Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » My favorite Statehouse tweets of the week
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
My favorite Statehouse tweets of the week

Thursday, May 31, 2018

* These two made me chuckle…


* And these are from last night’s ERA debate in the House…



- Posted by Rich Miller        

20 Comments
  1. - Grand Avenue - Thursday, May 31, 18 @ 11:04 am:

    Everyone seems a lot happier when they’re getting their paycheck on time and they sense they’ll be done on May 31st.

    Funny how that works


  2. - Nearly Normal - Thursday, May 31, 18 @ 11:05 am:

    Can we get someone from St. Louis to go check Phyllis Schlafly’s tomb in Calvary Cemetery? I wonder if she flipped over in her grave to know Illinois passed ERA.


  3. - JoanP - Thursday, May 31, 18 @ 11:14 am:

    Oh, Zach for the win! That’s the funniest thing I’ve seen in ages.


  4. - A guy - Thursday, May 31, 18 @ 11:21 am:

    I guess Lou and Steve are enjoying their new found equality out in the open. This legislation means split the dinner bill I guess.


  5. - end? - Thursday, May 31, 18 @ 11:24 am:

    These are great. I have to say though that anyone who remembers how hot and gross it was in the capitol before they fixed the AC will never complain about being cold.


  6. - Lefty Lefty - Thursday, May 31, 18 @ 11:28 am:

    Man I wish Rep. Andersson was running again. He would be the first Republican I’ve ever voted for. It stinks that voting your conscience makes you a target these days.


  7. - paddyrollingstone - Thursday, May 31, 18 @ 11:31 am:

    when I was a kid my dad was in the House and they would routinely be in session all of June. My brothers and sister and I would come down to spend part of the month in the capitol working as honorary pages. I have vivid memories of the huge pro and anti ERA demonstrations under the Rotunda and recall that someone (not sure if they were pro or anti-ERA) riding in on a horse.

    I also remember the feelings that the ERA engendered. The mother of one of our Catholic school classmates and friends of my dad told him that they would never vote for him or come to his fundraisers because of his pro-ERA vote.


  8. - wordslinger - Thursday, May 31, 18 @ 12:04 pm:

    Hannah Meisel

    @hannahmeisel
    How about this one?

    – 15h15 hours ago
    More Hannah Meisel Retweeted Sam Dunklau
    Just overheard @kmcconnaughay33 (R-St. Charles) say it’s her first time voting for a budget. Actually true of a lot of Republicans.–


  9. - JS Mill - Thursday, May 31, 18 @ 12:27 pm:

    The precise reason we needed ERA is for people who think like this……

    =I guess Lou and Steve are enjoying their new found equality out in the open. This legislation means split the dinner bill I guess.=


  10. - A guy - Thursday, May 31, 18 @ 1:13 pm:

    JS, move on to the decaf. This is a fun thread, asking for fun answers. Look at the picture again. These two guys are overjoyed with each other, surrounded by women, who by my estimation, would be the ones most encouraged by the passing.

    I’m not moved either way by this. I don’t think the bill is historic, memorable or consequential. Because; Fortunately, everything the poorly constructed language in the ERA was meant to address has been addressed over many years by decent people of every human stripe.

    Your petty, foolish, judgmental comment says everything about what a un-dimensional person you are. You’re a flack for one thing, and so many others make a better case for that than you. Pound sand. You have no idea what I may have done in regard to equal rights. An educator ought to be better.

    Have a little fun. That’s what the post was for.


  11. - Da Big Bad Wolf - Thursday, May 31, 18 @ 3:02 pm:

    Is Lou’s hand above or below Andersson’s underpants line?


  12. - 47th Ward - Thursday, May 31, 18 @ 3:19 pm:

    ===the poorly constructed language in the ERA===

    You keep saying that but you still haven’t offered any concrete suggestions to “improve it.” Why are you so afraid of spelling out exactly how the Amendment should be written?


  13. - A guy - Thursday, May 31, 18 @ 4:14 pm:

    Actually I did. Go back and look it up.


  14. - A guy - Thursday, May 31, 18 @ 4:20 pm:

    And very seriously 47, at this point in time, with all of the progress made through the Equal Protection Clause in the Constitution, don’t you think there could be a more specific request than a 35 year old failed, extended, failed again amendment?

    Listening to the Female AA Legislators yesterday, made me consider even more that there is some opportunity to offer greater inclusion to women of color.

    This bill yesterday is symbolic to be sure, but it accomplishes absolutely nothing. It comes off as a Legislative version of an advisory referendum designed to do something outside of what it might intend. Guess we’ll see if it does.


  15. - wordslinger - Thursday, May 31, 18 @ 4:38 pm:

    –Actually I did. Go back and look it up.–

    Tried Guy, no luck. Little help? Or, you know, you could just write it now.


  16. - 47th Ward - Thursday, May 31, 18 @ 4:38 pm:

    Really Guy? I am not terribly adept at searching Rich’s archives and haven’t been able to find it. Can you tell me which day you left that particular comment?

    If not, just tell me which of the 24 words below you changed?

    “Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.”

    And no, I don’t think there could be a more specific request even with the 14th Amendment. Perhaps it is largely symbolic, which isn’t your point I know, but I think the symbolism is still relevant and important.

    But it’s moot now.


  17. - A guy - Thursday, May 31, 18 @ 7:31 pm:

    “Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State to any human being on account of gender, creed, race, or any category of personal preference. Further, every reference to “man or men” in the Constitution shall be construed to include woman or women pertaining to rights included therein”.

    I’d include language to assume legal status, be it citizenship, legal alien status, work visas, etc.


  18. - 47th Ward - Thursday, May 31, 18 @ 7:52 pm:

    Thanks Guy. And you think your changes would have increased the chances of passage previously? I’m not so sure. It seems to me that the Phyllis Schlaflys and Jeanne Ives of the world would find much more to gripe about in your version than they “found” in the version that finally passed.

    But I do appreciate your answer. Sincerely.


  19. - A guy - Thursday, May 31, 18 @ 9:22 pm:

    You’re not wrong 47. My version wouldn’t be written to please Rep. Ives or Ms. Schlafly. It would try to more specifically deal with inequities that are more contemporary as our society has changed. I was struck very much by the AA Women Reps who spoke last night who pointed out correctly (in my view) that the ERA didn’t offer any real spelled out equity for them. Or Latina women. It certainly didn’t offer anything for the categories of persons who might face discrimination in our time. I don’t think the framers meant to deliberately not protect women. They were people of their time who didn’t envision 1850 or 1920, let alone 2018. Protecting their husbands and sons was likely seen as protecting them.

    I’ve never understood why there wasn’t a new draft of what this amendment was attempting to do; rid our nation of any discrimination of any kind for any reason. They got it right; that every “person” was entitled to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. It just took too long for our free society to continue to adapt the principle. That’s on all of us.

    Rep Mary Flowers made tremendous sense to me. What we were doing for anyone, we should achieve for everyone.

    Government is good at a very short list of things because of it’s mere size. Institutionalizing decency and fairness is one of those things. In fact, I believe it’s the only entity that can do so large of a task. I want everything for my wife, my sisters, my daughters and granddaughters, that I want for myself, my brothers, my sons and my grandsons. Anyone who doesn’t really isn’t allowing their own legacy to thrive.

    Appreciate your sincere response.


  20. - 47th Ward - Thursday, May 31, 18 @ 10:04 pm:

    Well said Guy. Thanks.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* If you're Dick Lockhart's friend, please get in touch with him ASAP
* Reader comments closed for the holiday weekend
* *** UPDATED x2 - "Agreed to step down" *** Pritzker withdraws nomination of Cesar Santoy to Tollway board
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Afternoon update
* Question of the day
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Fundraiser list
* *** UPDATED x2 *** Sanguinetti bows out of congressional race
* Open Letter: The University Of Illinois Must Protect First Amendment Rights
* *** UPDATED x2 - Sandoval submitted chairmanship resignation letter *** Sandoval's chairmanship appears to have been yanked
* *** UPDATED x19 *** Senate Democrats release unredacted Sandoval search warrant
* Take it easy
* Forbes: Gov. Pritzker is 6th wealthiest Illinoisan
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller