Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » *** UPDATED x1 *** Nothing to see here, move along
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
*** UPDATED x1 *** Nothing to see here, move along

Friday, Jul 30, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller

*** UPDATE 1 - 1:41 pm *** Oh, for crying out loud. Now Wikipedia has picked up on this bogus “Brady hacked the ILGA website” story. NBC5 and Chicagoist did so as well. Silly people. They posted their stories even though Progress Illinois has now retracted their original piece. Good job by PI, not so good by the others.

[ *** End Of Update *** ]

* Considering the massive weirdness of the Brady campaign hacking Wikipedia the other day, another seemingly related story looked kinda interesting when I saw it this week and then when Progress Illinois picked it up yesterday and ran the ominous headline: “Brady Scrubbing The ILGA Website?“…

Sen. Bill Brady’s campaign caught a considerable amount of flack yesterday for replacing factual policy positions on its candidate’s Wikipedia page with a series of canned talking points. Unfortunately, it seems the online encyclopedia isn’t the only website the Brady campaign is scrubbing. And this new allegation is far more serious.

Mark E. Wojcik, a law professor at the John Marshall Law School, penned a letter to the editor in the Windy City Times yesterday alleging that someone is trying to shield the public from Brady’s position on gay rights. The letter states that someone got the folks who run the Illinois General Assembly’s website to remove Brady’s name as chief co-sponsor of a proposed constitutional amendment (SJRCA 95) that would have prohibited the state from recognizing same-sex marriage, civil unions, or domestic partnership.

If coordinated, the effort was successful; Brady’s name is listed at the top of the amendment’s “Full Text” as having introduced the measure but does not show up on the “Bill Status” section at all. We called officials from both Illinois’ Legislative Information Services and the Senate Journal, which controls the website. Neither office knew how such a slip-up could happen and both said that the website should reflect his sponsorship. “Oh my, that should not be,” exclaimed one of the women we talked with.

Those are some pretty serious allegations. And, if true, they would warrant a full-scale probe.

In reality, though, this is a complete non-story because it is standard Senate practice on all resolutions, including constitutional amendments.

In the Senate, for whatever reason, they don’t put the original sponsor’s name in the bill actions section. Let’s look at a Senate resolution from 2007 which made Deb Shipley the Secretary of the Senate. Here is the section which lists sponsors…

Sen. Halvorson was the original chief sponsor. But her name appears nowhere in the actions section…

All it says is “Filed with Secretary.” It doesn’t say by whom. So, if Halvorson had withdrawn her sponsorship, her name would’ve disappeared from the sponsors’ section and you’d never know by looking at the actions section that she was part of the resolution’s history.

On constitutional amendments, the full text versions do list the original sponsors. Brady’s SJRCA95 is no exception.

The House does list sponsors on constitutional amendments in the actions section of their pages. But that wasn’t always the case. If you go back to the 92nd General Assembly and look at this proposed HJRCA, you’ll see that Rep. Doug Hoeft is listed as the original sponsor, but his name doesn’t appear in the actions section.

Anyway, that’s a whole lot of info to say that this is a completely bogus story. But I figured that the GA is my bailiwick so I ought to look into it.

* And speaking of vital issues of seemingly great import that turn up nothing, this story about a Smashing Pumpkins charity event piqued my interest as well

The event even attracted the attention of Gov. Pat Quinn, who appeared before the Pumpkins set to read a proclamation, naming Tuesday as Matthew Leone Day in the state of Illinois and calling Leone “a true American hero.” He also presented a check to the fund.

Rod Blagojevich used to love to go to events like that and hand out or promise state checks. So, was taxpayer money donated to the Pumpkins’ designated charity?

“No, not a state check,” responded Quinn press secretary Grant Klinzman. Turns out, Quinn wrote a check out of his own personal account.

* And speaking of Rod Blagojevich, Pat Quinn showed up late to a press conference this week and caught heck from some reporters

“I really don’t have time for this today,” complains one reporter, repeatedly, to no one in particular. “We’ve got stuff to do, and this isn’t it,” grouses another.

Finally, at six minutes to 10 the governor lopes into the room.

“Twenty-four minutes, guy,” a radio reporter chides, quite loudly, a surprising display of disrespect. Then again, any harried public schoolteacher can coax a classroom of 6-year-olds into their bee costumes and giant sun outfits and shepherd them onstage to sing about good nutrition without being this late

There are other things a governor occasionally has to deal with, and Blagojevich was often hours late, so this ain’t much of a big deal. Still, since his media coverage hasn’t been all that great lately, the guv might want to start showing up on time.

…Adding… Let’s call this one “Much ado about little, so far”

Republican newcomer Bobby Schilling is making a real contest out of his bid to unseat Congressman Phil Hare, D-Rock Island, and could yet produce an upset.

The Cook Political Report, which analyzes federal elections, has changed its rating for the 17th Congressional District of Illinois from “Solid D” to “Likely D,” a sign that Schilling’s campaign has gained some momentum. Real Clear Politics, another election analysis provider, has changed the seat from “Safe Dem” to “Likely Dem.”

There’s still a long campaign ahead before the Nov. 2 election and Hare has much more money to spend on the race. Schilling will be hoping he can ride a wave of anti-government feeling to beat Hare, although the odds are still stacked against that happening.

Hare is not a great campaigner and he’s stumbled and bumbled the past year or so. The map favors Democrats in this district, but it’s not overwhelming. Still, for Hare to go down, the Republican wave would have to be extremely large.

…Adding more… See ya

Key Findings from Recent IL CD-13 Survey July 29, 2010

The following outlines the key findings from a survey commissioned by Judy Biggert for Congress. Interviews were conducted July 27-28, 2010. The margin of error for the entire sample (n=400) is +/- 4.9% at the 95% confidence level.

Judy Biggert is in a strong position heading into October, more than doubling Harper’s vote share.
 Biggert leads Scott Harper 61% to 28%, with 10% undecided. 41% of voters are definitely voting for Biggert compared with only 10% definitely voting for Harper.
 Judy’s job approval is stellar, with 57% of voters approving of the job she is doing and only 30% disapproving.
Harper has very little definition and a rather poor favorable to unfavorable ratio.
 Harper’s favorable to unfavorable ratio is only 11% favorable: 8% unfavorable. Conversely, Biggert’s is 62% favorable: 26% unfavorable.
 Even among those who are aware of Harper (46% of the electorate), he still trails Biggert 56%-33%.
As seen in the rest of the country, the political environment has improved significantly since Harper’s previous attempt in 2008.
 In October 2008 the generic Congressional ballot in this district was tied (42%-42%). Today the generic Republican leads 47%-31%.
 Both Kirk and Brady are leading in this district as well, with Kirk leading Giannoulias 49%-37% and Brady leading Quinn 49%-35%.
Judy Biggert is well positioned to be re-elected with Harper facing a difficult political environment as well as an extremely popular and well financed incumbent. It is hard to imagine the Democratic Party and their donors becoming engaged in this race with so many vulnerable incumbents to protect.

       

19 Comments
  1. - John Bambenek - Friday, Jul 30, 10 @ 11:25 am:

    Is there any evidence that the Brady Campaign actually was responsible for the Wikipedia edits or are we saying the Brady’s neice who has a (probably unpaid) internship was acting on orders from Jerry Clarke?


  2. - Rich Miller - Friday, Jul 30, 10 @ 11:26 am:

    They defended their actions earlier this week. I should’ve made note of that in the post.


  3. - Curious - Friday, Jul 30, 10 @ 11:28 am:

    Steinberg says Senator Martinez “decided to pull the bill back from the governor and rework it.” Can she do that?


  4. - Anon - Friday, Jul 30, 10 @ 11:35 am:

    What is claimed as being “factual” material about some of Brady’s stands on issues is, at best, a stretch and at worst, outright false.

    For instance, his supposed support for teaching of intelligent design in schools has continued to be spun out of remarks he made FIVE YEARS AGO about school districts being the ultimate decision-makers on those kinds of curriculum decisions.

    But the whole thing could be a pretty slick way for a campaign to make accusations look factual in a supposed “unbiased” forum they can point people to via social media. Seems the Brady campaign is being prudent and some might say uncharacteristically “on the ball” in doing what is possible to battle their counterparts.


  5. - Patrick - Friday, Jul 30, 10 @ 11:36 am:

    Rich — what was the note on the wiki edits? Was it the “vandalism” claim or did they actually try and justify that hilarity?


  6. - Louis G. Atsaves - Friday, Jul 30, 10 @ 11:44 am:

    Your headline says it all. There is nothing here. I’m moving along!


  7. - Rich Miller - Friday, Jul 30, 10 @ 11:45 am:

    ===he made FIVE YEARS AGO about school districts being the ultimate decision-makers on those kinds of curriculum decisions.===

    Here’s what he said…

    ===Jim Leach, WMAY-AM news director and a talk show host, asked Brady on the air if it would be OK for public schools to teach “intelligent design” as a theory in science class.

    They talked about a definition of terms, and Brady said he saw intelligent design as “in other words, teaching the Bible.”

    “I think we should teach the Bible in our schools,” Brady said. “One of the basic, fundamental voids we have in our school system is bringing God into the system.”===

    Five years or five minutes ago, unless he repudiates that statement, he’s on record.


  8. - John Bambenek - Friday, Jul 30, 10 @ 12:06 pm:

    Rich-

    Oh, well in the case, fire away… but it isn’t hacking… editing the encyclopedia anyone* can edit is hardly “hacking”…


  9. - Indeedy - Friday, Jul 30, 10 @ 12:19 pm:

    I understand that chief sponsors are not named on the SJRCA “File with Secretary” lines. It’s goofy but it’s consistent. But what about a “Removed” line? I think it’s implied with “Chief Sponsor Changed” but just curious if there’s another action line that is typically used but wasn’t in this case. Might explain the claim, though I would have expected a law professor to pony up something more than just a said-so letter.


  10. - Anon - Friday, Jul 30, 10 @ 12:20 pm:

    I don’t understand the ILGA story….it looks like one person took over sponsorship of a bill, which would seem legal.


  11. - Rich Miller - Friday, Jul 30, 10 @ 12:31 pm:

    ===just curious if there’s another action line that is typically used but wasn’t in this case===

    Nope.


  12. - wordslinger - Friday, Jul 30, 10 @ 12:37 pm:

    If the media is honked off about waiting 24 minutes for a presser, Quinn can just have availabilities out and about the state and make them lug their gear around.


  13. - in the know - Friday, Jul 30, 10 @ 12:38 pm:

    seems like i remember Brady shifting sponsorship on a whole lot of his more controversial bills to others presumably to avoid cullerton forcing a public hearing on them. didn’t he do the same thing with a budget bill? he and the campaign aren’t trying to hide their positions, simply fight on the battlegrounds of their choosing (a Quinn debate rather than a Cullerton exec. committee) Seems shrewd to me.


  14. - Ghost - Friday, Jul 30, 10 @ 12:41 pm:

    Brady knows the truth of things, and the only thing he has to fear is the truth.

    It is disheartening how Brady is working to falsify his positions to get elected. Anyone hoping for a reformer or change should consider the great lenghts to which he is going to conceal his policy positions and actions to date.


  15. - Newsclown - Friday, Jul 30, 10 @ 12:48 pm:

    Nobody in the public is going to cry for the reporters complaining about the gov being late. At least Quinn won’t be found hiding in a bathroom, right? The guy is over-scheduled, and when you do that, one delay in the front of the chain gets magnified thru the day. If he went to fewer events every day, he’d have more margin for being on time. Being late to everything has the upside of forcing all the speeches to be shorter. But after Blago’s Olympic-level tardiness, really, what is there to complain about?


  16. - Patrick - Friday, Jul 30, 10 @ 12:55 pm:

    Rich, could you at least put up Team Brady’s statement on the Wikipedia “scandal” on the OP or in the comments here? I’m deeply curious :)

    https://capitolfax.com/2010/07/28/stupid-internet-tricks/


  17. - Cincinnatus - Friday, Jul 30, 10 @ 1:15 pm:

    Normally, being late at events are a result of:

    An undisciplined candidate
    An overambitious staff
    Acts of God beyond anyone’s control

    Ignoring the third, the other two speaks to a candidate’s executive ability. Nothing pee-pees me more than trying to shepherd my candidates to their scheduled events because he is over-working the room or deviating from his planned remarks with personal anecdotes or whatever. Same goes when the staff schedules 100 events in a day, forgetting about traffic, the idiot factor, etc.

    But anyway you look at it, the buck stops with the candidate. Rudeness (late event starts) doesn’t play well.


  18. - Niles Township - Friday, Jul 30, 10 @ 1:22 pm:

    I’m all for being critical of the governor in editorial pieces, but the media’s critique of the governor for being 24 minutes late to a news conference is both absurd and demeaning to the office of governor. That radio reporter should be taught a lesson in manners. If I knew the station, I would be calling right now with a gripe.


  19. - Newsclown - Friday, Jul 30, 10 @ 6:07 pm:

    Arranged press conferences are all a big kabuki show anyhow. The whole thing runs to a rote formula, both the statements and the very obvious questions asked. You can see a number of reporters have written the story in advance and are impatient to get the sound clip that fills the pre-planned hole in their prepared narratives. You can hear it in the way they phrase their questions. And they often don’t press very hard with follow-up questions. There are always exceptions, of course, but they shouldn’t BE exceptions. Unfortunately, not all of them are as tenacious as Miller and his musketeers.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Trump border czar pick has message for Pritzker: 'Game on'
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Update to today's edition
* Unsurprisingly, Pritzker continues to bat away presidential questions
* Republicans upset about Pritzker's 'You come for my people, you come through me' comment
* Pritzker, Welch talk Trump
* New rules (Updated)
* Madigan trial Roundup: Defense cross-examines ex-ComEd executive
* It’s just a bill
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller