One down, one to go
Wednesday, May 3, 2006 - Posted by Rich Miller
AP:
The Illinois House approved a $56 billion state budget Wednesday that emphasizes education and public safety while leaving some major costs for future years.
The budget, which now goes to the Senate, includes money to expand preschool programs, offer more grants to college students and increase general education spending.
It also would allow for about 250 additional prison guards, specialized treatment for inmates addicted to methamphetamine, new state police cars and improvements in testing DNA evidence.
23 Comments
|
|
Enter your password to view comments
|
Question of the day
Wednesday, May 3, 2006 - Posted by Rich Miller
First, the setup:
Blagojevich’s Republican opponent in the Nov. 7 election, state Treasurer Judy Baar Topinka, called on Tuesday for a constitutional amendment to require that the budget be made public for a week before the Legislature could vote on it.
Topinka said the current system in Illinois - in which budget negotiations are conducted in secret between the governor and a handful of top lawmakers, then rubber-stamped by the Legislature - was “absolutely stupid.”
Rebecca Rausch, a spokeswoman for Gov. Rod Blagojevich, dismissed Topinka’s proposal as “a gimmick.”
Read more here if you want.
Do you think this is a good idea? Why or why not?
UPDATE: And then there’s the little issue of how candidate Rod Blagojevich proposed a 48-hour budget review period when he was running for governor in 2002…
(I accidentally added this update to the wrong post earlier. Oops.)
68 Comments
|
The Meeks beat
Wednesday, May 3, 2006 - Posted by Rich Miller
Meeks talked to the press yesterday during an event with AFSCME.
State Sen. James Meeks on Tuesday still wouldn’t say if he plans to launch a third-party bid for governor.
“If I was going to run for governor, I’m sure you wouldn’t want me to give the answer standing on the sidewalk,” he said at a news conference outside an Illinois Department of Human Services office on the city’s South Side. […]
Meeks said Tuesday that a new poll he commissioned shows him taking voters away from the Republican candidate, state Treasurer Judy Baar Topinka.
Capitol Fax subscribers saw that poll yesterday.
25 Comments
|
C’mon, Sheila
Wednesday, May 3, 2006 - Posted by Rich Miller
I missed this one yesterday. They really should at least try to tell some semblance of the truth at Blagojevich Central.
In the advertisement, an announcer says Topinka “sits on a board that oversees $10 billion in state pension investments,” and that “for 11 years, she’s never attended a single meeting. Not one.”
“That’s the kind of no-show job I’d like,” a man says in the ad, followed by the announcer saying, “Eighty missed meetings. What’s she thinking?”
Dave Loveday, Topinka campaign spokesman, said Monday it is “hypocritical of them to throw this out when she sends a representative, when he (the governor), too, is an ex officio representative” on boards he does not attend.
Sheila Nix, spokeswoman for the Blagojevich campaign, said “the key difference” is that Topinka is a voting member on the pension board, while Blagojevich appoints members of the tollway and university panels, but “he’s non-voting,” at least on the U of I board.
“If you appoint people to the board, … they carry out your priorities,” Nix said.
Actually, the governor is on each board “ex officio,” meaning by virtue of his office, but spokespeople at both boards say he is a voting member.
[Emphasis added.]
18 Comments
|
Lane Evans open thread
Wednesday, May 3, 2006 - Posted by Rich Miller
· Evans finally withdraws.
U.S. Rep. Lane Evans, D-Ill., submitted his official withdrawal from the November general election ballot in a letter sent Monday to the Illinois State Board of Elections.
When the letter is received in Springfield today, it will pave the way for Democrats in the 17th District to finalize the race for a replacement candidate.
Don Johnston, the 17th District state central committeeman, said a nomination meeting will be held in Galesburg about one week after Evans’ official withdrawal. That meeting will be exclusively for the purpose of nominating and seconding candidates, with the actual voting by precinct committeemen done through a mail ballot sent out shortly after the meeting. […]
Although a judge, citing Evans’ health problems, appointed his brothers as temporary guardians with the power to make decisions on financial and medical matters, the congressman did sign the withdrawal of candidacy form himself, his aides said.
· Meanwhile, a former Evans aide has endorsed Sen. John Sullivan for the spot.
Jeremiah Posedel, who also was the downstate director for U.S. Sen. Barack Obama’s 2004 campaign, said Sullivan would best represent the 17th Congressional District, which includes all or parts of 23 counties.
“I’ve been to every single county in that district. I just thought John Sullivan was the best fit,†he said Monday. Posedel said that Sullivan, like Evans and Obama, is “above a lot of the political fray.â€
Posedel, 27, was Evans’ political director from 2001-04, and is now a law student at the University of Illinois at Champaign. He sent an e-mail over the weekend making the endorsement. The Sullivan campaign is expected to announce it later this week, he said.
· John Sullivan is profiled here and here.
What have you heard?
30 Comments
|
Marin goes all-out
Wednesday, May 3, 2006 - Posted by Rich Miller
I get the distinct impression that Carol Marin is not a happy camper.
If George Bush is the Great Decider, Rod Blagojevich is the Great Proposer.
Call a big news conference. Invite the press. Prop up all those good government types behind you for the photo op and look like you really mean “No more business as usual.”
And then, fast as you can say George Ryan, get back to business as usual. […]
I don’t know about you but I’ve had about all I can stand of charm and good hair in Illinois politics.
She even includes all of the governor’s contact information. Go read the whole thing. “Stinging” doesn’t even begin to describe it.
10 Comments
|
Morning shorts
Wednesday, May 3, 2006 - Posted by Rich Miller
· No longer just a rumor: Sheila Simon announces bid for mayor
· Midway lease clears House; Chicago could reap billions
· American Airlines to leave Midway
· Sun-Times: Topinka urged to back gov’s mercury plan… Medill: Topinka Joins Blagojevich In Call To Limit Mercury
· Illinois has no helmet requirement for motorcyclists
· Immigrant numbers by state
· Press worried Ryan judge, lawyers
· What they said
· Major congratulations to my buddy Ryan Hermes for his new promotion to Statehouse Bureau Chief for the Illinois Radio Network. Also, a big welcome to Melissa Hahn, who has joined the IRN Statehouse staff.
3 Comments
|
The State Journal-Register published this OpEd today. It’s definitely worth a read.
I have the very challenging and honorable position of being a nursing home administrator and the good fortune to have more than 30 years of nursing to my credit. […]
What began as delayed payments has now reached what could be interpreted as payments that have come to a screeching halt. Consequently, I not only walked into a financial nightmare with the state of Illinois’ public aid system, things have now progressed from nightmare to hell on bureaucratic wheels.
My facility is one of several in Illinois that is still independently owned and our Public Aid census average is approximately 78 to 79 percent. I don’t have the security of a “mother corporation†to fall back on when Public Aid fails to release our checks in a timely manner. […]
Our bank’s benevolence and our vendors’ understanding can’t last forever when the state of Illinois interprets the releasing of our checks in a “timely manner†as once every six, seven, eight, nine, 10, 11, 12 weeks or longer. I’m sure that some of our legislators are or have been independent businessmen and women. So, I ask all of you who represent us in this state government - does your paycheck arrive in this manner? Do you pay your bills on time and if not, how long before you start seeing finance charges mounting up or your utility companies’ disconnection?
My office personnel informed me recently that we finally received a voucher number from Public Aid. Now for those of you who aren’t familiar with this, it means we can now “get in line†to possibly receive our check for November’s care in the “near†future.
Yes, I said November. Considering that we haven’t received a check from Public Aid for approximately three months, all I can ask is, what’s wrong with this picture?
Read the whole thing.
27 Comments
|
|
Comments Off
|
Question of the day
Tuesday, May 2, 2006 - Posted by Rich Miller
I’m often asked what sort of people comment on this blog. The truth is, I’m not quite sure. Some are Capitol Fax subscribers, some are insiders, some are obviously not.
So, without “outing” yourself in any way, let’s hear from you about what you do. Are you an “insider” or an “outsider”? Any details would be interesting.
UPDATE: I should point out that most people who read this blog don’t comment, and the vast majority of those are “insiders” in one way or another. This question is for those who do comment, either occasionally or regularly.
87 Comments
|
Reformers demand reform
Tuesday, May 2, 2006 - Posted by Rich Miller
I suggested in a recent Capitol Fax that the goo-goos need to start playing a little hardball if they want to get anything done in Springfield this spring. This morning, a coalition of good government groups is putting some pressure on Gov. Blagojevich with the following open letter (edited for length):
Dear Governor Blagojevich:
We’re fast approaching the one-year anniversary of the day you unveiled a proposal to limit campaign donations by individuals, to ban corporate and union contributions, to close the revolving door on legislators becoming lobbyists and to strengthen the enforcement powers of the State Board of Elections.
At the time, your critics said you weren’t serious about the proposal and that it was nothing more than “damage control†needed to reverse a slide in public opinion polls that followed weeks of news articles about terrible state audits and big contributors getting big state contracts.
Because you released the details of your proposal with less than three weeks remaining in the spring 2005 legislative session, legislators from both political parties questioned your commitment to passing the legislation.
To date, you’ve done little to prove your critics wrong.
Even though the presiding officers of the General Assembly are co-chairs of your re-election campaign and have helped pass your other major initiatives, your reform legislation hasn’t even been the topic of a legislative committee hearing.
A year ago, you told reporters; “The legislators will have a clear choice on whether or not they want to pass it or not. We’re going to do our best to try to pass it. We’ll keep pushing that. I think it will be dramatic and a significant reform.†We haven’t heard much from you since.
In February, 2006, you told the Chicago Tribune that the time wasn’t right. You said, “you have to pick your fights at the right time to get such legislation passed.†Our question is: if not now, when?
In the year since you promised to “rock the system in Springfield,†Illinoisans have been rocked all right, but not by your legislation. […]
Now is the time to pass meaningful reform laws. […]
When you set your mind to it, Governor, you have demonstrated how persuasive you can be in passing major pieces of legislation, including the ethics reforms of 2003.
Will you give your own campaign and government reform proposal the same dedication, the same commitment, the same degree of support? Or were your critics correct in saying this was nothing more than a cynical attempt to divert attention from your own fundraising practices?
Will you bring legislative leaders to the table this week and negotiate sweeping reforms that include the major elements of your plan from last spring?
What will it take to change the culture in state government? Do the people of Illinois have to wait until another politician is tried and convicted of wrongdoing, or is enough, enough?
We urge you to act now, and we stand ready to assist.
The groups signing the letter were the Illinois Campaign for Political Reform, The League of Women Voters of Illinois, Citizen’s Advocacy Center, Protestants for the Common Good, the Better Government Association, the Sunshine Project, Illinois PIRG and Illinois Common Cause.
11 Comments
|
Guv’s Inspector General opposes reform bill
Tuesday, May 2, 2006 - Posted by Rich Miller
Rep. Fritchey wonders what the heck is going on.
So I’m looking through the latest supplemental calendar and I come across HB4572, which has had its deadline for passage extended. This is an interesting bill that deals with some of the secrecy issues that have been raised by Ethics Commission Chairman Scott Turow and others, although it still leaves a lot of issues unresolved. […]
According to the analysis, one proponent has stepped out in favor of the bill - the Executive Inspector General of the Treasurer’s Office. At the same time, only one entity has come out against the bill - the Executive Inspector General of the Governor’s Office. Go figure.
Here is the summary of the bill:
(i) Allows an Inspector General to disclose the name of a confidential source to employees of the Inspector General or Ethics Commission who need the information for proper performance of their employment functions;
(ii) Allows a law enforcement agency, an ultimate jurisdictional authority, an Ethics Commission, or another Inspector General who received information from an Inspector General to disclose the information to their employees who need the information for proper performance of their employment functions;
(iii) Allows the subject of an Inspector General file or report to request, in writing, a copy of the report and gives the ultimate jurisdictional authority discretion to release a redacted copy of the file or report;
(iv) Makes it a Class A misdemeanor to intentionally disclose the name of an individual providing information or reporting alleged misconduct (except to employees of the Inspector General or Ethics Commission); and
(v) Makes it a Class A misdemeanor to disclose information contained in an Inspector General report if the person disclosing is an employee of an entity receiving information from a report in order to perform their job or the person who was the subject of an investigation who received a redacted copy (with an exception for disclosing information to a personal attorney or union representative).
5 Comments
|
Gay marriage petition story
Tuesday, May 2, 2006 - Posted by Rich Miller
The media is finally starting to awaken to the gay marriage petition drive.
Opponents of gay marriage hope to give voters a chance to speak out on the issue through an advisory referendum this fall, a move that could affect political races by bringing more conservatives to the polls.
Organizers of “Protect Marriage Illinois” predicted Monday that they will have enough signatures — thousands more than the 283,111 needed — to get a referendum on the November ballot.
It would ask voters whether they think the Illinois Constitution should define marriage between a man and a woman as the only valid legal union in Illinois. The results won’t change the constitution but could influence whether lawmakers ever take that step.
“The people don’t want their children taught in school that marriage is between one man and another man,” David E. Smith, project director for Protect Marriage Illinois.
Critics argue the petition drive is just an attempt to mobilize conservative voters.
Read the whole thing.
13 Comments
|
Blagojevich skips meetings, too
Tuesday, May 2, 2006 - Posted by Rich Miller
This is a good response by Topinka’s campaign. The problem is, Topinka is firing back with earned media (where few will see it) and not with corresponding TV ads (where most will see it).
Gov. Rod Blagojevich has been skipping meetings of some important state boards but criticizing his Republican opponent for similar behavior, leading to accusations of hypocrisy Monday.
Blagojevich’s latest campaign ad criticizes Republican Judy Baar Topinka, the state treasurer, for not attending meetings of the Illinois State Board of Investment, which oversees the money for state pension systems. Topinka has “ex officio” status with full voting powers.
But Blagojevich is also an ex officio member of some boards, and he doesn’t attend their meetings either. The Democratic governor, during more than three years in office, has never attended a meeting of the University of Illinois board of trustees or the Toll Highway Authority.
“That is so typical of Governor Blagojevich,” said Topinka campaign spokesman David Loveday. “He says one thing and does another. That’s why he has a credibility problem with the voters.” […]
But Blagojevich spokeswoman Sheila Nix denied any hypocrisy. The governor appoints university trustees and Tollway directors, Nix said, so he influences policy without having to attend meetings himself. Topinka doesn’t appoint the investment board, so her only influence is showing up and taking part, Nix said.
6 Comments
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
|
Hosted by MCS |
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax |
Advertise Here |
Mobile Version |
Contact Rich Miller
|