SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
A double double standard

Wednesday, Apr 30, 2014

* The Tribune editorialized on two topics today, both of which were directed at Gov. Pat Quinn and one of which was the temporary tax hike

Keep the promise that the income tax hike would be temporary.

This was the second time since mid-April that the Trib addressed this issue

Quinn already is hobbled by his flip-flop attempt to make permanent the supposedly temporary Quinncome tax increases that are set to roll back in January.

I don’t think the governor ever specifically “promised” - in public, anyway - that the tax hike would be temporary. He was always pretty vague on that topic until his budget address. Tons of articles were written over the past few years about how Quinn wouldn’t talk about what should happen with the tax. When he finally decided he was for making it permanent, that was really huge news.

And here’s how Quinn responded to a question about whether the tax hike would stay on the books the day after the tax hike bill passed

“We will deal with this one day at time, one week, one month, one year at a time,” Quinn said then. “I think our job now is to take what was passed last night and carry it out.”

But Bruce Rauner has accused Quinn of breaking his promise, and the Trib has now officially sanctioned that line of attack.

…Adding… The Rauner campaign points to statements Quinn made soon after the bill passed where he called the tax “temporary” several times. But he made no specific promise that the temporary tax wouldn’t be made permanent once it partially expired this coming January. Indeed, he was specifically asked whether he’d support making it permanent that day and that’s when he gave his “We will deal with this one day at a time,” comment from above. Watch the video by clicking here. The question was asked at the about the 15:00 mark.

* The rest of the editorial was about pensions, particularly local pensions. The paper reiterated its demand that Quinn sign the Chicago pension reform bill. This is the third time the paper has made that demand, and it has not opposed a property tax hike

Given the terrible finances of the city’s pension funds, Gov. Pat Quinn has no responsible choice other than to sign the bill, and the aldermen have little choice but to raise taxes. Barring the miraculous appearance of some substitute plan, the likeliest (and unimaginable) alternative is to let city pension funds deteriorate even further — and to send Chicago’s credit ratings even closer to oblivion.

No, we’re not happy with the prospect of higher taxes. But over the years Springfield and Chicago politicians created huge pension obligations that the funds have nowhere near enough money to pay. The consequence for taxpayers is clear. The consequence for the politicians who promised more in pension payments than Chicago could pay is … yet to be determined by voters increasingly stuck with the cost of all the pols’ retirement giveaways to public employees.

* All that despite repeated and emphatic promises by Rahm Emanuel to never raise property taxes to solve the city’s pension problems. From February, 2011

Mayor-elect Rahm Emanuel on Wednesday ruled out a property tax increase of any size […]

Emanuel’s pledge not to entertain a property tax increase of any size came in response to a question about how he planned to solve the city’s pension crisis.

A bill approved by the Illinois General Assembly over Mayor Daley’s objections would saddle homeowners and businesses with a $550 million property tax increase in 2015 unless pension concessions are negotiated or another new revenue source is found.

During the campaign, Emanuel ruled out raising property taxes that much, which would amount to a 90 percent increase. On Wednesday, he was asked whether he would entertain a property tax increase of any size. His answer was an emphatic no.

Hmm.

* Keep in mind that just about every penny of the income tax increase has been used to make the state’s pension payments. Whatever was said during the time it was passed, taxes were in reality jacked up so the state could responsibly meet its pension obligations. And just as the Tribune has been warning about what could happen to Chicago’s bond ratings if the pension bill isn’t signed into law and taxes aren’t raised, Wall Street pushed Illinois hard to raise taxes to stop its rapid fiscal decline.

So, an income tax hike to make long-neglected pension payments is a bad thing, while a property tax hike to make long-neglected pension payments is an acceptable thing?

And no specific promise of a temporary tax is labeled as a broken promise, while numerous promises never to raise property taxes to make pension payments is jettisoned into a bottomless memory hole?

I’m confused.

- Posted by Rich Miller        


37 Comments
  1. - VanillaMan - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 12:21 pm:

    It is a bit of challenge to get a handle on a governor without a handle. Or a handler.

    Everyone seems to see a need for something, but not what the other guy is proposing, not at the amount he is proposing it, not when he is proposing it, but yeah - there seems to be a need for something. But not that.

    When the Quinn governorship becomes a Hallmark movie, I recommend “Carrie” star, Sissy Spacek, portray him.


  2. - Formerly Known As... - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 12:24 pm:

    The “promise” seems fairly clear whether the words escaped his mouth in public or not.

    The “promise” exists in black and white on the bill he signed with his own hand: 3.75% on January 1, 2015.

    If not an explicit promise, it was at the very least an implicit one.


  3. - Precinct Captain - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 12:24 pm:

    ==I’m confused.==

    That’s life in the funhouse mirror that is the world of the Tribune. Who knows how they think, maybe their brains are fried after all those years of the frat house atmosphere over there.


  4. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 12:25 pm:

    ===The “promise” exists in black and white on the bill he signed with his own hand: 3.75% on January 1, 2015.===

    Do you know how many bills are passed every year with complete or partial sunset dates?


  5. - Precinct Captain - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 12:29 pm:

    ==If not an explicit promise, it was at the very least an implicit one.==

    What? Laws are renewed all the time in Congress and state legislatures all over the country. There is never an “implicit” promise that laws will go away, just that the issue will come up again.


  6. - Formerly Known As... - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 12:30 pm:

    And you are correct, Rich. This is definitely a double standard by the Trib.


  7. - Norseman - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 12:30 pm:

    Formerly, with all do respect your definition of promise and my definition of promise are different. If they could have passed that tax increase as a permanent measure, they would have. It was a political necessity, not a promise.


  8. - Dan Johnson - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 12:30 pm:

    I think the promise narrative is completely overblown.

    The GA sunsets laws all the time. Laws are on the books and schedule to expire in 10 years. Constantly. And then the GA can choose what to do.

    This was a temporary four year income tax rate. And now that that rate is ending, the GA has to decide what to do going forward.

    That’s not breaking a promise. That’s just living through the four years of the temporary income tax rates. And now, that’s over. We have to decide what to do for the next four or eight or twelve years.

    The promise was kept. The law that was passed in 2011 was a four year law. Now, we have to decide whether we want to fire thousands of teachers and social workers and doctors or if we want a five percent income tax rate. Choosing the latter isn’t breaking any promise.


  9. - Formerly Known As... - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 12:35 pm:

    There are many bills passed every with sunset dates. That’s a normal part of governing.

    But focusing on that procedural element alone ignores the broader context of what transpired.

    This wasn’t just another bill or some technical change. This bill went down to the wire, was highly controversial at the time, and was “sold” or “pushed through” that contentious environment on the premise of being “temporary”. In that regard, it wasn’t just a typical sunset provision. It was a codification of the premise underlying the entire bill.


  10. - OldSmoky2 - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 12:49 pm:

    So then do those who oppose keeping the income tax hike have another realistic way for the state to keep making pension payments? Or would they rather the state just default? Or do they have another solution other than just not paying pensions already promised (which would not stand up in court)?


  11. - countyline - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 12:54 pm:

    The promise was kept. The law that was passed in 2011 was a four year law. Now, we have to decide whether we want to cut wasteful spending or if we want a five percent income tax rate. Choosing the latter isn’t breaking any promise.

    There, I fixed it for ya.


  12. - anon - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 12:54 pm:

    I think you are missing the REAL hypocrisy here. How about the “promise” double standard with respect to paying pension benefits? Pension benefits were not just “promised”; they were promises supported by consideration of years worked and salray foregone. In other words, an enforceable contract. Breaking a contract is far worse than breaking a promise.


  13. - Bogart - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 12:58 pm:

    What Quinn said the day after it passed is irrelevant. It’s what he said to get it passed that matters. And what he said was that it was temporary. The sales pitch was the promise. Wouldn’t you feel lied to if the salesman said one thing and the fine print another? Of course you would.


  14. - Ghost - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 12:59 pm:

    repeat a lie often enough….


  15. - Formerly Known As... - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 1:02 pm:

    “This is a temporary income tax to deal with the immediate fiscal emergency our state faces; to pay the bills so we don’t have severe cutbacks in education, health care, public safety, important things that are absolutely vital to the lives of the citizens,” Quinn added.

    January 12, 2011 http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2011/01/12/quinn-defends-income-tax-hike


  16. - Mighty M. Mouse - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 1:04 pm:

    The tax increase was temporary, it will soon expire, and now we have to deal with that fact.


  17. - Bogart - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 1:06 pm:

    Here’s an idea for those who want the state to meet all current obligations. The GA and Quinn can give local governments, including Chicago, the authority to declare bankruptcy thus shedding legacy costs legally with a resulting dramatic drop in property taxes and then raise the income tax to 5%. It’s the overall tax burden that matters. Give the people a break.


  18. - Anon - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 1:11 pm:

    The “Quinn lied” narrative suits the GOP, just like their mantra that “IL has a spending problem.” They don’t let the fact that IL has the fourth-lowest spending among the states get in the way of repeating that canard at every opportunity. They surely won’t be inhibited from callng Quinn prevaricator-in-chief by the lack of any statement promising to end the tax in 2015.


  19. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 1:12 pm:

    Once again, the Tribbie editorial board demonstrates that they don’t read the news pages of the Chicago Tribune.

    Who do these guys think they are? The Wall Street Journal?


  20. - Formerly Known As... - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 1:54 pm:

    Anon - it’s not a “narrative”. It is a “fact” that Governor Quinn labeled this “temporary”. There are many more links and quotes than the one posted above. And, to be fair, Quinn was not the only legislator who clearly stated this was “temporary”.

    With that established, please consider the meaning of “temporary” - continuing for a limited amount of time : not permanent : intended to be used for a limited amount of time

    We may need to make this tax increase permanent. But the media, legislators and the public did not simply make up the notion this was “sold” on the premise of being “temporary”.


  21. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 1:55 pm:

    ===It is a “fact” that Governor Quinn labeled this “temporary”. ===

    Yep, it’s a fact. But he never once promised not to do what he has done.


  22. - okgo - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 2:14 pm:

    This is pretty simple - the law passed was to have a higher income tax rate for a few years.

    The NEW bill, requiring an entirely NEW vote and signature, would make that higher income tax rate permanent.

    Its only a “broken promise” if they were somehow going to keep the higher tax rate without ever having a new vote (which would be unconstitutional, obviously).


  23. - okgo - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 2:16 pm:

    … and just as they had to sell the last vote on making it temporary, they are selling the current vote on making it permanent.

    If you don’t want it to be permanent, don’t vote for it. That’s pretty simple.


  24. - Norseman - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 2:19 pm:

    === It is a “fact” that Governor Quinn labeled this “temporary”. ===

    If it quack’s like a duck, walks like a duck, it’s a duck. That doesn’t make it a promise. What your quote proves is that Quinn knows how to read legislation.


  25. - Dan Johnson - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 2:33 pm:

    Thanks countyline….


  26. - Precinct Captain - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 2:34 pm:

    ==“pushed through” that contentious environment on the premise of being “temporary”==

    It is clear the governor never said that. Just because some people take different views of the same piece of legislation doesn’t make one view necessarily more true than others.


  27. - Precinct Captain - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 2:38 pm:

    What I mean is that Quinn never said temporary meaning expires 2015 is when temporary ends. The same “fiscal emergency” exists today. As Norseman said, the quote just proves Quinn can read legislation.


  28. - Formerly Known As... - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 3:02 pm:

    Norseman, Precinct Captain & Rich - I can see your point. I strongly disagree with it based on the spirit and intent of what I believe was communicated at the time, but I can see it from a logical standpoint.

    Appreciate the constructive exchange, as always.


  29. - A guy... - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 3:28 pm:

    All that nuance is lost on the general public. They believe what they read in newspapers. To a person, they’d swear that this “temporary” income tax passed by lame ducks was promised to be temporary. You can rationalize it here…but not there.


  30. - Demoralized - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 3:33 pm:

    I could frankly care less whether it was labeled as temporary or not. I’m more concerned with what happens now and what happens now is that the budget blows up if the current tax rates aren’t made permanent, or at the very least extended.


  31. - A guy... - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 4:15 pm:

    Demo, that’s a much better hill to fight on than whether he promised (in so many words) or not. The side shows waste time. PQ is running out of time.


  32. - Walker - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 4:50 pm:

    Gotta say I’m with Upon Further Review on this one.

    Absent a firm plan on how we would get substantially out of the hole in five years, and absent any Republican votes on the three other bills on the floor that week which would have helped achieve solvency, the tax rate increase should not have been announced as “temporary.”

    The belief by leaders at the time was that, labeling the rate increase “permanent,”(my own preference) would have led to its political failure. Failure, IMO, would have been disastrous in the short term for the state.

    Part of its “sale” to legislators, and also to the public, was its “temporary” label.

    We should have all gotten behind the whole package, which included focused debt restructuring, spending cuts and statutory controls as well. Those, plus a slightly faster improving economy than we subsequently had, would have legitimized the “temporary” label.

    It was an all-in, do-it-all plan on both revenue and spending that was needed. It still is because we did half measures then.

    You make your political choices — you live with the later consequences.


  33. - low level - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 5:31 pm:

    Ever since the Tribune published a photograph of Madigan’s district office parking lot, I have ceased taking anything they say seriously.

    Absolutely right, Rich. They make no sense on this, nor many other issues.


  34. - low level - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 5:40 pm:

    Not to mention one of the reporters of said story who slipped his card under my door and wrote that it was important to call him.

    I live in a condo with a phone downstairs to allow guests to call and gain entrance. He did not call me from downstairs, meaning he followed someone in and was trespassing.

    I found it funny. Apparently they are not in the least interested in objective reporting any longer…only in making the case that could be portrayed as being “progressive” is bad.


  35. - liandro - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 10:01 pm:

    I’ll try this once more, and abbreviate; maybe Rich will allow it: Quinn made a campaign promise that he would veto any hike over 1%, but immediately turned around and broke that promise. He and his allies then emphasized that it was a temporary hike, which few believed was ever the intention.

    I see the pattern. I’m sure all of you do, too. Defending him is just playing semantic games. To quote the bard, “by any other name…”


  36. - a drop in - Wednesday, Apr 30, 14 @ 11:10 pm:

    And Bruce Rauner made a campaign statement to reduce the Illinois minimum wage a dollar, then made another to increase it with caveats. What’s your point?

    So many people are straining to bend this to whomever they support that I am investing in a company that makes trusses.


  37. - Mighty M. Mouse - Thursday, May 1, 14 @ 10:40 am:

    ===And Bruce Rauner made a campaign statement to reduce the Illinois minimum wage a dollar, then made another to increase it with caveats. What’s your point?

    So many people are straining to bend this to whomever they support that I am investing in a company that makes trusses. ===

    Great post!


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Mautino misses deadline
* Emanuel accepts Rauner's apology, but with a catch
* Trade secrets or hiding payrollers?
* *** UPDATED x1 - 34 Latin Kings charged *** US Attorney to announce "significant new indictments against numerous alleged gang members"
* Question of the day
* Caption contest!
* Rauner is gearing up
* Convention delegates are "not normal" party members
* I'll believe it when I see it, Lisa
* SIU's two crucial mistakes
* Sandack says no "compromising information" was accessed
* *** UPDATED x3 - VIDEO: Kennedy looked horrible *** Chris Kennedy speaks to Dems, flees without talking to reporters
* G: Blagojevich doesn't deserve leniency
* *** LIVE COVERAGE *** Democratic National Convention
* Yesterday's blog posts

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

  
* Moto Mods Developer site now open for business
* Night Mode on Twitter debuts for Android
* LeEco acquires Vizio for $2 billion
* [Deal] Google starts up its Back to School discounts
* Apple earnings on the upper end of estimates, but forecast is still bleak
* Apple's Services Revenue Up 19% on App Store, Apple Music Growth
* Apple's Q3 2016 Revenue Drops 33% in Greater China as Europe Regains Position as Second Biggest Market

* Shields shapes White Sox shutout of Cubs
* White Sox could be both buyers and sellers
* Rodon returns to White Sox after rehab start
* Chris Sale apologizes to teammates and fans, doubles down against m...
* Saladino extends White Sox magic vs. Cubs
* Third straight walk-off fuels White Sox mojo
* Saladino extends White Sox magic vs. Cubs

...............


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress

Loading


* Governor Rauner pushes for term limits at stop .....
* Rauner calls Illinois' political system rigged,.....
* Brown: Chris Kennedy outspoken on media — tight.....
* Rauner seeks fall vote on term limit amendment .....
* Rauner seeks fall vote on term limit amendment .....
* Rauner seeks fall vote on term limit amendment .....
* Rauner seeks fall vote on term limit amendment .....


* Dennis Hastert's prison release date pushed back
* Dennis Hastert's prison release date pushed back
* Driver in fiery Chicago highway crash cited by state police
* New I-74 bridge requires moving many mussels
* Court finds man charged in drive-by competent to stand trial
* Illinois won't release details of 'Chicago Fire' tax credits
* 6-year-old Chicago girl home after shot in stomach
* Excerpts from recent editorials in newspapers in Illinois
* Witness shot before murder trial to testify when it resumes
* Illinois won't release details of 'Chicago Fire' tax credits

* Auditor General Mautino misses deadline to file amended reports
* Prosecutors: Rod Blagojevich isn't 'deserving of leniency'
* High-profile Republican state lawmaker abruptly resigns
* High-profile GOP Illinois lawmaker Sandack suddenly resigns
* 2 efforts in Illinois attempt to change sex offender laws
* Rauner renews call for term limits
* Rauner-created business development group gets new name
* State costs for amendment notices likely to top $2 million
* Rauner OKs regulating police use of cell-site simulators
* Illinois Supreme Court to consider remap ballot measure

* Moody's official: Chicago's still got time to fix pension problem
* Nearly 3 dozen gang members indicted in Chicago area
* Is this the end for health care mega-deals?
* What to know about Medicare's big bundled-payment expansion
* How to save Americans money on cardiac care


* IPRA: 3 cops involved in unjustified shootings should be fired
* Man shot in West Englewood
* Woman shot in Bronzeville
* Man, 50, shot in West Englewood
* White Sox, Shields blank Cubs
* Fishing conditions look more stable: Chicago fishing
* Sweet: Park Ridge’s ‘Hill’ makes history
* Dear Abby: When do I tell date I can’t have kids?
* No matter what follows, White Sox stamped mark on 2016
* Conventional wisdom: What to watch for Wednesday


* Democratic National Convention live updates: Bill Clinton tries to make the case for Hillary Clinton
* Simon Cowell says 'America's Got Talent' was made for Northbrook teen
* Islamic State group claims France church attack that killed priest
* Chicago mothers part of appeal for gun control, police reform at Democratic convention
* Tuesday's recap: White Sox 3, Cubs 0
* Amazon opening third Chicago-area warehouse in Romeoville
* CPS: Special education programs failing despite higher costs
* Last charges dropped against anti-abortion duo behind Planned Parenthood videos
* Hillary Clinton makes history as first woman to lead major party as nominee
* 1 dead, 6 wounded in city shootings


* Mindy Swank: SB 1564 is reasonable compromise between patients' rights, providers' faith
* Catherine Rampell: The Trump Doctrine of unpredictability
* Michael Gerson: Republicans have ceded the ground on faith
* E.J. Dionne: Clinton's Philadelphia vs. Trump's Cleveland
* Auditor General Mautino misses deadline to file amended reports
* Prosecutors: Rod Blagojevich isn't 'deserving of leniency'
* Kathleen Parker: The fury of Herr Trumpf
* High-profile Republican state lawmaker abruptly resigns
* High-profile GOP Illinois lawmaker Sandack suddenly resigns
* 2 efforts in Illinois attempt to change sex offender laws


* Clinton wins historic nomination — with a boost from Sanders
* Area athletes push Legion team to state
* New administrator makes the rounds
* Media Days notes: Lovie not concerned about recruiting
* UI hoops recruit glance: Carte'Are Gordon
* Tate: Delany showing few downsides
* Portillo's to Chambana? Well...
* Funding helps GROWTH assist RI homeowners
* Sheriff: No reason to believe shooter targeted officers
* Motorcycle driver ejected in crash airlifted from Herrin Walmart parking lot


* Sanders moves to unanimously make Clinton first female prez nominee
* Man rescued from ditch after Elk Grove Village crash
* Sainz makes strong comeback in St. Charles
* Williams tempers comments suspended Chicago White Sox ace
* The Latest: Bill Clinton detailing his wife's life story

* House lawmakers overcome hurdle on key tra...
* Rodney Davis talks funding with Bloomingto...
* The agency that fought Illiana gets a new ...
* Rep. Dold takes educational cruise down Ch...
* Lawmakers decry high turnover rate of VA h...
* CBD Oil, and politics
* Simon considering state Senate bid
* Killer Congressman Tom MacArthur trying to...
* Shutdown? State may not notice
* Rep. Bob Dold

* Sen. Durbin, Mayor Emanuel, Members of Ill......

* Talk of the County - Chicago Tribune...

* They Run for the Money
* Dismantling Chicago's "Duocracy"
* If Looks Could Kill
* Daley's Disconnect
* Rahm's the Mayor, Barack's the Boss. Harold and Carol are History.
* The Other Residency Issue
* Daley's Chinese Transit Authority
* A New Mayoral Frontrunner?
* Rahm's Patience Test
* Rahma Drama


* Zika Virus And The 2016 Summer Olympics - Travel guidance for those heading to Brazil for the Olympics
* Two Cases of Legionnaires’ Disease Identified in Adams County - New admissions to Quincy Veterans' Home halted
* Serve Illinois Commission Announces $15.6 Million for AmeriCorps Programs - 32 grantees will place almost 1,600 AmeriCorps volunteers in communities
* Rauner Calls on General Assembly to Vote on Constitutional Amendment for Term Limits in Fall Veto Session
* IDNR Announces 2016–17 Waterfowl Season Dates




Hosted by MCS -- CapitolFax.com Privacy Policy -- SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax -- Advertise Here -- Mobile Version -- Contact Rich Miller