Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » It’s (still) just a bill
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
It’s (still) just a bill

Wednesday, Jun 19, 2019

* I didn’t realize this was a thing anymore, either

Stephanie’s last name is Johnson. Though she no longer wants it to be, she said it’s too much work to change.

But a new law, awaiting Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker’s signature, is designed to remedy that for divorced individuals (usually women) looking to revert to their maiden names, eliminating the legal requirement of publishing a notice in a newspaper in that circumstance.

“Is that even a thing anymore? It’s completely intrusive and ridiculous that I have to publicly announce this in a newspaper,” said Johnson, a 36-year-old Aurora mother of two who has been divorced for about six years. She said she looked into changing her name a few years ago but her efforts stalled after learning the process was more labor intensive than when she changed to her married name.

After hearing a similar complaint from a divorced friend, state Sen. Cristina Castro, D-Elgin, said she was inspired to sponsor legislation to eliminate the newspaper publication requirement for divorced women so it’s more in line with changing a name with a marriage certificate in hand.

As the law stands now, a person must pay for a legal notice in a newspaper as part of the court process for changing a name. There’s an exception if the person has a court-issued marriage certificate. Castro’s legislation would also add a divorce judgment to that.

Good riddance.

But it isn’t a law until it’s signed.

* Another one

Legislation which would have mandated diversity on Illinois’ publicly traded corporate boards quietly passed the Senate before adjournment and recently went to Gov. J.B. Pritzker for his signature. Significantly altered from its original version, which would have imposed fines on violators, the law now mandates only that companies report on their websites the demographics of their board and executive team and how they are promoting diversity in the workplace. The state will also issue an annual report card.

Throughout the debate leading up to passage, one point was consistently overlooked. Corporate boards will still have the right to choose their members. The law may open doors for women and minorities, but it won’t guarantee a seat at the table. That leaves the responsibility up to the individual.

Again, it hasn’t been signed into law yet.

* Nope. Not yet

Legalization advocates scored their biggest win of the year in Illinois, where Gov. J.B. Pritzker (D) signed a recreational marijuana bill into law earlier this month.

* Related…

* Reeder: With job screening, human intelligence better than AI

* Pharmacies back bill instituting state oversight of pharmacy benefit managers

- Posted by Rich Miller        

13 Comments
  1. - anon2 - Wednesday, Jun 19, 19 @ 1:48 pm:

    The kind of diversity that corporate boards need is to have some rank-and-file workers on them. Germany and some other EU countries have that requirement. That’s why CEO salaries are not as disproportionate to the workforce in Germany as they are here where workers aren’t on boards.


  2. - InTheKnow - Wednesday, Jun 19, 19 @ 1:51 pm:

    This is just another example of being behind the time forcing items to be published in the paper that no one reads. Just like school districts having to publish in a local newspaper about their budget, tax levy, and annual financial report, its a way for newspapers to justify their existence.


  3. - Amalia - Wednesday, Jun 19, 19 @ 1:54 pm:

    really? never heard about that law before. thought the rule was you can use a name if there is no intent to defraud. of course, easiest to just not change it in the first place. btw, can those writing/talking about the name issue please use the term “birth name” for women and men. the whole “maiden name” thing is ridiculous. unless you use another such term for men.


  4. - Wonderful World - Wednesday, Jun 19, 19 @ 2:07 pm:

    And can we change the law so that the voting record stays with the person - even through a name change? Please?


  5. - Grandson of Man - Wednesday, Jun 19, 19 @ 2:13 pm:

    Bad reporting by The Hill, on Pritzker signing the marijuana bill.

    Too bad that New York won’t legalize marijuana this year. It makes us look very good on that front, how we threaded the needle just right and worked very hard to get enough votes.


  6. - Still Waiting - Wednesday, Jun 19, 19 @ 2:26 pm:

    When the name change bill went through, I noticed my rep and other eastern bloc members voted no. Why on earth? Disgraceful.


  7. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Jun 19, 19 @ 2:30 pm:

    ===Why on earth?===

    They got into a groove of voting against just about everything for a while.


  8. - RNUG - Wednesday, Jun 19, 19 @ 2:46 pm:

    We can argue about newspaper publication requirement but it is a public notice and does serve s purpose. Any number of name changes must currently be published, things like adoption and using a business name are just two that come to mind off the top of my head. As is the requirement to publish estate claim notices.

    If there was an easily searchable source for publishing such changes / filings not involving a newspaper, then I could possibly see dropping the newspaper requirement. I believe some of the counties allow searches of all court filings, but others don’t have the capability.


  9. - Amalia - Wednesday, Jun 19, 19 @ 3:14 pm:

    how does one change their name to the name of a person to whom they are married? don’t you just start using another name? so you have to go to court to change something that you did not formally do in the first place?


  10. - Michelle Flaherty - Wednesday, Jun 19, 19 @ 3:34 pm:

    Amalia,
    No, you just don’t start using a new name. There are a lot of ridiculous hoops people — mostly women — have to jump through.
    There are companies that will do a lot of it for you because it’s such an annoying pain.
    Here’s a good summary:
    https://www.theknot.com/content/name-change-101


  11. - WineTrailHero - Wednesday, Jun 19, 19 @ 4:15 pm:

    I can’t find the bill number on the maiden name change requirements for the life of me. Anyone know what it is?


  12. - Johnnie F. - Wednesday, Jun 19, 19 @ 4:52 pm:

    Migraine today, waiting for medical expansion of cannabis. Hopefully some time soon.


  13. - Penny - Thursday, Jun 20, 19 @ 12:29 pm:

    Diversity reporting requirements are an unreasonable intrusion into the operations and decision-making of a company. It will also inhibit companies’ ability to hire the best candidate for a position, lest they face scrutiny because of numbers reported. If we should let women choose what to do with their babies why can’t we let businesses make their own choices as well? How far does “pro-choice” go?

    I would fight this if I owned a business and it became law.


TrackBack URI

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Question of the day
* Veterans Affairs official who almost became director had to resign over sexual harassment, racial slurs
* *** UPDATED x1 *** False advertising?
* Sharkey tries to have it both ways
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Skillicorn to face primary opponent
* Elections have consequences
* *** UPDATED x1 *** South suburban leaders say they got the short end of the stick yet again
* It's all show business
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Question of the day
* Pritzker addresses Hickey report
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller