Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Illinois African-American Republican teen blamed for huge national poll skew
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Illinois African-American Republican teen blamed for huge national poll skew

Wednesday, Oct 12, 2016 - Posted by Rich Miller

* If you’re following national polling average sites like RCP, you know that the Los Angeles Times/USC poll has shown Donald Trump leading Hillary Clinton when pretty much all other polls have shown Clinton ahead. Well it turns out that a single polling “panelist,” who is a 19 year-old Illinois African-American has been skewing the results (of a highly questionable methodology) because he is supporting Trump

In some polls, he’s weighted as much as 30 times more than the average respondent, and as much as 300 times more than the least-weighted respondent.

Alone, he has been enough to put Mr. Trump in double digits of support among black voters. He can improve Mr. Trump’s margin by 1 point in the survey, even though he is one of around 3,000 panelists.

He is also the reason Mrs. Clinton took the lead in the U.S.C./LAT poll for the first time in a month on Wednesday. The poll includes only the last seven days of respondents, and he hasn’t taken the poll since Oct. 4. Mrs. Clinton surged once he was out of the sample for the first time in several weeks.

How has he made such a difference? And why has the poll been such an outlier? It’s because the U.S.C./LAT poll made a number of unusual decisions in designing and weighting its survey.

There’s a lot more to this, so go read the whole thing.

       

23 Comments
  1. - AlfondoGonz - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 2:54 pm:

    Not sure how race is relevant here, other than because we seem to have found the one black Trump supporter.


  2. - Ron - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 2:59 pm:

    It matters because polls weight for demographics, the problem with this “poll” is that it took a random sample of 3000 people and tracks them throughout the election. It’s not really a poll at all but a tracking of a very specific group of voters. It’s flawed for anything other than trends.


  3. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 3:00 pm:

    ===Not sure how race is relevant here===

    You really are completely weird. Read the freaking story. It’s completely relevant. It’s the whole story.


  4. - Amalia - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 3:15 pm:

    oh, 19 year old men……


  5. - Responsa - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 3:15 pm:

    I already posted my “polling” rant on another thread here today and it still applies–in spades– so I won’t repeat it.


  6. - AlfondoGonz - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 3:16 pm:

    Point taken. *Sheepishly acknowledges I did not read whole story*

    I do, however, take “weird” as a compliment.


  7. - Ron - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 3:22 pm:

    Clinton is up by 5-10% in virtually every other recent poll. That’s like 7 vs. this 1 garbage outlier.


  8. - train111 - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 3:23 pm:

    A few weeks back there was a story about a polling company that took its raw survey data and handed it off to 4 other polling companies. Lo and behold you had 5 different results all the way from Hillary +5 to Trump +1. All these companies apply their “secret sauce” to the raw numbers to approximate the make up of the entire electorate. This LA Times one is certainly different than all the others - especially with their transperancy about how they “massage” the raw numbers.


  9. - Ron - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 3:24 pm:

    Trump will hand the Democrats the Senate and the House. The Republican party is a joke.


  10. - DuPage Saint - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 3:24 pm:

    I bet the young man is from Oswego


  11. - Ron - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 3:26 pm:

    Lol@DuPage Saint!


  12. - Not quite a majority - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 3:33 pm:

    Note to self: ignore LA Times polls FOR EV ER.


  13. - Federalist - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 3:41 pm:

    Talk about bad polling! Wow!

    Makes you wonder about other polls as well as if I already didn’t.


  14. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 3:41 pm:

    Too funny. Moral of the story: when reading polls, don’t ignore the footnotes.


  15. - Responsa - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 3:51 pm:

    ==Too funny.==

    I’m glad you think it’s funny. The people allegedly overseeing and authenticating this poll should lose their jobs for this.


  16. - Ron - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 3:55 pm:

    http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/?ex_cid=rrpromo


  17. - Tommy - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 3:59 pm:

    Interesting stuff. The folks running the survey obviously know they’ve been stuck with outlier results for a few weeks, why not change their methodology on the fly??? Is mantaining the same survey group in a daily tracking poll so sacrosanct that they can’t change weighting or drop a participant in midstream? Fako, you out there?


  18. - Someone you should know - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 4:01 pm:

    What do you expect from a TRONC Product?


  19. - Lol @ IL - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 4:03 pm:

    “Trump will hand the Democrats the Senate and the House. The Republican party is a joke.” Senate maybe, house, absolutely not. Too many states are too gerrymandered.


  20. - muon - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 4:34 pm:

    As train111 mentioned, we only know this because this poll is completely transparent. They provide raw data and demographic assumptions. That let Upshot first duplicate the poll results, then recalculate them without the overweighted point. They should be commended for that level of transparency. I wish all polls were as open about their internal weighting.


  21. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 5:26 pm:

    That LA Times/USC poll has been beyond trippy outlier.

    You’d think an honest newsman like Ferro would have gotten a handle on that.


  22. - weltschmerz - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 6:50 pm:

    When Ike was told that half of the American people were of below average intelligence, he was appalled.


  23. - sal-says - Thursday, Oct 13, 16 @ 3:36 pm:

    Wonder why sal-says is not a poll junkie? A lot of polls are junk.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Federal appeals court stays Downstate federal judge's gun ruling (Updated)
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* Illinois Supreme Court: Raw cannabis smell is enough to trigger warrantless automobile searches
* Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards
* Carp-e Diem!
* Roundup: Jurors see Madigan’s list of recommended hires for Pritzker administration
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller