Three Illinois Guardsmen killed in Afghanistan
Thursday, Mar 19, 2009 - Posted by Rich Miller
* I’ve neglected to do anything regarding this terribly tragic news, so here it is now…
Three Illinois Army National Guard soldiers were killed by a roadside bomb in eastern Afghanistan on Sunday, the Department of Military Affairs has confirmed.
Sgt. Christopher Abeyta, 23; Spc. Robert Weinger, 24 and Spc. Norman Cain III, 22, were all assigned to Company D, 1st Battalion, 178th Infantry based in Woodstock. An active-duty Airman from Tucson, Ariz., was also killed in the incident
Specialist Cain died at the scene of the incident in Kot; Abeyta and Weinger were transported to Jalalabad, Afghanistan, where they later died.
* Learn more…
* Mt. Morris soldier killed by bomb in Afghanistan
* Gates pays respects to fallen Guardsmen at Dover
* Round Lake Beach Guardsman one of three to die
* Woodstock-based soldiers killed in Afghanistan
* Fallen Freeport Soldier
* 3 Illinois soldiers die in Afghanistan - National Guardsmen killed in explosion on Afghan road
Comments Off
|
|
Comments Off
|
|
Enter your password to view comments
|
Question of the day
Thursday, Mar 19, 2009 - Posted by Rich Miller
* What grade would you give to the governor’s budget address and his actual proposed budget?
Please rate both, and explain both grades. Thanks.
38 Comments
|
Unions and the pension fight
Thursday, Mar 19, 2009 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Labor unions representing state government workers and teachers are obviously not happy. Yesterday’s announcement by the IFT that it would withhold endorsements from anyone voting for the “pension cuts” was a hugely controversial post here. We have more today…
The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees said Quinn is trying to balance the state’s budget problems on the backs of rank-and-file workers. The combination of Quinn initiatives would cost an employee earning $35,000 a year more than $2,500, AFSCME said.
* AFSCME says the pension changes are subject to negotiations…
Quinn chief of staff Jerry Stermer indicated some of the changes could go through even despite union opposition. […]
State employee unions insist the Quinn administration needs their approval for the changes. Stermer said the administration wants to negotiate with the unions, but administration officials believe the pension changes can go ahead as long as lawmakers approve them.
The same question is under examination for health insurance, Stermer said.
Good point…
“If I were AFSCME, I sure wouldn’t open up the contract for negotiations,” said James Nowlan, a senior fellow for the Institute for Government and Public Affairs at the University of Illinois. “What do they have to gain by doing that? This is a nonstarter.”
* A week ago today, Gov. Quinn spoke to the Illinois Education Association and was greeted with a loud standing ovation…
“I think you will see from the budget address next week that I’m willing to stick my neck out and take big chances on behalf of the kids of Illinois, their parents, their teachers …” he said.
Ken Swanson, the IEA state president, responded…
“If you’re willing to stick your neck out and take the lead, we’ll have your back,” he promised.
What a difference a week makes. From a press release entitled: Statement by Illinois Education Association President Ken Swanson on Gov. Quinn’s Proposed Budget…
“Instead of making certain the state meets its obligations to the state pension systems, the governor is asking that the scheduled funding request will be reduced by two-thirds, exacerbating the underfunding of the Teachers Retirement System and the other state systems.
“Instead of offering a plan to fix the state’s broken school funding system, Gov. Quinn allows the current system to stand, even though children in every part of the state are being denied the opportunity for a high quality education due to inadequate funding.
“Instead of directing that the federal stimulus funds be used as President Obama intended, to preserve jobs and programs in public education, Gov. Quinn would use these one-time funds to balance the state budget.
“Instead of supporting efforts to make sure the best and brightest continue to choose education as a career, Gov. Quinn is proposing retirement disincentives that surely will drive some highly qualified young people away from a career in education.
“The governor’s proposal is unacceptable to the 133,000 members of the Illinois Education Association.
Skimming all but about $200 million of the $2 billion in federal education stimulus money is the most underreported aspect of this budget, by far.
* The IFT blasted the governor’s plan to skip billions in state pension payments…
“When the people of Illinois removed Gov. Blagojevich from office, they expected to bid farewell to his budget gimmicks,” IFT president Ed Geppert Jr. said.
Oof.
* The Sun-Times was also critical of the pension skim…
Switching to a two-tiered system would reduce future pension costs but it wouldn’t lower the $73 billion already owed.
For that reason, we were disappointed to see that Quinn wants to make only a $1.5 billion pension payment for next year. Under a 1995 law, the state is supposed to pay $4 billion. That’s unfair to state employees who have faithfully paid their share. The state must either pay that bill or revise the payment schedule. A more reasonable schedule might lower the annual payment to a flat rate — it increases each year — and extend it over a longer period of time.
Quinn, you’ll recall, promised a budget free of gimmicks. That didn’t happen.
But the Tribune was happy to ignore the pension skim, at least for now…
State government’s greatest problem going forward is its huge unfunded pension burden. Quinn’s proposals to raise the retirement age for new hires, and to ask current employees to pay an additional 2 percentage points toward retirement, are a good start on pension reform. But he’s going to skip some payments into the pension system, and we need to know what burden that puts on the state in the near future. Grade, including extra points for having the courage to go there: A-.
59 Comments
|
|
Enter your password to view comments
|
Tax hike react
Thursday, Mar 19, 2009 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Individual taxpayers aren’t the only ones upset with Gov. Quinn’s tax hike plan. Business is furious…
“If this plan were passed, Illinois would have the 5th highest corporate income tax rate in the nation, though we would be close to tied for second. Illinois at 9.7% would be surpassed only by Iowa at 12%, Minnesota at 9.8%, Pennsylvania at 9.99%, and DC at 9.975%. (All three of these states have graduated taxes, but the rates shown are the highest rate for that state.)
“This, in combination with lost incentives, would be one more reason for employers to look elsewhere to avoid Illinois’ long‐standing anti‐business climate.”
* Speaker Madigan was noncommittal…
“I would say that before we move forward on any tax increases, Illinoisans want to know how we’re going to clean up Illinois government,” said influential Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan, a Chicago Democrat, in an interview with a downstate public television station.
* Senate President Cullerton was more direct…
“With an $11.5 billion deficit, it’s very likely there will have to be a tax increase,” said Senate President John Cullerton, a Chicago Democrat.
* The other Democratic statewide officials were, predictably, less than enthusiastic…
“If taxes are needed to raise more revenue, I’m deeply worried about hurting the middle class, who are struggling,” said [Attorney General Lisa Madigan], the daughter of the House speaker. “And so all steps should be taken to make sure that their taxes aren’t increased.”
Treasurer Alexi Giannoulias, who is exploring a bid for the U.S. Senate next year, said that if the public is asked to “make more sacrifices” in paying higher taxes, “property-tax relief is essential.” An aide to Comptroller Dan Hynes, who also is looking at moving up the political ladder, called the budget plan “a starting point.”
Secretary of State Jesse White, who is looking at running for a fourth term, noted Quinn’s call for higher fees on motorists and said, “Within my [driver’s licensing] facilities, I have a disclaimer to remind the people that I didn’t do it.”
* The Sun-Times makes a forceful case…
This page has already expressed support for Quinn’s deeply unpopular income tax increase.
No one wants it, but Illinois needs it desperately. For years, state revenue has not matched expenses — and not simply because of reckless spending.
* Zorn smacks down Rod Blagojevich’s recent criticisms…
But for many years, Blagojevich had been running up a tab at Café Illinois without having the money to pay for it—using budget gimmicks and deferred payments to disguise that the state was spending and creating financial obligations lots faster than money was coming in.
“He was maxing us out on our credit cards,” said Laurence Msall, president of the Civic Federation, a tax-policy watchdog organization. “He never fixed the structural problems that are compounding this current economic crisis.”
In a WGN-AM 720 interview Wednesday, Roosevelt University political scientist Paul Green compared Blagojevich to an arsonist who sets a house ablaze then complains from the safety of the sidewalk that the firefighters are wasting water.
* And Kristen McQueary blasts the GOP…
Opposing tax and fee increases is the cornerstone of their 2010 campaign strategy.
This stock quote House Republicans sent to the media on behalf of state Rep. Renee Kosel (R-New Lenox) captures exactly what I mean:
“While it is true that Illinois is facing one of the largest budget deficits, turning to taxpayers to get us out of this mess is not the answer. I was hoping that Governor Quinn would have the courage to abort the tax and spend policy of the Blagojevich administration. We need some accountability for the state programs already in existence. We need to re-evaluate, to go back to the table and ask ourselves which state programs are worth funding and which could be eliminated,” Kosel said.
If all we need to do is “go back to the table,” why haven’t legislators done that at some point during the last year as the budget crisis mounted? Instead, they wait for the governor to offer solutions to the state’s problems, and then they excoriate him?
* Democratic Sen. Michael Frerichs does a good job of summing up the no-won situation that Democrats find themselves in here…
“Give me a scenario this year where a Democrat in a tough district wouldn’t be sweating it out,” Frerichs said. “Would I be sweating making billions in budget cuts? Would I be sweating if we were voting again on a gross receipts tax? Would I be sweating if we were talking about expanded gambling at a time when gambling revenues are weak? To those concerned about Democrats in tough districts sweating it out I say, what sort of budget would be easy for us to pass this year? Every month you see declining revenues coming into the state, you realize that this isn’t going to be easy.”
* Republican Rep. Chapin Rose gets a bit hyperbolic, but his response was not atypical…
Rep. Chapin Rose, R-Mahomet, credited Quinn with coming up with a funding source for his spending plans.
“Unlike Rod Blagojevich, who just came up with ideas to spend more money but didn’t suggest ways to pay for it, at least we’ve got a funding source on the table,” Rose said, “but after looking at the (income) tax rates and all the tax increases proposed, the average Joe isn’t going to have anything left for his family to spend after this. The Democrats continue to fail to control spending.”
21 Comments
|
A few devilish details
Thursday, Mar 19, 2009 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The Taxpayers Federation of Illinois points to something that I had also noticed this morning…
* Sweetened Tea and Coffee Drinks will be taxed as Soft Drinks
* Tax all grooming and hygiene products at the same rate (presumably the high rate)
That means the full sales tax will be expanded to those items. It’s not a huge thing, but in Chicago and Cook County where the sales tax is a hot topic, it won’t go over well.
Also, from TFI, business won’t like this…
* Decouple from the following provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
o Deferral of gain recognition from reacquisition of business debt security
o Five year carry-back of net operating losses by small businesses
* I hadn’t noticed this aspect of Gov. Quinn’s proposed “back to school” sales tax holiday for clothes and school supplies…
Pete Gill of the Illinois Retail Merchants Association said the group likes the theory, but not the specifics, of the governor’s proposal for a 10-day sales tax holiday for back-to-school purchases in August.
Gill said a preliminary analysis of the budget indicates Quinn would pay for the holiday by cutting a 1.75 percent “sales tax allowance” for merchants by more than half. Retailers are reimbursed for collecting state sales taxes.
“It hurts retailers and could potentially raise prices,” Gill said.
Retailers are gonna freak out about losing half of their sales tax allowance. In times like these, when retailers are closing in droves, that will be met with super-stiff resistance.
* And this is an interesting point to ponder…
Kim Clarke Maisch, state director of the National Federation of Independent Business in Illinois, said about 85 percent of small-business owners, including in Illinois, pay the individual rather than corporate tax rates.
* No big deal, but some won’t be happy…
Admission to the Illinois State Fair would increase by $2 per person, to $5 for adults and to $2 for children, who have been admitted free in recent years.
* The Trib picks a nit…
A new advisory board will scour the budget for line-item savings. Outsourcing food, janitorial, technology and other services more economically supplied by private employers ought to be a priority. We hoped Quinn would give privatization of these high-cost internal services a push. He can do better. Grade: D+ .
16 Comments
|
Are the proposed tax exemptions necessary?
Thursday, Mar 19, 2009 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Is tripling the state’s income tax exemption really necessary? We’ve already got a pretty darned low income tax, and it would still be somewhat low after the proposed increase. And then there’s this…
Gov. Pat Quinn’s plan to raise the personal income tax exemption to $6,000 from $2,000 per person would make Illinois’ exemption one of the most generous in the nation. Only Connecticut’s $13,000 exemption is more generous. But Connecticut does not apply its exemption to dependents. In addition, Connecticut’s exemption decreases as income increases. Illinois’ is static for all incomes. Therefore, Illinois’ $6,000 per person exemption would top Connecticut’s for a three-person household. A taxpayer does not pay tax on exempted income.
* Sen. James Meeks told Mark Brown what several other legislators were saying yesterday, or at least part of it. Not everybody says that the tax hike is too small, but the exemptions are very contentious…
“The tax increase is too small,” Meeks said. “The exemption is too great.”
Increasing the personal exemption to $6,000 from $2,000, as Quinn proposes, “has not been on anybody’s radar screen,” Meeks complained. “It has no allies.”
He’s right that nobody in the GA has ever really talked about the exemption increase. It’s just way too new to be digested quickly. More…
A partial solution, Meeks says, would be for the state to pass legislation committing itself to use the new income tax revenues for schools by the third year after it takes effect — allowing two years to clear up the deficit.
That might not be a bad compromise, especially if there was something in the law about reducing property taxes, or even sales taxes.
* Quinn’s defense of the increased exemptions and a challenge to his critics…
“It is a principal as old as the bible,” Quinn said. “Taxes should be based on ability to pay.”
Acknowledging growing opposition to his tax hike plans, Quinn warned his foes that they need to come up with better solutions to the state’s damaging shortfall.
“You must tell the people of Illinois what you will do instead,” Quinn said to cheers from lawmakers, adding later, “Saying ‘No’ is not enough unless you are willing to speak the truth and offer real alternatives.”
* The Rockford Register Star is unimpressed…
Quinn has tried to soften the blow by raising the income tax exemption to $6,000 from the current $2,000.
While that would mean a family of four making $25,000 would see a dramatic reduction in state income tax, a single person making $20,000 would see a big increase.
* Neither does the PJ Star…
Not to rain on anybody’s parade, but if 5 million Illinois citizens will come out ahead in this budget, as Quinn contends, that means another 8 million won’t. Arguably Quinn’s proposals will put less money in the pockets of most Illinois citizens in a high-anxiety job climate, which means they’ll be less likely to spend it and get the economy humming again.
We fail to see how these tax increases will convince Caterpillar to hire back the 24,000 workers it has let go in this downturn. Government may have a role where short-term job creation is concerned, but where most of us live, the private sector is the place we look for long-term, steady employment. “If you’re able-bodied and you’re breathing, we want you working in Illinois,” said Quinn. Yes, but will this budget accomplish that?
* The SJ-R likes it…
We favor a graduated income tax instead of Illinois’ flat tax; Quinn’s increased personal exemption proposal would cut taxes for families but leave single people making as little as $20,000 paying higher income taxes. A constitutional amendment allowing a truly progressive tax structure should be on next year’s agenda.
…Adding… Tom Cross…
“(Quinn’s) shifting the bulk of the burden of this tax increase to what I think is truly middle-class,” said House Minority Leader Tom Cross, R-Oswego.
* Let’s keep this focused on the exemptions, not the tax hike. We’ll talk about that subject in another post.
22 Comments
|
Not so deep thought
Thursday, Mar 19, 2009 - Posted by Rich Miller
Why is it that when you’re in a hurry to get something done, nothing seems to go right? Browsers crash, files won’t open, etc.
Oy.
Discuss amongst yourselves for a while.
* Also, Wonkish.com has a nifty Quinn tax hike calculator…
16 Comments
|
Morning Shorts
Thursday, Mar 19, 2009 - Posted by Mike Murray
* Powerful alderman threatens Art Institute subsidy over admission fee increase
Calling the Art Institute of Chicago’s impending 50 percent admission fee increase a raw deal for taxpayers, a powerful Chicago alderman has threatened to cut off the museum’s free city services.
“They are making it almost impossible for the average Chicago citizen to take his or her family to view these Chicago treasures,” said Ald. Ed Burke (14th).
Burke and Ald. Virginia Rugai (19th) introduced an ordinance that would block city fee waivers to any not-for-profit Chicago Museum that charges more than $10 for general admission.
“Once the proposed increase takes effect, the general admission to the art Institute would top the Louvre Museum in Paris, the Uffizi Gallery in Florence and the National Gallery in London,” Rugai said.
* Chicago Art Institute: Museum’s fee hike angers alderman
* Prosecutor says top DUI cops need squad-car cameras
The department has nearly fulfilled a promise to equip every beat car with a camera. Of its fleet of 2,500 vehicles, many of the 264 video-equipped vehicles are beat cars. But many other cars also make traffic stops and aren’t equipped with cameras.
The city plans to put cameras in 275 more police vehicles with $2 million in federal stimulus money.
* Chicago mayor, top cop shrug off union’s no-confidence vote
The no-confidence vote is symbolic only. Weis has about two years remaining on a three-year, $310,000-a-year contract.
* Daley Confident in Weis’ Job Performance
* CTA slow zones: More CTA trains are going slower than last year
* Chicago reacts to news of IOC revenue deal
* Chicago’s Olympic priorities: City repaves park roads first
Steele acknowledged that the Washington Park work bumped to the front of the line because of the impending visit from Olympic officials.
“We wanted to hit some of the streets near the planned Olympic venues before the IOC visit,” he said.
But the Washington Park roads merited being fixed this year because of “multiple potholes or significant deterioration,” he said.
* Community Groups Threaten Protests During IOC Visit
* Elgin mayor says proposed alcohol ban aims to curb public drunkenness
* LaHood upset by Globe Energy chief’s work ethic comments
* Chicago Sanchez trial: Closing arguments given in hiring fraud trial
* Sanchez Jurors Thinking Race
* Attorney: Al Sanchez deserves ‘civic award,’ not corruption indictment
* Bogus Chicago cops, firefighters to face stiffer penalties
Instead of a ticket with a maximum fine of $100 for impersonating a police officer, impostors now face a misdemeanor punishable by up to 6 months in jail and a fine of $1,000 to $1,500. Firefighter impersonators, who faced only a $10 fine, will be subject to the same penalties.
* DuPage weighs campaign contribution limits
The board does not have the authority to enact campaign-finance laws, so it is considering setting limits on businesses. Any company that donates more than a set amount to a county campaign would be ineligible to receive a county contract. Details, such as the dollar amount for the limit, have not been determined.
11 Comments
|
|
Comments Off
|
This just in…
Wednesday, Mar 18, 2009 - Posted by Rich Miller
* 12:31 pm - From the Illinois Federation of Teachers…
Any legislator who supports these pension cuts will automatically not receive an IFT endorsement.
117 Comments
|
Budget address
Wednesday, Mar 18, 2009 - Posted by Rich Miller
* 11:45 am - The address is about to begin. You can listen or watch here, or check out CBS 2’s broadcast here.
I’ll be doing the “pregame” show on public television. Check your local listings. I probably won’t do much blogging during the speech, so please help the latecomers or people unable to listen/watch by liveblogging in comments. Thanks.
64 Comments
|
* Progress Illinois posts this headline today…
JP Morgan Chase Expanding India Outsourcing By 25%?
…And asks….
How exactly does Bill Daley, brother of the Chicago mayor and longstanding chairman of JPMorgan’s Midwest Region, expect to make a viable run for U.S. Senate in Illinois with headlines like this surfacing?
More…
In response to this news, 42 members of Congress — including Illinois Reps. Phil Hare, Luis Gutierrez, and Bobby Rush — signed a letter yesterday to JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon expressing outrage at “the potential actions of [the] company to outsource tens of thousands of U.S. jobs.” If Daley were an announced candidate, you can be sure he’d be answering for this as well. He’d also be facing questions about why his company took $25 billion in federal bailout funds, only to use the money to buy other banks — rather than start lending.
PI has posted the full letter from the congresscritters here.
* And here’s a Sneedling that I missed several days ago…
It’s a fact: State Comptroller Dan Hynes, a former health care attorney who is an advocate of federal- and state-funded stem cell research, is planning to run for Illinois attorney general.
• • Hire ‘em: Sneed has learned Hynes has hired Sarah Rosenzweig, a top Obama fund-raiser and Illinois finance director for the Obama inaugural, to raise funds for his attorney general campaign.
• • The upshot: “The campaign is a definite go — but only if Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan runs for governor, which is pretty much a sure thing,” said a top source. “Madigan is very aware of Hynes’ intentions,” the source added.
• • The backshot: Hynes was first out of the Illinois political gates in calling for U.S. Sen. Roland Burris’ resignation.
25 Comments
|
|
Enter your password to view comments
|
Question of the day
Wednesday, Mar 18, 2009 - Posted by Rich Miller
* If you read comments, you know that I try to steer people away from proposing smallish, symbolic budget cuts. I do that because it too often distracts from the big picture: Gigantic deficits that can’t be solved with a few little cuts.
Today, though, I’m gonna give you free rein.
* The Question: What smallish state budget items would you eliminate if you were king/queen for a day? List as many as you want.
77 Comments
|
Sanchez: Don’t blame me, blame Daley
Wednesday, Mar 18, 2009 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The interesting thing about Al Sanchez’s testimony yesterday was that he apparently pointed the finger of blame directly at the 5th Floor…
A defiant Al Sanchez took the stand at his federal fraud trial Tuesday and angrily told a prosecutor he was too busy running snowplowing operations and working in the city’s alleys to corrupt hiring for the Streets and Sanitation Department.
Sanchez, who ran the department for Mayor Richard Daley from 1999 to 2005, said it was the mayor’s Office of Intergovernmental Affairs that really made the decisions on who got jobs. He might have made some recommendations but was focused on doing the people’s business. […]
“Is it part of Hispanic empowerment to go to IGA, submit names to IGA in order to influence the hiring process at the city?” Shah asked.
Sanchez balked repeatedly at answering. He first replied, “Wow, that’s a … either you shoot me or you stab me. Say that one more time. It’s a good one.”
Sanchez finally said, “The question itself almost makes it sound illegal.” He said he participated in giving names to the mayor’s office because he wanted “a level playing field” in city hiring.
* More…
The essence of Sanchez’s defense is that he could not have manipulated hiring in his own department, as he is accused, because all hiring decisions were controlled by the mayor’s office of intergovernmental affairs, which he referred to only by its initials, IGA.
It took cross-examination by Assistant U.S. Attorney Manish Shah to remind the jury that IGA was run by Victor Reyes, Sanchez’s close political ally from HDO. Most of IGA’s honchos have already gone to prison for their role in the hiring scheme, with the notable exception of Reyes. […]
But Sanchez did not budge from his position that he knew nothing of the system by which former Streets and San personnel director Jack Drumgould rigged the interview process in violation of the Shakman consent decree that prohibits political patronage.
He said he had only recommended people for jobs and professed ignorance that hundreds of job-seekers applied for positions in his department but never had a chance because they had no political sponsor.
“I was not in charge of hiring,” he insisted.
* The Sun-Times editorialized…
But of course, as we all know, the mayor’s patronage office wasn’t about leveling playing fields.
It was about tipping playing fields to favor those with clout.
12 Comments
|
Daley to Quinn: Give us our money
Wednesday, Mar 18, 2009 - Posted by Rich Miller
* You knew this was going to happen sooner or later. It happened sooner. Mayor Daley is turning a big thumbs down on a Gov. Quinn’s plan not to share the wealth of any state income tax hike with municipalities…
(T)he mayor slammed the door on the governor’s controversial plan–disclosed this week by the Chicago Sun-Times–to withhold the 10 percent stake municipalities would expect to see in additional revenues from an income tax increase.
For Daley, the proposal could not come at a more difficult time.
Nose diving tax revenues tied to the prolonged recession threaten to poke a $200 million hole in the mayor’s 2009 budget. That could mean another round of employee layoffs on top of the 420 job cuts that took effect Dec. 31.
“Any reduction in revenue from the state income tax to local government will only increase the pressure on local governments to raise taxes, something we must work to avoid during these tough economic times,” Daley said at a City Hall news conference.
Daley demanded that the legislature “maintain its commitment to support local government.” He said the battle over the municipal share of the Illinois income tax was “a statewide issue fought many years ago” by Democratic, Independent and Republican mayors and should not be waged again.
It’s not a “reduction” if the city isn’t getting its share of a tax increase, but whatever. You get the idea.
15 Comments
|
Big budget roundup
Wednesday, Mar 18, 2009 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Let’s get to the budget stories, shall we?
The pension fund skim is actually a lot higher than the $2.8 billion listed in this story if you include Fiscal Year 2011…
Quinn wants to hike individual and corporate income taxes by more than $3.2 billion next year, with the individual rate rising from 3 percent to 4.5 percent and the business rate climbing from 4.8 percent to 7.2 percent.
Another $2.8 billion in new cash would come from reducing pension benefits for new state employees, then using that savings to cut what the state needs to pay into the pension systems this year and next.
We weren’t given a full list of these cuts, but we’ll know more by noon or so…
State spending would be shaved by $1.3 billion. State workers — other than those who work directly with patients or in public safety — would have to take four furlough days each, estimated to save $36 million. Health insurance costs for employees and retirees would rise by $200 million.
The Illinois Historic Preservation Agency would be folded into the Department of Natural Resources. Quinn also would not reopen about a dozen shuttered state historic sites, including the Dana-Thomas House in Springfield.
More on the furloughs…
Nearly all state employees, except those working in public-safety jobs or who provide direct patient care, would have to take four furlough days, one for each quarter of the year. That would cut an estimated $36 million in costs to state government, according to Quinn’s administration.
Jerry Stermer, Quinn’s chief of staff, said university employees also wouldn’t be required to take furlough days.
* This is something that wasn’t leaked earlier…
The governor also is proposing a 10-day sales tax “holiday” that would eliminate the 5 percent state sales tax in August on back-to-school purchases.
* Most of the tax talk has centered around the “50 percent increase” figure and the “half of all taxpayers will actually see no increase or a tax cut” claim. But if you’re single, or you are married or are single with one dependent, your taxes will go up even at lower income levels…
SINGLE
• $30,000: $768 now, $972 proposed, up $204
• $45,000: $1,182 now, $1,593 proposed, up $441
• $60,900: $1,621 now, $2,251 proposed, up $630
• $75,000: $2,010 now, $2,835 proposed, up $825
• $100,000: 2,700 now, $3,870 proposed, up $1,170
MARRIED WITH NO CHILDREN or SINGLE WITH ONE CHILD
• $30,000: $708 now, $702 proposed, down $6
• $45,000: $1,122 now, $1,323 proposed, up $201
• $60,900: $1,561 now, $1,981 proposed, up $420
• $75,000: $1,950 now, $2,565 proposed, up $615
• $100,000: $2,640 now, $3,600 proposed, up $960
* Pension changes…
Maintain the “defined benefit” plan, but new employees would receive fewer benefits.
Employees would increase their contributions by 2 percentage points.
Cost-of-living adjustments would be readjusted to 50 percent of the consumer price index or 3 percent, whichever is lower.
Similar to the Social Security system, retirement age for new employees would be 67.
Employees covered by Social Security would earn 1.5 percent of their final pay per year of service. Employees not covered by Social Security would earn 2 percent.
Estimated savings by the new system: $162 billion by 2045.
…Adding… Just to be clear, these pension changes also apply to workers in the Teachers Retirement System.
* Capital plan…
Quinn is considering $20-a-year hike in license plate sticker fees, which would rise to $99 on July 1, and increasing the driver’s license fee to $20 from $10 now, according to information provided to lawmakers.
[…]
His proposal for a $26 billion construction plan dubbed “Illinois Jobs Now!” is aimed at creating 340,000 jobs over several years. Quinn’s predecessor…
Under the plan, $14 billion would be targeted for bridges and roads, $4.6 billion for mass transit, $4.2 billion for school construction and $971 million would be set aside for $971 million. One of the more contentious provisions of the construction program is that Quinn wants pay for it through increasing fees for drivers licenses and license plate fees to pay for transportation-related improvements while using 10 percent of the new income tax revenue to pay for school construction and other “economic development” projects around the state.
* Related…
* Kadner: Quinn budget to include 3rd airport land fund
* Illinois Governor’s Budget Address Today
* Illinois Governor Gives More Details on Budget
* What Quinn’s budget may cost you
* How Quinn tax plan would affect different families
* Quinn Set To Unveil Budget, Tax Hikes
* Higher taxes, fees in plan to balance Illinois budget
* Quinn To Call For 50% Income Tax Hike
* ‘Drastic cuts,’ tax increase in budget plan
* Quinn using tax breaks to soften increase
* Quinn to suburbs: Someone’s got to pay
* Share the wealth and spread the pain
* Smokers might bear brunt of Illinois budget fix
* Quinn proposes extra $1 in taxes on cigarettes to raise money
* Quinn trying to sell tax hikes, fee increases in budget address
* Analysis: Quinn making most of his opportunity
* Quinn budget to include airport land fund
* Quinn considering sales tax holiday for back-to-school shopping
* Quinn’s budget speech: Good news/bad news for preserving the past
* Tribune obtains Quinn’s state budget proposal
* Quinn wants to up driver fees to fund construction
* Will state tax hike make economy worse?
* Durkin: Lease Lottery, Avoid Tax Hike
* Radogno to gov: Tax hikes last option, not first choice
* Ill. Republicans to keep open mind on tax hike
* Daley Refuses to Weigh-in On Tax Hike
* Pension problems
* Deadbeat Illinois shouldn’t miss out on extra cash
44 Comments
|
|
Comments Off
|
Morning Shorts
Wednesday, Mar 18, 2009 - Posted by Mike Murray
* ‘That’s a good one’ — Sanchez’s success story has Chicago feel to it
* Al Sanchez trial: Ex-Streets and Sanitation boss says he was too busy to rig hiring
* Ex-Streets and San chief Sanchez cleans up image
* Sanchez’s risk of testifying might pay off
* Sanchez Attacks From Witness Stand
* Closing arguments expected in Chicago fraud trial
* Jody Weis gets no-confidence vote by rank-and-file officers
* Rank-and-file trash Chicago police superintendent
* Shooting victim is 29th Chicago student to be killed this school year
* Teen is 29th CPS student killed this school year
* Another Chicago Public Schools student slain
* Chicago schools chief Ron Huberman visits slain student’s classmates
* Test scores up in Chicago schools — charter and regular
* Anti-Olympics protest set for IOC visit
* Protests planned during I0C visit
* City finance committee to hold special 2016 Olympics meeting
* Stroger to order hiring freeze
Starting next month, jobs can’t be filled, with few exceptions
* Cook County pays $100,000 to recorder’s employee who sued for political firing
* Case may determine what taxpayers can know about officials’ pay
Whether taxpayers have a right to know how much their school superintendent, city manager, and other contracted government employees earn and what they do for the money is now up to the Illinois Supreme Court.
The court heard oral arguments Tuesday on whether Wheaton Warrenville Unit District 200 can keep its superintendent’s contract secret. Mark Stern, of Wheaton, a one-time candidate for the District 200 school board, asked for the contract in 2006.
* Quigley Heads To Washington After Primary Win
* Early voting begins today for 5th District seat
* Caterpillar to lay off 2,454 workers in 3 states
* Caterpillar laying off 815 at Aurora plant
* Caterpillar Layoffs Have Employees Questioning Their Future
* Schock Says Stimulus Hasn’t Helped CAT
* Corus bank warns of $317 million loss, possible failure
* Corus says auditors may raise doubt about bank’s future
* The fifth season: pothole
12 Comments
|
|
Comments Off
|
|
Comments Off
|
|
Comments Off
|
Layers of the airport onion
Tuesday, Mar 17, 2009 - Posted by Rich Miller
* NY Times columnist Bob Herbert has written two columns this week about the forever-stalled third Chicago-area airport project…
The U.S. is in a world-class recession, hemorrhaging jobs and spending trillions of dollars trying to extricate itself from the mess. That this ready-to-go project is still sitting on the table, still waiting for state government approval after several long years have already been wasted, is plain nuts.
As is pretty obvious from that above passage, Herbert fully supports Congressman Jesse Jackson Jr.’s private airport plan…
The airport proposal has long been the primary focus of Representative Jesse Jackson Jr., a Chicago Democrat. He has spent years mastering its complexities, lining up financing that would keep taxpayer contributions to a minimum and fending off interests that do not want the competition that a third airport would bring, or who would like to carve out a corrupt stake in the project.
And he seems to understand a big part of the resistance…
The major airlines serving Chicago are not interested in seeing low-cost competition flying in and out of a spanking new airport, especially one with enormous growth potential. And many of the big-time politicians in and around Chicago are upset at the very thought of an airport being built in which they would be unable to control the jobs and the contracts. Airports tend to be monstrous patronage mills. This one would not be.
Nobody messes with Mayor Daley’s airports. That’s the Number One rule in Chicago. And a competing airport violates that “sacred” rule.
* But in today’s column, Herbert shows that he doesn’t fully appreciate the hurdles faced by Jackson’s plan…
No one that I’ve spoken with has found fault with the plan or its financing, which relies primarily on private capital. But there has been a palpable coolness to the project by some of the major political players in Chicago and in the state capital of Springfield. They have created a long-term behind-the-scenes bottleneck for the project.
Something that almost never gets mentioned is that the proposed airport footprint is not in Jackson’s congressional district, and some of the people who live in or adjacent to that footprint, particulary in Will County, don’t think that Jackson should be dictating to them.
Granted, the Will County folks never really came up with their own plan until Jackson rolled out a doable project. Some of this Will County resistance is just a plain ol’ turf war. But they do bring up legit points, so maybe Herbert could call Will County Executive Larry Walsh and hear him out. It didn’t help Jackson’s cause that the former Illinois Senate Majority Leader, Debbie Halvorson, lived next to the proposed airport and was a major opponent of Jackson’s plan. It also didn’t help that former Senate President Emil Jones didn’t particularly care for the congressman, to say the least.
Also, for years the third airport plan was allegedly used by political insiders in get rich(er) quick schemes. They bought and sold parcels of airport-area land and made a nice buck or two. The plan was mostly a fiction - and most everyone preferred it that way - until Jackson came along with a realistic alternative. For that, he’s to be commended. He does have a decent plan. What’s been lacking is real support from the powers that be in Will County. If Jackson can pull that off, then this thing might eventually fly.
* Peter Fitzgerald used to tell me that politics was like an onion, especially in Illinois. You had to peel layer after layer until you got to the truth. In reality, every one of those layers represents part of the truth, and there are a whole lot of layers here. So when Herbert concludes his column today with this…
The goal from the beginning has been to keep the proposed airport out of the clutches of Chicago’s notorious “pay-to-play” tradition.
That is the most likely reason that this project, with its potential to unleash so many jobs, has taken so long to get off the ground.
…I’d suggest that he has one layer right, but there are several others out there.
45 Comments
|
Question of the day
Tuesday, Mar 17, 2009 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The setup…
In Chicago, blowing a stoplight might get you a letter, complete with a $100 fine, thanks to a red-light camera.
But that might not be the end of your photo-enforcement woes, because aldermen Monday began talking about using the city’s ever-growing legion of red-light cameras to check for vehicle liability insurance.
The city could net nearly $10 million a year in fines just by citing uninsured vehicles that also get photo ticketed for a red-light violation, said Ald. Ed Burke (14th), who brought the idea to the City Council Traffic Committee.
Citing more vehicles—including those driven safely but uninsured—could net the city more than $100 million a year, added Rowland Day, executive vice president of InsureNet, a Michigan-based company that provides instant insurance verification.
* The Question: Should the red-light camera law be expanded to nail people who don’t have insurance? Explain fully, please. Thanks.
85 Comments
|
I’m a reform agnostic
Tuesday, Mar 17, 2009 - Posted by Rich Miller
* I know we talked about this yesterday, but after reading this quote I thought the subject merited more discussion…
“The system we have is obviously not working,” [Cindi Canary of the Illinois Campaign for Political Reform] said. “How many more indictments, wire taps, grand juries and arrests must the voters be expected to endure before we are willing to try something new?”
Earlier in the day, she and other good-government advocates announced a new push to build public support for capping campaign donations.
Campaign contribution caps are not “new.” They’ve been used in DC for years and years. Yet, congressmen, lobbyists and others are still going to prison.
Simple solutions are usually neither. I’m not necessarily against campaign caps, but how much will this really clean up our system? Does anyone really believe that Rod Blagojevich would’ve avoided arrest if we had campaign caps in Illinois?
* Then again, four former US Attorneys have signed on to the idea…
We urge the state legislature—and the governor—to enact the pending legislation modeled after federal law that puts specific and reasonable limits on political contributions by individuals, corporations and unions.
Enactment of the proposed legislation will be a significant and much needed first step to ending the corruption that has for too long been part of our state’s history.
* On the other hand…
Laura Renz, research director for the Virginia-based Center for Competitive Politics, called on lawmakers to exercise caution as they consider changes to the campaign finance system.
A system with contribution limits generally hampers challengers who are taking on political incumbents, she said.
Incumbents have greater name recognition, making it easier for them to raise funds, but challengers often rely more heavily on large donations from fewer contributors, she said.
“Thus, by insulating incumbents from challenge, contribution limits can actually make it harder for voters to become aware of and root out corrupt politicians,” she said.
More…
Ann Lousin, who helped write the 1970 state Constitution and who teaches law at John Marshall Law School in Chicago, spells out some of the opposition to campaign finance limits for individuals, businesses and political groups. “If I can figure out a way around it in five minutes, you shouldn’t put it into the statute,” she said. “You go back to sunshine, sunshine, sunshine. Sunshine is the best disinfectant.”
She said individuals could disguise their financial support through friends or relatives, while state contractors could hide their donations by funneling money though subcontractors, which aren’t part of the public record. “All you’re doing is putting it underground,” she said.
* When somebody can show me a reform that actually works and has a real track record of success in cleaning up a notoriously bad system, then I’ll be for it. Until then, I’ll remain an agnostic.
Also, would the good government groups pushing this plan agree to cap their own donations? Good for the goose…
39 Comments
|
A strange Dem and the angst-ridden Repubs
Tuesday, Mar 17, 2009 - Posted by Rich Miller
* I got this press release via e-mail yesterday and filed it under “Maybe I’ll get back to this later”…
Scott Lee Cohen, local businessman and entrepreneur, opened a campaign account this week with a hefty deposit exceeding over $230,000. Scott is running for Lieutenant Governor in the 2010 election and will take over President Obama’s former field office in downtown Chicago. Scott is hoping that volunteers who are already familiar with the location will continue their commitment to service and volunteer on his behalf.
Scott has always been dedicated to serving his community. After suggestions from many friends, community residents, and members of his citizen group, Rod Must Resign, Scott decided to run for office. Scott will draw on his business and real estate experience to provide solutions to the troubled housing market and create economic opportunity in the state. “The people of Illinois need an honest leader who can run our state government on sound business principles. It’s time to bring the government back to the people,” Scott said.
But Mark Brown got a call from the candidate and wrote about him today…
Chicago pawnbroker Scott Lee Cohen has launched a campaign to become Illinois’ next lieutenant governor.
His chances are so slim that I told him he’d be better off donating his money to charity.
Even his own campaign consultant says he tried to talk him out of making the race, but the best he could do was persuade him not to run for governor
I was glad I didn’t do anything about the release, and then came this nugget…
Part of the reason Cohen said he sought me out to write about his candidacy is that he wanted to make a pre-emptive strike about some potentially embarrassing matters before they came up in the campaign.
That got my attention, I must admit, although I advised Cohen it hardly seemed necessary as his candidacy was so unlikely to take hold.
But he insisted on telling me about his 2005 arrest in a domestic battery case involving a girlfriend with whom he was living while his divorce was pending. The charges were dropped when the woman did not appear in court, he said, and he denied he did anything wrong in the first place.
Sheesh.
* And Steve Huntley looks at Republican angst…
Given the Rod Blagojevich scandal, 2010 should shape up as a year of opportunity for Illinois’ Republican Party. But GOP insiders, moneymen, heavy hitters and consultants view the lineup of possible gubernatorial candidates as lackluster and have tried, without success so far, to recruit new blood.
Feelers were put out to Illinois Supreme Court Justice and former Chicago Bears kicker Bob Thomas. “I’m happy where I’m at,” he says in declaring he’s not interested. Bush administration HUD Secretary Steve Preston was definitely interested but found out that federal service couldn’t get him around Illinois residency requirements for elective office. Bruce Rauner, the dynamic chairman of a Chicago private equity fund, decided against a run for family reasons.
Preston was dreaming and so was Rauner. More…
North Shore Rep. Mark Kirk is much more inclined toward taking a shot at the U.S. Senate than looking to Springfield. Northwest suburban Rep. Peter Roskam has landed a coveted spot on the important House Ways and Means Committee and has a promising future in Congress. There’s even been talk about U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald. He won’t say whether anyone has sounded him out, but he has made it clear he’s not interested in any political race.
The pressure has been heavy on Kirk to reevaluate, but it’s not likely that he will. Fitz did not come to Chicago to become a politician. He came to Chicago to lock up politicians. More…
State Sen. Dan Duffy of Barrington, a Legislative newcomer, impresses many in the party. He acknowledges hearing suggestions he run, but no one in the party leadership has approached him. “The party is now evaluating a lot of people and that’s a good thing,” he says. “If party leaders said, ‘You’re that person,’ I’d have to have a serious conversation with my family and find out if this is the right time for me. But we’re not there yet.” A jump from newly minted legislator to governor in just two years time would be quite a challenge.
What has party insiders looking around is the realization the crop of Republicans announced or considering the race is made up of mostly the same old faces.
Yep. And they have a right to be worried. Go read the whole thing.
41 Comments
|
Tax hike and budget roundup
Tuesday, Mar 17, 2009 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The Sun-Times has more budget details today…
Under the proposal, which Quinn is expected to lay out in his Wednesday budget address, the annual $78 registration fee for state license plate stickers will rise $20. The governor intends to raise cigarette taxes up to $1 over two years, which would double the existing 98-cent-a-pack state tax. Twenty-six states have higher cigarette taxes.
Quinn also is looking at increasing the state’s 3 percent income tax to as much as 4.5 percent. A legislative preview of his funding plans indicated Monday that Quinn is considering a new income tax rate of between 3.5 percent and 4.5 percent.
That 3.5 percent rate emerged after public outcry over the prospect of the tax increase. However, it is expected the governor will still push for a rate toward the higher end of the range identified in the legislative budget “blueprint” obtained Monday by the Chicago Sun-Times.
And in an area likely to generate heated opposition from cities, Quinn wants to withhold the 10 percent stake municipalities would expect to see in additional revenues from an income-tax increase. […]
Quinn also is expected to propose increasing the corporate income tax from 4.8 percent to 5.9 percent, saving $100 million by ending corporate tax incentives, dipping into special-purpose funds for $200 million and withdrawing $150 million from the state’s road fund.
* My syndicated newspaper column takes a look at the naysayers…
Republican state Sen. Bill Brady kicked off his new gubernatorial campaign the other day by claiming that Illinois’ horrific budget deficit can be “managed.” But a new report by the governor’s office makes that claim even less realistic than it already was.
As you already know, Democratic Comptroller Dan Hynes has estimated the state’s budget deficit could reach $9 billion next fiscal year, not including aid from the federal stimulus package. We can toss those numbers out the window now, but this is all Brady had to go on when he announced his campaign, so let’s look at it anyway.
Brady told WGN-AM (720) the day before his official campaign kickoff that the budget deficit was about $4 billion to $5 billion “on an annual basis.” That’s pretty much exactly what Comptroller Hynes projected. Hynes included $4 billion or so in unpaid bills from this fiscal year in his $9 billion deficit projection for next fiscal year, which begins July 1.
But Brady insisted the budget deficit could be managed. “The first thing we need to do is to deal with that $4 billion to $5 billion deficit. And you can manage that. When you’ve got a $53-plus billion budget, you need to manage it,” he said.
Brady did the math and concluded the state budget broke down to $4,000 for every man, woman and child in Illinois. “If the people who are elected into office can’t balance a budget taking $4,000 from every man, woman and child, then maybe we ought to find someone who can,” Brady said.
What he didn’t say, of course, was that the $53 billion budget figure he cited was for all funds, including federal funds. The state’s operating budget - the part that Illinois government actually controls - is about $28 billion. Health care programs and education spending account for all but $3 billion of that total. So, there’s really no way to “manage” the state out of even a $4 billion deficit without big slashes in spending for schools and Medicaid recipients and providers.
Most importantly, there are about 100 days or so remaining in the current fiscal year, which ends June 30. So getting ourselves out of this fiscal year’s deficit crisis with the game almost over would require unimaginable cuts. As I’ve written elsewhere, you’d essentially have to shut the government down.
Brady also claimed Illinois could pay for a capital construction program without raising taxes, such as the motor fuel tax, a proposal made by some legislative Democrats. He’d do this by stopping all transfers from the state’s road fund, which he says is over $1 billion a year.
That’s mostly true. But reversing those road fund transfers means the state would have to either eliminate or slash programs paid for by the road fund, which includes the State Police, or blow a billion dollar hole in the rest of the state budget. The problem, in other words, would be worse.
And here’s where it gets worse.
Much worse.
The governor’s office is now estimating the combined state budget deficit to be $11.5 billion. Income and sales taxes are crashing, to the tune of more than $3 billion. Medicaid costs, employee wages and benefits, including pension costs, are skyrocketing.
In short, it’s a horror show.
But if we can’t cut our way out of this mess, we certainly can’t fully tax our way out of it, either.
Gov. Pat Quinn wants to make the income tax burden as “progressive” as possible, so as of this writing Quinn’s tax hike plan is expected to avoid taxing anyone at all under the federal poverty line. Plus, nobody making less than $57,000 a year would see any income tax hike.
So even though the governor wants to raise the income tax by 1.5 percentage points, which is a 50 percent increase, he won’t get nearly the sort of revenue that an across-the-board hike would give him. That means cuts, and some of them will be painful.
There are other innovative ways to help balance the budget that don’t involve painful cuts or tax increases. But none of those ideas gets you to $11.5 billion. Not even close.
Forget about the political rhetoric and get ready to pay more for less.
* Related…
* Gov. Pat Quinn seeks consensus in break from past: “We’re a team. We’re a family. We have almost 13 million people in our family of Illinois,” Quinn said.
* Illinois Politicians Disagree on Tax Hike Option
* Former Governors Offer Quinn Budget Advice
* House Speaker Madigan Open to Tax Hike
* Quinn wants to make best of worst-case scenario
* Quinn has to be thinking about Ogilvie
* 12 steps before a tax hike
* Tax increases will spark controversy
* State Rep. Smith backs tax hike
* Tax hike plan is excessive
* Will Quinn reopen Frank Lloyd Wright’s Dana-Thomas House and other state historic sites? We’ll know Wednesday
* State to get $8.4 million for foster care, adoption
40 Comments
|
Morning Shorts
Tuesday, Mar 17, 2009 - Posted by Mike Murray
* Zorn: Killings of students provides a grim tally
* Caterpillar institutes rolling layoffs
* Bloomington looking at many job cuts
* After Years of Shrinking, Union Ranks Edge Up
After years of decline, Illinois union ranks in 2008 grew by 97,000 workers. That’s according to a recent federal report.
* The Big Chill: Chicago’s Condo Market Is Now on Ice
* Family refuses to give up home without a fight
* Chicago Tribune names biz editor
* Railway agrees to quiet zones in suburban Chicago
U.S. Rep. Dan Lipinski helped broker an agreement with Canadian National Railway to establish quiet zones through Riverside, North Riverside and Berwyn.
A statement Monday from the Illinois Democrat’s office says Montreal-based CN will upgrade crossings so trains won’t blare their horns as they pass. It didn’t provide cost estimates.
* Chicago’s potholes: Lack of funding leaves gaping holes
* Early Voting Begins For House Seat Of Rahm Emanuel
* Quigley’s D.C. trip not a ‘victory lap’
* Durbin Defends Earmarks
* Lake Michigan shoreline: Sen. Dick Durbin, Mayor Richard Daley defend earmarks
* If she hit him, he probably deserved it
Obviously, what Eni Skoien allegedly did wasn’t very smart. Now she will need a skilled lawyer to get the protection order lifted.
That’s why violence is never a solution.
Still, in a situation like this, a few whacks might be the only way a woman can hold onto her dignity.
* Hispanics leaders: We can work with Burris
* Playing race politics as a zero-sum game
* Burris’ son got state job fairly, Quinn says
* Hiring of Sen. Roland Burris’ son: Review by Gov. Patrick Quinn’s office finds no misconduct
* Bensenville village president wins ballot fight:
* Judge says Geils can stay on ballot in Bensenville
* Candidates spending big bucks in Des Plaines mayoral race
* I competed with Sanchez to get city jobs: witness
* Chicago hiring fraud trial: Prosecutors rest their case
* Ill. Supreme Court removes Vrdolyak from attorneys list
* Vrdolyak’s name off Illinois attorneys’ roll
* Cleaning firm sues over loss of Soldier Field contract
* Art Institute pricing itself out of public domain
10 Comments
|
|
Comments Off
|
Send in the clown
Tuesday, Mar 17, 2009 - Posted by Rich Miller
* 7:08 am - Rod Blagojevich is on Don & Roma’s show right now. To listen live, if you can stomach such inanity this early in the morning, click here.
The guy still claims that he was forced out of office specifically so that the Democratic legislative leaders could raise taxes. Sheesh.
I wonder if Don & Roma will still have Blagojevich on their show after he’s put into prison.
18 Comments
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
|
Hosted by MCS |
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax |
Advertise Here |
Mobile Version |
Contact Rich Miller
|