Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Today’s number
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Today’s number

Thursday, Feb 28, 2013

* The Tribune totals up Mayor Bloomberg’s spending in the 2nd Congressional District special primary

Independence USA’s overall spending, which also included some direct-mail pieces, was equivalent to about $72.23 for each vote Kelly received, based on unofficial vote totals in the low-turnout election.

By comparison, a CNN analysis found that Obama and his allies spent the equivalent of $25.33 per vote to win the battleground state of Ohio last year, while Republican nominee Mitt Romney and his allies spent $30.60 per vote in that state.

Thoughts?

- Posted by Rich Miller        

20 Comments
  1. - Nieva - Thursday, Feb 28, 13 @ 12:58 pm:

    We have become a country of only the wealthy or people with wealthy sponsors being elected. How can this be a government of the people?


  2. - Hank - Thursday, Feb 28, 13 @ 1:15 pm:

    Ironic that JJJ may have tried to buy a senate seat, but Bloomberg bought his old congressional seat


  3. - Just Observing - Thursday, Feb 28, 13 @ 1:29 pm:

    Well… it’s not a great comparison. Turnout was so low in this special election, especially compared to a Prez election, that the cost per vote is certainly going to be higher.


  4. - Mason born - Thursday, Feb 28, 13 @ 1:30 pm:

    Actually i think it is funny Bloomberg spent that much on a race she probably would have won without him. What do they say a fool and his money?


  5. - dupage dan - Thursday, Feb 28, 13 @ 1:33 pm:

    We need Bloomberg to spend even more money in Illinois on various campaigns. Good for the local economy.


  6. - wordslinger - Thursday, Feb 28, 13 @ 1:40 pm:

    No matter your politics, its alarming and unhealthy that big money can swamp the field like that.

    But to the Big Five Supremes, that’s just free speech in action. Free, it ain’t, when the arena is television.

    Expect a lot more of the same.


  7. - Amalia - Thursday, Feb 28, 13 @ 1:40 pm:

    who are the consultants making a Bloomberg dividend?


  8. - ndaggerscfo - Thursday, Feb 28, 13 @ 1:46 pm:

    Here’s the thing, these numbers are very misleading.

    (1) it is an off-year special election in the middle of winter, which means turnout was abysmal. Had this been the 2012 general and Kelly won as many votes as JJJ it would have cost them $12 per vote.

    (2) Chicago is the third most expensive media market in the country. Had this race been in a smaller market they could have spent less and got just as many points on broadcast.

    (3) It is hard to attack Bloomberg for this strategy, when over the past three election cycles (08, 10, 12) the NRA has spent just shy of $50m on IEs, another $2.5m on direct PAC contributions, and none of these include member-to-member contact.


  9. - Mason born - Thursday, Feb 28, 13 @ 1:53 pm:

    DD

    Great point didn’t think of that hey Bloomy there is a city council race somewhere here in il needs your help.


  10. - wordslinger - Thursday, Feb 28, 13 @ 2:00 pm:

    –What do they say a fool and his money?–

    In this case, that he has another $25 billion. Two million ain’t beer money.


  11. - Hatless - Thursday, Feb 28, 13 @ 2:06 pm:

    Bertrand Russell said the money is only good up to a certain point and after that it can only buy power.

    And they wonder why people are disillusioned and feel powerless.


  12. - soccermom - Thursday, Feb 28, 13 @ 2:24 pm:

    STL is eating his Wheaties today.


  13. - soccermom - Thursday, Feb 28, 13 @ 2:24 pm:

    Sorry — wrong post. Soccermom is caffeine-deprived.


  14. - Dave Fako - Thursday, Feb 28, 13 @ 2:27 pm:

    We all can agree that Bloomberg’s money influenced this election in a significant manner, and, as I suggested yesterday, it helped Kelly more than hurt Halvorson (Halvorson got the % she basically started at). The biggest factor in his money was chasing Toi out of the race and jumping in overt support of Kelly - helping Kelly the most.

    That being said, Kelly was running a very good campaign on her own, and under the same dynamics, without the Bloomberg money, was best positioned to win, albeit it would have been more difficult.

    Now, if the dynamics don’t change as much (multiple credible, or potentially credible, candidates dropping out) as the race progressed, I think we may be having a discussion about how much money Bloomberg wasted on an unsuccessful effort. But that is all hypothetical, conjecture, etc., best debated over a Blatz served on tap at Tom’s Place in Lemont (I like more than Blatz, but in this case, its nostalgic).


  15. - wordslinger - Thursday, Feb 28, 13 @ 2:37 pm:

    –Sorry — wrong post. Soccermom is caffeine-deprived.–

    What the what? It’s the middle of the day — did you just wake up?

    Long trip back from that Vanity Fair Oscar Party?


  16. - Bigtwich - Thursday, Feb 28, 13 @ 2:52 pm:

    I doubt Bloomberg’s money actually changed the outcome. But, with the publicity he got nationally it was good value.


  17. - Responsa - Thursday, Feb 28, 13 @ 2:59 pm:

    Bloomberg is rich and is entitled to spend his fortune any way he chooses, and in whatever avenues that give him pleasure. But to many people, (like me) the way the mayor uses it to influence votes in minor elecions as opposed to using it as the health, vaccination, poverty and education type initiatives of a Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, for instance, is quite sad. I think we all know whose money is going to have the greater long term positive impact on the world and who in the future will be considered in the league with Carnegie as a great philanthropist– and it ain’t going to be nanny Bloomie.


  18. - Just The Way It Is One - Thursday, Feb 28, 13 @ 5:19 pm:

    My thoughts? Can’t get ‘em out ‘cuz after reading the above–$72+ per VOTE?!–I’m speechless…


  19. - Muffin Man - Thursday, Feb 28, 13 @ 6:18 pm:

    If you want to see an interesting comparison—-I wonder what the “cost per vote” was for the Republican winner Paul McKinley? Now— there goes a man who knows how to really stretch a dollar in these tough financial times!Ha-ha.


  20. - Esquire - Thursday, Feb 28, 13 @ 9:13 pm:

    I think that the biggest influence of Bloomberg’s money had was not necessarily related to the votes cast in favor of Kelly — it was more influential in that it drove Hutchinson from the primary race.
    When the field was winnowed, Halvorson’s chances (divide and conquer) evaporated.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Open thread and another LSSI reminder
* In defense of Mary Todd Lincoln on her 200th birthday
* Caption contest!
* Rauner says he'll file end of term report, clear clemency backlog
* Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards
* Pritzker roundup
* Cook County Public Guardian sues DCFS: "Abject moral and human rights failure"
* Mendoza signature clearance rate is high during first round
* Your holiday season moment of Zen
* Pritzker criticized over lack of Active Transportation Alliance members on his transition committee
* Color me skeptical
* Pritzker heading to White House today
* Sen. Schimpf wants Satanic sculpture removed from rotunda as Rep. Bryant introduces condemnation resolution
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller