SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
This just in… AG Madigan’s en banc motion denied

Friday, Feb 22, 2013

* 9:13 am - I just got a call from the NRA claiming that the full Seventh US Circuit Court of Appeals has denied Attorney General Lisa Madigan’s request for an en banc hearing of the recent ruling by a three-judge panel that Illinois’ public gun carrying laws are unconstitutional. Madigan wanted all of the appellate judges to hear the case. Not gonna happen.

AG Madigan’s next step - if she decides to take it - would be to appeal to the US Supreme Court.

More when I know more.

* 9:18 am - The order denying Madigan’s en banc rehearing motion is here, including a dissent by four out of the circuit’s ten presiding judges.

* From Judge David F. Hamilton’s dissent

In so many public settings, carrying and using firearms present lethal risks to innocent bystanders. Yet when people go about their daily lives in public places, they have no choice about whether to consent to the dangers posed by firearms in public. We can all choose whether to visit homes where firearms are present.

To illustrate the dangers posed by lawful use of firearms in public, consider a deadly confrontation on the streets of New York City in August 2012, when police confronted an armed man who had just shot and killed another man. The police officers were well trained in both how to shoot and when to shoot and not shoot. The officers fatally shot the gunman, but the officers’ many shots also wounded nine bystanders.

I intend no criticism of the officers, who confronted an urgent, dangerous situation that few have experienced first-hand. We will always need armed police officers, and some harm will be unavoidable despite their training, skill, and experience. But consider how much worse the situation on the crowded streets of New York might have been if several civilians, without the officers’ training but carrying firearms lawfully, had tried to help with their own firearms.

Unless the Supreme Court is prepared to embrace the view attributed to it by the panel majority, that the Second Amendment right to bear arms does not depend on “casualty counts,” 702 F.3d at 939, we should not assume that the logic of Heller extends naturally and without qualification to firearms in public.

- Posted by Rich Miller        


52 Comments
  1. - Anonymour - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 9:16 am:

    The vote was 6-4. The opinion is up on the Seventh Circuit website. Moore v. Madigan,
    http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/fdocs/docs.fwx


  2. - Sgtstu - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 9:20 am:

    I went to the link, thank you. What is the case number ?


  3. - Oswego Willy - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 9:21 am:

    The Attorney General’s Office needs SA Alverez to be the one to litigate this in front of the SCOTUS.

    Wonder how telling them that the next step is to ignore court orders, especially if the Supremes rule against her?

    Alverez - “It is my opinion, Justices, we can, and should, just ignore all these ruling in Illinois…”

    That would be delicious.


  4. - Cyber - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 9:22 am:

    Honestly, I thought I would never see Concealed Carry in Illinois in my lifetime. Thanks to all those who worked so hard for this: ISRA, Valinda, Todd, et. al.


  5. - Anonymous - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 9:29 am:

    The four more liberal judges dissented.


  6. - OneMan - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 9:31 am:

    Since Anita’s dude assured us the feds can be ignored on this, why worry…


  7. - Anon - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 9:31 am:

    I wish that commenter who was so avidly confident in the en banc challenge would step up here.

    This has got to be game over… Not going to go to the supremes, and Alvarez seems to be standing on shaky ground, alone.


  8. - John Jacob Jingleheimer Schmidt - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 9:31 am:

    Will Lisa take defeat and step to the side?

    Not likely. She won’t let us down, this will go all the way to SCOTUS and knock down NY, NJ, and CA too.


  9. - mjrothjr - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 9:31 am:

    This ought to make the hearing in Chicago more interesting today. Anyone know if it will be live on the internet?


  10. - benji - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 9:32 am:

    12-1269


  11. - Anonymous - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 9:33 am:

    She will waste more tax payer dollars


  12. - Esquire - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 9:35 am:

    With respect to Judge David F. Hamilton and his three colleagues, get a clue!

    The dissent refers to the case bearing on the rights of citizens in Illinois, Indiana and Wisconsin to carry concealed weapons. No, it doesn’t.

    Indiana and Wisconsin legislators have already authorized forms of concealed carry permits. Illinois stands alone among the fifty states in refusing to issue such permits to its citizens.


  13. - capncrunch - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 9:46 am:

    “…consider how much worse the situation on the crowded streets of New York might have been if…”

    Alternate history is a genre for fiction writers, not judges.


  14. - Fred - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 9:46 am:

    Anyone know of data regarding how many incidents there have been in conceal carry states where in self defense a conceal carry permit holder shot bystanders? While the dissenting opinion is passionate, is there a basis in reality?


  15. - wordslinger - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 9:54 am:

    5-4, 2-1, 6-4… I’m starting to think judges are divided on this issue.


  16. - John Jacob Jingleheimer Schmidt - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 9:54 am:

    @Fred:
    CCW holders tend to be practiced. They also tend to be on the scene as a situation develops, rather than arrive on the hot scene in progress, which is a handicap facing the LEOs.

    Thus, if there are numbers to back this up, and I think that there are…
    that CCW holders involved in a shooting would have a lower percentage of taking out a bystander than would LEOs involved in a shooting.


  17. - Verbal Kint - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 9:55 am:

    Fred, that’s a good question. You would think if there were examples, the dissenters opinion would have referenced them instead of the hypothetical New York situation.


  18. - Fan - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 9:58 am:

    Im with Fred. Let’s see some facts about bystanders getting shot by accident. Is this the best example the dissenting judge could come up with? We’re the police officers supposed to hold their return fire waiting for bystanders to get out of the way, all the while hoping they don’t get shot? Put the responsibility where it belongs, the bad guy caused this, not the police.


  19. - Logic not emotion - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 10:02 am:

    As a strong second amendment supporter, I applaud this decision and believe it to be the correct one.

    Now I’m in a quandry. Do I hope that Illinois appeals to SCOTUS so the issue can be resolved nationwide with “may issue” eliminated or do I hope that the Illinois legislature finally appropriately recognizes the second amendment and passes “shall issue with preemption” legislation?


  20. - Ahoy! - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 10:03 am:

    The Court has made their decision, now let them enforce it.

    Of course the court is divided and it’s probably along party lines. I’m surprised we have a judicial system that does needs a majority for an en banc rehearing. I believe it only takes 3 judges at the Supreme Court to allow for a hearing, we should move toward that kind of system. For them to shut out a rehearing is wrong headed.


  21. - wordslinger - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 10:05 am:

    The practice of the Supremes is four justices for cert.


  22. - Skeeter - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 10:06 am:

    I expected that result.

    Lisa should never have bothered with that step. A waste of resources with little chance of success.

    I don’t see the Supreme Court taking this one. Is there a split among the circuits that I am not aware of? They may take it, but I doubt it.


  23. - Esquire - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 10:09 am:

    @Ahoy:

    Not so sure, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals vote to deny an en banc hearing was decided along party lines. Judge Rovner was an ally of Jim Thompson and is presumed to be a nominal Republican. She voted to join the dissent.

    In the US Supreme Court, it takes a minimum of four votes to approve a petition for a writ of certiorari.

    I am not confident enough to wager if the US Supremes will accept or reject the case. The Court has done several gun cases in recent years. Sometimes, they do not want to revisit familiar topics so frequently during a short period of time.


  24. - mid-level - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 10:13 am:

    I find it strange that judges, who are suppose to dispassionately interpret and uphold the constitution, are so often divided down party lines.

    Do they read the same words with ideology filtered spectacles?


  25. - SirLankselot - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 10:16 am:

    I don’t see why the U.S. Supreme Court would take up this case; nothing in it would elaborate on previous C&C rulings.


  26. - Todd - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 10:22 am:

    There is a split amoungst the circuits


  27. - D P Gumby - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 10:22 am:

    If 5-4, 2-1, 6-4 means “game over” why are you still fighting about Roe v. Wade (7-2)?


  28. - Original Rambler - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 10:22 am:

    Fan 9:58

    As to your second question, a resounding yes. You seem to be indicating that its OK for police to shoot through innocents to get the bad guy. Wow! I hope your not a LEO and I really hope that’s not what’s being taught at the academy.


  29. - 332bill - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 10:23 am:

    For those of you worried about being hit by a stray bullet from a CCW permit holder, maybe you should read this analysis about the efficiency of police officers in combat situations. In essence, police officers were found to hit the target only 25% of the time in close-range combat. I am not saying a CCW permit holder will be any better, just that officers are not as good as everyone thinks either.

    http://www.virginiacops.org/articles/shooting/combat.htm


  30. - wordslinger - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 10:24 am:

    DP, when did they stop fighting Roe?


  31. - Skeeter - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 10:24 am:

    Really Todd? Which court said no to CC?


  32. - RSW - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 10:31 am:

    The opinion is only binding in &th Circuit. I beleive most, if not all, states covered by 7th Circuit have concelaed carry laws so there is really no policy reason for Supreme Court to take case.


  33. - John Jacob Jingleheimer Schmidt - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 10:35 am:

    NJ, NYC, HI, and big swaths of CA have CCW in name only. The right CCW case in SCOTUS would be a wonderful thing.


  34. - Todd - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 10:53 am:

    2nd in kakchinsky (sp) they said no right good cause permissible

    Wollard in the 4th was won at trial on the same issue now up on appeal expect to loose it.

    The 2 also had another case two years ago saying no right outside the home so there is a split.

    I’m at a hearing in chicago


  35. - Anonymous - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 11:00 am:

    Skeeter

    None have said no but the different Circuits have varied on the rights part. I am trying to remember but NY state law was upheld to demand a “Need” while Maryland’s demand for a “Need” was kicked out. As i remember please take it with a gain of salt as to specifics but that is the end result as i understand.

    Anyone want to bet that Alvarez’s office DIDN’T know this was coming? I think that is why they had that moronic comment on tuesday.

    As for Madigan Appealing to the Supremes. I doubt it. It would look bad to lose again right before the primary. As well as i am pretty sure those May Issue states do not want this upheld by the Supremes. Look at how much Bloomberg spent in CD2 he has some influence. I think he’d have a heart Attack if NYC were forced to live under this.


  36. - Mason born - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 11:13 am:

    sorry Anonymous there was me skipped fundamentals.


  37. - B - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 11:23 am:

    As Todd says, there is clearly a circuit split. I think many people thought that the 7th decision had some language that went out beyond even some of Scalia’s language in Heller/McDonald. And the en banc decision clearly notes that Moore “presents issues very different” from those in Heller/McDonald.

    I think its very likely that the case will be appealed and cert granted and the Daley strategy on guns of endless litigation coupled with broad restrictions that they fully expect to be challenged will continue by Illinois and Chicago. And based on the recent Simon poll, by continuing to fight against concealed carry Madigan and Emanuel would be doing their job as the poll results indicate a majority of Illinoisans and Chicagoans likely don’t support concealed carry.


  38. - Jeeper - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 11:36 am:

    The 7CA dissent saying ==… but also confident that the rights do not extend to all the arms that a modern militia might need== -seems- to me (IANAL) to contradict US v Miller (1939). That decision upheld Miller’s conviction for transporting a short barreled shotgun (a gun banned by the NFA) specifically because it was -not- suitable for military use and, for that reason, not suited for -militia- use, either, and so, not protected by 2A.

    From the decision:
    In the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a “shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length” at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument. Certainly it is not within judicial notice that this weapon is any part of the ordinary military equipment, or that its use could contribute to the common defense. Aymette v. State, 2 Humphreys (Tenn.) 154, 158.

    That would imply the dissenter in this case is wrong: the Court appears to have recognized 2A as guaranteeing a right to specifically military weapons, not some crippled look-alike, in Miller.

    Granted, the current case directly involves pistols rather than long guns of any description, but the reasoning had to do with militia weapons based on currently used military weapons. Would a full size Beretta 9mm be OK but a compact version -not- be OK?

    This will be interesting.


  39. - dupage dan - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 11:39 am:

    So, for AG Madigan, it’s bascially been an up day?

    For the AG, there is little to lose by moving up to the Supremes. If they decline, she will be able to say she did her best. If not, she gets another shot at making her point. If she loses there she can still say she gave it her best shot. Since alot of her strength comes from the Chicago folks I don’t think she will be seen as weak - more like a stalwart vanquished warrior.


  40. - Jeeper - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 11:43 am:

    DPD: Absolutely. There is very little downside to this for Lisa IF she appeals. There is more downside potential to -not- appealing than there is in losing in the end.


  41. - Mason born - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 11:44 am:

    B

    I think there is a will to appeal from Emanuel and Madigan but i think the timing is off for them. If the majority on the Supremes had changed i would agree with you. I think if Obama, who has stated opposition to carry, gets to replace one of the 5 from heller then i think they would be panting to appeal. However do they risk having it affirmed right now? Could they wait a few years until court changes then try to restrict the heck out of it until they are sued and push that one to supremes? i don’t know?


  42. - Fan - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 11:52 am:

    @Rambler- I never said shooting through the bystanders, that would be pretty dumb. My understanding was the people that were hit we’re in the background. So, your still ok with the perp being about 8 feet away, actively firing at the police, and the police were not to engage an active shooter, as there might possibly be a bystander in the background? Your law enforcement career would probably end very soon if you adopt that idea.


  43. - T.O. - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 12:07 pm:

    Anyone who can put 25% of their shots on target while being shot at is doing an outstanding job.


  44. - Todd - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 12:23 pm:

    Today the 10th circuit issued an opinion in Peterson, that said there was no right to bear arms outside the home.

    So there is afurther split. Please Lisa, please appeal…….


  45. - BleugrassBoy - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 12:30 pm:

    This request for a full hearing was just a delaying tactic by AG Madigan. Even if she and the Chicago Dems got the full hearing (or even if they try to take this fight to SCOTUS) they know they are going to lose this one.


  46. - Jeeper - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 12:37 pm:

    Todd: Agree; hope she appeals.

    BUT, the differing appealate decisions will likely induce SCOTUS to take the case without need for her to appeal.

    So, it might look better for her political future to appeal and be seen as the “stalwart vanquished warrior” (as DPD worded it) rather than let someone else carry on the fight.


  47. - Skeeter - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 12:39 pm:

    Bluegrass,
    That’s an interesting theory.
    What exactly was she trying to delay? Judge Posner stayed his decision regardless of any additional request.


  48. - Jeeper - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 12:39 pm:

    OK; I kant spel…

    “appellate”


  49. - wordslinger - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 1:13 pm:

    –Granted, the current case directly involves pistols rather than long guns of any description, but the reasoning had to do with militia weapons based on currently used military weapons. Would a full size Beretta 9mm be OK but a compact version -not- be OK?–

    Justice Scalia has said in recent public forums that he anticipates upcoming cases in which the court will be legislating, um, ruling, on what weapons are covered under the 2nd Amendment.


  50. - rick carter - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 1:14 pm:

    i still say those innocent bystanders not as many would have been shot if police had revolvers when is the spray and pray with a automatic in the best instest of the public


  51. - Original Rambler - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 1:42 pm:

    Fan;

    In your original post you said “get out of the way” which to me indicated the bystanders were IN the way, i.e. in the line of fire. I don’t know the facts of the cited case but for bystanders in the background it would be a judgment call by the LEO. If in your latest scenario there is a crowd of people directly behind the bad guy, then the LEO needs to withhold fire, even at the risk of his or her own life, until safe to do so. If the LEO is unaware of bystanders behind the bad guy, then it seems appropriate for him or her to fire away.

    I was more at issue with your first scenario and it seems like we’re in agreement. I don’t want to go overboard with variations of this scenario; I need to get some work done today!


  52. - Just The Way It Is One - Friday, Feb 22, 13 @ 1:46 pm:

    Ooh…6-4 or no, with all of the hype, both State-wide and NATionally, this is a brutal loss, at present, for Lisa and her reputation. A LOT of people in Chicagoland, where A LOT of voters oppose conceal-carry, will not be pleased with her inability to pull this one out. And this widely-heralded public defeat sure won’t help her cause while she is pondering her future as remaining AG, let alone “higher” Office–if folks conclude she can’t get it done AS the AG on such a critical, hot-button-political topic, they could doubt her competence in addressing the much LARger and multiplicity of far more complex matters in a “higher” position.

    And if she lost in front of the U.S. SuPREME Court (and good luck there on THIS particular issue, Illinois being the only “odd man out” at the party of enforcement of 2nd Amendent rights), that surely TOO would stand out even FAR more so, methinks, as one UGly Eye sore/mangled and severely ruffled feather in her cap if she considered pursuit of a higher post…yet succeeding there could also be perceived as notable…but how this plays out and what she decides to do NOW WILL inDEED be interesting…


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Rauner's smart moves
* Turn on the Wayback Machine
* "RNUG" looks ahead
* Budgetary war-gaming leads to panic
* Wild tales flourishing
* Good morning!
* Yesterday's blog posts

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

          
        * Apple’s Black Friday deal: Donations to (RED) AIDS nonprofit with purchase
        * Luxury Watchmakers Cracking Down on 'Pirated' Smartwatch Faces
        * One More Line is a hypnotic, highly addictive new game
        * RHA T10i Review: Earbuds That Go Above And Beyond To Suit All Tastes
        * T-Mobile Doubles The Number Of Music Streaming Services That Don’t Count Towards Data Caps
        * What can we expect from the OnePlus Two?
        * LINE releases new match 3 puzzle game Trio

        * What Free Apps Are You Most Thankful For This Year?
        * Hootsuite’s Next Play: Ads and E-Commerce
        * Google Will Help You With Black Friday Shopping
        * FAA Will Reportedly Require Drone Operators To Have A Pilot’s License
        * Here’s how to add tap-to-wake on your Nexus 6
        * Top 20 Tech Black Friday Deals
        * Don't Try to Warm Frostbite with Friction

        * Addition of Adam LaRoche could be a slow burner for hot stove season
        * Terrerobytes: Waiting for Adam LaRoche
        * With LaRoche on board, Abreu will benefit
        * Sources: White Sox land LaRoche with two-year deal
        * Sources: White Sox land LaRoche with two-year deal
        * Sources: White Sox land LaRoche with two-year deal
        * Abreu will benefit from LaRoche's presence

        ...............


        Main Menu
        Home
        Illinois
        YouTube
        Pundit rankings
        Obama
        Subscriber Content
        Durbin
        Burris
        Blagojevich Trial
        Advertising
        Updated Posts
        Polls

        Archives
        November 2014
        October 2014
        September 2014
        August 2014
        July 2014
        June 2014
        May 2014
        April 2014
        March 2014
        February 2014
        January 2014
        December 2013
        November 2013
        October 2013
        September 2013
        August 2013
        July 2013
        June 2013
        May 2013
        April 2013
        March 2013
        February 2013
        January 2013
        December 2012
        November 2012
        October 2012
        September 2012
        August 2012
        July 2012
        June 2012
        May 2012
        April 2012
        March 2012
        February 2012
        January 2012
        December 2011
        November 2011
        October 2011
        September 2011
        August 2011
        July 2011
        June 2011
        May 2011
        April 2011
        March 2011
        February 2011
        January 2011
        December 2010
        November 2010
        October 2010
        September 2010
        August 2010
        July 2010
        June 2010
        May 2010
        April 2010
        March 2010
        February 2010
        January 2010
        December 2009
        November 2009
        October 2009
        September 2009
        August 2009
        July 2009
        June 2009
        May 2009
        April 2009
        March 2009
        February 2009
        January 2009
        December 2008
        November 2008
        October 2008
        September 2008
        August 2008
        July 2008
        June 2008
        May 2008
        April 2008
        March 2008
        February 2008
        January 2008
        December 2007
        November 2007
        October 2007
        September 2007
        August 2007
        July 2007
        June 2007
        May 2007
        April 2007
        March 2007
        February 2007
        January 2007
        December 2006
        November 2006
        October 2006
        September 2006
        August 2006
        July 2006
        June 2006
        May 2006
        April 2006
        March 2006
        February 2006
        January 2006
        December 2005
        April 2005
        March 2005
        February 2005
        January 2005
        December 2004
        November 2004
        October 2004

        Blog*Spot Archives
        November 2005
        October 2005
        September 2005
        August 2005
        July 2005
        June 2005
        May 2005

        Syndication

        RSS Feed 2.0
        Comments RSS 2.0
        WordPress

        Loading


        * Leafs Express Condolences Following Passing Of .....
        * Pat Quinn Passes..
        * Former Canucks coach, GM Pat Quinn dead at 71..
        * Hockey community shares memories of Pat Quinn..
        * Pat Quinn, 1943-2014..
        * Auditorium Theatre to celebrate 125th birthday..
        * AP Sources: Hagel resigning as Defense secretary..
        * Judge denies bid to halt state's fracking rules..
        * N.J. Lottery Misses Christie Revenue Under Priv.....
        * Illinois universities warned of 'dire' budget cuts..


        * Ex-owner of Chicago Rush football team arrested
        * Chicago archbishop apologizes for priest sex abuse
        * Monday last day to file to run for Chicago mayor
        * Champaign native named Rhodes Scholar
        * US judge to sentence reputed drug-lord lieutenant
        * Illinois universities warned of 'dire' budget cuts
        * FAA probing plane's emergency Illinois landing
        * 8.3M vehicle on Illinois Tollway this Thanksgiving
        * Waukegan looking for Ray Bradbury statue ideas
        * Church members each get $500 to do good for world

        * Rauner tackles transition agenda
        * Attorney general warns of immigration scams
        * State pension changes ruled unconstitutional; appeal to Illinois Supreme Court next
        * State to refund $60 million in retiree health care money
        * State pension changes ruled unconstitutional; appeal to Illinois Supreme Court likely
        * Illinois pension case likely headed to high court
        * Judge: Pension ruling to come Friday
        * Rauner mum on fixes for ‘dire’ state finances, wants Quinn to freeze hiring
        * Rauner mum on fixes for ‘dire’ state finances
        * Judge to hear pension law arguments today

        * Chicago archbishop apologizes for priest sex abuse
        * Guess which day Illinois roads will be most packed this Thanksgiving
        * Here's how Chicago church members are spending their $500
        * Obama's Chicago visit tomorrow will focus on immigration order
        * Chicago's neon signs shine in new book


        * NFL passes 1st big test
        * Let gov’s veto on ride sharing rules stand
        * The Watchdogs: Rauner adviser Poshard's pension bonanza
        * As prisons swell, Illinois needs wiser policies
        * Business owners seeking pot shop licenses in Illinois faced lawsuits elsewhere
        * Out-of-power comet lander deserves praise
        * Chicago on cusp of election that matters
        * Obama announcing at 10 am Chicago time Hagel resignation
        * Obama announcing at 10:10 am Chicago time Hagel resignation
        * Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel stepping down: sources


        * Fioretti turns in petitions for Emanuel challenge
        * United adds Chicago-Dublin direct flight starting next summer
        * Investigation continues into fire that killed 32 horses
        * Chicago scientist's Nobel medal for DNA discovery could fetch $3.5M
        * Cause of building collapse that injured 2 women under investigation
        * Most stop-for-pedestrian signs hit by drivers, city data show
        * Up to 3 inches of snow today as temperatures drop
        * Ferguson grand jury expected to resume deliberations Monday
        * Feds: 6 plotted to beat restaurant worker to collect $40,000 debt
        * Man, 70, dies after his car hits pole in Ashburn


        * WUIS/SJ-R Business Report: Transmission Line Meetings Planned; More Space For Senior Living
        * Part Timers & Manufacturing in Illinois Feeling a Slow Economic Recovery
        * Photographer Kari Bedford Puts "Girls In Focus"
        * Midwest Travel: Starved Rock In The Winter
        * Ears Turn To Supreme Court For Next Pensions Cue
        * Listen to State Week - November 21, 2014
        * State To Refund Retiree Health Care Money
        * Labor unions celebrate judge's ruling against Illinois pension law
        * Judge Finds Reductions In Pension Benefits Unconstitutional
        * Pension Ruling Imminent


        * Quote of the Day: Nov. 24, 2014
        * Our Opinion: Illiana project too risky for tapped-out Illinois
        * Bernard Schoenburg: Sen. Manar backs aide Watson over Cahnman, Proctor in Ward 5
        * Karen Cox: Shop for a cause
        * Andy Shaw: Protect Illinois’ FOIA law from unnecessary tinkering
        * Quote of the Day: Sunday, Nov. 23, 2014
        * Rauner tackles transition agenda
        * Attorney general warns of immigration scams
        * Deckle McLean: Plagiarism comes with a price
        * Charles Krauthammer: The climate pact swindle


        * Uncertainty fuels speculation on Ferguson decision
        * AP Sources: Hagel resigning as Defense secretary
        * 8.3 million vehicles on Illinois Tollway this Thanksgiving
        * U.S. judge to sentence reputed drug-lord lieutenant
        * Water line break causes early dismissal
        * Buffalo residents ready for melt, possible evacuations
        * Daily Digest 11/24/14
        * Jarvis’ research earns professional recognition
        * Wind advisory issued for East Central Illinois
        * Scenes from North Main Street re-opening


        * Gusty winds, snow expected in some suburbs Monday
        * Beef the new Red Bull as burger craze takes off in Hong Kong
        * Former Chicago Jesuit leader didn't report abusive priest
        * Missing Hoffman Estates girl found in Mount Prospect
        * Sources: Hagel resigning as Defense Secretary

        * Rep. Kinzinger Leads Charge in House to Co...
        * Vet, lawmaker: 3,000 troops will not be en...
        * U.S. Rep. Adam Kinzinger re-elected to 16t...
        * Rep. Adam Kinzinger Joins Eyewitness News ...
        * Kinzinger easily wins 3rd term in Washington
        * Randy Hultgren, Adam Kinzinger return to C...
        * Adam Kinzinger Defeats Randall Olsen In Il...
        * Congressman Says He’s Still Deciding What ...
        * Adam Kinzinger chosen to represent Illinoi...
        * Republicans flock to Peoria headquarters

        * Durbin Releases Statement On EPA Decision ......

        * Jackson: Menendez prods Obama over ISIS...

        * The [Tuesday] Papers
        * Abe Lincoln: Good For The Jews
        * Five Guantanamo Bay prisoners released
        * Chicago Radio Hosts Fired via Twitter - Live On-Air [video]
        * Stantis: ILL. pensions
        * Rauner team tells higher ed director to prepare for 30% budget cut
        * Chicago Elected School Board Referendum Signatures To Be Filed Monday
        * Fioretti, Garcia To Submit Signatures For Mayor Monday
        * Immigration Advocates, Elected Officials React To Obama's Executive Action
        * Decision On Illinois Pension Case Expected Friday


        * Illinois Residents Asked to Put the Tobacco Down - Support the Great American Smokeout – November 20
        * Governor Quinn Statement on President Obama’s Executive Action
        * Governor Quinn Statement on Selection of New University of Illinois President
        * Governor Quinn Statement on Senate Committee Passage of Minimum Wage Legislation
        * Governor Quinn Statement on the Installation of Archbishop Blase Cupich




            Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller