parenthood center in Aurora. The right-to-life groups were doing their best to stop it and Planned Parenthood retaliated with some harsh words…
Scheidler sued Steve Trombley, president of Planned Parenthood of Illinois, alleging libel for saying to the Aurora City Council, and in an ad in a local newspaper, that the [Pro-Life Action League] has “a well-documented history of violence.”
* Planned Parenthood’s response to the suit…
“Illinois’ Citizen Participation Act . . . specifically protects the constitutional right to engage in the very type of speech that is at issue here,” Planned Parenthood said in a court filing.
Acts in furtherance of the constitutional rights to petition, speech, association, and participation in government are immune from liability, regardless of intent or purpose, except when not genuinely aimed at procuring favorable government action, result, or outcome.
It argues for dismissal on a variety of familiar grounds: because the allegedly defamatory statements were true, because they can be given an innocent construction, because they didn’t even refer to the individual plaintiffs.
But leading the list is the assertion that the Citizen Participation Act gives Planned Parenthood “absolute immunity against plaintiffs’ claims.” That’s because the organization was campaigning for local political support, and the CAP — to quote it — provides that “acts in furtherance of the constitutional rights to petition, speech, association, and participation in government . . . are immune from liability, regardless of intent or purpose” [emphasis added]
* Even the sponsor is a bit surprised that the law was used this way…
Illinois State Sen. John Cullerton called himself a Planned Parenthood supporter but acknowledged its use of the act was not what he had in mind when he pushed for it to become law. Still it is the judge’s decision as to “whether or not that law is appropriate to the facts,” he said.
* A bit more background…
[David Ardia, director of the Citizen Media Law Project at Harvard Law School] said anti-SLAPP laws got their start in the 1970s as environmentalists spoke out against big developers. “If we didn’t have them, we would have significantly reduced public speech on many, many important public issues,” Ardia said.
* Question: Does the state law go too far, or is it necessary to stop lawsuits which can chill free speech? Explain fully, please.
* The Tribune points out the glaring loophole in Illinois “revolving door” prohibition. The prohbition doesn’t work because waivers are too easy to get…
Last week, tollway chief Brian McPartlin announced that he was leaving to become a vice president of McDonough Associates, an engineering and architectural firm that has received more than $30 million in tollway contracts while McPartlin was in charge. He’s asking the state ethics commission for a waiver of the one-year rule, and he’ll almost certainly get it.
Per tollway rules, McPartlin played no role in the McDonough contracts, an agency spokeswoman says. And that’s likely good enough to satisfy the toothless law. Since 2005, 14 applications for waivers have been filed; only one was denied.
In seven of those cases, the ethics commission determined the applicant wasn’t substantially involved in a contract or regulatory decision that directly affected a prospective employer. That’s a pretty squishy requirement, especially when applied to agency chiefs, who are running the show regardless of who makes the day-to-day decisions. Does your boss need to be in the room to influence your decision-making? Probably not. Does that mean he’s not a player? Ha. […]
Granting waivers to employees who can demonstrate they have no conflict of interest sounds fair, in principle. But the law’s wording is so loose that it applies to only the most egregious conflicts, which is not to say that McPartlin’s situation is among them. But if Illinois is serious about stopping the revolving door, it needs to be more realistic about what constitutes a conflict of interest, and less generous about granting waivers. A prohibition doesn’t mean much if you can get a waiver simply by asking for one. [emphasis added]
Exactly.
* Speaking of ethics, the AP takes a nuanced approach to Barack Obama’s claims that he shepherded an earlier ethics bill through the GA…
“When I was in Illinois, I passed the toughest ethics reform in 25 years there, despite the opposition of Democrats and Republicans,” the Democratic presidential candidate told a New Hampshire audience last month.
In fact, Obama was part of an ensemble that negotiated the legislation and built support for it. And the ethics bill passed by lopsided margins of 52-4 in the Senate and 102-3 in the House, although its riskier moments came earlier during those behind-the-scene negotiations that Obama was heavily involved in.
As always with ethics bills, the behind-the-scenes negotiations are the most important part.
* The sticking point on this particular bill was the state’s practice of allowing politicians to convert all of their campaign funds to personal use. The old bulls, who controlled the process, made it clear that they wouldn’t move any bill that contained that language. So, they were essentially bought off with a “grandfather clause” that allowed the old-timers to keep their cash…
The grandfather clause allowed Illinois politicians to continue making personal use of a combined $15 million, an Associated Press analysis showed. Obama was eligible to convert just $14,000 to personal use and chose not to do so.
Obama’s campaign says the loophole was vital to the bill’s success. “Making the law apply retroactively was a poison pill that … would have killed the bill,” said spokesman Justin DeJong.
That’s true. Many old-timers didn’t see a need for an ethics bill at all, let alone one stripped “their money” from their pocketbooks.
Still, critics are right that the bill wasn’t exactly the be-all-end-all that Obama proclaims.
* Research 2000 is a decent polling outfit, but because the Democratic-biased Daily Kos site has commissioned polls from the firm, its surveys are getting short shrift. I wouldn’t be too sure about the detractors’ arguments. The polls look pretty legit to me, although there is room for argument about their “likely voter” screens. Nobody really knows yet who is going to vote and in what numbers.
Research 2000’s latest DK poll is of the Mark Kirk/Dan Seals congressional race. The methodology…
A total of 400 likely voters in the Tenth Congressional District were interviewed by telephone between September 30 and October 1, 2008.
Those interviewed were selected by the random variation of the last four digits of telephone numbers. A cross-section of exchanges was utilized in order to ensure an accurate reflection of the district. Quotas were assigned to reflect the voter registration of distribution by district.
The margin for error, according to standards customarily used by statisticians, is no more than plus or minus 5% percentage points.
That’s pretty standard stuff and the usual universe for congressional polling.
* And here’s the matchup, with Kirk’s September polling (just 300 respondents) in parentheses…
Kirk 44 (51)
Seals 38 (29)
* The head-to-head toplines….
* Kos’ conclusion…
To win, Seals must further erode Kirk’s support among Independents and even Democrats (currently at 12 percent), while getting his name ID up with his district’s electorate (29 percent don’t know him, including 32 percent of Independents).
* Meanwhile, Republican congressional candidate Aaron Schock appears to be back in the good graces of the Peoria paper. Check out this lede…
Aaron Schock is young, smart, handsome, rich and lucky.
The columnist goes on to show how Schock profited from flipping properties to public entitites and prominent local institutions like Bradley University. But, in the end, Schock gets a pass.
* I never believed for a second that the Chicago Tribune would endorse a “Yes” vote on the constitutional convention referendum. I figured their huffing and puffing over the ballot language shenanigans would give them political cover to oppose the referendum itself.
Decide right now that you’ll vote yes Nov. 4 on what could be the most important ballot measure you’ve ever encountered. Then relax as the establishment foes of a constitutional convention do their best Halloween act to scare the bejabbers out of you and every other citizen of Illinois.
And when their goblins fly at you, heads spinning, with their best “Bwaa-Haa-Haa!” about the dangers of a con-con, don’t flinch. They’ll screech that convention delegates—your fellow citizens—could try to raise tax formulas, or repeal individual rights, or steer planet Earth into the sun. Answer the bloodcurdling spirits with the mantra they cannot refute: Before our constitution actually would change—We . . . have . . . the . . . final . . . say. All of us. In another referendum. We have to vote proposed revisions up or down.
Wait, it gets better…
Vote yes because if this referendum proposal fails, you do have a guarantee: The sweet-smiling panderers who run this mismanaged state will give you 20 more years of what you have now.
You cannot challenge the interests that own too much of Illinois if you don’t climb into the ring with them.
Big finish…
Let the scaremongers tell you that democracy is dangerous for Illinois. Keep murmuring, We . . . have . . . the . . . final . . . say. Then vote yes on the con-con referendum proposal.
The Tribune muckety-mucks pal around with some of the big business types who staunchly oppose the referendum, and who also happen to advertise in their newspaper/radio/TV stations. That editorial took guts. Good for them.
* Meanwhile, Kurt Erickson, who has been a Statehouse reporter for years, comes as close as one can get to endorsing a “Yes” vote…
The last time the question was on the ballot was in 1988, when the call to revisit our government’s rule book was defeated by nearly 2 million votes.
Since then, we’ve watched the disparity between wealthy and poor areas of the state continue to grow when it comes to educating our children.
We’ve seen a governor go to jail. We’ve seen another governor become the focus of federal prosecutors as he’s presided over a government that is deeply insolvent.
We’ve watched the state’s legislative leaders amass grand powers to control what gets voted on - or doesn’t - in the House and Senate.
We’ve seen them disappear behind closed doors to negotiate out-of-balance budgets that are then sprung upon the rank-and-file lawmakers at the last minute, take it or leave it.
We’ve watched competitive races for the Legislature become few and far between because of the way legislative leaders have gerrymandered district maps to assure they keep their power intact.
Those types of issues could be addressed by a constitutional convention.
* Erickson is now the third Statehouse columnist to write favorably about a “Yes” vote. Scott Reeder endorsed it late last month. And then there’s me. That should tell you something. None of us have any skin in this game. We are honestly advising readers from first-hand experience and practically begging them to listen to our pleas.
* Related…
* Judge orders rewrite of Nov. 4 referendum question
Federal investigators are zeroing in on whether Tony Rezko paid for all or part of a $90,000 rehab of Gov. Blagojevich’s Northwest Side bungalow as the corruption probe of the state’s first family accelerates.
Since Rezko’s felony conviction in June, the FBI has been investigating how the former top Blagojevich fund-raiser billed the governor and his wife for the work, who paid for it and whether Rezko ever arranged for cash to be passed in envelopes to the Blagojeviches, several sources familiar with the probe told the Chicago Sun-Times.
A grand jury has issued at least one subpoena related to the project, according to the sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity. Agents also have inquired about the governor’s wife’s real estate dealings with Rezko and whether Rezko might have disguised payments for the work through sham billings at a large housing development he was building. […]
The questions about the Blagojevich house are part of a joint investigation by the FBI, IRS and U.S. Postal Inspection Service. Other aspects include whether the governor’s administration traded state posts or contracts for campaign cash and Patti Blagojevich’s real estate dealings.
How weird if the Gov (and his wife) end up imprisoned over home improvements when they could have lived on the Taxpayer’s dime in a mansion in Springfield.
* Related…
* Contractors dealt directly with gov’s wife, who ‘definitely knew what she wanted’
The 1,080 layoffs are projected by the Daley administration to save $98 million. They represent the biggest purge in Daley’s nearly 20-year tenure as mayor.
Izard, the Chicagoan who won the most recent season of Bravo TV’s “Top Chef,” is the latest famous face appearing on campaign materials for Tony Peraica, the Republican Cook County Board member running for state’s attorney.
“Our community would be further divided,” she said. “Children from the village of Sugar Grove would go to three different elementary schools. Our goal is to regain our sense of community.”
“Houses aren’t selling at the prices sellers are looking for, but they are still selling them for a profit,” said Naperville-based Coldwell Banker agent Gail Niermeyer.
Charged Friday with forging a name on a liquor license, Island Lake Mayor Thomas Hyde is the third current or former public official in the rural Lake County hamlet to be arrested since last year and accused of crimes related to their official duties.
heard at the National Archives that over sixty new books on Lincoln will be published during the bicentennial. I believe it, too; seems like everybody wants to get a new Lincoln title into print sometime soon.
* Sorry for your troubles, Cub fans, but us Sox fans still see some life in our team. I’d like to humbly suggest this theme song for today’sgame. Turn it all the way up…
* Attorney General Lisa Madigan’s spokesperson just called. She claimed the Tribune story quoted below about the Office of Executive Inspector General’s bizarre claims that students are covered under the state ethics law badly misquotes her office.
The state attorney general’s office said it was unclear how the state law applied to university employees and whether it applied to students.
Actually, the attorney general believes that students are not covered under the ethics law and, therefore, should not be subjected to the OEIG’s Orwellian ban of student participation in campus political events and activities.
There is less certainty, however, about university staff and faculty, and they’re looking into it.
However, the Associated Press appears to have picked up the Tribune item almost word for word this evening…
Attorney General Lisa Madigan’s office said it’s unclear how the ethics law applies to university staff and whether it affects students.
* We’re done here, but my work won’t stop because the legislative campaigns have kicked into high gear, so I’ll be working the phones most of the weekend and maybe making a couple of site visits. Hope your weekend is a good one, but make sure to stop by Illinoize and say hey.
* This week’s featured InsiderzExchange advertiser is Tom Speedie, who has his resume posted at this link. Tom’s a good guy, so go give that resume a look. While you’re over there, post an ad or calendar event at InsiderzExchange… it’s the place to be seen.
* If humans survive another billion years, there will never be anything approaching this man’s voice and style. Turn it up…
We’re all sensitive people
With so much to give
Go Sox.
* Oops. I forgot to congratulate Liz on her new baby. Ladies and gentlemen, Henry…
*** 2:20 pm *** I just got a call from someone at today’s con-con ballot problem court hearing. They’ve been at it since 9 this morning, and the hearing continues. Attorney General Madigan’s people are reportedly much more subdued than earlier this week.
You’ll know more when I know more.
* 1:02 pm - The US House has passed the financial bailout/rescue bill. The rollcall can be found at this link.
Three Illinoisans flipped from Monday’s vote: Republican Judy Biggert, and Democrats Jesse Jackson, Jr. and Bobby Rush.
Rep. Jerry Weller, the only member who didn’t vote last time, voted “Yes” today. Here are the “Yes” votes. Those who have any sort of opposition this November are in bold…
* 1:46 pm - Judy Biggert’s rationale for flipping…
“The volatility in the market is threatening the financial stability of my constituents,” Biggert said. “It is clear that the time for seeking better options has run out. If we don’t act now, those who are least to blame for this mess will suffer the most.”
Black lawmakers said personal calls from Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama helped switch them from ‘‘no’’ to ‘‘yes.’’
* From a Jackson press release…
Congressman Jesse L. Jackson Jr. said today he will support an emergency rescue package for the nation’s troubled financial system after getting assurances from Senator Barack Obama that, as president, they “would aggressively regulate predatory lending and force mortgage modifications to prevent foreclosures.”
FBI agents met with Will County Auditor Stephen Weber for two hours Wednesday morning regarding an investigation the auditor initiated into a countywide office, the Tribune has learned. […]
Sources say the investigation centers on Will County Executive Larry Walsh’s office.
The FBI on Wednesday raided the county offices of a former Illinois state senator who is a poker-playing buddy of Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama.
At 9:45 a.m., Chicago agent Joseph Basile and another man walked into the offices of Will County Auditor Steve Weber. They walked back out again just after 11 a.m.
That was it. They talked to Weber for a bit over an hour and left. There was no “raid” of Walsh’s office. The Washington Times completely flubbed its story.
The Republican challenger to Will County Executive Larry Walsh sparked what has turned into an FBI examination of Walsh’s connections to a county contractor.
* And it apparently has something to do with campaign contributions to a county vendor…
Dan Kennison, Walsh’s opponent in the November election, said Thursday that he began asking questions about $6,500 given to Walsh’s campaign by individuals who turned out to have family connections to Smith Dawson and Andrews, the lobbying firm hired by the county.
“I gave that information to Mr. Weber,” Kennison said. Kennison said he also has spoken with the FBI, but would not provide details.
Kennison denied any involvement with what happened at the auditor’s office.
“I had nothing to do with this investigation. What I know about this is what I’ve read,” he said, but he added that he thought an investigation should be conducted.
What Kennison “read” in at least one paper was his quote about how he started the whole thing.
Looks like a setup to me.
* Walsh’s response to the campaign contribution stuff…
“I have known the Smiths, and Francis and Jim Smith have been very good friends of mine since I started as a state senator representing Kankakee County,” Walsh said. “If I’m guilty of taking a donation from a family friend, then God help us.”
A central Illinois man says Secretary of State Jesse White has given him permission to build a nativity scene inside the Capitol Rotunda in December.
Daniel Zanoza of Lincoln says the scene, which depicts the birth of Jesus, will celebrate Christmas and show religious displays shouldn’t be banned from public buildings.
A spokesman for the Illinois office of the American Civil Liberties Union says the agency is reviewing the state’s policy on religious articles in state buildings.
* The question: Should SoS White have allowed this nativity display? Explain fully, please.
…university students, not just employees, were prohibited from participating in political rallies on campus—an assertion at odds with the University of Illinois’ interpretation of the law.
“Anything that benefits a political campaign is prohibited on state property,” said Gilbert Jimenez, deputy inspector general. The results of any investigations of campus activity would be turned over the university’s board of trustees with recommendations for discipline, including possible dismissal, Jimenez said.
So, that means Republican, Democratic and other student political clubs would likely be banned from meeting on campus, despite decades of precedence. And the clubs’ faculty sponsors would be prohibited from attending or probably even being sponsors. Also, under this interpretation, universities could no longer host candidate debates. If anybody complains, the OEIG would launch an investigation. Wonderful.
The state attorney general’s office said it was unclear how the state law applied to university employees and whether it applied to students.
Great. How about an interpretation, for crying out loud?
* The U of I claims it won’t enforce the law…
Tom Hardy, a University of Illinois spokesman, said Thursday that the university only wanted to inform its employees of the law and had no intention of enforcing it. The university, he said, would take no action against participants in the pro-Obama rally [held yesterday on campus to protest the goofy rules].
The problem here is that the university could selectively enforce the law down the road in order to get rid of particularly problemmatic faculty, staff or students.
Either the General Assembly needs to change the law or the attorney general needs to do her job and give the universities some guidance here.
…Adding… By the OEIG’s insane logic, both of Barack Obama’s rallies at the Old State Capitol were illegal.
Democratic and Republican days at the Illinois State Fair are also therefore illegal, as are the political party tents at the fairgrounds.
If a college student wears a political buton on the U of I’s quad, can s/he be kicked out of school? Could that same person be kicked off the fairgrounds? I’ve seen plenty of private citizens wearing campaign buttons at the Statehouse. Would that be prohibited as well?
One other point. I spoke to a Democratic women’s organization at the governor’s mansion a few years ago (where I was heartily booed for the first and, so far, only time at a speaking engagement). Since members of the group spoke on behalf of specific politicians that evening, would that sort of meeting be against the law now, too?
…More food for thought… Since the constitutional convention is on the ballot this November, and since both sides of that issue have formed and registered their respective official campaign committees with the State Board of Elections and are actively campaigning, it’s also worth wondering if an upcoming debate at UIUC put together by my intern Kevin Fanning would be banned. Here’s Kevin’s comments from below…
I’m hosting a debate on the merits of the Constitutional Convention at the University of Illinois on Oct. 15h, and the Lt. Gov will be participating. Everyone is encouraged to come, especially the Governor and the deputy Inspector General.
* More…
* Column: Pres. White should retract ethics policy
* You may have seen this story on Drudge today about California Gov. Schwarzenegger warning that his state may need a $7 billion emergency federal loan.
Illinois finished the first three months of its budget year with a mountain of unpaid bills and record delays in payments, Comptroller Dan Hynes says in a new report.
Worse, the report said, with the state’s economy still faltering, the backlog of bills and payment delays “will experience an even greater increase by the end of the calendar year and beyond.” […]
As of Tuesday, the report said, more than $1.8 billion worth of bills were sitting in the comptroller’s office that couldn’t be paid because the state didn’t have the money. A year ago at this time, Hynes’ office had nearly $1.4 billion in bills waiting to be paid.
It’s also taking longer to pay those bills once they reach Hynes’ office. The payment delay is 42 working days, “a historical record at this time of year.” That counts only the time after Hynes office receives a bill for payment. Often, state agencies hold on to bills before submitting them to the comptroller’s office, which is responsible for writing the checks.
That last sentence is extremely important. The payment cycle is not what it appears to be because agencies “manage” their budget by holding onto invoices before submitting them to the comptroller for payment.
The failure of the Illinois Department of Human Services to pay overdue bills of more than $400,000 to Human Services Center of Southern Illinois forced a shutdown on Monday, September 29, the agency announced at a press conference held Friday afternoon.
As of Monday, Human Services Center laid off 27 employees—32% of staff. The staff layoff has reduced mental health and development disability care to 100-300 current clients and denied care to the 35-40 new individuals who seek care each month. […]
“We have pleaded with the Department of Human Services and Secretary Carol Adams for payment of its overdue bills, and we have warned the state that we would have to fire staff, slash care, and turn people away without immediate payment,” said Gary Buatte, Executive Director. “The state has failed to pay—so that day has come.”
Delayed state payments to several social service agencies such as Crosspoint have prompted several to seek bank loans or use lines of credit to make payroll, organizers said.
Until recently, Crosspoint was on the brink of not being able to pay its 200 employees because of slow and delayed state payments.
But legislators intervened to speed up about $820,000 in state payments to the agency.
That, said Executive Director Thom Pollock, “takes us into November.”
If you’re a state worker, or work for a social services provider, please tell us your horror stories in comments.
* Retiring Congresscritter Jerry Weller finally surfaced this week. Weller missed last week’s vote on the financial system bailout bill and wouldn’t return reporters’ calls. He was the only member of the US House who missed the vote. At one point this week, GOP state Rep. Bill Mitchell called on Weller to resign if he couldn’t handle his duties. Weller also missed an important vote on the EJ&E Railroad expansion issue. Not a good thing. Last month alone, Weller missed 71 votes.
“In hindsight, missing votes over the past week was a mistake, and I apologize to my constituents for missing those votes,” Weller said in a phone call from Washington, D.C. […]
Weller…said he stayed home in Morris because of a medical matter concerning his family, reiterating an explanation given earlier by his staff. Weller was in Washington on Thursday, waiting for a vote on a new version of the rescue plan. […]
Several local political and community leaders said they have not talked with Weller or seen him in months. Among those was Frankfort Mayor Jim Holland, who said he tried repeatedly to talk with Weller about the Canadian National proposal.
Weller said he was puzzled by Holland’s inability to reach him.
“If Mayor Holland has called me, I didn’t know he was trying to reach me,” Weller said. “He has my personal cell phone number.”
Maybe so, but Weller could’ve at least called the guy back. I’m sure Weller’s office also has his cell number.
* Weller is in DC and will vote today. The US House will vote on the Senate-approved and renamed “financial rescue” proposal sometime today. But two central Illinois members won’t change their “No” votes to “Yes”…
“I’m a ‘no.’ I haven’t moved,” [GOP Rep. John Shimkus] said. “It fundamentally destroys, or has the possibility of destroying, the free market system in this country.” […]
[GOP Rep. Tim Johnson] spokesman Phil Bloomer said the congressman also won’t veer from his earlier “no” vote.
“He’s even more angry about it than he was before,” Bloomer said, citing the legislation’s inclusion of “special interest tax breaks” such as one targeting rum production in Puerto Rico.
During his answer to the first question of the debate — how the candidates would vote on the bailout bill — Ozinga said, “My opponent (Halvorson) doesn’t understand the seriousness of the situation.”
Ozinga, president of a concrete and material supply company, said he would have voted for the bill.
Halvorson said she did understand the situation, but she would have voted against the bill as presented to the U.S. House on Monday.
In addition to giving her time to answer the question, the debate moderators gave Halvorson the only 30-second rebuttal opportunity of the evening to answer Ozinga’s claim.
“It’s just a shame to continue to point fingers,” Halvorson said in her rebuttal. “Let’s talk about what we are for instead of trying to play the blame game.”
* In another race, Republican incumbent Mark Kirk is piling up the cash…
U.S. Rep. Mark Kirk (R-Highland Park) said he raised another $850,000 over the summer as he continues to pile up cash in a rematch race against Democrat Dan Seals.
The fundraising totals Kirk’s campaign released say the four-term congressman has collected $4.6 million so far. The campaign says that’s $1.4 million more than it raised during the 2006 race.
The largest deployment of Illinois National Guard troops since World War II is preparing to head to Afghanistan to help battle a growing insurgency, while families ready for life without husbands, wives, fathers, mothers, sons and daughters.
The 2,700 soldiers of the 33rd Infantry Brigade Combat Team will ship out this month - some for pre-mission training, others to their posts in Afghanistan, where they will help train the Afghan national police force, said Col. Scott Thoele, who commands the brigade.
The shocker: Last month, more than 18,100 homes in Chicago were without electricity, according to the city Environment Department. ComEd — which would not provide statistics, saying that’s against company policy — says the numbers this year aren’t much different from years past. But the Office of Environment tells Sneed 10,000 homes were without electricity last November.
Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan is pushing the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission and retailers to do more to publicize recalls. A better informed public, she has found, is the best solution.
“This is why my office initiated a new teen driver safety law, effective January 1, 2008, that gives Illinois one of the strongest graduated driver licensing (GDL) programs in the nation,” White said. “The new law better prepares teen drivers by tripling the length of the permit phase, increasing parental involvement, limiting in-car distractions and strengthening penalties.”
Attention passengers and Cubs fans. We are standing here waiting for a train at Addison to move. Then we’ll pull into Addison and you can watch the Cubs LOSE.
Cook County Assessor James Houlihan is moving to take a lucrative tax break from Loyola University Chicago and the Franciscan Sisters religious order.
In an unusual step likely to draw strong protests from the two prominent Roman Catholic institutions, Mr. Houlihan late last week quietly issued a preliminary ruling that a posh residential retirement development involving the two on the Near North Side is subject to property tax, rather than being exempt, like most land owned by religious groups.
