Question of the day - Golden Horseshoe Awards
Wednesday, Dec 3, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The 2014 Golden Horseshoe Award for best political bar in Springfield goes to DH Brown’s…
Good atmosphere and service. Also agree that it is starting to attract both political parties, which is great to see.
Brown’s used to be known as a “Republican tavern,” but it’s now far more “bipartisan.”
* The 2014 Golden Horseshoe Award for best political restaurant in Springfield goes to Obed & Isaac’s…
Their food is fantastic (leg of lamb sandwich, anyone?!), brews and spirits are some of the tastiest in town, and some of the best political convos among staffers take place there. Not to mention their beer garden is great in April for its bocce ball.
O&I is a tad bit outside the usual “sandbox” area, but it’s still close enough to attract a sizable Statehouse crowd.
* OK, on to our next category, with last year’s winners in parentheses…
* The Beth Hamilton Golden Horseshoe Award for Best House Secretary/Admin. Assistant: (Jody Aiello)
* Best Senate Secretary/Admin. Assistant: (Anita Colvin-Barth)
Remember to explain your vote, please.
46 Comments
|
Union local stabs Rahm in the back
Wednesday, Dec 3, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Tribune…
Chicago mayoral hopeful Jesus “Chuy” Garcia more than doubled the amount of cash in his campaign fund Tuesday by depositing a single check from a major government workers union, but it did little to close the growing money advantage Mayor Rahm Emanuel has in his bid for a second term.
Garcia, a Cook County commissioner, reported a $250,000 contribution from the Service Employees International Union Healthcare political fund, driving up the amount he’s raised to $477,000.
* Subscribers know a bit more, but here’s Greg Hinz…
News of the big donation came on the same day that the City Council overwhelmingly approved Emanuel’s plan to boost the city’s minimum wage to $13 an hour over the next five years. Some activists had pushed for a $15 figure, including Garcia.
The SEIU Healthcare donation came even though SEIU’s state council a few days ago tentatively decided to remain neutral in the race for mayor.
* And then Greg updated…
In a statement, SEIU State Council President Balanoff confirmed something he wouldn’t tell me earlier: That last week’s meeting resulted in “a formal vote . . . to remain neutral in the Chicago mayor’s race.”
He adds, “The subsequent contribution to a mayoral candidate by SEIU Healthcare Illinois Indiana is in direct violation of that vote and the constitution and bylaws of the Illinois State Council. The violation will be addressed through SEIU’s official internal processes.”
Looks like the fight is on.
So, the SEIU Healthcare local spends a fortune on voter registration and GOTV for Gov. Pat Quinn’s campaign and his $10 an hour minimum wage proposal, then pushes the state council to endorse Garcia over Emanuel, even though Emanuel is for a $13 an hour minimum wage, but after the state council votes to remain officially neutral, the local violates its own union constitution to give a quarter million bucks to Garcia.
Oy.
And, from what I’m told, SEIU Healthcare now wants to disband the state council, but that can’t be done, either.
* From SEIU’s constitution…
Any Local Union or affiliated body willfully neglecting to enforce the provisions of this Constitution and Bylaws shall be subject to suspension or revocation of its charter or such other sanctions as may be determined by the International President.
29 Comments
|
Irony alert!
Wednesday, Dec 3, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller
* You’ve probably already seen this story about Elizabeth Lauten…
“Dear Sasha and Malia, I get you’re both in those awful teen years, but you’re part of the First Family, try showing a little class,” she wrote in a Facebook post. “Rise to the occasion. Act like being in the White House matters to you. Dress like you deserve respect, not a spot at a bar.”
The remarks didn’t go over well. After a wave of negative publicity, Lauten on Monday resigned her position with Republican Rep. Stephen Lee Fincher of Tennessee. “After many hours of prayer, talking to my parents, and re-reading my words online I can see more clearly just how hurtful my words were,” Lauten explained in a statement, saying her comments had been extemporaneous.
* The Tribune talked to her former boss…
The staffer, Elizabeth Lauten, has been working for Rep. Stephen Fincher of Tennessee after a 2011 stint as the congressional spokeswoman for controversial one-term U.S. Rep. Joe Walsh, an Illinois Republican.
Walsh, now a radio talk show host, told the Tribune on Monday that “Elizabeth should have kept her mouth quiet.”
Fill in the blank: Joe Walsh saying somebody “should have kept her mouth quiet” is like ______.
60 Comments
|
* Tribune…
In residential treatment centers across Illinois, children are assaulted, sexually abused and running away by the thousands — yet state officials fail to act on reports of harm and continue sending waves of youths to the most troubled and violent facilities, a Tribune investigation found.
At a cost to taxpayers of well over $200 million per year, the residential centers promise round-the-clock supervision and therapy to state wards with histories of abuse and neglect, as well as other disadvantaged youths with mental health and behavioral problems. On any given day, about 1,400 wards live in the centers, although far more cycle through each year.
In the best cases, the facilities rebuild and even save young lives. But the Tribune found that many underprivileged youths — most of them African-American — are shuttled for years from one grim institution to another before emerging more damaged than when they went in.
* Just one example…
At Indian Oaks, which specializes in treating children who have endured sexual trauma, the Tribune identified 17 reports of sexual assault or abuse during a 21/2-year period starting in September 2011. Facility reports to DCFS and police dismissed nearly half of those incidents as consensual, even when alleged victims were not old enough to consent or had cognitive impairments.
* And…
The state’s beleaguered child welfare agency, which has had four directors in the past year and seen its budget sliced by more than 10 percent since 2009, is more than a year behind in analyzing facility performance records that show how many days kids go on the run from each center, or are sent to jail or psychiatric hospitals.
Go read the whole thing, but prepare to be thoroughly disgusted.
28 Comments
|
* From In These Times…
AFSCME’s and other unions’ efforts failed to prevent Rauner’s victory over Quinn, and Illinois public employees now face an uncertain future. When their contract expires in July 2015, workers will have to renegotiate with a governor who has questioned the very validity of collective bargaining rights for public employees (and even refused to say whether he believes such rights are valid for any kind of worker).
The union is planning to meet with Rauner for the first time in early December to talk contracts. In preparation, the 200-plus members of the AFSCME contract team convened in Springfield, Illinois, last week to hold a “demands meeting.”
No one knows but Rauner how he will engage with AFSCME, says Brent Eliot (not his real name), a delegate from an Illinois city, and this led to a tense demands meeting.
On the one hand, says Eliot, the union emphasized readiness in case “things go badly” with Rauner, setting up a phone tree among members to quickly communicate about workplace actions such as a “button day” (when all employees at a given workplace don pins with a common message), wearing all the same shirt to work, or going out to the street on lunch break to picket.
Because of a no-strike clause in their current contract, AFSCME members are not allowed to strike—Eliot says that AFSCME discourages workers from even using the word “strike.”
“It was stressed to us at the meeting that we’d have to [report] back to our members that we’ve got to get ready—not to strike, but to do something,” says Eliot.
On the other hand, Eliot claims that leadership at the meeting censured some of the more ambitious proposals for demands that came from the contract team, pushing for more “modesty” in their bargaining, though he declined to give details about what those scaled-back proposals were.
Discuss.
98 Comments
|
He may very well be underestimating the problem
Wednesday, Dec 3, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From yesterday…
Rauner also outlined a series of financial pressures he said totaled $1.4 billion, citing budget gimmicks mostly identified when the General Assembly left town last spring. The items included borrowing as much as $650 million from state funds set aside for myriad specially designated purposes.
The Republican lashed out at what he called “dishonest” Democrat-approved financial tricks, saying the price tag of the current year’s budget was masked by absorbing some of the costs in a previous budget to make the current one look better. In other cases, Rauner maintained that expenses were deferred and will be pushed into the coming year.
* Here is Rauner’s breakdown. You can click the pic for a larger image…
* But Rauner shouldn’t have been so surprised. This is what I wrote back in June of this year…
I based what follows on what I know about how the budget was crafted. But whatever the final number ends up being, it’s crystal clear that whoever wins the governor’s race will face a monstrous challenge after he’s sworn in next January.
Borrowing $660 million from special state funds, as this new budget does, is a one-off affair. The money is being put into the state’s spending base and will have to somehow be replaced the following year. A two-year repayment plan means another $330 million will also have to be found in the next budget, for a total hole of about a billion dollars.
Using about $500 million in one-time revenue increases from this fiscal year to pay forward some bills in next fiscal year means that same $500 million will have to be found again when the next budget is crafted.
Not funding employee salary and health insurance-benefit-cost increases kicks another $380 million down the road. So, now we’re at $1.9 billion. […]
Also, Rep. Greg Harris, who chairs a House appropriations committee, told reporters last week that the new budget could create as much as a “couple of billion” dollars in past-due bills in the coming fiscal year. If that’s accurate, then the FY16 hole becomes much, much worse, plus there’s all that new debt owed to providers which will eventually have to be paid back.
…Adding… Don’t forget that the state’s pension payment is expected to rise by almost a billion dollars next fiscal year.
81 Comments
|
Always bet on nothing
Wednesday, Dec 3, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller
* That sound you hear is a big House thud…
House Speaker Michael Madigan told fellow Democrats on Tuesday that the 98th General Assembly will adjourn with the end of business, state Rep. Jack Franks, D-Marengo, said. Lawmakers will next reconvene Jan. 14 with the seating of the 99th General Assembly.
This also means that there will be no January lame-duck session in which legislation can get rammed through by outgoing lawmakers, including any extension of the 2011 income tax increase set to substantially expire Jan. 1.
Madigan spokesman Steve Brown confirmed the news, and said that while Madigan firmly believes in raising the minimum wage, the number of different versions and conflicting interests are preventing him from marshaling the needed votes.
Franks said the move also may be a gesture of good faith on Madigan’s part.
“I think maybe he wants to work with the new governor. Who knows?” Franks said. “This might be an olive branch.”
* Greg Hinz…
The “complications” that Brown referenced was a decision by Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel to move ahead on his own with a city wage hike that is even higher than one that had been contemplated by state lawmakers.
A state bill, raising the current $8.25 figure to $9 to $11 an hour, “is totally dead,” said state Rep. Jack Franks, a McHenry County Democrat, “because of what happened in Chicago.”
Earlier in the day, the City Council voted 44-5, at Emanuel’s request, to raise the minimum wage to $10 in July and $13 by mid-2019. Emanuel said he acted in part because one version of proposed state legislation would have pre-empted action by Chicago, holding the city to a rate no higher than that of the rest of the state.
Mr. Rauner, who takes office in January, has said he’ll sign a wage hike only if it is linked to pro-business moves such as enacting tort reform and changes in the workers’ compensation system.
11 Comments
|
Good morning!
Wednesday, Dec 3, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From the New York Times…
Bobby Keys, a Texas-born sideman whose urgent, wailing saxophone solos wove a prominent thread through more than 40 years of rock ’n’ roll, notably with the Rolling Stones, died on Tuesday at his home in Franklin, Tenn. He was 70.
His family announced the death, without specifying a cause.
A self-taught musician who never learned to read music, Mr. Keys was a rock ’n’ roller in every sense of the term. Born (almost literally) in the shadow of Buddy Holly, he was a lifelong devotee and practitioner of music with a driving pulse and a hard-living, semi-law-abiding participant in the late-night, sex-booze-and-drug-flavored world of musical celebrity. […]
Mostly playing tenor and sometimes baritone saxophone, he recorded with a Who’s Who of rock including Chuck Berry, Eric Clapton, John Lennon, George Harrison, Carly Simon, Country Joe and the Fish, Harry Nilsson, Joe Cocker and Sheryl Crow. He toured with Delaney and Bonnie and was recording with them in 1969 when they shared a Los Angeles studio with the Stones, who were making their album “Let It Bleed.”
* He was our greatest ever rock saxophonist, and here he is at his very best. Turn it up…
13 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
* A cynic might say that this is the beginning of Bruce Rauner’s “Jim Thompson Moment”…
At a Statehouse news conference, Rauner said the state budget passed by lawmakers last spring is full of “booby traps” that make the budget worse than it appears on paper.
“The deficit is far worse than has been discussed,” Rauner said.
Rauner distributed a paper outlining $1.4 billion in additional budget pressures facing next year’s budget that he said are the result of “gimmicks” used to make the current state budget appear balanced. That is on top of revenue the state expects to lose from the partial expiration of the temporary income tax increase.
“It was a phony budget. It was not even close to balanced,” Rauner said.
However, Rauner again declined to offer specifics of how he plans to address the budget problems, including whether it will be necessary to keep some of the temporary income tax hike in place.
“We thought it was horrible, but it’s sooooooooo much worse than we ever could’ve possibly imagined!!!”
* More…
So, now he can blame Rod Blagojevich and Pat Quinn for whatever comes next.
115 Comments
|
* For whatever reason, state treasurer-elect Michael Frerichs’ campaign staff is still trying to distance their guy from the notion that Chicago put Frerichs over the top. From a press release…
Official Returns Show Central Illinois Key to Victory for Frerichs
Nearly 30,000 Rauner-Frerichs independent voters stretching from Quincy to Danville, Peoria to Hillsboro
SPRINGFIELD, IL –The Illinois State Board of Elections certified results from the November election on Sunday, declaring Michael Frerichs the next State Treasurer by a margin of only 9,225 votes out of more than 3.5 million cast in the race. The slim margin of victory is the third-closest statewide race in Illinois over the last century, according to the Associated Press. An analysis of the official results by the Frerichs campaign confirms a strong showing by the downstate Democrat, particularly in Central Illinois.
The 38 counties belting Central Illinois from Danville to Quincy and from Peoria to Hillsboro generally vote nearly 2-to-1 for Republican candidates. Frerichs, a native of rural Champaign County, appealed to independent voters in the region by focusing on his financial experience and his downstate roots with a promise to invest in the Illinois economy. As a result, Frerichs received 29,168 more votes across the region than Governor Pat Quinn, shrinking Tom Cross’ margin of victory in all but three of the 38 counties. The Central Illinois native also received about 30,000 more votes in Central Illinois in 2014 than Alexi Giannoulias, Pat Quinn or Robin Kelly received in their Democratic statewide bids in 2010.
“Tens of thousands of Rauner-Frerichs independents in Central Illinois were critical to this race, and the decisive role of downstate sends a clear message,” says campaign spokesperson Dave Clarkin. “Independent voters want leaders who are focused on solutions, and they want results. Mike Frerichs pledged to make smart investments that offer a strong return to taxpayers while growing Illinois jobs, and voters responded to the list of reforms he has planned. Now, it is time to get to work.”
OK, please get to work and stop rubbing it in. You won. Move along.
For a list of central Illinois counties where Frerichs did better than expected, click here.
51 Comments
|
FOIA bill stalls out after “firestorm”
Tuesday, Dec 2, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Remember the odd FOIA bill that was blasted by Attorney General Lisa Madigan and government reformers yesterday? Well, it wasn’t moved yesterday and may not be…
The sponsor of the plan, state Rep. Barbara Flynn Currie, a Chicago Democrat, said she filed the plan on behalf of Senate Democrats.
“If they want a discussion, I think we certainly have started one,” Currie said. “Possibly not just a discussion, a firestorm. But we will see where we go from here.”
Currie said she doesn’t know if the plan will move forward this week. Lawmakers aren’t scheduled to be in Springfield again after this week before a new class is to be sworn in next month. Days could be added, though.
* More…
Currie says the proposed changes weren’t actually her idea; rather — it’s a plan pushed by another prominent Democrat, Senate President John Cullerton.
“I think that the ideas came from people who thought that some of the agreements that resulted in the 2009 legislation no longer seem to apply, but I think others disagree,” Currie said of the measure’s origins.
The plan was supposed to be heard by a House committee yesterday, on Mon., Dec. 1. Instead, after a swift backlash, Currie declined to call it.
Still, she hinted of a looming fight over changes to FOIA.
“We’ll see where the conversation begins to take us. There certainly is a lot of opposition,” she said. […]
Cullerton’s office says it’s working with the House to fine-tune the measure this week.
5 Comments
|
Question of the day - Golden Horseshoe Awards
Tuesday, Dec 2, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Our Golden Horseshoe Award for best Statehouse-area bartender goes to Mike at Brown’s…
Mike at Browns deserves a win this year. Often pulling bartender/waiter double duty, he’s always quick and accurate and never forgets what I drink. He’s always willing to engage in friendly conversation, but never forces it or intrudes. Similarly, he’s up for talking shop with us Statehouse people, but is just as happy to talk sports or local gossip and won’t bug you about work unless you bring it up.
Mike is hanging ‘em up this month and he will be sorely missed. He’s a big part of Browns’ atmosphere. It’s not everyone’s favorite, but if you’re looking for a drink or two after work in a quiet place, Browns is the place to be. It won’t be the same without him.
Agreed.
* Our Golden Horseshoe Award for best Statehouse-area waitress goes to someone who isn’t actually a waitress, but how could we pass up this nomination?…
I’d like to nominate a gal that’s not really a waitress, but does basically the same service. I hope you’ll accept this nomination, Rich. Her name is Kim and she works at the Stratton Building Cafeteria. Kim is a great cook when you want something special. She is always helpful even when she’s slammed with orders and the line is long. It’s a thankless job and most people don’t realize how good their food is until they’ve left the area. I would like to nominate her because she is a hard worker and deserves a big THANK YOU and this award! Great job, Kim!
Congrats!
* OK, on to today’s category, with last year’s winners in parentheses…
* Best political bar in Springfield (Boone’s Saloon)
* Best political restaurant in Springfield (Sebastian’s)
As always, intensity counts way more than mere votes. Make your case, please. Thanks!
19 Comments
|
Motion or movement? We’ll know soon enough
Tuesday, Dec 2, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller
* A long-stalled state-run health insurance exchange bill is starting to move in the House…
A House committee in a 9-6 vote Monday approved legislation creating a state-run website as the legislature begins its final week of the fall veto session.
Supporters of creating a state-run website say an impending end-of-year deadline to receive up to $300 million in federal funding plus a coming U.S. Supreme Court decision on tax credits spurred legislative action. Illinois residents currently purchase insurance on the national HealthCare.gov website.
* More…
During Monday’s meeting of the House Human Services Committee, [Rep. Robyn Gabel] turned aside concerns raised by Kristina Rasmussen, an opponent of the bill and spokeswoman for Illinois Policy Action, a wing of the right-leaning Illinois Policy Institute.
Rasmussen said several states running their own exchange have experienced massive technical problems. Gabel and Sarah Myerscough-Mueller, an aide to Quinn, pointed to other states in which enrollment went smoothly.
Rasmussen said creating a state-based exchange “locks us into larger costs down the road.”
Myerscough-Mueller said a state-operated exchange, which would begin enrolling people in fall 2015 for coverage that begins in January 2016, would cost $72.5 million to run during its first year, $57.5 million the second year and about $50 million each year thereafter.
The $270 million in start-up money from the federal government, which requires action by the legislature on a state-based exchange by the end of 2014, would help cover those operating costs and continue a marketing campaign and other outreach efforts, Gabel said.
* It’s paid for with a provider user fee on policies…
The measure that passed a house committee Monday allows for a 3.5 percent assessment on insurance plans to pay for the exchange.
During a house hearing Monday State Representative Norine Hammond asked Representative Robyn Gabel if the three-point-five percent of health insurance costs to pay for the program could rise with the federal rate. Gabel said the law would cap that, but there are ways around expected increased costs.
“So, and there may be some advocates that aren’t thrilled about this, but a big section of the money would go to marketing, so there would just be a little less marketing,” Gabel said.
Gabel says if the cap of 3.5 percent doesn’t generate enough money to run the state-based exchange lawmakers could come back with a new bill to raise more revenue.
20 Comments
|
Off the rails?
Tuesday, Dec 2, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller
* It certainly appears that local preemption on the minimum wage issue is now off the table…
Prior to returning to Springfield for the final scheduled days of the legislature’s fall session, [House Speaker Michael Madigan] dismissed talk that lawmakers — if they act to raise the state wage — would take away Chicago’s ability to do so.
“Without describing what we’re going to do, we would not interfere with what they’re going to do in the city,” Madigan told the Tribune after watching his former top House lawyer get sworn in as an appellate judge. Asked if that meant Chicago would be allowed to have a higher minimum wage rate than the rest of the state, Madigan replied, “Yep.”
Still, Madigan and other House Democrats acknowledged difficulties in coming up with votes needed to hike the state minimum wage rate.
“Well, we’re working on it,” Madigan said.
* Mark Brown has more on that last part…
Nearly 78 percent of those voting last month in state Rep. Mike Zalewski’s suburban legislative district cast ballots in favor of raising the state’s minimum wage to $10 an hour.
But as a minimum wage proposal is considered by the Illinois House this week, Zalewski (D-Riverside) is among many Democratic legislators whose support is far from certain.
Zalewski said he prefers a uniform minimum wage hike across the state, which will become less likely Tuesday if Chicago aldermen, as expected, endorse Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s plans for a $13-an-hour city minimum wage.
Despite two-thirds of Illinois voters endorsing a minimum wage increase, despite Democratic candidates making it a central focus of their 2014 election strategy and despite Democrats holding super-majorities in both legislative chambers, there remains a strong possibility lawmakers this year will leave untouched the state’s $8.25 an hour minimum wage.
For those hard-pressed to understand how that could be, some guidance can be found in the example of Zalewski, who insists he favors a minimum wage increase, too.
“We all want to see a higher minimum wage,” he said.
But Zalewski said he doesn’t see the wisdom of allowing the city of Chicago to have its own separate minimum wage that is higher than the rest of the state.
There’s a whole lot of finger-pointing going on here, but business groups which were willing to accept a $10 statewide minimum wage as long as it preempted Chicago’s ordinance met this morning and decided to work against any minimum wage bill that doesn’t include preemption.
The end result could be a Chicago minimum wage that’s $4.75 an hour higher than anywhere else in the state.
* It’s gonna be a heck of an economics experiment if the state bill fails. The naysayers claim that businesses will move across the street to the suburbs, or close or not expand, while low-paid suburban workers will flock across the border into the city, possibly creating worker shortages or pushing up suburban wages. We’ll find out pretty soon.
25 Comments
|
* From Voices for Illinois Children…
If revenue plummets starting on Jan. 1, 2015, when current income tax rates expire, discretionary portions of Illinois’ general funds budget — over which lawmakers have the most control — would face aggregate cuts of at least 25 percent to balance the state’s budget in fiscal year 2016. And if the annual budgetary savings from the pension law passed last year disappear because the law is struck down by the courts, aggregate cuts to the discretionary parts of the general funds budget would need to be about 33 percent to balance the budget.
In arriving at these estimates, the Fiscal Policy Center methodically went through the state’s general funds budget, estimating resources available in FY 2015 and FY 2016 if the current income tax rates decline, then categorizing state spending as “mandated” or “discretionary,” depending on the degree of authority lawmakers have over the spending. Based on the projected deficits in FY 2016, all discretionary areas of the budget were then cut by an equal percentage until total general funds spending matched available resources.
We considered the following as “mandated” spending areas: those protected by federal law; Medicaid; state statutory contributions to the state-funded retirement systems; statutorily required transfers out of the general funds; debt service; and payments to the State Group Health Insurance Program, the Teachers’ Retirement Insurance Program, and the College Insurance Program. While the General Assembly could decide not to fund some of these areas (as happened for years when the state failed to make its annual pension contributions), doing so would be grossly irresponsible and would either increase the state’s unfunded liabilities or have other extremely harmful consequences such as default or the loss of significant federal matching funds.
We took great care to make conservative assumptions. We considered most spending that is required by state law to be “discretionary,” since the General Assembly could alter that spending requirement by changing or ignoring the underlying statute. We also made conservative assumptions about the timing of repayment of $650 million that the state is borrowing from other funds this year and that must be repaid within 18 months, by assuming the funds are borrowed in the second half of FY 2015 and thus could be repaid as late as FY 2017. We also did not set aside any money in FY 2016 for the state to pay down its nearly $4 billion in unpaid bills. Finally, we considered two special state funds — the Advancement for Education Fund and Commitment to Human Services Fund — as part of the general funds. While both funds are supposed to supplement, not supplant, general funds spending for education and human services, the General Assembly ignored this requirement in FY 2015.
Go read the whole thing.
66 Comments
|
* Dave Dahl…
The Illinois General Assembly is trying to expedite a bill to make Election Day registration permanent as part of a passel of election-related ideas. Another bill would expand early voting for both mail-in and in-person balloting and do away with the term “absentee ballot” in favor of what State Rep. Barbara Flynn Currie (D-Chicago), carrying the bill for House Speaker Mike Madigan (D-Chicago), called “voting.”
The bill, which is still being put together despite it passing committee Monday evening, is moving too fast for some people’s liking.
State Rep. Ed Sullivan (R-Mundelein) quizzed Currie: “It was (Sunday) when the ballots were certified. And yet the day after that we have this omnibus election bill we’re going to push forth without any data analysis of what went right –“
“We know who won,” Currie interrupted. “What else do you need to know?”
* Mike Riopell…
State Rep. Barbara Flynn Currie, a Chicago Democrat, said Election Day registration is already common elsewhere and election authorities haven’t asked lawmakers to do away with it.
“A lot of other states have been there, done that,” Currie said.
The election proposal is lengthy. It even includes a provision that if election officials are providing mementos to some people such as “I Voted” stickers, no one can be denied such a sticker.
The proposal moves to the Illinois House floor for further debate. All Democrats on the panel voted for it and all Republicans voted against it.
39 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
Comments Off
|
Chicago to test police body cams
Monday, Dec 1, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The issue of police body cameras was one of the biggest impediments to revamping Illinois’ unconstitutional eavesdropping law earlier this year. Some cops weren’t thrilled with the idea. But after the Michael Brown shooting, attitudes are changing…
Chicago police Superintendent Garry McCarthy said Monday the department would begin testing body cameras on officers in about 60 days. […]
The cameras — about the size of a pager and typically clipped to the front of a shirt — are intended to capture an officer’s interaction with the public on video and audio, providing potentially critical evidence in any dispute.
The new technology has won early backing from disparate groups that often clash over law enforcement issues — from the American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois and the state NAACP to the union that represents rank-and-file Chicago police officers and the Independent Police Review Authority, which investigates allegations of misconduct by officers.
Proponents hope the cameras will reduce the number of citizen complaints and costly lawsuits about police misconduct while at the same time discouraging citizens from making baseless accusations against officers. The U.S. Justice Department has warned of the scarcity of research on the cameras’ effectiveness, but a widely cited study of body cameras in 2012 by police in Rialto, Calif., a small town about 55 miles east of Los Angeles, found that complaints against its officers plummeted by 88 percent that year while officers’ use of force dropped by 60 percent.
* Rep. Elaine Nekritz may move a bill through the Statehouse next year…
Elaine Nekritz is the chair of the Illinois House Judiciary Committee. She says police and citizen behavior gets better when an interaction is recorded by a camera.
“The real negative side if you want to call it that is the cost and then I think there are some real policy questions as to what kind of interactions can be recorded and who has access to that data.”
* The debate is now down to the details, like when an officer can shut off the camera…
Ed Yohnka, of the American Civil Liberties Union, agreed that determining officer discretion was critical to the fairness of a law on officer body cameras.
“When you get down to it, the question becomes how much discretion are you going to give a police officer for what interactions they record and which ones they don’t,” he said.
Yohnka said officers should have few exceptions on when they should stop recording. They would include risk to public or police safety, at the request of a crime victim or when police talk with confidential sources. Yohkna said police also should be required to set a 90-day time limit on keeping videos.
From the local police perspective, Hartshorn and Lemming said they thought local departments should be trusted with disciplining their officers, and Smoot agreed, saying, “If there is a situation where the officer is not using the tool properly, then departments will have a way to deal with that.”
* And there are other concerns…
“Where is that data stored?” [Nekritz] asks. “How much of it is kept (and) for how long? And then who has access to it? Does the media have access to every interaction?”
16 Comments
|
Reformers blast new FOIA bill
Monday, Dec 1, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Illinois Public Radio…
Illinois residents could have a harder time accessing government information under new legislation before the General Assembly.
The plan, SB2799, makes it harder for people to get repaid legal costs when a government wrongfully denies access to public documents.
At the same time, it makes it easier for governments to keep certain information off-limits.
Groups such as the Better Government Association, the Illinois Press Association (a representative there called the measure the most egregious changes to FOIA since the law was restructured) and the Attorney General’s office are fighting it.
Natalie Bauer, a spokeswoman for the Attorney General, says it will make it incredibly more difficult to obtain public information that taxpayers are owed.
* From Illinois PIRG…
“Transparency in government checks corruption, promotes fiscal responsibility and allows for greater, more meaningful participation in our democratic system,” said Abe Scarr, Director of Illinois PIRG. “This bill moves Illinois in the wrong direction and should be rejected.”
“Democracy is meaningless without a responsible, informed, and active citizenry. In turn, strong public record request laws are essential to inform of the public of government activity,” said Maryam Judar, Executive Director of the Citizen Advocacy Center. “This bill distorts Illinois democracy by limiting people’s access to information about their government activity. The House should not allow this provision to pass.”
The bill makes three significant changes to the state’s Freedom of Information Act.
· When a government official publicly cites a report or study, the entire report is currently subject to public records requests. Under this bill, only the specific section cited would be open to disclosure. This limits the public’s ability to see supporting documentation, methodology, and possibly conflicting findings in a document being cited in government decision making.
· The bill would allow government bodies to withhold documents that are primarily factual so long as they include at least one recommendation.
· The bill would significantly curtail a citizen’s ability to win legal fees from a government body when they violate FOIA. This would significantly limit the public’s ability to hold government bodies accountable when they illegally withhold public documents.
Combined, these changes would significantly limit information accessible to the public and make it easier for government bodies to skirt transparency laws.
The legislation, sponsored by House Majority Leader Barbara Flynn Currie, has been assigned to the totally wired Executive Committee, which meets this afternoon at 4. The underlying shell bill is sponsored by Speaker Madigan.
29 Comments
|
*** UPDATED x1 *** Board certifies results
Monday, Dec 1, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The Illinois State Board of Elections has certified the November results…


So, Rauner holds onto his majority, Topinka is held to under 50 percent and significantly below her 52.6 percent from four years ago, and Frerichs wins by a mere 9,225 votes…
According to the data dating to 1900 reviewed by AP, the 0.261 percentage-point difference makes it a tighter campaign than any other except the 1982 battle for governor and the 1952 race for secretary of state.
* Meanwhile…
The board’s canvass showed first-term Democratic Rep. Kate Cloonen beating Republican challenger Glenn Nixon in the Kankakee area 50.2 percent to 49.8 percent.
Freshman Democratic Rep. Mike Smiddy beat Republican Jim Wozniak in the Quad Cities region 50.5 percent to 49.6 percent.
And Deputy Majority Leader Frank Mautino won a 13th term in north-central Illinois over the GOP’s Jerry Lee Long, 50.5 percent to 49.5 percent.
Those three Democrats won by a grand total of 773 votes.
*** UPDATE *** Oops. Forgot one…
The sole Illinois Supreme Court justice who was on the ballot in last month’s election was sworn in for a second term this morning. Official results released last night by the Illinois State Board of Elections show just how close Supreme Court Justice Lloyd Karmeier was to losing his seat, after an election that saw hefty spending on both sides.
Never has a sitting member of Illinois’ high court lost a bid for retention, but Justice Lloyd Karmeier got close. He earned another ten years on the bench, with a margin of less than one percent (new state board of elections figures show that Karmeier got support from 60.77 percent of voters; he needed 60-percent approval to keep his spot).
Super, super close.
42 Comments
|
Minimum wage politics
Monday, Dec 1, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Crain’s…
Mayor Rahm Emanuel is moving to jump-start his proposal to raise Chicago’s minimum wage to $13 an hour, fearing that the Illinois General Assembly may be about to pre-empt the city’s ability to do so.
The mayor has called a special City Council meeting for Tuesday, Dec. 2, to vote on his proposed ordinance. The council’s Committee on Workforce Development and Audit will consider the plan a day earlier. Approval is expected even though some aldermen are urging an even higher figure of $15 an hour.
“We have decided to proceed [this] week because of the possibility that there may be an attempt to pre-empt the Chicago ordinance,” said Kelley Quinn, the mayor’s spokeswoman. “Taking this step first is the best way to prevent that from happening.”
The move comes as Mr. Emanuel, who has had trouble connecting with some low-income or minority voters, runs for re-election on Feb. 24.
Under the mayor’s proposal, the wage increase would be phased in, starting roughly seven months from now. It would hit $10 an hour by July 1 and $11 within three years. Thereafter, it would go up $1 per year to eventually reach $13 an hour.
* Sun-Times…
City officials hope to pass an ordinance that, in part, mirrors a state bill sponsored by Sen. Kimberly Lightford (D- Maywood).
By 2017, both the city and state would move to $11.
But in Chicago, in 2018, the wage would go up $1 — to end up in 2019 at $13, city officials said.
Lightford said she’s confident her bill will pass in Springfield next week.
But she wasn’t sure Friday what Chicago’s ordinance will mean if her bill passes and is signed by Gov. Pat Quinn.
“I just don’t know if the city can say … we can move ours higher and the state can’t do anything about it,” Lightford said.
* 19th Ward Ald. Matt O’Shea is not happy with the idea…
You don’t need a Nobel Prize in economics to realize a higher minimum wage on the Chicago side of the city limits will drive businesses to the suburbs. A downtown clothing outlet with a captive and affluent customer base might be able to survive employee costs that are 30 to 50 percent higher than a similar store in a far-away suburban mall, but what about a store that operates in a neighborhood on the city’s border? Just like the downtown store, that neighborhood business would have to raise prices to pay its work force a higher Chicago wage. But unlike downtown, the neighborhood store’s customer-base would have plenty of lower-priced options in nearby suburbs, some of which could be reached by literally walking across the street. As such, if we raise the Chicago minimum wage higher than neighboring municipalities, we should be prepared to watch businesses and millions of dollars in tax revenue cross the street, too.
Numbers I’ve seen show that 20 percent of the city’s businesses are clustered around the city’s edges.
* Meanwhile, speaking of hizzoner’s reelection…
Mayor Rahm Emanuel has received $400,000 in political donations that he was able to keep only because the state’s campaign contribution limits were eliminated through the actions of an obscure candidate who threatened to run, but didn’t.
The contribution limits were lifted for everyone in the Chicago mayoral race last month after frequent local candidate William J. Kelly filed paperwork in October showing he gave his own campaign $100,000. Under state law, once a candidate in a local race contributes $100,000 to his or her own campaign within one year of an election, the state contribution caps no longer apply.
But Kelly didn’t file the necessary petition signatures by Monday’s deadline to appear on the ballot. Nonetheless, the lifting of the campaign limits remains in place.
* And…
With City Hall as a backdrop, Cook County Clerk David Orr stood with mayoral contender Jesus “Chuy” Garcia on Sunday and anointed him as the progressive alternative to Mayor Rahm Emanuel and his top-down style.
He “is humble, which is unusual for a politician,” Orr said when he was asked why Garcia — who is also a Cook County commissioner — would be a better mayor than Emanuel. He’s “someone who will listen to people, someone who understands.”
Then Orr tweaked the mayor, who has an enormous fundraising advantage over Garcia but who Chicagoans have expressed dissatisfaction with in public opinion polls.
“The mayor, with millions, has a hard time getting signatures on his petitions. Chuy Garcia in three weeks time, spending no money — all volunteers — got 60-some thousand,” Orr said. “In another week, they probably would have gotten 90,000.”
…Adding… Related…
* Minimum wage poses predicament for service agencies
* Sam Toia: Restaurateurs want Illinois minimum wage increase that’s fair and reasonable
43 Comments
|
* It’s December and you know what that means: Golden Horseshoe Awards month.
For you newbies, the awards have grown from a sorta tongue in cheek end of the year thing into a coveted annual prize. Also, I judge these awards based more on intensity of the nominations than on actual vote counts. If you just nominate somebody without explanation, I’m likely to ignore it. So explain your votes, please.
* As is our custom, we’ll start with “social staff”…
* Best Statehouse-area bartender
* Best Statehouse-area waiter/waitress
Last year’s best bartender was Adam at the No Name Bar. I didn’t receive enough nominations for best waiter/waitress and announced I was discontinuing the category, but let’s try this one more time.
27 Comments
|
Disclosure questions
Monday, Dec 1, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Some commenters pointed this out the other day, and I heard the same thing from some Statehouse types…
Meanwhile, somebody pointed out to me that at makeillinoisgreat.com, which is the website for the transition to the Rauner administration that takes the reins of government on Jan. 12, there’s an interesting combination of actions a visitor can take.
While there is a place to provide ideas, there is also a place to submit a resume, and another to donate to the transition.
Given the difficult history of Illinois, where donations and jobs have sometimes come too close together for comfort, I asked Rauner spokesman Mike Schrimpf about this.
“Personnel decisions aren’t impacted by contributions,” Schrimpf said. As in the case of contributors to the campaign, he said, there will be “no special favors. Period.”
“We didn’t want taxpayers to have to foot the bill for the transition and believe disclosing contributors will provide the sunshine necessary for taxpayers to feel confident in the process.”
Neither “Make Illinois Great” nor “Bruce Rauner Transition Committee” is a registered political action committee, so we won’t know if somebody contributed and later got a job unless Rauner publicly discloses all of his contributions.
* While I highly doubt that we’re looking at a potential money-changing situation here, in the interest of transparency, Rauner probably ought to consider disclosing everything.
Then again, I can also see the other side. If Rauner does disclose those contributions and a highly qualified person gets a state job after contributing to the committee, that person will undoubted be smeared by the media’s broad brush.
So, perhaps a rethink may be in order here.
…Adding… From Mike Schrimpf…
Our November 5 press release about the transition said that we’d be disclosing contributions.
12 Comments
|
Today’s number: 93 percent
Monday, Dec 1, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Sun-Times…
A 2011 study by the Illinois Latino Policy Forum shows that 93 percent of the city’s Latino population under age 18 are U.S. citizens.
“This means that as this large young demographic comes of age, the proportion of Latinos eligible to vote will increase significantly — as will their share of the electorate and ability to affect the outcomes of elections,” the study says.
15 Comments
|
I think something just froze over
Monday, Dec 1, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From a January 5, 2014 Bloomington Pantagraph editorial…
Fundamentally, Quinn’s approach rests on the assumption that the state has a revenue problem. But that’s not the case. The state’s biggest financial problem is a lack of spending discipline.
There is no reason to give the state additional revenue, and Quinn’s approach ignores the fact that taxpayers are already paying more.
The governor needs to understand that adding taxes — no matter how popular it may sound — is a failed strategy.
* From a June 1 Bloomington Pantagraph editorial…
We have heard many of the Democrats say consistently that it’s impossible to cut the budget enough to make up for the lower tax revenues caused by rolling back the tax rates. But then we get another story, like the one by Springfield Bureau Chief Kurt Erickson, that millions of dollars have been spent in Medicaid payments to dead people. The savings are there; the General Assembly just needs to look for them.
OK, those were not payments to dead people. Those were payments to providers, but whatever. That’s not the point here.
* From the Bloomington Pantagraph’s endorsement of Bruce Rauner…
But the job-killing income tax and an anti-business sentiment that prevails in state government has harmed the state’s economy.
* Guess what happened after their guy won the governor’s race? From a November 30, 2014 Pantagraph editorial…
For the short term, reductions in spending and increases in revenues are the only practical solutions to the state’s budget problems.
All emphasis added for obvious reasons.
57 Comments
|
Biss, Kamis, Patel named to “40 under 40″
Monday, Dec 1, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller
* A couple of state politics types were named to Crain’s Chicago Business’ annual “40 under 40″ list. Sen. Daniel Biss…
If it’s complicated and controversial, Sen. Daniel Biss is likely in the middle of it. As a Democratic freshman state senator from the North Shore, he jumped to co-sponsor gay marriage legislation and use his Ph.D. in math from MIT to help craft pension reform law. “Daniel is just scary-smart—I don’t know any other way to put it,” says Rep. Elaine Nekritz, D-Northbrook, who chairs the House Pension Committee. “He’s the idea guy.”
Before becoming the state Legislature’s resident policy wonk, Biss was an algebraic topologist who taught math at the University of Chicago. Now he’s crunching the numbers behind such ideas as automatic enrollment in retirement savings plans at companies without pension benefits. A bipartisan bill to this effect has riled up the insurance industry, which fears it would drive down fees, he says.
Still, don’t pigeonhole him as a numbers guy. “I don’t want that to be all I do,” says the father of two, a skilled juggler who occasionally flips lit torches for his kids’ amusement in his Evanston backyard. He recently ushered into law two bills—one that cracks down on patent trolls, another that allows townships to consolidate. Running unopposed for re-election this year, Biss admits to toying with the idea of seeking higher office. Says Nekritz: His future “is whatever he wants.”
* And John Kamis…
The power of belief was instilled early in John Kamis, whose mother, Eiline, once was a nun (and died when he was 5). For his part, Kamis has faith that Illinois government can be saved. And his instrument, Innovation Illinois, a nascent left-of-center advocacy group, aims to convert such beliefs into action by mining voter sentiment and using it to sway rank-and-file state legislators on issues such as gay marriage, despite the General Assembly’s oligarchic reputation. “He’s selling ideas, not charisma,” says Christopher Kennedy, who chairs the group.
So far, Kamis, a partner at Chicago-based Carpenter Lipps & Leland who ran Gov. Pat Quinn’s 2010 primary campaign, has raked in $100,000 for the group, which inevitably will be seen as a counterforce to the right-of-center Illinois Policy Institute. Not quite so, says Kamis, who as a Quinn adviser oversaw Budgeting for Results, a work-in-progress seeking to measure government output. To which Kennedy, chairman of the University of Illinois board of trustees, says amen: “Innovation Illinois needs to stand on its own—not simply be against somebody else.” Kamis, he adds, “has a capacity to be an honest broker.”
* Also definitely worth mentioning, Amisha Petel…
Patel became an activist and, since 2007, the executive director of the Grassroots Collaborative, a powerful coalition of labor and community groups. Small but mighty, the nonprofit—which had a $319,000 budget in 2013—aims to connect the dots of wages, violence, poverty and affordable housing.
An early coup was the 2006 Big Box Living Wage Ordinance, which required retailers like Wal-Mart to pay Chicago workers $9.25 an hour. A few years later, Patel and her group spotlighted the mayor’s property tax kitty, tax-increment financing, and helped force the Chicago Mercantile Exchange to relinquish $15 million in TIF subsidies back to city coffers. United Airlines followed suit, returning $1.5 million of its own TIF funds.
Patel’s campaign ultimately spurred a policy shift: Now TIF districts with a balance of more than $1 million must release at least a quarter of available funds back to the city and schools.
While her work involves many people, Patel’s influence is distinct, say those who know her. Through the Grassroots Collaborative, she has “laid the foundation for this moment,” says Jackson Potter, staff coordinator at the Chicago Teachers Union. That moment: making 2015 the year of securing better wages for hardworking Chicagoans.
Congrats to all. The full list is here.
* Also, a heads up, we’ll start taking nominations later today for our annual “Golden Horsehoe” awards.
28 Comments
|
Indiana booster resorts to red-baiting
Monday, Dec 1, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Allan Katz unfavorably compared Illinois to Indiana in the Northwest Indiana Times…
British Prime Minister Margret Thatcher said, “The trouble with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people’s money.” That’s what happened in Illinois. The voters know it, and the election of Rauner is a grassroots storming of the gates of Springfield.
Socialism? Really?
* It just so happens that TheStreet.com published a new study over the holiday weekend…
Socialism at its core is a political term applied to an economic system in which individual property, like money, is held and used in common, within a state or a country as an attempt to equalize the standard of living for the average citizen. […]
But if America is really turning into a more socialist country, then where can we see evidence of this happening? Are any states becoming socialist before our eyes? And if so, how do we define the most socialist state, you ask?
In order to measure the degree to which different states reflect socialist principles, we determined state expenditures and state GDP as the best indicators because socialist states tax and spend a higher percentage of their GDP. We used data on the total state expenditures for fiscal year 2013 from the most recent National Association of State Budget Officers report and pulled 2013 gross domestic product by state data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis.
The math? Simple. The FY2013 state expenditure divided by the state’s 2013 GDP.
* Illinois comes in as the 10th least Socialist state in America…
Total State Expenditures (FY 2013): $66.4 Billion
Gross Domestic Product (2013): $671.4 Billion
Expenditures as Proportion of GDP: 9.90%
* Indiana comes in as the 7th least Socialist state…
Total State Expenditures (FY 2013): $27.8 Billion
Gross Domestic Product (2013): $294.2 Billion
Expenditures as Proportion of GDP: 9.44%
Barely a difference there.
33 Comments
|
Out with the old, in with the new
Monday, Dec 1, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller
* My Crain’s Chicago Business column…
Democrat Rod Blagojevich was elected governor a dozen years ago on promises of a fresh start, tough reforms and change. After 26 years of Republican rule, the voters bought into the populist message.
In his re-election campaign, Blagojevich portrayed his Republican opponent, Judy Baar Topinka, as a longtime insider and trounced her by 10 points. The only thing that truly changed, however, was that the governor and the General Assembly constantly bickered, to the exclusion of progress. His impeachment was a relief.
Blagojevich, like his successor, Gov. Pat Quinn, didn’t come from the Democratic Party’s “governing wing.” They were both outsider rock-throwers. Quinn attempted to govern but didn’t do it well and eventually became identified as leader of the status quo. So the rock-thrower who never totally got his arms around the job was viewed by voters as being too much of an insider.
Out with the old rock-thrower, in with a new and improved rock-thrower: Bruce Rauner.
Click here to read the rest before commenting, please. Thanks.
28 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
* My most sincere condolences to Leader Durkin. From the Tribune…
Thomas J. Durkin, age 84 of Westchester. US Army Veteran Korean War. Beloved husband of the late Colette A. Durkin, nee McHugh. Loving father of the Honorable Thomas (Gail Fundakowski) Durkin, Kevin (Kathy), Terry (Patricia), Michael (Julie), Patrick (Mary), The Honorable James (Celeste), Robert (Laura) and William (Erin) Durkin. Proud grandfather of Chris (Christine), Colin (Meagan Bridges), Connor (Lindsay), Jess, Katie, Mike, Kristy, Mackenzie, Tommy, Billy, Michelle, Matthew, Kimberly, Kelly, Sean, Brian, Colleen, Adrienne, Madeline, Emma, Caroline, Jane, Patrick, Maggie, Jack, Molly and Joey Durkin. Dear brother of the late John “Jack” (Dorothy) Durkin and the late Catherine (late Philip) Raleigh. Fond uncle to many. Life Trustee of John Marshall Law School and Fenwick High School.
Funeral Wednesday, December 3, 2014 at 9am from Russo’s Hillside Chapels, 4500 Roosevelt Road, Hillside, IL 60162 (between Mannheim and Wolf Roads) to Divine Infant Church for 10am Mass.
Interment Queen of Heaven Cemetery.
Visitation Tuesday, December 2, 2014 from 3 to 9pm.
In lieu of flowers memorials to Mercy Home (www.mercyhome.org), Misericordia (www.misericordia.com) or Catholic Charities Chicago (www.catholiccharities.net) appreciated. For additional info (708) 449-5300. Please visit Thomas’ personal tribute website at www.russohillsidechapels.com and sign the guestbook.
[Comments now open.]
4 Comments
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
|
Hosted by MCS
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax
Advertise Here
Mobile Version
Contact Rich Miller
|