Today’s quotables
Monday, Oct 21, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Former Mayor Daley is having “memory” problems, at least while he was deposed during a lawsuit over a politically and Daley family-connected restaurant contract in Millennium Park…
Novack: Do you recall asking them to move the bar from the front of the restaurant to the back of the restaurant because you thought that would be more family-friendly?
Daley: I don’t recall.
Novack: Do you recall that you actually attended the announcement of the opening of the restaurant?
Daley: I don’t recall if I did or not.
Novack: OK. I’ll show you . . . a picture of a bunch of people standing in front of some buildings. Do you recognize yourself in that picture?
Daley: It’s kind of blurry. I guess it’s me, if it is.
Novack: And you are there, aren’t you, for the opening of the ice rink . . . and the restaurant being open for the first time?
Daley: I don’t know what it was for, but — I don’t recall.
Novack: In other words, is it your testimony that the first time you knew that they [Horan and O’Malley] were associated with the restaurant was that day?
Daley: I don’t know what I knew.
A quick visit to a doctor might be in order. Or not.
* Bill Cameron reports on a speech given by Sen. Bill Brady…
“Don’t underestimate Pat Quinn. He may be a buffoon when it comes to leading and on policies, but he is brilliant when it comes to manipulating the populist card in a Democratic state,” Brady said.
Brady was in Oak Brook with Republican candidates for the Chamber of Commerce when he made the comments about Quinn.
Ouch.
* And speaking of Oak Brook, Treasurer Dan Rutherford was all upset this morning about the price of his conference hotel room…
OK, fine, dude, you worry about and even pick up pennies. But how many fundraising calls could you have made while you composed six outraged tweets today and monitored online feedback?
Sheesh.
* Let’s end on an up note. After a months-long refurbishing project, commuters are gushing about the Red Line, and for good reason…
The red line hasn’t moved this fast on the south side since 1969 when it first opened.
44 Comments  
|
Question of the day
Monday, Oct 21, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Aside from pension reform and gay marriage, there are some other issues coming up in the veto session and Jamey Dunn provides a quick rundown…
* Gambling expansion It seems unlikely that lawmakers will vote on a gaming bill during the veto session, but there is a House hearing on the topic scheduled for Wednesday. Quinn has not said that he would give a gaming bill the same treatment as an ADM tax break if it landed on his desk before pension reform. However, he has warned lawmakers in the past not get distracted by the “shiny object” of a gambling expansion when he feels they should be working to get pension changes passed. He has vetoed two gambling bills in the past and said last year that he could only approve one if it had strict regulations and the money went to education.
* Budgetary issues Several House budget committees are holding hearings on potential supplemental appropriations. It is the time of year when agencies tend to come to lawmakers looking to patch budget holes. Union leaders may also be seeking an appropriation for workers’ back pay from raises there were promised but did not receive. Quinn’s budget staff has said that workers should get the money under a new deal the state made with the unions. However, House Speaker Michael Madigan seems less than warm to the idea. Since there are no bills drafted and in committee, it seems more likely that such budget issues might be tackled in January. Quinn may also be reluctant to sign more spending unless pension changes pass. There is a bill for employee back pay, Senate Bill 2603. It had not been posted to an appropriations hearing as of Monday. Union officials are working to lobby lawmakers. “A circuit court judge has already ruled that the money must be paid. Now Gov. Quinn has agreed, too. But it is up to the state legislature to appropriate the funds that are needed,” says a call to action to its members from the American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees Council 31.
* Paint disposal One hearing that may lead to legislation down the road is scheduled for November 4. Lawmakers are looking to create a program to ensure that paint is properly disposed of in the state. Holmes, who sponsors the Paint Stewardship Act, said the committee is seeking input and hopes to get an end product that sellers and industry can agree to. Under such a plan, a small fee would be added to the cost of paint, and the money would be used to set up the program. Holmes cautions that the idea is still in a very early stage and could see major changes as the process continues. “What we want to do is have everyone on board with it,” she said.
* Retiree health care The Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability is scheduled to hold a hearing on state retiree health benefits on Wednesday morning.
* Other veto session preview stories…
* Quick facts about veto session agenda
* Lawmakers could face lively veto session — or not - Brauer expects ‘deadly dull’ two weeks
* 3 more knotty issues - Lawmakers also facing gun law, tax breaks, gambling
* Several gun rights bills could be considered during veto session
* Illinois Law Would Heavily Restrict Possession of Firearms Outside Home
* Timing hurdle to gay marriage vote - Sponsor still looking for support, but casting ‘yes’ vote now could bring lawmakers primary challenges
* Pro-Gay Marriage Rally Tuesday
* Black Pastors kick off pro-traditional marriage initiatives for veto session
* 2014 deadline among hurdles in lawmaker session
* Pension deal remains elusive - Politics still has upper hand as conference committee works out plan
* Casino vote unlikely in veto session
* Illinois racing faces its own fiscal cliff
* The Question: Why veto session proposal interests you most and why?
18 Comments
|
Decision doesn’t decide much in the long term
Monday, Oct 21, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* It may be only a temporary reprieve…
By avoiding the fundamental constitutional question, last week’s Illinois Supreme Court 6-1 ruling against the state’s “Amazon tax” has left the controversial issue of Internet sales taxes up to Congress or the U.S. Supreme Court to sort things out once and for all.
In other words: Don’t expect those Internet marketers that fled the state when the law was enacted two years ago to be flocking back anytime soon.
The state’s highest court found Illinois’ Internet sales tax void and unenforceable because it conflicts with a federal law that temporarily blocked new state or federal taxes aimed at online retailers or Internet providers, the first court in the country to take that stance. But others say a conflict with federal law merely makes the state tax unenforceable.
For unstated reasons, the court did not address a lower court ruling that found the state tax in violation of the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
* Courts usually try to keep their opinions narrow, so that may be why the Supremes acted the way they did. But the that federal law sunsets in a year. So, we end up right back where we started…
All of the justices sided with Burke except Justice Lloyd Karmeier, who wrote the dissenting opinions.
The court avoided the larger constitutional question of whether the tax is allowable under the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Karmeier argued that this was a mistake because he said that the issues will likely end up in court again.
“A new commerce clause challenge is certain to follow. A year from now we could therefore find ourselves in precisely the same position we are in today, facing the same commerce clause challenge brought by and against the very same litigants. The delay will have accomplished nothing. The issue has been fully briefed and argued and is ripe for a decision now. We should make one,” he wrote
So, if Congress fails to act, there would be no controlling federal statute to prohibit the state law, so it could take effect again.
3 Comments
|
Behind the semantics
Monday, Oct 21, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Senate President John Cullerton will undoubtedly set tongues wagging with his declaration yesterday that the pension funding issue is not really a “crisis”…
“People really misunderstand the nature of this whole problem. Quite frankly, I don’t think you can use the word ‘crisis’ to describe it at the state level,” Cullerton said in an interview on WGN-AM radio.
“It’s something we have to deal with, but it’s not something that we’re on the verge of bankruptcy on,” Cullerton said.[…]
Cullerton said that under a 1996 law aimed at gradually boosting the amount of money put into the state’s pension funds to eventually get them funded at 90 percent of their liability, payments to the retirement systems are already near their highest level and require only small annual future increases to stay on track. As a percentage of state general revenues, pension payments would continue to be about one-fifth of the state’s general revenues through 2044, his office said. As a percentage of state general revenues, pension payments would continue to be about one-fifth of the state’s general revenues through 2044, his office said. […]
“These pension (proposals) we’ve talked about will save annually anywhere from $750 million to $1.5 billion. So you’re still going to have real huge cuts that we’ll have to make if we don’t raise that income tax higher than what they’re scheduled to go down to,” he said.
* Cullerton’s mistake was attempting to argue semantics. He’s a lawyer, so that’s what they do. And since words matter to those most committed to this issue, the outrage will be utterly predictable. Reboot Illinois is already astonished that Cullerton would say such a thing…
For years, I have accepted as fact that Illinois’ ever-increasing pension costs (now consuming more than 20 percent of state revenue) constitute a crisis for state finances.
In general, I’d say a state that is $5.4 billion behind in paying its bills (as of this morning) and is devoting more than 20 percent of its budget to public employee pensions and has the second highest unemployment rate in the nation is in a state of financial crisis. I’d reinforce this point by noting that this is a state that in 2011 raised its income tax rate from 3 to 5 percent to pay down that bill backlog only to see virtually all the new money go toward required pension payments.
OK, once again, with feeling, legislators did not raise the tax rate solely to pay down the bill backlog. A small part of the tax hike was earmarked to pay interest and principal on borrowing that was supposed to be used to pay down the backlog, but that bond was never issued.
And as Cullerton rightly points out, we’re currently pretty much at the top of the pension payment ramp. So the “ever-increasing” rhetoric is just that.
* Either way, though, challenging a totally accepted media narrative ain’t ever easy and will usually fail without a lot of paid advertising behind it. Cullerton loves to do this sort of thing, but he would’ve been better off without trying to define some terms and focusing instead on the reality.
I mean, seriously, when is the last time you read a news story or an editorial that points out state pension payments are finally leveling off? So I’m betting that Cullerton’s needless semantics argument will be what everybody covers.
* But the reality is this: No pension reform currently under serious current consideration would save more than about $1.5-$1.8 billion a year for all but the last few years of the 30-year plan (it may be a little higher than Cullerton’s estimate). Not one. And while $1.5-$1.8 billion is most definitely a lot of money to take out of the state’s spending base, it doesn’t come close to the $5.4 billion budget hit from the partial expiration of the temporary income tax hike. And, of course, that assumes any new pension proposal will be declared constitutional - which is a big “if.”
So, even the harshest pension reform plan would only lower state payments by a four or five percentage points in relation to state revenues. The problem is apparently “solved” when 15-16 percent of annual General Revenues are going to pensions until 2044, but remains a crisis when the share is 20 percent?
On the other hand, allowing the state income tax hike to expire would impose a permanent 15 percent or higher hit on General Funds revenues in 2016, the first full year of the expiration. And yet the enormous “squeeze” felt by state programs from that event is barely mentioned at all by those pushing the hardest for pension reform.
Make no mistake, major pension reform would help the state absorb the hit from the loss of the tax hike revenues. But it’s still gonna be a huge freaking hit and will produce a far more intense budget “crisis” than the one produced by pension funding.
* The full Cullerton interview is here…
66 Comments
|
Common sense rule portrayed as somehow racist
Monday, Oct 21, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* A recent hyperventilating race-baiting column in The Guardian about Erika Harold’s primary challenge of freshman Republican Rodney Davis has set off something of a political firestorm in Illinois…
When it’s convenient to their diversity “story-telling”, the Republican National Committee loves black Republicans. After Mitt Romney got whacked in the 2012 presidential election because he ignored minority voters, the RNC pledge it would engage with minority voters and support more candidates of color.
To keep up appearances, the RNC hired a handful of blacks this year and featured the black Republican house speaker from Oklahoma, TW Shannon, as a speaker in its Rising Stars Program at the RNC’s summer meeting in Boston. But when it’s time to support actual black candidates in primaries against white candidates, the RNC treats black Republicans like the plague. […]
The former Miss America 2003 and Harvard Law School graduate, Harold had the audacity to challenge white, male, first-term Representative Rodney Davis in a GOP primary for Illinois’ 13th congressional seat – and is witnessing the party machine’s discrimination up-close and personal.
The Illinois Republican party refused to give Harold access to the GOP data center. Formerly called the “voter vault”, the data center is where the RNC stores voting information for all voters in the country, which it makes available to the 50 state parties for free. Candidates are given access to the database to target donors and voters.
In response to Harold’s request, the state central committee, which governs the Illinois GOP, issued a new policy at its 5 October meeting. The new policy stated that challengers to any Republican incumbent would not be given access to the voter database. However, the policy did permit county chairs to give access to county voter data at their own discretion.
How convenient for the white incumbent, Davis.
* Oh, please. This is not new. Yeah, it was recently formalized as policy by the Republican State Central Committee, but it’s a long-standing practice and it makes a lot of sense. The Champaign News-Gazette’s Tom Kacich explains it well. Emphasis added…
He said the vote formalized what had been a “longstanding policy. No challenger has ever had access,” said [15th Congressional District’s GOP committeeman].
Part of the reason, he said, is that some of the data was generated by the Davis campaign.
The information not only includes primary and general election voting records, but data on issues important to individual voters.
“Let’s say that you contact a voter and that voter is really concerned about gun control. You put a code next to that voter’s name about gun control and when you talk about gun control you target that voter,” Clarke explained.
Davis’ campaign would have input some of that information last year, said Clarke, who was among the candidates in the spring of 2012, along with Davis and Harold, for the nomination to become the Republican candidate for Congress in the 13th District. The county chairmen eventually chose Davis.
“We can’t give Davis’ opponent the information that he collected,” Clark said. “That’s why if it’s an open seat, they will give all Republicans access to the information. But if it’s a challenger running against an incumbent, they will not get access.
“If we did it the other way and gave Erika Harold access, she would be the first person to ever get access to somebody else’s data. And what would happen is that nobody would use the voter vault anymore.“
Clarke is right on all points.
* Unfortunately, members of the News-Gazette’s editorial board appear not to read their own paper...
It’s not personal, it’s business. The GOP already has an incumbent U.S. House member from the 13th District, U.S. Rep. Rodney Davis, and it’s not happy she’s rocking the boat by challenging him in the March 2014 primary election. They fear it might cost the party a congressional seat.
Party leaders most recently made their unhappiness known when the GOP’s state central committee voted unanimously to deny her access to the GOP’s “voter vault” database. That’s the inside information the party gathers on voters in the district and their political preferences.
They denied Harold the information because she’s running against Davis and told her she would have to seek the information she’s requesting from individual county party chairmen. One chairman, John Parrot of McLean County, requested his county’s voter information that is stored at party headquarters so he could pass it on to Harold. As of late last week, he said he has yet to receive a response.
Well, maybe Harold can’t get the information from individual county chairmen even though the state central committee representatives said she can. It wouldn’t be the first time people in politics haven’t told the truth.
Democracy is a beautiful concept, but politics can be an ugly business. Davis already has all the advantages — incumbency, a ton of campaign cash and the backing of most of the party people who matter. Party leaders didn’t send for Harold, and for now that’s why she’s not welcome.
21 Comments
|
Yet another “defining” issue?
Monday, Oct 21, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From a recent interview of Bruce Rauner…
I got so frustrated with the pace of school reform that I formed a PAC four years ago, and got a piece of legislation drafted, that took away tenure for ineffective teachers, took away the teachers’ ability to strike in Illinois because its a nuclear bomb on our taxpayers, and it’s a public safety issue for kids, and put in a rigorous school accountability system.
Got the bill drafted, it was pending in the legislature, Madigan, Daley - it was bi-partisan support, and we lost most of the bill. And you know who fought us the hardest in the legislature in the end when it got killed? Republicans in the legislature who take teacher union money.
This is the challenge we’ve got, but you know what? I’ve never taken a nickel from a government union boss, I can stand up to them. I don’t need their …I’m financially independent … I will take on the teacher’s union, AFSCME and SEIU. They’ve got a stranglehold on the state.
* Illinois Review followed up by checking some GOP campaign finance disclosures…
State Rep. Sandy Pihos received a $25,000 check from the IEA in September, just before she introduced legislation to reduce state educational grants going to Chicago schools. With a growing controversy over how Illinois education funds are distributed, the IEA, which represents the vast majority of Illinois’ teachers outside of Chicago, has millions at stake. Pihos is influential as the Republican spokesperson on the House Elementary & Secondary Education, as well as serving on the House Approp-Elementary & Secondary Education committees. […]
State Sen. David Luechtefeld, a former teacher, principal and high school basketball coach, is the Minority Spokesman on the Senate Education Committee. The IEA has given him over $115,000 in campaign donations over the years.
Other GOP lawmakers who have received at least $5,000 of support from the IEA include State Reps. Keith Sommer, Chad Hays, David Reis, Mike Bost, John Cavaletto, David Leitch, Adam Brown, Dan Brady, and Dennis Reboletti; and State Senators Dale Righter, Sam McCann, Chapin Rose, and DuPage County’s Kirk Dillard.
Dillard, who received $250,000 from teachers unions in his 2010 gubernatorial bid, is the only current Republican lawmaker to receive support from the radically left-wing Chicago Teachers Union.
* The IR’s conclusion…
The amount of money and diversity of recipients speaks to the depth and breadth of political influence the teachers unions have in the state. No matter who the governor is in 2015, one of their most formidable opponents will be the many teachers unions. Time will tell if a gubernatorial David will ever be able to fell this union goliath.
Time will also tell if Rauner can make support from public employee unions an effectively divisive issue in a GOP primary. Polling indicates that the idea has traction.
But does the Republican Party really need yet another issue that supposedly defines who is and who is not a “real” party member? And can anybody say with a straight face that Keith Sommer, Adam Brown, Dale Righter and Sam McCann (among all those others) aren’t “true” Republicans?
40 Comments
|
Hugh Hill
Monday, Oct 21, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* I grew up watching Hugh Hill on Channel 7. I had the opportunity to meet him when I first started out in the early 1990s. He did not disappoint. He asked pointed questions and often seemed to know more about what was going on behind the scenes than many of the reporters who worked the Statehouse full time, even with his occasional pre-broadcast naps in the pressroom kitchen.
Robert Feder has a great obit…
They don’t make reporters like Hugh Hill anymore.
A giant of Chicago journalism for 43 years, he practically invented the role of political reporter on local television news and played it longer and with more gusto than anyone.
Hill, who died Friday at 89, interviewed every U.S. president from Truman to Clinton and covered every Chicago mayor from Daley to Daley. His in-your-face style of interrogation and remarkable institutional memory made him a legend.
* Feder also ran some excerpts from a 1988 interview…
On the key to his success: “I get by because I know what I’m talking about. It’s been my life. I love the business of television news. I think knowledge is power in journalism as well as any other line. If you know more than the next guy, you’re better off, and you’re worth a lot more to the station or to the newspaper you’re working for, And I have more knowledge about the field of politics than anybody in journalism in Chicago. I have an uncanny memory and can remember a lot of things. And I do a hell of a lot of research and a lot of reading. I mean, I work hard.” […]
On working in a young person’s business: ”If there were something I could do that’s as much fun as broadcasting, then I’d go and retire to it. But there is no such thing. This is more fun than I could ever possibly hope for. Sure, it’s a job and you make good money. But I do it because I love it and I wouldn’t ever want to do anything else. It’s very, very tiring and exhausting physically. But mentally, it’s great. It’s an exercise in real journalism. It’s the essence of broadcast journalism.”
In most cities, TV news has always been little more than fluff. Chicago is different, particularly when I was growing up. My parents were always bemused at my fascination with Chicago TV news when I was still in grade school, but I think I recognized then how solid those broadcasts were. Fahey Flynn and Joel Daley were outstanding anchors, and I watched them whenever I could.
But Hugh Hill and Dick Kay (over at Channel 5) made an indelible mark on my young self. I once told that to Dick, but I was always a little intimidated by Hill, so I never got around to telling him what he meant to me growing up. I’m sorry for that now, but it just goes to show you what kind of man he was. People trembled in his wake.
He stomped on the terra.
17 Comments
|
The haves and have-nots
Monday, Oct 21, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* My weekly syndicated newspaper column…
Let’s take a quick look at the campaign finance disclosure reports filed last week by some statewide candidates, shall we?
Bill Brady — It goes without saying that the $66,104 Brady reported raising during the third quarter was beyond pathetic. But here’s how bad the Republican gubernatorial candidate’s performance really was — even Sheila Simon outraised him.
Simon, a notoriously poor fundraiser, pulled in more than $106,000 during the quarter. And if it wasn’t for the $200K in leftover funds from his 2010 governor’s race, Brady would’ve reported having just $73,000 at the end of the quarter. He also spent a bit more than he took in, which isn’t very difficult considering his paltry take.
Kirk Dillard — The burn rate in Dillard’s gubernatorial campaign fund is pretty significant. Dillard raised $263,000, but he spent $290,000 and ended the quarter with a mere $205,000 in the bank, the lowest of any other gubernatorial candidate.
That’s a big overhead nut to make with such a small cushion and poor fundraising.
Bruce Rauner — The multimillionaire Republican candidate for governor spent more than $27,000 just on payroll taxes during the third quarter, which gives you an idea of the sort of organization he has built. By comparison, Gov. Pat Quinn spent $19,000 on payroll taxes during the quarter, Dan Rutherford reported spending $11,000, Brady $1,609, and Dillard reported none.
Rauner also reported spending $800,000 on advertising, including direct mail, which is slightly less than he spent in the previous quarter. None of his opponents spent more than a few dollars on ads, and those were mainly small newspaper or online placements. Since he launched his campaign, Rauner has spent $274,000 on consultants, with $103,000 spent just last quarter. Rauner raised about $1.1 million for his campaign fund, spent the same and ended with $594,000 on hand.
Rauner’s political action committee, which is seeking a constitutional amendment on the ballot next year to impose legislative term limits, has paid $114,000 to a California firm called Arno Petition Consultants.
A California petition company called Arno Political Consultants has stirred quite a bit of controversy in the past with its petition-gathering practices, so we should keep an eye on that. Rauner’s term limits PAC also has spent $38,000 in legal fees and is renting space from a group called “Catholic Vote.”
The term limits PAC raised $606,000 during the quarter, spent $152,000 and had $459,000 in the bank.
Dan Rutherford — The Republican state treasurer reported raising $66,000 in small “unitemized” contributions for his governor’s race, more than any gubernatorial candidate in either party.
Unlike Dillard and Brady, Rutherford has built a solid statewide network to raise money from, so Rauner’s support by all the big-money types hasn’t really hurt Rutherford. He raised $337,000 during the quarter, spent $147,000 and had $1.2 million in the bank at the end of the quarter.
Pat Quinn — The governor is sitting on the largest war chest of any gubernatorial candidate at just under $3 million. His disclosure report also revealed that Quinn has put Joe Slade White back on the payroll.
White designed Quinn’s inexpensive-looking but effective 2010 general election ad campaign. White was paid $10K on Sept. 10, a week before Bill Daley dropped out of the Democratic race, so Quinn obviously was gearing up to run some ads against Daley. Quinn spent a total of $51,000 on consulting services and $34,000 on salaries during the quarter.
Tom Cross — The GOP state treasurer candidate opened up a new campaign account in September that pulled in $176,000 and reported no expenditures. Cross’ state representative fund reported $155,000 in receipts, $195,000 in expenditures and $150,000 in the bank.
Mike Frerichs — The Democratic state treasurer candidate raised $208,000 and had an impressive $769,000 cash on hand, more than three of the five gubernatorial candidates. The guy is a fundraising machine.
Judy Baar Topinka — The incumbent comptroller raised $105,000 during the quarter, about the same as her Democratic rival Simon. However, Topinka is sitting on $876,000, while Simon has $295,000 in the bank.
31 Comments
|
|
Comments Off
|
|
Comments Off
|
Caption contest!
Friday, Oct 18, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* AFSCME Council 31 Executive Director Henry Bayer has been reelected…
Henry is often ascerbic, but he’s unapologetically and unabashedly pro-union and has built one of the most impressive public employee organizations in the country.
* Let’s congratulate Henry on his reelection with a little caption contest, shall we?…
35 Comments
|
Fun with numbers
Friday, Oct 18, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* This would be very troubling if true…
State Sen. Dave Luechtefeld (R-Okawville), is voicing concern over increasing violence in the state’s Department of Corrections, noting the number of inmate-on-staff assaults are up more than 20 percent in the most recent fiscal year that ended June 30.
“530 officers and other frontline staff were assaulted during Fiscal Year 2013, that number is a sharp increase from the previous 428. By looking at the Department’s figures we also see that this is the highest number of hits since FY 2004,” Luechtefeld said. “Our primary concern is for the staff at these institutions and we will remain steadfast in our support of their safety and ensuring that our correctional centers do not revert back to a more turbulent and violent time.”
Using the Illinois Department of Correction’s (IDOC) own numbers, Luechtefeld found the number of inmate-on-staff assaults at the state’s correctional centers is at the highest rate of assaults in 10 years.
* There are big problems with this analysis, however. According to Corrections, they count assaults differently today than they did in FY2004. Back then, minor things like spitting on a guard were not listed as assaults. Now they are. IDOC also has two classifications of assaults, regular and “serious.” The “serious” assaults are similar to what they counted as assaults ten years ago. Also, there are more inmates now than back then.
* IDOC’s full response…
Serious assaults on staff in Illinois prisons were down in FY13 and serious assaults of all types were down 35 percent in the same period. As for the FY13 overall assault total being “…highest since FY04,” please keep in mind we now have 10.5 percent more inmates than 10 years ago.
Most important, unlike FY04, IDOC now chooses to classify even very minor physical occurrences such as spitting, throwing food or an I.D. as an assault if they so much as touch a guard’s shoe. Also, when guards break up inmate fights, that could be an assault on staff. All of this inflates assault numbers.
Why do we practice these classifications? Because it increases safety and security by creating an atmosphere of zero tolerance. Inmates know that even the slightest behavior issue will hurt their earned time. Calling them out on small matters keeps them in line, which is why overall serious assaults are down 35 percent. By the way, inmate-on-inmate serious assaults were down 51 percent from FY12 to FY13.
Regarding Pontiac Correctional Center, only 21 percent of assaults there (75 of 345) over the past three calendar years were serious. As for former Tamms inmates, it will take some time to individually check each of those 345 mostly minor incidents, but according to the Warden, an Assistant Warden and numerous staff at Pontiac, former Tamms inmates are no more involved in assaults than are other inmates. In fact, early indications show they are less involved.
4 Comments
|
Websites behaving badly
Friday, Oct 18, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* I’m not the only one with site problems today. Steve Rhodes…
The Sun-Times website has been driving me crazy for weeks now, as it frequently does, by freezing my browser as it loads . . . and loads . . . and loads. I don’t know if they’re running some hellacious script over there, but I’m not going back for awhile.
The Tribune and the Sun-Times websites were both crashing my browsers today. Insane.
* Also, Gatehouse’s awful pop-under which displays their “Up to the Minute” page has got to be revamped. It causes a huge memory leak that inevitably crashes my browser if I don’t close it right away. I cannot tell you how many incomplete blog posts I’ve lost because of that stupid page.
A week or two ago, I woke up in the morning to find that everything on my computer was unbelievably slow. I finally realized that one of those moronic “Up to the Minute” pages had been left open all night. I have a Mac. It takes a lot to stop a Mac. But Gatehouse (SJ-R, PJStar, RRStar, etc.) routinely does so. Enough, already.
Hey, if I want to see a site’s latest posts, I’ll just refresh my browser, OK? Stop causing harm.
* And while I’m at it, my paid Crain’s subscription works fine on my home computer, but their site won’t let me access their subscriber content on my laptop. Ugh!
* Are there any particularly nasty website problems out there that you’d like to talk about?
25 Comments
|
* Back in 2011, the governor and all four legislative leaders signed on to a bill pushed by the Illinois Retail Merchants Association. The idea was to protect physical retailers from being undercut by online retailers who don’t charge sales taxes. It flew out of both chambers and was quickly signed into law.
Here’s a basic summary of the law from an Illinois Supreme Court ruling today which struck the statute down…
(O)ut-of-state internet retailers and servicemen are required to collect state use tax if they have a contract with a person in Illinois who displays a link on his or her website that connects an Internet user to that remote retailer or serviceman’s website. There is no requirement under the Act that sales be made to Illinois residents to subject the out-of-state retailer or serviceman to Illinois use tax obligations, and there is no requirement that the computer server hosting the Illinois affiliate’s website be located in Illinois. Both new definitions are limited, however, to referral contracts that generate over $10,000 per year.
As a result, Amazon immediately announced that it was ending its Illinois affiliate program and many of those larger affiliates fled to other states.
* All for naught, however. The Court’s conclusion…
The parties’ joint stipulation of facts states that an Internet affiliate does not receive or transmit customer orders, process customer payments, deliver purchased products, or provide presale or postsale customer services. Further, an Internet affiliate displaying a link on its website does not know the identity of Internet users who click on the link, and after a user connects to the retailer’s website, the affiliate has no further involvement with the user.
It is clear, therefore, that there is no interaction between an affiliate and a customer, and no “active” solicitation occurs on the part of the Internet affiliate. The click-through link makes it easier for the customer to reach the out-of-state retailer, but the link is not different in kind from advertising using promotional codes that appear, for example, in Illinois newspapers or Illinois radio broadcasts.
In short, under the Act, performance marketing over the Internet provides the basis for imposing a use tax collection obligation on an out-of-state retailer when a threshold of $10,000 in sales through the clickable link is reached.
However, national, or international, performance marketing by an out-of-state retailer which appears in print or on over-the-air broadcasting in Illinois, and which reach same dollar threshold, will not trigger an Illinois use tax collection obligation. The relevant provisions of the Act therefore impose a discriminatory tax on electronic commerce within the meaning of the [federal Internet Tax Freedom Act].
The federal law referenced in the opinion expressly prohibits “discriminatory taxes on electronic commerce.”
*** UPDATE *** From IRMA…
“It’s disappointing that the Illinois Supreme Court did not address the constitutionality of the issue, but rather erred in its conclusion that the act violated the Internet Tax Freedom act.
“We haven’t given up. There are other avenues for appeal we hope the state will take.
“This underscores the need for action in Washington to quickly pass the Marketplace Fairness Act.
“Working with a hodgepodge of laws around the country is intolerable, and brick and mortar retailers continue to be at a substantial disadvantage to their online competitors.”
13 Comments
|
* Daily Herald…
A new conservative group will meet Saturday in Lake County to talk to potential primary challengers to Republican state Rep. Ed Sullivan of Mundelein, one of three Illinois Republicans who have pledged to vote for same-sex marriage.
The meeting is being arranged by Illinois Families First, a Chicago-based political action committee led by conservative Paul Caprio, who on Wednesday called Sullivan a “Cadillac representative of everything that is wrong with this state.”
Caprio said the group will be prepared to spend a lot of money to defeat Sullivan in a Republican primary but won’t coordinate with the potential candidate, possibly setting up a high-profile battle over same-sex marriage in the suburbs. […]
“I’m willing to lose my job over this issue,” Sullivan said Wednesday. “But it won’t be without a fight.”
Rep. Sullivan says on his Facebook page that the candidate will likely be Bob Bednar of Mundelein. Bednar won a primary last year for Lake County Recorder of Deeds, but got stomped 59-41 in the general.
If you have some time, go to Sullivan’s FB page and check out the flame war in his comments. Wow.
* In other Sullivan-related news, Caprio’s Illinois Families First has been spending cash against Rep. Sullivan. From the Twitters…
* I told subscribers about this earlier in the week…
State Sen. Kirk Dillard of Hinsdale says there’s no relation between a $12,300 donation his campaign for governor made to the conservative Family PAC and an effort by the group’s director, Paul Caprio, to find a primary election opponent for Republican state Rep. Ed Sullivan of Mundelein.
Caprio has vowed to work against Sullivan, who supports same-sex marriage.
The late-September donation from Dillard is labeled as “marriage telemarketing/grassroots” in campaign records. Dillard spokesman Wes Bleed says the money was to be used to help the campaign network with Family PAC supporters and not to work against Republican candidates.
That’s not the explanation that Caprio gave me, but whatever.
Dillard raises almost no money, yet he still finds a way to give $12,300 to Caprio’s group. Priorities, priorities.
25 Comments
|
Quinn again shuts off UNO money
Friday, Oct 18, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Sun-Times…
For the second time this year, Gov. Pat Quinn has suspended state funding to the scandal-scarred United Neighborhood Organization, the biggest charter-school operator in Illinois.
A Quinn spokeswoman said Thursday the state has frozen the final $15 million of a $98 million state school-construction grant that the Illinois Legislature promised UNO in 2009 to help build a network of charter schools.
“As a result of our own internal review conducted earlier this year, we have not approved any new projects, and we have suspended future capital projects,” spokeswoman Sandra M. Jones said. […]
Quinn restored the state funding in early June, saying he was confident UNO had implemented reforms, including the appointment of a new board chairman. Longtime UNO boss Juan Rangel stepped down as board chairman but has remained as the charter operator’s $250,000-a-year chief executive. Rangel served as Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s 2011 campaign co-chairman.
Less than three weeks after the state restored funding, Quinn’s Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity — which oversees the grant — got a letter from the SEC requesting documents about UNO.
* Quinn had cited the appointment of Martin Cabrera Jr. as the reason why he restored funding. Cabrera is a close ally and business partner of powerful Chicago Ald. Ed Burke, who personally asked Quinn to restore UNO’s funding. Burke was a major contributor to Quinn’s 2010 campaign.
But Cabrera Capital Markets, which Martin Cabrera founded and runs, was one of two underwriters for a $37.5 million 2011 UNO bond issue. And when the SEC came calling, Cabrera beat a retreat and abruptly resigned as UNO’s chairman.
Cabrera Capital Markets has become a major national player. The company has nine office locations, including NYC and LA, and it was one of Facebook’s underwriters for the social network’s 2012 IPO.
* Needless to say, an SEC investigation into a bond deal for a charter school outfit which has gazillions of political ties to every major Democratic political player in this state could turn out to be very enlightening indeed.
However, allow me once again to complain about the federal government’s priorities here. We get an SEC investigation into a relatively minor bond deal, while the banksters who shoved the world’s economy off a cliff are still walking free. And while the US Attorney for southern Illinois uses the Sherman Antitrust Act to shut down and prosecute a Metro East tax sales ring, the Justice Department refuses to even consider the possibility of prison for the eager, knowing and willing participants in the greatest financial scam the planet has ever seen.
I’m not complaining about the local investigations one bit. I just wonder why it’s always the little fish who are targeted, while the monster fish swim away.
19 Comments
|
Davis’ lead grows over Harold
Friday, Oct 18, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Harold could destroy her political future if she winds up getting thumped this badly next March…
A recent poll of Republican voters in the 13th Congressional District gives incumbent Rep. Rodney Davis a 4-to-1 lead over his Republican challenger, Urbana attorney Erika Harold.
The poll of 859 Republicans, taken Oct. 10, showed that Davis was the choice of 63.15 percent of the likely Republican voters, to 15.95 percent for Harold. About 21 percent of those polled were undecided. The poll had a margin of error of plus or minus 3.34 percent.
A poll taken exactly four months earlier, on June 10, by the same Springfield polling firm, We Ask America, found that Republicans favored Davis, 53.55 percent to 16.38 percent.
“This is going to be a very tough road for a challenger in a Republican primary,” said Gregg Durham, the CEO of We Ask America. “Republicans seem to be favoring the incumbent, and for a challenger with limited means who is not willing to throw bombs — I think she’s more or less said she’s going to run a positive campaign — absent a major scandal, it’s hard to find a path to success for her.” […]
“I wouldn’t suggest right now that these will be the final numbers,” he said of the poll, “but I would suggest that I’ve never seen someone with these type of numbers win, absent a major scandal.”
Durham is spot on.
28 Comments
|
Illiana approved
Friday, Oct 18, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Daily Herald…
Amid a split among suburban leaders, the controversial Illiana Expressway received a shot in the arm Thursday when a planning board endorsed the road, marking a significant political victory for Gov. Pat Quinn.
The Illiana is a proposed tollway linking I-55 in the south suburbs with I-65 in Indiana that would be built as a public-private partnership. While Quinn and the Illinois Department of Transportation are backing it as a vital piece of infrastructure, the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning warns it will cost taxpayers up to $1.1 billion.
CMAP’s powerful Metropolitan Planning Organization policy committee voted 11 to 8 in favor of putting the roadway on the GO TO 2040 plan, which now makes it eligible for federal funding. The MPO includes county board chairman, transit agencies and transportation industry representatives.
* Tribune…
The toll road through Will County would connect Interstate 55 at Wilmington, I-57 near Peotone and I-65 near Lowell, Ind. Supporters said it would create 9,000 short-term jobs and generate thousands more over the next three decades.
In a separate vote, the Policy Committee also gave IDOT the authority to spend more than $80 million for more engineering and land acquisition. IDOT has already spent about $40 million in planning work on the project. […]
Voting in favor of the Illiana were the county chairmen or their representatives from Will, DuPage, Kane, Kendall and Lake counties, along with officials from the Illinois Tollway, Metra and Pace.
Opponents included representatives from Cook and McHenry counties, the city of Chicago and the CTA and the Regional Transportation Authority.
The RTA has, as a matter of routine, dissed the south suburbs for years on transit projects. Now its hostility has extended to privately backed toll roads. Sheesh.
* What’s next…
Now, the project is set to go out to bid in early November, according to Illinois Transportation Secretary Anne Schneider, who chairs the policy committee. The state is looking for proposals from investment firms that are partnered with engineering and contracting companies.
Schneider said the Federal Highway Administration also needs to approve environmental studies before construction begins on the highway, which she hopes will happen by the end of 2014 or early in 2015.
* However, litigation is almost guaranteed…
Chicago’s Environmental Law and Policy Center, an Illiana foe, is “reviewing all of our legal options,” according to deputy executive director Kevin Brubaker.
20 Comments
|
Question of the day
Friday, Oct 18, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* SJ-R…
Proponents of a gay marriage bill said Wednesday they want to see the legislation addressed during the General Assembly’s veto session that begins next week.
However, they would not discuss specifics of how many votes they believe there are for the bill in the Illinois House after a summer-long effort to build support.
“We don’t comment publicly on roll call,” John Kohlhelpp, campaign manager for Illinois Unites for Marriage, told The State Journal-Register editorial board. “We take that from our sponsor (Rep. Greg Harris, D-Chicago). He says we are within striking distance.” […]
[Rep. Kelly Cassidy, D-Chicago] said it is imperative that Illinois legalize gay marriage “to address the harm that’s been done since we failed to pass in the spring and the world changed when the (federal) defense of marriage act was struck down.”
* The Question: Should the sponsors bring the gay marriage bill to the House floor for a 3rd Reading vote even if they’re not sure if they have enough votes to pass it? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please.
survey hosting
And if the poll gets freeped like the last one on this topic, I’ll just shut it down and we’ll rely solely on commenters.
54 Comments
|
And we’re back
Friday, Oct 18, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* According to my web hosting guys, my server became corrupted last night. They’re not sure how yet, but this being Illinois I’m guessing corruption is everywhere and the possibilities are almost infinite.
Anyway, here’s an #OscarThePuppy video to tide you over while I get a post together. Oscar isn’t supposed to play with newspapers because he shreds them, but they’re one of his favorite things. He usually does really well with the “Drop it” command when it comes to his toys, but not so much with newspapers, as you’ll see…
…Adding… A recent aftermath of Oscar’s love for newspapers and magazines…
Heh.
39 Comments
|
* One of the more over the top fundraising appeals I’ve ever seen. From the Illinois Family Institute. Emphasis added…
As a father of six children, I often wonder what Illinois will be like in twenty years. What will it be like for your children and grandchildren?
We cannot know for sure. We can’t predict the future. Only God knows for certain.
I do know, however, that things are sure to be worse, much worse for our children, if we don’t do something now to stop the moral collapse, which will be hastened if our lawmakers undermine marriage by legalizing same-sex “marriage.”
I am doing everything in my power to prevent that from happening. I’ve put tens of thousands of miles on my car and logged weeks away from my family to fight this evil agenda in 2013, and I need your help today.
I’m not alone in making sacrifices. Many courageous people are stepping up and doing their part, including the staff and a dozen or so dedicated volunteers at IFI. I need you to do your part today.
The Chicago Sun Times admitted this week that Leftists are still “shy” of the votes they need to pass homosexual “marriage.” And that is because you have refused to stay silent. Now we must finish what we started earlier this year. We must show up in Springfield again. The politicians need to know how strongly you feel about this attack on common sense, reason, and decency. They have to understand that marriage redefinition isn’t as popular as some politicians and media pundits want you to believe it is.
And our politicians need to know that we aren’t going to allow them to ignore the best interests and rights of children and individual religious liberties without a fight. I can do no less for my children. It is my duty. It is our duty.
A friend told me about a group of WWII veterans from Iowa that drove all the way to Washington D.C. this week. They risked arrest by passing through the barricades set up by the president to keep veterans from viewing their monuments. We should be inspired to defend marriage with the same courage, conviction, tenacity, and sacrifice that the greatest generation fought to defend American principles and to honor their fallen. If we don’t stop the enemy from achieving his goal of destroying the family, there won’t be any monuments to visit. America will collapse. It is only a matter of time. Read Genesis 19.
I need your help today to continue the fight against this anti-family agenda. It takes a lot of money to pay staff, keep the bills paid, maintain our full-time office, host Pastors’ Breakfasts, travel to every part of the state, run ads, send out mailings, produce a timely and relevant website, and organize a huge Lobby Day(s). In just one week the October 23rd Lobby Day will be over. The bills won’t wait for next week.
And the truth is, the bills are mounting, and they must be paid.
We don’t get any money from the government or from the mega-rich like our adversaries do. We rely on the Holy Spirit moving in the hearts of his people: moms and dads, grandmothers, and grandfathers from all across the state.
Would you show your support for this cause and our work. Would you take a couple of minutes to make an online contribution?
Maybe you cannot be in Springfield next Wednesday.
You can make a donation.
I don’t hesitate in asking for your financial support. I am not ashamed. I’d beg you for your support if that would help. This cause is that important to me, and the Illinois Family Institute is that effective.
I know it is important to you as well. Please help your Illinois Family Institute remain strong in this fight.
Thanks for not delaying in making your contribution.
God be with you and with the great state of Illinois.
David E. Smith, Executive Director
Illinois Family Institute
* Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth, a new Fako & Associates poll has been released in Demcratic Rep. John D’Amico’s Northwest Side district. D’Amico tells Mark Brown he’s still undecided…
A new poll commissioned by Illinois Unites for Marriage Equality indicates D’Amico’s constituents — at least those likely to vote in a Democratic primary — strongly support legalizing same-sex marriage with 66 percent in favor compared to only 24 percent against.
The poll of 351 likely Democratic voters, conducted by Lisle-based Fako & Associates, has a margin of error of plus or minus 5 percentage points.
You always have to consider the source with any poll, although D’Amico conceded this one appears legitimate.
Still, D’Amico did not sound persuaded by the results, especially with the poll’s concentration on Democratic voters.
D’Amico said he’s “got a whole district to represent,” not just those who take a Democratic ballot.
“I’ve seen a lot of numbers thrown at me,” he said. “I’m trying to feel it out for myself.”
D’Amico said he expects to rely more on “my own unscientific poll, talking to people.”
D’Amico is Mayor Emanuel’s floor leader, so he’s under extreme pressure to vote for the bill.
45 Comments
|
Big vote today on Illiana Expressway
Thursday, Oct 17, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Mayor Rahm Emanuel talks about his opposition to the privately financed Illiana Expressway…
Emanuel said he doesn’t consider the project a benefit. “I don’t see Illiana as in the self-interest of the city of Chicago, from a competitive standpoint,” he said last week. Emanuel did not elaborate, but experts point to the importance of the thriving and competitive freight industry in Chicago and the surrounding region.
Not to mention O’Hare and Midway because of the proposed expressway’s proximity to Peotone. Chicago mayors have always guarded O’Hare, but keep in mind that Emanuel is attempting to privatize Midway, and that’ll probably be more difficult if a third airport is a likely prospect.
* A key vote is expected later today…
The final decision will come this evening. That’s when a little-known but powerful panel, the Policy Committee of the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning, is scheduled to vote on whether to endorse the proposed Illiana Expressway, moving it to the top of the region’s transportation priorities, or to place the south suburban road in a lower category, something that would make it ineligible for federal funding and likely kill it.
At this point, neither side appears to have a win sewn up. As of last night, one well-placed observer had it eight votes in favor, eight against and three undecided. In other words, a dead heat, depending on who actually shows up.
* Sen. Mark Kirk recently penned an op-ed in favor of the expressway…
Public-private partnership procurements are complicated. They take time to put together, with significant input from private industry regarding their structure and terms. Halting the Illiana Expressway’s progress now eliminates this option.
It may be that the market determines that the highway is not a good investment. If that is the case and the project does not make financial sense, then it should not move forward. To be sure, managing financial risk to the taxpayer should be the No. 1 priority for any public-private partnership.
But expecting a ready-made deal before a project is allowed to pursue private investment is a recipe for failure and hamstrings the very innovation that public-private partnerships promise.
Our infrastructure in Illinois is aging, and we don’t have the resources to keep up with demand. The Illiana Expressway is an opportunity to explore a new way to address how we invest in transportation, and one that I am excited to see move forward.
* My buddy Greg Hinz is an ardent Illiana foe and had this to say to Kirk…
Mr. Kirk really does run the risk of badly tarnishing his green shield. Building roads to nowhere to suck jobs and people out of the central area is antithetical to everything good urban planning ought to be about.
And throwing around money we don’t have — hey, Senator, remember all those speeches you made about how Illinois is bankrupt? — won’t impress any true fiscal conservative.
I seriously doubt that if the investors take a pass that the road will be built. But investor interest is reportedly quite strong, so I’m not too worried about costs. And this is a toll road, remember.
* Greg and I have shared e-mails back and forth about the Illiana, and this was a main contention of his that he also wrote about in his blog…
Above and beyond that is the fact that not only CMAP’s integrity but also the core future of the Chicago area is at stake in this decision. For once, the area has an agency that is trying to prioritize spending decisions so that the most needed projects get the money. But if Mr. Quinn gets his way on this one, the message will go out loud and clear that the bad old days are back, that dividing up the government pie is a free-for-all without rules in which every side just leans on their favorite pol to get their way.
You gotta admit, Mark Kirk and Pat Quinn make an odd couple. Even in Illinois. Just what are you up to, Senator?
…Adding… An insider with some knowledge of the roll call says he believes the pro-Illiana forces have lined up 11 votes. Ten are needed to win. Stay tuned.
41 Comments
|
Question of the day
Thursday, Oct 17, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The DuPage Convention & Visitors Bureau is running a sweepstakes…
Just 20 miles west of Chicago, DuPage County is less than a day’s drive from more than half the nation’s population—making it an ideal destination for a weekend road trip.
DuPage County can be beautiful in fall and winter, and we offer lots of seasonal activities, unique events, value-added hotel packages, and special discounts and deals to make your trip especially enjoyable.
Come and discover a road trip that’s just your style in DuPage County, Chicago’s western suburbs!
DuPage Weekend Road Trip Sweepstakes
Enter to win a DuPage County weekend sponsored by the DuPage Convention & Visitors Bureau and its partners:
* A $500 BP gas card
* A “car care” basket full of goodies
* An overnight stay, breakfast and spa credits at the luxurious Hotel Arista in Naperville, Illinois
One lucky winner will be selected from all entrants after our sweepstakes ends on March 31, 2014.
* The fine print…
Prizes have no cash value. No transportation provided. Prizes to be awarded by the DuPage Convention & Visitors Bureau (DCVB) and its partners. The DCVB may substitute a prize of equal or greater value, solely at its discretion. Any taxes, duty or extra fees are the responsibility of the winner. Prize package must be used by March 31, 2015, unless otherwise specified by awarding business.
* The Question: What would you do in DuPage County if you were the “one lucky winner”?
63 Comments
|
Shutdown wrap-up
Thursday, Oct 17, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* I’ve read quite a bit of coverage about the deal to end the government shutdown and avoid hitting the debt ceiling. Lots of stories focused on the possiblity that this could happen again next February. I highly doubt it. From Government Executive…
The measure also extends the nation’s ability to borrow—which the administration said would be exhausted Thursday—through Feb. 7. The Treasury Department will be permitted to use extraordinary measures to borrow after that date, if it needs to, which could extend the deadline. There’s also a mechanism for Congress to vote in favor of a “motion to disapprove” any increase the president announces, but Obama can veto that and force an override effort.
No way will both chambers pass a motion to disapprove.
At least on the borrowing limit aspect, this was a complete defeat of the tea party Republicans.
* Illinois may actually get some jobs out of the bill…
Buried in the Senate bill to end the partial government shutdown and raise the debt ceiling is a provision to nearly quadruple funding for an Ohio River dam project, an allocation slammed as “disgraceful” by Republican Sen. John McCain.
The dam project, which was approved in 1988, has drastically soared over its original budget of $775 million, and the new bill will raise its funding to nearly $3 billion.
Supporters of the project, called the Olmsted Locks and Dam, say it is necessary to reduce bottlenecking at the crossing of the Ohio and Mississippi rivers. Despite being approved over 20 years ago, the project is still described as “under construction between Illinois and Kentucky” on the Army Corps of Engineers’ website.
Nothing like a little pork for the Senate Minority Leader to grease the wheels of government.
Heh.
* While most House Republicans voted against the compromise bill, just one Illinois Republican voted “No”…
Rep. Randy Hultgren, an Illinois Republican backed by the tea party, said Wednesday that the confrontation leading to a partial government shutdown had left him with “disappointment and frustration” because Congress could have acted to tame the national debt “and the reality is, we didn’t do anything.”
Hultgren, 47, a Republican from DuPage County, spoke with the Tribune before casting the only “no” vote in the Illinois delegation on a bipartisan deal to reopen the government and avert default.
“Overall, I had no desire to see the government shut down, no desire to see our debts not paid, but I am very concerned about the larger picture: $17 trillion in debt and significant increases in new entitlement programs and debt that will only increase taxes on my constituents,” the second-term congressman said. […]
State Sen. Jim Oberweis, an investment manager and dairy magnate from Sugar Grove, is the GOP state central committeeman for the 14th District. He said Hultgren had “done a good job,” and he would be surprised if a Republican challenged the two-term congressman in 2014.
There are lots of rumors that Joe Walsh has switched gears and was thinking about challenging the lackluster fundraiser Hultgren in the GOP primary. We’ll see how this vote impacts the future there.
* Freshman Republican Congressman Rodney Davis voted for the bill…
Republican Rep. Rodney Davis said that while he opposes the president’s health care law, the shutdown that furloughed as many as 800,000 workers was “absolutely unacceptable.”
He said a default would have had “disastrous effects on an already-fragile economy.”
* And that could mean trouble if tea party groups like FreedomWorks follow through on their threats…
The President and CEO of the tea party group Freedomworks predicted that House Republicans who vote in favor of the latest plan to avert a debt default and re-open the federal government, will face primary challengers.
“Absolutely,” Freedomworks CEO and President Matt Kibbe said on CNN when asked if House Republicans would pay a “political price” for voting for the plan. “You’re seeing that and a repopulation of the republican party.”
There have been some reports that FreedomWorks has money troubles, but that’s not a unanimous consensus by any means.
If there is cash available, that could be the best news to come Erika Harold’s way since she launched her primary campaign against Davis earlier this year. She can’t raise money on her own, but maybe an outside group will ride to her rescue.
* Related…
* Treasurer Rutherford: Federal default threat a wash for Illinois finances: But with the federal default looming, Rutherford said his office moved about $1.2 billion out of treasury bills and into other investments such as repurchase agreements, money market accounts and commercial paper. Rutherford said there were concerns about how quickly the state could get the money back in the event of a default. “We looked at other instruments to still draw interest, but which were secure,” he said. “The other instruments were actually up in the market, so it allowed us the opportunity to at least equal, if not to the penny, very close to the penny equal the U.S. treasuries.”
30 Comments
|
A solution needs to be found
Thursday, Oct 17, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* University of California at Berkeley professor Franklin Zimring’s Sun-Times op-ed denouncing the University of Chicago’s Crime Lab analysis of the mandatory minimum sentencing proposal for illegal gun possession has been getting quite a bit of play. Several readers have asked why I haven’t posted the piece.
I simply thought it was too emotional, too focused on a personal attack and lacking in specific reasons why the Crime Lab analysis was wrong. Go read it yourself.
* Jens Ludwig at the Crime Lab has penned a response. Read it in full for a point by point rebuttal of Zimring’s attacks. I found this to be most interesting…
Among all cases where there was a conviction for an aggravated UUW charge in Chicago from 2003 through 2012, on average 43% were sentenced to probation and another 10% were sentenced to boot camp, community service, or “other.” Put differently, fewer than half are sentenced to jail or prison over this time period.
The data do show that the share of aggravated UUW cases receiving probation, boot camp, community service or “other” declined from 2003 to 2012. But it’s still the case that as of 2012, one-third (33%) of aggravated UUW cases receive a sentence of something other than time in jail or prison.
Analysis by the Illinois Sentencing Policy Advisory Council claims that the average length of stay in the Illinois Department of Corrections (DOC) for aggravated UUW cases that do get sent to prison is one-third of a year for people convicted of their first aggravated UUW offense, and 1.15 years for those convicted for at least the second time.
We can debate all day about first time offenders. Set them aside for now.
* But there is no doubt that 1.15 years for repeat offenders is ridiculously low. I mean, you get convicted for Aggravated Unlawful Use of a Weapon and then busted and convicted again and serve a year?
Prosecutors are to blame for this, as are judges, as are laws. A fix is in order.
* Ludwig’s conclusion…
Mandatory minimums may or may not be the best way to overcome the natural human tendency to focus on the after-the-fact outcome of some risky behavior, rather than on the risky behavior itself. But everyone concerned about the massive social costs that gun violence imposes on the most disadvantaged neighborhoods in Illinois should be in agreement that we need to figure out some way to increase the certainty of some sort of sanction for the very high-risk behavior of illegal gun carrying.
Agreed.
10 Comments
|
These guys are everywhere
Thursday, Oct 17, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* So, I’ve been listening to the Joe Walsh interview of Bruce Rauner while I was looking for other stories to post and heard something quite interesting. Walsh’s show is sponsored by the Illinois Policy Institute.
They have their own columnist, their own news service, their own “think tank,” tons of Statehouse lobbyists and now they’re sponsoring Joe Walsh’s radio program. “Ubiquitous” is a word that comes to mind.
…Adding… From Joe Walsh…
RIch,
clarification: the Illinois Policy Institute is not a sponsor of the Joe Walsh show.
They are only sponsoring the October Governor Candidate Townhall Series.
thanks,
Joe
* In reality, though, Walsh’s interview was by far the best, most comprehensive I’ve ever heard of Bruce Rauner. He’s actually quite good at this. I’m now a fan. No joke. Listen to the show yourself…
* More Rauner info from the Walsh interview…
* “I’m going to prosecute corruption wherever possible,” Rauner pledged. “I’m going to try and create an office of a special prosecutor purely to go after self-dealing and conflicts of interest in state government. They will be very busy in that role.”
* Former state Sen. James Meeks, a prominent African-American minister, is “helping” Rauner and “advising” him, the candidate claimed.
* Rauner said he would veto a gay marriage bill unless voters approve it during a referendum. He refused to say where he stood on the issue, saying he thought the people should decide.
* Rauner said he will address the crime problem in three ways: “Creating a boom economy in Illinois,” improving schools with charters and vouchers, and transforming the budgets at the state local levels. “We’ve got to take on the government union bosses that are bankrupting our governments and making them spend too much so we can afford to hire more police officers.”
At least he stays on message. Later, though, he said he wanted a “special deal” for police officers to spare them from pension cuts.
* The candidate pledged to reverse Rod Blagojevich’s executive order establishing “card check” union elections.
* He said he opposes legalizing marijuana, calling it a “slippery slope” to drug addiction.
* On abortion: “I do support a woman’s ability to decide early in pregnancy, but I would also support ways to make abortion safe and rare. I support parental notification, late term restricts, I would certainly advocate for adoption as a far, far better alternative.”
* On his Republican primary opponents: “I am fundamentally a different person. They are all career politicians who’ve been in Springfield for decades, every one of them. They all take government union money. They all are in the pension system. I don’t know how many of your listeners have seen what the legislators get in their pensions. It’s outrageous. It’s overly generous. It’s unfair. Nobody should be in that system, it should be a 401(k) system. None of them have been leaders. I’ve been a leader in everything I’ve ever done. I drive results. I’m financially independent, I can stand up to the corrupt interests in Springfield and I’m the only one who can get it done.”
41 Comments
|
The best? Really?
Thursday, Oct 17, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Frankly, you could’ve knocked me over with a feather when I read the Crain’s story about how AT&T had been rated the best mobile phone carrier in Chicago…
For the first time, AT&T finished first in calls, web surfing and text messaging on wireless phones, according to Root Metrics, which routinely tests networks in cities nationwide. AT&T dethroned Verizon Wireless, which previously had the best overall score.
AT&T’s edge is network speed more than quality. AT&T and Verizon were virtually tied in reliability.
Root Metrics, based in Bellevue, Wash., said AT&T’s download speed is 19.1 megabits per second, compared with 13.5 megabits for runner-up Verizon. […]
AT&T tied for the lowest rate of dropped calls, at 0.2 percent. […]
For AT&T, the study helps validate the billions the Dallas-based company spent in Illinois in recent years. It spent $2.6 billion on wired and wireless networks in Illinois between 2010 and 2012, followed by another $625 million in the first half of 2013. Although AT&T didn’t break out wireless spending, it has been adding infill networks aggressively in high-demand areas, such as Navy Pier, to take loads off the overall network.
* From the actual study…
With T-Mobile’s recent LTE launch, all four major carriers now offer LTE service
in Chicago.
AT&T’s average download speed increased from 17.8 Mbps to 19.1 Mbps since May testing, and its average
upload speed rose from 8.4 Mbps to 9.5 Mbps.
AT&T won the Combined and Data RootScore Awards outright for
the first time in Chicago. AT&T also won the Text RootScore Award.
Sprint’s average download speed decreased from 8.0 Mbps to 5.3 Mbps since May, and its
average upload speed fell from 5.1 Mbps to 4.0 Mbps.
T-Mobile’s average download speed increased from 8.6 Mbps to 9.6 Mbps, and its average upload speed jumped from 1.8 Mbps to 3.9 Mbps.
Verizon’s average download speed decreased from 14.8 Mbps to 13.5 Mbps, and its average upload speed fell from 9.3 Mbps to 6.6 Mbps.
Your thoughts?
18 Comments
|
SEC probing UNO
Thursday, Oct 17, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Uh-Oh.
Sun-Times…
Federal authorities are investigating possible securities violations involving the state’s largest charter-school operator, the scandal-scarred United Neighborhood Organization.
The federal Securities and Exchange Commission requested documents last month from the clout-heavy Chicago group, according to a letter obtained Wednesday by the Chicago Sun-Times. […]
A top UNO executive, Miguel d’Escoto, resigned in February, days after the Sun-Times reported the group gave $8.5 million of business to companies owned by two of d’Escoto’s brothers with money from $98 million in state school-construction grant funding.
The SEC is looking at how UNO raised more than $37.5 million on Wall Street in 2011 through state-approved bonds, the letter shows. […]
Quinn’s move to restore funding allowed UNO to finish construction of the state-funded UNO Soccer Academy High School on the Southwest Side.
Ald. Edward M. Burke (14th), a major Quinn campaign fund-raiser, had urged the governor to restore the funding, believed to be the largest government subsidy nationwide for a charter operator.
So far, the state has given UNO $83 million of the promised $98 million.
UNO also gets tens of millions of dollars a year from the Chicago Public Schools, which it relies on to run its schools and repay money it has borrowed.
* Tribune…
The SEC sent a June 26 letter to the state’s economic development agency asking for documents, meeting summaries and other communications related to the grants. The Tribune obtained that letter through an open records request.
Rangel, a co-chairman of Emanuel’s 2011 campaign, took some responsibility in May for the financial troubles at UNO as he stepped down as board chairman. He said he had failed to exercise the proper oversight during a time UNO experienced rapid growth. Rangel, however, remains the organization’s CEO, a $275,000-a-year job.
18 Comments
|
Rauner pledges to “go after” Madigan’s allies
Thursday, Oct 17, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Bruce Rauner had this to say on Joe Walsh’s radio show about how he would deal with Speaker Madigan if elected governor…
I can do things no career politician would think about doing. I can run the government like a business, challenge the government unions and their power, transform their deal through contract negotiations, and stand up to Madigan, because I know where his special interest groups are, and I can go after them. [Emphasis added.]
Discuss.
53 Comments
|
Couple of the Week: Tressa and Lauren
Thursday, Oct 17, 2013 - Posted by Advertising Department
[The following is a paid advertisement.]
Tressa Feher and Lauren Peters have been together for six years. They have been through a lot in that time, including Tressa’s 2011 surgery and treatment for breast cancer. Last year, they bought a house together, and they are expecting their first child in November.
“It has been an incredibly exciting year for us,” Lauren says.
Tress and Lauren are like any other couple, and they want the same things other couples want. Most of all, they want the freedom to make a lifelong commitment to each other. They want the security of knowing they can always protect each other.
But Illinois denies them the freedom to marry. “We’ve talked about going to Iowa or Minnesota since DOMA was overturned, but Illinois is our home,” Tressa says.
This isn’t just about the legal protections marriage affords. It’s about dignity. It’s about equality before the law. It’s about fairness.
It is time for the Illinois House of Representatives to get on the right side of history and pass SB10. It’s time to stop excluding same-sex couples from marriage. Illinois families can’t wait.
Watch Tressa and Lauren’s video…
For more information, visit IllinoisUnites.org.
Comments Off
|
|
Comments Off
|
|
Comments Off
|
This just in…
Wednesday, Oct 16, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* 4:06 pm - The Illinois Supreme Court has ruled that it will accept a direct appeal of the circuit court ruling on the lawsuit against Gov. Pat Quinn’s legislative salary veto. The ruling can be seen by clicking here.
* It’s gonna be a while before they get around to it, though…
Tybor is the Supreme Court spokesman.
15 Comments
|
Fact check
Wednesday, Oct 16, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The other day, Sheila Simon’s campaign sent out an e-mail asking people to check out her brand new website. So I did. And I found this…
The comptroller’s office plays an important role in the oversight of finances for local governments. Thousands of units of local government across Illinois are required to file annual reports with the comptroller. The current comptroller’s office has stated they are “just a repository” for this information, nothing more.
In addition, many of these units of local government are several years delinquent in filing their financial reports. Sheila will work to shine a light on delinquent local government and provide real analysis of the financial reports they submit to the comptroller. Sheila believes this type of oversight can help prevent the type of local corruption seen in places like Dixon, Washington Park, and Moro Township. [Emphasis added.]
* Many are still several years delinquent? Well that’s not good.
So, I checked with Comptroller Topinka’s spokesman and asked how many local governments were at least two years behind. I figured since Simon claimed “several years” I’d make sure it was more than one. Here is the response…
There are 5,200 local governments that file Annual Financial Reports with the Comptroller’s Office.
When Comptroller Topinka took office in 2011, there were 101 local governments that were more than two years delinquent with their filings. Today there are 28. Comptroller’s staff is in regular contact with those governments to bring them into compliance.
It is also worth noting that the Comptroller successfully pushed for legislation last year to fine local governments for late reports. The fining started on May 1 and we believe that it will encourage even greater compliance moving forward.
That works out to about a half percentage point delinquency rate. Not exactly a scandal, or even “many.”
26 Comments
|
This Is Illinois (Part 3,648)
Wednesday, Oct 16, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* AP…
A key figure in last summer’s Metra transit scandal is now working for the state of Illinois in a recrafted job after a referral from Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan.
Documents obtained by The Associated Press show that Patrick Ward was hired by Gov. Pat Quinn’s administration for a $70,000 post that was redefined after he was interviewed. His supervisory position currently has no one to supervise because of vacancies.
Officials say Ward received no special treatment and that his background qualified him for the job. But they exempted the post from normal hiring rules so he didn’t have to compete against other candidates. [Emphasis added]
Sigh.
* But, really, should this be any sort of surprise? I mean, the Speaker is more than just “adept” at patronage. He’s a master.
Remember this nifty little move from 2011?…
The Regional Transportation Authority has come up with an interesting solution of sorts to its continuing Springfield woes. It’s hired the son-in-law of Illinois House Speaker Mike Madigan for a $130,000-a-year job. […]
The RTA’s spokeswoman says there is “no relationship” between the hiring and the fact that RTA Chairman John Gates has had a rocky relationship with Mr. Madigan, with continual talk that the speaker might even run a bill to abolish the agency.
Yeah, no relationship whatsoever.
31 Comments
|
* Mayor Emanuel had real trouble today passing a resolution that everybody thought called for support of state legislation requiring mandatory minimum sentences on many first time gun possession violators. Opposition came mostly from African-American aldermen. DriXander was there…
* And then somebody read the actual resolution…
Oops.
* Read the resolution by clicking here. It says nothing at all about endorsing the mandatory minimum aspect of the legislation that Emanuel has been touting for days…
WHEREAS, Illinois should strengthen its sentencing laws so that people who commit crimes with firearms face tougher sentencing requirements; now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED, That we, the Mayor and Members of the City Council of the City of Chicago, do hereby urge the Illinois General Assembly to take action, in the interest of public safety, by passing legislation that strengthens our sentencing laws for those crimes committed with a firearm, requiring that 85 percent of each sentence be served regardless of the “bodily harm” inflicted
Maybe Emanuel is finally listening. Whatever the case, how do you pass a mandatory minimum bill in Springfield when the Chicago freaking city council won’t even back it?
9 Comments
|
Question of the day
Wednesday, Oct 16, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Sen. Michael Frerichs threw some political jabs at Rep. Tom Cross the other day. The two men are running for state treasurer. From the Champaign News-Gazette…
Cross, [Frerichs] said, is a “Springfield insider” who had “contributed to many of the most hazardous fiscal decisions leading to our current financial crisis.” Cross wants to “cut to the core the very programs that working families” depend on and is specifically aiming at public education and seniors.
Frerichs said he has been trying during his tenure in the Senate, and so far failing, “to clean up the mess Leader Cross helped to create over the past 20 years.”
The CN-G didn’t like the hometown guy’s rhetoric…
To have power in Springfield, you have to be a Democrat. Cross is a Republican, and he’s spent most of his time in Springfield trying to wipe away the sand kicked into his eyes by Democrats.
Here’s a little history lesson Frerichs hopes people don’t remember. Illinois is a solid Democratic state. Democrats control the governor’s office, both houses of the Legislature with veto-proof majorities, and the Supreme Court.
Republicans last controlled both houses of the Legislature in 1994. They last controlled one legislative chamber, the Senate, in 2003. They last had a Republican governor — George Ryan — in 2003. They’re out of power and out of luck, hoping somehow to win back public confidence and begin playing a significant role in the formulation of public policy.
But they’re not there yet. In fact, they’re not even close. That’s why Frerichs’ characterization of Cross is preposterous.
* The Question: Do agree with Frerichs or the News-Gazette? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please.
polls
43 Comments
|
* We discussed Bruce Rauner’s pension idea yesterday….
He favors capping pensions that have already been earned and moving government employees to a defined benefit, 401(k)-type of retirement plan.
As I told you before, this idea is laid out in a bill sponsored by Rep. Tom Morrison…
Amends the Illinois Pension Code. With respect to the 5 State-funded retirement systems: Provides a new funding formula for State contributions, with a 100% funding goal and amortization calculated on a level dollar amount.
Provides that no additional service credit may be accrued and no automatic increase in a retirement annuity shall be received. Provides that the pensionable salary of an active participant may not exceed that individual’s pensionable salary as of the effective date.
Provides that State-funded retirement systems shall establish self-directed retirement plans for all active participants and all employees hired on or after the effective date. Provides that all active participants shall have the option of participating in a self-directed retirement plan. Provides that these changes are controlling over any other law. Effective immediately.
* Rep. Morrison explained in an e-mail that this would not require Social Security payments…
No, SS payments would not be required because the total percentage contribution by teachers and their school districts (8% from teachers and 7% from school districts) exceeds the threshold that the SSA requires.
* i asked Aviva Bowen of the IFT for a response to the proposal…
Representative Morrison’s proposal would put teachers and other workers into risky waters without a raft. If the market crashes and our retirement security ship springs a major leak, private sector employees can stay afloat because they have Social Security benefits. Teachers don’t get Social Security and would drown, though Wall Street insiders like Bruce Rauner could make a killing by charging higher fees than the systems currently pay, all at taxpayers’ expense.
We also can’t forget that in our current fiscal situation, there are two ways for districts to pay this added cost: raising property taxes or slashing already slim school budgets.
That last point was quite interesting.
* Back to Rep. Morrison…
[The bill] would cost school districts 7% of their personnel costs.
* So, is this another version of the much-hated Democratic-sponsored “cost shift”? Morrison says it could be absorbed by a majority of districts…
(P)er their respective contracts, a majority of school districts already pick up some or all of the employee contribution to TRS, so a 7% contribution to a 401K type plan is very doable.
I agree it’s doable for those districts, but it would cost other districts more. A lot more.
* So, I asked Rauner’s campaign to comment on the very real probability that his pension reform plan would lead to local property tax hikes and/or local school budget cuts. I haven’t yet heard back, but I’ll let you know if they ever respond.
*** UPDATE *** I asked Teachers Retirement System spokesman Dave Urbanek if the Morrison bill would activate Social Security payments. His reply…
Rich:
The ultimate decision would be up to the Social Security Administration. The bill, as I read it, does not require teachers to be in Social Security, but state statutes would not be the last word in the discussion. It’s a federal decision.
It is our understanding that a major determining factor in that kind of decision is not the contributions made by the employee and the employer to a separate government-run retirement plan, but the ultimate benefit that the employee would receive in retirement from that government-sponsored plan. For working people who are not in Social Security, the SSA sets a “safe harbor” threshold that corresponds to the benefit that its members receive. We are told by our actuaries that if the benefit from a government-run plan for someone who is not in Social Security falls below the Social Security safe harbor threshold, then the SSA steps in and places those members into Social Security so they do meet the safe harbor.
That is the situation that we’re facing with Tier II members. This is something that has been publicized for more than a year. The TRS actuaries tell us that because the Tier II benefit grows at a slower pace than the Tier I benefit and the Social Security benefit, that in about a decade the Tier II benefit will fall below the safe harbor threshold and that the SSA will compel TRS members into Social Security. What we’re not sure of is how that happens, and whether the SSA would compel all TRS members into Social Security, or just the affected Tier II members. The actuaries never mentioned that the decision had anything to do with contributions paid by members. Tier II members right now pay the same 9.4 percent of payroll to TRS that Tier I members pay, but on an apples-apples comparison with payroll, the Tier II benefit is 6 percent of payroll, so the Tier II members are paying for their entire benefit. The Tier I benefit is 17.29 percent of payroll, so Tier I members are paying a little more than half of their benefit. The extra 3.4 percent contribution being paid by Tier II members right now automatically goes to subsidize Tier I benefits.
So, as a general rule of thumb, if the pension code is changed in any way to reduce benefits and because of those changes retiree benefits will someday fall below the safe harbor threshold, then when that happens the SSA will act to bring everyone into the safe harbor.
I hope this helps.
Dave
44 Comments
|
Quinn attends huge anti-Rahm rally
Wednesday, Oct 16, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* According to the Tribune, thousands of union members and other activists gathered yesterday to “take back Chicago” from Mayor Rahm Emanuel and his “corporate, greedy, elitist friends”…
Speakers at the rally had their own ideas, like having the Chicago Public Schools board elected, rather than appointed by the mayor. The crowd cheered video footage of last year’s Chicago Teachers Union strike. Also singled out for criticism was the mayor’s closing of six mental health clinics as part of a broader privatization effort.
* Among those in attendance was none other than Gov. Pat Quinn…
The populist themes are familiar to the re-election-seeking Quinn, who repeated his vow to raise the state’s minimum wage and recounted his days as an organizer, when he founded the Citizens Utility Board, a consumer watchdog group.
“You don’t get changes from the big shots on top of the power heap,” Quinn said. “It bubbles up from grass-roots community leaders, everyday people banding together for a cause they believe in.”
* If you watch the raw video, this was a blatantly anti-Rahm rally…
Lots of loud and angry yelling. Quinn’s remarks begin at around the 1:42:30 mark. He didn’t really say all that much, but his presence at that rally likely won’t go unnoticed by the 5th Floor.
* And speaking of anger, SEIU Local One’s Jerry Morrison sent a text message to reporters last night…
I thought folks might be interested in a Chicago jobs update.
First things first, it has been five days since Dominick’s announced they were closing their 72 Chicago area stores and Mayor Rahm Emanuel has not yet uttered the word Dominick’s. I will keep everyone abreast of that number much like Nightline did during the Iran Hostage crisis.
It may ease your mind to know that Mayor Emanuel did find time to go on a Divy bike ride of Logan Square though.
Also, our preliminary research shows that over the last 18 months the City of Chicago has lost well over 11,000 good paying union jobs.
That is a combination of the CPS layoffs, other various public sector layoffs, WARN Act announced layoffs, and just 4,000 of the recently announced Dominick’s layoffs.
I should note this is an extremely conservative estimate and does not include the mass layoffs at Hostess earlier this year. We will
have a more detailed report of job loss under Mayor Emanuel soon. In the mean time could someone just ask Rahm why $16 million for a Whole Foods in Englewood and nothing to save the more than 6,000 jobs at Dominick’s?
39 Comments
|
You gotta be kidding me
Wednesday, Oct 16, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* October 1st Sun-Times story…
Dillard said on Tuesday that he expected to have about half a million dollars on hand by the end of the filing period.
* October 15th Sun-Times story…
State Sen. Kirk Dillard (R-Hinsdale) did better than Brady in his overall take, reporting $313,372 in overall contributions between his two political funds. He spent a combined $251,415 and had the least amount of any of the major candidates for governor left in the bank: $205,722.
So, Dillard had less than half the cash on hand that he bragged about two weeks ago.
Sheesh.
* And speaking of pathetic campaign finance reports, GOP congressional candidate Erika Harold actually did worse in the third quarter than she did in the second quarter…
She reported $72,619 in receipts in July, August and September. She had reported $78,285 in contributions between May 31 and June 30.
Her excuse in the second quarter was that she was just getting started and needed time to put together a fundraising operation. Well, she’s had plenty of time to do that and she hasn’t come through.
* But she did outraise Bill Brady…
Brady raised only a combined $66,178 and spent a combined $73,851 during the period.
Oy.
* Gov. Pat Quinn, on the other hand, is raising and stockpiling big bucks…
Quinn reported having $2.93 million in the bank. He raised $813,077 and spent $199,640 during the quarter, according to his filing with the State Board of Elections.
61 Comments
|
Get to the table and get a deal
Wednesday, Oct 16, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* I asked the NRA’s Todd Vandermyde last week about Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s proposal to slap mandatory minimum sentences on some repeat and first time offenses. Here’s his e-mailed response…
Still looks problematic as they want 3 years on any first offense. We just had a guy spend 14 months in Cook County for having an out of state carry permit.
We have a 17 year old sitting in Cook for bringing a gun to school because he was scared and they want to wreck his life for it.
What about out of staters who don’t get that their permit is no good here? What about the out of staters who the State Police won’t let apply?
[Cook County State’s Attorney Anita Alvarez] had to drop the charges of over 100 people. What makes anyone think she won’t over charge carry permit violations with [Aggravated Unlawful Use of a Weapon] because she hates guns?
Most of it, are things we have said, but at some point, I think their possession by a streetgang member is going to run afoul of freedom of association issues when no criminal record exists.
Vandermyde opposed the mandatory minimum bill during the spring session, but told a Chicago City Council committee not long ago: “Yes, we can support a mandatory minimum… if they’re not prohibited from not owning a gun generally we can support mandatory minimums especially for repeat offenders:
Listen…
* Vandermyde also had this to say to the Sun-Times…
He presented the hypothetical situation of a man with a concealed-carry permit leaving a gun in his vehicle because he and his wife are going into a place where guns are banned.
“Your wife leaves without you, takes the car and gets pulled over,” he said. “Now she is jammed up with a mandatory minimum.”
* The problem now, as I see it, is that the NRA is chafing at Chicago’s insistence on running a bill their way, so Vandermyde is pushing back…
Todd Vandermyde, a lobbyist for the NRA, said the group disagrees with the three-year minimums for first-time offenders. He blasted Emanuel for not doing enough to combat city violence.
“The mayor is looking for a public relations solution to a crime problem that he can’t get his hands around,” he said.
* But the Illinois Association of Chiefs of Police, which backed concealed carry, wants the bill passed…
While we support and enforce the rights of law-abiding citizens to possess and maintain firearms, the reality is that these rights are undermined every day by illegal gun violence and arbitrary sentencing. Illegal possession of a loaded gun is a violent crime and the laws should reflect that reality.
This bill will help reduce violent crime in Chicago and the entire state because it is narrowly targeted to reach the most violent offenders. According to a 2011 University of Chicago Crime Lab analysis of all felons sentenced to probation, offenders convicted of aggravated unlawful use of a weapon were 4 times more likely to be re-arrested for homicide and nearly 9 times more likely to be re-arrested for a shooting than other felons. Certain laws must be put in place to keep our streets safe, deter violent criminals and protect the rights of honest citizens.
Gun offenders put our officers and our families at risk. Last month in a mass shooting , 13 individuals including a 3-year boy were shot in Cornell Square Park. One of the accused shooters, Byron Champ was convicted of felony possession of a weapon in 2012 and could still be serving his prison sentence. You may also recall that Hadiya Pendleton was allegedly shot by Michael Ward, a prior gun offender who should have been in prison for his violent crime but was instead out on the streets.
* Hadiya Pendleton’s mother has stepped forward, which only increases the emotionalism behind the legislation…
Nine months after her murdered, 15-year-old daughter became the nationwide face of Chicago’s epidemic of gun violence, Cleopatra Pendleton can’t help but wonder, “What if?”
What if the Illinois Legislature had already approved a mandatory minimum, three-year sentence for gun crimes before Jan. 29, the day Hadiya Pendleton was gunned down while hanging out with friends at a park a few blocks from King College Prep?
“Learning that my daughter’s alleged murderer had been in jail for another gun crime was devastating. It was like rubbing salt in an open wound. It was like losing her all over again,” Pendleton said Tuesday.
“Every day, I wake up with a reminder that I’m in a world without her — without her life without her laughter, without her love. I wonder if a larger mandatory minimum had been in place if the person [who] allegedly shot and killed my daughter would have been in jail and Hadiya would still be alive.”
* Everyone can empathize with the Pendleton family of course, but the business of lawmaking requires compromise, and the simple fact is that the NRA has a lot of allies in the General Assembly and it has to be dealt with. Besides, not everyone on the liberal end of the equation is fully on board, either…
Sen. Kwame Raoul, a South Side Democrat who negotiated the concealed carry measure on behalf of gun control advocates, said he was torn by the mayor’s “desire and sense of urgency to do something about” gun violence and fears that an “unintended defendant would more likely be a person of color.” […]
Democratic Gov. Pat Quinn has said he would review Emanuel’s proposal. A spokeswoman said Tuesday the governor believes the most effective concept of reducing violence is to come up with “a comprehensive approach.”
Perhaps the most telling prospect signaling the fate of Emanuel’s legislation came from a spokeswoman for Senate President John Cullerton, the Chicago Democrat who is one of the mayor’s closest allies in the legislature.
Cullerton “shares the mayor’s goal of reducing gun violence in the city,” spokeswoman Rikeesha Phelon wrote in an email. “However, we are still reviewing the proposal, implementation concerns and cost estimates with the caucus and other stakeholders.”
So, rather than the usual Chicago bluster, which almost always results in nothing being done, how about they try to work out a deal before the personality conflicts make that impossible?
55 Comments
|
|
Comments Off
|
|
Comments Off
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
   
|
Hosted by MCS
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax
Advertise Here
Mobile Version
Contact Rich Miller
|
