Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » State’s attorneys say Rauner’s proposed death penalty change is “unprecedented and untested”
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
State’s attorneys say Rauner’s proposed death penalty change is “unprecedented and untested”

Tuesday, May 29, 2018 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Bernie

The organization that represents top state prosecutors in Illinois’ 102 counties is expressing caution about any quick moves to reinstate the death penalty in Illinois.

While the death penalty hasn’t been carried out in Illinois since 1999 and was abolished by the General Assembly in 2011, Gov. Bruce Rauner injected a reinstatement of the penalty in specific cases — multiple murder or murder of a police officer — via an amendatory veto on May 14, less than three weeks before Thursday’s scheduled end of the legislative session. And, Rauner said, because of problems with sentencing innocent people to death in Illinois in the past, he would call for the penalty only in cases where convictions were “beyond all doubt.” […]

The three-page letter from Sangamon County State’s Attorney John Milhiser, who wrote the letter on behalf of the Illinois State’s Attorneys Association] noted that the statement grew from a meeting of the statewide group of state’s attorneys in response to Rauner’s amendatory veto of House Bill 4618 — which originally extended a 72-hour waiting period to purchase of “assault” weapons.

“Reinstating the death penalty for a narrow category of violent criminals is a matter of significant public interest,” states the letter, which was presented to the House’s judiciary committee that handles criminal law. “The proposed standard of beyond all doubt, however, is unprecedented and untested in American jurisprudence. For more than 240 years the burden of proof in criminal cases has been beyond a reasonable doubt. It must be ensured that no innocent person is executed. However, changing the burden of proof to a ‘beyond all doubt’ standard is complex and involves constitutional and legal concerns that cannot be evaluated in the brief time thus far allotted.”

The full letter is here.

* Related…

* Conservative group slams effort to reinstate death penalty in Illinois: Heather Beaudoin is the coordinator of Conservatives Concerned About the Death Penalty, a network of political and social conservatives who question the alignment of capital punishment with conservative principles and values. She said arguments in favor of the death penalty often don’t withstand scrutiny. “The idea of the death penalty being a deterrent … we’ve just not seen it to be true,” Beaudoin said. “These situations are crimes of passion, often, where the person perpetrating the crime is not thinking about consequences. And I get sort of heated when I hear folks say, ‘We have to have the death penalty for victim’s family members,’ because I’ve personally spoken with so many of them who say it was the opposite of helpful.”

* They got death for killing a cop, but not for killing a guard: Where’s justice?: The death in February of Chicago Police Cmdr. Paul Bauer was heinous. He was shot dead in the Loop while bravely doing his job. But was Cmdr. Bauer’s life worth more than that of Shaquita Bennett, who was gunned down in April, allegedly by an ex-boyfriend who had stalked her for years? Were the lives of Bauer and Bennett worth more than that of 8-year-old Gizzell Ford who was used as a punching bag, whipped with a belt and deprived of food, water and sleep for days by her grandmother before she was strangled?

* League of Women Voters: Reject proposed return of death penalty in Illinois

* Extended Interview: Reps. C.D. Davidsmeyer and Christian Mitchell debate death penalty, gun control

       

8 Comments
  1. - wordslinger - Tuesday, May 29, 18 @ 10:15 am:

    –State’s attorneys say Rauner’s proposed death penalty change is “unprecedented and untested”–

    They’re looking at it the wrong way.

    Demagoguing the death plenty for personal political gains has plenty of precedent over a long period of time.

    You weren’t expecting a rational, informed discussion from Rauner on the subject, were you? Like he was some kind of responsible leader in a democratic republic?

    Not his style.


  2. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, May 29, 18 @ 10:15 am:

    ===“The proposed standard of beyond all doubt, however, is unprecedented and untested in American jurisprudence. For more than 240 years the burden of proof in criminal cases has been beyond a reasonable doubt. It must be ensured that no innocent person is executed. However, changing the burden of proof to a ‘beyond all doubt’ standard is complex and involves constitutional and legal concerns that cannot be evaluated in the brief time thus far allotted.”===

    Meh. It’s not that at all.

    Well, sure it IS all that and more, that IS true, but what it really-really, truly is… it’s a pandering to utter phoniness that IS Bruce Rauner with a slight dog whistle masked by this premise that the death penalty can come back by some new ridiculous standard not found in law.

    This is the type of ridiculousness you get when you sign HB40, have criminal justice reform as an accomplishment, and your right flank thinks you signed “sanctuary state” legislation… but can’t explain what it is, in fear it sounds just as bad when you explain what it really does.

    Rauner is a phony… “… is unprecedented and untested in American jurisprudence. For more than 240 years the burden of proof in criminal cases has been beyond a reasonable doubt. It must be ensured that no innocent person is executed. However, changing the burden of proof to a ‘beyond all doubt’ standard is complex and involves constitutional and legal concerns that cannot be evaluated in the brief time thus far allotted.”

    Exactly right.


  3. - HL Mencken - Tuesday, May 29, 18 @ 10:16 am:

    In a discussion this weekend I learned that this was written as an amendatory veto. How can anyone believe this is constitutional? If it is then the next Governor next year could by amendatory veto enact eligibility for Medicare for all uninsured Illinoisans by an amendatory veto of any health bill enacted by the GA.


  4. - Retired Educator - Tuesday, May 29, 18 @ 11:13 am:

    The attempt to revive the death penalty, is nothing more then Rauner’s attempt to endear himself to the ultra-conservative wing of the Republican Party. It is never going anywhere and Rauner knows it. He is at 26% and I don’t see it getting much better. The BTIA is a clown show, that has no real understanding of the voting public.


  5. - Langhorne - Tuesday, May 29, 18 @ 11:26 am:

    The AV is unconstitutional. Who is rauners legal counsel? If counsel reviewed it, their advice was obviously ignored in favor of political expediency. Nothing new. Message first, last, and always.


  6. - DarkHorse - Tuesday, May 29, 18 @ 11:54 am:

    Since Rauner’s death penalty proposal is all about politics, I wonder what his AG pick - who has previously opposed capital punishment - thinks about this?


  7. - anon - Tuesday, May 29, 18 @ 12:44 pm:

    The opposition response asking if x is more valuable than y is nonsense. The identity of the victim already impacts charging and sentencing. For example, see the laws for assault and battery which increase the class (and sentence) based upon the victim. Hate crimes statutes add an entire charge based upon the victim (and motive of the defendant).


  8. - Actual Red - Tuesday, May 29, 18 @ 4:01 pm:

    @anon
    I’d quibble with your characterization of hate crime laws. For hate crimes, identity of the victim matters only in relation to motive of the offender. The statute says that a person commits a hate crime when they commit the crime

    “by reason of the actual or perceived race, color, creed, religion, ancestry, gender, sexual orientation, physical or mental disability, or national origin of another individual or group of individuals.”

    It doesn’t specify that the victim must be a member of any particular class, just that their membership of a specific class was the reason for the crime. Every person is a member of multiple protected classes.

    http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/documents/072000050k12-7.1.htm


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* After calls for her resignation, Harmon says Feigenholtz 'will need to do additional work in order to rebuild trust with her colleagues and constituents'
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Fundraiser list
* GOP pollster has Sorensen ahead by 6; Fioretti closing ad focuses on Dem opposition to Burke; Suburban man charged after punching election judge
* More on election security
* Showcasing The Retailers Who Make Illinois Work
* Question of the day
* C'mon, Harry
* Your early voting reports
* Chicago Bears open thread
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today's edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller