It has begun
Tuesday, Jul 16, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* There’s no doubt in my mind that Gov. Pat Quinn is planning a blistering, populist campaign against Bill Daley. If nothing else, it’ll be a good tuneup for Bruce Rauner, if he manages to win the GOP primary. From a press conference today…
“I think I’m a lot different than Bill Daley,” Mr. Quinn finally allowed. “He has a better tailor. But I know how to work with ordinary people.”
Mr. Quinn returned to that theme more than once, suggesting that Mr. Daley’s resume as a former presidential chief of staff, national political operative and banker lacks resonance with ordinary Democratic voters.
“I’m a people person,” Mr. Quinn said. “I get along with ordinary people. I’m not gong to go and hang out with millionaires.”
Quinn’s best hope for victory is a full-on “class warfare” attack. It’s begun.
* Raw audio…
59 Comments
|
A walk down Madigan memory lane
Tuesday, Jul 16, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Dave McKinney interviewed several Madigan family members back in 1998 after Lisa Madigan defeated Sen. Bruce Farley, a former Speaker Madigan lieutenant. The Sun-Times has reposted Dave’s story. Here’s an excerpt about the run-up to the Farley challenge, but go read the whole thing…
But gathered with her family a few months later at Trattoria Roma, an Italian eatery a block from Mike Madigan’s alma mater, St. Ignatius High School, she sprung her political plan.
“I didn’t think anything of it,” the speaker said. “I discouraged it for several months. Then, after maybe three months, I finally relented and agreed. ‘OK, we’ll try and do this.’ But I laid out for her what kind of nightmare I was going to go through.”
She made a strong case to her father.
“It was mainly a very fatherly reaction. His concern, which he is absolutely correct about, is I will . . . end up bearing the brunt of his enemies. People who can’t attack him will attack me. I said, ‘OK. I recognize that. I think I have the strength to deal with that.’ ”
* A father/daughter pic from the old days…
55 Comments
|
* Home rule units have ten days from the date of the state concealed carry law’s enactment to ban assault weapons.
I’m kinda surprised that Lake Forest didn’t go through with it…
The Lake Forest City Council elected to let the state determine its fate in regard to assault weapons, despite hundreds of community members attending a recent meeting to urge the council to take a stance on the issue.
After the state legislature recently passed a measure allowing concealed carry of handguns, home-rule municipalities were given 10 days from the time Gov. Pat Quinn signed the law to pass local ordinances on assault weapons. Should they fail to do so, such weapons would be allowed in the communities.
After hours of heated comment on the topic on July 1, the Lake Forest City Council tabled a draft ordinance that would have placed restrictions on assault weapons. Some of those in attendance said they believed the ordinance would be brought up again at the council’s Monday meeting, but the topic was left off the agenda.
Mayor Donald Schoenheider told a packed audience during public comments on Monday that he did not include the item because there was a consensus among members that it would not be passed. He said the draft ordinance was not very strong, and could leave the city open to lawsuits.
He said after consulting with the city attorney and individual members of the council, it was decided the state could better handle imposing weapon bans and restrictions.
* Meanwhile, NRA lobbyist Todd Vandermyde sent over a list early this morning of yesterday’s suburban votes to ban assault weapons…
Batavia – FAILED
Buffalo Grove – passed a bifurcated ordinance Cook yes Lake no
Clarendon Hills – FAILED
Darien – FAILED
Evanston – PASSED modified to exempt C&R licensees
Evergreen Park – FAILED no motion
Flossmoor – FAILED
Gurnee – NO ACTION, DEAD
Lake Forest – TABLED
Lake Zurich – NO BAN. Shell ordinance Failed.
Morton Grove – pending
Round Lake – No Ban
Round Lake Beach – FAILED
Steger – FAILED
University Park— Ban FAILED, storage ordinance passed
Waukegan – FAILED
36 Comments
|
Unclear on the concept
Tuesday, Jul 16, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Some of you have pointed out in comments that if you Googled Kirk Dillard’s name you were directed to a campaign website that was apparently still under construction.
The Sun-Times has more…
On that page you see a pitifully amateur-looking error page that says “under construction” and links back to Dillard’s Facebook page.
But on today’s news release accompanying Dillard’s launch the web address of kirkdillard.com is listed. It indeed is a professional-looking Web site and his campaign said it was launched last night to coincide with today’s announcement.
When the Sun-Times called Wes Bleed, one of Dillard’s press people, to ask about it, he confirmed Kirkdillard.com is the official site for the gubernatorial race.
So what’s the deal with the other web address? Was that a prank by a rival?
“Let’s put it this way,” says Bleed, “I’m not familiar with it.”
You’re not familiar with it, Wes?
Really?
Um, all it took was a quick check of the Network Solutions page to find that electdillard.com is owned by none other than Kirk Dillard.
And now the page shows this…
C’mon, people! You never heard of auto-forward???
Get in the game!
* Meanwhile, there are real perils with using stock images in campaign ads…
Kirk Dillard’s new professionally-produced campaign video that attempts to conjure images of a revitalized Illinois features a sign at a cafe called Lift Coffee Shop with an employee next to a sign that reads: “open.”
The business is open.
But in a different state.
A worker at Lift Coffee Shop said the cafe is in Richmond, Virginia and it is independently-owned.
The campaign admitted it goofed.
The video has since been deleted. Here’s the new video. Rate it…
42 Comments
|
Money report
Tuesday, Jul 16, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From the Twitters…
Yeah, she just got into the race early last month, but that’s still horrible. The Democratic candidate, Ann Callis, raised $225K and had about $200K cash on hand. Callis announced in early May.
Announcing ain’t enough. You gotta put in the work.
* Meanwhile, freshman Democratic Congressman Brad Schneider raised $384K and had $531K cash on hand. Republican Bruce Dold outraised him with $546K and $616K cash on hand.
* Sen. Dick Durbin raised $1.27 million and had over $4.25 million on hand.
* And this is old news, but…
[Gov. Pat Quinn] raised about $1 million from April 1 to June 30 and now has $2.3 million in available funds.
Former White House Chief of Staff Bill Daley is the Chicago Democrat challenging Quinn in the March primary. He’s raised more than $796,000.
On the Republican side, venture capitalist Bruce Rauner of Winnetka brought in $916,000. But campaign expenses reduced his cash on hand to $642,000. State treasurer Dan Rutherford of Chenoa raised $433,000.
Republican State Sens. Bill Brady of Bloomington and Kirk Dillard of Hinsdale brought in $61,000 and $293,000, respectively.
29 Comments
|
Question of the day
Tuesday, Jul 16, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From Attorney General Lisa Madigan’s big announcement yesterday…
Ultimately, however, there has always been another consideration that impacts my decision. I feel strongly that the state would not be well served by having a Governor and Speaker of the House from the same family and have never planned to run for Governor if that would be the case. With Speaker Madigan planning to continue in office, I will not run for Governor.
* Tribune editorial…
The race for governor could go in any direction. As is, Democrats would choose between Gov. Pat Quinn and challenger William Daley. Republicans have a growing list of options.
For now, a new parlor game: Wouldn’t Illinois be better off if Madigan pere had deferred to Madigan fille?
* The Question: Should Speaker Madigan have agreed to step down to allow Lisa Madigan to run for governor? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please.
panel management
72 Comments
|
Quinn heads south, touts beautiful bathrooms
Tuesday, Jul 16, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The governor made a rare southern Illinois appearance yesterday…
On Monday, Governor Quinn made his first visit to Southern Illinois in almost a year.
The Governor was in Marion breaking ground for new construction along I-57 and touting the jobs it will bring to Southern Illinois. He also used the visit to discuss state issues such as pension reform.
* His excuse…
Quinn said circumstances have pre-empted visits to Southern Illinois in recent months, including in May when he was a no-show to announce an expansion of Aisin Electronics Illinois in Marion. That time, the state’s still ongoing pension crisis was reason enough to stay in Springfield.
* Usually, the governor’s advance staff would avoid photo ops like this…
Oops.
41 Comments
|
Blagojevich files his appeal
Tuesday, Jul 16, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Tribune…
Lawyers for disgraced former Gov. Rod Blagojevich filed a long-awaited appeal of his conviction and 14-year sentence late Monday, arguing that U.S. District Judge James Zagel’s “one-sided evidentiary rulings” favored prosecutors and that the stiff sentence he imposed was based on vague and speculative evidence.
The 91-page appeal, filed about an hour before a midnight deadline set by the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, maintained that Zagel kept Blagojevich’s attorneys from rebutting cooperating government witnesses and pointing out potential biases in their testimony.
Jurors were also wrongly instructed about bribery and fraud laws and how they pertained to “political deal-making,” the appeal argued.
The lower court “misled the jury by failing to explain the legal distinction between campaign contributions and bribes,” the lawyers wrote.
* Sun-Times...
The appeal essentially rehashes arguments Blagojevich’s attorneys unsuccessfully made to Judge James Zagel and jurors in the run-up to and during his two trials, repeating Blagojevich’s claims that he was attempting to make a legitimate “political deal” when he offered to appoint President Obama’s choice for the Senate in return for a post inside Obama’s administration.
Had Blagojevich “not sought a political benefit in return, he would have done a disservice to all of his supporters,” Blagojevich’s attorneys wrote in their appeal, describing the attempted sale of the Senate seat as the “non-existent crime of attempted political horse-trading.”
Likewise Blagojevich’s appeal asserts that he never acted on an illegal offer to accept campaign donations in return for appointing disgraced former U.S. Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. to the Senate.
It argues Blagojevich’s convictions for shaking down a horse racing executive and a children’s hospital should also be tossed because “the government failed to prove an explicit quid pro quo agreement, as required under the law,” adding that the government misinterpreted a “false statement” he was convicted of making to the FBI.
* AP…
The appeal also points to what it says was a lack of evenhandedness by U.S. District Judge James Zagel throughout Blagojeivch’s two trials.
It alleges Zagel gave Blagojevich little choice but to testify at his retrial after repeatedly ruling arguments the defense viewed as crucial could only be broached by Blagojevich himself from the witness stand. Once on the stand, Zagel prohibited many of those statements, including Blagojevich’s attempt to tell jurors he believed at the time that his actions were legal, it contends.
“Had Blagojevich been permitted to present his good-faith defense, it would have been a powerful defense, likely to produce an acquittal,” his lawyers argue.
The appeal also blames Zagel for allowing a juror who allegedly expressed bias against Blagojevich to remain on the jury despite defense attorneys’ objections. The appeal only referred to the panelist as Juror No. 174, saying he said about Blagojevich during jury selection, “I just figured him, possibly, to be guilty.”
The appeal also raises longstanding claims that Zagel barred FBI wiretap evidence that might have aided the defense, that he sided overwhelmingly with prosecutors and that he miscalculated the appropriate prison term for Blagojevich.
The appeal itself is here.
Discuss.
22 Comments
|
Report: Simon to run against Topinka
Tuesday, Jul 16, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Sun-Times…
Lt. Gov. Sheila Simon is likely to announce a run for Comptroller next week, a source will knowledge of the decision told the Sun-Times.
Simon is shifting gears after Illinois Atty. Gen. Lisa Madigan’s announcement that she would not vacate her position after all. Simon had been eyeing the AG’s spot when Lisa Madigan said she’d be interested in a possible run for governor.
I polled this race a while ago. Despite this being a Democratic state, she trailed Comptroller Topinka by seven points.
55 Comments
|
Caption contest!
Tuesday, Jul 16, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* This photo was taken a few hours before Lisa Madigan announced that she would not run for governor…
47 Comments
|
Try again
Tuesday, Jul 16, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* It almost seems as if the Chicago media is attempting to will a Downstate Democrat into the governor’s race. As I’ve pointed out twice before, stories keep appearing about a mythical candidate who could sweep in and take all those Downstate counties away from Pat Quinn and Bill Daley without actually naming somebody who is willing and able to run.
Another one popped up last night...
One new name as a possible Democratic contender is state Sen. David Koehler (D-Peoria), who has a strong labor backing.
I called Sen. Koehler yesterday and he laughed and laughed. No way is he running for governor.
Just to be on the safe side, I also called Sen. Mike Frerichs last night. Frerichs was mentioned in an AP story as a possible candidate. He ain’t running for governor, either.
* And now we have a new twist…
State Sen. Kwame Raoul, D-Chicago, also had been considering a bid for attorney general. Raoul, who has been a Senate Democratic negotiator on major issues including pension changes and concealed carry legislation, appeared to rule out lower offices but left open the possibility of a run for governor.
“I had a pretty good fundraising quarter, and I think the work that I’ve done allows me the opportunity to reflect on my options,” Raoul told the Tribune.
Sen. Raoul seemed surprised to find out this morning that his name had been floated. He said he’d think about it for a day, so he didn’t exactly give me a strong indication that he’d be running for governor this time around.
27 Comments
|
The conspiracy theory that wasn’t
Tuesday, Jul 16, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* We’ll have more on the Lisa Madigan thing soon, but I wanted to post this timeline first.
* June 14th Chicago Tribune…
[Speaker Madigan has] shouldered much of the blame for the inaction on pension reform, with Democrats and Republicans alike wondering if he’s purposely stalling in an effort to make Quinn look bad as his daughter, Attorney General Lisa Madigan, ponders a potential Democratic primary challenge.
* June 18th Chicago Tribune…
Speaker Madigan has been accused by some of holding up a solution on pension reform to make Quinn look weak as Attorney General Madigan weighs a possible run for governor.
* June 19th Chicago Tribune…
House Republican leader Tom Cross of Oswego said last week he thinks the stalemate is a scheme by Madigan and Cullerton to help Attorney General Lisa Madigan, the speaker’s daughter, as she considers whether to run for governor against Quinn — a conspiracy theory Democrats deny.
* July 16th Tribune…
…the speaker refused to attend a meeting of Democratic legislative leaders called by Quinn after the General Assembly’s failure to fix the state’s massively unfunded public employee pension system. Critics said the move bordered on arrogance, even as questions continued about Quinn’s leadership abilities.
Those issues made certain that any candidacy for governor by Lisa Madigan would have been an all-out campaign against Michael Madigan — something the longest-serving House speaker in Illinois has never faced on such a high-profile stage.
We could get into all the John Kass conspiracy theories as well, but why bother?
The point here is that the Tribune and others kept claiming that the Speaker was purposely doing something to help his daughter, when it appeared obvious at the time that the actions were actually hurting his daughter.
Conspiracy theories are generally to be avoided.
33 Comments
|
$2 million gay marriage push announced
Tuesday, Jul 16, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From a press release…
Today, Illinois Unites for Marriage announced a renewed strategy designed to win the freedom to marry in Illinois, including hiring a Campaign Manager, Field Director, and Faith Organizer. The strategic plan also includes a new statewide field program, a coordinated House party engagement program, and a robust earned and paid media campaign.
The $2 million dollar campaign will include 15 field organizers placed throughout the state to engage with the ‘silent majority’ of voters who support marriage equality. The field organizers will be supported by mail and phone programs targeting legislators who don’t currently support the freedom to marry. The campaign will also reach out to the statewide LGBTQ community through a series of house parties designed to educate people about how they can be involved in passing marriage equality. Additionally, Illinois Unites is planning a robust media campaign, featuring Illinois residents who are currently being denied the federal benefits they could get outside of their home state.
“I’m excited to lead this already strong leadership team. Our expanded leadership structure brings together labor, political, community and religious organizing, creating a ground-game that directly engages voters to win the freedom to marry in Illinois.” said John Kohlhepp, the newly-tapped Campaign Manager for Illinois Unites.
Funds for the stepped-up campaign will come from a broad range of organizations and individuals, including:
• Human Rights Campaign
• Freedom to Marry
• Lambda Legal
• Equality Illinois
• The Civil Rights Agenda
• ACLU of Illinois
• Thousands of Individual organizations and donors
“With the recent Supreme Court ruling on DOMA, Illinois families need marriage more urgently than ever, and they shouldn’t have to travel outside of our borders to get it. Illinois Unites will bring same-sex couples and their children the protections and responsibilities of marriage as soon as possible,” Kohlhepp said.
John Kohlhepp, a labor lobbyist on leave from AFSCME Council 31, comes to Illinois Unites with over ten years of lobbying experience, having run statewide field efforts during the Responsible Budget Coalition’s campaign to increase the income tax. Additionally, he has directed field efforts in multiple Congressional and legislative districts in every election cycle since 2004. Field Director Keron Blair, an organizer on leave from the Midwest Academy, worked in New Orleans post-Katrina and, while at Interfaith Worker Justice, engaged religious leaders in healthcare, immigration and labor campaigns. Faith Organizer Reverend Benjamin Reynolds joins Illinois Unites with a vast amount of pastoral experience and recently served as the Director of the LGBTQ Religious Studies Center at Chicago Theological Seminary.
“The next few months are critical. Representatives in Springfield have said they want to hear from their constituents, a growing majority of whom believe in the freedom to marry. We are expanding our field plan to make sure their voices are heard,” said Jim Bennett, Chair of the Illinois Unites Coalition. “This team has a track record of getting things done, and they know how to pressure from the outside while working to get the 60 votes we need and get this bill called. Marriage is coming to Illinois.”
Is it enough?
Discuss.
29 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
* From a press release…
LISA MADIGAN ANNOUNCES REELECTION BID
Chicago – Lisa Madigan today announced her campaign for reelection as Illinois Attorney General. In seeking her fourth term, Madigan will build on an extraordinary record of accomplishment in protecting consumers, generating critical revenue for the state, safeguarding communities, and fighting for open and accountable government.
Since taking office in 2003, Madigan has established herself as a national leader in protecting consumers. Throughout the home foreclosure crisis that devastated the nation’s economy, Madigan has fought to hold lenders accountable for their financial misconduct and to provide assistance to struggling Illinois families and communities. Her efforts have resulted in over $2 billion in relief for homeowners in Illinois. Madigan also has consistently fought against unfair utility rates, obtaining over $1 billion in relief for electricity consumers.
In a time of fiscal crisis, Madigan’s office has generated over $9 billion for the state. Her work has included partnering with the Department of Revenue to lead a multi-year enforcement initiative that has collected over $82 million from gasoline station owners and operators who have evaded sales taxes.
Madigan has led statewide efforts to curb the manufacture, sale and use of methamphetamine, drafting new laws to address this deadly drug, training law enforcement and prosecutors, and prosecuting meth conspiracy cases. With the rise of synthetic drug use in recent years, Madigan put Illinois at the forefront of this fight by launching a successful initiative to get synthetic drugs out of retail stores and drafting a new law to crack down on sales of these drugs.
As part of her extensive work to protect women and children from sexual assault, Madigan drafted and negotiated a law requiring the testing of DNA evidence collected in sexual assault investigations, making Illinois the first state in the nation with this mandate. Madigan also has drafted laws to require lifetime supervision for the most dangerous sex offenders and to improve the state’s Sex Offender Registry. Additionally, Madigan leads the Illinois Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force and has undertaken a successful initiative to identify, track and apprehend the most prolific child pornography offenders.
As Attorney General, Madigan has created new tools to fight for government transparency and accountability. She created the first-ever Public Access Counselor in the office and worked with open government advocates to spearhead successful legislative efforts to strengthen the state’s sunshine laws. She also has taken criminal and civil actions against government misconduct and fraud, successfully prosecuting public officials and minority contracting fraud.
In her fourth term, Madigan will continue her successful record of advocacy on behalf of the people of Illinois.
Statement from Lisa Madigan on her decision to seek reelection as Attorney General:
“For the last several months, I have considered the best way to continue serving the people of Illinois. Deciding whether to seek reelection or to run for Governor has not been easy. I love my job as Attorney General and continue to be excited about the important work we are doing and what we can do for people and families in the years ahead. I considered running for Governor because of the need for effective management from that office and the frustration so many of us feel about the current lack of progress on critical issues facing Illinois.
Ultimately, however, there has always been another consideration that impacts my decision. I feel strongly that the state would not be well served by having a Governor and Speaker of the House from the same family and have never planned to run for Governor if that would be the case. With Speaker Madigan planning to continue in office, I will not run for Governor.
I have been honored to have so many people across Illinois voice their support for me as I considered this decision. I look forward to continuing to fight for everyone in Illinois as Attorney General.” [Emphasis added.]
Blaming it on the dad. Wow.
…Adding… From late last month…
Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan doesn’t believe her father, Speaker of the House Michael Madigan, would have to step down if she makes a run for governor.
Madigan, after serving on a panel Thursday hosted by the influential Emily’s List at Willis Tower, was unequivocal when posed the question now being constantly raised. “He wouldn’t have to. He wouldn’t have to step down,” she retorted to a reporter, emphasizing the move would not be a requirement.
Something obviously changed.
…Adding more… AG Madigan’s people are strongly objecting to the use of the term “blamed.” I’m being told that there is no blame here, she’s just stating the facts as they are. The father won’t step down, so she’s not running.
…Adding even more… The AG finally sent a quick e-mail to her campaign supporters at 7 o’clock tonight. It was basically just the press release.
…More… Bill Daley…
Daley: “Voters now have a clear choice between a proven leader who gets things done and a governor who can’t seem to get anything done.”
160 Comments
|
Question of the day
Monday, Jul 15, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* We talked about the Speaker Madigan and Metra stories last week.
* The Question: Should all Illinois politicians be legally barred from recommending any sort of employment conditions for anyone?
[For some reason, the poll wasn’t working. So, just answer in comments. Sorry.]
70 Comments
|
Dillard formally kicks off campaign
Monday, Jul 15, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Sen. Kirk Dillard kicks off his gubernatorial campaign today…
Once again, Dillard, who served as chief of staff to Gov. Jim Edgar, will have Edgar on his side. Dillard’s two-day announcement tour — which does not include a stop in Springfield — does include one Monday afternoon with Edgar at the Governor Oglesby Mansion in Decatur.
Why skip the capital city?
“Decatur is an ancestral home for my wife’s family and is a quintessential downstate large city,” he said, noting it is between Champaign-Urbana and Springfield.
More from Bernie…
Dillard earlier this year talked about how it would be good to have a first family back in the mansion. He has daughters ages 12 and 10, and I asked last week if he expects they would go to school in Springfield if he is elected
“We’ll cross that bridge when we get there,” he said. “If I get elected, we will figure out to what extent the children full-time reside in Springfield.”
* AP…
It’s the second bid for the post for Dillard, of DuPage County, who lost to Brady in the 2010 Republican primary by only 193 votes. But he pins that loss on moderate, suburban votes being split among several candidates from the same area — himself, former GOP Chair Andy McKenna and former Attorney General Jim Ryan.
Dillard said the state Republican Party risks repeating the same mistakes it made in 2010, with a crowded field and, so far, no consensus candidate.
“It is unbelievable that the Republican Party, and to some extent the business community, learned nothing from the 2010 gubernatorial primary, which resulted in a 67 percent income tax (increase) and Democrat domination” through the political redistricting process in 2010 that was controlled by the Democrats, he said.
I think the business community may be learning by coalescing behind Bruce Rauner. We’ll see.
* Announcement press release…
Illinois State Senator Kirk Dillard announces campaign for governor
Two-day state fly-around underscores Dillard’s leadership, record
WHO: State Senator Kirk Dillard, his wife Stephanie, their two daughters, extended family and supporters.
WHAT: Senator Dillard kicks off his 2014 campaign for Illinois Governor
WHEN: Monday and Tuesday, July 15 & 16
Monday’s Schedule
10:15 a.m. 3753 Magnolia, Chicago, IL (Sen. Dillard’s first boyhood home)
1:05 p.m. Quad Cities International Airport, 2200 69th Ave., Moline, IL
4:50 p.m. Governor Oglesby Mansion Inc., 421 W. William St., Decatur, IL (with former Gov. Jim Edgar)
Tuesday’s Schedule
10:00 a.m. Byerly Aviation, 6100 West E. M. Dirksen Pkway, Peoria, IL
12:20 p.m. 17th Street Bar & Grill, North 17th Street, Murphysboro, IL
4:45 p.m. Emery Air, 1 Airport Circle, Rockford, IL 61109
7:15 p.m. Rally with supporters - Trademark Tavern & Tap, 777 E. Butterfield Road, Lombard, IL 60148
WHY: Illinois is a great state, rich in our people and resources. We need strong leadership to renew our faith, re-imagine our possibilities and re-purpose our resolve in returning Illinois to its rightful place as the Capital of the Midwest. Senator Dillard is uniquely qualified to provide that leadership and Make Illinois Work Again.
* Twitters…
Your advice?
54 Comments
|
Show me the names
Monday, Jul 15, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From the Twitters…
The link leads to yet another story about more talk of a Downstate Democrat running for governor, without any clue as to who might ultimately be that candidate…
In preliminary discussions, among the potential names mentioned as a 2014 candidate is state Sen. Michael Frerichs, a Champaign Democrat, who’s preparing a bid for state treasurer. Phelps, who raised his profile during the guns debate, said he isn’t interested in higher office right now but didn’t fully rule out the possibility.
Lt. Gov. Sheila Simon, a Carbondale resident who showed she can win statewide support, says she’s seeking higher office, but most likely comptroller or attorney general. Her decision may rest on whether Madigan ultimately decides to run for governor.
State Sen. John Sullivan of Rushville, the assistant Senate majority leader, says he’s been asked about the possibility of a candidacy but wants to stay where he is.
“There’s been a little bit of discussion on that subject,” he said. “The gun issue has heightened that discussion.”
* Until I see a name, this is little more than a Downstate temper tantrum.
Look, petitions start going out in less than two months. A candidate would have to immediately set up a very big campaign network and raise tons of money. Running for governor ain’t easy. It’s a complicated process in a very large state.
* Related…
* Quinn to East St. Louis to announce last phase of bridge work
* Quinn says his organizing skills will lead him to re-election
* Meet Doug Truax, Dick Durbin’s potential 2014 opponent
* Johnson campaign committee changes name: The Urbana Republican’s campaign fund had been called “Friends of Tim Johnson.” Now it is known as “Middle Ground PAC,” and is listed as a leadership political action committee.
16 Comments
|
Illinois Zimmerman verdict react and etc.
Monday, Jul 15, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From a Bill Daley press release…
“The Zimmerman case underscores my concerns about the new Illinois concealed carry law. Local communities have to have a say in how we keep more people from walking around with guns, creating situations that can easily lead to tragedies like this.”
* From Gov. Pat Quinn’s Sunday appearance on CNN’s “State of the Union”
CROWLEY: Thank you. Governor Quinn let me — I’m going to give you a chance to respond to Governor Perry on trying to get jobs out of Illinois and into Texas. But first, I do want to talk to you about the Zimmerman verdict. You have seen that in your state there are demonstrations in Chicago and perhaps elsewhere. This is also a city that’s no stranger to gun violence. Is there a national implication to this verdict?
QUINN: Well, I think there is. It’s a tragic episode. I agree with Trayvon Martin’s father that his heart is broken. My heart is broken. And our faith is not broken, as Mr. Martin said. It’s important that we really look at this stand your ground law. I don’t think that’s a good law. We don’t have it in Illinois, and we don’t want it. And I think also the idea of individuals with guns that are concealed that are told by the police not to do something, violating that police order, there’s something really wrong when that happens. And I think lots and lots of people across our country feel that way.
CROWLEY: And a lot has been said, though, about the justice system and that it seems to many people sort of innately racially divided from whether someone is charged all the way through the verdict. Do you think that the American justice system is innately racist?
QUINN: Well, I sure hope not. The American way is colorblind. And you know, Dr. King 50 years ago on August 28th of 1963 talked about that goal of all of us to have a colorblind society and if our justice system needs improvement we must together, all of us, Americans, work together to straighten that out.
[Durbin react deleted because I didn’t realize the story was a year old.]
I didn’t see any major local GOP react. I’ll post if/when that happens.
* Stateline…
The case centered around whether Zimmerman acted in self defense and drew national attention to Florida’s law, which allows people to defend themselves with force if they feel threatened in their home, business, car, or a place where they “have a legal right to be.” At least 21 states have a similar law, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
While Zimmerman did not ultimately use the “stand your ground” defense in his case, Sanford police did not arrest him until almost two months after the shooting because of the Florida stand your ground rules that require police to have specific evidence to refute a self defense claim in order to arrest someone claiming self defense.
* From a 2012 study of state “Stand Your Ground” laws cited in that Stateline story…
Despite the implications that these laws may have for public safety, there has been little empirical investigation of their impact on crime and victimization. In this paper, we use monthly data from the U.S. Vital Statistics to examine how Stand Your Ground laws affect homicides and firearm injuries. We identify the impact of these laws by exploiting variation in the effective date of these laws across states over time.
Our results indicate that Stand Your Ground laws are associated with a significant increase in the number of homicides among whites, especially white males. According to our estimates, between 28 and 33 additional white males are killed each month as a result of these laws. We find no consistent evidence to suggest that these laws increase homicides among blacks.
* Eric Zorn…
It’s pretty clear jurors didn’t buy the idea suggested by prosecutors that Zimmerman actively pursued Martin, confronted him, provoked the fight that he was winning at the time the fatal shot was fired and then made up a bunch of lies to justify what he did.
Please take a deep breath before commenting. No drive-by sloganeering. Hold your tempers in check. Thanks.
82 Comments
|
The people are with him (continued)
Monday, Jul 15, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The rest of my weekly newspaper column…
One of the biggest issues Quinn harped on earlier this month when he used his amendatory veto powers to rewrite the concealed carry bill was that “guns and alcohol don’t mix.” So his veto prohibited all concealed carrying in any restaurant which also served alcohol.
“Do you think trained and licensed Illinois citizens should be able to carry concealed, loaded handguns into restaurants that serve alcohol?” respondents were asked in a Capitol Fax/We Ask America poll taken July 10.
An overwhelming 70 percent said “No.” Just 26 percent said “Yes” and only 4 percent were uncertain.
A whopping 83 percent of Chicagoans were opposed, 77 percent of suburban Cook County residents and 73 percent of collar county residents also were opposed. Support was highest among Downstaters, at 38 percent, but a majority of 55 percent still were opposed.
The General Assembly did not include the ban on carrying in restaurants in a compromise bill that failed to pass last week. The omission was sharply criticized by the governor.
A lobbyist with a gun control group confidently predicted last week that if the proposal got to the House and Senate floors it would pass easily. The poll shows why.
The problem is getting the idea to the floor. Legislative leaders don’t want to substantially alter their agreement on the concealed carry bill before the ink is even dry on the new law. But this appears to be a very powerful issue and pressure will most certainly build to move something next spring.
More on that poll here.
16 Comments
|
The people are with him
Monday, Jul 15, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From my weekly syndicated newspaper column…
Years ago, Gov. Pat Quinn told a friend of mine that Illinois voters were pretty easy to understand. Illinoisans love populism, Quinn explained, so doing populist stuff was the way to win their hearts.
And if a recent Capitol Fax/We Ask America poll is correct, then Quinn has done just that with a line-item veto of legislative salaries and benefits. At least, for now.
Earlier today,” 1,217 registered Illinois voters were told the evening of July 10, “Governor Pat Quinn used his veto powers to suspend the salaries of state senators and representatives until they come up with what he thinks is an acceptable solution for the state’s pension crisis. The governor said he did so because he was tired of waiting for legislators to fix the problem, although options available are controversial and may be unconstitutional. Some called the action a ‘publicity stunt,’ while others said they hoped the governor’s plan spurred legislators to action.”
A very strong 66 percent of respondents said they approved of the governor’s action. Just 23 percent disapproved and 11 percent were uncertain. The poll had a margin of error of +/- 2.8 percent and 28 percent of the automated calls were made to mobile phones.
The results were pretty even, with 66 percent of women and 68 percent of men approving, while 65 percent of Republicans, 64 percent of Democrats and 69 percent of independents approved. Disapproval was in the low to mid 20s for all.
The survey found that 80 percent of suburban Cook County residents, 74 percent of Collar County denizens and 68 percent of Chicagoans backed the governor’s action. The only comparative weakness was among Downstaters, but a majority of 52 percent still approved with 34 percent disapproving. I’d take those numbers any day.
Lots of folks were quoted in the media last week comparing Quinn’s move to the Rod Blagojevich legislative wars. They’re right to an extent. Blagojevich and Quinn have played from many of the same populist playbooks. The difference is, Quinn really believes in this stuff.
And keep in mind that Blagojevich was elected governor twice. He successfully played that populist card to the hilt. Battles with the General Assembly are popular outside the Statehouse.
So, we can probably expect more of this from Quinn. The public just eats it up and because his personal polling numbers are so bad and because he’s failed at so many things it’s his only clear path to political victory.
But win or lose, this veto will come with a huge legislative pricetag. Legislators have, indeed, been dragging their feet on a pension reform deal for a very long time. But they have their reasons and they understandably hate being publicly embarrassed like this. Quinn has now made some very serious and long-lasting Statehouse enemies. He probably doesn’t care. But governance — and therefore the state — is gonna suffer.
Subscribers have full crosstabs.
I’ll post the rest of the column in a separate thread.
32 Comments
|
Must-see TV
Friday, Jul 12, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* These two guys really don’t like each other, so I may break my habit of skipping the Sunday “newsmaker” shows this weekend…
CNN’s “State of the Union” Govs. Rick Perry, R-Texas, and Pat Quinn, D-Ill.
Remember this quote?…
[Gov. Pat Quinn] joked about his time with Republican presidential candidate Texas Governor Rick Perry, with whom he roomed during a trip to Iraq two years ago.
“And I had to listen to his so-called philosophy for seven days. The harshest philosophy known to man,” Quinn said.
12 Comments
|
Question of the day
Friday, Jul 12, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Rep. Dwight Kay (R-Glen Carbon) won by a little over 300 votes last year against an unknown, underfunded Democratic opponent who had no leadership backing.
Yet, now, he wants to run for House Republican Leader. As you already know, HGOP Leader Tom Cross wants to run for attorney general in case Lisa Madigan doesn’t stand for reelection. Several House Republicans are interested.
This Kay campaign is highly unusual because chamber leaders often have to take some pretty bad votes to help a member out here and there or to follow through on a deal with the other leaders. So, you just don’t usually see people from swing districts running for the top job anywhere in the country. There’s just too much danger that they’d be a one-termer and that it would cost the caucus even more money to defend them because they are the leader.
* Anyway, Kay recently sent out a glossy brochure touting his candidacy. The piece was posted on Jack Roeser’s Champion News site.
Click here to read it.
Some of the ideas aren’t bad at all, some of them are retreads. It’s a good-looking piece, but I did notice some avoidable typos, which prolly ain’t a great thing.
…Adding… Just in case you missed it when you were looking at Kay’s brochure…
NEW IDEAS: Dwight Kay wants the House Repubicans to be a laboratory of creativity, known for their innovative solutions. […]
JOB CREATOR: With our state facing record unemployment, the House Repubican Caucus would be well-served by having their leader also have real-world business experience.
Emphasis added to point out that maybe I’m wrong. Apparently, he’s running for something besides the House Republican Leader post.
* From Rep. Kay’s brochure…
* The Question: Caption?
66 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
Entirely missing the point
Friday, Jul 12, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* I agree with Steve Chapman…
The headline on last Sunday’s Chicago Tribune was stark and arresting: “A thousand shootings.” That’s what Chicago experienced in the first six months of 2013. It works out to more than five a day.
So what crime issue got Gov. Pat Quinn worked up last week? The danger posed by Illinoisans holding state permits to carry concealed firearms. “My foremost duty as governor is to keep the people of Illinois safe,” he said in issuing an amendatory veto of a bill to legalize concealed carry in the last state without it. […]
Quinn responded: “Following a weekend of horrific violence in Chicago in which at least 70 people were shot and 12 killed, this was the wrong move for public safety in Illinois.” But of those 70 shootings — or the 1,000-plus shootings that preceded them this year — it’s safe to wager that few if any involved legal weapons used by individuals legally entitled to own them. […]
Opponents, however, never tire of insisting that letting individuals tote firearms will unleash mass carnage. The Washington-based Violence Policy Center makes much of the fact that since 2007, by its count, 516 people have been killed by permit holders.
But a quarter of those were suicides, which are not a danger to public safety. Though the figure sounds high, it’s less than 90 a year — in a country with more than 50,000 homicides and suicides annually.
The number of licensees who make lethal misuse of their guns, likewise, is a microscopic percentage of the estimated 6 million people who are authorized to carry. The overwhelming majority behave in a responsible, lawful way. The people behind the epidemic of violent crime in Chicago, by contrast, don’t bother with permits and wouldn’t qualify for them.
For this group, the new law is irrelevant. Politicians who use the ongoing slaughter as a reason to oppose it only confirm that when it comes to government’s most important function, they haven’t got a clue.
Some people just hate guns and everything to do with guns, so anything that expands gun rights is viewed with hostility.
54 Comments
|
Nothing here yet
Friday, Jul 12, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* If this is “illegal,” then almost every politician in Illinois is going to prison.
The Sun-Times reports on yesterday’s House Mass Transit Committee hearings on the Metra weirdness…
Early in the nearly six-hour hearing, Joseph Gagliardo, the rail agency’s lawyer, told state Rep. Deb Mell (D-Chicago) and her fellow panel members about the request from Madigan’s office — a request the lawyer insisted was not political.
“Elected officials don’t lose their First Amendment rights to talk to people,” Gagliardo testified.
“Speaker Madigan inquired about a raise for an employee. It’s not inappropriate for an elected official to inquire about a wage increase for somebody. It’s not based on politics,” Gagliardo said.
Earlier this week, Metra Chairman Brad O’Halloran said [ex-CEO Alex Clifford] and his attorney had argued that if Clifford’s contract was not renewed, it would be in retaliation for Clifford reporting “alleged illegal conduct” to the Metra Board — supposedly political pressure involving hiring and contract awards. Before his exit, Clifford initially threatened a “whistleblower lawsuit” and was asking for more than the $718,000 package he got.
In a prepared statement released Thursday, Madigan said only that his office recommended Metra bosses give employee Patrick Ward a raise.
Madigan, who praised Ward’s academic and professional career in the statement, said he and Ward have worked together “on a variety of projects” over the past 15 years; his statement didn’t elaborate on those projects.
The discussion about the raise began with Ward contacting Madigan’s office in roughly March 2012, according to Madigan’s statement.
Ward, a Metra labor relations specialist since 2008, notified Madigan’s office that “in spite of being asked to assume expanded tasks with additional responsibilities in his position, his $57,000 salary had not increased in more than three years,” Madigan’s statement said,
“Given the information presented to my office, we forwarded a recommendation to Metra senior staff that Mr. Ward be considered for a salary adjustment. My office’s recommendation supplemented an endorsement which I understand he received from his supervisor, who concluded Mr. Ward was underpaid and that his job performance and education warranted a salary adjustment. ”
But Clifford ultimately rejected the recommendation, Madigan said. The House Speaker said he then withdrew his recommendation for the raise.
Ward is a 13th Ward guy. He asked for help and a letter was sent, then withdrawn. Ward eventually resigned.
* If anybody can tell me what the alleged crime is here, I’m all ears.
Yes, Madigan is powerful, but was Metra retaliated against for not giving his guy a raise? Nobody has once made that claim. And even if Madigan did retaliate, it’d be wrong, but likely not illegal.
I mean, seriously, writing a letter for a political supporter is now supposed to be some sort of scandal? Are you kidding me?
* Also, Rep. Mell still blames MJM for the failure of gay marriage and is Rod Blagojevich’s sister-in-law, so assigning that committee to the task of probing the Metra deal was an interesting move by the Speaker, since he undoubtedly knew his name would come up. Rep. Jack Franks had grabbed some headlines, but his committee wasn’t involved yesterday.
* Speaking of the Mell family, it appears that Rod Blagovjevich may have been right after all…
A felon convicted of bribing a public official says he and Ald. Richard Mell (33rd) were silent partners in the Joliet landfill that spurred a nasty family feud with Mell’s son-in-law, then-Gov. Rod Blagojevich, according to allegations in a lawsuit obtained by the Chicago Sun-Times.
Mell has long denied having any financial interest in the landfill, which sold for $17.7 million in 2008. But the lawsuit filed by Robert Pruim Sr. and his son, Robert Jr., in Will County Circuit Court, accuses the powerful alderman of helping create the business, taking a one-third ownership stake and then conspiring to defraud the Pruims out of nearly $3.7 million when the sale occurred. […]
The lawsuit claims Mell held meetings about the landfill deal in his aldermanic office and used his political connections to help a now-imprisoned distant relative, Frank Schmidt, become the face of the landfill business.
Because the landfill could accept construction debris from state construction projects, “neither Pruim Sr. (prior felony conviction for bribery) nor Mell (political figure and father-in-law of the governor) could be listed as ‘stated’ owners,” the court papers say. […]
Federal court documents show that Schmidt had more than $9 million in income in 2008 — the year of the sale. That same year, Mell reported a capital gain in excess of $5,000 from an “investment in F. Schmidt Corp.” on his aldermanic financial disclosure form. […]
Mell has long denied having any financial interest in the landfill deal, which was the genesis of a public dispute with the now-imprisoned Blagojevich. Blagojevich temporarily shut down the landfill in 2005, accusing Schmidt of accepting illegal waste and of promoting his ties to Mell as a way to get business.
An infuriated Mell lashed out, telling the Chicago Sun-Times at the time that a key Blagojevich adviser — the late Christopher G. Kelly — had been trading plum state government appointments for $50,000 campaign contributions. Mell later publicly apologized after Kelly threatened legal action.
Blagojevich was concerned that Mell had a hidden financial interest in the landfill. As governor, he launched a legislative assault on the landfill industry and pushed legislation that would specifically ban relatives of the governor from having any financial stake in landfills or receiving any “personal financial benefit” from waste-disposal operators.
34 Comments
|
*** UPDATED x1 *** Today’s quote
Friday, Jul 12, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From Aviva Bowen’s Facebook page…
Lemmegetthisstraight. And I’m not commenting on pro/con of Quinn’s move.
But when it comes to the promised compensation of our state legislators, we are focused urgently on the constitutionality of cutting it.
But when it comes to slashing the promised compensation of a half-million teachers, emergency responders, and public service workers with their life savings in a state pension system some say, “Meh. who knows. Let’s just do it and worry about constitutionality later.”
Aviva works for the Illinois Federation of Teachers, so she’s a bit biased, but I don’t disagree at all.
* Also, Attorney General Lisa Madigan announced within hours that she’d be looking into the constitutionality of the governor’s line-item veto. But AG Madigan has yet to publicly voice an opinion on any of the proposed pension reform plans.
That seems rather duplicitous. Madigan’s office has said that she won’t comment on an issue that could be litigated. But Quinn’s veto could very well be challenged in court.
I’m not sure I quite understand this, other than the fact that she may run for governor and wants to stay out of the pension fight.
*** UPDATE *** From the attorney general’s office…
Rich, regarding Aviva’s Facebook comment and your post, we have not publicly weighed in on the governor’s actions on the legislative pay. We simply said we were looking at issue based on questions brought to our office and raised by our lawyers.
As you noted, we have not publicly weighed in on the pension matter given the anticipated litigation once a reform measure is passed. We anticipate possibly litigation involving the governor’s actions as well, which explains why we have simply indicated we are doing a legal analysis.
42 Comments
|
Careful what you cheer
Friday, Jul 12, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* My Sun-Times column…
Pretty much everybody is cheering Gov. Pat Quinn for vetoing state legislators’ salaries out of the Illinois budget this week.
Quinn vetoed lawmaker salaries because, he said, he was tired of waiting year after year for legislators to pass a comprehensive pension reform plan.
Probably the only state politicians despised more than Quinn himself these days are legislators, so nobody is weeping for legislators’ personal financial troubles. Quinn, down in the polls and desperate for any kind of “win,” knows this is a sure-fire way to appeal to the populist disgust with the no-can-do General Assembly.
But man, is this ever a dangerous stunt.
Not even Rod Blagojevich at his most insane ever attempted this maneuver. Blagojevich fought the General Assembly tooth and nail, even at one point firing the wife of House Speaker Madigan’s chief of staff.
Blagojevich kept the General Assembly in overtime sessions month after month, fought court battles over his powers to force them to bend to his will, but never had the chutzpah to veto their salaries out of the budget.
That should tell you how extreme this ploy is.
And if this action isn’t eventually repudiated, either by the courts or by the General Assembly, it’ll probably happen again.
Here’s a plausible scenario:
The Illinois Legislature, particularly the House, is pretty divided over abortion rights. So what would happen if a staunchly pro-life governor decided to veto legislative pay until they approved an anti-abortion bill? Maybe the Legislature would override him, but maybe hardcore pro-life forces could stop a veto override motion from reaching the required three-fifths supermajority until a bill was passed.
If you’re pro-life, just reverse the scenario.
This is nothing short of legislative blackmail.
OK, you may be saying, isn’t pension reform a dire emergency worth the risk?
Well, after years of skyrocketing by about a billion dollars a year, state pension payments will rise by about $200 million next year and the year after next. That’s still a lot of money, but nothing like it has been.
Even so, the state can’t afford what it’s paying now, let alone lots more down the road.
So, you’d be right to ask, what if this veto is the only way Quinn could get the General Assembly to act?
For all practical purposes, any bill passed now won’t take effect until July 1 of next year.
So why all the rush to pass a bill that won’t take effect for almost a year? The New York bond rating agencies are screaming for action. And Illinois, with the worst credit rating in the nation, is at their mercy. Getting a law on the books will calm things down.
But there’s something else. Quinn’s budget director recently submitted a list of pension reform “scenarios” to the special legislative committee tasked with coming up with a solution. Nobody knows how much those ideas will save because the actuaries haven’t finished studying them.
It would be just plain stupid to pass a pension-reform bill before anybody even knew what it would save, but Quinn went ahead and vetoed legislator salaries even though his own new plan hadn’t even been vetted.
That’s a bit harsh.
Also, the committee has its own set of pension-reform scenarios which have been sent to the actuaries. Meanwhile, everybody has to wait around and nobody is getting paid.
How productive.
Everybody is falling for Quinn’s dangerous little stunt because it looks so deliciously justifiable. Careful what you wish for.
73 Comments
|
The Chicago way
Thursday, Jul 11, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* House Speaker Michael Madigan denied today that he pressured anybody at Metra and said he withdrew a pay raise recommendation…
House Speaker Michael Madigan is denying he pressured ousted Metra CEO Alex Clifford to give an employee a raise, according to a statement released this morning.
The speaker’s statement was released minutes before a House committee hearing on Clifford’s controversial severance package. Clifford received the parting deal after accusing the board of retaliating against him for pushing back against pressure to provide patronage jobs and contracts.
Madigan said he recommended in March 2012 that the employee, Patrick Ward, receive a merit adjustment based on his education level and job performance.
The speaker said the employee’s supervisor expressed concerns about such a request coming from Madigan’s office. “Upon learning of this, the recommendation was withdrawn,” the speaker said in a statement.
There are quite a few contributions from Ward to Madigan’s various political operations, but nothing huge.
* Meanwhile, retiring Chicago Ald. Dick Mell appears to be doing his best to grease the skids to appoint his daughter, Rep. Deb Mell, to his seat. The latest development is the decision by the chairman of the City Council’s Hispanic Caucus to not send a letter to Mayor Rahm Emanuel asking that he replace Mell with a Latino…
Ald. Danny Solis (25th) said the eight Hispanic aldermen who comprise the caucus’ executive committee are evenly divided on the issue of pressuring the mayor, given their respect for Dick Mell and their admiration for his daughter, State Rep. Deb Mell (D-Chicago), who remains the odds-on favorite to fill her father’s City Council seat.
“I’m one of the four who doesn’t think it’s a good idea, considering who Dick Mell is, the qualifications of Deb Mell, the fact the 33rd ward is 51 percent Hispanic and the fact we’ll be getting a Hispanic state representative to replace Deb Mell” if the mayor chooses her to replace her retiring father, Solis said.
Getting a Latino legislator would be a nice benefit. More…
After announcing his retirement last week, Richard Mell talked about installing his Hispanic aldermanic aide Jaime Andrade to replace Deb Mell in the Il. House. But, Solis said the retiring alderman mentioned no specific candidates during his meeting with the Hispanic Caucus.
* And Mayor Emanuel seems more than open to the appointment…
“State Rep. Deb Mell is not guaranteed the job because her last name is Deb Mell. And State Rep. Deb Mell is not excluded from the job because her last name is Mell,” the mayor said.
“State Rep. Deb Mell is not guaranteed a job in City Council because she would be the first [openly] lesbian [alderman] or because she had breast cancer. But, she’s not excluded because she would be the first lesbian and the first woman, as [far as] I know, that has breast cancer. I remind all of you [that] she was endorsed by both papers when she ran for state rep.”
89 Comments
|
Question of the day
Thursday, Jul 11, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Bill Daley is apparently on a Downstate tour and stopped at the Belleville News-Democrat for a chat…
“I know politics, I’ve been around it, I know how difficult it is, how crazy it can be,” Daley said Wednesday during a visit to the BND, which constituted a break from a long road trip he’s taking around Southern Illinois with his wife Bernadette Keller, who goes by the nickname Bernie. […]
Daley acknowledged that metro-east voters might have good reason to feel suspicious about another Chicago-area politician seeking their votes.
“All I can ask and all I can hope for is that people will give me a chance to first get to know me and get to listen to my ideas and my suggestions, who I’m about and whatever I’ve done,” Daley said. “Hopefully, they will give me that chance.”
* Video…
* The accompanying photo…
* The Question: Caption?
89 Comments
|
The real issue lost in the din
Thursday, Jul 11, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* I don’t necessarily agree with Bill Daley, but he made a valid point with his criticism of Gov. Pat Quinn’s veto of legislative salaries due to the lack of pension reform progress…
“The worst thing is that they come up with some political deal, that really has not been run through the numbers, but they do a Band-Aid (approach) and everybody gets the heck out of town and pretends they’ve solved the problem. That’s the worst scenario,” Daley said
* As I’ve been reporting for a while now, Quinn’s own actuarial analysis on his proposals (subscribe for more info) won’t even be completed until maybe tomorrow at the earliest - two days after his populist veto. The pension conference committee has decided on a framework and has submitted several proposals for actuarial analysis, but they won’t be completed for weeks.
In public, the governor demanded that the GA take action Tuesday. In private, he submitted an alternative plan that wasn’t even vetted yet. His staff also engaged in talks on a new plan that won’t be vetted for weeks.
Set aside all the heated rhetoric on both sides. The heart of the matter is that this move was fundamentally dishonest grandstanding. And that’s what makes it so Blagojevichian. Sure, it’s popular with goofballs like the Tribune editorial board…
Quinn has tried everything to get them to pass a solution.
Yeah. OK. Right.
Give me a break.
* The general public surely loves this because legislators are even more unpopular than the governor. And lots of haters will relish the schadenfreude of watching legislators whine about not getting paid.
* But what the Tribune and others out there either ignore or fail to understand is that the governor clearly back-stabbed the pension reform conference committee, which was making a good faith effort to finally bring some resolution to this problem. He chose the path of Rod to the path of governance. And that disgusts people who are doing some difficult and hard work like Sen. Kwame Raoul…
“[Quinn] knows [the conference committee] very well may come up with a product the General Assembly could take up this summer. What it can be made to look like is we failed his deadline until he took this action to suspend our pay and because he took this action, we got it done,” Raoul said.
“It’s made to look like he merits some credit for getting it done, when in fact he’s not rolling his sleeves up and getting it to the table. He ought not get credit for the work that we’re doing,” Raoul said.
Agreed.
…Adding… The SJ-R editorial board gets it…
Legislators are making progress, even if it’s not happening as fast as Quinn and others would like. For the state’s chief executive to stomp his feet and hold his breath in this way is silly, shortsighted and harkens back to the kind of ham-handed tactics of a previous Illinois governor who became a laughingstock.
In the same way that legislators are trying to be mindful of fairness to pensioners and current state workers, the governor must remember to be fair to legislators, who now seem to be trying hard to achieve a workable reform plan for Illinois.
* Related…
* Brown: Quinn, the candidate, should cede the stage to Quinn, the statesman
* Sneed: Gov. Quinn’s paycheck play a political setback — or comeback?
* Zorn: Quinn’s salary grab: Clever gambit or impotent, unconstitutional grandstanding?
* Hinz: Quinn makes shrewd political move freezing lawmakers’ pay
* VIDEO: State Representative Mike Bost on Salary Freeze, Pensions
28 Comments
|
*** UPDATED x2 *** * This just in…
Thursday, Jul 11, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* 9:58 am - The Illinois Supreme Court has ruled that the state’s parental notification of abortion law is constitutional. Read the opinion here.
React in a bit.
*** UPDATE *** From Terry Cosgrove at Personal PAC…
“Today is a dark day for the young women of Illinois. There are thousands of at risk young women who face dangers in their homes from incest, violence, drug and alcohol addiction, mental illness, and abusive parents. Under this law, these vulnerable and terrorized teenagers now will be required to inform their parents, many of whom are absent, that they are seeking an abortion and then to face the consequences, whatever they may be. Today’s decision by the Illinois Supreme Court is nothing short of heartless and cruel, and will subject many of the most vulnerable women and girls of our society to countless risks to their health and safety. With this decision, Illinois has moved in the direction of right wing states like Texas, Ohio and Wisconsin, which are doing everything possible to abolish access to a safe and legal medical procedure. Personal PAC is committed to raising and spending whatever money necessary to elect enough pro-choice Senators and Representatives, as well as a pro-choice Governor, to repeal this devastating law. Illinois needs our Wendy Davis’–brave Senators and Representatives in the Illinois General Assembly who will act to correct this terrible injustice.”
* From Planned Parenthood…
We are disappointed by the Illinois Supreme Court’s decision to dismiss a lawsuit challenging the Illinois Parental Notice of Abortion Act of 1995.
While we believe the Illinois Parental Notice of Abortion Act puts the health and safety of teens at unnecessary risk, Planned Parenthood of Illinois is committed to doing everything we can to make this new process as easy as possible for teens if the law goes into effect.
Planned Parenthood agrees that in an ideal world, parents would be involved in their teens’ health care and engaged in healthy dialogue around responsible decision making. Most teens seek their parents’ advice and counsel when making decisions about their health care. But in some cases, safe and open communication is not possible. In those cases, research shows mandatory parental notice laws do not enhance parent-teen communication. Rather, they can be harmful to teens’ health and well-being. The focus should be on giving teens the information they need to make responsible decisions and continue to encourage healthy family communication, not erecting barriers to critical health care services.
Awaiting more responses. Stay tuned.
*** UPDATE 2 *** Thomas More Society…
Illinois’ long-delayed Parental Notice of Abortion Act will finally go into effect within a matter of days thanks to the Illinois Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling this morning that the law does not violate the Illinois Constitution. Under the Illinois law, passed in 1995 but never put into effect, a parent or guardian must be notified at least 48 hours before a child under the age of 18 undergoes an abortion.
“This is a huge victory for the rights of parents not only in Illinois but in all Midwestern states,” said Tom Brejcha, President and Chief Counsel of the Thomas More Society.
The Supreme Court’s decision represents the successful culmination of an almost nine-year effort by Thomas More Society special counsel, constitutional scholar Paul Linton, to have the law enforced. Linton met with Illinois pro-life leaders at the end of 2004 to develop a strategy for reviving the parental notice law, which had languished in legal limbo for many years because the Illinois Supreme Court declined in 1995 to adopt a needed rule for confidential “bypass” hearings and expedited appeals for minor girls who were either deemed “mature” or made credible claims of family abuse. For lack of that rule, federal courts held the law to be unconstitutional and enjoined its enforcement in February 1996. Linton and several pro-life leaders enlisted then-DuPage County State’s Attorney Joe Birkett to assist in the effort. In 2006 Birkett and the Thomas More Society petitioned the Illinois Supreme Court to adopt the needed procedural rule. Shortly thereafter the Supreme Court adopted the rule needed to put the law into effect.
The American Civil Liberties Union fought against the law, despite the new rule, on other federal constitutional grounds. The Thomas More Society was involved in the litigation when Peter Breen, then its Executive Director and Legal Counsel, recruited two downstate State’s Attorneys to intervene in the case to ensure a vigorous defense for the law in the state and federal courts. The ACLU ultimately lost their final federal challenge before the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago in July 2009. Yet, a day before the parental notice law was to go into effect in late 2009, the ACLU filed a new state court lawsuit claiming the statute violated the Illinois Constitution of 1970. The state trial court rejected ACLU’s suit, but the Appellate Court reversed and sent the case back down to the trial court for further proceedings. Both the Attorney General and the Thomas More Society then filed petitions for review by the Illinois Supreme Court. Both petitions were granted in November 2011. Linton, author of a widely acclaimed legal treatise Abortion Under State Constitutions, authored the Thomas More Society’s friend-of-the-court brief on behalf of over twenty Illinois State’s Attorneys in defending parental notice. Linton also orally argued in defense of the law before the Supreme Court on behalf of the two State’s Attorneys who had attempted to intervene in the case to bolster defense of the law.
The ACLU’s repeated challenges to the constitutionality of the Illinois parental notice law had resulted in Illinois becoming a “fugitive” abortion state – a “dumping ground” for out-of-state minors’ abortions. Until now, Illinois was the only Midwest state without a parental notice or consent law in effect. This allowed thousands of abortions to be performed in Illinois on non-resident minors who crossed state lines, often accompanied by the adults who impregnated them, to evade their own state’s parental notice or consent laws.
* Catholic Conference of Illinois…
The Catholic Conference of Illinois applauds today’s unanimous Illinois Supreme Court ruling clearing the way for a 1995 parental notification of abortion law to finally be implemented.
State lawmakers approved the legislation requiring that a parent or legal guardian be notified when a minor seeks an abortion in order to protect our children from making a life-or-death decision on their own. The measure includes a waiver for those children who have been physically or sexually abused.
Special interests and legal wranglings barred the law from taking effect for 18 years, setting up the state as an abortion haven for children from surrounding states, which already have parental notification laws in place.
“With this ruling, parents across the state and the Midwest can breathe a sigh of relief with the knowledge that state law finally allows them to fully parent their children, and safeguard their lives and those of the unborn,” said Robert Gilligan, executive director of the Catholic Conference of Illinois.
Gilligan noted the decision cited other court rulings that recognize minors often lack the maturity, experience and judgment to distinguish harmful choices, as well as observing that juvenile justice systems exist for those very reasons.
The Catholic Conference of Illinois strongly supported the original legislation, lent its support to defeating the legal challenges to the law, and fought off subsequent legislative efforts to undermine the role of parents.
38 Comments
|
Second thoughts
Thursday, Jul 11, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Gov. Pat Quinn was slammed hard for populist pandering and over-reachoing on his concealed carry amendatory veto. The criticisms were mostly on point.
However, think about something for a moment. Quinn’s AV did not insert language to make it a “may issue” bill. Quinn spent a lot of time this year insisting that local governments ought to decide who could carry concealed firearms. Yet he conceded significant ground to the NRA and its allies by accepting a “shall issue” law.
The only local control Quinn included was language about letting home rule units pass their own assault weapons bans. But that meant a whole host of other gun control ordinances, including Chicago’s gun registry, would be immediately legislated out of existence.
* The proposal as passed allows concealed carry in churches, unless churches post a sign prohibiting it. Quinn didn’t touch on that matter in his AV even though he spent a ton of time railing against the bill in churches during the week between his veto and the override.
* His AV didn’t address Sheriff Tom Dart’s objections, either…
Dart said a provision giving his office 30 days to conduct background checks on anyone applying for a concealed carry permit in Cook County is a joke.
“I have absolutely no idea how we can comply with any type of process that’s going to fairly evaluate any of these people who are applying. I don’t know how,” he said.
What I’m saying is that Quinn, for all his faults, for all his populist bloviating, for all of his over-reaches, came a very long way on concealed carry. David Axelrod called Quinn’s amendatory veto “modest and sensible.” The changes were certainly modest, considering how far the governor could’ve gone.
* Unfortunately for him, Quinn’s somewhat reasonable behavior (in relation to what he could’ve done) has given Mayor Bloomberg - who has endorsed Bill Daley - a clear opening to attack the governor for being “soft” on gun control. Yeah, it may be a stretch, but Bloomberg would have the facts on his side.
Ironic, no?
* Related…
* Gun owners ask courts to allow immediate ability to carry firearms in public
* Immediate concealed-carry right sought
* IL grapples with implementing conceal-carry law
* Gun charge dismissed after concealed-carry vote
33 Comments
|
Quinn defends veto’s constitutionality
Thursday, Jul 11, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Dave Ormsby quoted Gov. Pat Quinn’s spokesperson Brooke Anderson last night on the constitutionality of yesterday’s line item-veto of legislative salaries…
“Article IV, Section 9(d) of the Illinois Constitution authorizes the Governor to reduce or veto any item of appropriations in a bill presented to him. Quinn v. Donnewald confirms that such authority extends to the line item veto of the salaries of State officials, including legislators.
“Like other State expenditures, the payment of the General Assembly is subject to appropriation. The governor has a constitutional right to apply his line-item veto to appropriation bills, and that’s exactly what he did today.”
The Quinn v. Donnewald decision is here.
* I’ve also been told that since the General Assembly has the option and the power to override the veto, then this case would be unlike Jorgensen v. Blagojevich, which found that eliminating judicial cost of living increases was unconstitutional.
And since the General Assembly has not yet attempted to override the veto, there’s also, I’m told, an issue of ripeness.
* As we discussed yesterday, the attorney general’s office is looking into the matter…
Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan said no one has formally sought an opinion on Quinn’s move yet, though a spokeswoman acknowledged late Wednesday that her office had “talked informally with the Comptroller’s office about questions pertaining to today’s actions.”
Topinka spokesman Brad Hahn told the Chicago Sun-Times the review would be undertaken by lawyers within Topinka’s office.
In a statement Lisa Madigan issued Wednesday the three-term attorney general echoed Topinka’s qualms about the constitutionality of Quinn’s move.
“The Governor’s actions raise a series of constitutional and procedural issues that have never been resolved by the courts,” said spokeswoman Natalie Bauer. “We’re looking closely at them.”
* Sen. Raoul wants to see a court challenge, but it won’t be him…
State Sen. Kwame Raoul (D-Chicago), who leads a 10-member conference committee sought by Quinn to draw up a pension compromise, also said he would like to see someone in the Legislature go to court to challenge Quinn’s “illegal” maneuver in “punishing folks, who may well have supported what he supported.” […]
But Raoul, a potential candidate for attorney general if Attorney General Lisa Madigan runs against Quinn, said it would not be him doing it. “I don’t want to give his action any more visibility and credence than it deserves,” he said.
Obviously, suing over this would be a political hot potato for the plaintiff. Former Sen. Denny Jacobs probably would’ve had the guts to do it, but he was infamous for that stuff and untouchable back home.
86 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
|
Hosted by MCS
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax
Advertise Here
Mobile Version
Contact Rich Miller
|