Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » Raoul, special prosecutor meet to discuss Van Dyke sentence
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Raoul, special prosecutor meet to discuss Van Dyke sentence

Tuesday, Feb 5, 2019

* Background is here if you need it. From WBEZ

Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul and Special Prosecutor Joseph McMahon had what they say was a “productive” phone call on Monday about possibilities for challenging the sentence of Jason Van Dyke, the former Chicago police officer convicted of murder in Laquan McDonald’s killing.

The sentence, handed down last month, would allow Van Dyke’s release from prison in as few as three years. Police accountability advocates have characterized that penalty as far too lenient.

Raoul and McMahon “are both continuing their review and will make a decision on next steps once they have finished their review,” the attorney general’s spokeswoman Annie Thompson said after the call.

Chris Nelson, a McMahon spokesman, said the call lasted 45 minutes and was the first conversation about the case between the attorney general and special prosecutor.

An option previously raised by McMahon is asking the Illinois Supreme Court to overturn the sentencing.

* Sun-Times

“This is part of the process to decide whether to go forward with a challenge to the sentence,” [McMahon’s spokesman] Christopher Nelson said.

McMahon has said he plans to decide by March 1 on whether to petition the state Supreme Court to file a writ of mandamus, which is an order that would send the case back to Gaughan for a new, likely longer, prison sentence.

Civil rights activists and Laquan McDonald’s family have called for a harsher sentence for Van Dyke, who was convicted in the teen’s death in early October. Van Dyke could be released in fewer than four years with credit for good behavior. Raoul, a former state senator from Chicago who was sworn in days before the sentencing hearing, had said his office was reviewing whether state law mandated a stiffer sentence for Van Dyke.

Nelson said McMahon, who is the state’s attorney for Kane County, had called for Monday’s conference call.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - wondering - Tuesday, Feb 5, 19 @ 11:12 am:

    I caught McMahon on WTTW at 7 last night. He is impressive, very impressive. His circumspection come across as exactly that, not dodging. He doesn’t say what he doesn’t know. He leavens the opinions he does express with humility. He said this has been an eye opener. I hope we hear more from him.

  2. - Sue - Tuesday, Feb 5, 19 @ 11:23 am:

    McMahon came across on WTTW last night as a very thoughtful sincere official not anxious to muck up his conviction by filing a political appeal. Hopefully he convinces our new AG who is hardly a well respected attorney and one with little actual criminal trial experience

  3. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Feb 5, 19 @ 11:24 am:

    ===not anxious to muck up his conviction by filing a political appeal===

    Horse hockey.

  4. - the Edge - Tuesday, Feb 5, 19 @ 11:30 am:

    When a judge takes the side of one lone dissenting Supreme it seems reasonable to appeal to the other Supremes for clarification on state sentencing guidelines.

  5. - West Side the Best Side - Tuesday, Feb 5, 19 @ 11:46 am:

    As Mr. McMahon pointed out last night, even if the Supreme Court granted the mandamus, they would likely limit themselves to ordering the trial court to enter a sentence in the Agg Batt Firearm count, not order a specific sentence. Judge Gaughan could enter a 6 year sentence, which would require more time at 85%, but which would drive people crazy because it looks like less time. He also alluded to the possibility that the Court could raise other issues, presumably whether the change of venue motion should have been granted, which if allowed, would start things from scratch. And yes, if the AG gets involved in this case, considering the tens of thousands of local county criminal cases it doesn’t get involved in, it would be political. There was a perfectly competent prosecutor handling the case at the trial court level and, while there is nothing wrong with the consultation between the two, it would be very out of the ordinary if the AG initiates the filing of a mandamus petition.

  6. - the Patriot - Tuesday, Feb 5, 19 @ 12:01 pm:

    Time for the AG to have an adult conversation about the big picture. He wants to end violence in Chicago, but wants to discourage police from going to neighborhood where they are likely to be required to use force.

    There are bad apples and there is no defending that. But policy decisions that are going to make it impossible to prevent 500 shootings next year so you can make an example of one bad officer are counter productive.

  7. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Feb 5, 19 @ 12:02 pm:

    ===wants to discourage police===

    Again… Horse hockey.

  8. - PC - Tuesday, Feb 5, 19 @ 12:08 pm:

    The AG is going to be getting involved in this issue one way or another. There are at least two prisoners and likely many more in identical circumstances to Van Dyke who are serving longer sentences based on the majority opinion in Lee. If the AG does nothing here, thus signaling its agreement with the dissenting opinion in Lee, the AG will probably end up defending against a mandamus petition filed by one of them. Is the AG going to respond by saying that it chose to let Van Dyke serve an illegally low sentence? Good luck with that.

  9. - JoanP - Tuesday, Feb 5, 19 @ 2:55 pm:

    =they would likely limit themselves to ordering the trial court to enter a sentence in the Agg Batt Firearm count, not order a specific sentence. =

    Except that there are *sixteen* Agg Batt counts, and there’s an issue of whether or not they should run consecutively.

    The court could also send this to another judge, which I have known them to do.

    =the Court could raise other issues, presumably whether the change of venue motion should have been granted=

    They *could*, but it’s pretty unlikely. They tend to avoid ruling on issues that are not raised by the parties.

  10. - West Side the Best Side - Tuesday, Feb 5, 19 @ 5:07 pm:

    JoanP - You are right about the Court being unlikely to raise other issues, especially in a mandamus case where the petition here is to order the judge to follow case law. Sometimes appellate level courts do find issues on their own they want the parties to address that neither side had raised on appeal, it is rare but not unheard of. As far as the 16 Agg Batt counts, there is the “One Act - One Crime” doctrine that will come into play. “We hold, therefore, that when more than one offense arises from a series of incidental or closely related acts and the offenses are not, by definition, lesser included offenses, convictions with concurrent sentences can be entered.” People v. King, 66 Ill. 551, 556 (1977), which was followed in the 2009 case of People v. Artis. It would be hard to argue those shots were not all closely related acts. That determination is one that would have to be made on a case by case basis, thus a discretionary decision by the trial court, rather than a mandamus argument that following case law is mandatory. Not knowing what the possible mandamus petition, which is by its nature a petition seeking to force a public official to perform a mandated duty, is going to raise, it’s all conjecture on all our parts at this point.

TrackBack URI

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Question of the day
* Illinois counties with high firearm suicide rates tend to be "gun sanctuaries"
* It's just a bill
* HRO chair wants to kick Chicago out of Illinois
* About that expungement issue
* All rise!
* Prizker nixes state bailout for private foundation
* Bluhm's "penalty box" language could apply to... Bluhm?
* PPP poll: 58 percent support governor's "Fair Tax" in targeted House districts
* When Will The Illinois House Pass the Reproductive Health Act?
* High-speed rail advocates call Pritzker capital bill "retrograde"
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Addendum to today's edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Revenue Committee sends Pritzker's constitutional amendment to House floor
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...










Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller