reading a story this am I’m surprised Anne P. claims not to know of certain pols attached to Madigan. If I’ve seen her at an event with yet another pol…Alderman….I think she was getting around. And knowing things.
Agreed. Im not an attorney, nor do I play one on TV, but her testimony didnt seem to end well and I was left wondering if it was a good idea to have her testify.
- Amalia - Tuesday, Apr 18, 23 @ 8:05 am:
reading a story this am I’m surprised Anne P. claims not to know of certain pols attached to Madigan. If I’ve seen her at an event with yet another pol…Alderman….I think she was getting around. And knowing things.
- Levois - Tuesday, Apr 18, 23 @ 8:44 am:
Off topic I’m laughing at the reference to Elon Musk in this post. LOL
- Lincoln Lad - Tuesday, Apr 18, 23 @ 10:29 am:
I don’t think any of the other defendants can hope to work the jury like Anne has tried to do. They wouldn’t stand a chance.
- Itsthelaw - Tuesday, Apr 18, 23 @ 1:26 pm:
AP is using the Sergeant Schultz defense: “I know nothing”. She is contradicted by the tapes and emails. We will see how it all turns out.
- low level - Tuesday, Apr 18, 23 @ 1:44 pm:
==will see how it all turns out.==.
Agreed. Im not an attorney, nor do I play one on TV, but her testimony didnt seem to end well and I was left wondering if it was a good idea to have her testify.