SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
*** UPDATED x1 - Kasper won’t ask for Burke recusal *** Question of the day

Monday, Jan 24, 2011

* Yeah, it’s late, but there’s a lot going on.

* The Question: Should Illinois Supreme Court Justice Anne Burke recuse herself from any appeal by Rahm Emanuel since her husband is (albeit unofficially) supporting Gery Chico for mayor? Explain.

*** UPDATE - 3:27 pm *** Emanuel attorney Mike Kasper just called to chat. Among other things, Kasper said he will definitely not ask Justice Burke to recuse herself.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - 47th Ward - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 2:19 pm:

    Yes. Her prominent husband is publicly supporting a candidate who stands to gain significantly if Rahm is off the ballot. That’s one potential conflict.

    And if, as I suspect, Alderman Burke is helping to finance the objectors case, then she absolutely must recuse herself.

    If she does not, she tarnishes the office. If she does, ironically, she might also be the reason the Court deadlocks 3-3, and might indirectly have the same effect as if she cast the 4th vote against Rahm.

    Weird stuff. Only in Illinois.

  2. - John Bambenek - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 2:20 pm:

    No. Just because a family member has a political opinion, it doesn’t make sense. Otherwise, Lisa Madigan would effectively have to resign her office as AG for the same reason (i.e. her dad has basically written the entire ILCS at this point).

  3. - Cheryl44 - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 2:25 pm:

    Yes. Not that I don’t agree with John B about relatives and political opinions, but if she is on the side that rules against Rahm, she loses all credibility. Even if she’s correct and it’s her opinion and not Ed’s.

  4. - VanillaMan - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 2:25 pm:

    Oh great. Now someone wants to see some kind of ethics in all this mayhem?

    Burke should show as much concern regarding politically biased interpretations of the law as been seen by Mr. Emnuel.

    It is a two way street people. Either follow the spirit and intentions of the law, or you do not.

  5. - Plutocrat03 - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 2:26 pm:

    A sticky wicket to be sure.

    If you want a wide distance from a conflict, them you recuse. I sure legal minds will hash this one out

  6. - 'Dale to HPark - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 2:28 pm:

    Of course, her husband is finished if Rahm wins. If she doesn’t recuse herself it’s corruption.

  7. - bored now - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 2:28 pm:

    yes, she should. no, she won’t…

  8. - phocion - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 2:29 pm:

    If there’s even an appearance of conflict, she should recuse herself. This case is far too high profile to do otherwise.

    Her presence in deciding the outcome could undermine the public’s confidence in the judiciary.

    If she remains on the court and she casts the deciding vote to remove Emmanuel, it would forever place a question of legitimacy over the ultimate winner in the Mayor’s race.

    The Justice must recuse herself.

  9. - SR - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 2:30 pm:

    Presumably this isn’t the first time there has been a conflict of interest. I say keep her on. I am very curious to see how she rules.

  10. - WRMNpolitics - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 2:31 pm:

    Yes, although there is no direct conflict of interest to force her recusal, there is enough of an appearance of a conflict to warrant her recusal.

  11. - Boone Logan Square - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 2:35 pm:

    Should Illinois Supreme Court Justice Anne Burke recuse herself from any appeal by Rahm Emanuel since her husband is funding the case against Emanuel? That’s where there’s a conflict of interest, and where a recusal is warranted.

  12. - 'Dale to HPark - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 2:35 pm:

    “there is no direct conflict of interest” Huh? Ed Burke losing his position as head of the Finance Committee isn’t a conflict of interest?

  13. - Patrick McDonough - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 2:36 pm:

    No Way, did Rahm cough up Amy rule for the deposition? He made a mistake. I guess I was always right on this matter. I am happy. payback is something. You can address me objector 007. We win.

  14. - You Can't Stop What's Coming - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 2:38 pm:

    Absolutely terrific.

    What goes around comes around.

  15. - Patrick McDonough - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 2:38 pm:

    P.S. Rahm is OFF the ballot like it or not! I am happy. Really happy. Super happy.

  16. - Statesman - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 2:39 pm:

    Yes- Conflict of interest if she stays on

  17. - mokenavince - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 2:40 pm:

    Common sense says she should recuse herself. But I firmly think she will not.So long Rham, and welcome back to Chicago.Once again the voters lose.

  18. - 47th Ward - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 2:41 pm:

    Mr. Objector 007, how much was Odelson charging you? How much did you pay for his representation?

  19. - Jeff Smith - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 2:42 pm:

    What would Clarence Thomas do?

  20. - Stinky - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 2:43 pm:

    Are you kidding me…this is Chicago…of course not

  21. - Logic not emotion - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 2:43 pm:

    Help me understand a bit. Isn’t it a mute point whether she actually recuses herself or not unless she might vote in Rahm’s favor? As 47th said, won’t recusing herself essentially have the same effect as voting to support the appeals court verdict against Rahm? Also, if she were to recuse herself, would she still be able to hear and comment on the case; but not rule? How does that work?

  22. - ILPundit - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 2:43 pm:

    Yes — because in this case, no vote at all is the same as a vote to uphold the majority. She can be “ethical” and still accomplish the same thing with her vote.

  23. - Caveat Emptor - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 2:43 pm:

    If she does not recuse herself, is that not grounds for appeal to SCOTUS?

  24. - Draznnl - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 2:44 pm:

    If she doesn’t recuse herself and is the deciding vote in a 4-3 decision against Rahm, expect him to go to Federal Court. It might have almost no chance, but he would probably claim that her participation in the case violated his Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment right to due process and equal protection under the law. At least I would raise the suggestion to him if I was representing him.

  25. - John Bambenek - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 2:44 pm:

    Exactly what is the conflict of interest?

    That Ald. Burke is **allegedly** funding the opposition? (I don’t recall any evidence for that.)

    That Rahm **might** remove Burke from the finance committee?

    Should Lisa Madigan recuse herself on any matters regarding redistricting because a Republican ILGA **might** cut her budget?

    Conflict of interest is a specific, defined and legal term. It involves alot more than allegations and conjecture.

    If Burke has put money into the Anti-Rahm crowd, maybe. But I could also say we spike Kilbride each and every time the law comes up before him because Mike Madigan wrote it and incidentally he put in big cash to protect Kilbride last time. We very quickly get into absurd territory.

  26. - John Bambenek - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 2:46 pm:

    Heh, if the IL Supreme Court opinion is appealed to the US Supreme Court, I’d expect them to issue a “Writ of We Give A Crap Why?”

  27. - Cal Skinner - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 2:48 pm:

    Were the two appellate judges slated by Committeeman Burke? If so, same question might be relevant.

  28. - Objective Dem - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 2:49 pm:

    If Judge Burke endorsed another candidate for Mayor, it would be a clear conflict of interest and she should recuse herself. (I don’t think she has or would)

    If Ald. Burke formally endorsed another candidate for Mayor, I don’t think she needs to recuse herself. It is not her endorsement and for all we know she may disagree. She is an independent person and should not be treated as dependent on her husband for decision making.

    If Ald. Burke has been funding the lawsuit to kick Rahm off the ballot, I think she should recuse herself. The reason is her husband then has a direct personal financial stake in the case before her. If nothing else it creates too much appearance of bias.

  29. - Statewide - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 2:50 pm:

    No, she shouldn’t. No, she won’t. It’s not even a real issue or there would already be some rule against more than one family member being in a government and/or judicial role.

    2011 already feels like we are wasting no time making sure the strange stories just keep on coming.

    Pick out the non-factual “Onion”-style news headline:

    1) Nearly-bankrupt state of Illinois passes totally goofy off-the-wall idea called “taxes” to actually pay for stuff.
    2) Bears try to win fabulous expense-paid trip to the Super Bowl by playing only half of the NFC championship game.
    3) Little-noticed panel of judges rules big-shot Chicago mayoral candidate off the ballot, “just to mess with people’s heads.”
    4) Pundits ask Illinois Supreme Court justice to recuse herself from a future case, just because “she knows someone who knows someone who knows someone.”

    Sorry, it’s a trick question.

  30. - Dave - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 2:53 pm:

    For the moment, there is a god. Kinda throw water on the whole, rules are for the little people attitude of the ballerina.

  31. - John Bambenek - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 2:57 pm:

    Statewide -

    Easy, the answer is #2. The Bears only played the 4th quarter.

  32. - Loop Lady - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 3:00 pm:

    Duh, of course, but something tells me she won’t…

  33. - centrist - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 3:00 pm:

    Ironically, if Burke recuses herself, it can only hurt Rahm, not help him. It’s simple math. In order to overturn the appellate court, Rahm needs a majority. A tie doesn’t help him. If Burke recuses, he still needs 4 votes. Burke only matters if the decision would be 4-3 with her. But if Burke were to vote against Rahm making it 4-3 against him, then it would be 3-3 without her, and he still loses. So would only matter if it were 4-3 in his favor, and she voted with him. In other words, she can only provide the deciding vote in his favor, she can’t provide the deciding vote against.

  34. - Cheryl44 - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 3:02 pm:

    You know what Dave? The word is danseur. There’s nothing at all effeminate about danseurs. Think of them as ninjas w/ a different outfit.

  35. - Loop Lady - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 3:05 pm:

    Why can’t Richie take both of the Burkes along when he rides into the sunset? I think they have held sway long enough in the State and city of Chicago…aren’t they both 70ish? Thanks for your service but…

  36. - centrist - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 3:06 pm:

    touche’ Cheryl44

  37. - wordslinger - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 3:07 pm:

    She probably can’t. That would be an admission that her husband is behind the whole thing and that she’s a puppet on a string. So no, she shouldn’t.

    A couple of things are amusing here:

    One, the contention by some that Emanuel has been trying to game the system as a big shot, and somehow Mr. GOP Joe Morris, the CBOE and the Cook County judge who made the original ruling in his favor (as well as, I guess, the dissenting appellate justice) are all in cahoots with the conspiracy.

    The second is that somehow Mayor Emanuel would just roll Eddie Burke. That’s laughable. Burke has done more favors for — and has more dirt on — more alderman than anyone, and believe it or not, the city council will not genuflect to the next mayor, no matter who it is.

    Burke also has $8 million in his warchest, and as Gov. Quinn and Dan Hynes will tell you, he’s willing to invest it, for you or against you.

    Daley and Burke can’t stand each other, but Daley was too smart to waste time and political capital going to war with Burke.

  38. - piling on - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 3:12 pm:

    It’s only a conflict if she rules in a way that benefits her interests. If she rules against them, then there is no conflict and she had no reason to recuse.

    Wordslinger (as usual) is right. If she recuses, it, arguably, creates a greater appearance of a conflict of interest.

  39. - SR - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 3:13 pm:

    ====If Ald. Burke has been funding the lawsuit to kick Rahm off the ballot, I think she should recuse herself. The reason is her husband then has a direct personal financial stake in the case before her. If nothing else it creates too much appearance of bias.====

    I would be very surprised if Ed Burke put himself in a position where his involvement could be traced like that. Back in October when he was aksing questions relevant to the residency case, he wouldn’t even mention Rahm by name. It was Gery Chico who made the connection to Rahm by repeating the same questions, with the same “purge” wording, to Kass.

    I also have to agree with those who have noted that recusing herself in this case would have negative connotations on her ability to be impartial in previous and future cases. Let her judge.

  40. - ZC - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 3:27 pm:

    Too many assumptions here (slightly off topic) that Republican judges would automatically slant anti-Rahm. Rahm is probably the most economically conservative, pro-business candidate in the mayoral. If I were a Republican, I’d favor him over the plausible contenders.

    I’d love it if somebody had the relevant particulars to define conflict of interest. Withdrawing from a case that your husband has spent money on, seems intuitive. Otherwise, it is quite vague what just is the conflict, except -appearance- of a conflict of interest. Does the law require an actual documented conflict, or just just that a bunch of people out there think there might be? The latter might set a dangerous precedent. Just how far does the chain of reasoning have to run, before outside observers can in effect argue a judge off a case? Without veery clear lines, this could become a mess. I think right now a recusal is unwarranted, barring evidence of a direct financial investment by Burke.

  41. - Matt - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 3:31 pm:

    I agree with ZC. IF the Republican judges allowed politics to affect their decisionmaking, and that’s a big IF, I’m sure they would prefer Rahm over Chico, CMB, etc.

  42. - Thoughts... - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 3:32 pm:

    Should she? Of course. It’s naive at best and disingenuous at worst for anyone to say that Ed is not neck-deep in the effort to keep Rahm off the ballot and/or defeat his campaign. No, it’s not her, but he has a vested interest and that’s a conflict for her.

    Will she? If she recuses, she puts Ed in hot water by basically admitting that he’s involved with all of this, but she gets to look ‘ethical’ and it has the same effect as voting to uphold. If she doesn’t and sides with the Appellate ruling, she gets exposed as a political hack rather than a thoughtful jurist and as a bonus, potentially opens a route to SCOTUS. It is a pickle. Couldn’t happen to a nicer couple, if you ask me.

    Of course she could not recuse and vote to overturn the Appellate Court. That could happen. And monkeys might fly out of my butt.

  43. - irv & ashland - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 3:34 pm:

    For what it’s worth, the two judges have been on the court for quite a while. I did look at results from their most recent retention to get a sense of political support, and found no real difference between the 14th Ward and everywhere else. Not that that’s the final word on whether Burke originally sponsored them, or continues to, but at any rate I found no evidence that his support was a major recent factor in their careers.

  44. - Honest Abe - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 3:34 pm:

    According to the latest candidate financial disclosure reports, Alderman Ed Burke had not contributed to any candidate for the current mayoral election cycle nor had his campaign committees done so. I think that this was a deliberate choice made with respect to Justice Anne Burke serving on the State Supreme Court and the likelihood that the residency case might be appealed before that tribunal.

    As such, I do not believe Justice Burke is obliged to recuse herself.

  45. - wordslinger - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 3:35 pm:

    –Kasper said he will definitely not ask Justice Burke to recuse herself. –

    Now that’s a slick move. The heat will really be on her to rule for Emanuel.

    Anyone ever seen the client list Ald. Burke discloses on his ethics form (yes, that is a funny phrase in context)? Many, many big hitters in the world of business.

    Anyone know if she has a history of recusing herself in cases involving his clients?

  46. - 47th Ward - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 3:35 pm:

    Interesting update Rich. I guess Kasper is saying it’s entirely up to Justice Burke to determine whether or not to recuse herself.

    That’s a nifty way to set a trap. Not sure it helps his client, but it really might put the Burkes in the old trick bag. Damned if you do, damned if you don’t.

  47. - think about it - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 3:36 pm:

    Time for the press to tell us in depth who exactly are Walter P. Maksym, Jr. and Thomas L. McMahon?

  48. - caleb hanie - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 3:38 pm:

    should she, maybe, because she only knows the true extent of her or her husbands conflicts. will she, yes, because she needs to stay holy enough to yell at the pope, and possibly because she thinks it will not matter if she recuses herself,…anyone else see the speaker weighing in on this behind the scenes?

  49. - John Galt - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 3:40 pm:

    The second is that somehow Mayor Emanuel would just roll Eddie Burke. That’s laughable. Burke has done more favors for — and has more dirt on — more alderman than anyone, and believe it or not, the city council will not genuflect to the next mayor, no matter who it is.

    That plus Burke’s $8.1 million is a compelling argument. The aldermen have been completely rolled by Daley for decades. This will be their first & best shot at grabbing some power in decades. There’s pent-up demand and they’ll at least make some kind of push for it in the first 3-9 months of a new administration. Ed Burke will position himself as the point man even if he loses his Finance Committee chairmanship.

    On another note, if one were to get very conspiratorial and go far out on a limb, I could see the Burke’s cutting a deal with Rham. If the gig is up and Rham knows that Burke was against him and thus is gearing up to go to war with him, this is Burke’s chance to throw Chico under the bus and create a truce. Justice Anne Burke votes in Rham’s favor making him mayor. This would eliminate speculation that she had any bias toward’s her husband’s alleged candidate Chico. In exchange, Rham would agree not to retaliate against Burke’s initial support of Chico and then consent to him remaining as Finance Chairman, with the understanding that Burke would at least somewhat temper a full-bore attempted power-grab by the city council.

  50. - Steve Bartin - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 3:52 pm:

    Only if Alderman Burke is directly funding the lawsuit should Justice Burke step down. Anyway, this shows the great difficulty in having a relative of a powerful politician on the Illinois Supreme Court. But, having said all this: the law is the law. It’s hard to argue that Rahm Emanuel was a resident for the previous year. So, blaming Anne Burke or Alderman Burke will not wash. For some history on Chicago’s ultimate power couple click on the link down below.

  51. - Been There - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 4:00 pm:

    ===Kasper said he will definitely not ask Justice Burke to recuse herself.===
    Its a game of math. When you need to get up to four votes to win there is no upside to taking one of the votes out of the picture from the get-go. Even if Kasper thought the odds were 100-1 that Burke would vote in his clients favor there is still a chance she does. But there is zero chance if she recuse’s herself.

  52. - Wensicia - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 4:04 pm:

    Kasper is right, why alienate the justice you want to decide in your favor? She will decide based on the law, not on outside political interests, even her husband’s.

  53. - Detail - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 4:08 pm:

    Rahm should offer a deal. Ed Burke gets to keep his police body gaurds in exchange Justice Burke keeps rahm in the race.

  54. - Loop Lady - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 4:20 pm:

    What a shock! Kasper is a good little soldier…

    But Emanuels war chest dwarfs Ed’s…what to do, what to do Mr. Kasper…cutting a deal with Burke sounds like the best strategy at this juncture…

  55. - Because I say so - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 4:20 pm:

    This Burke/Rahm deal… you’re all implying that Justice Burke is going to make a ruling as part of a deal? Call me naive but I don’t see that happening.

  56. - Rich Miller - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 4:21 pm:

    ===cutting a deal with Burke ===

    Sorry, but that’s just out of the question. You can’t cut a deal with the husband of a Supreme Court justice for her vote. You’d end up in the clink.

  57. - Obamarama - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 4:23 pm:

    ===For some history on Chicago’s ultimate power couple click on the link down below.

    Cooley is and was a complete moron. His book is a combination of public information and complete fabrications. He was an awful lawyer and an average fixer, at best. I’m not saying everything in that article is crap, but Cooley is about as reliable as a flat tire.

  58. - Honest Abe - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 4:28 pm:

    @Think About,

    Walter P. Maksym, Jr., is an attorney and Thomas L. McMahon is a police officer. Some of the people who are angriest about a double standard on residency laws are teachers, cops and firemen.

    Their identities have been discussed before today.

  59. - Rod - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 4:31 pm:

    I have met Justice Burke several times and I have never heard her make any type of political statement. The Federal Judicial Code requires a judge to disqualify themselfs in any proceeding in which their impartiality might reasonably be questioned.

    This is a decision Justice Burke has to make and Mr. Kasper was correct in not asking for Justice Burke to disqualify herself.

  60. - 47th Ward - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 4:31 pm:

    If anyone needs further proof that Rich runs the best political blog on the planet, I urge you to read the comments on this story over at Politico.

    Good God, so many stoopid people, so little comment moderation.

    Thanks again Rich, for building this site and making it so good. It really is hard to do, but it’s worth it.

  61. - D.P. Gumby - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 4:33 pm:

    “A judge should disqualify…herself in a proceeding in which the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned….”
    “reasonably” means “to the average person on the street”
    Is this discussion a “reasonable” stretch? W/o direct evidence, it is all pure speculation.

  62. - Rich Miller - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 4:40 pm:

    ===so little comment moderation. ===

    I don’t think they moderate at all.

  63. - Bill - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 4:45 pm:

    Say what you want about Ed, but Justice Ann Burke is so far above letting common political considerations taint her legal opinions. She is an honest, forthright, intelligent judge and the SC is lucky to have her. If she does rule it will be based on the law. I hate to say I told you so but it has been clear for a long time that Rahm did not live in Chicago for a year before the election. The majority rendered the correct opinion. The muni law is simple, clear, unabiguous. Rahm does not qualify to be a candidate. Some of my faith in the system has been restored.

  64. - Yellow Dog Democrat - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 5:13 pm:

    @Bill -

    I’ve been saying it too.

    And pointing out that if the candidate in question weren’t named “Rahm Emanuel”, we wouldn’t even be having this debate.

    Which, of course, is why we have the Rule of Law instead of the Rule of What’s Popular.

  65. - Anonymous - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 8:42 pm:

    Illinois Supreme Court Rule 63:

    C. Disqualification.

    (1) A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned, including but not limited to instances where: . . .

    (d) the judge knows that he or she, individually or as a fiduciary, or the judge’s spouse, parent or child wherever residing, or any other member of the judge’s family residing in the judge’s household, has an economic interest in the subject matter in controversy or in a party to the proceeding, or has any other more than de minimis interest that could be substantially affected by the proceeding; or

    (e) the judge or the judge’s spouse, or a person within the third degree of relationship to either of them, or the spouse of such a person:

    (i) is a party to the proceeding, or an officer, director, or trustee of a party;

    (ii) is acting as a lawyer in the proceeding;

    (iii) is known by the judge to have a more than de minimis interest that could be substantially affected by the proceeding; or,

    (iv) is to the judge’s knowledge likely to be a material witness in the proceeding.

    (2) A judge shall keep informed about the judge’s personal and fiduciary economic interests, and make a reasonable effort to keep informed about the personal economic interests of the judge’s spouse and minor children residing in the judge’s household.

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Pressure builds on Alvarez, McCarthy
* Final day to file!
* SEIU claims court victory on health insurance
* Question of the day
* So long, Kurt!
* Will "right to work" pop up again?
* A little bit of what's at stake this week
* More poison pills
* Time heals most wounds
* NYT looks at Griffin, Rauner
* LaQuan McDonald case: Three suggestions for state action
* Yesterday's blog posts

Visit our advertisers...







Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

* Tengami is a beautiful puzzle game now out on Android, on discounted launch
* Apple v. Samsung: the iPod patent art blunder
* Apple Watch holiday sales magic number stands at 6 million
* Sweep out all enemies with counter attacks in ‘Devil Eater’
* Nokia C1 said to have been killed and reborn
* [Deal] Get an extra battery, charging cradle, and microSD card with your LG V10
* Meizu PRO 5 Gold Edition now available in China

* Avila eager to wage 'friendly' AL Central rivalry
* Non-tender deadline looks familiar for White Sox
* Detroit Tigers make AL Central's first big splash with Jordan Zimme...
* South Side Sox' SB Nation MLB Awards voting results
* Starting Pitcher Rankings: Chris Sale and Jose Quintana maintain st...
* Scouting profile: Adam Engel
* Alex Avila will try to shed limitations with White Sox


Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0


* Gov. Rauner, Legislative Leaders Meeting Tuesda.....
* Rauner, Lawmakers to Meet for Long-Awaited Budg.....
* Sweet: Rauner says Obama's info on Syrian refug.....

* Demonstrations continue in police shooting of black teen
* Student in custody for allegedly bringing gun to school
* Correction: Closer Look-Government Consolidation story
* Man dies after trapped in central Illinois corn dryer
* Judge orders Illinois to pay home health workers' insurance
* 3rd man charged with murder in Chicago triple homicide
* Cities, counties struggle during Illinois budget mess
* 1st weekend of Illinois firearm deer hunt beats last year
* Police investigate break-ins at 4 Champaign-Urbana hotspots
* Urbana chef taps family members for his kitchen staff

* Candidates rush to beat Monday filing deadline
* Cities, counties demand action amid Illinois budget mess
* Judge orders Illinois to pay home health workers' insurance
* Cities, counties struggle during Illinois budget mess
* 'Pot doctors' pushing boundaries in Illinois, other states
* Burger King manager: Police erased video of Chicago shooting
* Local free community college plans may be template for U.S.
* Rauner faces challenges in move to block refugees
* Vendor Payment Program suspended due to budget impasse
* Rauner pardons man found innocent of 1999 attack

* Peoples' new owner urges no slowdown in high-cost pipe program
* CEO leaves struggling Broadwind Energy
* Illinois Obamacare insurer halts new small-biz enrollees
* Chicago cop's lawyer says he may post bond soon
* Chicago officer Jason Van Dyke posts bond, leaves jail

* Source: FBI finds Burger King video not altered in Laquan McDonald case
* Brown: Voters can decide whether Alvarez has to go
* Ald. Harris quietly files to challenge Dorothy Brown
* A pair of young Blackhawks players made a trip to see Santa Claus
* Time for Blackhawks to shut down Jonathan Toews, the fighter
* Top-heavy Blackhawks still seeking a depth charge
* Cop who shot Laquan McDonald due back in court
* Cop charged in Laquan McDonald case bonds out of jail
* Is Anita Alvarez losing her Hispanic political base?
* Sports Illustrated: Blackhawks whiff on Stadium Series jerseys

* Cop in Laquan McDonald's shooting freed from jail on $150,000 bond
* Student with gun, ammunition arrested at Barrington High School
* 2 men, teen, wounded during shootings on West, Northwest, South Sides
* Coca-Cola workers authorize strike at plants in Niles, Alsip
* U.S. Senate, state's attorney's races take shape on last day of filing
* Man charged in threat at University of Chicago linked to Laquan McDonald shooting
* Man convicted in 1994 shooting seeks new trial
* Prosecutors: Alleged victim of cop assault unable to identify him
* Rauner, Madigan to meet, but little progress expected on state impasse
* Special prosecutor confirms Sandra Bland case nearly complete

* Candidates rush to beat Monday filing deadline
* Cities, counties demand action amid Illinois budget mess
* Judge orders Illinois to pay home health workers' insurance
* James Durkin: Compromise needed to restore Illinois' standing
* Bernard Schoenburg: Book on Blagojevich impeachment lets reader 'be right there'
* Andy Shaw: It's time to crack down on no-bid contracts
* 'Pot doctors' pushing boundaries in Illinois, other states
* Burger King manager: Police erased video of Chicago shooting
* Kristina Rasmussen: Relying on one another, not the government
* Charles Krauthammer: The Syrian immigration cul-de-sac

* Three arrested, fourth sought, in burglary spree
* PODCAST: News Gazette Sports Page 11-30-15
* Dec. 2 Illinois basketball chat
* UPDATE: Man wanted in home invasion holed up in Rantoul
* Rantoul standoff
* UI chancellor: 'We needed some stability'
* The Latest: UIC student arrested after University of Chicago scare
* Farber on standoff
* Illini running back to transfer
* Police evacuate Eastlawn in Rantoul for nearby incident

* Parent group opposes compromise in Dist. 211 transgender case
* 5 file to run for one Lake County Board seat
* Zuccarello, Lindberg pace Rangers to 4-3 win over Hurricanes
* Lauzen, Shepro to vie for Kane chairman; Bianchi challenged
* Batavia, St. Charles North rolling entering UEC play

* House lawmakers overcome hurdle on key tra...
* Rodney Davis talks funding with Bloomingto...
* The agency that fought Illiana gets a new ...
* Rep. Dold takes educational cruise down Ch...
* Lawmakers decry high turnover rate of VA h...
* CBD Oil, and politics
* Simon considering state Senate bid
* Killer Congressman Tom MacArthur trying to...
* Shutdown? State may not notice
* Rep. Bob Dold

* Tightening L-1 Rules in Grassley/Durbin Bi......

* Manchin, Kirk introduce bill targeting gov......

* Chicago Winter Overnight Parking Ban Starts Tonight
* Officer In Laquan McDonald Shooting Released After Posting $1.5 Million Bail
* Judge: State Must Make Payments For Home Health Care Worker Insurance
* Obama's State Of The Union Address Set For January 12
* Politicians Join Call For Anita Alvarez To Resign As Laquan McDonald Case Unfolds
* Democrats make bid to take over Chicago Republican Party
* Michael Malatesta interviewed on NTNM
* 7th Subcircuit race getting crowded, other last-day filings
* Cook County Commissioner Jesus Garcia, Chicago Aldermen Call For Cook County State's Attorney Anita Alvarez's Resignation
* EXTRA: What is point of $1M bond?

* Emergency Management Officials, National Weather Service Encourage Winter Preparedness - November is Winter Weather Preparedness Month in Illinois
* Keep Your Family Safe This Winter - November through February are leading months for carbon monoxide related incidents
* Governor Takes Bill Action
* Illinois Department of Labor Director Hugo Chaviano Awards Governor’s Award for Contributions in Health and Safety to the Illinois Refining Division of Marathon Petroleum Company LP
* State Regulator Elected Treasurer of Interstate Medical Licensure Compact

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller