Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Today’s quotable: George McCaskey
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Today’s quotable: George McCaskey

Friday, Oct 11, 2024 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Colleen Kane at the Tribune

The Bears are confident in President/CEO Kevin Warren to break ground on a new stadium next year.

Warren said Wednesday the goal remains to begin construction on a $4.7 billion stadium project on Chicago’s lakefront at some point in 2025. When [Chairman George McCaskey] was asked whether he’s confident in that timeline, he said, “Yes. We’re confident in Kevin.”

But McCaskey acknowledged progress has to be made as the Bears seek public funding for nearly half of the project.

“There’s a veto session in November, there’s a lame-duck session in January and then there’s a spring session right after that,” McCaskey said. “So at some time in one of those sessions, we’re going to have to have some sort of enabling legislation to allow the project to move forward.”

Is “enabling legislation” a new way of saying “state government handout”?

       

48 Comments
  1. - Riversidian - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 10:29 am:

    I don’t see how this gets done. I can’t recall a single person at the state level who would need to vote on public funding expressing interest in doing so.


  2. - Telly - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 10:36 am:

    They own the Arlington Heights property and have a pro-stadium mayor and village board in place. They can break ground there tomorrow without enabling legislation. Nothing is stopping them except the want of a government handout.


  3. - Larry Bowa Jr. - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 10:40 am:

    It may seem hard to believe but this will only become more absurd when it ends with nothing to show for anyone but a bunch of salary and perks in Kevin Warren’s pockets.
    I struggle to understand what the McCaskeys don’t understand here. I’ve known enough born wealthy people to know that they’re no more likely to have brains than anyone else but this is getting embarrassing. Someone help them.


  4. - low level - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 10:40 am:

    == I can’t recall a single person at the state level who would need to vote on public funding expressing interest in doing so.==

    Exactly correct. Its difficult to see how they get anything from the state. They need to acknowledge that reality and move on.


  5. - Joe Bidenopolous - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 10:43 am:

    They should build a mini-stadium then invite legislators to a cruise to discuss it. That seems to be a winning strategy.


  6. - Joe Bidenopolous - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 10:44 am:

    Seriously though - who is more incompetent here, the McCaskeys or Reinsdorf?


  7. - Norseman - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 10:45 am:

    === Is “enabling legislation” a new way of saying “state government handout”? ===

    For the current push. The use of political euphemisms is a well-established technique. Some folks get really creative.


  8. - Chicagonk - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 10:47 am:

    The Bears have little leverage. That said, it’s a better use of taxpayer dollars than data centers that barely employ anyone and consume tons of water and electricity.


  9. - Save Ferris - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 10:50 am:

    “Nothing is stopping them except the want of a government handout.”

    It’s not ant, it’s need. The stadium will cost upwards of $3 billion. They are debt capped at only $750 million. They are over $2 billion short. The family has no outside source of income or wealth, so their only option would be to sell equity. They can’t do that and maintain majority control of the team.

    That is why they want to have someone else pay for it (us) and lease instead of own.


  10. - H-W - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 10:52 am:

    I suppose it is his job to say yes, “yes we are going to build on the lakefront next year.” Its sort of like Maggie Green of Georgia’s job to say “the Democrats are sending hurricanes to republican states.”

    Someone has to say these things, I suppose.


  11. - Gravitas - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 10:53 am:

    Color me skeptical.

    This is the same George McCaskey who attended the Jimmy Irsay Band concert at Navy Pier, so he is somewhat delusional and less than credible.


  12. - Telly - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 10:57 am:

    == a better use of taxpayer dollars than data centers that barely employ anyone and consume tons of water and electricity. ==

    I would agree that the economic development benefits of data centers are offset by those shortcomings, but at least they pay their fair share of property taxes — something the Bears are looking to avoid with both their stadium proposals.


  13. - Pundent - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 11:00 am:

    When an organization is addicted to government funding, the worst thing that you can do is enable them.


  14. - DuPage Saint - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 11:04 am:

    They have Mayor Johnson on board maybe they can hire Darren Bailey to swing the downstate legislature
    They need and deserve no state money. The NFL helps with financing and seems to be allowing teams to take equity partners
    Maybe Warren has pictures he doesn’t really seem to be helping the Bears just selling false hope


  15. - walker - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 11:08 am:

    State-level “enabling legislation” could also be to allow local governments to create new property tax or TIF structures, similar to the PILOT proposals.


  16. - ChicagoBars - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 11:10 am:

    I don’t think they get it done but the debt in the final years of the ISFA bonds that built Soldier Field will create real (more) fiscal problems for City Hall so assume they’ll keep pushing a new stadium bond deal so they can refi out of the looming payments that will come out of City Hall revenues.

    That’s the only angle I see left that they haven’t really played on trying to get a deal (and avoid selling some team equity).


  17. - Proud Papa Bear - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 11:12 am:

    You’ve got 446 days to get a shovel in the ground, Kevin.
    Good luck with that.


  18. - Northsider - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 11:24 am:

    Is “enabling legislation” a new way of saying “state government handout”?

    Yes. And, therefore, no.


  19. - Bigtwich - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 11:26 am:

    –Nothing is stopping them except the want of a government handout–

    That and a lake front.


  20. - Henry Francis - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 11:26 am:

    George McCaskey is a very fine and decent person.

    He has done nothing in his professional life of note that would suggest he is qualified to be Chairman of a multi-billion dollar organization. (Apparently that was his brother Mike/s)

    He’s been chairman for 12 seasons and the Bears’ record during that time is 86-120, a winning percentage of .417.

    This is a family business and will continue to be operated like a family business until George’s mom passes. Then George and his cousins can cash out.

    Any subsidy given to the team will simply add millions (on top of tens of millions of dollars) set to go to Papa Bear’s grandkids.


  21. - Huh? - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 11:38 am:

    What don’t the bears understand about the word “no”? The “n” or the “o”?


  22. - Burrito Man - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 11:56 am:

    Good luck. McCaskey is still dreaming but I don’t its gonna happen anytime soon. But starting the bulldozers soon means they have the funds to pay for it too. They just want a state refund check (in the millions) once they complete the project in 2025.


  23. - Dan Johnson - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 11:57 am:

    Hi Save Ferris (and anyone else) –

    You said It’s not ant, it’s need. The stadium will cost upwards of $3 billion. They are debt capped at only $750 million. They are over $2 billion short. The family has no outside source of income or wealth, so their only option would be to sell equity. They can’t do that and maintain majority control of the team.

    If the team is worth about $5B, then why couldn’t they raise $2B for a minority stake and maintain majority control? That, to me, is the big unanswered question.


  24. - Lincoln Lad - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 12:19 pm:

    I’m sure the unions would like to see the State help this get done, but they’ve been strangely silent. Not sure what to make of that.


  25. - Sal - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 12:21 pm:

    @Save Ferris, while you are correct that the McCaskeys are relatively cash poor compared to other NFL owners, they have already committed to raising $2.3 billion for their lakefront proposal (probably financed by a combination of selling Personal Seat Licenses, stadium naming rights, and an NFL loan.) They can now raise approximately an additional $500 million by selling 10 percent of ownership to private equity thanks to the new NFL rule. All that gets them very close to the $3 billion they need to build a subsidy-free dome in Arlington Heights. They could probably easily raise another $200 million through a partnership on the surrounding real estate development on the Arlington property.

    But they hired Kevin Warren to get a government hand out to spare them of some of that.


  26. - Frida's Boss - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 12:21 pm:

    @Dan- The Bears already have minority shareholders who have about 20% of the team. I believe they also have first rights to purchase majority stake if the Bears decide to sell. I may be misinformed on that second point.

    While the Mayor may not understand taxes, TIFs, budgets, finance, governing, or anything else, he for sure understands that losing the Bears to Arlington Heights will be his defining legacy. Imagine, on top of everything else he’s been going through, come the next election, he’ll be the Mayor who lost the Bears and possibly the Sox. That will be his footnote in the Mayoral history of Chicago Mayor’s.


  27. - Rahm's Parking Meter - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 12:27 pm:

    We are just waiting in AH. I’ll take the Bears and the Sox for all I care :)


  28. - TJ - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 12:32 pm:

    The state should give them a symbolic check for a buck fifty.


  29. - Bill W. - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 12:35 pm:

    “Enabling legislation,” does this mean Chris Welch and Don Harmon would be supporting the McCaskeys’ addiction to public funds?


  30. - Proud Papa Bear - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 12:36 pm:

    “ I’m sure the unions would like to see the State help this get done, but they’ve been strangely silent.”

    While the head of the Chicago Teachers’ Union has been strangely supportive.

    Interesting times.


  31. - Excitable Boy - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 12:50 pm:

    - They can’t do that and maintain majority control of the team. -

    Crying shame. Some folks really got it awful.


  32. - OneOpinion - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 1:04 pm:

    Is “enabling legislation” a new way of saying “state government handout”?

    No, absolutely not. It’s a “private revenue enhancement,” nothing more.


  33. - Steve Rogers - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 1:05 pm:

    Maybe the Bears should move to the Northwestern stadium that seats 12,000.


  34. - @misterjayem - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 1:17 pm:

    In all my years of knocking on the doors of Illinois voters, not once has anyone expressed the slightest interest in much less support of government funded sports stadiums.

    George’s “enabling legislation” would require “enabling legislators” and I can’t identify anyone who wants to tank their career like that.

    NOPE.

    Not One Penny, Ever.

    – MrJM


  35. - JS Mill - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 1:17 pm:

    =While the head of the Chicago Teachers’ Union has been strangely supportive.=

    If the Bears got money from the state CTU would try to use that as a political cudgel against the state.


  36. - ElTacoBandito - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 1:25 pm:

    “The State owes the City of Chicago 1.1 billion. . . and can you also give us another 2 billion because why not if your giving it out.”


  37. - Excitable Boy - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 1:27 pm:

    - not once has anyone expressed the slightest interest in much less support of government funded sports stadiums. -

    Head down to Forgottonia and hit my dad’s door. Since I was a kid he’s complained about public funding of stadiums when average people can’t afford to go to a game.

    I assure you he’ll bring it up and you’ll enjoy the conversation.


  38. - Dan Johnson - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 1:27 pm:

    Thanks Frida’s Boss - I didn’t realize there were already 20% owners. And thanks @Sal I didn’t know the NFL rule only allows for a 10% sale.


  39. - Juice - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 1:38 pm:

    My understanding was that the non-family minority owners (namely Pat Ryan) already offered to assist in financing the Bears stadium. Presumably they would have had a larger ownership stake in the stadium than they have with the team.

    But the McCaskey’s told them no. So Pat decided to build his stadium in Evanston instead.


  40. - low level - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 1:53 pm:

    ==does this mean Chris Welch and Don Harmon would be supporting the McCaskeys’ addiction to public funds?==

    Correct, it would mean that, and this is not going to happen. See how easy that was? I just made their lobbyists jobs simple.


  41. - The Magnificent Purple Walnut - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 2:05 pm:

    Henry Francis, I agree that George is a good man. As far as his qualifications, With all due respect, I would look closer at the financial bottom line over the past 12 years rather than the won lost record. “Statistica” claims they were worth 1.2 Billion in 2002 and 6.4 Billion in 2024. I’m guessing that’s a pretty successful company.


  42. - The Magnificent Purple Walnut - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 2:08 pm:

    I made a typo. That was from 2012 to 2024. Sorry.


  43. - Thomas Paine - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 2:18 pm:

    === That is why they want to have someone else pay for it (us) and lease instead of own. ===

    Part of the reason. Government-issued bonds are tax-exempt, so you get a better rate. Also, if the stadium is owned by the team, the depreciation gets recorded as a financial loss every year. A $3 billion asset depreciated on a 20 year schedule is recorded as a $150 million loss each year, which is not nothing.


  44. - Skeptic - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 2:55 pm:

    “A $3 billion asset depreciated on a 20 year schedule is recorded as a $150 million loss each year, which is not nothing.” Is that saying they want our tax money to (in part) enable them to pay less tax money? That seems like a lose-lose for us.


  45. - Candy Dogood - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 3:30 pm:

    ===The family has no outside source of income or wealth, so their only option would be to sell equity. ===

    Ah yes, the old multibillion dollar sports franchise rich, cash poor scenario.


  46. - Tim - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 3:38 pm:

    === The family has no outside source of income or wealth ===

    Maybe they should go to Vegas and put some of it on red, then. The odds might be better than the State giving them any money at all.


  47. - workingfromhome - Friday, Oct 11, 24 @ 4:16 pm:

    Love the Bears through thick and thin but I have zero interest in any of my tax dollars supporting a new stadium. Same goes for the White Sox. They have the money.


  48. - Just a guy - Friday, Oct 18, 24 @ 1:34 pm:

    I’ll keep it simple…sell the team. You have an ownership that is nowhere near, from a financial standpoint, capable of playing in the field with its competition. The NFL is a Billionaire league. Take your lottery win, split it among the heirs, and let Bezos come in and build a stadium with the money he has in his couch.


TrackBack URI

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Trump border czar pick has message for Pritzker: 'Game on'
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Update to today's edition
* Unsurprisingly, Pritzker continues to bat away presidential questions
* Republicans upset about Pritzker's 'You come for my people, you come through me' comment
* Pritzker, Welch talk Trump
* New rules (Updated)
* Madigan trial Roundup: Defense cross-examines ex-ComEd executive
* It’s just a bill
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller