Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » ISRA, Drury both try to claim Raoul inserted “poison pill” into gun bill
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
ISRA, Drury both try to claim Raoul inserted “poison pill” into gun bill

Friday, Mar 16, 2018 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Illinois Review

A measure that banned the controversial bump stocks when it passed the Illinois House could be “poisoned” in the Illinois Senate with an amendment proposed by Democrat Sen. Kwame Raoul of Chicago. The Illinois State Rifle Association calls Raoul’s change a “poison pill.”

Raoul’s Senate Amendment 1 would roll back municipal preemption that passed the Illinois legislature in 2013 as a vital part of the concealed carry agreement. “Specifically it repeals the preemption on long guns and allows municipalities to ban any long guns they see fit,” the ISRA website says.

“Instead of having a uniform state law, where everyone knows the rules, Illinois will have a patchwork of inconsistent local gun laws - with good people unknowingly becoming criminals as they travel the state,” ISRA says.

Raoul’s change is deliberately divisive when there is broad, bi-partisan agreement on bump stocks - especially notable since Raoul is running in the March 20th primary to be the Democrat Party’s nominee for attorney general.

* Rep. Scott Drury…

Earlier today, State Representative Scott Drury (D-Highwood) blasted State Senator Kwame Raoul (D-Chicago) for gutting Illinois’ proposed bump stock ban: “As students around the country were walking out of schools to honor the slain students in Parkland, Florida and advocate for more responsible gun laws, Raoul was slaughtering Illinois’ proposed bump stock ban in order to appease the Illinois State Rifle Association,” said Drury. “This continues Raoul’s horrendous record on assault weapons.”

At issue is the bump stock ban that has been working its way through the Illinois General Assembly. The Illinois House recently passed a bill that would have banned bump stocks and trigger cranks – devices that allow semi-automatic weapons to fire at a much greater pace.

Raoul sponsored the bill in the Senate. However, before presenting the bill, Raoul admittedly cut a deal with the Illinois State Rifle Association, the effect of which was to gut the ban. The amended bill only prohibits devices that are intended to increase the rate of a gun’s fire to that of a “fully automatic firearm.” “The glaring problem with the Raoul-gun lobby amendment is that bump stocks can be manufactured to allow guns to fire hundreds of rounds per minute, yet still not be considered fully automatic,” Drury said. “This bait and switch is why people hate politicians”.

Drury also took issue with Raoul’s insertion of a poison pill into his amended bill. In 2013, Raoul began his partnership with the NRA, teaming with it to prohibit towns from passing assault weapons bans. Before that misguided legislation went into effect, Drury successfully raced to get numerous towns in his district to pass assault weapons bans.

“While Raoul’s amended bill removes the prohibition on assault weapons bans, it makes the bill virtually impossible to pass in the House”, said Drury. According to Drury, the requisite number of votes do not exist in the House, and Raoul knows that. “Raoul should be ashamed of himself,” Drury stated. “He talks a good game about responsible gun laws and then makes sure those laws can’t pass. When it comes to protecting our children from deadly assault weapons, Raoul has no credibility.”

Drury said that as one of the primary leaders in the General Assembly for responsible gun laws, he has been contacted by numerous advocates upset with what the advocates call Raoul’s betrayal. According to Drury, Raoul is essentially acting like former President George W. Bush – declaring “Mission Accomplished” when, in fact, virtually nothing has been accomplished.

The bill is here.

* From Sen. Raoul’s campaign in reaction to Drury’s claims…

This week Sen. Raoul passed a bipartisan comprehensive proposal to help make our communities safer which was supported by law enforcement and gun violence prevention advocates. Rep. Drury’s desperate mischaracterization gets to the heart of why he’s been ineffective during his time in Springfield.

The language regarding bump stocks came from Senator Morrison’s legislation. The Rifle Association language he’s referring to came from the Illinois State Police.

Wednesday can’t come soon enough.

…Adding… From Rep. Drury…

Rich:

As a follow-up to our press release, during debate, Senator Raoul specifically stated:

    “Mr. President, I should note that the definition of bump stock and trigger crank in this bill has been amended to take in recommendations from the Illinois State Rifle Association.”

Sen. Raoul made no mention of the Illinois State Police.

Scott R. Drury

       

15 Comments
  1. - Perrid - Friday, Mar 16, 18 @ 2:48 pm:

    When local gov agrees with conservatives, they are all for local control. When it sides against them, then they say, “oh no, we have to have one standardized, one-size-fits-all rule. It’s better and more efficient.”


  2. - anon2 - Friday, Mar 16, 18 @ 2:55 pm:

    So was Sen. Rauol for statewide pre-emption before he was against it?


  3. - wordslinger - Friday, Mar 16, 18 @ 2:58 pm:

    –“Instead of having a uniform state law, where everyone knows the rules, Illinois will have a patchwork of inconsistent local gun laws - with good people unknowingly becoming criminals as they travel the state,” ISRA says.–

    Yeah. Who the heck travels without their AR-15? How can you be safe with just your concealed handgun?


  4. - 47th Ward - Friday, Mar 16, 18 @ 2:59 pm:

    ===Scott R. Drury===

    Here’s a QOTD: What does the R stand for?


  5. - City Zen - Friday, Mar 16, 18 @ 3:07 pm:

    What specific carcinogens does Raoul’s poison pill contain?


  6. - Anon - Friday, Mar 16, 18 @ 3:22 pm:

    Scott Drury, definitely not grandstanding for Tuesday. Time’s running out and Scott’s still without a clock.


  7. - szahn - Friday, Mar 16, 18 @ 3:32 pm:

    –Anon–My guess is Drury knows it’s time for Raoul to stop pretending he is a true advocate for responsible gun laws.


  8. - Amalia - Friday, Mar 16, 18 @ 3:34 pm:

    drury is going no where. but Raoul is the inheritor of the Obama seat (as we are reminded in every commercial) so playing both sides of an issue is something that seems to go with that position.


  9. - RNUG - Friday, Mar 16, 18 @ 3:49 pm:

    Almost everyone is OK with banning bump stocks, but trying to remove state preemption on gun control will just rile up the NRA. That was a hot topic in their April publication. And I’ve gotten a call a day for the last three days over Illinois gun bills.

    If they want to get the bump stock ban passed, they need to defeat / remove Raoul’s amendment.


  10. - wordslinger - Friday, Mar 16, 18 @ 4:20 pm:

    –Here’s a QOTD: What does the R stand for?–

    Reform, of course.

    Every Illinois politician is a reformer.


  11. - Precinct Captain - Friday, Mar 16, 18 @ 4:40 pm:

    Drury is so whiny. It’s really unbecoming.


  12. - Mama - Friday, Mar 16, 18 @ 4:42 pm:

    How does this amendment remove state preemption on gun control?


  13. - Swift - Friday, Mar 16, 18 @ 4:45 pm:

    Drury has a point, “fully automatic weapon” is not defined in the criminal code and the qualification that a rifle with a bump stock is not a machine gun, makes the bump stock “ban” unenforceable.

    Too bad the legal nuance won’t make a good TV ad, and I foresee Rauol running ads that he’s the father of the bump stock ban in Illinois.


  14. - Last Bull Moose - Friday, Mar 16, 18 @ 4:57 pm:

    If municipalities can ban any long gun, then there is a problem. Any person passing through or stopping in the town could break the he law. Even if the weapon is properly cased and in a vehicle as per state law.

    I’m not voting for Raoul anyway. Can’t tell if this charge is true.


  15. - Anonymous - Friday, Mar 16, 18 @ 5:06 pm:

    == How does this amendment remove state preemption on gun control? ==

    From Rich’s post:

    Raoul’s Senate Amendment 1 would roll back municipal preemption that passed the Illinois legislature in 2013 as a vital part of the concealed carry agreement. “Specifically it repeals the preemption on long guns and allows municipalities to ban any long guns they see fit,” the ISRA website says.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* Live coverage
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller