Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Proft loses appeal in bid to make unlimited direct contributions with his independent expenditure PAC
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Proft loses appeal in bid to make unlimited direct contributions with his independent expenditure PAC

Monday, Dec 16, 2019 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Seventh US Circuit Court of Appeals

A provision of the Illinois Election Code limits how much money entities can contribute to political campaigns. But in some races, Illinois lifts these limits, allowing certain entities to make unlimited campaign contributions and coordinate unlimited spending with candidates. Illinois Liberty PAC, an independent expenditure committee, is not one of these entities; indeed, Illinois bans all independent expenditure committees from making campaign contributions and from coordinating spending with candidates.

Plaintiffs Dan Proft and the Illinois Liberty PAC do not attack the entire contribution and coordination ban enforced against independent expenditure committees. Rather, they seek to overturn the ban only when unlimited contributions and unlimited coordinated expenditures are allowed for others. Otherwise, plaintiffs claim, Illinois’s ban violates the First Amendment rights of free speech and free association and the Fourteenth Amendment right of equal protection.
Whether a constitutional violation exists here depends on if the contribution and coordination ban is closely drawn to prevent corruption or the appearance of corruption.

Because striking down the ban would increase the risk of corruption and circumvent other election code sections that work to prevent political corruption, we affirm the district court’s dismissal of this suit and denial of plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction.

* More specifically, this is what Proft wanted to do

Although the Illinois Election Code bars independent expenditure committees from contributing to or coordinating with candidates, Proft, through Illinois Liberty PAC, wants to make unlimited contributions directly to political candidates and coordinate with those candidates in races where the code lifts contribution caps for other entities and individuals. To do so, plaintiffs filed a complaint against the Illinois Attorney General and the members of the Illinois State Board of Elections to obtain declaratory and injunctive relief permitting such contributions and coordinated spending. Plaintiffs argue that by excluding independent expenditure committees from making these contributions and coordinated expenditures, Illinois has violated their First Amendment rights to free speech and free association and their Fourteenth Amendment rights under the Equal Protection Clause.

* Conclusion

If Proft wishes to make contributions to candidates or coordinate with candidates, he may reorganize Illinois Liberty PAC as a political action committee. And if Proft wishes to contribute to candidates, coordinate with candidates, and make independent expenditures, he may instead form a political action committee while continuing to manage Illinois Liberty PAC.

       

11 Comments
  1. - Cheryl44 - Monday, Dec 16, 19 @ 2:46 pm:

    This happens to people with their own set of facts.


  2. - Boone's is Back - Monday, Dec 16, 19 @ 2:53 pm:

    That’s one for the good guys.


  3. - walker - Monday, Dec 16, 19 @ 3:03 pm:

    Proft’s “Illinois Liberty PAC” needs to become a real PAC? Who knew? s/


  4. - 47th Ward - Monday, Dec 16, 19 @ 3:13 pm:

    My guess is he’ll appeal this ruling until he gets a better answer or until he runs out of courts.


  5. - Perrid - Monday, Dec 16, 19 @ 3:36 pm:

    Shorter: “Super PACs are not PACs, Mr. Proft.”


  6. - OpentoDiscusssion - Monday, Dec 16, 19 @ 4:15 pm:

    Political funding for candidates and other issues has grown so huge that it is repugnant. But grow it does. And with constant ways to get around existing law.

    On to SCOTUS?


  7. - Oswego Willy - Monday, Dec 16, 19 @ 4:17 pm:

    To the post,

    Here are the most important words in the conclusion;

    === …he may reorganize…===

    And…

    ===…he may instead form…===

    … and there it is.

    Proft has the relief he seeks, Proft doesn’t like the rules of those other choices to do it?

    It’s also fodder to be defeated, the happy warrior to his ilk, fighting the good fight, even if its a losing battle.

    I’m far more interested as to what, if anything, Proft thinks he can and will do for March. What does primary season look like for one Dan Proft, now that he loses this case, yet again.


  8. - Back to the Future - Monday, Dec 16, 19 @ 4:17 pm:

    Any lose in the courts by Proft is a victory for democracy.


  9. - Steve - Monday, Dec 16, 19 @ 4:34 pm:

    Who would have guessed the way the U.S. Supreme Court has come down with some decisions the last 10 years concerning free speech and campaign finance issues? Proft might be looking for a U.S. Supreme Court case on campaign finance given the composition of the court.


  10. - 19th ward guy - Monday, Dec 16, 19 @ 4:51 pm:

    Proft claims to have raised and spent $50 million in his political career. So that’s 0 for $50 million as he has never flipped a seat The bigger question will be going forward is who if anyone will throw money down that waste hole. U don’t need a federal court ruling to answer that question


  11. - Da Big Bad Wolf - Tuesday, Dec 17, 19 @ 8:52 am:

    So all Profit had to do was fill out some paperwork and use up a stamp? But he chose to go to court.
    A fool and his money.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Isabel’s afternoon briefing
* Things that make you go 'Hmm'
* Did Dan Proft’s independent expenditure PAC illegally coordinate with Bailey's campaign? The case will go before the Illinois Elections Board next week
* PJM's massive fail
* $117.7B In Economic Activity: Illinois Hospitals Are Essential To Communities And Families
* It’s just a bill
* Showcasing The Retailers Who Make Illinois Work
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today's edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Pritzker calls some of Bears proposals 'probably non-starters,' refuses to divert state dollars intended for other purposes (Updated)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller