|
Thoughts on next week’s session
Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 - Posted by Rich Miller * First of all, despite what you may be reading, the session beginning next Wednesday will not cost taxpayers $50,000 a day…
The governor will not actually be calling a “special session,” which would require that members receive their per diem checks. Per diem can’t be disbursed for regular session days after the end of May, and that’s what next week’s session will be. The two chamber leaders are calling their members back to town, so the taxpayers won’t be on the hook for that extra cost. * Speaking of money, as I told you on Monday, the General Assembly has not yet passed a legislative furlough plan…
Because this won’t be a special session, the General Assembly won’t be limited to what it can and cannot do. Members could take up that furlough plan, but there is opposition in the Senate. The media has completely ignored this failure to approve another furlough plan, so legislators may just ignore it. * Now, onto the budget. The Senate Democrats were clearly hoping that Quinn would ally with them over their additional budgetary spending tacked onto the capital/road bill. As subscribers knew, the SDems also unveiled a plan a few days ago to extend the capital/road plan for just six months, so that the budget could be renegotiated in January. But Quinn wouldn’t go along with either plan…
Yesterday’s meeting was a huge blow to the Senate Dems. They’re teleconferencing today to decide what to do. If they refuse to give in, we’re in for a nasty summer session. * After some initial hesitation, the Republicans have decided that Quinn is right and that the state can’t fund construction projects after the end of the fiscal year and will have to start shutting down projects on Monday…
Agreeing with the governor simply puts more pressure on the recalcitrant Senate Democrats. * Related…
|
| « NEWER POSTS | PREVIOUS POSTS » |







