* As I told subscribers early this morning, the Senate’s grand bargain was a whole lot grander than we thought last week. It included a minimum wage hike to $11 an hour over five years, a huge gambling expansion bill and a whole lot more…
Also, Amanda Vinicky has updated her Friday story with some more deets. Click here. I don’t believe a service tax is part of this, though.
* Meanwhile, in the House…
In the House on Monday, Rep. Greg Harris, D-Chicago, filed a proposal that would give social-services programs $258 million and higher-education programs $400 million. That money would include a full semester for MAP grants for all colleges, universities and community colleges, as well as funds for adult, vocational education and GED programs, according to Harris.
The money would come from two funds — the human-service fund and the educational-assistance fund. Both are fed from income taxes and would be available to spend within the first six months of the year.
“It’s a lifeline. As you remember, all the appropriations for social services and higher education ran out on the first of January, so you have schools trying to figure out how to stay open and you have MAP grant recipients trying to figure out if they can actually go to school — or if their school will be funded for the whole year,” Harris said. “Social service agencies are literally deciding whether to shut their doors, so this proposal would be a lifeline to them as the larger negotiations go on.”
The governor has repeatedly said he would oppose a stopgap budget unless he got term limits and a permanent property tax freeze, however.
…Adding…. More details on the House Dems’ proposal can be found by clicking here.
* Related…
* Illinois public employee union strategy to fight for pensions: Members should “do nothing” and let Madigan be our goalie.
50 Comments
|
* As the Tribune editorial board notes, more than half the states require special elections in cases like this…
Voters on Chicago’s South Side didn’t have a choice last year in the race for the 27th House district. Longtime Rep. Monique Davis, D-Chicago, briefly faced a challenge from Justin Slaughter, but he dropped out before the primary. Davis ran unopposed in the November election.
Then just before Christmas, she filed paperwork to retire from the seat she has held since 1987. But voters won’t pick her replacement. Local Democratic leaders did it for them. A handful of Chicago aldermen and suburban township committeemen met privately Thursday and selected Slaughter, a Chicago resident who works for the Cook County Board, to fill Davis’ seat. Surprise, 27th District voters! You have a new state rep.
It’s a maddening pattern repeated by lawmakers from both parties: They resign midterm or just before or after an election when it’s too late for someone else to compete for the seat. The timing triggers a process that allows local power brokers to choose the next lawmaker.
Roughly one-third of the 177 lawmakers serving in the House and Senate first got their seats in the General Assembly because they were appointed, not elected. An appointed lawmaker still has to run for the seat in the next election cycle, but he or she gets a head start, sometimes nearly a full term, in Springfield. They gain access to staff, campaign donors and special interest groups. Their political patrons prop them up by giving them popular, noncontroversial bills to sponsor. They have all the benefits of incumbency, including campaign lawyers, advice and money.
Slaughter is highly qualified and should do a decent job.
Look, I know that special elections cost money, but other states manage just fine.
* Meanwhile…
In Georgia, lawmakers are set to pass a more than $20 billion budget this year and grapple with a failing hospital system.
But Georgia, like many other states, faces a serious human resource problem in its Legislature: Salaries are often low and many would-be politicians can’t afford to be lawmakers.
Former Georgia state Rep. LaDawn Jones loved serving in the General Assembly even as she juggled raising two kids and running a law practice. But she left after one term because the job didn’t pay enough.
“I absolutely believe that we need to increase the wage for legislators to keep up with the times,” said Jones.
Lawmakers in Georgia make $17,342 a year, plus a per diem for lodging and meals when the Legislature is in session and reimbursement for mileage. Serving in the Georgia Legislature is considered a part-time job, but it took much more of Jones’ time than that and she had to hire extra help for her law firm. […]
That low level of pay also keeps many people from entering politics, said Malhotra. “There’s very, very few working class people in legislatures. This might have something to do with why a lot of legislation does not seem very friendly towards working class people.”
We have the opposite situation in Illinois, where legislators make a base pay of about $67K per year, plus other stipends for leadership or top committee slots.
* And speaking of that topic…
The state’s bill backlog has surpassed $11 billion and there’s no budget in place, but two suburban Republican lawmakers each will get extra $1,506 checks for two days of work this week.
House Republican Leader Jim Durkin tells me the move is the only way to get around Democratic House Speaker Michael Madigan’s seniority rules.
Durkin late last week named Rep. Peter Breen, of Lombard, and Rep. Keith Wheeler, of Oswego, to leadership posts. But instead of making it effective when a new session begins Wednesday, Durkin named Breen and Wheeler to the posts for Monday and Tuesday, the final two days of the 99th General Assembly.
The $1,506 stipends are for one month of work in those roles. Members of the General Assembly make a base salary of $67,836. Breen and Wheeler’s stipends would be $18,066 apiece if they’re kept in leadership a full year.
Durkin, of Western Springs, says he appointed the two because he wants them to serve as committee spokesmen. House rules say those positions can be held only by lawmakers with three terms of seniority, which Breen and Wheeler lack, or with leadership appointments.
I was told around 9 o’clock this morning that the HGOPs would be checking with those two members to see if they’ll be accepting their stipends. I’ll let you know if I get an answer.
*** UPDATE *** I’m told neither Republican will accept the leadership stipends. Instead, they’re refund the stipends back to the state.
18 Comments
|
* From the ILGOP…
Extra! Extra! Boss Madigan Democrats Get Morning Delivery
Madigan’s Post-It Note Commands, Metra Scandal Top the Headlines
With three days left until Decision Day, Boss Madigan Democrats will receive envelopes from the Illinois Republican Party containing information they may wish to consider before supporting Madigan for a 17th term as Speaker.
The envelope will contain the Chicago Tribune’s scathing report and editorial about Boss Madigan’s use of post-it notes to inappropriately direct hiring decisions at Metra through “ward-style patronage”.
As a reminder, the Chicago Tribune reported that,
“A secret report put together by the legislature’s watchdog in the wake of last summer’s Metra scandal offers new insight into how Democratic House Speaker Michael Madigan navigates the intersection of public business and ward-style patronage through his Southwest Side office and Illinois Capitol suite.
The analysis by then-Inspector General Thomas Homer — based on interviews with Madigan’s political allies, government officials and the speaker himself — presents those methods in an unflattering fashion.
The report contains an account of Metra’s chairwoman entering Madigan’s Capitol office to talk about state issues and leaving with a yellow Post-it note bearing names of two workers the speaker wanted to see promoted. In another meeting, a Metra lobbyist who was a longtime Madigan aide was spotted leaving the speaker’s office with two resumes. Another time, Madigan simply called the cellphone of one of his “better” precinct captains to tell him about a state job, according to the report.”
The envelope also contains a warning from Boss Madigan himself, in true post-it note patronage boss fashion.
Today’s delivery is part of the Illinois Republican Party’s countdown to Wednesday’s election for Speaker.
Now, Democrats have no excuse for being in the dark about Madigan’s ethical problems.
Will they still support him?
* Some sample packages…
But, remember, the governor has nothing whatsoever to do with influencing a chamber’s leadership election, except for the fact that he’s funding just about every dime of state party spending. But, still… no involvement whatsoever!
…Adding… As noted in comments, it’s a bit ironic that the party is talking about patronage hiring after Friday’s SJ-R story. Just sayin…
48 Comments
|
The power of the press?
Monday, Jan 9, 2017 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Friday afternoon, the Tribune published a story entitled “Bill to require school lead testing stalls in Springfield“…
Despite renewed national attention to the dangers of lead plumbing, most schools and day care centers still aren’t required to guarantee the safety of drinking water provided to children who are most vulnerable to the toxic metal. […]
Given the widespread use of lead in Illinois during the last century — Chicago required lead plumbing until it was banned nationwide in 1986 — Attorney General Lisa Madigan and public health advocates are pushing legislation that would require every Illinois school and day care center to regularly test water for a potent neurotoxin that can trigger learning disabilities and violent behavior. […]
But with only two days remaining in the current legislative session, the attorney general’s bill is on hold in a House committee, stalled after Gov. Bruce Rauner’s administration announced it opposed the measure and proposed rival legislation in late November.
The governor’s bill would allow schools to conduct detailed plumbing inventories instead of testing drinking fountains for lead. It also would order state health officials to develop their own standards for lead in drinking water — a task traditionally handled by federal authorities after years of study. […]
“If you don’t require testing, how are you supposed to know if there is a problem?” said Jennifer Walling, executive director of the Illinois Environmental Council, which helped draft the attorney general’s legislation. “The governor’s approach also could end up being more expensive for schools that already are concerned about costs.”
The article noted that the Rauner administration “appeared to soften their opposition to Madigan’s bill Friday.” Notably, this change apparently came after reporter Michael Hawthorne started checking around.
* From the governor’s press office this morning…
The following is an excerpt of a story from Politico Illinois:
Illinois public schools and licensed daycare facilities will be required to test drinking water for lead contamination under a major compromise reached by key stakeholders, parties involved in the deal told POLITICO Illinois.
Long-running negotiations among environmental groups, lawmakers, the Illinois Attorney General’s Office and the governor’s office culminated in a compromise late last week, according to Gov. Bruce Rauner’s office and the Illinois Environmental Council. […]
The agreed terms include a framework of the existing bill, pushed for months by Lisa Madigan’s office and others: schools built before the year 2000 that serve students fifth grade and younger, would be required to test for lead in all its drinking water sources, as well as sources of water used for cooking at the schools. Also, licensed day care centers would also be required to test water sources. A compromise effort ramped up by Rauner’s office since the veto session helped bring opponents on board, Walling said. […]
Walling said the amendment that is expected to be added to the bill on Monday is “the framework that the AG had been working on,” and includes technical tweaks pursued by Rauner’s office: “The agencies and the governor’s office did work (to bring compromise); they helped bring major stakeholders on board,” she said. […]
“Since its introduction, the administration met regularly with the proponents and the other stakeholders throughout the fall, as well as during the fall veto session and all of December to address some of the concerns raised with the original language,” (Gov. Rauner) spokeswoman Allie Bovis said.
However, a source close to the negotiations said today that “the only opponents the Rauner administration helped to bring on board was their own agencies.”
Three Rauner agencies had registered in opposition to the bill last year.
…Adding… The Rauner folks claim they told the Tribune on Friday that a “deal was done,” but the paper went ahead with the story anyway.
…Adding More… That same source close to the negotiations said that on Friday the Rauner administration was merely attempting to get itself to neutral.
4 Comments
|
[Reader comments are now open on this post.]
* From the International Union of Operating Engineers Local 150…
In a decision issued on January 7th, United States District Judge Matthew Kennelly found that the local “right to work” law passed by the Village of Lincolnshire, Illinois in 2015 is pre-empted by federal law, and that only states and territories have the authority to [enact] such laws. Local 150 and three other plaintiffs were granted summary judgment, with the court ruling on the merits without need for a full trial.
The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) permits States and Territories the authority to regulate union security agreements via “right to work” laws. Arguing that local units of government have no authority to pass such laws, four unions filed a federal lawsuit against Lincolnshire in early 2016. The plaintiffs were the International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE) Locals 150 and 399, the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters and the Laborers District Council of Chicago and Vicinity.
Judge Kennelly concluded that the NLRA “does not permit local subdivisions to regulate union security agreements.” Additionally, Kennelly found that Lincolnshire has no authority under federal law to regulate union hiring halls or “dues checkoff” agreements between unions and workers they represent.
“We have long argued that local governments simply are not empowered to pass these laws, and we are pleased with Judge Kennelly’s decision,” said IUOE Local 150 President-Business Manager James M. Sweeney. “This was a political attack against middle class workers, and we will always take up the fight on behalf of workers who depend on decent wages and benefits to support themselves and their families.”
The full opinion is here.
I’ll open comments on Monday.
13 Comments
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
|
|
Hosted by MCS |
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax |
Advertise Here |
Mobile Version |
Contact Rich Miller
|