Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Rauner blasted for saying he’d veto gay marriage bill
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Rauner blasted for saying he’d veto gay marriage bill

Monday, Jun 2, 2014

* Conservative Republican gay rights group GOProud’s endorsement of Bruce Rauner on the eve of the official start of legal gay marriage here sparked a major backlash among gay rights organizations which pushed the bill. From a press release

A robust debate occurred last year over whether all Illinois couples and families should be treated equally and with dignity under the law. Today, as we celebrate the official commencement of the Religious Freedom and Marriage Fairness Act, we honor those officials who stood for freedom and equality.

We also remember those public figures, like Bruce Rauner, who chose the side of bigotry and intolerance.

Rauner, the Republican candidate for governor, claims to be a social moderate. In public and in the media, he claims not to “have a social agenda” and that “it doesn’t matter” how he feels about marriage equality.

Rauner can’t have it both ways. A real leader takes a stand. But we now know how he really feels. Last year at a Tea Party gathering in Quincy, he had this to say about marriage equality: “They haven’t approved it in a referendum, so if I were governor I would veto.”

Rauner opposes the freedom to marry. If he had been Governor, the many couples across Illinois who today are celebrating new families would still be relegated to a second-class legal status. Bruce Rauner, as he said in Quincy, has no problem with that.

We know the real Bruce Rauner. His administration would very likely be working behind-the-scenes to block new legislation and erode the existing laws protecting our families.

Just look at the GOP “top of the ticket” and the elected officials Rauner surrounds himself with, like running mate Evelyn Sanguinetti and U.S. Senate candidate Jim Oberweis, both of who strongly oppose the freedom to marry, LGBT family adoption rights and other legal protections. Moreover, he has given tens of thousands of dollars to anti-LGBT candidates throughout our state.

* Sun-Times

“They haven’t approved it in a referendum, so if I were governor I would veto,” [Equality Illinois] alleges Rauner said.

Rauner’s campaign could not verify the account or provide a response to the letter because they could not immediately be reached for comment Sunday evening.

Earlier Sunday, campaign spokesman Mike Schrimpf declined to reveal Rauner’s personal feelings on same-sex marriage because “Bruce does not have an agenda on social issues.” But he said Rauner is not in favor of overturning the new law unless a referendum on the ballot calls for it. The campaign also noted Rauner was endorsed by GOProud, a Republican pro-gay rights group.

And Schrimpf added that Rauner does wish the best for newly-married same-sex couples.

“He wishes them congratulations and many years of happiness together,” Schrimpf said.

* That’s no mere allegation. It’s a fact. I posted the audio of Rauner’s tea party event comments on December 19th

* From the Quinn campaign…

Throughout the campaign, Rauner has sought to downplay his position on the wrong side of history, telling one reporter: “My view is irrelevant. Why does that matter?”

At other times, he has ducked the issue altogether, acting as if it weren’t important. According to one report, during a press availability in Peoria, when a reporter asked, “Should Illinois legalize gay marriage?” Rauner responded: “I guess we’re done,” and abruptly walked out of the room.

While Rauner sought to downplay the significance of his position on the matter, people across Illinois visited their county clerks’ offices to apply for marriage licenses, a right they would undeniably not have had if Bruce Rauner were governor.

Thoughts?

- Posted by Rich Miller        

35 Comments
  1. - wordslinger - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 9:09 am:

    He said he’d veto it. That’s unambiguous. Own it.


  2. - MrJM (@MisterJayEm) - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 9:13 am:

    “Buh… buh… but Rauner’s second wife is a Democrat!!1!”

    – MrJM


  3. - Linus - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 9:14 am:

    This “I don’t have a social agenda” shtick is going to look increasingly evasive and cowardly — not stoic and statesmanlike, as the campaign apparently hopes. Governors have to deal with social issues, plain and simple. Same goes for gubernatorial candidates. It’s a core element of the job description.


  4. - Jimmy CrackCorn - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 9:20 am:

    I saw this push in sponsored posts all over social media this weekend. Sure, the effectiveness of social media campaigns is questionable… But, it was nice to see some new (old) outside groups jump in to the governor’s race.


  5. - Judgment Day - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 9:23 am:

    Advice to Equality Illinois:

    Stop being a sore winner. It’s unbecoming of what you have accomplished.


  6. - Oswego Willy - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 9:26 am:

    Prime example of the “Two Rauners”

    You can not live your life one way, create a persona that refutes your actual life, and then, when it’s by convenience, of another 180 to try have both sides of one issue.

    I am continually amazed at Conservative “Platform”, litmus test Republicans who gravitate to “Bruce Rauner” and fail to see the real Bruce Rauner they are supporting.

    I am continually amazed at groups, led by Terry Cosgrove or Equality Illinois and supporters of both, that understand that “Bruce Rauner” and Bruce Rauner are not the same, and how important those “Moderate” groups dismiss and even refute both Rauners, and to their credit, make sure the education of voters to both Rauners continues, and trying to make sure Illinois voters are not fooled like the GOP voters this March.

    You say something, you own it. Gotta eat it. It is who you are, not to who was listening that day, even that hour. The GOP know that, Democrats know that, Raunerites do not care.

    Remember GOP GA members, Bruce Rauner thinks 1/3 of you are corrupt…too… to the corrupt Democrats, even Bruce Rauner’s PAC might support…against you.

    Being a Raunerite means saying anything, meaning nothing, repeating talking points, until you watch the shiny object Raunerites think will fool you best.

    I hope the Terry Cosgroves and Equality Illinois groups understand how important education on Rauner is, and the Unions, hope they aren’t fooled too.


  7. - Frenchie Mendoza - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 9:26 am:

    How can anyone elect — or even contemplating electing — a governor that claims he or she has no social agenda? A social agenda is part of governing.

    Of course he has a social agenda. Of course he does. To say that you don’t is to say you’ve essentially unplugged your moral consciousness for your entire life. Rauner hasn’t. He’s unplugged it (perhaps) when it’s come to take-no-prisoners profiteering — but to say or to suggest you have no social agenda is like admitting the absence of your soul. And then being proud that you’re (secular or spiritual — doesn’t matter) not burdened with it or not bothered by its absence.


  8. - Joe Bidenopolous - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 9:28 am:

    He can’t claim to be a leader and then hide behind referenda. It’s a continuing contradiction he puts forth, like when he’s a hands-on leader in the businesses GCTR owned except when they were bad and he wasn’t. Word is absolutely right - he needs to own it, own something, own anything.


  9. - Jeeves the Cat - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 9:31 am:

    Dodge. Weave. Don’t take a position. Don’t answer any questions directly. Use personal fortune to flood TV’s across state with friendly faces of other people telling everyone else in Illinois how great Bruce is. Win in November. Start showing people who you really are in 2015. Pray they don’t remember by 2018.


  10. - Wensicia - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 9:33 am:

    Cowardice. Remember, what’s happening right now would not have been possible if Rauner were governor. Reflect on other issues he won’t offer an opinion on and think of what he’ll say and do if elected.


  11. - wndycty - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 9:36 am:

    @Judgment Day I don’t see how Equality Illinois is being a “sore winner.” This is an election year and they are merely protecting their allies, as most organizations with a policy agenda do. There is nothing sore about this, its just reminding those who value marriage equality who their friends are, and in the case of Rauner, who they aren’t.


  12. - Frenchie Mendoza - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 9:37 am:

    BTW — why doesn’t he simply say, “I’ll tell you my social agenda once I’m elected.”

    That’s essentially what he’s saying — and, like many have said above, it’s time to own up. If you want to keep running the dopey, jokey commercials on Bravo and Lifetime — fine. The puppy dogs and flowers will certainly entice some folks. But for the folks that want Rauner to intellectually enagage — even if his engagement doesn’t lead to immediate or even viable solutions — he ought to simply say, “I’ll reveal all when I’m elected.”

    Or: “My social agenda aligns with my GOP base. You connect the dots.” This would lose his puppy dog and flower democrats, but it might gain him some hardcore GOP votes that would otherwise stay home.

    What about gun control? He’ll bob and weave here, too — simply because Glocks and puppy dogs and flower voters don’t usually care for one another.


  13. - A guy... - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 9:50 am:

    To be on the wrong side of history, you need some history. That story will unfold over time. It’s the law of the land going forward. People in favor have achieved a very important milestone for their cause. It’s a big enough issue that a referendum wouldn’t have been a terrible idea. Even today, I’m not certain it would have achieved a majority in a referendum. California did not.

    That being said, Greg Harris (with some powerful help) did a masterful job with this. Mostly by being gracious, gentlemanly and non-threatening. This is still a difficult issue for many people. Spiking the football might be the wrong approach. Just celebrate your love and your new rights and let’s get back to business. There’s a lot more to do.


  14. - Bored Chairman - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 9:52 am:

    Um, wasn’t Obama opposed to SSM until recently?


  15. - Cheryl44 - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 9:53 am:

    As far as I can tell, being against equality and wanting to lower the minimum wage are the only opinions Rauner’s offered about anything.


  16. - Walker - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 9:56 am:

    “We have an economic and fiscal emergency. We need to focus all our attention there. That’s why I won’t be talking about social issues.”

    This framing just might work with the voting public. Especially if the general driver is dissatisfaction.

    But it sure won’t drive turnout. That’s what a social issues agenda does — as both sides have proven.


  17. - Oswego Willy - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 10:13 am:

    This is not spiking the football, not having class, or grace, or whatever Dopey spin Raunerbots want this spun as.

    Reality?

    One of the Bruce Rauners said they would veto SSM. Proponents of the measure, wether they were victorious or not, need to understand that Bruce Rauner, and “Slip and Sue” were not in favor of SSM, and no matter what national group of Dopes want to give cover to “Slip and Sue” or the Rauners, one of the Rauners would have vetoed SSM.

    They the Rauners/”Slip and Sue” ticket are not for SSM, so own that and move on. Just don’t change your story Rauner Crew, as you court Democrats and Indies, hoping they ignore or forget all you said to refute your new “reality”.


  18. - Joan P. - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 10:23 am:

    “Bruce does not have an agenda on social issues.”

    Really? Because, as governor, he doesn’t expect to have to deal with “social issues”? What world does he live in?


  19. - Langhorne - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 10:44 am:

    Social issues will come up. If the baron has no social agenda, how will he deal w them? Benefits for pregnant women for ex. Cost/benefit analysis? Ask his panel of superstars? Referenda? Online polling? Give them to the lt gov?

    No social agenda, except for a veto of gay marriage


  20. - MrJM (@MisterJayEm) - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 10:59 am:

    Stop being a sore winner. It’s unbecoming of what you have accomplished.

    Fighting on when others tell you to rest on your laurels is exactly how you become a winner.

    – MrJM


  21. - maxwellsmarts - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 11:10 am:

    I guess he said what he felt he needed to say to Tea Partiers. If he feels differently, he should say so.

    There’s a reason the only Republican elected to the Executive Branch supports marriage equality. It’s not a “social agenda,” the freedom to marry for all truly matters to Illinoisans.


  22. - maxwellsmarts - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 11:13 am:

    Er, besides the outgoing Treasurer of course. And his feelings on the matter are… complicated, let’s say.


  23. - Upon Further Review - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 11:31 am:

    @Maxwellsmarts:

    Your 11:10 comment is less than honest. SSM passed in the House with one vote more than the minimum to spare.

    It is a form of classic Progressive conceit that you assume that all people share such opinions. If the freedom to marry for all truly matters to Illinoisans why did it take 196 years to revise the law?

    As another comment noted above a referendum on marriage failed in California, so it is a fair bet that a similar referendum would not have been approved in Illinois. The SSM strategists knew that and opposed having the question put to the voting public.

    Celebrate your legislative victory, but do not imagine that there is or was universal support for SSM in the Prairie State. This issue is more complicated then that.


  24. - Anon - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 11:33 am:

    As with presenting his own budget, taking a stand on social issues will only lose him votes. Consequently, he doesn’t take a stand, and hopes voters won’t pay attention to that SSM comment he made before the primary. Since the law is in effect, I don’t see that issue being significant in November.


  25. - Cheswick - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 11:34 am:

    “We shouldn’t be sidetracked by social issues when we have serious economic and financial problems in this state. That’s why I don’t understand why no one is paying attention to my proposed budget.” — Bruce Rauner

    Oh. Wait.


  26. - Amuzing Myself - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 11:39 am:

    In a lesson still not learned by IL Republicans, it doesn’t matter how moderate you might be, the left will find a way to turn you into a drooling, right-wing nut in a hotly contested election. It’s old, tiresome and should be pretty insulting to educated voters. However, it has proven time and again to be effective in politics, and in Illinois, the politics trumps everything else. This will get some media play and some targeted mail attention, but it’s not going to turn the election. Most (not all of course, but most) who care enough to base their vote entirely on this issue were never likely voting R anyway. Smoke and mirrors. If the discussion can be about this rather than the budget, taxes and the miserable failure that is Gov. Quinn, then Quinn doesn’t lose that particular day. Yawn…


  27. - wordslinger - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 11:42 am:

    – If the discussion can be about this rather than the budget, taxes …–

    You’re right. Let’s discuss the Rauner ideas on the budget and taxes.


  28. - Upon Further Review - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 11:51 am:

    Nationally, the polling data looks bad for the Democrats. In Illinois, the Democrats are in a position of strength, so the legislature ought to be secure, but the leaders are taking nothing for granted and refusing to yield an inch. An exceptional amount of gimmickry is being employed to motivate their voters to show up in November. This controversy seems to be more of the same. The possibility of a Governor Rauner rescinding SSM seems to be slim or none, but creating a nonsensical controversy will bring out some voters and open some checkbooks.


  29. - Joe Bidenopolous - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 12:07 pm:

    Upon further review said: “If the freedom to marry for all truly matters to Illinoisans why did it take 196 years to revise the law?”

    I don’t know other than to say it shouldn’t have taken that long. Why did it take until the 1860s to abolish slavery? Why did it take until the 1920s to allow women the right to vote? Why did it take until the 1960s to have enforcable civil rights and eliminate prohibitions on interracial marriage?

    Maybe because there are people in society - in control of segments of society - whose power within society diminishes when those things happened. Could be.


  30. - Oswego Willy - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 12:15 pm:

    ===In a lesson still not learned by IL Republicans, it doesn’t matter how moderate you might be, the left will find a way to turn you into a drooling, right-wing nut in a hotly contested election. ====

    Bruce Rauner, one of them anyway, said he would veto SSM. It came out if his mouth.

    To that,

    Pick your issue. If you are a one issue voter, the good or bad of that, knowing someone’s stance is not a left wing conspiracy, nor is it a right wing slam.

    You are for something, you are against something, that’s that.

    The reason Rauner’s Crew is avoiding anything that might peel off votes is that standing for nothing polls better than leadership and standing for something. A lesson that Crew learned “shaking up Unions” and not controlling turnout.

    Own it, eat it. Rauner would have vetoed SSM. He said it, so he needs to just accept that saying that, negates him as a choice to some voters.


  31. - maxwellsmarts - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 1:02 pm:

    @Upon Further Review:

    If you are basing Illinoisan attitude based on vote count alone, you would be sorely mistaking the temperature of the populace. Heading INTO the vote, there was already a plurality of Illinois polls supporting marriage equality:

    http://paulsimoninstitute.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=619%3A021413-poll-shows-growing-support-for-gay-marriage-in-illinois&Itemid=210

    http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20130219/BLOGS02/130219779/illinoisans-back-gay-marriage-50-29-crains-ipsos-poll


  32. - Precinct Captain - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 2:47 pm:

    ==Stop being a sore winner. It’s unbecoming of what you have accomplished.==

    I guess the NAACP should have just packed up shop after Brown.

    ==It’s a big enough issue that a referendum wouldn’t have been a terrible idea. Even today, I’m not certain it would have achieved a majority in a referendum.==

    You don’t put human rights up the vote of a referendum. That’s cowardice.

    ==If the freedom to marry for all truly matters to Illinoisans why did it take 196 years to revise the law?==

    Do you truly believe that your statement is an example of logical thinking?

    ==it doesn’t matter how moderate you might be==

    You can’t be moderate when you’re a reactionary. The definitions do not go together. Look them up in the dictionary.


  33. - A guy... - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 5:10 pm:

    Precinct Captain, there are plenty of people who would disagree with this being a Civil Rights issue. I’d be one of them. Given your obvious view otherwise (which I can respect as a position), the process that took place wasn’t exactly high brow to say the least. SSM is now a legal status in Illinois (and other states). Social acceptance in many quarters will take some time or be unattainable for some. If a referendum showed popular support among a majority, that would certainly speed things up a bit. Passing a law is no more or less cowardice than gauging public opinion. It’s legal. Keep living and keep convincing people there ‘never’ was anything to be afraid of. That’s how you win the crowd. Not the nutty stuff.

    I would not be in favor of repealing this law. I wouldn’t do anything to gin up support to do so. Just gracefully accept a win.


  34. - MyTwoCents - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 5:38 pm:

    It sounds like Rauner is doubling down on his position. According to the Tribune Rauner believes in letting voters decide issues.

    http://my.chicagotribune.com/#section/-1/article/p2p-80377711/

    It seems like Rauner may regret his spokesman saying that, unless he’s saying he’ll sign a minimum wage increase or millionaires tax if he wins and those 2 referenda pass in November. Then again this whole episode is typical of the Rauner campaign, say (or not say) whatever it takes to offend the least amount of people, try to make everybody happy and do whatever it takes to win without thinking about what happens if he wins. People say he’s not a politician but he’s certainly acting like one.


  35. - Oswego Willy - Monday, Jun 2, 14 @ 5:54 pm:

    Both Rauners will try to sell that they wanted a referendum, then would veto the legislation, thus keeping both promises!

    The more Equality Illinois or other groups point out the utter fraud that both Rauners are, and that trusting either Rauner is a fatal blow to their issues…if the Real Rauner thinks is politically expediant, then call it “baloney ” and laugh at the voters and the reporters questioning him.

    Rauner already laughs at us. Rauner already laughs at questions. Rauner already laughs at reporters.

    It won’t change. It will only get worse.

    Both Rauners are the type of candidates that love the idea of fooling as many people as possible, and mocking those wanting something “different” while being part of the status quo.

    Pathetic.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Illinois Policy Institute news service scores exclusive Rauner interview
* Dispute erupts over how many people can attend a meeting
* ILGOP unleashes robocalls in wake of Senate tax hike vote
* It's just a bill
* Question of the day
* It's not 4.95 percent, it's 5.81 percent for the rest of this year
* Far more heat than light
* Caption contest!
* *** UPDATED x1 *** "Eyes are back on to the Senate"?
* *** UPDATED x2 *** Mendoza warns of "breaking point"
* Can an oligarch be a progressive?
* *** UPDATED x2 - Kennedy responds - Pawar responds *** Pritzker, Biss respond to Senate budget votes
* In her dreams
* Support High-Performing Charter Schools
* "I’m a big believer in win-win"
* Unkind headlines
* Modernize the Vital Records Act - Support HB 1785
* *** LIVE *** Session coverage
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Loading


* Day after Senate budget vote, GOP tries to push.....
* Day after Senate budget vote, GOP tries to push.....
* Day after Senate budget vote, GOP tries to push.....
* Feeling bold? Then Illinois bonds may be for you..
* State memo: Tax bill may not survive constituti.....
* Bernard Schoenburg: Senate Democrats take actio.....
* STATE AFFAIRS: Readers balance Illinois budget..
* Illinois Senate OKs bill allowing AT&T to drop .....
* Deadline Approaching: One on One With Gov. Bruc.....


* Fastest growing US cities are in South; 4 of top 5 in Texas
* Chicago train service to install new camera system
* Chicago schools to borrow about $900 million
* Senate bills seek tougher Great Lakes pipeline standards
* Legislative hearing takes up Illinois child welfare agency
* Former pizzeria operator guilty of drug charges
* Grand jury indicts man in fatal shooting of judge
* Special prosecutor to review Porter County deputy's case
* Grand jury indicts man in fatal shooting of judge
* Teen dies after younger brother accidently shoots him

* Trump budget draws different Illinois reviews
* Bernard Schoenburg: Senate Democrats take action; situation still tense
* Illinois House begins review of Senate Democrats' budget plan
* Senate OKs bill allowing AT&T to shift resources from older technology
* Lawmakers hear about high caseloads, pressure at DCFS
* House Democrats propose college grant program
* Senate Dems approve $5.4B tax increase; budget fight continues
* Budget showdown: Senate Dems approve $5.4B tax increase
* Budget showdown: Senate Dems approve $5B tax increase
* Red-light cameras rake in millions for Chicago suburbs

* Massive Union Station project gets a developer
* United CEO: Dragging incident needs 'to be constant reminder'
* A new South Loop high school? CPS will look at it.
* Feeling bold? Then Illinois bonds may be for you
* Illinois budget spotlight shifts to Madigan


* Chicago commuter train service to install new camera system
* Man wounded in Little Village shooting
* Man shot after argument in Lawndale
* 14-year-old boy shot in Austin
* Police: 16-year-old found boy shot to death in South Shore
* Kyle Hendricks sharp again, beats Giants as Cub rotation shapes up
* Georgia Nicols horoscopes for May 25, 2017
* Dear Abby: Friend talks about religion, nothing else
* Foreign meetings omitted from Sessions’ security clearance
* Reporter alleges Montana GOP hopeful Greg Gianforte body-slammed him


* All aboard: Joliet Rocket steamin' into town
* Cheap out: Five fun things to do for free
* Quigley says Russia probe is 'in its infancy'
* Chicago in epicenter of charter school teacher contract disputes
* Montana GOP candidate cited for assault after reporter says he was slammed to the ground
* Anthony Rizzo's two homers pave way for balanced Cubs attack
* Chicago only major U.S. city to lose population from 2015 to 2016
* Cubs, Giants feel short-changed by calls
* Navy Pier sues Teamsters over protest tactics
* Willson Contreras' education as catcher took off before he reached majors


» Illinois Issues: Should 10-Year-Old Kids Be Kept In Juvenile Detention?
» Chicago Public Schools Look To Borrow $900 Million
» United CEO To Investors: We'll Be More Focused On Customers
» Red-Light Cameras Rake In Millions For Chicago Suburbs
» Judge Delays Decision On How Quickly State Should Pay Medicaid
» How Would Trump’s Budget Affect Illinois?
» Illinois Democrats Pass Budget Proposal in Senate
» Illinois Senate Approves Tax Hike, $37B Budget Plan
» Chicago Teachers Give Schools Chief No Confidence Vote
» Palatine Transgender Student To Graduate, But Locker Room Debate Continues


* Sounding the Alarm: Unacceptable
* Trump budget draws different Illinois reviews
* Bernard Schoenburg: Senate Democrats take action; situation still tense
* Our View: Cohesion needs to be central part of YWCA block decisions
* Illinois House begins review of Senate Democrats' budget plan
* Our View: Cohesion needs to be central part of Y block decisions
* Senate OKs bill allowing AT&T to shift resources from older technology
* Lawmakers hear about high caseloads, pressure at DCFS
* Sounding the Alarm: Unacceptable
* Sounding the Alarm: Time to take action


* Vera Fowler
* Joe Marlo
* Ora Essex
* Georgianna Richey
* Marsha Green
* Yolanda Esquer
* William Hertter
* Irene Marshall
* Christopher Coniglio
* Rita Poole


* Bahrain, Egypt block Al-Jazeera websites amid Qatar dispute
* Girls soccer scoreboard: Wednesday, May 24, results
* Softball scoreboard: Wednesday, May 24, results
* Baseball scoreboard: Wednesday, May 24, results
* Boys volleyball scoreboard: Wednesday, May 24, results

* PHOTOS: Protesters stage die-in at Randy H...
* US Rep. Randy Hultgren's office the scene ...
* Second Democrat announces bid to unseat Hu...
* Sweet: Hultgren, Roskam, Kinzinger avoid b...
* Local Republicans, Democrats praise appoin...
* Batavia resident announces candidacy for 1...
* Comey's firing, health care fuel voters' a...
* Teacher raised in Yorkville running agains...
* Protesters continue die-in at US Rep. Rand...
* Jim Walz Will Challenge Randy Hultgren for...

* Congressional Budget Office: House bill to......
* Local legislators blast Trump plan - Quad-......

* Congressional Budget Office: House bill to......
* Local legislators blast Trump plan - Quad-......

* “The Driver’s Side” – News From The Motorist’s Perspective
* Is government too political?
* Queer and proud in a cool protester outfit
* Jon Mueller and Mike Weis meditate with drums at the Zen Buddhist Temple-Chicago
* Hitting Left with the Klonsky Brothers #16. Globalization.
* Losers!
* A zombie rides Pegasus into the sun on the gig poster of the week
* Black Cinema House honors the art of the shoeshine
* State Capitol Report: Senate’s unanimous vote for PACE bond bill and more
* Three more local ROTYs to recognize at June 6 ROTY banquet


* Illinois Awarded Funds to Offer Advanced Training on Detecting Impaired Driving
* Illinois EPA Announces Upcoming Household Hazardous Waste Collection Events
* IEMA Highlights Emergency Preparedness for People with Access and Functional Needs in May - Ready Illinois website offers preparedness tips for people, caregivers
* First Lady Launches Illinois Family Connects
* Governor and Lt. Governor Unveil 2016 Journal of Local Government Shared Service Best Practices

  
* Samsung Pay in Hong Kong transitions into full service
* Samsung Gear 360 goes on sale on Thursday, May 25th
* Addressing touch latency on the OnePlus 5, company also says it has Snapdragon 835
* T-Mobile bumps up deprioritization limit to 32GB
* OnePlus confirms Snapdragon 835 for OnePlus 5
* Verizon SmartHub is a cellular smart home router
* Twitter for Apple TV Gains Support for Live 360 Degree Video and Periscope Global Map

* Quintana: Location culprit for big-inning woes
* Abreu, Leury homers not enough in finale
* Sox welcome Detroit for doubleheader
* Abreu, Leury homers not enough in finale
* Shields pleased with arm after 'pen session
* Quintana looks to avoid another no-decision
* Renteria uses NL maneuvers to guide club


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller