Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Poll: Downstaters don’t care about Chicago concealed carry
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Poll: Downstaters don’t care about Chicago concealed carry

Monday, Apr 29, 2013

* My weekly syndicated newspaper column

A new statewide poll shows a majority of Illinoisans favor concealed carry. But an overwhelming majority in every area of the state also say it’s OK with them if Chicago and Cook County police have additional authority over who gets to carry in their own jurisdictions.

The Capitol Fax/We Ask America poll of 1,284 likely voters found that 52 percent say they approve of allowing concealed carry.

“Illinois lawmakers are debating proposed laws that would allow some citizens who are properly licensed to carry concealed firearms,” respondents were told. “In general, do you approve or disapprove of allowing licensed citizens to carry loaded, concealed firearms?”

The poll, taken April 24th, found that 46 percent disapprove and just 2 percent were neutral or had no opinion. The poll had a margin of error of +/-2.7 percent. 26 percent of the numbers called were cell phones.

Geography breaks down pretty much how you’d expect. Chicagoans staunchly opposed concealed carry 69-29, while suburban Cook County voters opposed it 52-46. Downstaters strongly support the proposal 67-32 and collar county voters support it 53-46.

Women disapproved of the idea 55-43, while men supported it 64-34. Republicans backed it 72-26, Democrats opposed it 65-34 and independents favored it 61-36. African-Americans opposed the idea 61-36, but whites backed it 56-43, as did Latinos, 56-43.

The results for the poll’s second question were even more interesting.

The Senate is currently considering a plan that would allow Chicago police and the Cook County Sheriff to reject State Police-issued concealed carry permits if they have questions about the applicants’ character. The plan stalled last week when Republican Senators balked after strong National Rifle Association opposition and Chicago-area Democrats demanded more restrictions in the rest of the bill.

But the voting public absolutely loves this idea, with a whopping 73 percent voicing their approval. “I can’t get 73 percent of people to agree that it’s dark at midnight,” joked We Ask America pollster Gregg Durham last week.

“If a concealed carry law is passed, Chicago and Cook County law enforcement officials want the right to stop a permit being issued to any individual in Chicago or Cook County when there is a concern about the applicant’s character,” respondents were told. “Do you think they should be able to stop a permit in Chicago or Cook County under those circumstances?”

A mere 22 percent disagreed with the proposal and only 5 percent were neutral or had no opinion.

The results didn’t surprise Sen. Kwame Raoul (D-Chicago), who is attempting to craft a compromise bill. Raoul said he believed that Downstaters don’t care what happens in Chicago or anywhere else as long as they get their right to carry. And Chicagoans are so concerned about guns that they want their local cops to have an extra say.

According to the poll, a hugely strong 71 percent of likely Downstate voters said they approved of the plan, while 25 percent were opposed. The NRA has threatened legislators with retaliation if Chicagoans don’t end up with the same access to concealed carry as everyone else, but that particular message may not fly as long as Downstaters get what they want for themselves.

Even so, Downstaters seem to be sticking with the NRA. “I am working to pass a Concealed Carry law that specifically says it SHALL apply to all counties in Illinois,” state Sen. Kyle McCarter (R-Lebanon) wrote on his website last week. “The Second Amendment of the Constitution applies [to] all citizens, including those in Chicago.”

But a sky-high 80 percent of likely Chicago voters approved of the proposal, as did 72 percent of suburban Cook voters and 71 percent of collar county voters.

Support was also very high across all demographics. Women were 80-14 in favor, and men were 62-32 in favor. Black voters backed it 75-16, whites supported it 65-34 and Latinos approved of it 75-18. Republicans supported it 64-30, Democrats favored it 82-13 and independents backed it 67-23.

Results like that could make you think this ought to be a no-brainer issue. But the NRA is bringing all of its considerable might to the table here, and that muscle is, so far, outweighing overwhelming public opinion.

Subscribers have crosstabs.

* Related…

* Quinn: Cities, not state, should approve concealed guns: Sen. Tim Bivins of Dixon, the Republican negotiator on the issue, supported Raoul’s idea of a “compromise” giving Chicago more authority if carry permits were more readily available to lawful gun owners in the rest of the state. But he was much more cautious late last week after seeing the proposed language. A more widespread local option is out of the question, the former Lee County sheriff said.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

91 Comments
  1. - wordslinger - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 9:45 am:

    So the NRAs solution to end a c-c ban that Downstaters strongly oppose is to impose on Chicago and Cook a c-c law that they strongly oppose.

    LOL, if only there was an area for compromise….

    The collar numbers and statewide numbers overall are a lot tighter than I expected.


  2. - Anonymous - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 9:46 am:

    Fundamental rights cannot be abridged by a poll.

    If the Kwame Raoul/Tim Bivins compromise is enacted later during this session, I would anticipate another SAF lawsuit and another loss for the Illinois politicians.

    How many millions can the pols spend denying the existence of a constitutional right to gun ownership?


  3. - Anyone Remember? - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 9:49 am:

    Anonymous 9:46

    The proposal is less restrictive than the New York City law, which the Supreme Court refused to hear a challenge to. What makes you think the Chicago / Cook County proposal would fail judicially?


  4. - wordslinger - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 9:50 am:

    –How many millions can the pols spend denying the existence of a constitutional right to gun ownership?–

    Gun ownership isn’t the issue.


  5. - RonOglesby - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 9:51 am:

    @Anyone Remember

    Actually, words mean things… This line:

    —- if they have questions about the applicants’ character. —-

    How would a Chicago cop or Cook Co sheriff know anything about my character?

    And if you read the amendment they were trying to pass off it wasnt simply that Chicago or Cook County could deny a permit to someone for their areas. The entire bill read like a MAY issue bill.

    The devil is in the details. Always.


  6. - walkinfool - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 9:58 am:

    Unlimited gun rights have somehow become a symbol for personal liberty, and are advocated via a constitutional purity that was never supported by the bulk of our founders.

    This is a late 20th Century cultural movement, peaking now.

    Just do the compromise, and be done with the self-righteousness on both sides.


  7. - Boondocks - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 10:02 am:

    The poll makes it sound like Chicago and Cook county Sheriff would have a say only for those that have “character” issues….but those issues are not specifically addressed. Do these poll numbers change if the question more accurately reflects what this bill will do? “May Issue for Cook and Chicago and Shall Issue for the remainder of the State”


  8. - benji - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 10:03 am:

    = So the NRAs solution to end a c-c ban that Downstaters strongly oppose is to impose on Chicago and Cook a c-c law that they strongly oppose. =

    read much?


  9. - Cook County Commoner - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 10:08 am:

    I’ll be interested to see what it takes or more likely how much it costs to pass any “character test” in Chicago and Cook County. Chicago aldermen and selected staff and “friends” will automatically get an “A.” You can count on that. Sounds like an income enhancement program for Chicago and Cook county pols.


  10. - Logic not emotion - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 10:10 am:

    If the question was actually posed as worded below, I’m surprised the result is that low. I believe the original HB0997 provided for input from law enforcement that addresses this issue.

    If the question was worded something to the effect “Should Chicago / Cook County leadership be able to arbitrarily deny individuals who possess clean background checks the ability to defend themselves?” or “Should Chicago / Cook County leadership be able to only provide conceal carry permits to those of their choosing?”, the results would likely be different.

    “If a concealed carry law is passed, Chicago and Cook County law enforcement officials want the right to stop a permit being issued to any individual in Chicago or Cook County when there is a concern about the applicant’s character,” respondents were told. “Do you think they should be able to stop a permit in Chicago or Cook County under those circumstances?”

    For some reason, I’m not seeing the actual poll questions. Can we get a link?


  11. - Rich Miller - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 10:13 am:

    ===For some reason, I’m not seeing the actual poll questions. Can we get a link?===

    Then you’re not reading very well. The complete poll questions are in the column.


  12. - John Jacob Jingleheimer Schmidt - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 10:13 am:

    >>>> Chicago and Cook County law enforcement officials want the right to stop a permit being issued to any individual in Chicago or Cook County when there is a concern about the applicant’s character

    I think the question should have been worded:

    “Chicago and Cook County law enforcement officials want the right to stop a permit being issued to any individual in Chicago or Cook County for any arbitrary reason, in keeping with Chicago’s patronage and racist history.”


  13. - Rich Miller - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 10:14 am:

    JJJS, that’s ludicrous.


  14. - Happy Returns - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 10:14 am:

    ” Just do the compromise, and be done with the self-righteousness on both sides. ”

    or, do the conpromise, tell the true believer’s you did your best, and you need to continue fighting the gun grabbers, but gosh golly, we need more funding!


  15. - wordslinger - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 10:17 am:

    Benji, I read the post. What are you reading?


  16. - benji - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 10:17 am:

    What sacrifice are the grabbers making in their willingness to “compromise”?


  17. - AFSCME Steward - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 10:28 am:

    Benji

    What sacrifices are you willing to mnake for a compromise ??? A compromise requires give and take from both sides.

    “What sacrifice are the grabbers making in their willingness to “compromise”?”


  18. - Mongo - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 10:30 am:

    Is it possible to get 25 posts in without seeing “grabbers” or “gunners” or accusations of bribery or similar comment content that adds nothing to the solution?


  19. - walkinfool - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 10:34 am:

    Benji: good question.

    They are offering a CC bill that is nowhere near as restrictive as some other states already have.

    “grabbers”, as I assume you know, is hyperbole.


  20. - RonOglesby - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 10:37 am:

    @AFSCME Steward

    I will speak for the “pro gun” side for a second, without using some of the argumentative phrases Benji may be using.

    1- we have compromised on training requirements, costs, testing, adding in CPD to the list that can den/object to a permit, no carry locations, Duty to Inform language, etc, etc.

    There have been MANY compromises in the house. many.

    Of course the senate bill was basically the House MAY issue bill. No the language was not identical, but it was just as bad requiring that the application show “Good reason” and document with police reports and restraining orders their need for a gun.

    Sorry, we have compromised a ton and are still willing to. The other side likes to talk compromise but shows little ability to really to do that.


  21. - RonOglesby - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 10:38 am:

    @walkin

    basically just because its not as restrictive as new york but is far away from 38 or 39 other states I wouldnt say that was “in the middle”.


  22. - benji - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 10:44 am:

    What are they giving up, you know, as a compromise? What is the sacrifice?


  23. - Non-ISRA Member - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 10:49 am:

    Only 41 GA shopping days until June 9th.


  24. - Demoralized - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 10:55 am:

    @Anonymous 9:46:

    You better re-read the judges opinion in the concealed carry case. Restrictions are allowed. I’m not sure if what is proposed for Cook County fits into that box but to say that this somehow abridges the “fundamental rights” of gun owners is ridiculous. I get tired of hearing the phrase “fundamental rights” as if any law related to guns is the end of the world. There are no absolutes. There is not one part of the Constitution that does not have limitations. If people would stop being so bull headed maybe something could get done. I doubt it though because the all-or-nothing crowds are dominating the debate. Must be nice to live in a world with such absolutes. Some of you should try coming back to the real world though.


  25. - Fan - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 11:03 am:

    I still find it amazing that some people still think that allowing vetted citizens the right to CHOOSE would be a worse thing than what is already happening in Chicago. Are you afraid crime may actually go down, or go up with all these new shooters?


  26. - titan - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 11:04 am:

    Downstaters don’t really care - in general - no doubt, about CC in Chicago/Cook. One really shouldn’t expect otherwise. But some of them will start to care very quickly once a few get felony charges while inadverently transporting through Chicao/Cook (in a manner perfectly legal everywhere else in the state).


  27. - RSW - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 11:06 am:

    The poll does not capture the nuances of the proposal. How does one deal with people traveling through the county or city. Should these people have to stop at a rest stop to lock up gun? What if inadvertently goes into one of these jurisdictions? Does any portion of 294 go through Cook? Should a mistake be a felony or simple fine? The devil is in the details.


  28. - Chicago Gun Owner - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 11:08 am:

    This poll was worded wrong, the bill proposed was “may issue” in Chicago/Cook. They can deny the permit for any or no reason. What this will mean in practice is that all applications will be denied except for the politically connected. I don’t mind standards and scrutiny, but the standards should be defined and apply equally to all. I hope the General Assembly doesn’t sell out those of us in Chicago/Cook who do support gun rights.


  29. - Amalia - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 11:12 am:

    soundtrack for the poll, current pop tune, ” I love it (I don’t care)”


  30. - Mr. Wonderful - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 11:21 am:

    Bivins dropped off so now it’s simply the Raoul proposal. The proposal would enact an extremely restrictive version of CCW while also enacting the antigunners’ decades-old gun control wish list. There’s not way gun owners may be expected to support any such proposal.


  31. - olddog - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 11:25 am:

    What walkingfool said - This is a late 20th Century cultural movement, peaking now. Unlimited gun rights have somehow become a symbol for personal liberty, and are advocated via a constitutional purity that was never supported by the bulk of our founders. -

    Exactly. Whatever else you can say about it, gun control has turned into a hot-button wedge issue. Longtime congressional correspondent Elizabeth Drew has a recent analysis of how it plays out at the federal level at

    http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2013/apr/26/obama-and-myth-arm-twisting/

    Including this on the defeat of federal gun control legislation: “The polls can indicate a large majority on an issue but that doesn’t mean that this proposition will be uppermost in all those voters’ minds when they next go to the polls—which may not be for at least a couple of years, by which time other issues dominate the headlines. The intensity is quite likely to rest on the side that opposes laws that may interfere with ideologically held views: for the person who worries (irrationally, but no matter) that the government might move to take his guns away this might be the most important issue in the election.”

    Not sure how much that would apply to Illinois legislative primaries, but Drew has an interesting take on the overall political climate.

    She also has a nice little aside on how Sen. Everett McKinley Dirksen was lobbied on the Civil Rights Act of 1964.


  32. - Rich Miller - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 11:26 am:

    ===Bivins dropped off ===

    As of Thursday, he was still willing to negotiate and denied the rumors that he was off the bill.


  33. - RSW - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 11:26 am:

    But I also want a permit system because Colorado only recognises permits issued by person’s state of residence. I lived there a number of years and go back to visit. My Florida and Utah non-resident permits are not accepted there.


  34. - walkinfool - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 11:28 am:

    Benji: I thought I answered your question.

    They are giving up what they actually want, and believe is their constitutional right: to have a more restrictive CC law for public safety — similar to what the courts have allowed in some other states.

    There’s obvious disagreemment on issues of impact and safety. But we cannot wish those away, or just keep arguing about them with no compromise.

    Both sides have already moved positions on this legislation. They just have to finally meet.


  35. - benji - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 11:43 am:

    walkingfool - Our rights aren’t theirs to give up

    wordslinger - Nowhere in the post does it say the NRA wants to impose a Chicago style law on the downstaters. You made that part up based on something you misread or misunderstood.


  36. - Phenomynous - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 11:45 am:

    The question pertaining to Cook/Chicago should be worded to more accurately reflect the situation. This is another reason why polls stink…we expect people to come to a simple response to an incredibly large and dynamic policy decision.

    “Do you think that the Cook County/Chicago government should have authority over who qualifies for conceal/carry in Cook County?”

    That would most likely garner a different percentage.


  37. - walkinfool - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 11:47 am:

    @RonOglesby: Your comments are always well-taken.

    I agree this doesn’t look like the “the middle” given the court finding that we have to have some CC law at all. It does represent compromise from some previous hard line positions.


  38. - RonOglesby - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 12:00 pm:

    @walkinfool

    Too much of this is emotion. There are those in the ILGA (and chicago PD) that believe a laser sight on a handgun makes it much more dangerous… And the mention of it drives them to call it out specifically.

    And on the other side are those that screamed when CPD may be give the right that sheriffs had under HB997 to object to a permit in writing…

    Neither of these sides are thinking clearly and are unable to get past the emotion.

    Should CPD and Cook County have the right to object to a permit (in writing) like any other sheriff in the state? Yes. Why not.

    Should they be able to then turn that question into putting “you require proper cause to get a permit” on the bill… Turning it into May issue?

    No.

    Honestly. I Believe that if much of the Chicago reps would stop the knee jerk and get in a room with Phelps this could get done and they could get much of what they say they want in public (no bars, no stadiums, no schools, longer training, CPD can deny a permit in writing for valid reasons, etc, etc, etc)…

    But I dont see that happening. We could as a State have the Most restrictive shall issue permitting system in the country. That alone sounds like a compromise to me. Is it what either party wants? no. But to be honest Chicago politicians dont even want their people to OWN handguns legally so its a hard starting point.


  39. - Rich Miller - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 12:00 pm:

    ===“Do you think that the Cook County/Chicago government should have authority over who qualifies for conceal/carry in Cook County?” That would most likely garner a different percentage.===

    Highly doubtful.


  40. - AFSCME Steward - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 12:00 pm:

    Ron

    I’m glad to see your reasoned debate rather than some of the hysteria that others are posting. In Cook County, especially Chicago, we have a serious problem with guns. People don’t even feel safe watching TV in their living rooms in some neighborhoods. Some of the problem is federal with persons not eligible to own fireams in Illinois buying them in other states or at gun shows, or through straw purchases. But there is a real fear that allowing everyone to carry in Chicago particularly could create more problems.

    One of the issues I have not seen discusssed is what constitutes a law enforcement ofrficial to inquire about a permit. In Chicago many gangbangers are caught because a citizens reports a person with a gun. Would a cop be allowed to pull over & question every person carrying ? What would constitute probable cause ?

    I understand the concern that some have about politics in Cook County. I am actually more concerned with persons being issued permits to carry solely for political reasons than denials. We have had a history of auxillary Sheriff’s deputies based on connections.

    I think that the problems with violence in Chicago need to be a part of the final bill.

    “I will speak for the “pro gun” side for a second, without using some of the argumentative phrases Benji may be using.

    1- we have compromised on training requirements, costs, testing, adding in CPD to the list that can den/object to a permit, no carry locations, Duty to Inform language, etc, etc.

    There have been MANY compromises in the house. many.

    Of course the senate bill was basically the House MAY issue bill. No the language was not identical, but it was just as bad requiring that the application show “Good reason” and document with police reports and restraining orders their need for a gun.

    Sorry, we have compromised a ton and are still willing to. The other side likes to talk compromise but shows little ability to really to do that.”


  41. - Shore - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 12:04 pm:

    We’ve learned this year again that with guns polls don’t matter because the intensity of the NRA it can match almost everything else.


  42. - Jack - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 12:06 pm:

    Sorry Chicagoans, you’ll only be able to bring a knife to a gun fight. (Flagrant ripoff of the Untouchables).


  43. - Aldyth - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 12:06 pm:

    I’m a downstater. The other day, I was talking to some of my pro-carry neighbors. They really don’t care about what happens in Chicago and Cook County. One of them commented that if he wanted to deal with Chicago problems, he’d go live there.

    We also have a prison in our area that houses a lot of folks from Chicago and Cook County. I asked my neighbors if they want the family member, close friends and associates of the men who are housed there carrying concealed weapons in our town when they come to visit? That question was greeted with a lot of dead silence and exchanges of questioning looks. The response was shaking heads “no”.

    I should mention that people from Chicago are viewed with suspicion out this way, anyway. It took me ten years for my neighbors to decide that I was okay for a Chicago lady.


  44. - Boondocks - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 12:27 pm:

    Rich
    The way the poll was worded, even I would have been in the majority (I’m an obvious ardent cc supporter). If the proposed legislation was worded like the poll question, then I would have no problem with it. But that is not what the senate bill would do…it is MAY issue in Cook and Chicago, not Shall issue with a little extra diligence.
    Would have been a more informative poll if it had accurately stated the senate bill language, IMHO.
    BTW, love the forum here….gives me a chance to view the other side of the discussion, not just drink the Kool-Aid from one side or the other. Thanks


  45. - wordslinger - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 12:28 pm:

    –Nowhere in the post does it say the NRA wants to impose a Chicago style law on the downstaters.–

    Benji, you’re misreading. My point is that a majority of Downstaters want an end to the current prohibition of conceal carry. A majority of Chicagoans do not want it.


  46. - SO IL M - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 12:30 pm:

    First of all, I agree that Residents of Cook County have the same rights as those in the rest of the State, and the Government should not infringe on those rights just because a person lives in Chicago. But, I also dont believe that this State will be able to pass any bill that allows Concealed Carry in Chicago. In my opinion, it is sometimes better to take a partial win and conitnue to fight later for the rest. Pass the original House “Shall Issue” Bill, with the “May Issue” for Cook County, and sorry Cook County, but keep working on your Reps and we will argue that again. This will also let all of them go home and claim a win in their Districts.


  47. - Phenomynous - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 12:30 pm:

    –Highly doubtful.–

    Only one way to find out :) I will be looking forward to the next “We Ask America/Capitol Fax Poll”. And to be fair, the lead to the question should set the context of what “may issue” will look like in Chicago, instead of making it look like the local law enforcement just want to keep bad guys from getting conceal and carry.

    I will gladly contribute to the cost of the poll if I can help with the wording of the questions and context.


  48. - Just Observing - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 12:33 pm:

    As a Chicago resident I really hope our State Reps or Senators don’t sell us out by turning Chicago/Cook into a “may issue” jurisdiction. Chicago residents do not need to fear otherwise law abiding citizens carrying a gun when so many criminals are carrying guns without cc.


  49. - Beatbox - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 12:33 pm:

    This is BS. Look at the question. Basically it says, “should people in Chicago who have questionable character get CC?” Most people will say no. The truth is it would deny CC in cook and chicago. Geez, look, we know you don’t like CC but you don’t have to be so disingenuous about it.


  50. - Rich Miller - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 12:36 pm:

    ===Basically it says===

    No, it doesn’t.


  51. - Ken_in_Aurora - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 12:40 pm:

    “Geez, look, we know you don’t like CC but you don’t have to be so disingenuous about it.”

    Actually, I think you’ll find Rich is pretty neutral on the topic. I’m not crazy about the survey wording either, but I don’t think Rich was pushing an agenda.


  52. - Rich Miller - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 12:50 pm:

    ===I think you’ll find Rich is pretty neutral on the topic===

    I try to be, but I will be applying for a permit if the law passes.


  53. - Logic not emotion - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 12:52 pm:

    @wordslinger: No offense; but you cannot objectively conclude that a majority of Chicagoans do not want concealed carry based upon that poll question. I am a strong supporter of the 2nd amendment and I would agree that law enforcement should prevent people of bad character (as evidenced by arrest records/convictions/known gang associations/etc.) from receiving a permit. That is why HB0997 allows for law enforcement input - in case agencies such as Cook Co SD has objective information that isn’t already in the state database (for some reason).


  54. - wordslinger - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 12:57 pm:

    –No offense; but you cannot objectively conclude that a majority of Chicagoans do not want concealed carry based upon that poll question.–

    It’s hardly the first poll on the subject.

    Perhaps you could point out some polls where a majority of Chicagoans are in favor of conceal carry?


  55. - RonOglesby - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 1:03 pm:

    @ AFSCME

    I understand the problem in Chicago. I grew up there not far from Midway and spend a lot of time in the City still.

    But you assume “EVERYONE” will carry gun. Doubtful. This law would allow for someone willing to do background checks, training, etc to carry a CONCEALED weapon. As far as the “man with a gun” calls.. You pull your weapon only when your life of someone elses is in danger. end of story. Waving the gun around? yes the cops have a right to stop you and you will lose your license.

    as for would the cops be able to stop you and ask for a permit? Yes. If they have reason to. It should be concealed carry. meaning its never out unless you are in danger. (see piece above)

    And as far as everyone carrying.. generally only a few % points of the population go through the process to legally carry. Maybe 3 4 or 5 percent in some states. I would expect no different here.

    BTW


  56. - RonOglesby - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 1:06 pm:

    remember this law wont enable the south or west side banger to get a permit… they carry anyway right now as shown by the shootings in Chicago.

    Think of the insurance adjuster that has to drive into those neighborhoods and cannot be armed for fear of a felony… that is who I picture when I think of laws like this.


  57. - Beatbox - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 1:07 pm:

    If you were neutral, you would have pointed out the glaring problem with the working of the poll and discounted it, instead of using it as “evidence” that downstaters don’t care about Chicago carry.

    Also, if you were neutral, you would point out how the wording in the proposal will practically result in Chicago and Cook being “may issue”


  58. - Rich Miller - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 1:10 pm:

    ===you would point out how the wording in the proposal will practically result in Chicago and Cook being “may issue” ===

    It may, or it may not.

    And as for your insinuations, bite me.


  59. - wordslinger - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 1:13 pm:

    –If you were neutral, you would have pointed out the glaring problem with the working of the poll and discounted it, instead of using it as “evidence” that downstaters don’t care about Chicago carry.–

    Sure. People in Pekin, Marion, Carbondale, etc. are up all night worrying about conceal-carry in Chicago.


  60. - benji - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 1:25 pm:

    = Benji, you’re misreading. =
    No, I’m not. Go look at what you wrote.

    = My point is that a majority of Downstaters want an end to the current prohibition of conceal carry. =
    Definately.

    = A majority of Chicagoans do not want it. =
    Maybe or maybe not. I’m in Chicago and nobody asked me or anyone I know what my opinion was.

    = Perhaps you could point out some polls where a majority of Chicagoans are in favor of conceal carry? =

    There’s been quite a few in the Illinois Carry forums. It’s hardly the first poll on the subject. :)


  61. - Rich Miller - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 1:27 pm:

    ==== My point is that a majority of Downstaters want an end to the current prohibition of conceal carry. =
    Definately.

    = A majority of Chicagoans do not want it. =
    Maybe or maybe not. I’m in Chicago and nobody asked me or anyone I know what my opinion was.===

    If you can’t see the blatant contradiction and willful stupidity in those two statements of yours, then you are hopeless.

    ==== Perhaps you could point out some polls where a majority of Chicagoans are in favor of conceal carry? =

    There’s been quite a few in the Illinois Carry forums. It’s hardly the first poll on the subject. :) ===

    Those aren’t polls, dude. Goodbye.


  62. - Phenomynous - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 1:30 pm:

    I agree that Rich has made a strong effort to show his neutrality on this topic and he has asserted numerous times that he will apply when the law passes.

    Many conceal/carry supporters, as the poll shows, care more about their own ability to obtain the license and not so much whether or not others can. I personally think the wording of the poll questions could be better, and the results would likely change if they were more descriptive of the Raoul proposal. That being said, I don’t know how significant the change would be knowing that most supporters will just be happy to obtain their own license.

    Long story short, many conceal/carry proponents will be happy with any win, especially if it positively impacts them.


  63. - Todd - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 1:32 pm:

    Ah has filed for 30 day extension on cert petition


  64. - wordslinger - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 1:37 pm:

    There’s a lot of picking pepper out of fly stuff here on the wording of the poll questions.

    C’mon man.

    Is it that hard to believe that there’s a division between Chicago and Downstate on conceal-carry?

    Is it that hard to believe that Downstaters who want conceal-carry don’t really care what goes on in Chicago?


  65. - Todd - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 1:37 pm:

    That was suppose to be the AG


  66. - MrJM - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 2:00 pm:

    Pro tip: When you’re arguing methodology with Miller, you’re losing.

    – MrJM


  67. - HenryVK - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 2:00 pm:

    I suspect that if you ask Chicago residents any poll on any issue that starts with “Do you trust Chicago police . . .” you will get less than 40%.

    The reputation for that department when it comes to honesty and overall competence is remarkably low.

    Yet when you ask people to trust CPD to decide who should get a permit to carry a gun, you get high numbers.

    I find that response to this poll odd.


  68. - HenryVK - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 2:04 pm:

    Of course, I still don’t understand why so many in Chicago are so afraid of CC.

    Come on, people. Do you really think the bad guys are not already carrying?

    As somebody noted above, do you seriously think that the insurance adjuster who comes into the city to review a claim and thinks he needs a weapon for protection is going to go on a shooting spree?

    This poll just seems like more evidence that people make judgments on serious policy issues while being disconnected from facts and reality.


  69. - wordslinger - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 2:26 pm:

    –I suspect that if you ask Chicago residents any poll on any issue that starts with “Do you trust Chicago police . . .” you will get less than 40%.The reputation for that department when it comes to honesty and overall competence is remarkably low.–

    BS.

    I bet you don’t hesitate to call them when you’re in a jam, and, when you do, I know they’ll come running with no regard to their safety, like they know they’ll do every day when they punch in.

    I was a cop reporter for 10 years. There are some cowboys and crooks, like in any profession, but the great majority are the salt of the earth, your neighbors, and don’t deserve that kind of grief for the doing the job of the thin blue line.


  70. - late to the party - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 2:29 pm:

    ==remember this law wont enable the south or west side banger to get a permit… they carry anyway right now as shown by the shootings in Chicago.==

    So how would legal conceal carry stop the ’south or west side banger’ from carrying a gun and committing a crime?


  71. - Skeeter - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 2:30 pm:

    Word,

    I happen to agree with you on the merits of CPD.

    But I don’t think that perception is widely held.

    A more common perception is that CPD picks on innocent kids and is incompetent when it comes to stopping crime. I just don’t know many others who trust the department.


  72. - Mr. Wonderful - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 2:32 pm:

    Another thing worth pondering is the impact that JCAR will have on whatever type of bill is eventually passed.


  73. - MrJM - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 2:33 pm:

    “[The response to] this poll just seems like more evidence that people make judgments on serious policy issues while being disconnected from facts and reality.”

    Fixed it!

    – MrJM


  74. - wizard - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 2:49 pm:

    aldyth-10 years, that’s all? LOL in my neck of the woods it may take three generations to accept ANY outsider:) then you are still looked at with suspicion on occasion.
    rick, we often disagree but i never doubt your honesty. will also get a permit, but will probably rarely carry.


  75. - wizard - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 2:50 pm:

    sorry should be rich at 2:49 my apologies rich


  76. - Chicago Gun Owner - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 2:58 pm:

    @wordslinger- I work in those neighborhoods everyone else is afraid to enter. I have had occasion to call 911 for the CPD when I was either a victim of a crime or witnessed one. It’s rare for the police to show up in a timely manner. I’ve waited hours and sometimes they don’t show up at all. Once I reported a burglary in progress, CPD showed up 50 minutes later - 5 minutes after the perps had left. I know several Chicago cops and they’re good people but they are overwhelmed in those neighborhoods. I don’t live in a particularly bad neighborhood but there’s been 1-2 murders per year within 2 blocks of my house in the 9 years I’ve lived here. I don’t vwant cc


  77. - Logic not emotion - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 3:00 pm:

    Henry: “I find that response to this poll odd.” I don’t. Based upon the question wording, I’m surprised it isn’t higher. That said, I thought the wording on the first question was very good.

    Todd: What is the likely real world impact of the AG’s request?


  78. - Fan - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 3:30 pm:

    @ Rich Miller - I know you may like to think you are neutral. On this issue you actually may be. You did state you would apply to carry which is fine with me.

    But, overall I do think you lean left. And as such, you seem to overreact when anyone calls you on anything. To be the Administrator if a Blog with the Street Cred of Capital Fax, I would have thought better of you than “Bite Me” as a recent response.

    I used to enjoy looking up info on Capital Fax. Back in the day, I thought you were more neutral. Not so much any more.

    Go ahead and “Ban me for life”. As a matter of fact, Double Secret, Prohbation Secret” ban me as well. I saw your role as moderator when people got out of line. You jumping into the fray has cost this site Street Cred. Think about it.


  79. - Chicago Gun Owner - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 3:30 pm:

    @wordslinger- I work in those neighborhoods everyone else is afraid to enter. I have had occasion to call 911 for the CPD when I was either a victim of a crime or witnessed one. It’s rare for the police to show up in a timely manner. I’ve waited hours and sometimes they don’t show up at all. Once I reported a burglary in progress, CPD showed up 50 minutes later - 5 minutes after the perps had left. I know several Chicago cops and they’re good people but they are overwhelmed in those neighborhoods. I don’t live in a particularly bad neighborhood but there’s been 1-2 murders per year within 2 blocks of my house in the 9 years I’ve lived here. I don’t want cc to go on a shooting spree, I just want it for defense.


  80. - Rich Miller - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 3:32 pm:

    ===You jumping into the fray has cost this site Street Cred===

    Only among people who live on streets that I would never travel.

    You can bite me, too.


  81. - HenryVK - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 3:35 pm:

    Late to the Party asks:

    “So how would legal conceal carry stop the ’south or west side banger’ from carrying a gun and committing a crime?”

    It won’t.

    And it also won’t mow your lawn. And when your sitting on the couch after a long day, it won’t walk over to the fridge and grab you a beer.

    But it will allow people to carry a gun if they’ve met certain criteria, which is what the cc carry law was denied to do.


  82. - wizard - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 3:50 pm:

    Rich, there is no doubt you lean left. That said, I have not known you to publish untruths and unsupported information. You don’t “suffer fools gladly” to plagarize from a master and out of context. Can’t figure out why someone would be opposed to you posting your own opinion on your blog:)


  83. - downstate commissioner - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 4:07 pm:

    Rich, my opinion is that you lean left, but you attempt to keep the blog neutral. On this gun issue, I believe that you have bent over backward to allow the anti’s their say. In fact, until you said that you would probably get a permit, I actually believed that you actually favored the anti’s somewhat. I think that you are doing a good job with this issue; I don’t agree with the Chicago anti’s, but from this blog, I can understand a little better where they are coming from.


  84. - Ned - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 4:31 pm:

    === I try to be, but I will be applying for a permit if the law passes. ===

    Now *THAT* is truly scary. Now I understand what all the shrieking was about!


  85. - Anyone Remember? - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 5:04 pm:

    Fan

    I don’t think Rich leans left, but I’m reminded of two observations made by Mike Royko. When accosted in public about why “the media is liberal” (after replying “it’s ‘the media are liberal’”), Royko would speak about the Civil Rights Era, where to do something was seen as “liberal” and doing nothing was seen as “conservative.” Can’t find that column online.

    IF that’s too wordy, based upon Rich’s support of Lutheran Social Services, consider this:

    “It’s harder to be a liberal than a conservative, because it’s easier to give someone the finger than a helping hand.”

    http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/mike%20royko

    For all that, still don’t think Rich leans left.


  86. - Rich Miller - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 5:17 pm:

    ===I believe that you have bent over backward to allow the anti’s their say===

    Actually, what I’ve done is allow the ISRA to slit its own throat by reprinting their idiotic press releases. I don’t think you’ve seen all that much from the antis without my own commentary disagreeing with this or that.

    People see what they want to see. Until I noted in comments that I was planning to apply for a ccw permit, many of the hardcore gunners thought for sure I was completely opposed. Not true at all. I just despise their stupid public rhetoric.

    In reality, I’m a pickup truck owner, love country music, was born in Downstate and own a gun. But I respect both sides in this debate (except for the rhetoric), and that drives people on both sides up a freaking wall. Deal with it. It’s your problem, not mine.


  87. - Anonymous - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 5:22 pm:

    @ Anyone Remember 9:49

    “What makes you think the Chicago / Cook County proposal would fail judicially?”

    Sometimes, the SCOTUS will bide its time. If two or more states adopt a position, the court will sometimes choose to act. The New York law may be revisited if Illinois and other states follow the New York approach.


  88. - Rich Miller - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 5:23 pm:

    ===If two or more states adopt a position, the court will sometimes choose to act.===

    That’s already the case.


  89. - Just The Way It Is One - Monday, Apr 29, 13 @ 6:40 pm:

    Fine, informative piece-thanks. Boy, the difference in philosophy on a variety of matters so often intrigues me when you see the breakdown on the stark differences of opinion in this State–even just between Chicago residents and its’ SUBurbs, let alone folks in reference to Downstate!

    And, as such, these Poll numbers really seem to lend credence to the idea that at LEAST Cook County ought to be able to independently grapple with regulating C & C–if anything, because the citizenry there just plain looks at the right–and how to administer it–far differently and more strictly overall–than the rest of Illinois!

    If they don’t separate it out and compromise along these lines somehow, this legislation may otherwise drag on, becoming hopelessly logjammed…!


  90. - steve schnorf - Tuesday, Apr 30, 13 @ 12:30 am:

    Rich frequently leans, particularly after about 3 or 4 pm


  91. - Anyone Remember? - Tuesday, Apr 30, 13 @ 9:20 am:

    Anonymous 5:22

    New York City concealed carry restrictions were originally enacted in 1911, and has withstood all legal challenges in the intervening 102 years … .


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Rauner vetoes anti-Crosscheck bill
* *** UPDATED x1 *** SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Campaign stuff
* Rauner says he's "extremely troubled" by Trump's "defense of the Russians"
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Our sorry state
* Question of the day
* Grade inflation
* C'mon, November...
* Because... Madigan!
* Rauner: "I will never sign a bill that violates the Second Amendment"
* Rate Rauner's new ad: "Just Call Madigan"
* Pritzker reports spending almost three times as much as Rauner
* Your feel-good Illinois story of the day: Nichols Paint and Fab
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Loading


* Rauner signs Quincy Veterans' Home bills..
* Rauner: President should blame Russians for hac.....
* Rauner vetoes anti-Crosscheck bill..
* Rauner signs laws to speed up Quincy vets' .....
* Governor in Effingham to Sign Term Limits Pledge..
* Pritzker spent nearly $11 million on advertisin.....
* Rauner vetoes bill that would have changed poli.....
* Pritzker Burning Through Money Almost 3 Times A.....
* Rauner vetoes bill that would have altered Metr.....
* Rauner says he's “extremely troubled” by Tr.....


* Rauner: President should blame Russians for hacking
* Rauner signs laws to speed up Quincy vets’ home construction
* States: Workaround succeeding after cut in health subsidies
* UI settles lawsuit against alumnus for $7.5K
* State lawmakers accused of harassment are running for office
* Benedictine hopes to sell Springfield campus for $3M
* 4-year-old boy found dead after central Illinois house fire
* Excerpts from recent editorials in newspapers in Illinois
* Peoria pulls plug on contentious riverfront apartments plan
* Judge: Trial in Laquan McDonald shooting to start Sept. 5

* Rauner: President Trump should blame Russians for hacking
* Rauner signs laws to speed up Quincy veterans' home construction
* U of I paying alum $7,500 to halt sales of Chief Illiniwek T-shirt
* Rauner's campaign spent nearly $8 million last quarter. Pritzker's spent more than double that.
* Gov. Rauner signs two gun control bills, says he'll veto another
* Rauner signs bill to ease physician assistant hiring
* Londrigan outraises Davis in 2nd quarter; Davis has more in fund
* Rauner doesn't want Illinois pulled from multistate voter registration system
* Gov. Rauner signs two gun control bills
* Londrigan outraises Davis in 3rd quarter; Davis has more in fund

* Can a 3-D printer solve Chicago's affordable housing problem?
* Boeing sees budget-airline surge driving $15 trillion market
* Abbott's next-generation device to treat leaky heart valves gets FDA OK
* CIBC shutters third-largest Illinois branch following buyout of PrivateBancorp
* These health officials see marijuana as an alternative to opioids


* Arizona Cardinals GM Steve Keim pleads guilty to extreme DUI
* Mid-summer in Chicago fishing: To the Midwest Fishing Report
* Manny Machado trade rumors grabbing attention at All-Star Game
* Immigrant children describe hunger and cold in detention
* FOP trustee complains cop commander ‘out of uniform’ at Harith Augustus shooting
* ‘He’s a trip’: Inside look at why the Bears have a special coach in Vic Fangio
* City exceeding $250 maximum penalty against thousands of motorists, lawsuit says
* Manny Machado feels ‘blessed’ by trade talk
* Even with cap space, help might not be on the way for the Blackhawks
* Heart condition led to CFD diver Juan Bucio’s death: autopsy


* Emanuel tops $10M for re-election bid, five times the total raised by his 10 challengers
* 'War and Peace' and my pal Putin: A new TrumPoem, based on the president's words
* Firefighter Juan Bucio's death ruled accident, caused by asphyxia and rare heart condition
* Cubs' Yu Darvish wants a 6-foot fence around his new lakefront mansion. Evanston says not so fast.
* In unusual move, judge silences media lawyer in Chicago cop's high-profile murder case
* Charles Weigel, former Elmhurst mayor, dies
* Lake Zurich Boy Scouts praised after helping crash victims during South Dakota hiking trip
* Trump is on Putin's side, not America's
* New dockless bike-sharing program could debut in Oak Park in 2019, officials say
* Girl rescued from Crystal Lake swim beach, flown to hospital after being found unresponsive


» Vallas Returns Campaign Cash From Controversial Donor Tied To CPS Scandal
» Biometric Data Lawsuit Reaches IL Supreme Court; Electronic Monitoring Devices; HPV Vaccines
» Illinois Governor Bruce Rauner Signs Two Bills Aimed at Reducing Gun Violence
» July 16, 2018 - Full Show
» CHA Seniors File Complaint Over Missing Grab Bars
» Cook County Commissioners Confounded By Hiring Of Health System Consultant
» Third Party Candidates for Governor; Student Loans & Retirement Saving; New Illinois Made Makers
» CPD Officer Shoots And Kills Man In South Shore
» Durbin Says He Hasn't Taken Position on SCOTUS Pick — Also Has Doubts About Election Security
» Look Inside The Renovated Governor's Mansion


* Rauner: President Trump should blame Russians for hacking
* Rauner signs laws to speed up Quincy veterans' home construction
* U of I paying alum $7,500 to halt sales of Chief Illiniwek T-shirt
* Rauner's campaign spent nearly $8 million last quarter. Pritzker's spent more than double that.
* EJ Dionne: Will the blue wave start in Jersey?
* Their View: 'Everybody needed to know what happened to Emmett Till'
* Gov. Rauner signs two gun control bills, says he'll veto another
* Rauner signs bill to ease physician assistant hiring
* Londrigan outraises Davis in 2nd quarter; Davis has more in fund
* Rauner doesn't want Illinois pulled from multistate voter registration system


* Five at 5: Shooting victim testifies at attempted murder trial and 4 other stories to see
* Granite City man who was charged with murder is caught
* Folk singer Ray LaMontagne is coming to Davenport this fall
* UI athletics gets $1 million donation
* Video: Rock Island Co. Courthouse deadly tree incident
* Community mourns death of white businessman who stayed in East St. Louis after many left
* Several rural Southern Illinois fire departments get equipment grants from Fire Marshal
* Boil order lifted in Murphysboro
* Carbondale Walmart remodels, donates $20K to Honor Flight
* Feeling sick? A contagious stomach virus is spreading across Illinois, doctors warn.


* The Pyramid House in Wadsworth is on fire
* Plainfield man gets 12 life sentences for sexually abusing two children
* Wheaton man who assaulted woman could be free by year's end
* Costs lower than expected for new St. Charles police station
* Gabe Rivera, Texas Tech star left paralyzed, dies at 57

* Brevities for July 17, 2018
* Local Congress members react to Trump-Puti...
* Joy, Tampico getting more than $5M in wate...
* Gillibrand in Chicago boosting Pritzker, U...
* Republicans, including Davis, raise big bu...
* Reps. Mark Walker & Rodney Davis
*
Metro East Republicans in Congress raise b...
* Londrigan outraises Davis in 2nd quarter; ...
* Londrigan Claims Momentum After Outraising...
* Letter to the Editor | Nomination is all a...

* Senators considering what their options ar......
* The question that could end Brett Kavanaug......
* Duckworth, Durbin announce over $1 million......
* Illinois Lawmakers Slam Trump's Helsin......
* Illinois communities to receive million do......

* Democratic socialism can succeed in the Mi......
* Congressional candidate seeks another boos......
* This Chicago Startup Makes It Easy To Mail......
* Tammy Duckworth brings baby to work......
* Duckworth, Durbin announce over $1 million......

* Emmett Till.
* What’s in your wallet?
* The Week In Chicago Rock
* The [Tuesday] Papers
* CBS Chicago: Protests Continue Over Police-Involved Shooting
* When High School Officials Suppress Students' Free Speech
* The Ex-Cub Factor
* Surprise FCC Move Maims Sinclair-Tribune Merger
* The [Thursday] Papers
* Rauner’s I.C.E. investments and Rahm’s polling numbers. Lightfoot positioned to force a run-off.


* Illinois Department of Human Rights Releases Important New Guidebook for Housing Providers
* Illinois State Fire Marshal announces $2.2 million in grants for fire safety
* Gov. Rauner vetoes SB 2368
* Governor takes bill action
* Gov. Rauner signs Quincy Veterans' Home bills

  
* Twitter says it doesn’t ‘have the bandwidth’ to fix verification right now
* The next generation of VR headsets will connect over a single USB-C cable
* Nest CEO steps down as division is brought under the Google Home team
* Fans pay homage to Drake by hurling themselves from moving cars
* White Oppo Find X leaks ahead of possible unveiling
* The US government has trouble keeping track of radioactive material
* Undercover Facebook moderator was instructed not to remove fringe groups or hate speech

* White Sox Rumors: Where Manny Machado will most likely land
* Slugger Isaias Tejeda rejoins York Revolution, but team loses relie...
* Revolution pitcher Devan Watts has is contract purchased by the Chi...
* Craig Kimbrel's long beard: Boston Red Sox closer has no plans ...
* MLB local ratings flat from last year through first half, Milwaukee...
* White Sox MiLB Report: Winston-Salem Wins With Walk-Off Gran...
* White Sox's Avisail Garcia: Could be activated Friday


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller