Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » State bows to Medicaid provider’s claim of “trade secret,” refuses to release basic performance review
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
State bows to Medicaid provider’s claim of “trade secret,” refuses to release basic performance review

Wednesday, Jul 14, 2021 - Posted by Rich Miller

* BGA

The Better Government Association has filed a lawsuit in Springfield against the state’s healthcare agency after officials denied records of routine performance presentations from a top Medicaid provider.

State officials denied the request after executives of the contractor — a subsidiary of national healthcare giant Centene Corp. — said disclosure of the quarterly performance presentations they make to state officials would put the company at a competitive disadvantage.

The Centene subsidiary, Meridian Health Plan of Illinois, Inc., collected $210 million under the YouthCare contract over the last 12 months, a spokesperson for the Department of Healthcare and Family Services said on Monday.

Agency Director Theresa Eagleson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. A spokesperson said agency officials could not discuss pending litigation.

The YouthCare program provides payments for the medical and psychiatric treatment of roughly 20,200 youths who are wards of the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, as well as 15,700 former DCFS wards.

The contract has rolled out in phases as some foster parents complained they could not fill prescriptions or even schedule regular check-ups for children with serious medical conditions.

Last year, Meridian began producing for state officials quarterly slideshows with basic data about its performance in delivering care. The slides are meant to outline whether Meridian is meeting timeliness and quality standards, and what it’s doing to overcome problems.

But when the BGA asked last month to see those slideshows, state officials turned them over almost completely redacted — with entire slides blacked out.

The contractor’s performance data constituted “trade secrets,” HFS explained in its denial letter to the BGA.

Thoughts?

       

25 Comments
  1. - JS Mill - Wednesday, Jul 14, 21 @ 9:41 am:

    They should be required to turn over the slides in their entirety.


  2. - thisjustinagain - Wednesday, Jul 14, 21 @ 9:44 am:

    Completely unacceptable; the public is denied the right to directly monitor the program and contractor as a result.


  3. - Perrid - Wednesday, Jul 14, 21 @ 9:44 am:

    HFS is required to make certain information about the mcos performance public by state statute, I’d like to know what information here is so much different. The people of the state deserve, NEED, to know what is being done in their name, what is being done with their money.


  4. - ChicagoMike - Wednesday, Jul 14, 21 @ 9:50 am:

    No trade secrets when taxpayers are paying $210MM. Also performance indicators aren’t trade secrets. They’re not asking for internal strategy or the sausage making; simply what’s the value for IL in paying hundreds of millions of dollars.


  5. - Homebody - Wednesday, Jul 14, 21 @ 9:52 am:

    Something I never understood. FOIA exemption 7(1)(g) exempts “Trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person or business where the trade secrets or commercial or financial information are furnished under a claim that they are proprietary, privileged or confidential, and that disclosure of the trade secrets or commercial or financial information would cause competitive harm to the person or business, and only insofar as the claim directly applies to the records requested.”

    Sounds like the third party could slap that designation on anything it provides to a state agency, and so long as the third party makes that assertion, the exemption can apply. What prevents every contractor from putting a “TRADE SECRETS” stamp on everything?


  6. - Glenn - Wednesday, Jul 14, 21 @ 9:53 am:

    How can one not suspect that the “trade secret” is a misrepresentation of performance?

    The only thing worse than this suspicion is confirmation of the suspicion.

    This is not a good long term business plan.


  7. - Back to the Future - Wednesday, Jul 14, 21 @ 9:54 am:

    Very disappointing.
    “The contractor‘s performance data constituted “trade secrets”, HFS explained in it’s denial letter to the BGA.”
    Now that is the Team Pritzker response one would expect.
    Best of luck to the BGA to get any information that should be a routine part of being the transparent government that Pritzker campaigned on.


  8. - TinyDancer(FKASue) - Wednesday, Jul 14, 21 @ 9:58 am:

    Proprietary knowledge? Always a red flag.
    Move along. Nothing to see here.
    Yeah, right.


  9. - 100 miles west - Wednesday, Jul 14, 21 @ 9:59 am:

    Horse hockey


  10. - EssentialStateEmployeeFromChatham - Wednesday, Jul 14, 21 @ 10:05 am:

    ==What prevents every contractor from putting a “TRADE SECRETS” stamp on everything?==

    Probably no different than an attorney (maybe even a government attorney) slapping “Attorney Client Privilege” or “Attorney Work Product” on all of their files and boxes. Even on those materials that have nothing to do with litigation or client work.


  11. - Pro-Vax - Wednesday, Jul 14, 21 @ 10:05 am:

    The public data isn’t great for kids so I can only imagine what the private data looks like


  12. - Bud Keyes - Wednesday, Jul 14, 21 @ 10:07 am:

    That is a big govt contract to not know how they are performing… must be nice.


  13. - illinifan - Wednesday, Jul 14, 21 @ 10:07 am:

    If you don’t want your records public then don’t accept public money.


  14. - Rabid - Wednesday, Jul 14, 21 @ 10:23 am:

    Success, failure, must be hidden to keep contract


  15. - Excitable Boy - Wednesday, Jul 14, 21 @ 10:28 am:

    Absolute nonsense that only the most insane bureaucrat could find logical. Release the records.


  16. - Al - Wednesday, Jul 14, 21 @ 10:31 am:

    The MOB don’t like Sunshine. I encourage anyone to try to get into a Liquor Commission Compliance Hearing.


  17. - fs - Wednesday, Jul 14, 21 @ 10:55 am:

    I’ve always understood that exemption to apply to things like details of a product or service within a contract or procurement request, that may involve some intellectual property that a company keeps confidential. Applying it to how a contract is being performed (if I’m reading this right), seems like a big stretch.


  18. - Hoping for Rational Thought - Wednesday, Jul 14, 21 @ 11:21 am:

    To claim the trade secrets exemption HFS needs to provide “clear and convincing evidence” according to FOIA. Just labeling it a trade secret doesn’t pass legal muster.

    The Public Access Counselor in the Ag’S office has made this clear in binding opinions. From 14-005 and 17-003 respectively:

    14-005 -
    “Simply put, entities that contract to perform services for a
    governmental agency do not enjoy the same ability to withhold information that they do with
    respect to their private contracts.”).”

    17-003
    “Section 2. 5 of FOIA ( 5 ILCS 140/ 2. 5 ( West 2014)) correspondingly provides
    that “[ a] ll records relating to the obligation, receipt, and use of public funds of the State, units of
    local government, and school districts are public records subject to inspection and copying by the
    public.” The information at issue directly relates to the use of public funds by the District, which
    is a unit of local government.
    Therefore, even assuming, for the sake of argument, that the contracts, invoices,
    and budget documents in question constituted trade secrets or commercial or financial
    information furnished under a claim of confidentiality for purposes of section 7( 1)( g) of FOIA,
    the more specific disclosure requirements of section 2. 5 of FOIA would prevail”

    I would expect HFS to settle this rather than fight in court. Unless the MCO is paid with private money there is zero way for them to win.


  19. - Free Reign - Wednesday, Jul 14, 21 @ 11:29 am:

    These managed care groups are running over healthcare providers unchecked. Pocketing dollars that should be going toward healthcare and not delivering on the promise of coordinated care or better healthcare.

    Are they doing anything to provide better healthcare to our Medicaid population? Just sucking state Medicaid dollars off the top, and they are getting away with it.


  20. - blue line - Wednesday, Jul 14, 21 @ 12:13 pm:

    HFS is among the most well run organizations in government. it is efficient, its staff is highly professional, and its also among the most transparent agencies in all of government. their oversight of the managed care system has led to better care coordination among provides, better healthcare delivery for patients, and better overall value for the state. the contracts with the mcos are well drafted, and maintain high performance standards. all in all, just the tops in everything at HFS. /snark


  21. - Friendly Bob Adams - Wednesday, Jul 14, 21 @ 1:16 pm:

    HFS dropped the ball on this one. The methods, practices and systems of the vendor may well be trade secrets that give them a competitive advantage. They would need to prove that somehow, but it is possible.

    On the other hand, the results they produce for Illinois residents participating in their managed care program cannot be private. Numbers of people treated, numbers of claims processed and health outcomes of people served should be public information for all managed care organizations.

    The legislature and successive governors have sold Medicaid managed care as the secret to saving millions while meeting the needs of the people. Without data to support that model, it looks like a sham.


  22. - Three Dimensional Checkers - Wednesday, Jul 14, 21 @ 1:55 pm:

    It’s almost always the corporation and their Big Law attorney pressuring the government in these circumstances. I won’t hold my breath for the BGA to criticize them.


  23. - Candy Dogood - Wednesday, Jul 14, 21 @ 4:06 pm:

    This seems like the start of a pretty straight forward example of when a FOIA officer should be dismissed if they are not able to explicitly demonstrate that someone else owes full responsibility for the decision.

    But perhaps we should just beat the slow drip of facts to the punch and start suggesting that the Director should resign if this is not settled before a court ruling comes down demonstrating the agency is not operated in the interest in of the public.


  24. - Anyone Remember - Wednesday, Jul 14, 21 @ 4:39 pm:

    Been a few years since viewing a State of Illinois “Contract Template” (V.18.2 the last one seen on the EEC SPO website) but clause 4.16.1 states: “PREVAILING LAW: This contract shall be construed in accordance with and is subject to the laws and rules of the State of Illinois.”

    Yet Section 4 has 26 sections, meaning 25 are explicit statutory language included in 4.16.1. Why not another mandated statutory citation stating progress reports are not “trade secrets” ??


  25. - Marine Life - Wednesday, Jul 14, 21 @ 4:57 pm:

    Under devolution government outsourced safety net services it once directly provided. This is one of the consequences. Public interests (including transparency and our duty to care for the most vulnerable) are fundamentally incompatible with the interests of the corporations that took over the provision of so many vital services.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Showcasing The Retailers Who Make Illinois Work
* Reader comments closed for the holidays
* And the winners are…
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Update to previous editions
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* Report: Far-right Illinois billionaires may have skirted immigration rules
* Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards (Updated)
* Energy Storage Brings Cheaper Electricity, Greater Reliability
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller