Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Madigan’s state central committee opponent explains his bid
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Madigan’s state central committee opponent explains his bid

Wednesday, Dec 6, 2017

* Some of you have noticed that House Speaker Michael Madigan has an opponent in his reelection for state party central committee. If Madigan somehow loses that race, he can’t be state party chairman. Mateusz ‘Mat’ Tomkowiak had originally decided to run for Congress as a Democrat. From this past June..

While no Republican contender has yet come forward, Democratic U.S. Rep. Daniel Lipinski, of Illinois’ 3rd District, continues to gain challengers from his own party.

The latest candidate to announce his intention to run is Mateusz “Mat” Tomkowiak, an academic with an eye toward health policy, who wants to be the first openly LGBT federal elected official in Illinois’ history. He will be joining Lipinski and marketing consultant Marie Newman, who announced her candidacy in April, in the March 2018 primary.

Being the first federal LGBT elected official from Illinois would be a significant step for the LGBT community, Tomkowiak told Windy City Times. He believes LGBT members of Congress are important in demonstrating that LGBT people are “capable of representing constituents in the same way that non-LGBT people are.”

Tomkowiak hasn’t reported raising any federal money and he doesn’t yet have a state committee. He does have a website, however.

* I asked Tomkowiak about his race and he sent me this…

The thing that I believe in more than anything is single payer health care. I have fought for that most of my adult life (ever since my brother’s and mother’s mental illnesses tore apart their lives). I thought I could change the health system from a university (so I got a PHD at Princeton), or by advising politicians (so I got involved in writing the ACA); but, those avenues didn’t work. So, I tried to run for Congress in the place I grew up (the place where my family first stepped on American soil when we came here from Poland). Sure, I am half the age of the two other people in the race, but, at least on paper, I thought that my resume of progressive accomplishments was longer than both of my opponents’ records combined. Nonetheless, I realized that I don’t have the money to buy the Democratic primary for Congress in the 3rd. Both Lipinski and Newman (two rich folks, from the two wealthiest cities in the district, Western Springs and La Grange) spend more money in a month, then my parents or I made in a year.

Name and wealth are destiny in American politics. The rich rule while the poor spectate, fooled into thinking that their cheering has an impact on the outcome of the game. While I was pursuing my PhD at Princeton, I was part of study that demonstrated empirical evidence for this conclusion. For instance, when the rich and the poor disagree in public opinion polling, the rich almost always win in public policy, whether the Democrats or Republicans are in power (we called America an “oligarchy”). Still, I wanted to experience this on my own skin. Maybe the data were wrong.

The data were NOT wrong. And what I have seen over the last few months has only further convinced me that the Democratic party is not the vehicle for the changes I want to see in the world. For instance, I have watched as a wealthy businesswoman who worked as a PR consultant for the health insurance industry, working to deny health care to the poor, has bought herself the label of “progressive.” This is America in a nutshell. The wealthy and the well-connected can make catastrophically bad decisions, yet elude accountability.
All of this is to say that I have decided to run as an independent against whoever buys the Democratic primary for Congress, and for the State Central Committeeman of the 3rd Congressional District in the March Democratic primary (against Madigan).

In my race against Madigan, I don’t paint him as some cartoon villain; but, I point out the obvious – the current status quo lays squarely at his feet. Rauner is terrible, but Illinois’ problems didn’t begin during his term. Madigan and the cogs in his machine had plenty of opportunities to make changes. They failed. Now, it’s time for something new.

I will propose a number of changes to the party, to make it more open to independent voices. Like the progressives of the late 19th century, who broke the party bosses of their day by turning towards proportional representation, I believe we need to change the rules that govern our elections. I argue for multimember districts, proportional representation and public financing of elections. Cross-national studies have shown that democracies with such insitutions have greater trust in government, higher turnout, lower polarization and more diverse legislatures. Moreover, I will argue for a bold progressive economic and social agenda, which should have as it’s centerpiece, the necessity of a single payer health care system.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

14 Comments
  1. - One hand //ing - Wednesday, Dec 6, 17 @ 10:39 am:

    ===All of this is to say that I have decided to run as an independent against whoever buys the Democratic primary for Congress, and for the State Central Committeeman of the 3rd Congressional District in the March Democratic primary ===

    Who’s going to break it to the kid that his plan isn’t legal?


  2. - Juice - Wednesday, Dec 6, 17 @ 10:45 am:

    Rich, maybe I misunderstood the McCann thing from the other day, but did you explain to him that he can’t run in the primary for State Central Committee and then file to run as an independent for the Congressional seat?


  3. - A Jack - Wednesday, Dec 6, 17 @ 10:50 am:

    PhD from Princeton and he is claiming that the other candidates are wealthy. Sorry, but I am not buying the “elect me because I am poor” story.


  4. - Hamlet's Ghost - Wednesday, Dec 6, 17 @ 10:53 am:

    Setting everything else aside, “multimember districts” are an easy remedy to reduce the effectiveness of gerrymandering.


  5. - Fax Machine - Wednesday, Dec 6, 17 @ 11:04 am:

    I wonder if Dan Proft gets interested in this race.


  6. - Fax Machine - Wednesday, Dec 6, 17 @ 11:07 am:

    This could be an interesting race for Madigan. The 13th Ward & 22nd District are not a huge portion of the district and all the other places have seen all the anti-Madigan ads on TV.

    Maybe Dan Biss & Chris Kennedy endorse the guy.


  7. - NoGifts - Wednesday, Dec 6, 17 @ 11:30 am:

    He sounds like a well meaning person, but I’d hate to see the “no more Lipinski” votes split. So I hope he’s not on the ballot.


  8. - RWEW - Wednesday, Dec 6, 17 @ 12:10 pm:

    =All of this is to say that I have decided to run as an independent against whoever buys the Democratic primary for Congress, and for the State Central Committeeman of the 3rd Congressional District in the March Democratic primary (against Madigan).=

    Uh, sorry dude. You can’t be an independent candidate and an elected leader of a political party.


  9. - Pieroge tirebiter - Wednesday, Dec 6, 17 @ 12:32 pm:

    Anything that splits the liberal vote is good for Lipinski.


  10. - anon2 - Wednesday, Dec 6, 17 @ 12:51 pm:

    === Setting everything else aside, “multimember districts” are an easy remedy to reduce the effectiveness of gerrymandering. ===

    Multi-member districts would also solve the problem of an all-powerful Speaker. Madigan, and briefly Daniels, gained such control only after all the independent-minded reps from three-member districts were eliminated bt Quinn’s Cutback Amendment.


  11. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Dec 6, 17 @ 12:53 pm:

    ===Multi-member districts would also solve the problem of an all-powerful Speaker===

    How?

    Simple solutions are usually neither.

    I figure MJM would just elect friendly “Republicans” in Dem-majority districts. Remember, Richard J. Daley won his first House seat as a Republican.


  12. - guy - Wednesday, Dec 6, 17 @ 1:09 pm:

    “PhD from Princeton and he is claiming that the other candidates are wealthy.”

    In what world are grad students wealthy? PHD’s actually reduce lifetime income of people.


  13. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Dec 6, 17 @ 2:46 pm:

    Meh, Tomkowiak is just your typical run-of-the-mill Polish immigrant, LGBT, Princeton PhD from Archer Heights.

    Dude’s got a heckuva story and seems thoughtful. Good on him. Make the old man work.


  14. - A Jack - Wednesday, Dec 6, 17 @ 5:34 pm:

    Guy, you mean like Dr. Henry Kissinger?


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* State Journal-Register endorses Rauner "with reservations"
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Pritzker campaign lawyer hints at defamation suit, claims campaign was never served
* Rauner says he's "trying to eradicate" the Madigan machine "cancer," but the "treatments are tough"
* Question of the day
* *** UPDATED x1 - Speaker Ryan to campaign for Davis *** Trump likely coming to Illinois to boost Bost
* Musical Interlude: Try (just a little bit harder)
* Tell me another fairytale, Grandpa
* Rauner again denies any delays at Quincy veterans' home
* "Speed dating" candidates
* Lawyer won't answer simple questions as some anonymous former Pritzker staffers speak out
* AFL-CIO launches "massive" digital ad buy
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller