We’re proud to be celebrating Illinois Review’s 7th anniversary this month, and wanted to take a moment to communicate our sincerest thanks to all the incredible IR contributors we’ve had through the years. It is our goal to remain solid and steady together through rocky times ahead in Illinois’ political future. Our mission to promote limited government, individual rights, free markets, and traditional values remains firm.
We also want to thank you, our readers, for your encouragement, your criticisms and your interest. We proceed full steam ahead into Year Number 7, serving you as the crossroads of Illinois’ conservative community.
I started my own blog about seven years ago, in October of 2004. CapitolFax.com has been around since, I think, 1998. It was mainly a comprehensive link site back then. Many of the pull-down link sets in the middle column originated on that site. Then, somewhere around the early ’00s I started adding a daily “snippet” of subscriber content, but I eventually decided to do the blog thing using the blogspot system. You can see the bare remnants of that blog here. I eventually moved to the WordPress platform so I could moderate comments and block morons from posting their bilge. Not long after that, I caught Gov. Blagojevich’s campaign posing as conservative Republicans in order to attack Judy Baar Topinka. Heh. Ever since I can remember, I always wanted to post headline feeds from newspapers around the state, and as soon as somebody started a company to do that I began displaying them on the blog.
Anyway, enough of this memory lane stuff. I have things to do today. So, let’s get to the question. We’ve done this before, but it was a long time ago…
* The Question: What is your favorite non-Illinois politics/news/other blog or website? Explain.
* There’s been a lot of grumbling out there that maybe the Democrats lining up to run against Republican Bob Dold in the northern suburbs might not be First Tier types. They’ve raised cash, and they’ve been working hard, but they haven’t generated a ton of buzz and local leaders have not rushed to support them.
John Tree, a businessman and Air Force reservist who has worked in Israel with the Israeli Air Force, is jumping in the 10th District Democratic primary, joining the two other major contenders who want to defeat freshman Rep. Bob Dold (R-Ill.).
Tree’s late entry in the race comes as Democrats Ilya Sheyman and Brad Schneider have been campaigning for months in the north suburban and North Shore communities–but neither has solidified Democratic support.
“Democrats are hungry for a win and ready to work for it,” said Lauren Beth Gash, Democratic state central committeewoman for the 10th District. “…They are looking for a candidate they can get strongly behind.”
Gash said Tree was an “incredibly impressive candidate which is not to say the other candidates in the race aren’t.”
Tree makes his candidacy official on Thursday. He already has mustered a team of political professionals with experience in Illinois campaigns.
“No one has really consolidated Democratic support” in the tenth said Peter Giangreco, a Tree advisor who will also handle his direct mail. “There have been a few endorsements but there is nobody who can really talk about jobs and deliver a critique of Bob Dold in the way John Tree can.”
* The Jewish vote is extremely important in the 10th CD, and Tree’s campaign is emphasizing his work with the Israeli Air Force…
In 1995, Tree served as Chief of West Mediterranean Logistics for the 16th Air Force, responsible for logistics support for Tunisia, Morocco and Israel. John was on the ground in Israel on twelve different occasions collaborating with the Israeli Air Force on military security. His security clearance allowed him to see realities that most Americans don’t see, fueling his strong support for the State of Israel.
Tree is currently a colonel in the Air Force Reserve. He’s also and MBA who worked for Procter & Gamble and Kellogg as well as run a small business.
Greene County State’s Attorney Matt Goetten announced today he’s decided to take the plunge and seek the Democratic nomination for the U.S. House seat in the new 13th Congressional District.
“I am running to serve middle class families by creating jobs and stopping the erosion of our future coming out of Congress today,” Goetten said in a statement.
“Whether it was serving our country overseas or standing up for victims of Greene County, I have risen to the call of duty throughout my life. I can no longer stand by and watch as a passive observer while teaching my children to stand by their convictions. We owe our kids a sound future, but Congress isn’t giving them a chance to get ahead.”
Goetten, 39, who was first elected as state’s attorney in 2004, a member of the Illinois Air National Guard, was deployed to Afghanistan in 2009 as a judge advocate general with the Illinois Army National Guard.
* Goetten started out as the backup in case former state Rep. Jay Hoffman decided not to run. A month ago, after Hoffman announced for Johnson’s seat, he predictably dropped out…
“I can still see Afghanistan in my rear view mirror, and that was nine months that I can’t get back with my kids. And so, looking forward at the potential of a fifteen-month congressional race and the time away from home, it was just the determination that I made that my family is more important to me at the current time than seeking higher office in Congress,” he explains.
* But then when Hoffman announced a bid for the Illinois House and dropped out of the congressional race, Goetten decided he’d made his decision and was going to stick with it…
At a recent Champaign County Democratic Party dinner, Goetten repeated that family considerations would keep him from running for Congress in 2012.
* Not long after Goetten’s reiteration, some district politicos announced their support for Dr. David Gill, who has run against Johnson three times before. From a November 2nd press release…
David Gill announced [Nov. 2] that he has been endorsed by State Representative Naomi Jakobsson and Illinois Senator (retired) Deanna Demuzio, as well as by Champaign County Board Chairman C Pius Weibel, Urbana Alderman Eric Jakobsson, former 13th District candidate James Gray and the Jersey County Democratic Party and its chairman, Mark Pohlman. Madison County’s Southern Illinois People for Progress and its chairman, former 19th District state central committee candidate Pam Gronemeyer, also have endorsed and are supporting Gill.
Thursday, Nov 10, 2011 - Posted by Advertising Department
[The following is a paid advertisement.]
Tenaska is still pushing hard for the legislature to approve their plan to build the Taylorville Energy Center. A look at the numbers makes it clear why the Senate should vote “NO” on SB 678.
No matter what way you do the math, these numbers add up to a raw deal for Illinois consumers.
* Illinois Statehouse News makes a good point about the tax cut debate, including funding part of it for a couple years by decoupling from a federal tax law…
To pay for all of this lawmakers are looking at decoupling the state from a federal tax code that allows businesses to get deductions on capital investments all at once instead of over a series of years. […]
That move, however, would only generate $570 million in the first year and $354 million in the second year before disappearing. […]
There are other businesses that could use the money from decoupling more than CME and Sears, some argue. The state owes between $4 billion and $5 billion in overdue bills to state vendors, schools and small businesses that the state contracts will.
“They employ people (and) we are doing nothing here by way of paying any back bills,” state Rep. David Harris, R-Arlington Heights, said.
Advocates of paying off the state’s old bills say doing so would allow those owed to avoid furloughs, layoffs or even closing, thus keeping tax revenue from those workers and businesses flowing into state coffers.
* The House Revenue Committee met today for a brief hearing and then scheduled more hearings next week. The committee will meet Wednesday and Friday. The delay over finding a resolution to the tax cut package caused the House to add at least one more session day this month…
Before adjourning for the day Wednesday, House members were told the six-day veto session would be extended at least one day. The House has added Nov. 21 to its calendar.
On Wednesday, CME’s executive chairman Terry Duffy backed off his earlier prediction that what happened in Springfield this week would determine whether his multi-billion dollar company would remain in Chicago where it began 163 years ago.
“My board will take as much time as necessary to deliberate where our future headquarters should be or not be,” Duffy told ABC7.
Terrence Duffy, CME Group’s executive chairman, reiterated Wednesday that he cannot make any assurances as to what his board will do now regarding a future location of major operations. But he said his company would remain open to any Illinois proposals that emerge in the next couple of weeks.
“I expressed my disappointment, in that I was told for months now that we’d get an answer in this fall’s veto session,” Duffy said Wednesday evening after a brief meeting with Gov. Pat Quinn. “But as the governor pointed out to us, the fall veto session is not over if they are going to come back. So that was cute.”
The company continues to evaluate offers from other states, which he called “very economically appealing.”
But it’s not an overnight process, he said, adding that “it takes time to navigate something of our size.”
Legislative leaders would like to deal with the problem during a separate special session at the end of the month.
“So if that happens, then we will just make a decision, do we want to stay here and pay $158 million in corporate taxes, 6% of the bill and the number one taxpayer, or reevaluate taking the company somewhere else where it is an environment that respects and understands our business.,” said Duffy.
I’m told that at least one other state has upped its bid and meetings have been scheduled.
Duffy likes to say that his company has been in Chicago for 163 years, so why he can’t wait eleven more days for action seems a bit excessive to me, especially when he said in September that he could wait until January.
Then again, like most businessmen, he does seem raring to go to get something done right now. I don’t blame him for that. But the legislative process requires some patience. And eleven days isn’t really too much to ask.
*** UPDATE 1 *** If you’re watching the veto session live blog, you know that the House has adjourned until November 29th. That date is different than the Nov. 21st date given to House members yesterday. The gaming bill wasn’t called for a vote.
Gov. Pat Quinn scored a victory Wednesday night during an otherwise difficult fall session by helping to defeat a controversial gambling expansion bill in the Illinois House.
The revised gambling bill sponsored by state Rep. Lou Lang (D-Skokie) incorporated many changes Quinn requested, including granting the Illinois Gaming Board tighter control over five proposed casinos in Chicago, the south suburbs, Danville, Lake County and Rockford.
But the legislation kept a provision allowing slot machines to be installed at the state’s five race tracks, which was a deal-breaker for Quinn and for a few lawmakers who changed their minds since the original measure passed in May. The revised bill failed by a vote of 58-53. A roll call vote was not immediately available. The original gambling expansion measure passed in May with 65 votes.
Lang swiftly moved the failed bill to “postponed consideration,” a parliamentary move that would allow him to bring it back for a vote. But Wednesday’s vote may table the controversial legislation for the time being.
* Lang told me this morning that despite the fact that Gov. Quinn “used tons of resources and people in state government,” to work against his bill, Quinn “flipped exactly zero votes.” The Trib says Mayor Rahm Emanuel also worked the roll call…
Quinn called some lawmakers to try to block the measure as Illinois Gaming Board Chairman Aaron Jaffe contended the new version was “still a pile of junk” despite efforts by supporters to craft a bill to meet some of the governor’s concerns.
On the other side, Emanuel talked to legislators in an attempt to gain support.
Lang and other lawmakers harangued Quinn several times during the debate, rants akin to the ones that used to be directed at Rod Blagojevich. Lang accused Quinn of hypocrisy for saying that he is for jobs but against the addition of slot machines at racetracks, which Lang said would save thousands of horse-industry jobs.
“His response was, ‘No! I’m not interested in agribusiness jobs in the state of Illinois.’ ‘No! I’m not interested in helping central and southern Illinois,’” Lang said. “Even though there is already gambling at racetracks, we’re going to count these as new casinos. How ridiculous. How bsurd.
“Aren’t you angry at this slap in the face? Doesn’t it concern you that the chief executive of our state – one who has talked about job creation, one who has talked about economic development, one who has campaigned on these issues – would stand at a microphone and the part of the bill that most affects you – he said that’s the first thing that needs to go.”
* Whether or not this was a win for Quinn, it was certainly a loss for Lang, Emanuel and the other proponents. Lang’s bill received 58 votes yesterday, two shy of a simple majority, seven fewer than his original bill received in the spring and thirteen votes short of a veto-proof majority…
“This bill is a better bill than the one we passed with 65 votes,” Lang said before his bill failed. “It’ll pay $1 billion in old bills. It’ll put $1 billion into state coffers. It’ll put people to work. We took the changes the governor wanted, even though he wouldn’t sit at the table with us, and put those in the bill.”
[Eisenhauer] said some lost votes can be attributed to three legislators no longer there due to death and resignation for two of them, and two who supported the bill in the spring were not there Wednesday.
“I think you can get back to 60 (votes),” Eisenhauer said.
“Like every other hurdle we’ve had to jump over, we will regroup, dust ourselves off and start meeting with (legislators) …,” he added.
Eisenhauer said he’d be surprised if the bill came back up today.
“(Nov.) 21st is a possibility or it could go back to the spring legislative session,” he said.
* In other Quinn vs. the General Assembly news, the Tribune obtained the letter from Legislative Inspector General Tom Homer to the governor about why he closed his “Buttongate” probe. Quinn had demanded the investigation…
The practice of one lawmaker voting the button of his legislative seatmates is widespread, though officially not allowed. In a memo to Quinn, Homer wrote that the voting rule was violated but that he found no evidence of “malicious intent” nor any conspiracy by House leadership or the bill sponsor in how the vote went down.
“As a result, I do not believe the matter rises to the level of an ethics violation actionable by my office. Nor do I recommend that the Legislative Ethics Commission take any official action with respect to the matter,” Homer wrote.
* Remember when Gov. Pat Quinn moved Illinois Power Agency Director Mark Pruitt out of office? Quinn was upset that Pruitt wasn’t moving fast enough on signing long-term alternative energy power contracts. He replaced Pruitt with retired ComEd executive Arlene Juracek. But Juracek quickly voided Pruitt’s work on alt energy and “clean coal” plants…
In an unexpected move, [Juracek] reversed Mr. Pruitt’s plan to solicit offers for 20-year contracts for wind farm developers — a priority of Mr. Quinn, who sees green jobs growth as a major part of his economic development agenda for the state. Instead, she plans to solicit offers for one-year contracts only, which the wind industry has complained won’t foster development of new wind farms in the state because developers can’t get financing unless they have long-term sales contracts. […]
In addition, Ms. Juracek reversed Mr. Pruitt’s plan to solicit bids for power from “clean-coal” plants, a provision aimed at allowing the developers of the proposed FutureGen 2.0 project to finance the part of the project not subsidized by the U.S. Department of Energy. FutureGen is a top priority of Mr. Quinn.
* Well, yesterday, the House overwhelmingly passed a measure that essentially fires Acting Director Juracek. From the amendment’s synopsis…
Provides the Executive Ethics Commission with the ability to appoint Acting and Temporary Directors of the Illinois Power Agency, and limits Acting Directors to 60-day terms. Effective immediately.
Nothing in this subsection shall prohibit the Executive Ethics Commission from removing an acting Director or from appointing an acting Director as the Director of the Illinois Power Agency.
Gov. Quinn can’t directly control the EEC, which is why the commission was given the authority.
* And just for good measure, the proposal forbids Juracek’s reappointment if the Senate refuses to confirm her…
No person rejected by the Senate for the office of Director of the Illinois Power Agency shall, except at the Senate’s request, be nominated again for that office at the same session or be appointed to that office during a recess of that Senate.
The Senate’s State Government and Veterans Affairs Committee meets today at 10:10 am to take up the proposal.
[I was looking at two synopses at once, and somehow mistook one roll call for another. Headline and content updated to reflect the proper roll call. That’s what I get for doing too many things at once. Oops.]
*** UPDATE *** With a hat tip to a commenter, the proposal was unanimously approved by a Senate committee today. And, yes, the vote was really unanimous. I double checked the status page just to make sure.
* Subscribers know far more details about this, but Kurt Erickson’s story is right. There’s a deal on the table right now to avoid immediate facility closures and layoffs. However, there’s a catch…
As part of an 11th-hour budget agreement being brokered with lawmakers, Quinn would agree to close four state developmental centers and two mental health facilities within the next 2 ½ years, rather than shut down seven facilities next month.
While not explicitly targeting the Jacksonville Developmental Center, a “rebalancing initiative” being put forward by the governor outlines a plan to close up to four developmental centers and at least two mental health facilities in the next two-and-a-half years. It would also move at least 600 residents of developmental centers into community settings. […]
The plan involves selecting one of the state’s eight developmental centers for closure and halting admissions. Assessment of all residents and development of transition care plans would begin in December and 20 residents a month would be transferred starting in January until the first developmental center is able to be closed. The process would then repeat until up to four centers are closed.
For state Rep. Mike Bost, R-Murphysboro, the potential deal could be a double-edged sword. Although the Murphysboro youth center could be spared, it could put the Choate Developmental Center in Anna in the cross-hairs for future closure.
“It’s frustrating. This has been the way Quinn works. He tests the wind and then changes his mind. We need a leader,” Bost said.
State Sen. John O. Jones, R-Mount Vernon, said Quinn’s actions were similar to former Gov. Rod Blagojevich, who also threatened to close facilities.
“What is he thinking? He is doing a great job of following Rod Blagojevich’s lead, threatening Vandalia and Pontiac twice, and now he’s responded with two poorly executed closure plans,” Jones said. […]
“Governor Quinn is under fire for his irresponsible push to cut mental health care, force people with severe developmental disabilities out of the homes they have chosen, and destroy thousands of middle-class jobs,” said AFSCME spokesman Anders Lindall. “Spreading that pain out over the coming years doesn’t make it any less wrong.”
So, the big question now is whether the deal to keep facilities open and provide funding for shorted programs elsewhere in the budget is endangered by the deal to close state facilities down the road. Stay tuned.
Mayor Emanuel will make a brief visit to Claremont Academy, located within two blocks of the W. 63rd Street and S. Western Avenue intersection which records the 6th highest number of pedestrian crashes in Chicago, and is positioned within a new safety zone designated by legislation passed yesterday by the Illinois House that allows Automated Speed Enforcement.
[ *** End Of Update *** ]
* Gov. Pat Quinn has not yet said exactly how he feels about this bill. But if projections are correct, the speed cam legislation could generate an absolute ton of revenue for Chicago. If Quinn vetoes it, following his veto of the gaming bill, Mayor Rahm Emanuel is gonna have a fit…
The Illinois House handed Mayor Rahm Emanuel a lucrative victory at the Statehouse Wednesday, passing to Gov. Pat Quinn a measure authorizing speed-enforcement cameras around city parks and schools. […]
The speed-camera proposal that only applies to Chicago passed the House 64-50 and was billed by its backers as a tool to improve pedestrian safety, particularly among children. […]
Under the legislation, the City Council could approve the cameras after July 1, 2012.
Quinn, who has not voiced opposition to the idea, would not divulge his position on the measure. A spokeswoman would say only that the governor intended to review it.
The follow-up legislation that passed the House and pending in the Senate would make the following changes:
*Speeders going 6 mph 10 mph over the limit would face $50 fines instead of $100. Those going 11 mph and over would face the full $100 ticket.
*The cameras would run in school zones from 6 a.m. to 8:30 p.m. Monday through Thursday and from 6 a.m. to 9 p.m. on Friday. The cameras would only operate on school days in school zones. The cameras near city parks would still run one hour before opening until one hour after closing.
*Money would go toward increasing school safety and school transportation, with some earmarked for after-school programs.
* The Senate is in at 8:40 am, the House is in at ten. Two House committees are meeting this morning, Revenue at 8:30 and Executive at 9:30. You can watch them both by clicking here. COGFA’s hearing on facility closures started at 8 o’clock.
* Live House audio/video is here. Live Senate audio/video is here. BlackBerry users click here. iPad and iPhone users remember to use the “two-finger” scrolling method…
* At the end of the first week of veto session, Gov. Pat Quinn demanded that the General Assembly’s Inspector General investigate what the media quickly termed “Buttongate.” As you’ll recall, about 20 Democratic members were off the House floor attending one of the day’s three scheduled budget briefings when the ComEd “Smart Grid trailer bill” was called for a vote. Several opponents of the bill were voted “Yes” by others in the chamber…
“The people of Illinois, I think, back home, if they hear that their legislator was letting some staff member vote their switch, or somebody next door to them who wasn’t elected by the people back home, this is not right,” Quinn said during a stop in Normal in central Illinois on Friday. “And the legislators know this. And I think any wrongdoing there, any monkey business, needs to be investigated by the proper authority.”
* Anyway, I just received this e-mail from Inspector General Tom Homer…
I sent a letter to the Governor on Monday relative to the voting procedures on House Bill 3036. I also have provided copies of my letter to the four leaders through their respective legal counsel. In addition, I submitted my report to the Legislative Ethics Commission this morning and provided the commission members with copies of my letter to the Governor.
While I am not able to discuss the particulars, I have no plans at this time to pursue the matter further and consider it closed.
Apparently, there was no there there. No surprise. Quinn completely overreacted.
*** UPDATE *** If you’re watching our veto session live blog, you already know that the revised regional superintendent funding bill just passed the House after two tries. The bill now goes to the Senate.
Under the governor’s new proposal, the Department of Human Services would reduce the number of residents served by state-operated developmental centers by at least 600. That would allow the agency to close up to four of the state’s eight developmental centers by the summer of 2014.
An outline of the proposal did not identify which facilities, including centers in Anna, Dwight, Dixon and Centralia, may be on the future chopping block.
The new plan also calls for the closure of two unidentified state psychiatric hospitals by mid-2014. The proposal would at least temporarily end Quinn’s threat to close Logan Correctional Center and the youth prison in Murphysboro. […]
It appeared Quinn’s decision to cut money for school transportation costs may stand, leaving local districts scrambling to pay for busing.
“There’s not a lot of support for education in the negotiating room,” said state Rep. Will Davis, D-Chicago.
Less than two weeks after an earlier proposal fell 12 votes short of passage in the House, state Rep. Frank Mautino, D-Spring Valley, said he was still rounding up support for a package that would dip into a fund dedicated to local governments for the $13 million needed for the salaries.
He said he’s included a number of legislative tweaks that could draw enough support to move the proposal to the Senate for further action during the final two days of the General Assembly’s fall veto session. […]
Cities, counties and school districts say the money should come from a different source, but Mautino and supporters say the one-time use of the money can correct what they see as a mistake by Gov. Pat Quinn.
* In other news, the Southern Illinoisan published an editorial slamming striking SIU faculty members. The edit is entitled “Go to work, or get out!”…
Striking faculty members at SIU Carbondale have no valid issues. They should return to the classroom today or be replaced Monday.
For anyone driving Thursday on U.S. 51 near Southern Illinois University the sight of pickets at the campus’ main entrances was both historic and emotional. Striking faculty got salutes and toots of the horn from supporters, but a larger group of motorists responded with silent stares or insulting hand gestures.
Were they angry or offended? It is an interesting question to consider as the first strike at SIU moves into a second day. Our region is chronically beset with poverty and joblessness - troubles exacerbated by the nation’s deep and long recession. Employment at SIU is a career goal for many, a source of envy for many more.
It was especially troubling to see the highest-paid, most-protected class of workers, the Faculty Association representing tenured and tenure-track educators, feigning hardship because of their inability to attain what they loftily describe as a “fair contract.” What actually is being sought, and won’t be attained, are ridiculous demands they say are not financial.
In their own words, the FA said it has been offered raises of 0, 1, 1 and 2 percent in the coming four years of a proposed contract. When was your last raise? Can you even remember?
The stumbling blocks for the FA are differences over a new conflict of interest policy, and the procedures following sexual harassment claims. The FA also opposes the tuition hikes needed to yield the raises, wants a say on what constitutes financial hardship for SIU, insists on linking any raises to improved revenues at SIU and makes nonsensical demands for transparency and accountability in matters of tenure. All are senior-level-management issues, but it would be interesting to see what faculty strikers say accepting wage cuts if SIU revenues decrease.
Wednesday, Nov 9, 2011 - Posted by Advertising Department
[The following is a paid advertisement.]
Critics of SB 678 suggest the closure of hundreds of coal plants is a non-issue. But is it?
At an ICC hearing in Chicago yesterday on this supposedly “nonexistent problem,” the CEO of MISO, one of Illinois’ two power grids, said, “Environmental regulations pose a serious threat to the deliverability of reliable low-cost energy.” John Bear, CEO MISO.
Industry analysts expect Illinois to lose up to HALF of its coal plants, which currently provide 45% of Illinois electricity. 239 coal plants (40 GIGAWATTS) have already announced they will close because of the new EPA rules.
While closing old plants may be good for the environment, the cost of doing nothing in response to these closures is high. A recent Chicago Tribune story found:
“Consumers could see their electricity bills jump an estimated 40 to 60 percent in the next few years.”
According to CUB, consumers ARE ALREADY GOING TO PAY between “$107 and $178 a year” more beginning in June, 2014 because of a recent energy auction.
The problem is real and Illinois legislators have a choice.
The Comprehensive Energy Efficiency and Investment Act is supported by a diverse coalition of consumer, environment, labor and business groups because it will both cut demand and increase supply to help offset these closures. It will also create at least 16,000 direct and indirect jobs, according to a University of Illinois study.
Likelihood of voting for or against a Tea Party-affiliated candidate fell fairly predictably along party lines: 72.1 percent of Republicans said they would be more likely to vote for a Tea Party candidate, while 89.7 percent of Democrats said they would be less likely to do so.
More interesting, however, was the response of Independent voters: 30 percent said they would be more likely to vote for a Tea Party-affiliated candidate, while 57.5% of Independents said they would be less likely to cast a Tea Party vote.
Pro-Tea Party and anti-Tea Party voters view the political world quite differently. Only 11.6 percent of those who said they would be more likely to vote for a Tea Party candidate approved or strongly approved of the job President Obama is doing, while 87.8 percent disapproved.
By contrast, 80.3% of the anti-Tea Party voters approved of the job the president is doing and only 18.5 percent disapproved.
Over a majority, 51.4 percent, said they were much more likely to vote for a political candidate who is willing to compromise, and another 28.2 percent said they were somewhat more likely. Those who said they were much less likely to vote for such a candidate constituted only 5.3 percent of the sample and those who chose somewhat less likely were only 4.9 percent of the total.
“It is interesting to note that a total of only 10 percent of Illinois voters regard the willingness to compromise to be a negative quality in their candidates, while almost 80 percent understand that the democratic process cannot function without compromise,” Jackson added.
The poll also posed a related question regarding who was to blame for the lack of civility, Republicans or Democrats. Almost four in ten (37.2 percent) blamed the Republicans most, while about two in ten (18.2 percent) blamed Democrats. Another 35.6 percent blamed both parties equally and 3.5 percent blamed neither party. There were 5.5 percent who said they did not know which party to blame.
However, the pro-Tea Party voters blamed the Democrats over the Republicans by a margin of 46.7 percent to 7.0 percent. The anti-Tea Party respondents blamed the Republicans over the Democrats by a margin of 67.2 percent to 3.6 percent.
Even Tea Party backers said they’d like to see candidates willing to compromise. A total of 71.5 percent of the pro-Tea Party respondents said they were much more or somewhat more likely to vote for a candidate who is willing to compromise, leaving 16.3 percent who were somewhat less or much less likely to vote for such a candidate. The anti-Tea Party group produced 85.9 percent who were much more or somewhat more likely to vote for a candidate willing to compromise, compared to only 8.8 percent who were less likely to vote for a compromise-oriented candidate.
* The tea partiers may be losing support because one of their national icons is kinda on the goofy side. Don’t watch if your office has super-strict rules on bad words, but Congressman Joe Walsh held his usual “Cup of Joe” constituent event Sunday at Gurnee’s UNO Bar & Grill and then totally went off on some constituents…
“I need more coffee,” he said. Joe, take their advice and drink decaf from now on.
I do these cup of joe’s every wkend, I show up at a coffee shop or restaurant anywhere in district and anyone can come meet with me and talk to me about anything. They are fun, engaging sessions, I often get people who disagree w me on issues at these events and the conversation can be very spirited.
I am very passionate at these events as well as at my town halls. This was no different except I was working on an empty stomach and had a quicker fuse than normal.
The woman I had the heated exchange with was great and she appreciated how open and unusual these events are. I apologized to her for getting a bit to passionate and she smiled and didn’t mind at all.
Regarding the substance rich of what I was trying to say - I’m no pal of the big banks and I wouldn’t have voted to bail any of them out. If they’ve abused their charters they need to be prosecuted fully. But they didn’t get us into this mess - goverment policy which has dictated for years that everyone should own a home got us here. The banks only followed the rules government set. And further government meddling will only exasperate the problem.
* By the way, Walsh says that the Family Research Council candidate support statement I linked to the other day was outdated. The PAC isn’t backing a candidate as of yet, he insisted.
*** UPDATE *** Why the chairman of the Gaming Board would feel a need to express his views on policy issues like slots at tracks and school funding is beyond me, and he doesn’t offer up any other specific criticisms, so we don’t know exactly what so displeases him, but Aaron Jaffe went off on the new gaming bill today…
The state’s top gambling regulator today said a revised gambling package being considered by lawmakers is “a pile of junk” that does little to address concerns outlined by Gov. Pat Quinn.
Illinois Gaming Board Chairman Aaron Jaffe said the latest proposal making its way through the Capitol would place unrealistic time limits for regulators to vet applicants and “passes out money like popcorn” to various gambling interests.
“These guys never learn,” Jaffe told the Tribune in a phone interview. “It’s basically the same bill, worse in some places, a little better in others, but it’s still a pile of junk. No one really takes into consideration any criticism.”
Jaffe said he doesn’t understand why the bill still contains slot machines for horse racing tracks when Quinn has expressed his opposition, and argued the measure would undermine education because of what he calls a “regressive” tax structure that would allow more successful casinos to pay less.
The director of the Gaming Board was asked to testify at a Senate committee hearing on the new gaming bill today. He said the Gaming Board doesn’t take positions on legislation.
[ *** End Of Update *** ]
* If, as expected, Gov. Pat Quinn prevents Mayor Emanuel from getting a casino, there’s gonna be trouble with a capital “T”…
Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel said he believes the state is close to passing a bill that could put a casino in the city. […]
Emanuel said he’s had multiple conversations with Governor Pat Quinn about the revised bill says the plan is a good compromise.
“I think it reflects what I call an honest compromise to finally move forward and close up a point of discussion for 25 years and achieve a win for the people of the city of Chicago and the taxpayers,” Emanuel said Tuesday.
I’d like to have been a fly on the wall during those “multiple conversations” between the two.
We are disappointed that the bill does not include a ban on campaign donations from gaming interests and, like Quinn, we’d like to see a change in the legislation that authorizes video poker in taverns and restaurants.
Municipalities should have to vote to opt into video poker in their communities, rather the current requirement that they have to vote to opt out.
Rep. Lou Lang, the bill’s sponsor, called the new gaming bill a “good faith effort to comply with many of concerns” of the original bill.
We agree. Now it’s Gov. Quinn’s turn to compromise.
SB 1849 does not include a controversial provision that called for the Gaming Board to issue temporary licenses within 60 days of application to bars and restaurants seeking video gaming. The proposal was meant to spur the board to implement video gaming, which was approved as part of the funding for the state’s capital construction plan. So far, no licenses have been issued and no revenue from video gambling has come in.
Lang said some lawmakers were uncomfortable with issuing the temporary licenses. His new bill calls for the board to begin implementing video poker before any new casinos can be licensed and before horse tracks can get a license for a permanent location for slots. However, they would be able to operate out of a temporary facility, such as a tent. Lang said he wanted to ensure that the board did not “skip over” video poker to begin work on a gaming expansion. “That could be one machine, it could be 10,000 machines, but they’ve got to get it up and running.”
State Rep. Lou Lang, D-Skokie, told a legislative panel Tuesday morning that his new plan is the best chance now for Illinois to expand gambling and tap into the billions of dollars in revenue the new casinos would generate.
“If we don’t make it happen this week — because of getting into a new session, because of the primary election, because of all sort of things — it is clear to me that we won’t have a gaming (plan) to vote on until next April or May,” Lang said.
* Anybody up for a Lou Lang caption contest?…
Keep it clean, people. As always, try to elevate yourselves. Thanks.
*** UPDATE 1 *** Greg Hinz says Terry Duffy was OK with a delay earlier. And Hinz believes a November 28th special session may very be called to deal with the tax issues…
Aides to Mr. Madigan today are saying it will “take some time” to put together a bill that can fly — likely into next week, and quite possibly until after Thanksgiving.
Mr. Duffy Tuesday suggested his exchange couldn’t wait. But earlier, he told my colleague Lynne Marek that working this out in a special legislative session would be okay.
*** UPDATE 2 *** This Crain’s story is from Sept. 28th…
Mr. Duffy said the Chicago-based company, which operates the biggest futures market in the country, aims to reach an agreement on a corporate tax revision with Illinois officials before the Legislature’s October veto session, or for consideration during a special session this year. […]
Mr. Duffy said he doesn’t want to set a deadline for reaching an agreement with Illinois officials because he doesn’t want to put pressure on them. But he thinks it isn’t unfair to expect an agreement to be reached within a year of starting negotiations, which began in January. [Emphasis added,]
So, at the end of September, he was OK with waiting until January. Now, all of a sudden, he has to have a decision by Thursday.
[ *** End Of Updates *** ]
* If you watched the House Revenue Committee hearing yesterday afternoon, you saw an obviously tense but polite exchange between CME Group Executive Chairman Terry Duffy and Chairman John Bradley…
CME Executive Chairman Terrence Duffy said his hands are tied by “fiduciary duty” to shareholders, who want to know why the big trading company pays tens of millions of dollars a year more in Illinois taxes than it would in another state.
Legislative leaders had told him they would deal with this matter in this week’s General Assembly veto session, and Mr. Duffy said he intends to hold them to that promise.
Asked by a lawmaker if he could give them “a few more days,” Mr. Duffy replied: “I have shareholders that are very concerned about this issue. I have a fiduciary responsibility. . . .I will do what I need to do, in the best interests of the CME Group.”
Mr. Duffy gave a similar response when House Revenue Committee Chairman John Bradley, D-Marion, asked about an extension until a date specific — say, Nov. 29.
“With all due respect, I cannot put the CME Group (there) and limit their options,” Mr. Duffy said. “That decision would have to made by the (CME) board, not by me. . . .I am not going to commit the company to anything other than what I have.”
I wish I had video of that debate, but I don’t. Sorry.
Duffy explained that he couldn’t limit the options of CME’s board of directors, which is considering leaving Illinois after 163 years as the exchange’s home base.
“I will do what I need to do in the best interests of the shareholders of CME Group,” said Duffy, who intends to remain at the state capital in Springfield the rest of this week.
The committee did not take action Tuesday night, but Bradley indicated the panel will work through the issue “as quickly and as thoughtfully as we can.”
“We’ve got to get this right, because there’s too much at stake,” Bradley also said.
“To expect one company to pay 6 percent of the aggregate tax liability of all companies … and think that’s acceptable, that’s not acceptable,” Duffy told the House Revenue and Finance Committee.
“We’re not threatening anybody,” Duffy continued, disclosing his firm paid $108 million in taxes to Illinois in 2010. “We like Chicago. We love Illinois. We want to remain a big part of it.”
“We understand the need for appropriate review by the legislature and we are willing to work with them on this matter,” said Sears spokesman Chris Braithwaite. “As a retailer, our fourth quarter is the most important time of the year and we hope this can be resolved as soon as possible so we continue our focus on the upcoming selling season.”
Sears is asking for an extension of its current tax deal, as well as job-creation credits from the state.
Rep. David Harris, an Arlington Heights Republican, said that the complex deal might not move as quickly as the kind of Internet stock trade CME deals with every day.
“It just doesn’t move quite as fast in the legislature, and I ask you to understand that,” Harris said.
The bill that started out as a vehicle for providing tax relief for financial exchanges has evolved into a broad, potentially costly tax-break bill. It not only aims to keep CME Group and Sears Holdings Corp. from moving operations out of state, but also includes a range of breaks for other businesses and individuals.
House Majority Leader Barbara Flynn Currie, D-Chicago, said she introduced the bill on behalf of Gov. Pat Quinn.
Not exactly a ringing endorsement, although she told me she is working to pass it.
* CME, by the way, has released a statement about the impact it has on the local economy…
CME Group jobs impact alone (not including other exchanges, clients or support industry):
3.37 employment multiplier
2,060 CME Illinois employees produces an additional 4,880 jobs
Trading Industry in Chicago:
50,000 Trading employees in Chicago metro
85,000 Additional jobs created to support those trading jobs
135,000 Total Illinois jobs reliant on the trading industry – estimated $330 million in state income taxes
CME Group is a hub of job creation and innovation
Notional value of CME Group 2010 trades was $994 Trillion
Approx $25.5 billion of CME Collateral (margin) is held at Chicago Banks
550 new trading companies added to Illinois in last 5 years
CME has customers in 150 countries with access to its electronic trading platform
Other Losses to Illinois if CME Group were to relocate:
CME Group and its related foundations and charitable programs donated $22 million to Illinois nonprofits in the past 5 years
Other taxes, eg. utility and sales and use tax
Increased unemployment
* And if you’re wondering what this decoupling aspect to the tax package is about, here’a primer…
The federal government created a new economic incentive involving depreciation on major purchases. Basically, it let companies write off the full depreciation at once instead of doing it over several years. Because Illinois law is tied to the federal tax code, Illinois suddenly found itself offering the same tax break.
By decoupling from federal law, Illinois would no longer automatically offer that tax break. Illinois businesses would pay what they’ve always paid and do it on the same old schedule.
That would prevent a $570 million hit to state revenues this year and a $350 million hit next year.
* I have yet to hear anyone say that the pension reform bill is definitely moving forward to a floor vote this week. And even if it does, and even it it passes, barring a miracle, there’s little to no chance of Senate passage by Thursday.
An Illinois House committee has approved a measure to change pension costs and benefits for state employees.
The bill heads to the full House where its fate is uncertain. It would create three different “tiers” of pension benefits and costs. One of those is a 401k-style “defined contribution” plan.
Supporters say the state needs to change its pension plans because it can’t afford them. Unions strongly disagree with the changes being proposed.
* But a provision designed to calm the nerves of current employees will also end up costing the state a lot more cash than the original bill. Read carefully…
Unlike the version of the bill considered in the spring, Tier 1 employee pension contributions would not be re-calculated every three years to determine the actual cost of Tier 1 pensions as Tier 1 members die or migrate to other tiers. Unions had protested that the payments would become so cumbersome as to eventually make Tier 1 unaffordable.
The current version of SB512 allows a review of employee contribution rates in 2015 and allows them to be raised by 2 percentage points. After that, no further increases would be permitted.
But that would mean employees in Tier 1 would receive a larger contribution from the state than employees in other tiers, noted Rep. Kevin McCarthy, D-Orland Park, the pension committee chairman. It will also reduce savings – estimated by supporters to be in the the tens of billions of dollars – supporters believe the state will achieve under the bill.
Biss asked an actuary from the Civic Committee of the Commercial Club of Chicago, a group of the city’s top business leaders pushing the legislation, whether she had calculated how much it would cost the state if no Tier 1 members migrated to another tier of benefits. She had not, leading Biss to wonder why the legislation had to be acted upon this week.
The proposal still saves the state money, just not as much.
In a recognition of the bill’s political sensitivity, state Rep. Karen May (D-Highland Park) voted for the measure during the committee roll call, but changed her vote to “no” after realizing the bill had enough votes to pass.
We’ve heard the overheated rhetoric from both sides of this issue. We’re not out to demonize teachers, firefighters or any other public employees. They have a right to be concerned and they deserve a fair deal. But all public employees need to realize what the numbers show. At some point, there will be no money to distribute to retirees under the current structure.
They also need to look at their situation in the context of the American work force as a whole. Many private sector employees have seen defined-benefit pensions end. Many employers no longer match employee contributions to their 401(k) plans. In Illinois, these are the workers who saw their income tax increase by two-thirds.
And the lawmakers who have the power to do something about this situation?
They need to stop quaking with fear of lost union endorsements and take responsibility for correcting years of irresponsibility.
In other action, the [House Personnel & Pensions Committee] approved a bill that would rescind a 2007 law that allowed lobbyists Steven Preckwinkle and David Piccioli of the Illinois Federation of Teachers to get in line for sizable state teacher pensions. They merely had to work a single day as substitute teachers. They had no prior teaching experience, prompting sponsoring Rep. Jack Franks, D-Marengo, to call their arrangement “obscene.”
“The bill is so blatantly unconstitutional on its face that Mr. Preckwinkle and Mr. Piccioli think it merits no other comment,” said David Ormsby, the lobbyists’ spokesman.
In the Senate, lawmakers introduced a separate proposal that would boot the two lobbyists from the teachers pension system but also sought to stop a series of pension abuses by leaders from a variety of Chicago-area labor unions.
It’s interesting that so many legislators say they can’t support the big pension reform bill because of its doubtful constitutional validity, but can support clearly unconstitutional legislation that does almost nothing except attract media attention.
I’m not going to defend what Preckwinkle and Piccioli did, but I’m also not gonna continue hanging them in the public square.
* Another long day ahead, campers. Committees start early today, so look alive.
Live House audio/video is here. Live Senate audio/video is here. BlackBerry users click here. iPad and iPhone users remember to use the “two-finger” scrolling method…
