Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » *** UPDATED x1 - Alaina Hampton responds *** Madigan warns his members against sexual harassment of staff
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
*** UPDATED x1 - Alaina Hampton responds *** Madigan warns his members against sexual harassment of staff

Tuesday, Mar 6, 2018

* Press release…

Speaker Michael J. Madigan issued the following statement Tuesday:

“Over the past several weeks, I have had meetings with members, staff and lobbyists to discuss issues of sexual harassment. Due to my recent meetings with staff, I felt it necessary to address some of the concerns they raised directly with the members of the House Democratic Caucus. The statement below was delivered to the caucus this afternoon:

    “A handout you received during last week’s caucus detailed complaints brought to the chief of staff, directors, supervisors and the ethics officer over the last five years, including sexual harassment complaints made by staff against members. I want to be crystal clear - it is inappropriate for members to make sexual comments or sexual advances to, or engage in sexual relationships with, staff, whether that person is employed directly by you, the Office of the Speaker, or another caucus. This applies to both male and female legislators.

    “It is clear from my discussions that staff view you as their superiors or supervisors, and with that you are in positions of power over them. This dynamic is ripe for potential harassment. I expect each of you to treat staff with respect and keep your relationships strictly professional. If I become aware of any complaints against a member by staff, or another member, I will personally get involved to put an end to it.”

*** UPDATE *** Alaina Hampton press release…

“Speaker Madigan now says he is committed to getting ‘personally involved’ in preventing sexual harassment. That may prove to be a step forward–but today, it rings hollow. The Speaker had three months to get ‘personally involved’ in my case, but took no action until he knew the story was about to come out.

“Perhaps my telling my own story publicly, combined with the EEOC’s notification of my right to sue last week, has caused the Speaker to have a revelation about his ethical and moral obligation to those who have been harassed and even assaulted in his own organization. More likely, he’s being driven to action by the threat of losing his grip on power–not by any personal concern for the well being of the women in the House Democratic Caucus or the Democratic Party of Illinois.

“I, and countless other victims and survivors, will be watching the Speaker’s next moves closely. We are hopeful that he will back up his words with meaningful and swift action.”

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - Iggy - Tuesday, Mar 6, 18 @ 2:40 pm:

    I will personally get involved, heh. You mean like you did in the past and essentially told the abusers to knock it off.

    has he seriously learned nothing from this ordeal…

  2. - anon2 - Tuesday, Mar 6, 18 @ 2:43 pm:

    I doubt any members of Madigan’s caucus take lightly his pledge to deal directly with violators. Once has to wonder if there are zero violators across the aisle?

  3. - Sugar Corn - Tuesday, Mar 6, 18 @ 2:43 pm:

    Good for the speaker. Will Cullerton, Brady and Durkin follow suit?

    Isn’t it kind of an open secret that there are rampant member-staff sexual relations in the other chamber?

  4. - Norseman - Tuesday, Mar 6, 18 @ 2:45 pm:

    Never had that worry when I was on staff. My girlfriend, then fiance and wife would have chewed them up and spit them out regardless of their status.

  5. - Retired Educator - Tuesday, Mar 6, 18 @ 3:01 pm:

    Seems pretty cut and dry by the Speaker. They have been warned. I think if he learns about untoward behavior, someone’s head will roll. Now for the rest of the leaders. They should follow quickly.

  6. - Flat Bed Ford - Tuesday, Mar 6, 18 @ 3:03 pm:

    Did the Speaker send Miss Soto a congratulations on her newborn? I mean I get his intent here but sometimes people do meet their soulmate while at work. Just sayin’.

  7. - brooker - Tuesday, Mar 6, 18 @ 3:04 pm:

    The most interesting part of this is he’s meeting with staff personally to talk about sexual harassment. To be a fly on the wall in those meetings.

  8. - Texas Red - Tuesday, Mar 6, 18 @ 3:40 pm:

    …Due to my recent meetings with staff.. This dynamic is ripe for potential harassment.

    Coming from a political machine that is embroiled in accusation of harassment this is the height of hypocrisy. MJM telling peers to do what I say not what I do !

  9. - Chicago Cynic - Tuesday, Mar 6, 18 @ 3:44 pm:

    “Due to my recent meetings with staff, I felt it necessary…” and “It is clear from my discussions that staff view you as their superiors or supervisors, and with that you are in positions of power over them.”

    Really? You just figured out that staff feel they are subordinates? With these statements the Speaker indicts himself for his previous inaction. Cmon.

  10. - Signal and Noise - Tuesday, Mar 6, 18 @ 3:56 pm:

    – I will personally get involved to put an end to it–

    “I changed the “you” to “it” Mr. Speaker. It comes off a little softer”

  11. - Pot calling kettle - Tuesday, Mar 6, 18 @ 3:59 pm:

    ==You just figured out that staff feel they are subordinates? ==

    The way some staff order members around, I can understand some confusion here…

  12. - Not It - Tuesday, Mar 6, 18 @ 5:53 pm:

    ==You just figured out that staff feel they are subordinates? ==

    Tell that to Shaw.

  13. - Shytown - Tuesday, Mar 6, 18 @ 6:58 pm:

    If anyone thought Alaina Hampton was going away quietly…think again.

  14. - Precinct Captain - Tuesday, Mar 6, 18 @ 7:28 pm:

    This could do what Bruce Rauner never will: dethrone Madigan. But wily as he is, Madigan will be as determined as ever to do anything keep his power.

  15. - Generic Drone - Tuesday, Mar 6, 18 @ 7:46 pm:

    Sexual harrassment will not be tolerated. However, it is appreciated.

  16. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Mar 6, 18 @ 8:09 pm:

    Madigan is from a different generation. He married a woman who worked as a receptionist at his law office. Would that type of relationship be tolerated today?

  17. - Snapper - Tuesday, Mar 6, 18 @ 8:20 pm:

    This won’t take out Madigan. It should, but his members don’t have the guts to stand up for what is right. The only thing his members stand up for is what is politically advantageous. The Speaker knew, his Chief of Staff knew, one of his top deputies knew, they all knew that the guy was harassing her, but only did something once it was going to the media. The fact that he is a press release instead of just making it an internal memo tells me it’s just for show more than anything.

  18. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Mar 6, 18 @ 9:13 pm:

    Hampton issued a press release because she saw what was happening - the story was dying - and her success in her potential lawsuit was dependent on pressure on the Speaker.

  19. - Responsa - Tuesday, Mar 6, 18 @ 9:51 pm:

    ==Hampton issued a press release because she saw what was happening - the story was dying==

    Or–here’s another way to look at it: Mike Madigan issued a press release because he saw what was happening. The issue was not going away as he had hoped.

  20. - Soothsayer - Tuesday, Mar 6, 18 @ 10:35 pm:

    What is an acceptable amount of time to spend on a harassment investigation? The Speaker became aware in November, right before the holidays, and responded accordingly in February. I am not sure that is terribly unreasonable. I think the greatest failure was that there was no system by which to effectively report harassment.

  21. - Who else - Wednesday, Mar 7, 18 @ 7:50 am:

    ==What is an acceptable amount of time to spend on a harassment investigation?==

    Ms. Hampton has stated that she was never made aware of any investigation. If she and her complaint were involved in an investigation, it seems like she would have been notified of that.

    Investigations involve going back and forth between parties to determine facts. What facts were rebutted by the Speaker’s organization that made it necessary to extend the alleged investigation out over the course of several months? Why weren’t those counter-arguments brought back to Ms. Hampton for her to weigh in on and give her side?

    Some questions about the investigations that have been conducted: What were the terms of this alleged investigation? What are the rules for these investigations in general? Who is interviewed? What best practices do the investigators follow? Who are the investigators? What are their qualifications? Do they work for the people they are investigating? Does that create a conflict of interest? (HINT: YES) What are the potential disciplinary actions that can be taken depending on the outcome of the investigation? What steps are taken to ensure that women do not experience retaliation? What steps are taken to make a safe environment for additional victims to come forward? What protections exist, in writing, to protect them in the investigative process?

    These questions cannot be answered. There is no real investigation process. There is no real protection for victims. There is no real accountability.

    None of this is not real.

  22. - Who else - Wednesday, Mar 7, 18 @ 7:50 am:

    TYPO: *None of this IS real.

  23. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Mar 7, 18 @ 9:04 am:

    Alaina Hampton is incredibly courageous.

  24. - A guy - Wednesday, Mar 7, 18 @ 9:13 am:

    ==who have been harassed and even assaulted===

    Assaulted….Whoa. I’d say that ups the ante.

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Pritzker "outraged" over "gross mistakes" by "irresponsible" DCFS contractor: "These children are our children"
* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Judge knocks down Deerfield assault weapons ban
* Question of the day
* Pritzker appoints 5 new SIU trustees
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Fundraiser lists
* "It’s a car in a very small tunnel"
* Illinois Family Institute calls legislator a "feticidal maniac"
* DCFS contract caseworker under investigation
* It's just a bill
* College Illinois bailout will cost state $501 million
* After Sterigenics shutdown, EPA testing shows "a pretty rapid drop" in cancer-causing chemical emissions
* Moylan's "go slow on pot" resolution reaches majority support
* Chicago isn't the outlier, Downstate is
* Dueling arguments
* Another self-own
* *** UPDATED x1 - Daniels responds *** Strip club manager's "fears" are unfounded
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...











Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller