Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » Careful what you wish for
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Careful what you wish for

Monday, Sep 9, 2019

* My weekly syndicated newspaper column

Rep. David McSweeney (R-Barrington Hills) announced last week that he will not seek reelection. Instead, he said he’ll likely be making a 2022 statewide bid for either US Senate against Sen. Tammy Duckworth or secretary of state if Jesse White retires.

He may not be a household name, but Rep. McSweeney has been a huge thorn in Republican leadership’s side since he first ran for the Illinois House in the 2012 primary.

He took on Rep. Kent Gaffney, who had been the House Republicans’ appropriations director for a decade and was appointed to the seat after the untimely 2011 death of Republican Rep. Mark Beaubien. McSweeney at one point during the campaign claimed House Republican staff had violated the law by doing political work on state time and tried hard to get Gaffney kicked off the ballot. He won a three-way primary and then went on to defeat Beaubien’s widow, who ran as an independent in the general election.

In other words, he did not arrive in Springfield well-liked by the people who ran his own party. And he hasn’t tried to ingratiate himself with them at any point since then.

He refused to attend House Republican caucus meetings and eventually became one of the most outspoken Republican critics of Gov. Bruce Rauner. McSweeney became a go-to person for reporters needing anti-Rauner quotes. He basically served the same purpose as former Democratic state Rep. Jack Franks, who built up his name recognition by regularly slamming Democratic governors and was beloved by political reporters and now chairs the McHenry County Board. McSweeney’s district includes part of McHenry County, and Franks and McSweeney have worked together over the years to pass various local government-related bills.

After Rauner lost, McSweeney turned his fire on his own House Republican Leader, Jim Durkin. He has called Durkin corrupt, said he was an anti-Trump “RINO” (Republican in name only) and called on him to resign. Durkin retaliated by yanking staff support on two separate occasions. McSweeney kept his name in the papers.

McSweeney is an information sponge. He is super-smart and makes it his business to constantly find out what is going on in this state’s politics and governance.

He immediately sought out many of Springfield’s old hands after taking office and pumped them for every bit of advice and insight he could get. Those relationships, combined with his outspoken critiques of his own party helped him pass a lot of bills through the Democratic-controlled House, and also probably helped keep him safe from any serious general election challenges.

Rep. McSweeney’s far northwest suburban district is somewhat odd. It was once represented by conservative firebrand and trial lawyer Al Salvi, who left to run for US Senate. Rep. Beaubien was a pro-choice liberal Republican. Gaffney was somewhat more conservative than his mentor Beaubien, but was definitely to the left of McSweeney, who is hard-right on taxation and social issues.

The 52nd District was long considered a Republican bastion, except for the usual Jesse White wins (the popular pol routinely wins most legislative districts and won every single county in 2002). Republican Mitt Romney defeated President Barack Obama by 10 points in the district during the 2012 election.

But President Donald Trump, who had problems everywhere in suburbia, only won McSweeney’s district by a mere 1.6 percentage points in 2016. And then Democratic Comptroller Susana Mendoza won it last year by 2 points. Trump isn’t doing much to improve his popularity in the suburbs, so 2020 could be even worse for Republicans in that part of the world.

McSweeney has sharply criticized Gov. JB Pritzker, so it’s possible that the Democrats might have tried to take him out if he ran again, but it seems unlikely since his dissension in the Republican ranks can be quite useful to their Statehouse purposes (every time the Democrats advanced one of McSweeney’s bills they drove the other side crazy). Even so, a warm Democratic body with little party support could’ve forced McSweeney to spend big bucks on his reelection just to be safe, and that money would be better spent on setting himself up for the 2022 statewide contest.

The House Republican operation was completely blindsided (and overjoyed) by McSweeney’s announcement, so they don’t yet have a list of possible candidates.

But McSweeney’s exit means it’s now quite possible that the district goes into play next year if the Democrats can find the right candidate. That could turn out to be McSweeney’s ultimate revenge on his party. Careful what you wish for.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - Perrid - Monday, Sep 9, 19 @ 9:50 am:

    “he hasn’t tried to ingratiate himself” lol, understatement of the year award goes to…

  2. - Oswego Willy - Monday, Sep 9, 19 @ 9:53 am:

    Great read, good accounting of McSweeney.

    To that,

    It’s what has my own issues with McSweeney. There is/was this one step, and simultaneously another that was counter intuitive to what could be a natural progression.

    McSweeney desperately wanted to be an elected. Tried running for Congress, always “hanging about” waiting until he decided that an open seat, a seat that was occupied by a moderate GOP voice that was beloved, that was his chance.

    Again, looked for advice, but also looked to fracture and stand out in the ways not the most productive to caucus or party.

    I have my own issues with Leader Durkin, but in terms of the caucus, I’ve understood where he’s been both stuck and where he needs to show his strength.

    McSweeney got a great deal thru, but McSweeney was never a statesman. A statesman can point to bringing folks of both parties together, McSweeney reveled in working with the Dems to pass his bills, but not always at times with an open heart to all colleagues.

    The best thing a Trumpkin can do is call someone a R_ _ O.

    The GOP of old that Trumpkins despise is based on this embracing what the far Right wanted in a religious-like need for politics to be pure.

    For me, the very best way to describe Mr. McSweeney?

    His twitter handle celebrates Reagan, as McSweeney is anything but someone who follows the Reagan Rule.

    That’s the ball game. That’s who he is.

    I truly like him, I think the way he sought counsel before arriving, his truth to his own beliefs and governing, I respect.

    I truly never liked how McSweeney went about his business to alienate the caucus, upstage partisanship as a way to dig at colleagues, and the religious-like parameters in defining a party, that’s also his Springfield legacy.

    As someone so wanting to wrap himself as a Reagan disciple, the warped way he chose to highlight those attributes of the Reagan Revolution by all but ignoring the Reagan Rule is one of many issues McSweeney will need to overcome to even ponder a run statewide.

    We’ll see how Trump-y McSweeney will be, while trying to embrace Reagan.

  3. - Annonin' - Monday, Sep 9, 19 @ 10:10 am:

    McSweeney had a funny interview on WGN-AM this weekend. Mooch (i.e. no who wants all the stuff but refuses to pay) admitted that this top two choices from the taxpayer funded job buffet have nothing to do with cutting prop taxes, In fact a U.S. Senate perch puts him a group that paid for a “tax cut” with $1 trillion plus in borrowing.
    Pretty fun. Maybe he’ll develop a better rant.

  4. - The Captain - Monday, Sep 9, 19 @ 10:49 am:

    You would really have to federalize this race to win the district, Casten won the IL-06 precincts in McSweeney’s district by about 3 points and Underwood did about the same in the IL-14 precincts that overlap this district. The federal trends here are in the Democrats favor.

    The problem is this is an affluent district and the item on the ballot in 2020 that will likely have the most local TV spending is on the progressive income tax. And while that tax plan doesn’t raise taxes on 97% of Illinoisans, of that 3% that will see their taxes go up a number of them live here. That may be enough of a headwind to keep this district from being competitive.

  5. - Just Me 2 - Monday, Sep 9, 19 @ 11:11 am:

    Does Gaffney still live in the District? I’ll put my walking shoes on for that guy.

  6. - Rich Miller - Monday, Sep 9, 19 @ 12:10 pm:

    ===You would really have to federalize this race to win the district===

    It’s a presidential year with a president who is spectacularly unpopular in the suburbs.

  7. - Mama - Monday, Sep 9, 19 @ 2:26 pm:

    Who would be the right person to run in Gaffney’s district for State Representative?

  8. - Ela Observer - Tuesday, Sep 10, 19 @ 1:00 am:

    Just FYI, local Democrats WERE looking for a good candidate to run even before McSweeney declined to run again. With Trump at the top of the ticket, this is the year to capture this district.

  9. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Sep 10, 19 @ 7:16 am:

    ===local Democrats WERE looking===

    But MJM wasn’t gonna touch it.

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Campaign notebook
* Federal judge rejects lawsuit over gas pump signs touting gas tax freeze
* *** UPDATED x1 *** SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition and some campaign updates
* Ken Griffin coverage roundup
* Digging into that new poll
* *** UPDATED x3 *** Pritzker to call special session on abortion rights
* Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization react
* Roe v. Wade overturned
* New law expands sports team license plate options
* Open thread
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...







Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller