Pot, meet kettle
Monday, Dec 9, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Illinois Review…
State Senator Kirk Dillard is getting heat from the Champion News blog over contributions he and his senate campaign made to Barack Obama’s 2009 inauguration committee. Dillard, as well as several other Republican federal and state lawmakers, joined the January 2009 DC celebration and attended the Illinois State Society’s exclusive inaugural ball. Those expenses show up on Dillard’s filings with the Illinois State Board of Elections.
Champion News, which is owned by Jack Roeser (who serves on Bruce Rauner’s campaign committee), argues the recorded inauguration expenses contradict Dillard’s assertion that he never contributed to Barack Obama’s presidential campaign.
And check out the Rauner campaign’s react…
Rauner contributed to how many Democrats over the years? He made Rahm Emanuel how many millions? He helped devise a scheme to get how much campaign money to Speaker Madigan’s candidates through Stand for Children’s Illinois PAC?
And now he’s mocking Dillard for contributing a few hundred bucks to the presidential inauguration committee? Last I checked, Obama was every American’s President.
Sheesh.
49 Comments
|
Sen. Kirk has surgery
Monday, Dec 9, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From a press release…
The office of U.S. Senator Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) today released the following statement:
“Saturday morning Senator Mark Kirk went to Northwestern Lake Forest Hospital with stomach pains. Doctors determined that, due to the fact that he had gall stones, his gall bladder needed to be removed. This morning Senator Kirk underwent a successful surgery to have his gall bladder removed and is resting comfortably. His doctor expects a quick recovery.”
11 Comments
|
Rauner unveils several new short ads
Monday, Dec 9, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Bruce Rauner’s campaign has a new Christmas themed ad called Snow Globe…
* Rauner has released several more 15-second ads. From his campaign…
Bruce Rauner today launched a new interactive, multimedia ad campaign across television, mobile and digital platforms, including Facebook and Twitter. The effort builds on Bruce’s theme of hammering the special interests running state government and engages Illinoisans ready to shake up Springfield.
The campaign’s website, HammerAndShake.com, features seven :15 videos. In the first phase of the campaign, two of the videos are running in heavy rotation on television as well as receiving substantial digital promotion. Illinoisans are asked to vote on which video should be the next to go on TV.
The campaign is also being heavily promoted on social media.
* They’re all pretty clever. Hammer…
* Lunch…
* Light…
* Table…
* Boom…
* Shake…
70 Comments
|
It’s not a reception, but bring a toy!
Monday, Dec 9, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The Illinois Chamber, Illinois Bankers Association and the Chicagoland Chamber are holding a fundraiser for a couple of state legislators next week. From their e-mail…
Wednesday, December 18, 2013
2:30 pm to 4:00 pm
**or immediately after Rich Miller’s Annual Lunch Reception**
I’m already starting to get questions about my “reception.”
* Just to be clear, I’m not having a “reception.” I’m giving a speech to the City Club of Chicago, and it has nothing to do with that biz fundraiser, which will be in a different part of Maggiano’s.
The speech sold out a long time ago, but I think there may be a few seats available. Call Paul Green, or click here to get on the waiting list.
* The occasion is the City Club’s second annual “Christmas with Rich Miller.” This time around, we’re asking people to bring toys and/or gift cards to the event. The toys should be appropriate for children ages 3-5. If you bring a gift card, please make sure the store is child appropriate.
The toys and gift cards will be donated to Lutheran Social Services of Illinois’ early childhood program. The group serves families in poor areas of Chicago.
From LSSI…
LSSI’s mission is to create a stimulating learning environment that promotes social competency and school readiness for preschool age children who are academically and economically at risk. Their goal is to strive for excellence at every opportunity and at all times by empowering, strengthening and supporting families. The development of meaningful and resourceful community partnerships assist in providing quality services for children.
* So, please bring a toy with you next Wednesday. And if you can’t make it, you can click here to donate to Lutheran Social Services of Illinois. Thanks!
And, yes, I’ll be reminding you of this again before the event, so you might as well donate today and get it over with.
5 Comments
|
Rich Williamson
Monday, Dec 9, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From an e-mail…
I am very sorry to let you know that our friend and [GOP] National Committeeman, Rich Williamson, passed away yesterday. As you all know, Rich loved his family, his country, and his party, and we will miss his wisdom and wit.
I am told the tentative details of the arrangements are: visitation on Friday from 3:00pm – 7:00pm at Scott Funeral Home in Wilmette, and the funeral will be held on Saturday at 2:00pm in Kenilworth. More details will be forthcoming.
…Adding… Press release…
Illinois GOP Mourns Rich Williamson (1949-2013)
CHICAGO – The Illinois Republican Party is mourning the passing of Rich Williamson, the Republican National Committeeman for the Illinois GOP since 2010. Williamson served as chairman of the party from 1999-2001, served three presidents in senior Foreign Service roles, and was the Republican nominee for U.S. Senate in 1992.
Illinois Republican Party Chairman Jack Dorgan urged all Illinoisans to keep Williamson’s wife and children in their thoughts and prayers.
“Rich was a true friend, and a great diplomat,” Dorgan said. “He loved his family, loved his country, and loved this party.”
The Illinois Republican Party will announce additional details regarding arrangements when they become available.
8 Comments
|
Question of the day
Monday, Dec 9, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The Tribune takes a look at the impact of the temporary tax increase sunset 13 months from now…
At the end of next year, what was billed as a temporary income tax hike will by law drop to 3.75 percent unless lawmakers and the governor decide to continue it.
Oddly, the income tax would be cut in the middle of the state’s budget year. That gives planners a bit of a cushion, though the expiration of the tax hike still is estimated to take $2.2 billion out of state coffers for the final six months of the budget year that starts July 1. […]
The should-it-stay-or-should-it-go tax hike question is likely to be a big issue in the race for governor. The fate of the tax hike will have a major impact on whoever is sitting in the governor’s office come 2015. That’s supposed to be the first full year of a lowered income tax and legislative budget forecasters predict a $4.8 billion loss in revenue. It’s a tough number for even the biggest budget cutter to hit.
The politicians in Springfield have a few paths: Pass a half-year budget. Stick money in lump sums rather than line items so dollars are harder to track. Tell voters the candidate for governor who wins the November election should get to shape his budget. Delay payment of more bills and so forth.
Maybe even “all of the above.”
* The Question: If a Republican is elected governor next year, what do you think he’ll do about the tax hike sunset? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please.
survey tools
39 Comments
|
Today’s numbers
Monday, Dec 9, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Bloomberg has an interesting piece about last week’s pension reform bill vote which focuses on opposition by southern Illinois Republicans…
“I wasn’t going to ask them to walk the plank politically,” [House Republican Leader Jim Durkin] said. “I erased them from the equation. They have a lot of Republican union members down in those districts.”
Thirty-three of those 54 counties south of Interstate 72 lost population in the last census. In some legislative districts in the region, government jobs represent 20 percent of the employment, according to Rob Paral and Associates, a Chicago-based research group that analyzes census data.
“In some of those districts, the state is the major employer,” Durkin said. “That’s part of the problem.”
In the region, 50 of the counties went for Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney in the 2012 election.
Illinois isn’t unique in this regard. In fact, counties with higher proportions of local and state government workers as a share of their total workforce skewed toward Romney last year, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data compiled by Bloomberg show.
Among the roughly nine in 10 counties where data was available, local and state workers represented 14.2 percent of workers on average. Romney won 81 percent of the counties above that level.
* And here’s a related and very interesting nugget from Greg Hinz…
I think Mr. Rauner’s would-be peers in Springfield learned something about his style last week—particularly when, after pretty much accusing the GOP leadership of selling out to unions with “an insider deal crafted behind closed doors,” he showed up at Mr. Durkin’s fundraiser as if nothing had happened. Just bidness, I guess.
* Related…
* Pension reform solution further complicates University faculty recruitment and retention
* Unions may leave Quinn, other pols off donation list after pension vote
* Unions Boxed Into Corner on Pension Reform Vote
* GOP, Dems now face pension vote fallout in 2014
* Tom Cross: Why I voted against pension reform bill
* Erickson: Different perspectives on pension reform votes
* Finke: Illinois pension reform ain’t over yet
* Brady pleased with media reaction to his pension reform vote
19 Comments
|
Absolutely beyond the pale
Monday, Dec 9, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* We all know that newspaper comment sections are often vile cesspools of hatred and bigotry. But check out this letter to the editor regarding gay marriage which was actually published by the Champaign News-Gazette…
If it were known that these lawmakers would be the ones who would have turned homosexual-marriage into law, they probably would’ve been drowned at birth.
PAUL MASON HAYES
Urbana
The News-Gazette’s contact info is here, just in case you wanna let them know how you feel about their decision to publish that monstrosity.
47 Comments
|
* Since many corporations pay little to no state taxes, a growing number are asking for EDGE credits, which allows the companies to pocket state withholding taxes. But that requires legislation for each deal, and that means legislators are put on the spot. So, at least one state legislator thinks the executive branch ought to be given the authority…
Sen. Thomas Cullerton, a Democrat from Villa Park, said the process needs to be made “more palatable” for corporations by ending the practice of executives publicly testifying on why they need the money. One possibility might be to give the department the authority to decide which companies can keep employee taxes if the companies have little or no state tax liability.
Chris Mooney, director of the Institute of Government and Public Affairs at the University of Illinois, said “corporate big shots” are not used to being peppered with questions when seeking tax breaks. “They are not happy about that,” Mooney said. “It’s sort of embarrassing for them.”
* The problem with Sen. Cullerton’s idea is the state’s economic development agency loves EDGE credits, while another agency says there’s no proof that they work overall…
“We have calculated that EDGE, over its history, has produced $8 in private investment for every $1 in credit,” [Dave Roeder, a spokesman with the Department of Commerce] said.
The state has pledged nearly $800 million in EDGE incentives since it was created in 1999.
A 2009 report by the Department of Revenue found that there is no reliable way to measure the impact of the tax incentives program on employment because it is unclear what the net effect of favoring certain firms and industries over others has been on the longer-term employment prospects of Illinois.
What do you think?
21 Comments
|
More Golden Horseshoes
Monday, Dec 9, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The winner of the Beth Hamilton Golden Horseshoe Award for Best House Secretary/Admin. Assistant is Jody Aiello…
Jody Aiello assistant for Greg Harris and Michelle Mussman. Somehow Jody keeps everthing running and Rep. Harris where he needs to be.
Last session she had her hands full with the Marriage Bill along with calls from people opposing closures and budget related meetings, appropriation hearings and meetings. I don’t think she has ever had a bad day, at least she never shows it if she does.
She defines multi-tasking and does it with a smile on her face while under pressure from tons of lobbyist and advocates wanting a meeting with Rep. Harris. She is a true pro and a pleasure to work with.
I wouldn’t have wanted her job this year. Can you imagine the phone calls she got? Oy.
* Runner-up is Kristin Milligan…
Quite simply, she’s the best, Kristin’s always helpful to the throng of people hanging out in 314. She’s hard-working, loyal and goes above & beyond for her members.
* The winner of the Golden Horseshoe Award for Best Senate Secretary/Admin. Assistant is Anita Colvin-Barth…
She works her tail off to keep up with one of the most notoriously difficult members, Kotowski, and she does it without so much as a peep. Plus, I’m pretty sure she has the record for fastest stair climb from 1-M to the floor.
* Runner-up is Abby Walsh…
Abby Walsh is one of the hardest working assistants, covering both Brady’s Bloomington and Springfield offices. She maintains a pleasant attitude even when things get crazy, and always greets everyone she encounters with a smile. To top it off, she’s very stylish!
* And this is also worth remembering…
I know Rich wants names, but this has been an unusual year and ALL of the legislative secretaries deserve some credit. Anyone within earshot of a legislative office knows the phones have been ringing off the hook most of the year. First gay marriage, then the concealed carry bill, then gay marriage again, then pensions, then gay marriage again, then pensions, etc. The legislative secretaries have been brutalized by many of the people calling because they are the first line of defense against the crazies. They put up with a tremendous amount of crap from many of the people who call (constituents don’t usually call to say “thank you”).
Agreed.
* The Golden Horseshoe Award for best bartender goes to Adam at No Name Bar…
Most importantly, he pours a good drink. But on top of that, he’s good company (knows when to engage, when to ignore), he knows a ton about a ton, and he always keeps the popcorn machine running.
* Our runner-up received just one nomination, but how could I ignore this?…
The best bartender is Louie at Gab’s. The guy is like 75 years old, still there 2 - 3 days a week. If you have a questions about local politics, he has the answer. If you have a question about the old ‘mob’ and he isn’t under some ‘non-disclosure’ agreement, then he will give you the answer. If you want to know what any old timer drinks, he has the answer. He doesn’t know state politics as well as some of the others here but that is why you can catch the Trib people there eating pizza and boozing.
* We didn’t get enough nominations for best waiter/waitress, so I’m gonna discontinue that category. There wasn’t a ton of interest last year, either.
* The Golden Horseshoe Award for best bar goes to Boone’s Saloon…
It’s a great place to hang out after dinner, because you’ll find plenty of Statehouse types. I had one of the more memorable experiences of my entire career there Tuesday night. A fascinating evening, which makes this vote pretty easy.
* Runner-up is the Globe…
The best bar is still the Globe, especially now that it’s back in its former space and freshly renovated. So many legislators and lobbyists stay at either the Hilton or Lincoln, the Globe is the nicest, most upscale and conveniently located bar downtown. No chance of a DUI when you leave, since you’re either taking the elevator or walking across the street to get home. There are always lots of important people there and the set up lends itself to some quiet conversations and discretion.
Congrats to all our winners.
* OK, now let’s turn to today’s categories…
* Best State Senate Staffer - Non Political
* Best State House Staffer - Non Political
As always, this is about intensity far more than the number of votes a nominee receives. So, please, make extra sure to explain your vote or it could be disregarded. Thanks!
49 Comments
|
A takeover bid
Monday, Dec 9, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* My weekly syndicated newspaper column…
By now, it should be self evident that Bruce Rauner has locked up pretty much all the big money in the Republican primary race for governor. Last week’s pension reform vote provides even more evidence.
Rauner has built an impenetrable fortress of high-dollar campaign contributors. Ron Gidwitz, long known in GOP circles for being the gateway to bigtime cash from the wealthy, has fully joined in, as has the richest man in Illinois Ken Griffin.
Gidwitz was with Sen. Kirk Dillard in the 2010 gubernatorial primary, but Gidwitz and Rauner have sucked up so many dollars - including over $250,000 from campaign fundraising committee member Griffin and lots more from Griffin’s friends - that Dillard hasn’t been able to raise any cash from rich people he’s known for years, even decades. Dillard’s financial predicament has become so desperate that he voted against last week’s pension reform bill in the obvious hope that he can now raise some dough from public employee unions.
Dillard’s vote is even more bizarre when you realize that he voted against a union-negotiated pension bill back in May and twice voted in favor of House Speaker Michael Madigan’s pension reform bill in May and June. He really had no choice last week. It was sink or swim time. Whether a gubernatorial candidate can win a 2014 Republican primary with union backing remains to be seen, but it appears highly unlikely from this vantage point. If Dillard does win any public worker union endorsements, Rauner can then whack him with a “pay to play” charge and beat him over the head for taking “big government union boss” dollars.
The same goes for Treasurer Dan Rutherford. The treasurer isn’t facing a gubernatorial campaign cash crisis like Dillard, but he hasn’t been able to raise the big bucks to compete with Rauner, who is reporting new six figure contributions almost every day. Rutherford said not long ago that a pension reform bill should be passed so that its constitutionality could be litigated in the courts. Last week, Rutherford sided with the unions and said that he opposed the bill because he believed it to be unconstitutional.
For three solid years, state Rep. Tom Cross constantly insisted to his caucus that pension reform absolutely had to be passed, even though the majority of his members sided with the unions. That split eventually became so bitterly intense that Cross could no longer effectively continue as House Republican Leader.
Yet, when push came to shove, Cross voted “No.”
Huh?
Well, he could’ve gone for the easy newspaper endorsements and the “regular” Statehouse money, but Cross knows that his best fundraising year as House GOP Leader came in 2010 - when Ken Griffin and his independently wealthy wife Ann contributed huge dollars to his cause and helped him raise even more money from their super-rich friends.
A “Yes” vote could’ve meant no Griffin cash for Cross (Griffin penned a recent Chicago Tribune op-ed slamming the pension bill with Rauner campaign talking points and his wife reportedly made several phone calls to House Republicans last week). So, Cross went with the money.
US Sen. Mark Kirk has been courting the Griffin’s and their bank accounts for several years. One of Kirk’s top political guys is now working for Rauner. So, in retrospect, Sen. Kirk’s aggressive statement opposing the pension bill last week should’ve been no surprise. But it sure as heck freaked out a lot of legislative Republicans, particularly in the House. Twenty-two House Republicans voted for Speaker Madigan’s pension bill in May, but just 15 voted for a similar bill last week that had been negotiated by their own newly elected Leader, Rep. Jim Durkin. Sen. Kirk’s opposition was crucial to that precipitous decline.
Speaker Madigan claimed last week that Rauner had made a “political mistake” when he tried and failed to “blow up” the process and kill the pension bill.
Governmentally, Rauner’s behavior was appalling. It showed that he would be a needlessly confrontational and even irresponsible governor. But this was no political loss. Instead, it officially heralded a new era in GOP politics.
Ken Griffin told the Tribune last year that the ultra wealthy “actually have an insufficient influence” on politics. And now, Griffin, Rauner and the rest of the ultra-wealthy are making a big play to take over the party and then the governor’s mansion. Everybody else had better pay attention.
Thoughts?
28 Comments
|
* My Sun-Times column…
We’re about to find out just what sort of state we really live in.
Actually, we already pretty much know.
Going back as far as the 1940s, Illinois has neglected to fully fund its public employee pension plans.
The problem eventually got so bad the state’s Constitutional Convention delegates inserted an air-tight guarantee that pension benefits could never be “diminished or impaired.” The brand new Constitution was approved by voters in 1970. Illinoisans were officially informed that the pension clause was “self explanatory.”
The idea was to scare legislators and the governor into fully funding the pension systems and prevent them from expanding already unaffordable benefits.
The Constitutional Convention delegates wanted to specifically warn the state’s powers that be that they’d never be able to one day turn around and decide that not enough was paid into the funds and too much was promised out of the funds, so benefits had to be cut.
It didn’t work.
At all.
The pension funds were never given enough state money. Benefits were expanded almost every year, sometimes more than once.
And then just last week the General Assembly approved and the governor signed into law a bill that did exactly what the Constitutional Convention delegates specifically tried to prevent. They reduced unaffordable, unfunded pension benefits.
Things finally got to the point where taxpayers were on the hook for $380 billion in pension fund payments over the next 30 years. The pension systems’ unfunded liability had grown to $100 billion.
Our legislators and governors had some partners in this debacle. Unions pushed hard for some very big benefit hikes, including a compounded annual 3 percent increase for all retirees that has wound up costing a fortune. If the unions had pushed half as hard to actually fund those benefit sweeteners, things might be different today.
The new law slashes benefits, particularly that annual cost-of-living adjustment. A Sun-Times editorial described it this way: “The bill kicks ordinary working people — secretaries, clerks, teachers and the like — in the teeth.”
Unbelievably, there are those who think the new law doesn’t go nearly far enough. Republican gubernatorial candidate Bruce Rauner said the law merely slaps “a small bandage on an open wound.”
Rauner would go further. He’d freeze all pension benefits where they are today. No cost-of-living adjustments ever. So, if your retirement income is now $30,000, it’ll be $30,000 15 years from now, regardless of inflation.
Rauner would also put all current workers into 401(k) plans — the same plans that most private employees participate in, and the same plans that many are now worried are so inadequate that we appear heading for a national poverty disaster among the elderly.
Rauner tried to kill the bill last week. The man who reported making $53 million last year tried his cynical best to incite class warfare and turn the less fortunate against the bad public employees and retirees. His ploy didn’t work. The bill was already so harsh that few were willing to go any further.
The court cases will begin soon, and that’s when we will discover what sort of state this is.
We’re going to soon see whether a plain language constitutional provision is enough to stop exactly the outcome that the drafters were specifically trying to prevent two score and three years ago.
I can see how some of this new might survive. There is some wiggle room, particularly on cost of living adjustments. The constitutional drafters debated whether to specifically protect benefits against the ravages of inflation and decided against it. But it couldn’t be more clear what those drafters were trying to do, and the new law sure looks a lot like it.
Discuss.
102 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
Reader comments closed for the weekend
Friday, Dec 6, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Back in January of 1985, as part of a university class project, my best friend Brian Monahan and I started an anti-apartheid organization that attempted to educate people about South Africa and push for divestment.
Shortly after, the South African issue exploded across the country. We found ourselves right in the middle of one of the most important issues of our time, and the first real “cause” taken up by our own generation. Freeing Nelson Mandela looked impossible back then, but putting pressure on that disgusting government consumed many of us.
So you can imagine the delight of everyone who worked for a free South Africa when Steven Van Zandt and his friends released this song later that year…
It’s time for some justice it’s time for the truth
* And this one is in Brian’s memory. His favorite song about South Africa…
Well I hate it when the blood starts flowin’
but I’m glad to see resistance growin’
Comments Off
|
Moody’s likes the new pension law
Friday, Dec 6, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* For Bruce Rauner, the Wall St. Journal editorial page, the Illinois Policy Institute and everybody else who’s been loudly complaining that the pension reform bill doesn’t spill enough blood on the floor, Moody’s has some news for you…
* From the rating agency itself…
Illinois Pension Reform Legislation Is Credit Positive
Illinois Governor Pat Quinn yesterday signed a bill (Senate Bill 1) that, according to legislative documents, reduces the state’s unfunded pension liability by about 20%, a credit positive for Illinois (A3, negative), the lowest-rated US state.
The reforms face a legal challenge from organized labor but, if implemented, we believe they will substantially ease the pension funding pressure that has helped trigger five Illinois downgrades since early 2009.
Illinois’ unfunded pension liabilities – which totaled $100 billion in June 2013 on an as-reported basis, or $173 billion according to Moody’s adjusted net pension liability calculation – are the largest of any US state.
The state General Assembly’s passing of SB 1 on December 3 ended a multi-year impasse over how to reverse severe deterioration in the state’s pension funds.
Formal actuarial data on reforms’ effects still to be evaluated
We have yet to receive formal actuarial data detailing SB 1’s effects on accrued pension liabilities and future state contribution requirements, but we will evaluate them, when available. The preliminary estimates disclosed by the state legislature say the reforms will lower contributions during the next 30 years by $160 billion in nominal terms, to $214 billion, while putting the state pensions on a path to full funding over a closed, 30-year period. The state expects to reduce its contribution in the first year after implementation by $1.2 billion, or 20%, according to the legislative figures. The savings come from reforms affecting current members of the State Employees’ Retirement System (SERS), the State Teachers’ Retirement System (STRS), the State Universities Retirement System (SURS) and the General Assembly Retirement System (GARS), which account for the bulk of the state’s unfunded pension liability. SB 1’s reforms do not apply to the fifth statewide plan, for judges.
Supplemental contributions may help state reach full funding faster
Including the impact of supplemental funds provided for in the law, the legislature expects the public pensions to reach fully-funded status in about 25 years. Prior governing statute, by contrast, required annual state contributions based on a goal of achieving an actuarial assets-to- liability (“funded”) ratio of 90% over 50 years. Supplemental contributions would be derived from two sources: 10% of savings from cost of living adjustment (COLA) and other pension plan changes and the revenue currently being used to provide debt service on two pension funding bonds issued in 2010 and 2011. The last of those bonds mature during fiscal 2019, when debt service requirements total $900 million. These supplemental funds, which will total more than $1 billion annually starting in fiscal 2020, would be deposited into the Pension Stabilization Fund in the state treasury and transferred monthly to the systems. These supplemental payments will not be used to reduce the state’s base contributions, which under SB 1 must be enough to achieve full amortization of unfunded liabilities over a 30-year period.
10 Comments
|
* University of Illinois President Robert Easter sent a “Dear colleague” e-mail this week outlining a possible new supplemental retirement program for university employees…
The changes made to reduce the cost of the pension systems to the state and fully fund them within 30 years falls, to a large extent, on employees and retirees, including those of us at the University of Illinois. We are keenly aware of the negative impact of these changes for all of us in the university community and are committed to maintaining a competitive retirement program.
To this end we are exploring potential options including a supplemental retirement plan offered by the University. We expect to be able to provide additional information in time for the Board of Trustees meeting in January.
* Meanwhile, let’s take a look at some other pension-related stuff. Bruce Rauner tweeted this after the governor signed the pension bill into law…
* Naperville Sun…
Did [Sen. Linda Holmes], a Democrat, believe that politics were at play to give Democrat Quinn a re-election bump?
“On the political end, I think this was done to give the governor a win,” she said. “And I don’t think that’s worth forsaking benefits for anybody.”
* Treasurer Dan Rutherford opposed the bill on constitutional grounds. The impact on Rutherford’s pocketbook is significant, however…
The Republican from Chenoa said he has not taken the time to calculate the effects of the landmark legislation on his own pocketbook.
“I’ve been busy looking at the constitutionality of it,” Rutherford said.
But, according to a database created by the Center for Tax and Budget Accountability, Rutherford could see a significant loss in buying power if the pension proposal goes into effect next year.
If he were to retire next year, Rutherford would receive a pension worth about $115,000, based on his current $135,600 salary. While that amount will grow on a yearly basis, the database shows the pension changes would decrease the amount of growth by $44,800 in the first five years.
After 15 years, the database shows Rutherford would see $392,000 less than he would under the current pension setup. Two decades from now the projected loss would be $719,000.
The online database — http://www.weareoneillinois.org/documents/COLA-cut-spreadsheet.xlsx — is designed to show current state employees and retirees how a reduction in the state’s current 3 percent cost-of-living adjustment would affect worker pensions over a period of years.
* As Eric Zorn points out, Arizona has been waiting a very long time for the courts to rule on a state pension reform law…
In February, 2012, Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Eileen Willett issued a stinging rebuke to the legislature, declaring a key reform element unconstitutional in an action that had been filed by a group of schoolteachers.
“When the plaintiffs were hired as teachers, they entered a contractual relationship with the state regarding the public retirement system of which they became members,” said Willett’s written opinion. “Their retirement benefits were a valuable part of the consideration offered by their employers upon which the teachers relied when accepting employment.” […]
In May 2012, the state lost again in court, this time when Maricopa County Superior Court Judge John Buttrick used a similar constitutional rationale when ruling if favor of judicial retirees who’d challenged changes in the cost-of-living formula that was part of the pension-reform effort.
That case was fast-tracked to the Arizona Supreme Court on appeal, and three other legal challenges to the reforms were put on hold pending the outcome. But despite the attempted hurry-up, the justices didn’t hear oral argument in the case until June of this year and have yet to issue their ruling.
More than two and a half years after Arizona took the step that Illinois took this week, the reforms remain in legal limbo.
* Illinois Supreme Court Chief Justice Rita Garman was asked this week about pension reform…
News conferences — let alone a media scrum — are rare for a Supreme Court justice.
Maybe that’s due to the tensions between a judge’s analytical nature, the fact that they typically don’t comment on pending or potential litigation and the answer-me-now inquiries reporters can feel compelled to ask — something that showed up in the third question Garman faced.
“You’re coming in at a time when a potential pension case could come up,” one of the reporters stated. “How is that going to — what kind of dynamic will that mean?”
Behind Garman, the court’s spokesman bristled. The question presumably is about how Illinois’ high court would rule on a legislative change to the state’s pension laws — should such a bill make its way through the legislature, be signed into law, be challenged with a lawsuit and, finally, make its way to the Supreme Court.
“We deal with all the difficult cases,” Garman said, her deep blue eyes remaining fixed on the questioner. “As I tell my law clerks, if the cases weren’t tough, they wouldn’t need us. So we’re used to dealing with very difficult issues and we know that we are the ultimate decision-maker as to the constitutionality of laws that are passed in the state of Illinois.”
Despite her willingness to outline the question, it was nearly impossible to answer.
* I’ve linked a couple of times now to Bruce Rauner’s WLS interview this week on pension reform. Here’s the candidate struggling to remember the state Constitution’s protections of government pensions…
“Reduced or impaired, or something like that.”
The actual language…
Membership in any pension or retirement system of the State, any unit of local government or school district, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, shall be an enforceable contractual relationship, the benefits of which shall not be diminished or impaired.
* And the IEA’s spokesman was not happy at all with this Tribune editorial cartoon…
From the teachers’ union flak…
Oh, how the patrons of Chicago’s exclusive private clubs must have laughed at that cartoon.
I imagine men in very nice suits, surrounded by the aroma of expensive cigars, holding brandy snifters, elbowing each other in the ribs and pointing to the part of the dog that’s been “fixed,” chortling all the while.
Sickening.
The men and women of AFSCME provide services on which the people of our state rely. They work hard and have negotiated with their employer for compensation that is commensurate with the effort and skill involved in their jobs.
I’ll bet the original version of this cartoon had the dog tag reading “Unions,” but then someone probably pointed out that that would mean the paper would be taking a repugnant cheap shot at teachers, police officers and firefighters; people the paper would be less comfortable attacking.
As crack journalist Ron Burgundy likes to say, “stay classy.”
34 Comments
|
Question of the day
Friday, Dec 6, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* A photo from yesterday’s private signing ceremony of the pension reform bill…
* That pic was supplied by the governor’s office. The SJ-R used a different photo…
* The Question: Caption?
55 Comments
|
* While the world mourns the loss of Nelson Mandela and celebrates his amazing and purposeful life, it’s important to remember that we still have some real racial problems right here at home. Take, for instance, eight-term Williamson County State’s Attorney Charles Garnati…
The top prosecutor in a southern Illinois county is facing a legal ethics case because of racial remarks he made that derailed a murder trial.
Williamson County State’s Attorney Charles Garnati violated four legal ethics rules and “tends to defeat the administration of justice or to bring the courts or legal profession into disrepute,” contends the the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission in a Nov. 6 complaint that was made public on Wednesday. The defendant, who is black, was tried before an all-white jury in July 2011 and sentenced to 85 years before his conviction was reversed on appeal, reports the Chicago Tribune.
“Now in our white world, ladies and gentlemen,” said Garnati at one point during the trial, as he drew a distinction between the way the two races deal with police.
* The full ARDC complaint is here.
This is what Garnati told the all white jury in his opening statement about two black witnesses who had recanted their testimony…
“And you will see, ladies and gentlemen, that there are some, not all-there are many good people in the black community, but basically you will see that there are a few in the black community who refuse to cooperate with the police even when a murder happens right under their nose, and those people have a habit of intimidating, harassing, sometimes threatening anybody who they think is cooperating with the police. That’s what makes this case so difficult, ladies and gentlemen.”
* And this is what Garnati told the all white jury in his closing about those two black witnesses and the black defendant…
“But I think what is most crucial in deciding this case, in deciding the credibility of Jodie Lacy and Crystal Blye, and in deciding most of the other issues in this case, is to understand the culture of the black community here in Marion.
“Please, you have to keep in the back of your mind how many people in that community feel about law enforcement. You have to understand and keep in mind how they react to the police and to the prosecutors. Sometimes for people like us, that’s hard to understand. People were brought up to believe that the police were their friends; that when something happens, when we are in trouble, that the police are our friends. And that’s where we go to get help from is the police when bad things happen.
“But in the black community here in Marion, it’s just the opposite. Most-for whatever reasons, most of these people were raised to believe that the police and prosecutors are the enemy; that for some reason, we are always out to get them. In their mindset, the biggest sin that you could-that you can commit is to be a snitch in the community. The biggest sin that you could commit is to ever cooperate with the police on anything. It’s a sin to even cooperate when one of your own people gets brutally gunned down and is left to bleed to death.
“And I am not saying that the whole black community is like that, ladies and gentlemen. There are some very good law[-]abiding citizens in that community here in Marion. But the evidence has shown that again, for whatever reasons, there is an intense dislike and even hatred for the police. And this group of people who feel that way make it extremely hard on the people who are law-abiding and want to do what is right and who are willing to come forward and give information that they have when a crime has been committed . . .
“Now, in our white world, ladies and gentlemen, our automatic reaction in that type of situation, if somebody gives a statement to the police and then later on changes their story, the automatic response would be that that person is not trustful and that there is a problem with their credibility.
“But again, please look at their testimony and what they did and what they didn’t do through the eyes of the people who are raised, again, to feel that the police are always against them and that they cannot trust the police.”
* More…
“They both stated that the defendant — that (victim) LaQuinn Hudson was backing up. He kept saying, ‘I got nothing. I got nothing.’ He not only said that, but both of them said he raised his white T-shirt up to show his waist band that he had nothing. OK? And in the black community, that is where they keep their handguns is in their waistbands, ladies and gentlemen, with something covering it. They don’t just walk around with it in their hand or, you know, sticking out of their pocket.”
* Months after the Chicago Tribune made a big deal out of this, Garnati eventually back-tracked and agreed the defendant should receive a new trial.
* What happens next…
The Illinois Appellate Court… ordered [a] new trial in September.
The case against Garnati will go to a panel of the disciplinary commission’s hearing board, which will hear evidence and make recommendations for any discipline. The Illinois Supreme Court makes the final decision on attorney discipline cases.
Steve Greenberg, a Chicago attorney who handled Marshall’s appeal, said that he had made a complaint to the disciplinary commission.
“I think anyone who espouses those racist views is unfit to be the state’s attorney of a county,” Greenberg said Wednesday. “Imagine how many charging decisions over the years were racially motivated in the (time) he’s been state’s attorney.”
Ugh.
35 Comments
|
* The Guardian got its hands on an internal document from the State Policy Network that includes grant proposals from several conservative state-level “think tanks.” The proposals represent, according to the Guardian, “a co-ordinated assault against public sector rights and services.”
According to the Guardian, the State Policy Network “has an annual warchest of $83m drawn from major donors like David Koch and food giant Kraft.” Local background here.
* Now, on to the Guardian’s story…
The proposal from the Illinois Policy Institute for a campaign to deal with Chicago’s government worker pensions crisis by switching to 401(k)-style retirement plans similarly focuses on a politician – in this case Mayor Rahm Emanuel. The proposal says that “Mayor Emanuel has privately expressed the need for 401(k)-style changes to truly achieve reform.”
The institute plans to “leverage the leadership potential of Mayor Emanuel … as the spark for wider pension changes in Illinois.” It adds that “friendly legislators would be welcome to draft legislation modelled on our policy work and work in tandem with Mayor Emanuel to move it forward in the legislative process.”
John Tillman, CEO of the Illinois Policy Institute, told the Guardian that Emanuel had been “an outspoken proponent of pension reform that includes moving to a 401(k)-style, defined contribution system.” He saw no problem with the lobbying that the think tank undertakes.
“We are not allowed to do any campaigning or electioneering, and we don’t. We are allowed to spend a significant percentage of our expenditures on lobbying and we are very proactive in lobbying for liberty-based policy, including the urgently needed pension reform. We report our activities accordingly.”
* A summary of the Illinois Policy Institute’s grant proposal…
* And here’s an excerpt of the full grant proposal posted by the Guardian…
* So far, Mayor Emanuel has not yet given the General Assembly a draft of his proposals. If he does, indeed, “privately” support replacing current pensions with 401(K) plans, he hasn’t yet put those ideas on paper.
Whatever the case, the Illinois Policy Institute obviously has no plans to drop its constant demands for a defined contribution “pension” system to replace defined benefits. The state lobbying was just the beginning.
*** UPDATE *** From a Mayor Emanuel spokesperson…
The administration has not been in touch with the Policy Institute on this issue. We support choice and optional defined contribution plan for new employees just like the state law signed by the governor.
So, somebody’s lying. And since the mayor’s office is pretty specific on both points, I don’t think it’s them.
23 Comments
|
Re: Madigan and the courts
Friday, Dec 6, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* So many commenters yesterday bemoaned their belief that House Speaker Michael Madigan “owns” the Illinois Supreme Court that prominent pension issue commenter RNUG finally weighed in…
I realize this is Illinois and a lot of you think the fix is in, but stop and think it through a bit.
Once you become an [Illinois Supreme Court] justice, the only place left to go up is the federal system and, unless you’re in the running for SCOTUS, it’s pretty much a step down in terms of power and prestige. The usual path is to reach ISC, hang around to get your turn at Chief Justice, then, if you’re ready to go, retire. Otherwise you hang around some more until the workload gets to be too much.
MJM may have helped put a judge on the ISC initially, and maybe the judge owes MJM, but MJM can’t directly remove a judge from the ISC. Once they are there, they are there for 10 years at a time, and their re-election is a simple “Shall x be retained?” question. It’s not the same as running a campaign for re-election. Effectively speaking, once you make it, you are there for life or until you choose to step down. For the first time in their political life, a judge on the ISC is pretty much answerable to no one.
Yes, a judge could harbor hopes of retiring from the ISC and be “of consul” to any number of prestigious law firms, and in that case, MJM’s backing might help. But there’s no guarantee that such help would be needed. Big law firms like to have people like former Governors, Senators and Supreme Court Justices on their letterhead, and pay big money for that privilege.
Practically speaking, once they reach that level, an ISC Justice is free to do whatever they want on court decisions.
The paranoia out there is really, truly intense. Some of y’all need to tone it down. Way down.
85 Comments
|
* Bruce Rauner was asked this week how he would deal with the General Assembly. His response…
“We’re gonna raise a PAC, we’re gonna raise a fund dedicated to the state Legislature, members of both parties who take the tough votes. We’ve gotta protect the members who take tough votes.
“Right now, Madigan controls the Legislature from his little pot of cash. It isn’t that much money. And he runs the whole state government out of that pot.
“We need a pro-business, pro-growth, pro-limited government, pro-tax reduction PAC down there in Springfield working with the Legislature for those who take tough votes.”
Rod Blagojevich tried to do a similar thing with a new PAC (Move Illinois Forward) and failed. But Blagojevich was raising money from his fellow Democrats, who didn’t want to step on Madigan’s toes. The Republican Rauner won’t be facing a reticent crowd, and he’s so rich that he can always put lots money in himself.
Thoughts?
Full interview here…
82 Comments
|
UNO chief steps down
Friday, Dec 6, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Sun-Times…
Juan Rangel, longtime leader of the politically powerful United Neighborhood Organization, has stepped aside from his $250,000-a-year post as UNO’s chief executive in the wake of a scandal that cost the group millions of dollars in state funding and led to a federal investigation of its bond dealings.
The influential Hispanic community group operates the largest charter-school network in Illinois.
Rangel’s departure “by mutual agreement” with the board of the not-for-profit group is effective immediately, UNO officials said Friday.
Rangel had three family members on the UNO payroll. Sources said two of the relatives quit recently, including deputy chief of staff Carlos Jaramillo, Rangel’s nephew.
Reached by phone, Rangel hung up on a reporter.
* More…
UNO has ties to some of the most powerful politicians in Illinois including Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan, Ald. Ed Burke (14th) and Mayor Rahm Emanuel, whose 2011 campaign Rangel co-chaired. He currently sits on the Public Building Commission of Chicago’s board of commissioners and helped found the Metropolitan Leadership Institute (MLI), a group that prepares young Hispanic professionals for careers in politics and government, and corporate and nonprofit arenas.
Rangel became CEO of UNO in 1996 and spurred its aggressive growth into the largest charter school network in Illinois with 11 schools under its charge. An ongoing Sun-Times investigation into how it awarded contracts related to a $98 million grant to build three new schools revealed bids were won by companies owned by the brothers of former UNO executive Miguel D’Escoto. The two companies, Reflection Windows Co. and d’Escoto Inc., were paid $8.5 million from that grant. D’Escoto resigned in February but Reflection Windows continues to receive business from the group.
Part of the focus of the SEC’s investigation into UNO’s bond dealings focuses on one of the underwriters of the bonds. Cabrera Capital Markets is a company owned by Martin Cabrera Jr., who resigned as UNO board chairman in September. Cabrera was on the board for only 3-½ months. Gov. Quinn has twice suspended paying out the remainder of the grant to UNO.
Rangel previously stepped down as UNO chairman in May but retained his CEO role. He’ll now be replaced by interim chief of operations Jesse Estrada.
9 Comments
|
More Golden Horseshoes
Friday, Dec 6, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* This morning’s categories…
* The Beth Hamilton Golden Horseshoe Award for Best House Secretary/Admin. Assistant
* Best Senate Secretary/Admin. Assistant
Beth is no longer with the House, but I’m gonna keep her name on the award for this year at least.
Keep in mind that this is about intensity far more than it is about the number of votes, so please explain your vote or I won’t give it much thought. Also, please nominate in both categories. Thanks!
* I’ll announce yesterday’s winners later today. We had very few nominations for best bartender/wait staff, probably because of the pension reform bill signing, so please click here and make your nominations there as well.
37 Comments
|
This just in… Pension bill signed
Thursday, Dec 5, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From a press release, and check out MJM’s high praise for himself…
Governor Pat Quinn today signed into law his number one priority – historic legislation that addresses the most critical fiscal challenge in Illinois by reforming the state’s pension systems. This comprehensive pension reform solution will eliminate the state’s unfunded liability and fully fund the pension systems, a standard set by the Governor two years ago.
After inheriting the worst-funded pension crisis in the nation that was 70 years in the making, Governor Quinn made pension reform his top priority and worked with legislative leaders and legislators to pass Senate Bill 1. In June, he proposed a conference committee to break the ongoing legislative gridlock, and this vehicle led to the bill he signed today. Earlier this year, the Governor suspended legislative salaries and refused to accept his own salary until pension reform was sent to his desk.
“Illinois is moving forward,” Governor Quinn said. “This is a serious solution to address the most dire fiscal challenge of our time. I applaud House Speaker Michael Madigan, Senate President John Cullerton, House Minority Leader Jim Durkin, Senate Minority Leader Christine Radogno, Senator Kwame Raoul, Senator Daniel Biss, Representative Elaine Nekritz, Representative Darlene Senger, members of the conference committee, and legislators from both parties who made this day possible. Working together, we will continue to build a brighter future for the people of Illinois.”
Sponsored by Senator Kwame Raoul (D-Chicago) and Speaker Michael Madigan (D-Chicago), Senate Bill 1 will eliminate the state’s unfunded pension liability and fully stabilize the systems to ensure retirement security for employees who have faithfully contributed to the systems. All four leaders worked tirelessly to negotiate and pass this legislation.
“The bill would not have passed without me. I was convinced that standing fast for substantial savings, clear intent and an end to unaffordable annual raises would result in a sound plan that will meet all constitutional challenges,” Speaker Madigan said.
“I applaud the Governor for prioritizing this issue,” Senate President Cullerton said. “I look forward to working with him and all legislative leaders to ensure that we continue on this path of fiscal leadership and bipartisan cooperation.”
“With today’s bill signing we have staved off a greater crisis,” Leader Durkin said. “I am proud many of the significant components are Republican ideas generated by the conference committee, and my predecessor through Senate Bill 1. We should place value into Fitch Ratings’ initial comments viewing our actions as positive and I am confident this law will withstand a court challenge and feel it is a major victory for Illinois taxpayers.”
“This is a major step forward in putting Illinois on the path to financial recovery,” Leader Radogno said. “It is the result of bipartisan, bicameral negotiations, after a great deal of debate and discussions. It will demonstrate to the credit rating agencies and job creators that we are serious about turning Illinois around. This is not the only step we need to take to get Illinois back on track. But it is a significant step at a time when doing nothing would only make our problems worse. I’m proud of the bipartisan effort and its result. Now we need to build on this momentum.”
Under the new law, the state will adopt an actuarially sound funding schedule that requires level payments and achieves 100 percent funding no later than the end of fiscal year 2044. To prevent future governors and legislatures from repeating the same behavior that helped create the pension crisis, the law includes a funding guarantee, giving retirement systems the right to go to court if the state fails to make the required payment to the pension fund.
Under the new law, there will be no reductions in the pension checks going out to current retirees. The law will also minimize the impact on the lower-earning, longer-serving employees. There will continue to be Cost of Living Adjustments (COLA); however, they will grow at a slower rate. For most employees, the COLA will be adjusted from the current 3 percent annually compounding increases that are unsustainable to a new formula based on years of service that includes protections for lower-earning, longer-serving employees.
For example, under the new law, a 65-year-old retired state conservation worker with 20 years of service receiving a $17,000 state pension will see that grow to about $22,000 over 10 years. Prior to the law, that would have grown to about $22,400 over 10 years.
Under the new law, current active employees will see COLA pauses every other year upon retirement, with the number of pauses determined by current age. The law also reduces the amount of money current employees pay into their pensions by one percent.
In addition, pensionable salary will now be capped at the greater of the Tier 2 salary cap ($109,971 for 2013), the employee’s current salary, or the employee’s salary at the end of an existing collective bargaining agreement. The cap will increase over time, based on the consumer price index (CPI). There will also be graduated increases in retirement age based on the age of the employee, with a maximum increase of five years. The bill also creates an optional 401(k)-style defined contribution plan that will be available for up to 5 percent of Tier 1 employees. Senate Bill 1 goes into effect on June 1, 2014.
Since taking the oath of office, Governor Pat Quinn has made pension reform his top priority in order to restore fiscal stability to Illinois. Unlike his predecessors, he made the full pension payment each year. In May 2009, Governor Quinn established the Pension Modernization Task Force, which laid the foundation for future reform efforts. In 2010, despite intense opposition, he signed into law sweeping pension reform for new hires to save taxpayers billions of dollars.
In January 2012, the Governor convened a pension reform working group to develop a comprehensive solution. Three months later, Governor Quinn proposed a comprehensive pension reform plan that erased the unfunded liability, and refused to sign any legislation that didn’t meet that standard. The Governor also released several studies on the dire impact of pension inaction on education and launched an online campaign to raise awareness about the pension squeeze and the urgent need for reform.
\In June 2013, the Governor proposed a conference committee as a vehicle to break legislative gridlock between the two chambers. He asked the conference committee to forge a compromise that provided 100 percent funding for the systems, which ultimately became the legislation he signed today.
In addition, Governor Quinn also signed Senate Bill 1961 today. Sponsored by Speaker Madigan and Senator William R. Haine (D-Alton), the bill clarifies that the Attorney General will represent the pension systems in any court proceedings, except in cases where the systems are seeking to force the state to make funding payments. The new law takes effect immediately.
* From the We Are One Illinois coalition…
“Governor Pat Quinn has given hundreds of thousands of working and retired teachers, nurses, police, caregivers, first responders, and others no alternative but to seek justice for retirement security through the judicial system. Contrary to his belief, every Illinois citizen loses today.
“It didn’t have to be this way. Bipartisan majorities in both chambers could have passed a much fairer, legal, negotiated solution - with real, substantial savings - in Senate Bill 2404.
“Instead, leading politicians and their followers chose to violate their oaths of office, trample on the Illinois Constitution, and willfully ignore the plain letter of the law. In abandoning their constitutional duties, they’ve voted to slash the retirement benefits of senior citizens and working families by one-third or more.
“Senate Bill 1 is attempted pension theft, and it’s illegal. Once overturned, its purported savings will evaporate, and the state’s finances and pension systems will be left in worse shape.
“Our coalition has been consistently in contact with our attorneys, and today we directed them to prepare to file suit. We will challenge SB 1 as violating the constitution and ask for a stay of the legislation’s implementation pending a ruling on its constitutionality.”
144 Comments
|
* In These Times…
According to one campaigner for the recently passed marriage equality bill, [House Speaker Michael Madigan] demanded support for his pension bill from the major sponsors of the bill as a price for bringing it to the floor.
* By my count, of those who were around for both votes, 13 of the House’s Democratic gay marriage sponsors voted for Madigan’s pension reform bill back in May. Six voted against.
Just three of those previous “No” votes switched to “Yes” this week. One of those who switched was Rep. Lou Lang, a top member of leadership. He basically had no choice. The other two were Reps. Kelly Cassidy and Ann Williams, who explained her vote to constituents…
I have consistently voted against “pension reform” bills that I believed went too far; many took a punitive approach to addressing the problem. I understand that the public employees are not at fault here. On a personal level, this was the most difficult decision I have made as a legislator. But it is also unfair to continue the downward spiral of cutting programs and funding for our neighborhood schools, the mentally ill and disabled, and other critical human services.
While this bill is certainly not perfect, it is significantly improved from the previous version of SB 1, which I did not support. Over the past several months, I worked to make sure that whatever pension bill was passed would be the best bill possible. I pushed for a guarantee that the State will make its pension payment, so we don’t end up right back here in the future. This bill contains that. I strongly advocated for protections for the people at the lowest end of the income scale, and fought to ensure that any changes to COLA be tied to the CPI, to help pensions keep up with inflation. This bill does that. I asked that if benefits must be cut, then it only made sense for employees to contribute less. This bill does that. I believe the legislation that passed is better because of these efforts.
Cassidy was clearly upset when voting for the pension bill. I don’t doubt that something was up with both her and Williams.
But another Democratic gay marriage co-sponsor, Rep. Jehan Gordon-Booth, switched from “Yes” on pension reform in May to “Present” this week.
So, the net gain was just two votes. The bill passed with 62 votes, two more than needed.
Pressure? Probably. But it really didn’t matter in the end.
*** UPDATE 1 *** “I would never trade a vote like that,” said Rep. Williams, calling the allegation in the ITT piece “absolutely ridiculous.” She also said there were no conversations with Madigan about the bill.
*** UPDATE 2 *** Rep. Cassidy: “So much less than true it couldn’t be more ridiculous. [Madigan] never spoke to me about the bill once.” She also called the allegation “patent crap.”
11 Comments
|
Unclear on the concept
Thursday, Dec 5, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From a Northwest Herald editorial blasting the pension reform bill…
If they were truly determined to solve the problem, they would have held this vote before Dec. 3 – the day after the current crop of lawmakers found out who they would be facing in the March primary.
Voting for a controversial bill after the filing deadline makes said bill a little easier to pass. So, if the bill was made even tougher on retirees and employees, holding a vote before the filing deadline would’ve been pointless.
* John Kass climbed aboard the Bruce Rauner bandwagon in his column critiquing the pension bill. He doesn’t mention Rauner’s name, of course…
It doesn’t freeze cost-of-living increases for public employees or put them all on 401(k) plans like many of us are stuck with.
* The bill that Kass appears to love, Rauner supports and the Illinois Policy Institute claims is based on its own draft was introduced in February of this year.
The bill is so “popular” that only three members have signed on: Reps. Jeanne Ives, Tom Morrison (who, with Ives, voted against the pension bill this week after voting for Madigan’s bill) and Barb Wheeler (who voted for both the Madigan bill and the pension bill this week).
Over in the Senate, an identical bill that accomplishes the Rauner/Kass/Illinois Policy Institute goals is sponsored by Sen. Jim Oberweis, who voted for the pension bill this week. Oberweis lined up precisely zero co-sponsors.
In other words, almost nobody in their right minds wants to touch this thing. And yet it’s held up as a viable alternative. On what planet do they live on?
* Rauner, by the way, was on Roe Conn’s show yesterday and claimed he’s been meeting with AFSCME members and teachers…
“Many of them are supporting our campaign.”
You gotta wonder what his definition of “many” is.
Listen to the interview…
49 Comments
|
Question of the day
Thursday, Dec 5, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* We’re getting a late start because the pension reform debate pretty much sucked all the air out of the Statehouse. So, let’s continue with our Golden Horseshoe Awards…
* Best session bartender
* Best session waiter/waitress
Remember, as always, intensity of your nominations will count far more than the number of nominations. So, please explain your votes or they will be mostly ignored. Thanks much.
15 Comments
|
Houston, we have a round-tabling problem
Thursday, Dec 5, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Remember that story yesterday about the Chicago Republican Party preparing to challenge the petitions of the planted Republican candidate who is “opposing” Speaker Michael Madigan?
Well, the Chicago GOP may indeed have a valid point. From Illinois Review…
It’s Mr. Goggin’s petitions and signatures that the Chicago GOP started scouring this week, hoping to find enough duplications and errors to oust Goggin from the 22nd House District 2014 GOP primary ballot slot.
The Chicago GOP isn’t just blowin’ smoke, either. They’ve found signatures that are already raising questions - just as they are getting started. And, Chicago GOP’s spokesman Chris Cleveland says, they’re really in need of help to go over each signature before next Monday.
Here’s what they’ve found thus far - an uncanny amount of signatures that appear to be the same handwriting, most often from the same reported address:
A representative sample of scans of what are alleged to be from the Madigan opponent’s petitions…

Yikes.
Click here for more of the same.
If the Republicans can kick this guy off the ballot, or use evidence of fraud to force him to resign, the GOP can then appoint a “real” candidate to the race.
…Adding… As someone pointed out in comments, this could be a case of household members signing for everybody. If that’s true, then it’s doubtful there would be any huge legal problems, but those sigs would be discarded.
44 Comments
|
Confirming the obvious
Thursday, Dec 5, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Adam Rosen is the Communications Director for SEIU Local 73. He told the Associated Press that in the run-up to the pension reform vote, two Republican gubernatorial candidates sought endorsements from the union…
Rosen told the AP the union has met with two Republican gubernatorial bidders seeking future endorsements. Republican state Sen. Kirk Dillard and state treasurer Dan Rutherford both spoke out against the pension plan, which passed by narrow margins.
Do you think the unions will endorse either one of them?
41 Comments
|
Amazon restarts Illinois associates program
Thursday, Dec 5, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Forwarded by a reader…
From: “Amazon Associates”
To: xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2013 5:55:32 PM
Subject: Amazon Associates program is again open to residents of the State of Illinois
Hello,
We’re pleased to announce that the Amazon Associates program is again open to residents of the State of Illinois.
We’re now able to re-open the program because the Illinois State Supreme Court recently struck down legislation that had forced Amazon to close the program to residents of Illinois.
Amazon strongly supports federal legislation like the Marketplace Fairness Act that’s now pending before Congress, which is the only constitutional way to resolve interstate sales tax collection issues.
Some background from October…
The Illinois Supreme Court threw out a state law Friday that taxes certain Internet sales, saying the so-called “Amazon tax” violated federal rules against “discriminatory taxes” on digital transactions.
The 6-1 ruling represented the first time a court had invalidated an Internet sales tax law among 18 states that have them. It brought an immediate cry from traditional, store-based retailers for Congress to step into regulating taxes on web sales.
The court determined that Illinois’ 2011 “Main Street Fairness Act” was superseded by the federal law, which prohibits imposing a tax on “electronic commerce” and obligates collection that’s not required of transactions by other means, such as print or television.
More background here.
* In other news, as you’ll recall the Illinois Supreme Court recently struck down the Department of Revenue’s sales tax collection rules. The ruling came in a case involving a fuel oil company which opened a satellite office in a low-tax county in order to avoid paying higher sales taxes to the RTA and Cook County. Tom Johnson, the President emeritus of the Taxpayers Federation, argues in Crain’s that new rules will be tough to devise…
The problem is for the many retailers that take orders over the phone, through the mail or on the Internet and then have the goods delivered to their customer from either their own or from a supplier’s inventory. The “sales” activities could occur in more than one community in Illinois or even in another state dependent on the facts of a particular sale. Which tax rate should apply, and what if the majority of the selling activity is out of state?
Our state’s tax collectors deserve rules they can follow and should not be subjected to second-guessing years after the fact. A case-by-case weighing of a near-limitless number of factors would fly in the face of good tax policy and be unworkable.
Tax must be calculated and collected at the time of the sale, but a nebulous factor-weighing test would require almost every retailer with more than one location in the state to engage in guesswork, putting them in a never-ending game of “gotcha.” When they collected too little tax, the state or local jurisdictions would sue; when they collected too much tax, class-action lawsuits on behalf of inadvertently overtaxed customers certainly would follow.
Now that this Pandora’s box of tax administration has been opened, it is the Department of Revenue’s job to help its partners comply easily. Guessing is not an option.
9 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
Today’s must-watch video
Thursday, Dec 5, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Sen. Matt Murphy sat on the pension reform conference committee. Murphy’s seat mate is Sen. Kirk Dillard, who had strongly supported every pension bill that came down the pike except for the union-negotiated proposal. Dillard’s campaign posted a video of the candidate explaining his vote on the Senate floor. Reboot Illinois watched the video and wrote this…
Dillard’s deskmate, Sen. Matt Murphy (a member of the committee that drafted the bill) is patient with his colleague at first. But his body language is practically screaming as Dillard goes on. And it’s not screaming, “You go, Kirk!” Be sure to watch until the very last second, when Murphy appears to either cheer that it’s over or let out a long yawn, possibly both. - See more at: http://www.rebootillinois.com/?eopinion=9426&utm_source=email&utm_medium=video-of-the-day-pensions-12/5/2013&utm_campaign=murphy-speaks-body-language-to-dillard:-shut-up-already!-12/5/2013#sthash.np7BYKMU.dpuf
* Murph starts out by deliberately looking away. Then he begins to drum his fingers on the table, twirls around in his chair, rocks way back and forth, fiddles with his tie, makes notes, puffs out his cheeks, shields his eyes from Dillard and, does indeed, yawn at the end. Hilarious…
Maybe he needs a new seat mate.
* Meanwhile, Reboot also produced a handy chart comparing Speaker Madigan’s pension bill from May to the bill that finally passed. Click here for a larger version…
* And Speaker Madigan told reporters late Tuesday how he was able to bridge the gap between Senate Democrats who were concerned about the impact on retirees and House and Senate Republican negotiators who wanted more savings from the legislation…
Madigan: “In the end, just a few days ago, I was the one who made two critical suggestions.
“Number one, I’m the one that said that in terms of the inflation adjuster on the COLA it ought to go to the full consumer price index, which was a significant change because the House bill had provided for flat COLA, no change. The conference committee was talking about one-half of CPI. I’m the one that said, especially to the Senate Democrats, let’s use the full CPI which of course would reduce the cost savings.
“But then we would make that up by my second suggestion, which was to take 10 percent of the savings coming out of the bill and dedicate that to the pension system. Put it all together, you’re back over $160 billion in total cost savings, which was a strong demand from Republicans.”
Q: That 10 percent came in the final days?
Madigan: “Final days. Just before Thanksgiving. And I was the one who fashioned the compromise.”
Q: Did you have to make any promises to get those?
Madigan: “Just to be nice to reporters for a change.”
58 Comments
|
Golden Horseshoe Awards, round one
Thursday, Dec 5, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Keep in mind that it’s very important to explain your votes. The number of votes isn’t nearly as important as the intensity of the reasoning behind who y’all think are the best in each category. Also, please make sure to make nominations in both categories.
Clear on the concept? OK, let’s get started…
* Best political bar in Springfield
* Best political restaurant in Springfield
28 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
Watch the bouncing ball
Wednesday, Dec 4, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* State Sen. Kirk Dillard was on a Quincy radio station this morning. A quote…
“Pat Quinn didn’t lift a finger to pass pension reform.”
…Said the guy who voted “No” on pension reform yesterday.
Dillard, by the way, talked about another reason for voting against the bill yesterday. He’s concerned about how all those savings were going to be spent.
* Dillard appeared on the show with his running mate, Rep. Jil Tracy, who voted for the pension reform bill yesterday. Go to the six-minute mark to watch her try to explain her difference of opinion with Dillard…
* Rep. Tracy said she thought the bill was a “fair and reasonable solution.” More…
“I felt like this was a very decent product to put out there and it did pass very narrowly, but I came at it from a different point of reference and as a conference committee member I did support it.”
* The night before, Dillard spoke to a Quincy tea party meeting…
He said he voted against in-state tuition for illegal immigrants noting that State Sen. Bill Brady [voted for it].
More…
“I am the one candidate that I believe will receive substantial African American support… I believe that if I’m the nominee, Rev. James Meeks, the largest black Baptist pastor in the City of Chicago, a congregation of 20,000 people, will endorse me for governor.”
Video…
* Dillard also spoke on today’s radio program about the Barack Obama campaign TV ad he appeared in…
“He used a clip of mine and I never thought it would get on TV.”
Um, OK.
50 Comments
|
Davis poll confirms huge lead
Wednesday, Dec 4, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Roll Call…
Freshman Rep. Rodney Davis, R-Ill., holds a large lead over his GOP primary opponent, former Miss America Erika Harold, according to a poll obtained exclusively by CQ Roll Call.
Davis leads Harold by a massive 48 points in the poll of likely GOP primary voters commissioned by his campaign and conducted by the GOP survey firm Public Opinion Strategies. Twenty percent of respondents in the poll said they were undecided.
The survey showed Davis with 63 percent and Harold with 15 percent.
The results underscore Harold has a monumental challenge ahead to defeat Davis in the primary — which is just over three months away on March 18. Ninety-three percent of respondents said they had heard of Davis, while 45 percent said they have heard of Harold.
The poll interviewed 400 likely Republican primary voters via live telephone surveys between Nov. 19 and Nov. 21. It had a margin of error of 4.9 percent.
Harold also has a severe cash disadvantage, reporting just $99,000 in cash on hand at the end of the last quarter. Davis reported $882,000 in the bank at the time.
* Those numbers are almost exactly the same as an October 10th We Ask America poll…
The poll of 859 Republicans, taken Oct. 10, showed that Davis was the choice of 63 percent of the likely Republican voters, to 16 percent for Harold. About 21 percent of those polled were undecided. The poll had a margin of error of plus or minus 3.34 percent.
A poll taken exactly four months earlier, on June 10, by the same Springfield polling firm, We Ask America, found that Republicans favored Davis, 53.55 percent to 16.38 percent.
16 Comments
|
Today’s numbers
Wednesday, Dec 4, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The AP published some pension reform bill impact numbers from the Center for Tax and Budget Accountability…
Employee 1
Retired teacher, 30 years of service
Initial annual benefit: $67,000
Annual pension benefit after 20 years of retirement: $121,009 a year under the current pension system; $91,183 under the proposed changes
Cumulative 20-year decrease: $284,030
Employee 2
Retired Department of Children and Family Services caseworker, 25 years of service
Initial annual benefit: $30,000
Annual pension benefit after 20 years of retirement: $54,183 under current system; $46,122 under proposed changes
Cumulative 20-year decrease: $76,765
Employee 3
Retired teacher, age 75, with 30 years of service
Initial annual benefit: $25,000
Retiree’s COLA increase would remain unchanged until benefit reaches $30,000, which is years of service multiplied by $1,000. After that, the annual benefit would drop below what it would be under the current system.
Annual pension benefit after 10 years: $33,598 under current system; $33,529 under proposed changes
Cumulative 10-year decrease: $137
91 Comments
|
Question of the day
Wednesday, Dec 4, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Here are our 2012 Golden Horseshoe Award winners, with runners up in parentheses…
* The Wordslinger Golden Horseshoe Award for Best CapitolFax.com Commenter: Oswego Willy (Michelle Flaherty)
* The Mike McClain Golden Horseshoe Award for Best Statehouse Insider: Mike McClain
* Best Statewide Officeholder: Auditor General Bill Holland (Comptroller Judy Baar Topinka)
* Best “Do-Gooder” Lobbyist: Bruce Simon (Kathy Drea)
* Best Contract Lobbyist: Tom Cullen (Ed Peck)
* Best In-House Lobbyist: Rob Karr (Mark Denzler)
* Best Legislative Liaison: Bresha Brewer (Cameron Schilling)
* Best Illinois Congresscritter: US Sen. Dick Durbin (Congressman Bob Dold)
* Best State Agency Director: Malcom Weems (Amy Martin)
* The Mark Beaubien Lifetime Service award for the Illinois House: Rep. Skip Saviano, Rep. Joe Lyons (tie)
* The John Millner Lifetime Service award for the Illinois Senate: Sen. Susan Garrett (Sen. Tom Johnson)
* Best Illinois State Senator - Republican: Sen. Matt Murphy (Sen. Pam Althoff)
* Best Illinois State Senator - Democrat: Sen. Don Harmon (Sen. Dan Kotowski)
* Best Illinois State Representative - Republican: Rep. Jim Durkin (Rep. David Harris)
* Best Illinois State Representative - Democrat: Rep. Elaine Nekritz (Rep. Greg Harris)
* The Steve Brown Golden Horseshoe Award for Best Government Spokesperson: Joe Tybor (John Patterson)
* Best legislative campaign staff director: Will Cousineau (Brendan O’Sullivan)
* Best campaign staffer - Illinois House Democrats: Shaw Decremer, Kristen Bauer (tie)
* Best campaign staffer - Illinois House Republicans: Bob Stefanski (Nick Bellini)
* Best campaign staffer - Senate Democrats: Jill Dykhoff (Sam Strain)
* Best campaign staffer - Senate Republicans: Helen Albert (Rachel Bold)
* Best State Senate Staffer - Non Political: Giovanni Randazzo (Kim Schultz)
* Best State House Staffer - Non Political: Samantha Olds (Tyler Hunt)
* The Beth Hamilton Golden Horseshoe Award for Best House Secretary/Admin. Assistant: Carol Shehorn, Sally McDaniel-Smith (tie)
* Best Senate Secretary/Admin. Assistant: Robin Gragg (Melissa Earle)
* Best political bar in Springfield: DH Brown’s (JP Kelly’s)
* Best political restaurant in Springfield: Sebastian’s (Saputo’s)
* Best bartender: Mike at DH Brown’s (Jamie at Boone’s)
* Best waiter/waitress: Annie at Sunrise (Jess at Brown’s)
* The Question: Any suggestions for additions and/or subtractions? It may be getting too long.
We kick off the awards again tomorrow, so start thinking about your faves.
40 Comments
|
Raters, markets like reforms, but…
Wednesday, Dec 4, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From Fitch Ratings…
Fitch views the passage of pension reform legislation in Illinois yesterday as a positive indication of the state’s willingness to take action on this complicated issue after many failed attempts. Fitch has stated that pension reform that enhances the funding levels of the pension systems and controls the growing impact of pension payments on the budget is necessary to stabilize the credit, and will analyze the reform to determine the extent to which it does so. Supporters have stated that the reforms will save $160 billion over the next 30 years; however, the actual impact of the reform will not be entirely known until an actuarial study has been completed. Further, legal protection of pension benefits is particularly strong in Illinois and Fitch believes legal challenge to the reform is likely.
Fitch’s rating on Illinois, at ‘A-’, with a Negative Rating Outlook, is the lowest for a U.S. state. This reflects a record of the state’s unwillingness to address its numerous fiscal challenges, including but not limited to the large and growing unfunded pension liability. In addition to action on pensions, maintenance of the rating will require timely action on a more permanent budget solution to the structural mismatch between spending and revenues in advance of the expiration of temporary tax increases. Temporary increases in both the personal and corporate income taxes that have been supporting the budget since 2011 are scheduled to begin to phase out in fiscal 2015, which begins on July 1. [Emphasis added.]
* Crain’s talked to Moody’s…
For Moody’s, breaking the gridlock over pension reform was almost as important as the agreement itself — but any decisions on the state’s credit rating won’t be made until analysts review the actuarial data underlying savings claims.
“Interestingly, the legislature’s action does appear to end a long period of political paralysis,” said Ted Hampton, a vice president and senior Illinois analyst for the Wall Street credit rating agency. “We’ve lowered the rating repeatedly because of the legislature’s failure to deal with this problem. The legislature has taken some action to alter that history of being unable to reach any agreement. I think that’s significant.”
“Based on what we’ve heard, these reforms do appear substantial,” he added, if the actuarial analysis backs them up. “The other big asterisk is that we have to see how this reform package fares in the courts.”
* And…
Municipal bonds from Illinois rallied to a one-month high after lawmakers broke through decades of political gridlock to pass a measure addressing the nation’s worst-funded state pension system.
About $4.4 million of taxable Illinois general-obligation bonds maturing in March 2016 traded today at an average yield of 1.8 percent, the lowest since Nov. 8, data compiled by Bloomberg show. Yields move inversely to prices. The volume that changed hands was the highest since July.
The “good” news, as far was Wall St. goes, is that the General Assembly was finally able to come to a bipartisan agreement.
The bad news is the aggressive push-back against this agreement between Democrats and Republicans from GOP Sen. Mark Kirk, Bruce Rauner, the richest man in Illinois Ken Griffin as well as tea partier types like Sen. Jim Oberweis’ US Senate primary opponent will make it difficult to forge more such agreements on other issues down the road.
* What the Rauner/Illinois Policy Institute/Etc. cabal wants is for the Republicans to withdraw from negotiations and make the Democrats take all the hard votes by themselves. Dan Proft sent this out Monday…
According to [the Republican legislative leaders’] conduct, being the wheelman for Chicago Democrats’ latest heist of Illinois taxpayers (and public sector pensioneers) is morally superior and politically preferable to not participating in the crime. […]
Sen. Radogno appeared on the WLS radio show I co-host in Chicago this morning defending her support for the Madigan pension deformation legislation wherein she said, “I didn’t come (to Springfield) to play partisan games.”
Clearly. And that post-partisan patter is precisely why Republicans are in the super-minority.
35 Comments
|
Today’s funny
Wednesday, Dec 4, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Fox 32 has a pretty funny story about Speaker Michael Madigan’s “Republican” opponent Terrence Goggin, who is running “against” Madigan for the fourth time since 1998, even though local Republican Party officials have never met the man. He’s an obvious plant…
Angela Reyes, a circulator for Goggin, said she would be happy to discuss the petitions she passed for him until she was questioned further.
Reyes father said that she had no comment and that the only thing he knew about her political affiliations was that she would go with the precinct captain to interpret for the Spanish people in that district, seemingly making her a Madigan supporter.
* But check this out…
Another odd twist to the question of Goggin’s running stance is the Republican Party’s plans to challenge the petitions filed by him to try and knock him off the ballot.
According to [Chris Cleveland, Vice Chair of the Chicago Republican Party], “We’re tired of the Democrats mucking around in our internal process. We’re tired of Mike Madigan’s sleazy tricks. We have raised money all year for this. We are ready to take him on.”
Cleveland says the idea is to find enough bad signature’s on Goggin’s petitions that he’s disqualified; then, slate a real Republican to run in the general election.
OK, first of all, if the Chicago Republican Party has truly “raised money all year for this,” then why didn’t they try to put a candidate on the ballot in the first place? No guts, no glory.
And secondly, do they really think that MJM’s organization is careless enough to muck up Groggins’ petitions?
I’ll believe it when I see it.
* Watch the video. It’s even better…
Chicago News and Weather | FOX 32 News
35 Comments
|
Subsidy bills left undone
Wednesday, Dec 4, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* AP…
Illinois lawmakers have adjourned without approving bills proposing tax incentives for Archer Daniels Midland Company, chemical distributor Univar and newly-merged OfficeMax and Office Depot.
The Senate OK’d two bills Tuesday. One would give ADM up to $30 million in tax breaks. The other calls for roughly $58 million in incentives for Univar and OfficeMax.
However, the House adjourned after a pension vote.
* Speaker Madigan was asked yesterday to respond to ADM’s declaration that it needed a decision by the end of the year…
Q: On the ADM bill – you didn’t call that bill.
Madigan: “It’s still under consideration.”
Q: They’re saying they want an answer by the end of the year.
Madigan: “OK, well that’s nice.”
Heh.
* Meanwhile…
Also Tuesday, State lawmakers have adjourned without approving legislation supporters say would give the horse racing industry a needed boost.
Arlington International Racecourse officials said in a Tuesday statement that they’re disappointed.
Legislation allowing online betting on horse racing expires at January’s end. Race dates would be severely cut if legislators don’t renew the betting law and give Illinois’ racing board access to money wagering generates.
The plan renews the betting law for three years, calls for a surcharge on wagers and provides off-track betting licenses at parks.
A House committee approved legislation Monday. But it didn’t come up on the floor Tuesday as lawmakers approved major pension overhaul.
* More…
The legislature will have just one day to prove that it does because the current legislation allowing advanced deposit wagering is scheduled to elapse at midnight on Jan. 31, 2014, and the legislature is not scheduled to reconvene again until a one-day session on Jan. 29.
In the past, however, the legislature has set aside that day solely for the annual state of the State address and not convened to pass legislation.
If there is no action taken on the 29th, a doomsday scenario outlined by the Illinois Racing Board could kick in, one that would cut Arlington’s 2014 meet nearly in half and decimate the schedules of other thoroughbred and harness tracks around the state.
While it promises to be a nail-biting finish, Petrillo said Arlington and the racing industry as a whole will spend the next two months doing everything it can to improve the odds of getting the legislation passed.
12 Comments
|
Thankfully, a false alarm
Wednesday, Dec 4, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Tribune…
A Springfield fire official today said tests revealed baby powder was the suspicious white substance that fell out of an envelope in a building across from the Capitol.
Springfield Fire Chief Ken Fustin said officials will continue to investigate the matter because a letter also in the envelope indicated criminal intent, though he declined to reveal what the letter said.
The tests were done after an employee in the mail room of the governor’s constituent services office opened an envelope containing a letter and white powder fell out, Fustin said. The employees contacted emergency officials and a hazardous materials team was sent in, Fustin said.
* SJ-R…
The office that received the letter was the Governor’s Office of Citizen Assistance. That office receives the phone calls, e-mails and mail that the governor receives from the public.
The citizen assistance office is just one office in the building at 222 S. College St.
After the workers discovered the powder and called the fire department about 10:30 a.m., the ventilation system was turned off and workers in other offices were told to remain where they were.
About four or five workers that had contact with the letter were isolated.
Fustin declined to elaborate on what the letter said.
From what I was told, the powder was taken seriously, but much more so after the letter was read.
8 Comments
|
Maybe this can wait
Wednesday, Dec 4, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The very same columnist who broke the story about the expensive Statehouse copper doors wrote this without irony today…
For 30 years, I have seen the same old, same old in Springfield. At this time of year, workers climb onto the roof of the Capitol and string those multi-colored holiday lights.
It’s nice and everything, and it’s better than doing nothing, but those lights have gotten very, very old and tired. I am guessing that after so many years of this, people on the streets of Springfield glance at those lights, shrug because they have seen them so many times and then go on their way. That’s if they notice them at all anymore. […]
I suggest the state take a page from the Empire State Building. Put spotlights on the lower level of the Statehouse roof, point them at the Capitol dome and light it up. […]
The Illinois Capitol being a state government building, it’s not going to be used to promote private events, as is the Empire State Building. Everybody has their own cause to push and that can’t be accommodated. […]
Light up our Capitol dome for some national holidays and on 9/11 and on Lincoln’s birthday and other occasions deemed appropriate and non-controversial. I like the idea of lighting the Capitol dome in red, white and blue for July 4, Lincoln’s birthday, on the 200th anniversary of Illinois’ statehood in 2018 or for the annual Police Officers Memorial Day procession through Springfield.
But let’s take this idea a step further. The technology exists to project images onto objects even as huge as the Capitol dome. Why not project Lincoln’s image up there on his birthday and for other Lincoln events, such as the commemoration of the 150th anniversary of his burial in Springfield, taking place in 2015?
I actually like the idea.
But after the copper doors flap can you imagine the uproar if the state paid for all that?
18 Comments
|
Quinn’s big win, Dillard’s big gamble
Wednesday, Dec 4, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Sun-Times…
[The pension reform vote win] comes on the heels of Illinois in November becoming the 16th state to sign a bill legalizing same-sex marriage after just months earlier the Illinois House didn’t have the votes to even call the matter for a vote.
There’s no doubt the “ineffective governor” label once slapped on Quinn is starting to peel off.
A victory on pensions — aimed at boosting the state’s dismal fiscal shape — robs Republican rivals of their most powerful ammunition against the Democrat.
Already Tuesday, Madigan, D-Chicago, took a shot at Republican gubernatorial hopeful Bruce Rauner, who has repeatedly called the pension compromise a bad deal for taxpayers.
“I find Bruce Rauner to be particularly disingenuous in his approach to this. My view is he would like to blow it up so he could maintain a campaign issue,” Madigan said from the Statehouse Tuesday. “So the passage of the bill, the anticipated signature by the governor — Rauner has lost one of his campaign issues.”
* The Trib included a different take in its coverage…
Though Quinn is expected to take the credit for the pension measure, lawmakers acknowledged that it was the leaders of the General Assembly who drove the process. Cullerton, the Senate president, said the governor “did just barely enough” to help get the pension bill passed, but thanked Quinn for his support.
Quinn did more than just “barely enough.” He was crucial to the bill’s passage.
Cullerton doesn’t care for Quinn, didn’t want to pass the bill and wasn’t exactly elated with its passage…
“There’s some provisions in the bill that were added by the Republicans that make it less constitutional, there’s no question about that,” said Sen. John Cullerton, Illinois Senate President.
But, credit where credit is due, he worked the bill very hard.
* The pension problem is most certainly a major issue and it’s now off the table. But Illinois still has one of the highest unemployment rates in the nation, an unpopular tax increase set to expire in a little over a year, enormous remaining budget pressures, a continuing problem with past due bills and what looks to regular folks like calcified Democratic leadership.
In other words, Quinn ain’t outta the woods yet, campers.
* And neither is Sen. Kirk Dillard, who voted “No” even though he had voted for every other pension bill opposed by the unions…
Dillard said he locked himself in his law office to read the 300-plus paged bill and believes the vote on the matter was rushed.
“Sometimes it takes a couple of extra laps around the track before the race to begin,” Dillard said.
“I have never, never shied away from a difficult vote in the legislature. I can tell you that I’ve voted for tough pension reform before, I’m ready to do it again,” he said. “I’m ready to make that vote. I reluctantly, reluctantly rise against this.”
The decision comes after weeks of speculation that Dillard planned to vote against pension reform in hopes of maintaining a healthy relationship with organized labor. Dillard denied as much to the Sun-Times in the past.
* Mark Brown…
[Dillard’s] reasoning came across like a guy trying to justify a strategic political decision instead of as the bipartisan statesman he has long held himself out to be. It was especially inexplicable considering that his lieutenant governor running mate, Jill Tracy, supported the measure.
This was a day where you could see who was interested in standing up and being counted as a truly serious legislator.
* And it may not help. You’ll recall this poll I commissioned…
“Would you be more likely or less likely to vote for a Republican candidate for governor who received hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions from public employee unions?” 1,614 likely Republican primary voters were asked Aug. 21 in a Capitol Fax/We Ask America poll.
An overwhelming 80 percent said they’d be less likely to back such a candidate, while a mere 8 percent said they’d be more likely to do so.
23 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
* From a We Are One Illinois press release…
“This is no victory for Illinois, but a dark day for its citizens and public servants.
“Teachers, caregivers, police, and others stand to lose huge portions of their life savings because politicians chose to threaten their retirement security, rather than pass a much fairer, legal, negotiated solution in Senate Bill 2404.
“It’s bitterly ironic that, on the same day legislators used the state’s troubled finances to justify stealing the retirement savings of public servants, they approved millions of dollars in new tax giveaways for big corporations.
“A majority of legislators ignored and defied their oaths of office today—but Governor Pat Quinn doesn’t have to. He can stay true to his oath and the legal promise made to public employees and retirees by vetoing this unfair, unconstitutional bill. If he doesn’t, our union coalition will have no choice but to seek to uphold the Illinois Constitution and protect workers’ life savings through legal action.”
132 Comments
|
Rauner doubles down, pivots to economy
Wednesday, Dec 4, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From a Bruce Rauner press release…
“Springfield politicians [yesterday] voted to slap a small bandage on an open wound. While it may help them temporarily feel better, it does little to fix the real problems facing Illinois. The pension system remains broken and badly underfunded. State spending has never been higher, or less productive. Another tax hike is looming around the corner. State government is in desperate need of reform. Our economy continues to suffer, and far too many Illinoisans remain out of work. The fact is after decades of career politicians running things in Springfield, expectations of what Illinois can accomplish are far too low. We can and must do better. I’ll shake things up in Springfield and deliver results that will truly bring back Illinois.”
Notice that he’s now pivoting to things that aren’t easily solved by passing a single bill, like it was with pension reform.
46 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
|
Hosted by MCS
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax
Advertise Here
Mobile Version
Contact Rich Miller
|