Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Question of the day
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Question of the day

Friday, Jul 1, 2022

* As we discussed a few months ago, the Illinois Policy Institute has calculated the new tax cut savings at $556 per household on average, not including the six-month suspension of the increase in the Motor Fuel Tax.

But despite often referring to the institute’s numbers and analysis on the budget, or taxes, or pensions, or the Census or whatever, we have hardly seen that number mentioned in stories about this particular topic. For just one example, here’s Capitol News Illinois

Illinoisans will receive some modest tax relief starting Friday when the state’s new fiscal year begins. […]

[Republicans] also criticized some of the tax breaks as too small or for not being permanent

$556+ ain’t chump change. And for those eligible for the Earned Income Tax Credit, that relief is permanent.

* When I interviewed Gov. Pritzker yesterday, I asked whether he agreed with the IPI’s numbers…

I haven’t looked at their estimate. With doubling of the potential property tax rebate and a couple hundred, few hundred dollars that some families will get directly. And you know, the elimination of the grocery tax and the freezing of the gas tax. I haven’t done a calculation of what it would save each person. So I can’t answer that question. But, being able to send hundreds of dollars back to people at a time when they’re suffering from higher prices, is an obligation of government.

And by the way, we’re limited in doing that to what we can afford in the surpluses that we ran. And we gotta keep running those surpluses in order to be able to continue to cut people’s taxes, which is not possible unless you do what I’ve done, which is balance the budget and pay off the bills.

On the one hand, pointing to an official estimate could help dispel the widespread belief that these are barely negligible savings. On the other hand, if people don’t actually see those touted savings, they might get angry. And using IPI’s analysis might legitimatize a frequent critic.

* The Question: Should the governor run the numbers to come up with his own tax savings estimate, point to IPI’s numbers or just stay the course? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please.


- Posted by Rich Miller        

22 Comments
  1. - Amalia - Friday, Jul 1, 22 @ 11:19 am:

    I like the you wanted tax relief you got tax relief argument so use what they say they will get or just refer people via an even the IPI says there will be tax relief. you are right, it is not chump change. but do internal calculations to confirm. if less, that’s a problem, if more you can shout that down the line.


  2. - vern - Friday, Jul 1, 22 @ 11:21 am:

    I voted stay the course. Unless a benefit is actually the same dollar amount for most people (e.g. the federal stimulus payments), trying to peg it to a specific number is a distraction. Voters don’t see these issues as purely mathematical questions. Better to message along the lines of feeling their pain than wonk out on the math.


  3. - JS Mill - Friday, Jul 1, 22 @ 11:25 am:

    I don’t think using IPI’s numbers and legitimizing them for any reason is a good long-term strategy.

    I think you can develop numbers (I bet they have already) and keep them in your pocket just in case.


  4. - H-W - Friday, Jul 1, 22 @ 11:25 am:

    I voted yes. The Governor needs to do so for several reasons. One as you suggest. But more important, to say “I haven’t done the numbers” suggests that he does not know how those numbers are going to impact the budget. It looks to me like sloppy management. Pritzker wants to own the results, so he needs to own the math (first). Otherwise, he sets himself up as what Republicans like to say - a big spending, fiscally irresponsible politician.

    Run the numbers. Own them.


  5. - Lt Guv - Friday, Jul 1, 22 @ 11:28 am:

    What JS Mill said


  6. - Cool Papa Bell - Friday, Jul 1, 22 @ 11:30 am:

    Ignore the IPI and do your own calculations.


  7. - yinn - Friday, Jul 1, 22 @ 11:30 am:

    Using an official estimate that can be quoted seems like the proverbial no-brainer to me.


  8. - Rich Miller - Friday, Jul 1, 22 @ 11:35 am:

    ===how those numbers are going to impact the budget===

    They have that estimate already.


  9. - Lester Holt’s Mustache - Friday, Jul 1, 22 @ 11:38 am:

    Think I hit the wrong button, but JB should use the IPI numbers unless the official estimate is much higher. IPI has complained for years about taxation, dem fiscal policy, etc etc. Would be easy for Bailey (or national GOP, if JB does jump into prez race) to dismiss official admin numbers when touting this tax break in the future. Numbers from a decidedly conservative think tank would be much harder for opponents and PAC’s to dismiss (or flat-out lie about).


  10. - Leap Day William - Friday, Jul 1, 22 @ 11:54 am:

    == I don’t think using IPI’s numbers and legitimizing them for any reason is a good long-term strategy. ==

    Absolutely this. Give the IPI an iota of credibility and you’ll just enable them. If the government runs the numbers and it comes up the same as IPI, whatever. I do wonder what the overall hot takes be if the government calculates the numbers and it ends up being higher or lower than the IPI?


  11. - Steve - Friday, Jul 1, 22 @ 11:54 am:

    Create an official number. Why rely on anyone else?


  12. - Glengarry - Friday, Jul 1, 22 @ 11:54 am:

    It’s always best to confront IPI with the facts.


  13. - Out in Northwest Illinois - Friday, Jul 1, 22 @ 12:07 pm:

    They should generate their own estimate with income scenarios.

    I think the two “numbers” folks look at the most are what is my grocery bill and fuel bill per week or month.

    Anyone notice that natural gas per therm charges are about quadruple from last year…?


  14. - illinifan - Friday, Jul 1, 22 @ 12:08 pm:

    It is best to run your own estimate.


  15. - Donnie Elgin - Friday, Jul 1, 22 @ 12:09 pm:

    Use IPI’s 556 number - even that will be lost on most - the checks that JB will send will have a concrete impact but they are small - the grocery/gas tax relief will be imperceptible due to the tiny percent reduction and inflated prices. but this message really just needs to mature for November anyway.


  16. - 1st Ward - Friday, Jul 1, 22 @ 12:25 pm:

    The majority of this is for property taxes so if you don’t own a home you aren’t really going to receive much relief outside of a $50 check and a couple bucks a month at the grocery store. City of Chicago and Cook County homeownership rate is around 50%. If he runs ads on aggregate savings that half of Cook County isn’t eligible for that might backfire especially if gas prices move another leg higher.


  17. - Lucky Pierre - Friday, Jul 1, 22 @ 12:26 pm:

    Typical election year gimmicks

    Calling a delay of a tax hike a tax cut will fool no one and the Governor would never cite a bunch of carnival barkers numbers


  18. - From DaZoo - Friday, Jul 1, 22 @ 12:30 pm:

    Stay the course. I think the administration is still feeling the sting from Fair Tax flop which had included an effort to develop a tax savings calculator for people to use. It would be fairly easy to re-tool the calculator. But grocery and driving habits have changed wildly these past couple years for most people. I’m not sure there’s enough budget fine detail oriented people who would use it to warrant the effort.


  19. - rtov - Friday, Jul 1, 22 @ 12:47 pm:

    I think it is naïve to assume that the governor’s administration has not run its own estimates of tax savings. Creating such a plan without these estimates is nonsensical. I would not be surprised to learn that such estimates concluded the savings would be less than $556 on average, and therefore, the administration is relying IPI’s estimates. Further, I cannot agree with the conclusion that “$556 ain’t chump change.” We are talking about a “savings” of less than $50 a month…what most people would in fact consider the definition of “chump change”. Also, at the end of the day, the “savings” not actually benefit residents in that grocery and gas taxes help municipalities fund much needed infrastructure projects, which will now force municipalities to look elsewhere to raise revenue for these project or merely go without, either way residents lose.

    I hope this actually gets posted, most of my comments do not.


  20. - snowman61 - Friday, Jul 1, 22 @ 12:58 pm:

    I voted to create their own estimates as I’m sure they already have. The IPI statements are questionable passed on the past so best to either prove them wrong or show that they are right for once. Then again, maybe their numbers are higher and the state wants to keep us thinking we are better off.
    I know my savings are less but I currently rent so no Property tax relief for me.


  21. - Proud Sucker - Friday, Jul 1, 22 @ 3:42 pm:

    I’m never sure about IPI’s methodology. Calculate your own numbers.


  22. - zatoichi - Friday, Jul 1, 22 @ 4:24 pm:

    Stay the course. Get the state’s finances in as good shape as they can. Pay those state employee dental bills, make a serious hit to pension cost, get several more credit upgrades, grow that rainy day fund, do the road/infrastructure repairs/upgrades. Down turns are going to come. Be prepped then make adjustments as they are needed.


TrackBack URI

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* A quick note from Isabel Miller
* Campaign notebook
* AFSCME forces Pritzker administration to back down on Vandalia prison consolidation
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Update to today's edition
* Annual Redneck Fishing Tournament reels in 20,000 pounds of invasive species
* Bally’s files application with state to open first Chicago casino
* Caption contest!
* Pritzker unveils six-year transportation plan
* Labor-backed group's report claims Workers’ Rights Amendment would boost incomes and improve working conditions
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today's edition
* Open thread
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller