* And speaking of the Tribune forum, Pritzker has a new digital ad…
Today, the JB Pritzker campaign released a new, statewide digital ad slamming Bruce Rauner in the words of his primary opponent, Jeanne Ives.
Ives “crushed” Rauner’s failed record at a meeting with the Chicago Tribune editorial board, demonstrating exactly why this failed governor refuses to take responsibility for his mismanagement of the state. The significant digital buy will target voters who need to hear about Rauner’s real record and make sure they see a member of Rauner’s own party calling out his failures.
“Bruce Rauner’s disastrous performance in front of the Chicago Tribune demonstrates exactly why this failed governor is running scared: even by his own metrics he has failed this state,” said Pritzker communications director Galia Slayen. “Rauner can’t defend his record, can’t present any accomplishments, and is getting taken to task by his own party for refusing to take charge as Illinois families pay the price.”
===If Pritzker agrees with Jeanne Ives’ view of the governor and the state, does he also agree with her hateful views towards the LGBT community and pro-choice activists? Just curious.===
This only makes sense in simple-minded binary choice bots that would like Rauner to be absolved of all his sins (like fibbing to a Catholic Cardinal) and hold everyone else accountable for their own sins.
Complex thoughts are tough for you. Got it.
- People Over Parties - Wednesday, Jan 31, 18 @ 9:23 am:
Like I said, just curious. I have a hard time with complex thoughts so any clarification is apreciated :)
I’m confused - half of those “interrupting” examples were just Rauner telling her not to interrupt him. Am I missing something? She did what she has to do (being down 45 points) and that was be overly aggressive and combative. For someone to pretend like Rauner was equally rude and wasn’t just there to take it on the chin and get out of there is being disingenuous.