This just in…
Monday, Sep 17, 2007 - Posted by Rich Miller
* 2:20 pm - Senate President Emil Jones and Senate GOP Leader Frank Watson have been in the governor’s office for the past hour and a half or so. The Senate was supposed to be in at noon today, but the session was postponed until 2 because the speakers in the chamber aren’t working properly. They’re being worked on as I write this. Don’t expect much floor action right away, if at all, today. I’m told that the two caucuses are preparing to meet soon after the session is opened to discuss today’s meeting at the guv’s office.
* 3:49 pm - Sen. Frank Watson just told reporters after leaving the guv’s office that they wasted their time.
Clarifying… I had a partial quote. Watson said if they don’t get something done soon then it’s a waste of their time.
* 5:12 pm - The governor has a new plan for the CTA. Magic money for subsidies until next June so that they can do a loophole closure bill with a simple majority after Jan. 1st.
28 Comments  
|
|
Enter your password to view comments
|
Smoking provision could halt progress
Monday, Sep 17, 2007 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The Republicans have demanded that the capital projects bill be passed before they’ll consider the RTA/CTA bailout proposal. But the capital bill is funded by a yet-to-be-determined casino expansion plan. That plan (which apparently isn’t even drafted yet, much less agreed) is facing another big obstacle…
Illinois casinos say the statewide smoking ban set to take effect January 1 will cost them about $144 million a year — about 20 percent of their annual take.
So they’re giving lawmakers the hard sell, trying to get an exemption from the ban into a casino expansion plan that the state Senate may consider this week.
* More…
Tom Swoik, executive director of the Illinois Casino Gaming Association, predicted the state would see its annual casino tax take drop 20 percent next year, or nearly $144 million, if patrons can’t smoke.
“If there is a capital bill and there is a casino expansion bill, we’d like to see that exemption put in there,” Swoik said. […]
The Illinois Senate is expected back at the Capitol today, possibly to consider adding up to three new casinos and expanding existing gambling operations to finance billions of dollars worth of construction and repairs to schools, roads and bridges.
The gambling industry sees it as an opportunity to repeal the casino portion of the ban, telling lawmakers smokers will gamble in other states and Illinois will lose millions in tax revenue at a time when it needs every cent.
Drea and other smoking opponents worry such a provision will mysteriously find its way into the fine print of a massive gambling plan with no warning and no debate. Such practices aren’t uncommon in the General Assembly, where legislation containing thousands of pages often emerges with little notice.
The bottom line is we may not see a resolution to this any time soon.
* Related stories, compiled by Paul…
* CTA riders have their doubts
* Solution for transit could run out of gas
* RTA digging itself into deeper hole
* Chicago Public Radio: Transit doomsday clock stops, bill does not
* Chicago transit riders brace for cuts, far hikes
* Disabled transit riders to feel pinch
* Courtney Greve: Pace is out of step
* Senate back in session
* Statehouse Insider: On Blagojevich actions
* State funding fray rolls to county
* Buzz about Con-Con begins
* Schoenburg: State board suggests election judges need better training
18 Comments
|
Democratic dysfunction
Monday, Sep 17, 2007 - Posted by Rich Miller
* I’ve been surprised that the national media has yet to write much about our Democratic circus here in Illinois. Dan Vock, writing for Stateline, makes a good point today in an article entitled “Democrats’ dysfunction hobbles Illinois”…
Illinois isn’t the only state in the throes of a high-stakes budget standoff. Wisconsin lawmakers are now debating whether and how to greatly expand health insurance coverage, while Michigan legislators are trying to jumpstart the state’s moribund economy at a time when revenues are falling.
But for drama, the Oscar goes to Illinois.
* He doesn’t know the half of it…
Several African-American House members are starting to worry about potential primary opponents backed by Senate President Emil Jones and Gov. Rod Blagojevich, but it’s unclear right now how many will get opponents and how involved the two leaders will be. Jones and Blagojevich have engaged in open political warfare with House Speaker Michael Madigan pretty much all year, and it looks like they may be taking another big step by attempting to take out some of Madigan’s people. […]
For many of these challengers, the big question may be whether Jones, the governor and the governor’s surrogates, particularly the Service Employees International Union, dump big bucks into their races. The governor’s campaign fund doesn’t have much money in it, but his top fundraisers are gearing up in a big way. SEIU will be making endorsements sometime in November after the petition filing deadline ends, so we’ll know more by then.
The House Democrats say they’re ready for anything. But if any of these challengers can put together a credible effort, voter anger over the botched session could make for some interesting contests.
And it will make the war between the state’s top Democrats a whole lot more intense.
* Aaron Chambers takes note of the battle in his latest column and concludes his thoughts this way…
But as Blagojevich and Jones near the end of their fifth year with real power in Springfield, they have done little to undermine Madigan’s power. Madigan has by far the most sophisticated organization in Springfield. If there is a king of Illinois Democrats, it’s Madigan.
We’ll know soon whether Blagojevich, with Jones, can sustain the cuts he made to the local grants — and knock Madigan back on his heels.
But so long as the three egos from Chicago fight for power, those who depend on state services may be the casualties of their war.
Who’s winning?
29 Comments
|
The questions pile up
Monday, Sep 17, 2007 - Posted by Rich Miller
* More trouble for Congressman Weller…
Without fanfare, the wife of Rep. Jerry Weller (R-Ill.) formed a not-for-profit corporation this summer dedicated to helping children in her native Guatemala. Her board of directors includes Weller’s mother, his brother and a New York man who has partnered with Weller to buy land in Nicaragua.
Analysts say the Zury Rios Fund, named after Weller’s wife, raises questions about whether Weller’s financial dealings overlap with his wife’s — and whether he can legally exclude her assets from his congressional financial disclosure form. […]
House rules require its members to disclose their spouses’ finances. Weller is one of two congressmen to claim a rare exemption from that requirement, because he says he has no knowledge of his wife’s finances, has not contributed to them and does not expect to benefit from them.
Disclosure experts say the existence of the non-profit and the composition of its board make the exemption “problematic” for Weller to defend.
“Problematic” is a good word.
* More from the AP…
“The fact that his family members are involved would suggest that he has a pretty good idea of what’s going on,’’ said Bill Allison, a senior fellow at the Sunlight Foundation, a government-transparency watchdog group. “Does he just discuss the weather with his family?’’
* Meanwhile Kristen McQueary tells us where Weller was when he wasn’t returning phone calls from Tribune reporters…
Here we have a powerful, veteran congressman allegedly shopping for attractive land deals while on congressional business trips, failing to reveal them on disclosure forms, and no one says a word - not even Weller, who has refused to answer questions or dispute the Tribune’s findings. He has been busy in Guatemala tending to his family and assisting on his wife’s re-election campaign. She is a Guatemalan senator, and they have a toddler.
* McQueary’s column was written before the Tribune disclosed the most recent intrigue, so she closes with this…
Whatever Weller’s faults, the fact remains that he’s smart. He’s a hustler. He will do the rounds in his district shortly before the election, remind voters of his accomplishments and explain the alleged discrepancies on his asset disclosure forms to a degree that satisfies voters and most editorial boards.
At worst, he failed to meet House requirements for disclosure. At best, the issue will be far from the Tribune’s front page come November 2008. That photo of the surf and sand will sit in the newspaper’s archives as a dusty reminder of another Weller political snafu diverted. Case closed.
That analysis assumes there are no further revelations. But she’s right that this race is low on the Democratic totem pole, and we don’t know yet whether Weller’s Democratic foe can put together any sort of real campaign.
Still, the longer Weller refuses to answer questions about his wife’s finances, the more coverage he’ll get when he is finally cornered. It won’t be pretty.
Weller most certainly is a fantastic campaigner. But he has more than enough baggage to make this a race if the Dems have the cash and his opponent (who was once a Republican) is at all credible.
* More congressional stuff, compiled by Paul…
* Republican finds his Democratic side in attempt to defeat Weller
* Schoenburg: Fresh face Giger wants to replace LaHood
* On the heels of House success, sugar farmers look to Senate
22 Comments
|
Tony Peraica blasted out this e-mail yesterday…
Dear Friends:
In recent days, you may have read some troubling stories in the newspaper about harassing phone calls made to Cook County Commissioner Liz Gorman by an individual who formerly volunteered on our Cook County Board President campaign.
It’s important that you know the full story - and hear the facts from me.
First, this individual has had a troubled past, and I once represented him in my capacity as an attorney. Afterward, he committed to cleaning up his act. I believe in second chances, so when he asked to volunteer on our campaign, I allowed him to do so. We paid him a small twice-monthly stipend as reimbursement for his mileage. In October of 2006, he was unable to control his behavior and we required him to leave our campaign.
In February 2007 - long after he was a volunteer with our campaign - this individual was working with another Republican organization. During that time, he made harassing phone calls to Cook County Commissioner Liz Gorman.
Let me be clear - these actions were reprehensible. This individual made these calls without my knowledge or approval.
Ms. Gorman, who has long been an ally of the Cook County Democratic Machine, knows I had nothing to do with this individual’s actions - yet she has sought to blame his actions on me.
Why has she gone public with this issue seven months after this individual made the phone calls? Why is she falsely accusing me of having anything to do with this situation? Is an employer to be held responsible for the actions of a former employee (or, in this case, a volunteer)?
The answer to the above questions is simple: the Democrats are fearful of our campaign for reform. They know that we are a real threat to win the State’s Attorney’s office and restore accountability to the top law enforcement office in the county. Because of this fear, they have enlisted the help of their ally, Liz Gorman, to smear and attack me.
The record of Liz Gorman speaks for itself. She has proven herself to be a committed ally of the Democrats - a close associate of indicted political insider Ed Vrdolyak and the disgraced Shaw brothers.
Gorman also has been a staunch ally of Todd Stroger - recruiting Stroger’s former spokesperson, Sean Howard (who was arrested last year for harassing a woman) to join her public relations team at the Cook County GOP. She supported Todd Stroger’s disastrous budget. She has supported the Stroger position against numerous and even bi-partisan reform efforts. She has gone out of her way to oust good Republicans from Cook County GOP committeeman positions - in favor of Democrat shills that will toe her “party line.”
Liz Gorman’s motives are clear: she is smearing me now to provide herself a reason to slate a primary opponent against me for State’s Attorney. Rest assured that any Liz Gorman-backed candidate will be an enemy of reform, and a friend of the corrupt, Democratic machine.
There is a long road ahead before Election Day in November of 2008. The Democrats and Gorman allies will spend the next 13-plus months slinging mud at us … because they fear us. And fear us they should - because our campaign for honest reform will win and put them out of business.
We will not be bowed. We, and now you, know the truth, and we will continue our campaign for honest reform.
I appreciate your continued support. Together, we will reform Cook County.
Sincerely,
Tony Peraica
It’s nice that Peraica has finally distanced himself from Fred Ichniowski, but since my column appeared about the Peraica situation, I’ve received some calls about other alleged strong-arm tactics from Peraica’s campaign and at least one more nasty phone call allegedly from Ichniowski to a different committeeman. Perhaps we’ll be seeing more about this soon.
Also, to the heart of the matter, it wasn’t Liz Gorman who blamed Peraica. Fred Ichniowski told the cops after he was busted that Peraica had encouraged volunteers to call Gorman’s office.
Meanwhile, House GOP Leader Tom Cross was at a Downstate function over the weekend and talked about Demcratic disunity, but added…
Cross encouraged Republicans to seize the chance to work together as a party among all the squabbling. He said the keys to success will be repairing the GOP image, team building and encouraging the involvement of young people in government to lead the future.
“We fight too much. We fight among ourselves too much. We can’t give up,” Cross said.
Thoughts?
59 Comments
|
Morning shorts
Monday, Sep 17, 2007 - Posted by Paul Richardson
* Appeal like Ryan’s nixed in other case
* Proposal to limit municipal primaries faces opposition
* Sun-Times Editorial: CeaseFire needs outside help to continue vital work
* Editorial: CeaseFire money must be restored in state budget
* If you’re slated, you’re in
* Giuliani steps up effort in Illinois
* Mary Schmich: Story behind suicide can’t be pried open
* Take hospital oversight from Stroger: panel
* Stroger, allies pound Claypool aide
It could have been a masterful political coup.
Cook County Board President Todd Stroger recently tried to hire the top aide to one of his top agitators.
But ever since Doug Kucia, chief of staff to Commissioner Forrest Claypool, turned down what he said was a $115,000 offer to work for Stroger, Stroger and board allies have been publicly pounding the $90,000 Claypool pays him.
* I-70 bridge over Mississippi River talks revived
* AG Madigan sues mortgage rescue company for fraud
* Illiniois crime drops again, but murders, robberies climb
* Illinois sex offenders at large?
* Did Poshard prod friend to sway vote on resignation?
* City incentives help firms hire hard-to-employ
* Sun-Times Editorial: Weeding out bad teachers, contract contains good things for students
* Aurora’s Planned Parenthood showdown continues; more here and here
* Southern Illinois mayors prove age doesn’t mean a thing
11 Comments
|
|
Comments Off
|
|
Enter your password to view comments
|
Question of the day
Friday, Sep 14, 2007 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The setup…
Charles Reeves’ pants fall past his hips, even with a belt. He wraps a rubber band around the cuffs so the hem of his jeans won’t scrape the ground. The 18-year-old Danville High School student layers his jeans over a pair of basketball shorts.
“It’s not as comfortable on my waist,” Reeves said of the style that he, like so many students, sports around campus.
This baggy style, however, is one that Ward 1 Alderman Tommie Reed wants to see banned under a citywide ordinance.
“I know it’s a fad … but it’s gone too far,” Reed said.
Over the past few months, Reed has repeatedly asked city council members to consider his suggestion. He called the popular style “indecent,” saying that people shouldn’t be allowed to show their underclothes.
* Apparently, this idea is all the rage in Louisiana…
Hike up those pants. Droopy drawers that bare skin or underwear might soon be forbidden fashion on the streets of several cities, and violators could be forced to part with some cash.
“I’m tired (of) looking at behinds,” Shreveport, Louisiana, Councilwoman Joyce Bowman said after Tuesday’s 4-3 vote to ban fanny-flaunting trousers.
Nobody can be arrested just for violating the ordinance, but they could be fined or required to perform community service. The maximum fine for a first offense is $100.
The city council in another Louisiana city, Alexandria, voted unanimously Tuesday to ban the baring. Its ordinance allows some sag, but 3 inches or more can bring a fine of $25 to $200 and a requirement for community service.
If the mayors of Shreveport and Alexandria sign the ordinances, they will bring Louisiana’s total to at least six, with at least two more cities considering bans.
Question: Do you think the government - any government - should have the right to tell people how to wear their pants in public?
Have a little fun with this one. It’s Friday, after all. Maybe you can suggest other ordinances for Ald. Reed.
58 Comments
|
New spin and the bright, shiny ball
Friday, Sep 14, 2007 - Posted by Rich Miller
* There’s new spin afoot. After an intense hearing on the governor’s budget vetoes in Pekin last night, the spokesman for the governor’s budget office, Justin Dejong, had this to say [emphasis added]…
“The gross exaggeration of those vetoes made (Thursday) only serves to distract the public from the fact that (Illinois House) Speaker (Mike) Madigan and the House didn’t include enough revenues to pay for the projects they inserted into the budget at the last minute without any public discourse or hearings.”
Justin ol’ pal, if there wasn’t enough money in the budget to pay for those projects, then why did Gov. Blagojevich promise an almost dollar-for-dollar replacement of those “pork” projects with his health care projects?
You can’t say on the one hand that there isn’t enough money while saying on the other hand that you’ll spend all that allegedly nonexistent money on something else. It’s absolutely inexcusable that the Peoria Journal-Star didn’t call him out on that point.
Also, Justin, there were, indeed, public hearings in both the House and the Senate on that budget proposal.
* Meanwhile, the bright, shiny ball of gaming expansion has once again reared its head…
State Rep. Jay Hoffman, D-Collinsville, introduced a $24 billion program to upgrade Illinois bridges, roads and schools and expand gaming during a press conference Thursday… Hoffman said he planned to introduce the bill authorizing the capital program into the House on Monday. He said he expected Emil Jones, the Senate president, to bring the matter up when the statehouse veto session begins during the first week of October.
Gov. Rod Blagojevich supports Hoffman’s capital projects proposal, according to Rebecca Rausch, a spokeswoman for the governor.
One of the program’s top aims is to “make sure what happened in Minnesota does not become a reality here in Illinois,” Hoffman said, alluding to the Aug. 1 collapse of an interstate bridge in Minneapolis that killed 13 motorists
Two new casino licenses would be created, bringing to 12 the total number allowed under state law. Meanwhile, the number of gaming positions — most likely slot and video poker machines — authorized per casino would jump from the current 1,200 to at least 2,000.
If passed into law, Hoffman’s capital program would more than double the number of betting devices allowed in Illinois casinos — from the 9,600 housed at nine venues, to 24,000 if a 10th license is awarded; though authorized, it’s been tied up in litigation for years — plus the two new casino licenses envisioned by Hoffman.
Using the tragic bridge collapse in Minnesota to sell a casino expansion seems a bit much, if you ask me.
* More budget stories, compiled by Paul…
* Governor yanks money for death-penalty panel
* Lawmakers begin fighting budget cuts
* Area mayors concerned with budget cuts
* Legislators, agencies speak out about Gov’s cuts
* Editorial: Reveling in road repair
7 Comments
|
* The RTA board has to formally accept the governor’s offer to help mass transit avert its “doomsday” scenario on Sunday. According to RTA Board Chairman Jim Reilly, today’s vote will be tight…
“I think the vote will be close. There will be strong arguments on both sides, but I wouldn’t presume that the board will approve [the proposal],” Reilly said.
* The Daily Herald lays out the situation…
Four “no” votes on the 12-member RTA board would be enough to reject the governor’s temporary relief offer. Norris, who represents the collar counties, and William Coulson, who represents suburban Cook County, are leaning toward opposing the plan. Judy Baar Topinka, the state’s former treasurer, says she will vote against it.
On the other side, Chicago Mayor Richard Daley supports the deal. He has three board appointees. CTA chairwoman Carole Brown is also expected to vote for it.
Pat Durante, the Addison Township GOP honcho, also sits on the RTA board. I tried calling him this morning but wasn’t able to get through.
* Both the Tribune and the Daily Herald editorialized against accepting the governor’s offer, which could influence the suburban RTA members.
Tribune…
So the governor’s offer is tempting. But the responsible answer for the RTA is to say no. Fronting next year’s money to the CTA now would be irresponsible. […]
The governor is asking the RTA to gamble that lawmakers can pass a transit bill before November. But don’t count on him to lift a finger to help. Remember, Blagojevich and the legislative leaders have known this moment was coming for 11 months but haven’t resolved it in all that time.
Daily Herald…
There’s no pleasure in recommending, as we do here, that the RTA board vote “no” today on a bailout offer from Gov. Rod Blagojevich to avoid a Chicago-area transit crisis. […]
…the governor’s offer, well-meaning though it is, fails to solve fundamental transit problems and actually could make matters worse within a few months.
* We’ve had so many discussions about mass transit lately, so let’s make this topic the center of our discussion today if we can. What do you think the RTA Board should do?
* More stories, compiled by Paul…
* Chicago CarLess: Blago blinks, Madigan shrinks, but method stinks
* Daley: CTA bailout worth the gamble
* Sun-Times Editorial: Tiny sales tax increase could make the difference
* Lawmakers prefer lasting solution to transit crisis
* Chicago Public Radio: Why my bus?
* CTA cuts could hammer temp, low income workers
* MarySue Barrett: CTA woes affect all of us
* RTA vote will mean either relief or doomsday
* Change of Subject: Gov. Wimpy will gladly pay us Tuesday for a transit bailout today
* CTA Tattler: Blago bribes RTA with immediate funding
* Chicago Public Radio: Transit vote could delay fare hikes
* Chicago transit crisis raises tricky issues for state officials
* Thousands face longer commutes, higher fares, crowded buses
* Daley: Criticism in Blue Line crash a ‘disgrace’
* Daley calls 2006 CTA accident a ‘disgrace’
*** UPDATE *** They took the cash…
During a morning meeting, the Regional Transportation Authority voted 10-2 to accept the state’s bailout plan of the mass transit system. That will postpone the Chicago Transit Authority’s plans to cut 39 bus routes and raise fares by up to $1.
*** UPDATE 2 *** The Sun-Times has the roll call…
Judy Baar Topinka and Bill Coulson voted against it.
42 Comments
|
A disturbing pattern
Friday, Sep 14, 2007 - Posted by Rich Miller
I know we had a long discussion on this topic yesterday, but since I chose it as my Sun-Times column we’ll have to do it again…
What do you do with a guy after he’s arrested for slashing tires on cars owned by a bunch of Catholic nuns?
Why, you put him on your campaign payroll, of course.
And what do you do if the same guy also has a prior conviction for telephone harassment and apparently likes to get drunk early in the morning?
Well, it’s only obvious that you’d “encourage” him to call a political opponent to “urge” her to cooperate with you.
Not a good idea, you say? Pretty stupid? Downright idiotic, even?
Meet Tony Peraica.
As the Sun-Times’ Steve Patterson reported this week, Peraica brought Fred Ichniowski onto his campaign staff after his law firm represented Ichniowski in the nun tire-slashing case. Lately, Ichniowski has allegedly been making very nasty, harassing phone calls to Cook County Commissioner Liz Gorman, who has been on the outs with fellow commissioner Peraica for months. Ichniowski told the coppers that Peraica had encouraged his supporters to call Gorman’s office and admitted that he was drunk when he phoned Gorman at 9 a.m. one day.
Go read the whole thing before commenting, please, because the analysis is further down.
Also, there’s a mistake on the CS-T website. The last line in the online version of the column (as of this morning), “Peraica has proved to be his own worst enemy,” is a stray that somehow migrated from the middle of the column to the end.
34 Comments
|
|
Comments Off
|
Morning shorts
Friday, Sep 14, 2007 - Posted by Paul Richardson
* Tribune Editorial: Orlando Jones, insider and builder
* Stroger godson wielded power behind the scenes
* Former Cook Co. official found dead in Michigan
* Suicide seen in death of Stroger’s godson
* Michael Sneed: On Orlando Jones
* Mark Pera: I’m taking on a “Bush Dog” Democrat
* Peoria businessman seeks LaHood’s seat
* McConoughey says campaigning will start early
* Kane Co. Board member to switch to the Democratic Party
* Jake Parillo: New DuPage Co. website couldn’t be worse
* Timothy McNulty: Stirring emotions, striving for reason
On Wednesday, the liberal group Media Matters for America issued a study that claims the op-ed pages of the nearly 1,430 daily English-language newspapers in the United States are dominated by conservative syndicated columnists. George Will led that group both in the number of newspapers where his column appears and their combined circulation.
Some readers, a much smaller number, tell me they think the Tribune has a liberal bent in its Commentary page. They cite weekly syndicated columnists Garrison Keillor and Leonard Pitts and Tribune columnist Clarence Page, whose column appears twice a week.
* Pat Gauen: In politics, hypocrisy stands as capital offense
Poshard, who looks like central casting’s idea of a preacher, is not in fact preachy. That may help him. He was so popular in Southern Illinois that when redistricting melded two House seats into one, he defeated his primary opponent (both were incumbents) who outspent him about 7-1.
To stay within his means, Poshard lived in his office in Washington (yes, literally). If I recall him having any brush with hypocrisy, it was in his refusal to accept PAC contributions. Detractors pointed out that he made that high-minded decision only after the first time he got elected.
* Editorial: Mulligans in academia, on Poshard situation
* Lakin family loses appeal over suit
* Chicago among 7 to officially file for 2016 Olympic bid
* Aurora abortion fight goes to court; more here
Gemini Office Development LLC applied for the permits, not revealing until recently that Planned Parenthood would operate the clinic.
“It is time to put our patients before politics,” Trombley said, noting 13 appointments already have been scheduled for Tuesday, the planned opening day of the $7.5 million, 22,000-square-foot medical facility at 3051 E. New York St. on Aurora’s east side. The clinic, one of the group’s largest in the country, will offer an array of reproductive health-care services, including abortions.
* Editorial: Can we get ‘too tough’ on sex offenders
* Future of LDC site remains in question
* State to block pushing alcopops to kids
“I think this is an important step in our struggles to reduce teen drinking,” said Sen. Carol Ronen (D-Chicago), the bill’s author. “I’m very, very concerned about the way some in the liquor industry have been promoting alcopops to young people, particularly young girls.”
The bill says there can be no cartoons or youth-oriented photos in the ads and no billboards within 500 feet of schools, public parks, amusement parks and places of worship. Violating the ban would come at a $500 cost to first-time offenders and would be doubled for a second offense.
* State must refile lawsuit alleging MRI scam
* Vote in RedEye’s ‘top party school’ tournament: Many Big Ten universities are competing
* Friday Beer Blogging: Cake edition
8 Comments
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...
 
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
   
|
Hosted by MCS |
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax |
Advertise Here |
Mobile Version |
Contact Rich Miller
|
