Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Poll stories
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Poll stories

Tuesday, Oct 31, 2006 - Posted by Rich Miller

I posted a bunch of poll stories late yesterday. Here’s a list with links.

* Tribune governor’s poll (44-29-13)

* Daily Herald governor’s poll (48-32-12)

* Tribune & Daily Herald Cook County Board prez race polls (Trib: 48-33 for Stroger; Daily Herald: 51-42 for Peraica)

* New polling in US House 6 & 8

Follow the links to discuss.

I originally had comments off, but this seems a good place to discuss polling in general this year, so they’re now open.

       

41 Comments
  1. - Squideshi - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 8:34 am:

    I suspect that, on election day, when many people walk into the polling place, they’re going to see for the very first time that Rich Whitney is on the ballot; and as the only alternative to Blago AND Pinka, many people will vote for him.


  2. - Juice - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 8:48 am:

    Blago’s lead has remained consistent for months. He has stuck with his game plan and executed like a pro. Four more years of health care, increased education spending, clean air, new jobs, higher minimum wage, union protection, and unhappy republican holdover state employees. GO ROD GO


  3. - Reddbyrd - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 8:59 am:

    More testimony of what a drag the Brickhead is on JudyBore….they are in virtual deadheat in downstate.
    The deadly accurate Tribune pollapalooza says:
    The survey found independent voters divided in their support for governor–29 percent for Topinka, 28 percent for Blagojevich and 24 percent for Whitney. Blagojevich also was leading Topinka in the traditionally Republican-leaning collar counties–35 percent to 29 percent–and he trailed by only 2 percentage points Downstate.
    Bye bye bye Brick
    a dead


  4. - VanillaMan - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 9:04 am:

    There is something terribly wrong if these polls are even somewhat accurate. After weeks of losing newspaper endorsements, watching friends plead guilty, and media telling it’s listeners and readers to avoid electing a soon-to-be-indicted governor, you have voters saying this?

    Are voters really this stupid? I don’t think so.


  5. - Caveat Elector - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 9:29 am:

    The Daily Herald poll is a joke! They relied on a sample of 300 voters countywide? A margin of error of 6%? There should be rules against using such a shoddy poll sample! Where did they find these people, Tony’s home precinct? I agree with the Trib poll, this ain’t even close and Tony neglected his own district race and may lose there as well!


  6. - What? - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 9:30 am:

    Where did the Daily Herald take that poll? Arligton Heights?

    I think if you average the Trib and Herald, that’s probably where the race is really at right now.

    By the way, anyone seen that photo of Peraica with Pat Buchanan on his website? Nice ’stache.

    http://www.votetony06.com/photo/photoview.asp?p=520


  7. - Sango Dem - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 9:56 am:

    Have there been any new polls in the 18th? The last one I saw was around October 12 before Stover started his radio and TV ads. The last poll showed a big trend in Stover’s favor that I have to think will continue.


  8. - Southern Illinoisian - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 10:04 am:

    So many polls, so much useless information.

    Since you asked for comments, I get to re-iterate my favorite poll disclaimer.

    All of these telephone polls under-report the opinions of affluent voters, for the simple reason that affluent voters have greater access to phone-management tools such as Caller-ID, VOIP, or cell-only options, all of which defeat attempts to solicit opinions in this manner.

    Demographers will admit that affluence typically leads to conservative viewpoints. Therefore, conservative opinions, which lean Republican, are under-reported, giving false indication of leads for Democratic candidates.


  9. - Diversity of Thought - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 10:25 am:

    http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/info-flash06.html?project=elections06-ft&h=495&w=778&hasAd=1

    This is Zogby’s latest poll on “battleground” Senate and Governor’s races (difficult to navigate)

    OCT 31
    Blagojevich - 39.6%
    Topinka - 33%
    Whitney - 16%
    Undecided - 11.4%


  10. - Jaded - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 10:40 am:

    Does anyone else get the feeling that Squideshi is actually Bill’s alter ego?


  11. - Backyard Conservative - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 10:47 am:

    Check out Real Clear Politics for their analysis with link to their poll average on governor’s race:

    http://time-blog.com/real_clear_politics/2006/10/shameless_rod.html


  12. - Niles Township - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 10:52 am:

    I am a Dem who is stunned that either 42% or 48% of voters, depending on the poll, think that Toddler is qualified to be Cook County Board Prez, He can’t hold a candle to his dad, to Danny Davis (who would have been a better choice) or even to Tony Peraica! That’s why I’m crossing the aisle to vote Peraica on this race. As my mom always has said, the masses are *sses.


  13. - Scott Fawell's Cellmate - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 11:05 am:

    Topinka is polling at 29%.

    Alan Keyes got 28%.

    Ouch.


  14. - Caveat Eligorum - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 11:16 am:

    Niles Twp:

    You have stated so many times on this blog that you plan to vote for Tony that I am starting to believe that you are a closeted Republican.

    The wonderful thing about elections is that the people get to decide whom they want to represent them, not us bloggers, as much as we wish that were true. Based on the Trib poll, the voters apparently want Todd Stroger. I disagree with your and your mom, the masses aren’t @sses, they are very smart. They are smart enough to see through the fog of deception that Tony Peraica spews forth.


  15. - Niles Township - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 11:26 am:

    Caveat Eligorum:

    Actually, I am a fairly liberal Dem who is pro-choice, anti-Death penalty, went to a very liberal college etc. I’ve voted for one GOPer for one office before. I have just had enough with the committemen, and Chicago corruption. I am only voting for Rod to get Pat which I have also said often on this blog. I am not pro-Tony as much as I am anti-the way this whole thing went down on the Dem side. The commiteemen were not representative of the vast majority of party members who would have jumped for joy over a qualified candidate like Danny Davis who has served as a congressman, county commissioner and alderman (with later two being with distinction and an above average record) and Forest Claypool as the interim prez who no doubt would have started some reforms rather than holding inagural parties as Bobbie Steele has. If the party does not get a needed lesson, then I fear it is a party that will be lost in this malaise for years. I am voting Tony to get a good Dem candidate in 4 years that I would love to be a ble to vote for! Don’t make such easy assumptions about the bloggers out here.


  16. - doubtful - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 11:27 am:

    “Demographers will admit that affluence typically leads to conservative viewpoints.” -Southern Illinoisian

    I’m not so sure that applies anymore to Chicago’s suburbs, but even if it’s a ‘given’ I’m sure if you consult those same demographers they will happily tell you that the have-nots vastly outnumber the haves.

    All they need is something to motivate them to vote.

    Another point you fail to consider is that those affluent people may be willing to answer polls. Maybe they feel like their opinion matters; maybe they simply don’t have to work two jobs and are home when a pollster calls.

    Either way, I find your generalization self-serving and inaccurate. You can find generalizations to support polling bias in either direction.


  17. - Caveat Eligorum - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 11:35 am:

    Niles Twp:

    You raise a good point here that needs to be addressed. And I appreciate that you understand that Forest Claypool was not eligible to be appointed to the ballot due to the fact that a candidate that ran and lost cannot be a candidate in the General Election.

    But the reality here is that the system was created to have the Committeemen from the 30 townships (like Niles) and the 50 Chicago Ward Committeemen appoint the candidate when there is a vacancy. You can be angry at the Committeemen for making the appointment they did (and apparently you do). But to elect an non-reformer like Tony Peraica is like cutting off your arm because you don’t like the gloves your mom bought you for Christmas. Tony Peraica is like crab-grass. Left unattended and he overtakes your lawn. Pull him out at the root and your lawn is plush.

    But Tony continues to spread his shi…er fertilizer and continues to grow, worse than any weed in the entire forest perserve system.


  18. - Avid Trib Reader - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 11:39 am:

    From the Trib article today:

    “In Chicago, where Stroger has seen a surge in support, the number of voters with an unfavorable opinion of Peraica has jumped a dozen percentage points in the last few weeks.”

    You just knew this would happen once people got a feel for the real Peraica.


  19. - Backyard Conservative - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 12:14 pm:

    Avid Trib Reader, Trib editorial today says Stroger campaign is lying about Peraica.

    http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-0610310257oct31,0,5121929.story?coll=chi-newsopinion-hed

    That might explain the poll shift. Let’s hope enough people who are fed up and reasonably informed vote Peraica for the election day poll that counts.


  20. - Avid Trib Reader - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 12:22 pm:

    Backyard Conservative:

    The poll shows that you and 15 other people read the Tribune editorials. Of those, 14 are republican voting for Tony anyway. So big deal.


  21. - Hmmmmmmmm - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 12:26 pm:

    Ummmmmmmmmmmmm

    The Herald Poll is almost two weeks old…

    Literacy is a great thing isnt’ it…


  22. - Scott Fawell's Cellmate - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 12:38 pm:

    Topinka is polling at 29%.

    Keyes got 28%.

    Ouch.


  23. - Southern Illinoisian's Neighbor - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 12:46 pm:

    In 2004, Marylander Alan Keyes came to IL for ninety days and got 28%.

    Now, lifelong Illinoisan Crazy Aunt Judy Topinka is polling at 29%.

    Ouch.

    Ouch.


  24. - Way Northsider - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 12:47 pm:

    The more one knows about Peraica, the less one likes him. Stroger is the lesser of two evils.


  25. - Polls are voodoo - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 12:53 pm:

    Looks like Dewey is gonna stomp Truman for sure, yep.

    I don’t believe any poll that uses such tiny samples as most of these do. Too easy to get the result you want instead of the truth.


  26. - Southern Illinoisian - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 12:54 pm:

    Doubtful,

    Very creative, slamming a generalization with another generalization. Of course the “have-nots” outnumber the “haves”, although, due to the Bush economy (since the MSM gives no credit), the ratio of “haves” is increasing.

    Regardless, my point regarding phone polls is still valid.

    I suppose YOU answer pollsters that call from unidentified toll-free numbers at dinner time. Now THERE’s a minority position.

    Also, if you think of a generalization that supports the opposing viewpoint that Democrat voters are under-represented in phone polls, then share it. I’d love to dissect that logic.

    Most affluent, intelligent, people recognize that there is only one poll that matters, and that’s next Tuesday. All the others are wishful thinking.


  27. - Tessa - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 1:39 pm:

    God, how I hate polls. In the end, these numbers won’t mean a darned thing. The only ones that will matter are the ones next Tuesday night after the polling places across the state close and they count the votes. I just hope more than 25% of the eligible people in this state vote.


  28. - Sango Dem - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 1:47 pm:

    Southern Illinoisan, the affluent are not the only ones likely to be skipped by phone polls. An increasing number of young people only use cell phones, which are unlikely to be polled, and the young do vote more Democratic. Also, a significant number of the working poor either don’t have a home phone or have their phone temporarily disconnected at any given time, which means they won’t be called. As someone who has done targeted calling to low income households, I can tell you that they are harder to reach than the wealthy.


  29. - Bubs - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 2:44 pm:

    The Peraica campaign is noting that in the Tribune poll, of the 484 Cook County voters the pollster says he polled, only 46 were Republicans, less than 10%, and far less than the actual demographic countywide. By contrast, 276 of those 484 voters were Democrats - 57 percent.

    I don’t claim to know anything like enough about polling to say things definitively, but if that’s true the Trib poll does look pretty bogus as to Peraica-Stroger.

    Of course, people seeing the headline won’t know it.


  30. - doubtful - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 3:26 pm:

    “Very creative, slamming a generalization with another generalization.” -Southern Illinoisian

    Actually, my whole point was anyone could fabricate generalizations to prove their point. I was just riffing hypotheticals contrary to your original assumption, with, I might add, the exact same amount of factual, supporting evidence as you gave.

    “I suppose YOU answer pollsters that call from unidentified toll-free numbers at dinner time. Now THERE’s a minority position.” -Southern Illinoisian

    I have answered polls, what’s your point?

    “Also, if you think of a generalization that supports the opposing viewpoint that Democrat voters are under-represented in phone polls, then share it. I’d love to dissect that logic.” -Southern Illinoisian

    Um, I wasn’t suggesting “Democrat” (actually it’s Democratic) voters were under represented. I was suggesting that you gave no evidence to support your claims that affluence equates to conservative tendencies and an aversion to answering polls. It was just a self-serving assumption.

    You also don’t really say how much they are under reported. What percentage of the population is “affluent?” If it’s a small percentage, like 1% - 3%, then how much does under reporting them really affect the outcome of the poll? Isn’t that what the MOE is accounting for?

    “Most affluent, intelligent, people recognize that there is only one poll that matters, and that’s next Tuesday. All the others are wishful thinking.” -Southern Illinoisian

    Everyone knows that’s the only poll that counts. It’s Republicans who are engaged in wishful thinking, though, if they don’t lend credence to the overwhelming amount of polls that show they are no longer in the good graces of the American people.


  31. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 3:48 pm:

    “Southern Illinoisan,” if you want to criticize individual polls, be my guest. But, please, polling is a long established science. It’s not 100 percent acccurate and practitioners don’t claim it to be.

    There have always been doubters. Pollsters once walked door to door. That’s where the phrase “in the field” comes from. When some pollsters started using telephones, the old timers went ballistic. Phone polling couldn’t be accurate, they bellowed. But it mostly was. And a lot cheaper and more timely than door-to-door polls.

    I’m tired of these stupid arguments about whether all polls are worthless. Move on or move out, please. We all have better things to do than educate you or read your education. The world is round and polling is mostly accurate when done properly.


  32. - Southern Illinoisian - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 3:49 pm:

    Sango Dem,

    With all due respect, if you’re doing “targeted calling to low-income households”, how the heck do you know anything about calling affluent households?

    While affluent households certainly all HAVE phones, they also have the means to identify and REJECT calls. And, most are busy enough (that’s how they get affluent in the first place) that they choose to ignore nuisance calls, which include phone polls.

    And, almost all lower-income households DO HAVE phones. I’d also challenge the number of “lower-income” households, given that the median income for a family of four in Illinois is now over $72,000/year.

    Lastly, you are correct that young people tend to vote Democrat. That’s because they haven’t gained the wisdom that comes with age. Also, they tend to talk loudly, but sleep in on election day.


  33. - Southern Illinoisian - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 3:53 pm:

    Rich, I’m sorry, but you opened the thread for debate. I’m trying to be civil, but voice my opinion. I know you don’t share it.


  34. - Bubs - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 3:57 pm:

    Why this argument? It’s down to six days. I personally think the Trib poll is defective, for the reasons I noted above (poor sampling), but all the cards will be turned over soon enough.

    I’m more concerned about the outright lying in TV attack ads, on both sides. Welcome to Illinois!


  35. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 3:57 pm:

    SI, your opinion is not based on any actual FACTS. Again, move on or move out. I have to tell you this every few months and I won’t do it again. Go start a blog for people who think pollsters are voodoo priests.


  36. - Bubs - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 3:59 pm:

    P.S. When I say “both sides,” I meant Republicans and Democrats in general. It appears to me that Stroger is the only one lying in his race.


  37. - Angie - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 5:19 pm:

    Not to try to continue the poll argument, but doesn’t it sort of depend on what type of poll is conducted? There are scientific polls and then very badly structured ones.

    The scientific ones are more accurate precisely because they are scientific. There are lots of bogus types of polls, though.

    I’m taking a pol-sci class, and the use of “push polls” was a topic that came up. Our instructor disliked them so much that when the types of polls were listed on the Powerpoint slide, that one was spelled completely backwards on purpose, just because it is a backwards and unscientific way to do a poll.

    So, if anyone has heard of baloney polls, they are probably wary of all polls, not realizing that some are better conducted than others.

    For a fun thread topic, though, Rich should run a contest to see what types of obnoxious questions could be used in push polls for our Illinois candidates. I’ll bet they’d sound identical with both mainstream candidates. Something like, “Did you realize that (insert any candidate here) received contributions from (insert name of every individual who currently has a letter of the alphabet attached to them in the unsealed indictments that just came down)?


  38. - Casey Jones - Tuesday, Oct 31, 06 @ 6:59 pm:

    According to the Tribune poll, thirty-two percent of voters thought Blagojevich would do a better job of cleaning up government corruption, compared to 27 percent for Topinka. Huh? The man who brought us federal investigations for “endemic hiring fraud”, “pay-for-play on steroids” and $1500 birthtism checks from the husbands of job seekers is viewed by nearly 1/3 of those polled as being best able to clean up government corruption?!?!? Can he recognize it? Certainly. But clean it up? The only way he’s going to manage that is to be indicted along with his whole inner circle…

    I honestly don’t know whether to lose faith in polls or the voters of Illinois.


  39. - T.J. - Wednesday, Nov 1, 06 @ 4:42 am:

    Keyes got 28%.

    Keyes polled nowhere near 28% until Election Day.


  40. - Scott Fawell's Cellmate - Wednesday, Nov 1, 06 @ 2:49 pm:

    T.J. at 4:42 a.m.

    Keyes got 28% of the vote, Topinka is polling at 29%. No one is saying Keyes polled at anything, just making the point Topinka is swirling down the drain toward Illinois-tourist Alan Keyes numbers.


  41. - Agapios - Thursday, May 17, 07 @ 4:33 pm:

    Cool.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Subscribers Only - Legislative news
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* Energy Storage Brings Cheaper Electricity, Greater Reliability
* Roundup: Testimony focuses on ex-aides loyalty to Madigan
* Uber’s Local Partnership = Stress-Free Travel For Paratransit Riders
* Some not-great state flag redesign contest feedback from WGN
* Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards
* Pritzker: Gia Biagi signals a “new era” at IDOT
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* Live coverage
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller