Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » Question of the day
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Question of the day

Friday, Sep 6, 2019

* Now that House Republican Leader Jim Durkin has drafted legislation to allow towns like Willowbrook to close businesses like Sterigenics, should Gov. JB Pritzker call a special session or wait until the veto session, which begins October 28? Make sure to explain your answer, please.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - Grandson of Man - Friday, Sep 6, 19 @ 2:55 pm:

    It needs to happen before the company reopens, and if that’s in the veto session, fine. The residents at risk deserve nothing less.

  2. - depressed in politics - Friday, Sep 6, 19 @ 3:00 pm:

    yes, because in this political climate, public promises made should be promises kept. Whether it passes is less important than that JB lives up to his pronouncements.

  3. - Perrid - Friday, Sep 6, 19 @ 3:01 pm:

    The Guv’s statement says Sterigenics can’t open until after the Veto session. If that is true, and the newly proposed bill can take effect before it reopens, then there is no reason to waste time or money on a special session. If those things are true.

  4. - Last Bull Moose - Friday, Sep 6, 19 @ 3:09 pm:

    Keep the promise.

  5. - Thomas Paine - Friday, Sep 6, 19 @ 3:11 pm:

    I don’t think advocates want a speedy vote. They need time to analyse the bill, build consensus, and lobby Springfield.

    I don’t think the lobbyists for Sterigenics want a speedy vote. They want to milk every last drop from this cow before sending it to slaughter.

    I dont think the taxpayers want to pay for a veto session just to give Pritzker political props.

    Delaying until veto seems like a win for everyone.

  6. - Unsurprised - Friday, Sep 6, 19 @ 3:17 pm:

    Special Session. A promise is a promise.

  7. - Oswego Willy - Friday, Sep 6, 19 @ 3:22 pm:

    I’ll start here, this is the real “bad, no-win” problem tomthis;

    === ===Sterigenics’ past should not allow it to have a path to reopen===

    OK, but that’s a pretty radical departure from historical business regulation.===

    That’s the whole ball game.

    How does that go with…

    “Now that House Republican Leader Jim Durkin has drafted legislation to allow towns like Willowbrook to close businesses like Sterigenics, should Gov. JB Pritzker call a special session or wait until the veto session, which begins October 28? Make sure to explain your answer, please.”

    My commenting on this in its entirety from the beginning revolves around one key thing;

    All sides need to rally around, together, and force, together the best situation for Willowbrook, the victims, even the process.

    Targeting a lone company or industry where compliance is probably more about safety then closing in the end.

    The court cases and such may work on closing thstvplace as an aside.

    So, to the question,

    I’m fine with process here. The immediacy with the bill, now we can have a real discussion, to the bill, sure, and what it says, but there are realities to this, like educating the folks in the district, to looking at how the company has been a bad actor all through the process, jumping the narrative to probably help with the pending lawsuits filed or will be filed.

    My whole point is getting the best outcome, and isolating the company as the bad actor, and everyone working towards a best case, then yeah, if it can hold, let it.

    But, Durkin, the other sponsors, and including the governor’s office…

    There needs to be an organizing time, together, not a waste of time to point fingers.

    Tough to see an ending all will like or accept, but there is time for the side trying to have the best interests of Willowbrook and the victims to make clear all is being done, was done, continues to be done, especially against this bad neighbor abd actor.

  8. - Thomas Paine - Friday, Sep 6, 19 @ 3:32 pm:

    Pritzker said he would call special session if Durkin requested it.

    Has Durkin requested it?

  9. - Downstate Illinois - Friday, Sep 6, 19 @ 3:35 pm:

    NIMBYism at it’s worse. The new law set a standard. If the company can meet the standard and applicable EPA regs then let it operate. If it can’t then close it.

  10. - Michelle Flaherty - Friday, Sep 6, 19 @ 3:45 pm:

    Durkin filed a brand new, first-reading House Bill. (HB3885)
    Passing that bill in a special session would mean at least 5 special session days to meet constitutional requirements.

    Three readings over three days in the House. Send it to the Senate for first reading in a perfunctory session the same day it passes the House. You still need two additional days for second and third reading in the Senate. That’s five days worth of special sessions if you want to pass HB3885.

    And that assumes every duck is in a row and everyone’s cool with waiving all the posting notices for HB3885.

  11. - Norseman - Friday, Sep 6, 19 @ 4:03 pm:

    NO. Special sessions cost money. JB was wrong to say he’d call one. Now that Durkin took his sweet time drafting his bill, it’s close enough to Veto Session for JB to justify waiting to avoid the extra cost to the taxpayers.

    Reading the description of Durkin’s bill, I’m amused by how he continues to want to have his cake and eat it too. His first bill set tough standards to be met. Now that the company has indicated it’s willing to meet more stringent standards infuriating his constituents, Durkin drafts another bill to have the locals stop it.

  12. - Just Me - Friday, Sep 6, 19 @ 4:24 pm:

    Durkin should host his own public hearing about his legislation in his district.

  13. - Juvenal - Friday, Sep 6, 19 @ 4:29 pm:

    Pritzker should do whatever Andrea Thome asks. Full stop.

  14. - NorthsideNoMore - Friday, Sep 6, 19 @ 4:31 pm:

    Remove the emotion, look at the science, take action if needed.

  15. - The Captain - Friday, Sep 6, 19 @ 4:38 pm:

    Call a special session. 1) People’s lives are at risk and asking the legislature to consider a measure to provide for their health and safety is the right move. 2) It’s good Springfield politics, this is something he said he would do and he should honor that.

  16. - Token Conservative - Friday, Sep 6, 19 @ 4:39 pm:

    ==Remove the emotion, look at the science, take action if needed. ==

    You must be new at this.

TrackBack URI

This is not Facebook, so uncivil comments, profanity of any kind, rumors and anonymous commenters will not be tolerated and will likely result in banishment.

* Pritzker backs legislative efforts to ban flavored e-cigarettes
* Taking the long view
* Question of the day
* Without debate or specifics, Gaming Board recommends state alter Chicago casino tax structure
* "What I said is 3% compounded annually is a tough climb"
* Pigeon poops on pol's parade
* It's just a bill
* Ric Ocasek
* Looking on the bright side
* Fun with numbers
* OK, but how do you draft the law?
* State's red flag law is a "public health tool"
* "Do not assume that what you look at on the outside is what’s going on on the inside"
* Pritzker orders budget cutting scenarios
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...





Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller