* The last time I posted something about a bill to lay out requirements for recycling supermarket plastic bags, we got some comments like this one…
Just recycle the darn plastic bags people. It’s not hard. Take a big bag. Stick all the little plastic bags in it. When full. take to store for recycling. I do it all the time. I still get the convenience of plastic bags but know that I’m minimizing their footprint by recycling them.
How many of these plastic bags are there? No one really knows. Estimates on the web range from 4 billion new bags a month to 7 trillion a year. Many countries — about a fourth of the world’s population — either ban or heavily tax them out of existence. The bags are either illegal or rare in Belgium, Italy and Ireland.
Because the bags are light, they float and blow easily and travel long distances. It takes only about a dozen bags carelessly discarded, stuck in the trees, to pretty much ruin the appearance of a park. And because the bags have a shelf life of as much as 1,000 years, they will be with us a long time. The Nina, Pinta and Santa Maria have long since decayed. The sword of Charlemagne is a relic. The bag from a foodmart is eternal.
State Rep. Michael Tryon, R-Crystal Lake, has a bill in the hopper requiring plastic manufacturers to set up a network of recycling sites. Most, but not all, grocery stores already have them. Chicago already has a recycling program.
But most people could not be bothered. Tryon noted that only two percent of the bags are recycled now. By contrast, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency estimates that 72 percent of all newsprint and 85 percent of all cardboard is recycled.
State Rep. Monique Davis’ Democratic friends in the Illinois House Tuesday spared her from a tax bill of at least $444,500.
By a 60-54 vote, with Davis voting present, the House entered into the legal dispute between the longtime South Side lawmaker and the Chicago Board of Education over her refusal to pay back rent and leaseholder taxes on her district office, which is in a school-owned building.
The measure would bar taxation on any property owned by a state or local government leased to another state or local government. It makes no mention of Davis, but the bill would essentially undercut a school system lawsuit against Davis.
That provision was tucked in a broader bill that would exempt a Wheeling office used for “disaster preparedness” and owned by the Mutual Aid Box Alarm System from property taxation.
Davis, who occupies a rent-free Chicago Board of Education building as her district office, was sued in 2009 by the school system in a bid to collect seven years of back rent of $75,000 and uncollected leasehold taxes and penalties totaling $444,500.
A local Democratic contender for a new Illinois House of Representatives seat is facing a domestic battery charge.
Natalie Manley, a Joliet accountant and candidate in the 98th District race, was arrested Tuesday by Joliet police at her home in the 3100 block of Ingalls Avenue.
Police said the arrest stemmed from a dispute Manley had with her 21-year-old daughter. The younger woman reportedly told police she had lost her cell phone and was unable to let her mother know she would be home late.
When the 21-year-old did return to the apartment she shares with Manley at around 2 a.m. Tuesday, police said she was attacked by her mother, who “punched, kicked, knocked her to the ground, struck her in the face [and] hit her with a set of keys.”
* And now onto something a little funny. First, the setup…
With the primaries more than a month in the past, two more Democrats will be on the November ballot.
The leaders of the county Democratic committees nominated Wanda Rohl for the 16th Congressional District and Thomas Boken Jr. for the 90th House District at their meeting Tuesday evening.
Rohl, a hospice worker from outside of Ottawa, will face U.S. Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Manteno, in the redrawn 14-county district, which includes Lee, Ogle, Bureau and the western half of DeKalb counties.
Kinzinger defeated fellow incumbent U.S. Rep. Don Manzullo, R-Egan, in the March Republican primary.
A hospice worker sounds like a fairly decent candidate. Good for her. She has no chance, but participation in our democracy is a great thing.
OK… in case you missed it…. this is an adult conversation!
Today on my hour long commute to class I was flipping through radio stations when I heard ” Do women think about other men while they are having sex?”
OK…the radio guy said “sure they do” while his female co hosts where like “oh hell no…we have to concentrate to get to the big O”.. I laughed and thought oh wouldnt that be nice… I miss the big O, but in true reality as a 39 year old, college student who works, and has three kids… thinking about getting to the big O even if I could, is ususally not what is on my mind…
Things I think about during sex…
God I am tired!
Can the kids here us?
This bed makes way to much noise.
OMG the dog just jumped up on the bed…
Did I remember to lock the door.
I have to get up in 4 hours.
What time is it?
OK the cats are fighting in the basement.
I can’t concentrate… I need to turn the TV off.
…blah, blah, blah……
Oh YEAH….. I Love Him.
Sex is great, but really I am at the point I have to schedule an appointment to have sex otherwise I have other things are on my mind.
So now that you have thought about it the question is… What’s on your mind during sex?
Now, there’s nothing wrong with a healthy discussion about sex. But, sheesh, man, at least consider deleting this kind of stuff before you jump into a congressional race.
The Illinois Municipal League’s Legislative Director, Joe McCoy, says cities across Illinois are facing similar problems of growing unfunded liabilities. He says it’s a disturbing trend that’s grown in recent years, as stock values tumbled. McCoy says there’s not much municipalities can do about it. They don’t decide what retirement benefits should be offered to employees. The state does.
“The biggest structural problem we have with the system is that the state gets to dictate what the pension benefits are and they don’t have to put in a single dime toward funding the financial obligations that they’ve imposed on local taxpayers,” McCoy said. ”So they don’t have any real incentive to restrain themselves from enhancing benefits. Because they reap all the political benefits of increasing the pension levels, without having to pay the bill.”
* The Question: Should state government be prohibited from setting pension benefits for local government employees? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please.
Wednesday, May 9, 2012 - Posted by Advertising Department
[The following is a paid advertisement.]
Illinois residents want to cut the deficit and create jobs without tax increases or budget cuts. A recent independent analysis shows that a modest expansion of gaming in Illinois would create 20,500 jobs and $200 million in desperately needed new annual revenue.
That’s why Illinois labor leaders are united in support for the compromise legislation contained in Senate Bill 1849:
“With our unemployment numbers still hovering around 9 percent, the state can’t afford to take a pass on this vital piece of legislation. We’ve got men and women ready to go to work today, and SB 1849 would finally give them the opportunity to earn their living.” Tom Balanoff, President, SEIU Local 1
“More people at work means more tax revenues coming in to help balance our city, county and state budgets.” Dave Whitmore, Business Manager, Ironworkers Local 4
“More than 50,000 jobs are at stake! Not only would SB 1849 create 20,000 new jobs, it would save more than 30,000 agri-business jobs that effect nearly every single one of Illinois’s 102 counties!”Former Rep. Bill Black, Chairman, the Illinois Revenue and Jobs Allliance.
* Rep. Elaine Nekritz’s bill to repeal Illinois’ supremely goofy law making it a felony with a maximum 15 years in prison to record audio of an on-duty police officer could get a House floor vote today. Her bill came up short last time after opposition from the coppers. This federal appellate court ought to boost her bill’s chances…
In a blow to Illinois’ sweeping eavesdropping law, a federal appeals court on Tuesday blocked its enforcement in cases where someone is recording a police officer at work.
It was a victory for activists who had feared that using smartphones or video cameras to record police responding to demonstrations during this month’s NATO summit in Chicago could land protesters and bloggers behind bars for years. It’s also the most serious legal challenge to the measure — one of the strictest in the nation — and adds momentum to efforts by some state lawmakers to overhaul the legislation, whose constitutionality has been questioned. […]
“The Illinois eavesdropping statute restricts far more speech than necessary to protect legitimate privacy interests,” the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit said in its opinion. “As applied to the facts alleged here, it likely violates the First Amendment’s free speech and free-press guarantees.”
The ruling stemmed from a 2010 lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union seeking to block Alvarez from prosecuting ACLU staff for recording police officers performing their duties in public places, one of the group’s long-standing monitoring missions.
Chicago has already decreed that it won’t arrest people for violating the law during the NATO summit. It’s an unfair, unworkable, unconstitutional statute and the strong opposition by law enforcement to this proposal has no basis in reality.
* It’s tough to pass any legislation that’s opposed by law enforcement agencies, including prosecutors. Videotaping interrogations was going to break the process, according to law enforcement, and state legislation very nearly didn’t pass. But have you heard of any real problems since that requirement became law nine years ago?
The constitutional amendment would have changed the role of victims in the legal process. But uncertainty over how that role would affect a prosecutor’s ability to go after criminals helped sink the bill just days before Sunday’s deadline to put it on the ballot.
Victims’ rights are often a bipartisan rallying cry at the Statehouse. When the amendment first passed the House in February, only two Democrats voted against it. Changes were made in the Senate, but 55 senators still voted for it.
The amendment, HJRCA29, seemed on track to clear the House again until Wednesday, when it met a buzz saw of opposition from both defense attorneys and prosecutors. The lobbying effort by the Illinois State Bar, Illinois state’s attorneys and Illinois public defenders associations forced lawmakers in the House Judiciary Committee on Criminal Law to reconsider their position.
“This, in my mind, has thrown a very interesting dynamic into something that early on was very easy to get behind and strongly support,” said Rep. Jim Sacia, R-Pecatonica. “This opposition has greatly convoluted that.”
(a) Crime victims, as defined by law, shall have the following rights as provided by law:
(1) The right to be treated with fairness and respect for their dignity and privacy throughout the criminal justice process.
(2) The right to notification of court proceedings.
(3) The right to communicate with the prosecution.
(4) The right to make a statement to the court at sentencing.
(5) The right to information about the conviction, sentence, imprisonment, and release of the accused.
(6) The right to timely disposition of the case following the arrest of the accused.
(7) The right to be reasonably protected from the accused throughout the criminal justice process.
(8) The right to be present at the trial and all other court proceedings on the same basis as the accused, unless the victim is to testify and the court determines that the victim’s testimony would be materially affected if the victim hears other testimony at the trial.
(9) The right to have present at all court proceedings, subject to the rules of evidence, an advocate or other support person of the victim’s choice.
(10) The right to restitution.
(b) The General Assembly may provide by law for the enforcement of this Section.
(c) The General Assembly may provide for an assessment against convicted defendants to pay for crime victims’ rights.
(d) Nothing in this Section or in any law enacted under this Section shall be construed as creating a basis for vacating a conviction or a ground for appellate relief in any criminal case.
Victims already have some pretty broad rights here. But there is no actual enforcement mechanism if those constitutionally guaranteed rights are denied. And because the Constitution bars appellate relief, this really can’t be resolved through simple legislation.
The deadline for putting constitutional amendments on the ballot has passed. So the opposition won big. It would be nice, though, if the next time this comes around that there was a real effort by prosecutors to help come up with a solution. “Trust us, we know what’s best for them,” isn’t it.
* The 1990’s welfare reform initiative required single moms to work, so child care service was provided to help those mothers, who typically don’t make much money, cope. But when a huge hole developed in the state’s budget for child care services, a shock wave was felt throughout the state. Gov. Pat Quinn now says, however, that he may have found some extra cash between some couch cushions…
“We’ve located about $73 million in the budget that will not be spent on the original purpose this year, so we’re going to reallocate that money for the child care subsidy to make sure that working moms and dads have the subsidy they need in order to go to work and make sure their kids are well taken care of,” Quinn said Tuesday.
Officials with Quinn’s budget office said the money will come from a fund originally set aside to pay Medicare premiums.
The proposal is under review by Democratic leaders. A spokeswoman for Senate President John Cullerton of Chicago said he is also open to alternatives, but warned that “the solution will demand a consensus.”
A spokeswoman for House Republican Leader Tom Cross said he wants to work to solve the child care funding shortfall and is examining the proposal.
* While welcome news, the governor’s continued rebuff to those wanting to generate new revenues through gaming expansion is just plain silly…
Quinn warned lawmakers against getting distracted by the gambling push, which happens almost every year near the end of the spring session, saying they need to keep their “eye on the prize.”
“We have very, very high priorities in restructuring Medicaid and reforming our pension system and getting a good budget. So, we don’t want to get distracted here,” Quinn said following an appearance at Soldier Field for the opening of the Special Olympics spring games. “I think we’ve got to keep our eye on the prize, and the prize is complete restructuring and reform of two programs that need fundamental overhaul.”
Quinn’s comments came in response to a rally by labor leaders in Chicago urging support for a gambling bill that would bring casinos to Chicago and four other locations across the state. Union groups say the proposal would create thousands of much-needed jobs in Illinois. The gambling expansion was passed by lawmakers last year but stalled after Quinn threatened to veto the bill because it also would allow slot machines at horse racing tracks.
Since then, pro-gambling lawmakers have been trying to work out a deal that would appease horse track owners. Prospects for a gambling expansion likely would improve after the November election, when lame-duck legislators might be more willing to vote for it.
The state needs that money now, governor. Are you really willing to kill off social service functions because you don’t want people to gamble at the track? Dude, no offense, but people are already gambling at the track.
When Rep. Raymond Poe, R-Springfield, stated his belief that such a move would contribute to unemployment by keeping older workers on the job longer (thus keeping young people out of jobs), and that 67 is too old for teachers to work, Emanuel was politely dismissive. A 62-year-old or younger “retiree” is not really a retiree, he said.
“The assumption you have is that people at 62 are retiring, and I don’t think that’s true. Or at 50. In fact, they’re going on with many years of work left in them, and they do work, which is a reflection of … a change that’s going on in society,” Emanuel said. “Actually they go on and continue many years of very healthy and productive work.” […]
“It’s good for the system, it’s good for the employees and it’s honest with everybody that’s expected to pay into it. That in fact they’re not retiring,” Emanuel said. “And at the Social Security level, people who retire at 62 get a lower benefit than people at 67. That’s some of the changes that are going on.”
Some 39 percent of workers now plan to retire after age 65, up from 30 percent before the recession in 2007 and just 15 percent in 1995. Age 65 remains a popular retirement age, with just over a quarter (27 percent) of workers planning to retire then, a proportion that has remained fairly consistent over the past decade. Older workers generally expect to retire at a more advanced age than younger employees. Those age 40 and older are planning to retire at an average age of 68, compared to age 65 among people under 40.
The proportion of people who think they will be able to retire early has declined significantly over the past five years. Some 13 percent of workers are now aiming to retire in their early 60s, down from 18 percent in 2007. And the proportion of people who think they will retire in their late 50s has declined from 11 percent in 2007 to 7 percent in 2012. Just 6 percent of workers say they will retire before age 55, which is the same proportion of people who thought that in 2007.
Thoughts?
* Related…
* Editorial: ‘The moment of truth’: The mayor talked of the “moment of truth.” Quinn talks of a “rendezvous with reality.” We’d settle for a vote.
* WSJ Editorial: How to Do Pension Reform: Illinois Democrats are spearheading pension reform, and get this—they’re not merely tinkering around the edges.
* D87 union: ‘We want seat at pension reform table’: President of the Bloomington Education Association Rich Baldwin said teachers can’t stomach everything in the package. He said he doesn’t know of any pension reform package the state’s unions have offered as a counter. “What we’re asking is we’d like to be at the table to discuss some of these things,” Baldwin said. “I’ll personally say some of what the governor is floating I could live with, but I can’t live with the entire package without the obligation that the state is going to commit to paying their part of the plan.”
* You may have already seen this video of Sen. Mark Kirk’s stroke rehab progress, but it’s a heckuva thing, so here it is…
* Coverage…
* Emotional Kirk thanks Illinois’ people for “patience” in first video: Kirk, 52, who has been in the care of the Rehabilitation Institute for the last several months, says he is anxious to get back to work but gives no timetable for doing so. He thanks the people of Illinois for “the patience they have given me to recover from a big stroke.”
* In video, Sen. Mark Kirk says he’s anxious to get back to work: In the video, the Highland Park Republican speaks confidently — and occasionally haltingly — into the camera and talks about being anxious to walk the 45 steps up to the Capitol to begin working again…. Video shows him walking determinedly, if not easily, with a walker and on a treadmill with the help of a harness and a physical therapist. Some shots show him using parallel bars to support himself with his right hand. Kirk says he hopes “to climb the 45 steps that my staff counted from the parking lot to the Senate front door to fight for the people of Illinois.”
* Sen. Kirk releases video showing his rehabilitation after stroke
* “My stroke” - Sen. Mark Kirk writes about his illness and rehabilitation
* I’m coming a little late to this, but the Republican county chairmen in the 13th Congressional District has winnowed the possible ballot replacements for retiring US Rep. Tim Johnson to four…
* Jerry Clarke, who previously served as Johnson’s chief of staff;
* Rodney Davis of Taylorville, an aide to U.S. Rep. John Shimkus, R-Collinsville
* Former Miss America Erika Harold, an attorney and Urbana native;
* Kathy Wassink of Macoupin County, who owns a business that serves students with special needs.
The four candidates eliminated by the 14 Republican county chairmen in the district after a meeting Saturday in Springfield include former Illinois Agriculture Director Becky Doyle of rural Gillespie; Sam Spradlin, a Springfield truck driver; Frank Metzger, a retired ironworker, of Glen Carbon; and Michael Firsching of Moro, a veterinarian.
“He grew up in the district, knows the challenges facing the people of the district and has the same values as the citizens of the 13th Congressional District,” said state Sen. Bill Brady, R-Bloomington, who is endorsing Clarke. “He has served our nation’s Armed Forces with distinction for more than a quarter century, including three tours of duty as an Army commander and pilot in Iraq.”
Davis also has some heavy hitters on his side. His boss, Shimkus, is backing him.
U.S. Reps. Aaron Schock of Peoria and Bobby Schilling of Colona are said to be in his corner. That trio could pull some heavy duty weight with the county chairmen.
At the same time, a number of the county chairmen are new. They may resent the prospect of top-down pressure from top party officials.
And then there is Harold, the 2003 beauty queen originally from Champaign. The chairmen will have to decide whether voters in the downstate district will support a Harvard educated lawyer from Chicago. They’ll also have to consider whether they’ll have the resources to fend off the national Democrats, who may want to stop Harold in her tracks because of her potential to move up in the ranks if she wins.
McLean County Republican Chairman John Parrott said the chairs asked each of the eight candidates various questions, including if he or she will be able to raise enough money for the race towards November.
“By the time we make the decision on this, on the 19th of May, it’s going to take anywhere from $8,000 to $10,000 a day to win this race,” Parrott said.
* In other campaign-related news, the Tribune discovered that a judicial candidate was arrested for allegedly stealing yard signs…
Carl Boyd won the Democratic nomination in March for a subcircuit judge post in Cook County and is a shoo-in for the November election because he is running unopposed. But first he must deal with a trial late this month — his own. He faces a misdemeanor charge of allegedly stealing the campaign signs of a primary rival in the middle of the night.
Boyd, a veteran Chicago attorney, was arrested by Chicago police about 2 a.m. the day before the March 20 primary while allegedly in the possession of a dozen signs promoting the campaign of primary rival Chester Slaughter. […]
“I can tell you that the police officer stated that this would make for a great story,” he told the Tribune. “But he certainly did not see me pick up one sign. That much is true.”
The cop may not have seen Boyd pick up a sign, but the police report claims that 12 campaign signs were found in Boyd’s car.
* This may be no joking matter…
Dane Ciolino, a law professor at Loyola University in New Orleans who specializes in legal and judicial ethics, said that even though Boyd was charged with a misdemeanor offense, he could face “significant” problems with legal disciplinary officials. Boyd could be suspended from practicing law or if he wins election as judge, he could be removed from office, Ciolino said.
* The SJ-R posted a photo of a ticket for last night’s big Speaker Madigan fundraiser last night. As the ticket notes, this was the 32nd annual fundraiser on the lake…
As you can see from the $150 ticket, Madigan has had this fundraiser for the last three decades, and it will be packed with lobbyists, lawmakers and other statehouse denizens. It’s no wonder they have to bus people from Lincoln Land Community College to the Island Bay Yacht Club.
* As subscribers were told earlier this morning, Mayor Rahm Emanuel will visit Springfield today and testify to a House committee…
Mayor Rahm Emanuel on Tuesday makes his first physical trip to Springfield since he took office in Chicago last year.
Emanuel’s office confirmed he will testify at 10 a.m. before the Illinois House of Representatives Committee on Personnel and Pensions.
This isn’t the mayor’s first dealing with Springfield. He’s been known to work the phones (i.e. for Chicago speed cameras) and has a team in place, but this time, he’s traveling there himself. […]
Though the meeting is the only thing on the mayor’s Tuesday public schedule, sources say he has an open-ended return to Chicago.
* The hearing begins at 10 o’clock. Emanuel will probably testify soon after it starts. Follow live Tweets here. You can find the General Assembly’s live audio/video feed for hearing room 114 here. The folks at BlueRoomStream.com have also provided us with a live embed…
Tuesday, May 8, 2012 - Posted by Advertising Department
[The following is a paid advertisement.]
Illinois consumers face a projected cost increase of $400 million every year for the next 30 years from the proposed Taylorville Energy Center coal plant, so it’s no wonder over 300 organizations that operate and do business in Illinois have signed up on the STOP Coalition’s website to publicly oppose this project.
And just last week, 25 health, farm and environmental organizations signed a letter to Illinois lawmakers calling this project “unnecessary, unreasonably expensive, and risky for Illinois”.
The Taylorville Energy Center would have a devastating impact on Illinois families and businesses, who would pay up to nine times today’s market price for electricity to subsidize this project. That’s a lot of hard-earned money up in smoke.
And that’s why such a broad and diverse group of voices across Illinois – consumer advocates, environmental organizations, local government agencies, faith communities, and businesses large and small – are lining up to oppose this project.
You can take action today by urging your State Representative to “Vote NO” on any legislation that supports the Taylorville Energy Center.
You can also voice your opposition to the Taylorville Energy Center by signing on at STOP Coalition’s website or by “Liking” the STOP Coalition Facebook page.
* The House Speaker tried to blame the media yesterday for pointing out some very real and substantive differences between himself and the Senate President about how to proceed with pension reform. As I told you yesterday, Speaker Michael Madigan introduced legislation that would change the MWRD’s pension plan in a deal worked out with most of the unions involved. It was seen as a model for reforming the state’s pension funds, but Senate President John Cullerton tacked on an amendment in the Senate which would’ve “nudged” employees into a new pension system by cutting their benefits in the current system. Cullerton eventually backed off that proposal and allowed Madigan’s version to stand. WUIS picks it up from there…
Several news reports highlighted the differences. But Madigan was diplomatic.
MADIGAN: “I don’t know that Cullerton took that much of a different approach.”
The speaker says he’s keeping an open mind.
MADIGAN: “I wouldn’t get uptight about the opinions unless of course you want to run a story that there’s a big conflict. If you want to do that, well you’re going to do what you’re going to do.”
Despite what Madigan says, the legal differences between the approaches are central to the debate over what Illinois can and cannot do as leaders look to cut the cost of retiree benefits.
That reporter is exactly right. These may look like technical differences, but they are quite different approaches to pension reform. And if Madigan does his usual thing and insists on his way or the highway, he could divide the two chambers.
Cullerton’s idea looks far more constitutional to many Statehouse eyes. But the reality is that neither may pass judicial muster.
* House Speaker Michael Madigan basically told reporters yesterday that if his proposal to all but eliminate the requirement that the state pay retiree health insurance premiums doesn’t pass, then major budget woes will follow…
Illinois’ House speaker isn’t sure lawmakers will finish their business ahead of the scheduled adjournment at the end of the month.
House Speaker Michael Madigan, D-Chicago, says a lot of work still must be done, particularly on Medicaid. He says much of the budget hinges on the governor’s proposal to cut $2.7 billion out of the program, and Madigan says lawmakers must hit that target.
“If the governor’s requested reductions in Medicaid don’t meet the mark… we need to go back and rearrange all the other numbers,” he says.
Lawmakers will also spend the next three weeks trying to fix what some call the state’s unsustainable pension systems, but that has been difficult as many proposals have preemptively been called unconstitutional.
Madigan says he’s watching his proposal, S.B. 1313, work its way through the legislature. The proposal would eliminate free health care premiums for 78,000 state government retirees, which is how many retirees gave 20 years of service or more. Other government employees who gave less than 20 years, whose premium is calculated based on years of service, would also be affected.
“There’s much to be done in terms of the budget making. Significant reductions that must be done… and if we’re not able to pass S.B. 1313, then I would ask, what are we going to be able to do?” he says. “This will be a reduction budget.”
Translation: Without this cut, other budget items will have to be slashed.
* Related…
* Quinn linking Illinois budget cuts to job growth
* Greg Hinz gives us the story on what could be a very big disagreement between House Speaker Michael Madigan on one side and Senate President John Cullerton and Gov. Pat Quinn on the other over pension reform…
As I reported in my blog on ChicagoBusiness.com last week, the bill at issue dealt only with the Water Reclamation District of Metropolitan Chicago. It would have enacted an agreement between the district and all but one of its unions that called on workers to contribute an additional 3 percent of their salaries to the pension fund and the district to double its contribution from property taxes.
The bill passed the House unanimously—a rarity when it comes to pensions. Since workers still would be getting a defined benefit, albeit one that would cost more, everyone seemed pretty happy.
But when the bill moved to the Senate, Mr. Cullerton claimed sponsorship and moved to amend it. Specifically, he wanted to add a clause allowing workers to stay in the current system without paying that extra 3 percent if they froze their pensions at current levels.
Mr. Cullerton obviously hoped that would be a model in negotiations on restructuring the state’s overall pension systems. The Chicago Democrat, like Gov. Pat Quinn, is a strong believer that pension changes cannot be imposed by fiat but only as part of a negotiated process in which workers have some choice.
Anyhow, Team Cullerton seemed to think it had the green light. They filled me in and re-tweeted an item I did on the president’s “big pension move.” And the chief sponsor of the House bill, Rep. Elaine Nekritz, D-Northbrook, told me she was OK with the change.
Then Mr. Cullerton abruptly yanked his own amendment. His folks make it pretty clear that was done at the request of Mr. Madigan. Indeed, Madigan spokesman Steve Brown effectively confirmed that, telling me, “I think the speaker felt the bill was fine as it passed the House.”
What’s not clear as of this writing is whether Mr. Madigan pulled out the rug unfairly at the last second, or whether Mr. Cullerton got a little ahead of things. Different sources are giving me different answers.
But the two Chicago Democrats see the water reclamation district plan in different ways — Madigan believes changes can be imposed after negotiating with unions, while Cullerton thinks all employees have to be offered a choice.
Cullerton wants to let workers decide between an altered pension, which would cost the employee more but be better funded, and the current system, which would cost workers the same but could have other consequences, such as not having future raises counted when pensions are calculated.
The concept is called “consideration” by Cullerton and the Senate Democrats’ legal counsel, Eric Madiar.
The choice would apply to all public employees, not just those in unions. The state constitution makes public employee pensions a contractual right regardless of whether an employee participates in collective bargaining.
Cullerton and Madiar contend that simply negotiating with unions won’t be enough for any legislation to comply with the state constitution’s language. Late last month, after proposing a plan that follows the Cullerton-Madiar structure, Gov. Pat Quinn said he also believes that simply negotiating with the unions won’t pass constitutional muster.
In the case of the water reclamation district, only about 800 of the 2,000 employees are unionized.
I think Cullerton probably has the right idea here. How can unions negotiate pension changes for systems with lots of people who aren’t union members?
Call it “Blagojevich Lite” or whatever you want, but it became pretty clear last week that state Rep. Derrick Smith’s attorneys are planning the same sort of mockery of the system that Rod Blagojevich’s legal team did during those dark days after the former governor’s arrest.
“While I have been troubled to experience the shenanigans being played by the FBI, to lean on people around me and to get them to say bad things about me, I will not cower,” Smith (D-Chicago) told reporters after he pleaded not guilty to federal bribery charges.
Never mind the fact that nowhere in the arrest report or federal indictment is there any reference to anybody saying “bad things” about him. Smith is accused of taking a $7,000 bribe to help get a state grant for a day care operator, a business that was a creation of federal agents.
Smith also claimed that the people of his district “elected” him on March 20 because “they believed in me.” Yeah. Right. OK.
The voters gave him the Democratic nomination on March 20 despite the fact that he had been charged because party leaders warned them that Smith was up against a white, conservative Republican activist who was posing as a black Democrat. Many of those same Democratic leaders are now calling for Smith’s resignation.
Smith’s pledge to never “cower” in the face of the federal prosecution was right out of Blagojevich’s defiant playbook. Blagojevich loudly declared his complete innocence, vowed to fight to the end, said he had been persecuted by the feds and once even challenged the U.S. attorney to a manliness contest.
Right up until he checked himself into federal prison to serve a 14-year term, Blagojevich said the feds had the wrong guy. Smith, by the way, is now looking at 10 years in a federal penitentiary.
But it was one of Smith’s attorneys, Victor Henderson, who really brought the former governor to mind with his remarks.
Henderson told reporters that Smith had been entrapped, but the lawyer’s evidence of this entrapment was an allegedly phony government website and a fictitious day care center operator. That’s hardly proof of entrapment. Actually, it’s standard stuff for a federal sting operation.
And doesn’t claiming that Smith was entrapped into accepting a $7,000 bribe mean Smith and his lawyers are all but admitting that he took the money? And if he did take the cash, isn’t that enough right there to expel him from office?
The House doesn’t have to consider whether or not Smith is guilty under state or federal criminal statutes. This is not about criminality. It’s about politics.
Under its rules, the House merely has to establish “disorderly behavior” by the offending member. That isn’t a very high bar. Theoretically, the House could expel a member for spitting on the sidewalk if two-thirds of the members so voted.
Henderson did make a good point about the FBI failing to inform a judge of its informant’s extensive criminal record. And he gave the strongest indication yet that he planned to disrupt and distract the process from beginning to end when he quoted anti-Nazi Lutheran Pastor Martin Niemoller’s immortal poem about moral cowardice during the Holocaust.
“First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out because I was not a socialist. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out because I am not a Jew. Then they came for me, and there was no one left to speak to, for me.”
“Today it’s Derrick Smith,” Henderson told reporters, according to Chicago Public Radio. “Who is it tomorrow?”
Needless to say, invoking the Holocaust to defend a client accused of taking a cash bribe is more than a bit much.
But now that the House Special Investigating Committee has allowed Smith and his legal team more than enough time to get their feet underneath them by continually postponing the inevitable, we can probably expect a lot more crud such as this.
Henderson told Illinois Issues magazine that his client plans to testify at future House hearings. The next one is scheduled for May 10.
If Henderson was telling the truth about Smith testifying, we can all expect an embarrassing circus.
* Henderson is also raising expectations of incredible new evidence that will clear his client’s name. Sound familiar? It should…
Henderson accused the FBI of targeting his client because allegedly he would not supply information about Jesse White and other prominent Illinois public officials.
Henderson declined to provide details about what information the FBI allegedly sought. Druker strongly refuted Henderson’s charges, responding “the focus here is Derrick Smith and not Jesse White. These are just desperate charges.”
“There are going to be some developments that will begin to unfold in the next few days,” Henderson insisted. Smith has pled not guilty and appeared in court on April 30.
At one time, Blagojevich also hinted that the feds were after information about Barack Obama. That was just another of his lies.
A group of Democratic ward committeemen met behind closed doors Friday in search of a strategy to clean up the Derrick Smith mess. […]
An hour or so later, Secretary of State Jesse White, whose support of Smith was key to his earlier selection, emerged to say the group had developed a plan to either replace or defeat the accused lawmaker.
White said a delegation would be sent to speak directly with Smith to ask him to give up the Democratic nomination he won in the March primary. Smith’s victory came only after party leaders stepped in to keep the seat from falling into the hands of his opponent, the former executive director of the Cook County Republican Party.
Ald. Jason Ervin (28th) and Rep. Karen Yarbrough (D-Maywood) will be the official emissaries, White said. […]
If the diplomatic efforts fail, White said Democratic leaders resolved to field a third-party candidate to defeat Smith in November.
Northstar Lottery Group — which took charge of daily operations July 1, a few days after the Illinois auditor general blasted the selection process — promised to boost revenue by more than $100 million.
While the dollars are indeed up, they are expected to fall $55 million short of their projections, renewing criticism from those who had opposed the deal.
* The company promised $825 million in total revenues. It’s on track to bring in $770 million. That may actually be a $100 million increase, as you’ll find if you read way down deep into the article explains…
Northstar said several factors led to the lowered forecast, chief among them the fact that the lottery’s revenue for the previous fiscal year was about $668 million, not the $712 million the state anticipated.
But, as the article notes, the Lottery claims it transfered $690 million last fiscal year to the state budget. Nobody could explain the discrepancy.
Northstar has to meet a specific goal or it’ll be fined. According to the Trib, if the company hits the $770 million projection, it would owe nearly $11 million in penalties…
In a move aimed at avoiding possible penalties, Northstar wants the state to lower the goals.
Officials with Northstar and the Illinois Lottery refused to discuss what new revenue targets the company is seeking through arbitration.
What we really need here are the real numbers. The Lottery needs to start sharing. Pronto.
* Rare is the day when the Chicago Tribune editorial page blasts Republican state legislators on the budget, but today is that day…
Patricia Bellock, Michael Frerichs, Raymond Poe, you are part of the problem.
Suzi Schmidt, Dave Syverson,you are not far behind.
They are all members of the Illinois House or Senate. They sit on the Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability. Last week, they reviewed Gov.Pat Quinn’splan to close government facilities around the state.
Illinois has no money. It has to stop spending wherever it can. The governor has made some tough choices.
The commission voted on closing six major facilities the governor wants to close. The commission went 0 for 6.
House Republicans Bellock and Poe and Senate Democrat Frerichs didn’t vote to close one major facility.
Senate Republicans Schmidt and Syverson voted to close only one.
Look, there are plenty of really good reasons not to close some of those facilities. I even agree with some of them, disagree with others. There are decent arguments against closing all of them. For instance, this is from a Treasurer Dan Rutherford op-ed in the very same Tribune…
I would prefer a long-range strategic plan before the state closes any of its mental health or correctional facilities
Legislating ain’t always easy, especially in times like these. But there are folks who talk a good game about cutting the budget and then won’t follow through.
* The Trib’s closer…
It’s time for Republicans to get in the game. You want more cuts in Medicaid than the governor has proposed? Put ‘em on the table. You want to spare local schools from pension costs — where’s your better idea? You don’t want to close a costly prison? Then name another state operation you will shut down tomorrow.
Sen. Kirk Dillard, R-Hinsdale, has argued for years that much of Illinois’ Medicaid problem could be solved by rooting out waste and abuse. He says experts believe 10 percent of Medicaid money is spent improperly, which would amount to nearly $1.5 billion in Illinois.
Unfortunately, there’s little evidence to support that claim.
Dillard attributes the figure to the New York Times. He doesn’t specify, but he may be referring to a series of stories in 2005 on fraud in the New York state Medicaid program. The 10 percent figure popped up for two different kinds of fraud and abuse. One was an estimate of the problem in New York’s badly run Medicaid program, and the other was an estimate of losses in all health care nationwide, not just Medicaid.
Neither figure says anything about fraud and abuse in the average state Medicaid program.
A 2010 report by the National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association said a conservative estimate of fraud in the nation’s total health spending _ not Medicaid alone _ would be 3 percent, although it also noted the FBI had put the rate at somewhere between 3 percent and 10 percent. A spokesman for the group recently put national fraud loss at “tens of billions of dollars” but wouldn’t be any more specific.
The Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services says it’s not aware of any 10 percent fraud estimate and doesn’t consider it to be accurate. The department’s fraud recovery each year amounts to tens of millions of dollars _ nothing close to the hundreds of millions that Dillard envisions.
