Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Yard signs don’t vote, but they’re here to stay
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Yard signs don’t vote, but they’re here to stay

Wednesday, Aug 3, 2016 - Posted by Rich Miller

* From the Washington Post

No one loves lawn signs more than political candidates. Political candidates love lawn signs because 1. They love seeing their name around, 2. They assume that the number of lawn signs they see somehow correlates to the level of support they enjoy and 3. They know that campaigns have lawn signs, and candidates are biased toward mimicking what winning candidates have done. Between 1984 and 2012, according to one study, use of lawn signs in campaigns quadrupled.

The problem with lawn signs, as any campaign manager would probably tell you, is that they are expensive, annoying, logistically tricky to distribute and — most importantly — don’t seem to do much of anything. Candidates like to feel as if they’re winning. Campaign managers like to know that they’re winning or at least making progress. So campaign managers like things that have either measurable effects on voters (like identifying targeted supporters) or demonstrated past effects (like advertising). Lawn signs don’t fit into either category. To a campaign manager, lawn signs are similar to randomly handing out fliers at a grocery store: a waste of time, money and energy.

Meh. Campaigns often find out who their strongest supporters are when voters agree to put up a yard sign after being contacted either door-to-door or by phone. Campaigns can then circle back and ask the supporters to get even more involved, either by volunteering or by contributing or both. The sign placements also provide physical evidence that precinct workers and phone-bankers are doing their jobs.

* The WaPo story is actually about a new study on yard signs

Cutting to the chase: “[I]t appears that signs typically have a modest effect on advertising candidates’ vote shares — an effect that is probably greater than zero but unlikely to be large enough to alter the outcome of a contest that would otherwise be decided by more than a few percentage points.” The effect of such signs, the study suggests, is about the same as direct mail.

Of the researchers’ four experiments, only one involved what you might generally think of as yard signs. In three of the experiments, signs were placed in public places within randomly assigned precincts. In the fourth, signs were placed in supporters’ yards — the thing that campaigns often spend a lot of time coordinating. In that case, interestingly, the effects were essentially zero. Aggregated, the four experiments suggested that there was a 1.7 percentage-point boost to the candidate from the signs — with a standard error of 0.7 percentage points. (In precincts adjacent to the targeted ones, there was a slightly smaller benefit.)

If the impact is “about the same as direct mail,” then don’t expect campaigns to stop putting up yard signs any time soon. Campaigns send out tons and tons of direct mail. Not to mention that they all use robocalls, even though it’s getting more difficult to reach voters that way in the height of campaign season because so few people will answer their phones due to the stupefyingly overwhelming crush of the automated calls.

* One other item of note

The silver lining is that the study suggests that the much-easier distribution of lawn signs in random public places is more effective than finding supporters and plunking signs in their yards.

Except, that’s illegal.

       

31 Comments
  1. - Rufus - Wednesday, Aug 3, 16 @ 10:32 am:

    The covenant in our sub-division does not allow political yard signs - thank god!


  2. - Because I said so.... - Wednesday, Aug 3, 16 @ 10:37 am:

    I recently ordered a Clinton/Kaine lawn sign. $30 with shipping, using a promo code for a discount. Ah, for the good old days when they were free.


  3. - Give Me A Break - Wednesday, Aug 3, 16 @ 10:39 am:

    Reminds me of when a friend from Kansas came to SPI for a visit that took place in October of an election.

    He told me when they first came into town he thought everyone in Springfield has their home on the market due to the number of signs in front yards.

    But this is Springfield where GOP state and county workers express their love for their jobs via yard signs.


  4. - Mason born - Wednesday, Aug 3, 16 @ 10:43 am:

    Normally I despise yard signs. This year they’re actually handy see someone who has a Trump sign assume mental deficiency.


  5. - Give Me A Break - Wednesday, Aug 3, 16 @ 10:44 am:

    Because: Not sure if you got taken for a ride or what, but the day a candidate charges me for a sign is the day that candidate’s sign does not go up in my yard.


  6. - Because I said so.... - Wednesday, Aug 3, 16 @ 10:46 am:

    @Give Me A Break, I viewed it as a small financial contribution to the campaign that I support.


  7. - Mason born - Wednesday, Aug 3, 16 @ 10:53 am:

    Grew up in the country. Worst thing for us was when the signs seemed to pop up overnight along fields, pastures and in the yard. Dad Loathed it. Either mowed them over with the Bush hog or used them 4 target stands.


  8. - The Way I See It - Wednesday, Aug 3, 16 @ 10:56 am:

    No one loves yard signs more than candidates … except the people who print them


  9. - Tommydanger - Wednesday, Aug 3, 16 @ 10:59 am:

    I voted against Jim Ryan for the sole reason that every election day I would wake up to find his signs sprouting overnight along public road right of ways. I figured if he wasn’t willing to follow the law, I could hardly expect him to enforce the law.

    We never placed signs on public property. Never.


  10. - Shemp - Wednesday, Aug 3, 16 @ 11:09 am:

    I have noticed a certain party has put up signs in the right-of-way of park district property, right across from a polling station for several years here. Always surprised they had the nerve to do it, let alone repeatedly. Annoys me to no end to see signs in public r.o.w.’s.


  11. - Mama - Wednesday, Aug 3, 16 @ 11:10 am:

    Yard signs do put the candidates name out there. I think the signs are good for the unknown candidates.


  12. - a modest proposal - Wednesday, Aug 3, 16 @ 11:12 am:

    —Except, that’s illegal.—

    I may be splitting hairs here, but thats not necessarily true. While it is true that you cannot put yard signs on government property, you can strategically put yard signs on private property, which is adjacent to public spaces.


  13. - JoanP - Wednesday, Aug 3, 16 @ 11:18 am:

    What really irks me is when signs stay up for months after the election is over. I think all candidates should be required to remove their signs within a reasonable period of time (a week, maybe) or be fined.


  14. - LessAnon? - Wednesday, Aug 3, 16 @ 11:18 am:

    Some signs (the larger ones) can show a candidates strength both in organization and in support. Different counties and townships have different traditions when it comes to signs. In some places, people expect tons of signs everywhere - including r.o.w. - and if you don’t, you look weak. Some places abhor them, and you have to be careful how you get them out.

    Subdivisions that don’t allow them are only able to do that with the consent of everyone that lives there. That practice was found unconstitutional in the 90s down in the St. Louis area (Ladue?), but who wants to be “that guy” to their neighbors?

    Signs are a pain in the neck, somewhat expensive and just a part of campaigns now. Hard to imagine a respectable campaign - even one spending millions on tv ads - that didn’t have signs available to supporters to display in their yards.


  15. - Anon2U - Wednesday, Aug 3, 16 @ 11:21 am:

    Candidate with the most Illegal yard signs loses my vote. In the 11th CD race Kouri puts them where ever she pleases, parks, medians, vacant commercial property. That was just for the primary. Can’t imagine what the general will look like. Ugh.


  16. - Belle - Wednesday, Aug 3, 16 @ 11:34 am:

    I’ve planted them in our yard for Aldermanic elections, but only in highly contested situations where I felt it would get me a couple of points if my guy won.

    I wanted to do it last year during a local run-off. We were out of town for awhile and the people watering our plants were supporting the other candidate (in the run-off) and their help meant more to me than the election.


  17. - Century Club - Wednesday, Aug 3, 16 @ 11:35 am:

    Yard signs are about the same as direct mail?! I can’t imagine a candidate for State Rep/Sen, City Council, or local office being viable without mail in a contested race.

    Also, I don’t think campaign managers should be thinking about whether yard signs work overall, they should be thinking about whether yard signs work for their particular race.


  18. - A guy - Wednesday, Aug 3, 16 @ 11:37 am:

    ===Except, that’s illegal.===

    The enforcement is nearly non-existent. As a precinct captain I can say that the campaigns that strew signs in public access routes are generally the ones that are losing, or at the very least lazy. I’m not certain how many people are influenced by those; but a tuned-in neighbor who pays attention with a sign in their yard? That does have some influence.


  19. - walker - Wednesday, Aug 3, 16 @ 11:39 am:

    For a newcomer, with low name awareness, they can help increase it.


  20. - Illinois bob - Wednesday, Aug 3, 16 @ 11:39 am:

    Cost for posting a Hillary sign…$30.

    Cost for NOT posting a Hillary sign…$150!

    It’s the Chicaguh way!

    Precinct Captain, isn’t that what you tell your Dem patronage workers?LOL


  21. - illinois Bob - Wednesday, Aug 3, 16 @ 11:51 am:

    When I lived in Chicago’s 19 ward (Beverly and Mt Greenwood) we had an old joke regarding yard signs. The Precinct captain would come to your door and ask, “Do you want to put up our candidates’ yard signs, or are you tired of having your garbage picked up?”LOL


  22. - anon2 - Wednesday, Aug 3, 16 @ 11:52 am:

    It’s certainly encouraging to a candidate when a sea of his or her signs sprout up. It’s also discouraging to the opposition. The number of sign locations on lawns is also a good way to measure effectie precinct work.


  23. - Because I said so.... - Wednesday, Aug 3, 16 @ 11:56 am:

    @Illinois Bob, no one asked me to purchase a Hillary sign. I do live in Chicago and feel strongly about this election. It was my choice.


  24. - lech W - Wednesday, Aug 3, 16 @ 11:58 am:

    it is not illegal on election day !

    (10 ILCS 5/7-41)
    The area on polling place property beyond the campaign free zone, whether publicly or privately owned, is a public forum for the time that the polls are open on an election day….The regulation of electioneering on polling place property on an election day, including but not limited to the placement of temporary signs, is an exclusive power and function of the State.


  25. - @MisterJayEm - Wednesday, Aug 3, 16 @ 11:58 am:

    “Campaigns often find out who their strongest supporters are when voters agree to put up a yard sign after being contacted either door-to-door or by phone. Campaigns can then circle back and ask the supporters to get even more involved, either by volunteering or by contributing or both.”

    Sadly, most campaigns could cut their yard sign budgets by 70% and still accomplish these worthy goals.

    – MrJM


  26. - Anonish - Wednesday, Aug 3, 16 @ 12:40 pm:

    Yard signs aren’t as much an indicator of willingness to help as many might think. It is the least possible effort action for many people and it is them “doing their part” to help the campaign. They suck up money and time for the campaign.


  27. - Orzo - Wednesday, Aug 3, 16 @ 12:42 pm:

    There may be reasons to put up yard signs, but making a difference in the election is not one of the reasons. Demoralizing the opponent that had the nerve to run against your candidate might make you feel good, but it is certainly not a great use of resources.


  28. - Sir Reel - Wednesday, Aug 3, 16 @ 1:15 pm:

    Like several commenter so, I don’t like seeing signs on public property or on private property, without permission.

    ROW’s are tricky. In some cases, they are public property. In others, they’re private property that has a road easement so a sign may be legal, if the property owner agrees.

    I consider them visual clutter.


  29. - Just Chilling - Wednesday, Aug 3, 16 @ 2:41 pm:

    Another perspective here — I hold nonpartisan office in a smaller city. Yard signs are one of the best ways to call attention to such contests and get your name in front of the public. Newspapers are losing circulation, radio costs too much. So you hope you have or can find friends with strategically located yards. Never put them on public property and always take them down promptly.


  30. - Boone's is Back - Wednesday, Aug 3, 16 @ 3:05 pm:

    The best part is when candidates go nuts and start tearing down their opponent’s yard signs!


  31. - Groucho - Friday, Aug 19, 16 @ 1:27 pm:

    I truly believe that when a person agrees to a yard sign, while they may simply be doing their precinct capt a favor, the sign will help reinforce their commitment to vote for that candidate. Neighbors are also influenced by the sign as it creates name recognition and/or validates a candidate. I think is most true in the lower profile races.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the holiday weekend
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Update to today’s edition (Updated)
* Uber’s Local Partnership = Stress-Free Travel For Paratransit Riders
* IEA releases member poll, with eye on major pension upgrade
* Finally, a CTU fiscal proposal that doesn't involve magic beans
* Go read the rest
* As lawsuits and strike threats fly, Pritzker calls on Stellantis to live up to its commitments on Belvidere plant
* Today's quotable: George McCaskey
* Buried nugget and magic beans
* Open thread
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition and some campaign stuff
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller