Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » We’re one step closer
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
We’re one step closer

Thursday, May 21, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller

* The Senate just voted 37-19 to pass HB 218

(T)he possession of 15 grams or less of cannabis is a civil law violation punishable by a minimum fine of $55 and a maximum fine of $125;

The bill will be held in the chamber until a House “trailer bill” is eventually passed by the Senate.

…Adding… Press release…

The Illinois Senate approved a bill 37-19 Thursday to remove criminal penalties for possession of a small amount of marijuana. The measure, which was approved by the House of Representatives in April, will now be sent to Gov. Bruce Rauner (R) for his signature.

HB 218, introduced in the Senate by Sen. Michael Noland (D-Elgin) and in the House by Rep. Kelly Cassidy (D-Chicago), makes possession of up to 15 grams of marijuana a civil law violation punishable by a $125 fine. Individuals will no longer face time in jail, and the civil offense will be automatically expunged in order to prevent a permanent criminal record.

“Serious criminal penalties should be reserved for individuals who commit serious crimes,” Rep. Cassidy said. “The possibility of jail time should not even be on the table when it comes to simple marijuana possession. Criminalizing people for marijuana possession is not a good use of our state’s limited law enforcement resources.”

Under current Illinois law, possession of up to 2.5 grams of marijuana is a class C misdemeanor punishable by up to 30 days in jail and/or a fine of up to $1,500; possession of 2.5-10 grams is a class B misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in jail and/or a fine of up to $1,500; and possession of 10-30 grams is a class 4 felony punishable by up to one year in jail and/or a $1,500 fine. More than 100 localities in Illinois have adopted measures that reduce penalties for simple marijuana possession.

“We hope Gov. Rauner will sign this important and broadly supported legislation,” said Chris Lindsey, a legislative analyst for the Marijuana Policy Project. “This is a sensible alternative to Illinois’s needlessly complicated and draconian marijuana possession laws. It’s time to stop destroying people’s lives over possession of a substance that is undeniably less harmful than alcohol.”

Illinois marijuana laws disproportionately impact communities of color, according to reports released by the Institute for Metropolitan Affairs at Roosevelt University in May 2014 and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) in June 2013. African Americans in Illinois are 7.6 times more likely to be cited or arrested for marijuana possession than whites, despite using marijuana at a similar rate, according to the ACLU.

“This legislation is long overdue in Illinois,” said Rev. Alexander Sharp, executive director of Clergy for a New Drug Policy. “Simple marijuana possession does not warrant harsh criminal penalties that can turn someone’s life upside down. Laws should protect people, not cause more harm to them than the activity they’re intended to prevent.”

Nineteen states and the District of Columbia have removed the threat of jail time for simple marijuana possession.

       

44 Comments
  1. - Homer J. Quinn - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 1:54 pm:

    what does the trailer bill do or say?

    one step closer but what are the odds that it’ll be two steps back when it gets to rauner’s desk?


  2. - Mad Brown - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 1:54 pm:

    I’m going to find a big bag of Doritos and watch an episode of Mystery Science Theater 3000 to celebrate.


  3. - Team Sleep - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 1:55 pm:

    I really appreciated Senator Barickman’s remarks and vote and I even appreciated Senator Oberweis’s remarks and demand for further action.


  4. - The Colossus of Roads - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 2:01 pm:

    Seems like a very small fine to me. Legalizing possession for a small amount makes sense, but what is the penalty for trying to buy 15 grams?


  5. - Just an Old Guy - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 2:02 pm:

    One toke over the line sweet Jesus!


  6. - Jake From Elwood - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 2:08 pm:

    My mind played reggae music when I read this post. Of course this should be a minor offense tantamount to possession of alcohol.


  7. - Grandson of Man - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 2:19 pm:

    I’ve been watching this bill daily. I’m very glad it passed and hope that the governor will sign it. We do baby steps in Illinois, but we’re movin’ in the right direction.


  8. - That Funky Monkey - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 2:20 pm:

    Did Illinois get any fix on charging folks as impaired drivers for traces of marijuana in their blood even though there’s no evidence that they were actually impaired at the time of the accident?


  9. - Archiesmom - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 2:26 pm:

    I’m going with Mad Brown.


  10. - Precinct Captain - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 2:29 pm:

    Good.


  11. - Homer J. Quinn - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 2:32 pm:

    that funky monkey, HB218 established a standard for DUI with blood/saliva testing:

    “Provides that a person shall not drive or be in actual physical control of any vehicle within this State when the person has, within 2 hours thereof, a tetrahydrocannabinol concentration in the person’s whole blood or other bodily substance of 15 nanograms or more of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol per milliliter of whole blood or 25 nanograms or more of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol per milliliter of other bodily substance from the unlawful consumption of cannabis (rather than a concentration in any amount).”


  12. - Anonymouse - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 2:33 pm:

    Not until you pass my turnaround agenda


  13. - Arizona Bob - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 2:34 pm:

    Been a long time comin’. I remember back in my college years in the 1970s when a small amount could get you in the slammer for five years and ruin your life. Too bad it took so long. How many lives has this kind of prohibition ruined?


  14. - Not quite a majority - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 2:41 pm:

    I can’t think of a more appropriate bill to pass given the current Session.


  15. - A guy - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 2:42 pm:

    Cool man.


  16. - Rich Miller - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 2:51 pm:

    Way to go, AB!

    See? I knew we’d agree on something eventually.

    lol


  17. - Team Sleep - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 2:51 pm:

    I am curious to see how counties impose the sliding fine schedule. For example, will smaller, more conservative counties - many of whom are hurting for cash - keep the fine schedule at or near $125? I would be that to be the case, and I would bet larger counties will try to keep their fines on the lower end of the scale. Just a guess.


  18. - A guy - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 3:19 pm:

    ==Rich Miller - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 2:51 pm:

    Way to go, AB!

    See? I knew we’d agree on something eventually.

    lol===

    Perhaps the two of you can celebrate this in a special way. I’ll send you some White Castles w/cheese for afterwards. lol


  19. - Rich Miller - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 3:20 pm:

    ===Perhaps the two of you can celebrate this in a special way===

    Not until Bruce signs it.

    lol


  20. - D.P.Gumby - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 3:25 pm:

    And how long before legalization??


  21. - downstate commissioner - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 3:29 pm:

    Hard to believe-that fine is lower than a speeding ticket, which I believe now starts at $125. Will be interesting to see what Rauner does….


  22. - A guy - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 3:31 pm:

    No expiration on the “Sliders with Brakes” offer sir.


  23. - phocion - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 3:34 pm:

    Good.


  24. - Amalia - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 3:34 pm:

    here’s what is frustrating….quality of product. I’m happy that it is being decriminalized, as it should be. but legalizing it would be so much easier and better and….bakery products! I don’t have the fondest memories of the brownies I produced. any hints?


  25. - Homer J. Quinn - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 3:44 pm:

    Amalia: try googling “badkittysmiles recipes.”


  26. - Federalist - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 3:57 pm:

    What does 15 grams amount to? How many ‘cigarettes’ would that make?


  27. - Homer J. Quinn - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 4:02 pm:

    it’s just over half an ounce; how many servings that is depends on the individual.


  28. - Ken_in_Aurora - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 4:18 pm:

    15 grams wouldn’t have been much use back in glory days of “5 finger bags”, but from what I can tell the market for individual users now is all quarter and half ounce quantities. I think this is an excellent idea so long as we don’t tolerate impaired driving.

    I’ve reached the age where I have to keep brain cells alive, so no direct effect here…


  29. - Dudeman - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 4:37 pm:

    Thus begins the decline of Western Civilization part 3. Wack Wack Wack! That’s my skull! I’m so wasted! - Spicoli


  30. - Just Observing - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 4:43 pm:

    === What does 15 grams amount to? How many ‘cigarettes’ would that make? ===

    A lot.


  31. - Just Observing - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 4:44 pm:

    Kudos to the legislators that voted for this; shame on those that didn’t. Rauner: please sign!


  32. - Wordslinger - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 5:09 pm:

    A good step, if signed.

    There’s a bipartisan push to get weed off of Schedule I at the federal level as well to facilitate the growing legal commerce (paying attention, GA — commerce, like making money?).

    Also, a bipartisan band of federal lawmakers finally got Obama’s attention to push the loony reefer-madness DEA chief out the door.

    Hopefully, the un-American “civil forfeiture” terror for weed will end as well.


  33. - Anon - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 5:30 pm:

    I was going to post…but then I got high.


  34. - PoolGuy - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 5:34 pm:

    for the non-smokers, 15 grams is just over 1/2 ounce, 28 grams to an ounce. if i was to guess I would equate 15 grams to having maybe 3-4 cases of beer in your fridge and you drank regularly on weekends. maybe 8-10 bottles of wine, or 2-3 bottles of bourbon. that would compare in a general sense to someone who smokes regularly on weekends.

    now for someone who smokes pretty much daily, maybe only 1-2 cases of beer, or 3-4 bottles of wine.


  35. - PoolGuy - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 5:36 pm:

    and regular beer, not light beer lol :)


  36. - Amalia - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 6:09 pm:

    Thanks HJQuinn!


  37. - Confused - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 6:29 pm:

    It’s hard to imagine a piece of legislation that will affect my life less than this one.


  38. - Homer J. Quinn - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 6:53 pm:

    Confused: did you have a lot riding on whether sweet corn should be our state vegetable?


  39. - Ugly Rumours - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 7:29 pm:

    From an avid user, hallelujah! On to legalization and taxation; trust me folks it’s less harmful than alcohol.


  40. - Anonymous - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 7:39 pm:

    Driving about .05 BAC below the.08 BAC impairment?where’s the traffic mayhem in Colorado?


  41. - FormerParatrooper - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 8:11 pm:

    Eventually marijuana will be legalized everywhere. Just a matter of time. Interesting when you read about different drugs being made illegal, how much racism was involved in the decisions.

    This is my two cents: The war on drugs has resulted in giving government more power, entrapping parts of our society in perpetual poverty and making the well connected richer. Legalize, tax and treat like alcohol and cigarettes. The problems of addiction will not go away, and may even grow at first before the novelty wears off, so add tax to facilitate treatment for the ill effects.


  42. - Homer J. Quinn - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 8:55 pm:

    i doubt there will be problems with cannabis addiction. it’s less addictive than coffee, at about 9% of users becoming dependent. withdrawal, if any, is a day or two of irritability. this isn’t a drug that ruins lives; it’s not alcohol.

    post-legalization it’ll be like this: if cannabis improves your life in some way, you’ll use it. if it doesn’t you won’t, and nobody will care either way. i don’t know why there has to be so much hand-wringing to get to that point.


  43. - Slick Willy - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 9:21 pm:

    If only it was HB 420….


  44. - Arizona Bob - Thursday, May 21, 15 @ 10:38 pm:

    Does this mean that “Hash Wednesday” will be returning to the U of I quad next year?LOL


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today's edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller