|
Question of the day
Wednesday, Jan 17, 2007 - Posted by Rich Miller As I’ve said many, many times before, I hate national politics. And I hate the sort of ugly “discussion” - rife with inane, prepackaged talking points - that national politics provokes in the mainstream media (particularly those idiotic cable TV talking heads who are always wrong, yet still keep their high-paying gigs) and on blogs. So far, I’ve posted about the Obama thing here because he is, after all, our US Senator and I covered him for years in the Illinois Senate. Here’s the question: Do you want a daily Obamarama? Would you rather that the posts stick strictly to a local angle (my preference)? Or do you want the whole issue banished? I will say that I intend to continue this at least through the February announcement, regardless of the comments today. But I’m interested to see what your thinking is. Also, bonus question: Should I start deleting the gratuitous “Hussein” comments? We already have a thread to discuss the Obama candidacy today, so let’s keep this one strictly to the questions at hand, please. Thanks.
|
|
Obamarama - Local angle
Wednesday, Jan 17, 2007 - Posted by Rich Miller I was interviewed by Rolling Stone magazine last week about Obama’s time in the Illinois Senate, and one thing I said was that while he certainly voted like a liberal, he went out of his way to establish friendships and introduce legislation with conservatives and Republicans. From what I can tell, he’s doing the same thing in the US Senate. As a result of this, one of Obama’s biggest Illinois cheerleaders is Republican state Sen. Kirk Dillard, who is also chairman of the DuPage County GOP, the state’s most powerful Republican organization. Dillard had this to say to the Naperville Sun:
And Republican state Sen. Pam Althoff told the Daily Herald that “she’d consider voting for the Chicago Democrat.” OneMan, a blogger’s blogger, is also a Republican, but he posted an interesting piece last night talking about this phenomenon and warning national Republicans about what they faced.
Mark Brown strikes some of the same notes:
Lynn Sweet looks at the reasoning for the Springfield announcement:
…As does Bernie Schoenburg:
…And so did the AP’s Nedra Pickler:
One final thing. Yesterday in comments, I had this to say about all those people who think the Clintonistas will eat Obama alive:
I’ll reiterate that for today’s discussion. Please, come up with something new and original.
|
| « NEWER POSTS | PREVIOUS POSTS » |









