* I’m not generally a big fan of creating new laws designed to address a once in a millennia event. But, you had to figure that this was going to happen…
Illinois lawmakers have joined a growing stampede to tighten state laws for parents who fail to report missing children.
At least three legislative measures introduced in the Capitol in recent days are part of a national reaction to the high-profile acquittal of Casey Anthony in connection with the death of her daughter, Caylee.
“There is a groundswell of anger over the tragedy,” said state Rep. David Leitch, R-Peoria, who said his office received 400 emails calling for action after Anthony was set free.
Illinois joins Nebraska, Florida, Maryland, New Hampshire, Wisconsin and Ohio in looking for a legal way to punish parents who fail to report a missing child within a reasonable amount of time.
Creates the offense of failure to report the disappearance of a child to a law enforcement agency. Provides that a person commits the offense when he or she, as a parent, guardian, or other person having physical custody or control of a child under 13 years of age, willfully or by culpable negligence fails to make contact with or otherwise verify the whereabouts and safety of that child for a period of 24 hours and to immediately report the child as missing to a law enforcement agency after this 24-hour period expires without contact. Provides that a violation is a Class 4 felony.
Creates the offense of failure to report the death of a child. Provides that a person commits the offense when he or she, as a parent, guardian, or other person having physical custody or control of a child under 18 years of age reasonably believes that the child has died and fails within one hour of forming that reasonable belief, or as soon thereafter as reasonably practicable if compliance within one hour is impracticable, to: (1) notify a law enforcement agency of the child’s apparent death and the location of the child; or (2) seek medical attention on the child’s behalf. Provides that failure to report the death of a child is a Class 4 felony.
* HB3801, sponsored by Democrats, contains everything in both the above bills, but adds an exemption…
Provides that a person does not violate this provision when he or she fails to report due to an act of God, act of war, or inability of a law enforcement agency to receive a report of a child’s death or the location of a child’s corpse.
* The Question: On a scale of one to ten, with one being the worst and ten being the best, how would you rate Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s job performance since his inauguration? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please.
* Late yesterday, I linked this story from the Sun-Times…
Speculation is that, if S&P downgrades the 50 states’ ratings, Illinois overall rating would drop to A2-Minus, which could mean a one-half of 1 percentage point increase in interest rate payments on future bond issues. For a $2 billion to $3 billion capital plan bond issue such as the state is planning this fall, such an increase would cost hundreds of millions more in interest.
Having to pay higher interest rates on future state bond issues – possibly ½ of 1 percent — is a possibility, said Kelly Kraft, spokeswoman for Gov. Pat Quinn’s Office of Management and Budget.
“However, at this time Illinois has not been downgraded, and we are not issuing bonds until September, which allows the market to digest the situation,” Kraft said in a statement. “If we were downgraded as a result of S&P’s downgrade of federal debt, the other 49 states would be downgraded as well. Therefore, until S&P indicates how states will be affected, offering more specifics on the ripple effect would not be prudent.”
Kraft said the state expects to issue $2 billion to $3 billion in general obligation bonds in September.
Scott Pattison, executive director of the National Association of State Budget Officers, said he had been talking with state financial officers throughout the day Monday and there was no consensus about how the S&P action would affect states.
A state’s reliance on federal assistance “would be a factor to consider” for a rating agency, but Pattison said some states might be able to offset those concerns by showing they have a strong rainy day fund or have been willing to make spending cuts to keep their budgets in line with dwindling tax revenue.
“The downgrade is certainly not good news. But on the other hand, we’re really uncertain at this moment as to the direct effect, whether it will have a direct effect or not,” Pattison said. “I think it’s going to be a case-by-case basis.”
* But, as subscribers know, S&P offered up a bit of clarity late last night…
While the worldwide markets continue to decline in a vortex, Standard & Poor’s offers a nugget of good news for U.S. states and municipalities.
Despite S&P’s August 5 downgrade of the long-term U.S. sovereign debt, some state and local governments will maintain or even achieve AAA ratings, according to Standard & Poor’s. That’s in contrast to a slew of entities and companies, including Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, several private insurers, such as New York Life and Northwestern Mutual, who were downgraded Monday in the aftermath of the government downgrade.
A S&P press release cites a report, “State And Local Government Ratings Are Not Directly Constrained By That Of The U.S. Sovereign,” which explains the factors that allow for this situation to occasionally occur.
“The report notes that many U.S. state and local governments function with a high level of revenue, treasury, finance, and debt management independence compared to their global counterparts,” the press release stated.
The report said much more than that, and some of it certainly applied to states like Illinois which don’t have AAA ratings, but you’ll have to subscribe to find out what that was.
* The biggest problem, however, is not so much the impact of the S&P federal rating on Illinois, but what happens with the economy. And the future ain’t too bright right now…
But the bigger cloud hanging over the municipal bond market is the prospect of evaporating federal support to states and cities at a time when another economic swoon is possible, observers say.
In the current political climate, observers say states cannot count on another stimulus package, for instance, if tax receipts begin to plummet again. For fiscally wobbly states, such as Illinois, a deepening squeeze can translate into higher borrowing costs.
“The market is worried about whether the economy will slip into another recession in 2012,” said bond expert Richard Ciccarone, managing director at McDonnell Investment Management LLC. “That is causing some skittishness, more so than the rating downgrade.”
What we’ve got is a real conundrum, caused mainly by national partisan politics. The economists and business types I’ve been reading are saying that we need a short term stimulus to keep the country on track and long term cuts to prevent real problems down the road. This is from Terry Belton, the head of fixed income strategy for JP Morgan Chase…
“I think, on the fiscal side, what we need — and we have sort of missed the boat here — a little bit of the opposite of what we got. We need long-term reform. We need to deal with entitlements reform and tax reform. That lowers the deficit in the long run. But we actually need stimulus now.
“We’re almost getting the opposite. Coming in to next year, we’re going to have quite a fiscal drag kick in as the 2011 tax cuts run off. That’s going to hurt growth a lot next year.”
What Belton (and loads of other like-minded folks) said makes a lot of sense, but it’s not easily sold in the excruciatingly loud and divisive DC echo chamber. “You want to spend more and cut more? Ridiculous!” Also, try cutting the long term growth of Medicare and see how far that gets you in politics. It ain’t just liberals who will beat you over the head.
* And now a warning: Do not drag your goofy DC talking points into the comment section. I will not be kind to mindless rehashing.
* Related…
* Durbin struggles to find bipartisan solution to financial crisis
* VIDEO: Dick Durbin Refuses to Play the Blame Game - The senior senator from Illinois wouldn’t fault either party directly for the credit downgrade.
* IL lawmakers react to nation’s credit downgrade: “The one that I would blame is Standard & Poor. I think it’s a political ploy by them. They didn’t recognize the crisis that we had with the mortgage bank securities. I think they’re making up for that,” Biggert said.
* Finally, somebody in the mainstream media caught on to some of the crazier hype about the gaming expansion bill. Kristen McQueary at the Chicago News Cooperative decided to take a look at what the bill actually says and then compared it to the fear-mongering…
Former Chicago Police Supt. Jody Weis joined the chorus of opposition to the state’s gambling expansion bill last week, warning that if it is implemented, “political corruption and crime syndicate infiltration will follow.”
Yet the concerns of Weis and other critics are largely addressed in the actual text of the legislation, a Chicago News Cooperative analysis of claims about the 400-page bill found.
Weis, who is now deputy director of the Chicago Crime Commission, called the bill “critically flawed due to lack of regulatory safeguards” and said it was “beyond my comprehension how the Illinois legislature passed this bill.” Chicago Crime Commission Executive Vice President Art Bilek said the bill is a “quagmire of gambling sinkholes and hidden reductions of regulatory control.” Members of the mob would be “standing in line” to apply for licenses, he warned.
Jaffe has said the separate oversight creates a dangerous situation by dividing regulatory authority.
But the bill calls for the following checks and balances:
* The five Chicago Casino Development Board members who would oversee development of a casino would be subject to background checks and approval by the Illinois Gaming Board. They could be removed at any time by the mayor or the gaming board if they failed to execute their duties appropriately. Strict rules require them to report any communication between themselves and any entity that could be construed as a conflict of interest.
* An executive director overseeing the Chicago casino would undergo background checks and also must be approved by the Illinois Gaming Board.
Former state Rep. Robert Molaro is facing an investigation into legislative scholarships he awarded to a longtime supporter’s family following a Tribune report on how he doled out the publicly funded tuition waivers.
Newly released records and interviews reveal a federal grand jury has subpoenaed the Illinois State Board of Education and at least one university for documents related to scholarships Molaro awarded to Phillip Bruno’s four children.
The newspaper reported last year that Bruno’s family members had more than $94,000 in college tuition waived in recent years despite questions about the children’s eligibility.
The controversial scholarships came with just one legal requirement: that the students lived in Molaro’s Southwest Side district. The Bruno siblings signed notarized documents stating they resided within the representative’s boundaries, while other public records — including the addresses registered with their universities — indicated they lived with their mother in Oak Lawn, outside Molaro’s district. Their father didn’t live in the district either.
* Other stuff…
* Hundreds of cops could be punished for not filing ethics statements: sources
* Peoria newspaper columnist Phil Luciano is bummed out that Illinois has no state rock song. Luciano is planning to meet with the governor this week to talk about this hole in our state soul…
I floated this idea by Gov. Pat Quinn’s people Monday. Turns out he’ll be in Peoria later this week. And he is to meet with me to talk about the official state rock song.
Yes, I’m serious. Call it The Rock Summit.
After running through several Illinois bands, Luciano chose “Surrender” by Rockfordians Cheap Trick…
Frantic drums intro and then support whamming guitar chords. And the melody urgently bangs away, start to finish.
You can analyze the teen-angst references that wrestle throughout: mommy, daddy, Kiss, sex, drugs. But two lines resonate: “Surrender, surrender, but don’t give yourself away” - as in (sort of, at any age), bend but don’t break; and “We’re all all right,” a delightful chant, especially in concert.
The song is as playful as it is powerful, just as much now as in 1978. It stands the test of time: I mean, do you turn this off when it comes on the radio?
The desecrated Grant Park looks like a rock ‘n’ roll battlefield — the fields are muddy and bare, waste is strewn about and a stench of stagnant water and stale beer lingers in the air.
With Sunday thunderstorms flooding the last day of Lollapalooza, it will be weeks — and tens of thousands of dollars — before the aftermath of the festival is repaired, officials said.
“This is probably one of the worst [aftermaths],” said Bob O’Neill, president of the Grant Park Conservancy. “The turf damage is substantial, bushes were trampled … there’s a little bit of damage to some gardens.”
Last year, the restoration process cost more than $200,000. This year, repairing Hutchinson Field alone, where the Foo Fighters played Sunday night, could cost up to $80,000, O’Neill said.
* I try to ignore national politics no matter what, but this is a fascinating story…
Benchmark 10-year Treasury note yields fell to their lowest levels since February 2009 on Monday, after a U.S. credit dowgrade sparked broad risk aversion and added to the appeal of U.S. government debt.
The notes rose more than 2 points in price, with yields falling as low as 2.33 percent, the lowest rate in 2 1/2 years.
Translation: S&P downgraded US government debt on Friday. Supposedly in reaction, the stock market fell hard on Monday and spooked investors rushed to put their money in… US government debt.
Maybe Illinois should ask S&P to downgrade its bonds again. Just kidding… kinda.
The state of Illinois has not yet been told of any change in its rating, said Kelly Kraft, Gov. Quinn’s budget spokeswoman. Illinois’ current rating from S&P is an A-Plus with a negative outlook.
Speculation is that, if S&P downgrades the 50 states’ ratings, Illinois overall rating would drop to A2-Minus, which could mean a one-half of 1 percentage point increase in interest rate payments on future bond issues. For a $2 billion to $3 billion capital plan bond issue such as the state is planning this fall, such an increase would cost hundreds of millions more in interest.
* The horse racing industry has wanted slots at tracks for a very long time, so Jim Edgar’s involvement isn’t really much of a surprise…
Gov. Pat Quinn was lobbied Friday by a man who once walked in his shoes.
Former Gov. Jim Edgar, an avowed horseman, was among a group of horse racing officials urging Quinn to sign a massive expansion of gambling.
Edgar couldn’t be reached for comment after the meeting, but a Quinn spokeswoman said the message from Edgar and the others was clear.
“It was a group of proponents of the bill,” said Brooke Anderson.
* Totally unsurprising. From a press release…
Former State Representative and current Black Hawk College Trustee Mike Boland will make his official announcement of his campaign for election to Congress from the 17th Congressional District of Illinois. Boland will cite his lifetime of service to the people of Illinois and promote solutions to the issues facing our nation and specifically the needs of our region of Illinois.
* The headline is surprising, “ComEd: Smart meters could save customers nearly $3 billion,” but the story shows what an unsurprising exaggeration the claim really is…
Commonwealth Edison says customers could save $2.8 billion over 20 years if the utility installs “smart meters” that use digital technology to give homeowners details about their electric use and pricing, a study it commissioned shows. [Emphasis added for obvious reasons.]
* And while this may surprise some of you, it didn’t surprise me…
As the chart below demonstrates, the sharp decline over the past 40 years in the percentage of workers organized in unions has been associated with an equally sharp drop in the share of the nation’s income going to the middle class — those in the second, third and forth income quintiles
The chart…
* Roundup…
* ADDED: IRS: Nearly 1,500 millionaires paid no federal income tax in 2009
* Attorney general ordered to pay legal fees in FOIA lawsuit
* Illinois proves an amendment doesn’t guarantee balanced budget
* Power-Upgrade Plans Spark Illinois Storm - State Leaders, Consumer Advocates Say Proposed Changes to Prevent Outages Would Be Too Lucrative for Two Utilities
* On Friday, I asked you to rate Gov. Pat Quinn’s job performance on a scale of 1 to ten, with 1 being the worst and ten the best. He didn’t do too well.
Today, how about we rate House Speaker Michael Madigan’s job performance this year? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please.
* My weekly syndicated newspaper column is about redistricting…
Redistricting is a time for stock-taking; for looking back and looking ahead.
State legislators who’ve been around a while are suddenly faced with the often stark reality of signing on for another ten years. They add a decade to their current age and wonder if they want to be in the game that much longer.
Some decide to stick with it for just one more election so they can make extra sure their party holds their seat.
Some decide to retire right away, figuring their party has drawn the map solidly enough to ensure a suitable replacement.
Legislators in the minority party are far more likely to be mapped in with fellow party members and then discover that they don’t want to face the prospect of running in a primary, so they retire.
Others decide to use the opportunity to move up the political ladder. The congressional districts were redrawn, which gave state Sen. Dave Koehler (D-Peoria) a possible opening. He took it.
If history is any guide, we’re likely to see a raft of retirement announcements in the next few days, weeks, months and even years.
The numbers so far have been impressive. Republican Sen. Larry Bomke and GOP Reps. David Winters and Franco Coladipietro have already announced that they aren’t running again. Democratic Rep. Dan Reitz resigned last month and was replaced by Congressman Jerry Costello’s son, Jerry Costello, II. Some didn’t even wait for the new map to be finished, like Sens. Rickey Hendon, Brad Burzynski, Dale Risinger, Lou Viverito and Gary Dahl. The rumor mill is ablaze with speculation about other impending retirements, resignations and people moving up the ladder.
There are those who think that the players never change in Springfield. Not true. And the remap years are a major reason people move on.
I started writing about Illinois politics in 1990. Not a single incumbent state Senator from that year is still serving today. Senate President John Cullerton was around, but he was in the House in 1990.
And while Michael Madigan was elected House Speaker before I was legally able to drink alcohol, only a small handful of House members from 1990 are still around. Madigan started out in 1971. House Majority Leader Barb Currie’s first year was 1979. Rep. David Harris started in 1983, but was beaten in 1992 and then came back this year. Reps. Mary Flowers and Ron Stephens were sworn into office in 1985 and Rep. Lou Lang and Monique Davis came along two years later. Rep. David Leitch was first appointed to the Senate in 1986 and started his House service in 1989. That’s just eight people out of 118 seats — or less than 7 percent.
Donne Trotter (1988), Jeff Schoenberg (1990) and, of course, Cullerton (1979) were also in the House back in 1990, but they’re now in the Senate.
The point is, I’m never truly surprised when a legislator announces his or her retirement. But despite all that history, I was a bit taken aback when Sen. Susan Garrett (D-Lake Forest) announced last month that she wouldn’t run again.
Garrett, who turned 61 last February, is one of those people you figure would never go away. Although she represents the tony North Shore, she seemed to thrive on the bare-knuckled aspect of day-to-day politics.
But Garrett said last month that she came to the conclusion that she “didn’t want to be a career politician.”
I was also a little shocked when Rep. Ron Stephens (R-Greenville) abruptly resigned last week. Except for two years in exile when he lost his seat in 1990 and won it back when the Republicans gave him a new district in the 1991 remap, Stephens has been around for what seems like forever.
The Democrats mapped Stephens into the same district as Rep. John Cavaletto (R-Salem). Stephens, however, could’ve moved into a neighboring, GOP district and likely have run opposed.
Then again, the economy is not all that conducive to selling real estate these days — a problem which is weighing far more heavily on Republican incumbents than ever before during past remap games.
Despite the perception, legislators as a group are not wealthy people. Most are facing the same problems as everyone else. Many of their homes are practically unsellable in the current economy or are “underwater,” or both. Purchasing or renting another home in a new district is simply not an option for many pols these days.
The bottom line is change is coming. Or, at least lots of new faces.
* Related…
* GOP remap would split Champaign, Vermilion counties: The plan places Johnson in the same congressional district as freshman Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Manteno. Further, it splits Champaign and Vermilion counties approximately in half, with the district lines running just south of Champaign-Urbana.
* Republicans say Democrats’ plan tears apart the Southland
* Dissatisfaction + redistricting = huge turnover in Congress
Longer lines, shorter hours and fewer services at pharmacies will be the result of a proposal by Gov. Pat Quinn’s administration to slash the reimbursement rate for Medicaid patients’ prescriptions, according to a new group formed to fight the rate cuts.
But officials at the Department of Healthcare and Family Services say Illinois’ debt-riddled state government needs to save money, and the proposed rates are in line with what the private sector pays.
The department proposed the new rates, which would cut reimbursement rates for Medicaid patients’ prescription drugs by 4 percent, on July 29. The public has 45 days to comment on the rates to the General Assembly’s Joint Committee on Administrative Rules. JCAR could vote on the new rates in October.
The state estimates it will save $42 million out of roughly $1.5 billion in Medicaid prescription costs per year. Pharmacists say that while the cut appears small in the context of how much Illinois spends on Medicaid prescriptions, their profit margins are small – often as low as 2 percent.
“All of a sudden, you’re taking all of our profit,” said David Vite, president of the Illinois Retail Merchants Association, a member of the new coalition, which is called Pharmacy Choice and Access Now.
It’s been over a year since the governor issued an order calling for the sale of surplus state property as a way to raise money during the fiscal meltdown. At the time, we compared it to a big garage sale.
So, what did the state sell and how much was raised?
Actually, the net effect of Quinn’s edict thus far has been a bill that will cost the state $750,000 in the end.
That’s because the Illinois Department of Central Management Services, which oversees state property, has hired a consultant, Jones Lang LaSalle, to study the situation and then recommend what property to sell, when to sell it and how much to sell it for.
Over a nine-year period ending in 2009, the Illinois State Fair cut its annual loss nearly in half.
But according to the most recent audit available of fair finances, the 10-day event still lost nearly $2.8 million two years ago. Some officials question that expense at a time when state government continues to struggle with paying its bills and just enacted a budget that makes cuts to dozens of human-service programs.
The 2011 state fair begins Friday.
“I love the state fair, and I’ll be back again, but you have to be running it in a revenue-neutral way,” said Sen. Matt Murphy of Palatine, the Senate Republicans’ point man on the state budget.
* We should probably expect a “solution” to this wholly manufactured (by the governor) crisis sometime this week…
Illinois’ regional superintendents of schools agreed this past week to continue working, more than a month after Gov. Pat Quinn eliminated their salaries from the state budget.
But Robert A. Daiber, superintendent of the Madison County Regional Office of Education and president of the Illinois Association of Regional Superintendents of Schools, said he’s not sure how long that agreement will last. And, he said, he’s not sure what effect that could have on the start of the new school year.
“Is there going to be a statewide shutdown? I can’t say. Will they say at Labor Day, ‘I’ve had enough?’ I don’t know,” Daiber said. “There are people very, very disgruntled about missing a third paycheck.”
Federal investigators have opened a criminal probe into legislative scholarships that lobbyist and former state Rep. Robert Molaro awarded as a lawmaker, the Chicago Sun-Times has learned.
Two rounds of subpoenas related to Molaro’s scholarships have been delivered to the Illinois State Board of Education since April, one as recently as July 20, records show.
The first subpoena from U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald’s office, dated April 26, sought paperwork concerning tuition waivers worth more than $94,000 that Molaro awarded to four children of his campaign contributor Phil Bruno, an Oak Lawn real estate broker.
The subpoena from two weeks ago casts a broader net, seeking “all documents relating to the Illinois General Assembly Legislative Scholarships nominated/issued from former State Representative Robert S. Molaro.”
* Venture capitalist Bruce Rauner made some noises about running for governor in 2010. The Sun-Times apparently believes he is more serious about the next governor’s election, which is more than three years away…
Bruce Rauner, the venture capitalist who helped make Mayor Rahm Emanuel a millionaire, is edging toward a run for governor of Illinois as a Republican, prominent Illinois Republicans tell the Sun-Times.
Rauner, 55, is senior principal and chairman of Chicago-based GTCR Golder Rauner LLC, a Chicago-based private equity firm.
He recently garnered attention as a prime mover of the education reform legislation that passed Springfield, smashing teachers’ right to strike and paving the way for longer school days in Chicago.
Rauner has been testing the waters and telling other Republicans he is gearing up to run, senior elected Republicans and Republican campaign veterans told the Sun-Times. Rauner did not return a call seeking comment.
Other Republicans looking at the 2014 race are Sens. Bill Brady and Kirk Dillard, Treasurer Dan Rutherford and possibly even Congressman Aaron Schock.
* Rauner has contributed over a million dollars to state and local campaign funds over the years. The biggest recipient of his largesse was Forrest Claypool, who received three big contributions totaling $250,000 in 2001, 2005 and 2006. Former Mayor Daley received $200,000. The Illinois Republican Party and the House Republicans were also major beneficiaries. George Ryan got a check in 1998.
* Last year, Rauner floated an idea to raise a pile of money to lease vacant public school buildings for charter schools. Rauner has his own charter school. He was also heavily involved in Stand for Children Illinois’ major push into Illinois politics last year. His name was floated as a possible Chicago schools CEO and Rauner said he “cried both times” he saw the movie “Waiting for Superman.”
His firm does a lot of work with the outsourcing industry, which could prove to be a valuable mining opportunity for opponents.
* Related…
* Illinois Treasurer Fears Credit Downgrade could Affect State
* Maximum property tax hike sought for Chicago public schools
Jim Oberweis said he would not seek the Republican nomination for Kane County Board chairman in 2012, but he is eyeing a run for the 25th State Senatorial District. […]
“I have a number of people encouraging me for the senate in the 25th District,” Oberweis said, referring to the seat currently held by State Sen. Chris Lauzen R-Aurora since 1992. “I am taking that very seriously. I suspect he [Lauzen] is not going to run for re-election.”
Oberweis said he would decide in a couple of weeks.
Lauzen himself is pondering whether to run for re-election, county board chairman or congress against former Congressman Bill Foster in the newly drawn 11th Congressional District.
Think of the nose-diving career expectations here. He ran for US Senate in 2002 and 2004 and lost the primary both times. He lost the GOP primary for governor in 2006. Then he lost two congressional bids in 2008 (a special and a general). Now he’s thinking about state Senate?
Man, that would be weird having him down here. Interesting, for sure, but weird.
“After I won last year, my ex-wife filed a lawsuit against me,” he said. “For the past eight months I have been trying to work it out privately and legally and haven’t been able to. Let me say this – virtually everything in that [Chicago] Sun-Times piece was wildly and off-the-charts inaccurate. When I go to my grave a year or 10 or 100 from now, there’s only one thing I want on my tombstone, ‘He tried to be a hell of a dad.’ My kids have been my life. … This is different because this is personal.” [Emphasis added.]
You’ll recall that the Sun-Times recently reported that Walsh’s wife has sued him for allegedly owing over $100,000 in back child support. His lawyer appeared to admit in the piece that Walsh does owe something…
“Joe Walsh hasn’t been a big-time wage-earner politician until recently — he’s had no more problems with child support than any other average guy.”
Yet, he somehow had enough cash to loan his campaign $35,000 last year. People who are not “big-time wage-earners” don’t usually have that much mad money laying around. You get the feeling from reading the story that it might possibly be about a guy who’s trying to hide assets from his ex. That’s not exactly a rarity in the divorce world.
* Turning this controversy around on the media appears to be Walsh’s concept here…
“It’s an ongoing legal proceeding that involves my kids,” Walsh told the crowd. “This is something I’m going to fight, but I’m going to do it privately and legally. There is no way the media will get me to talk about my three kids. I won’t do it!” [Emphasis added.]
It seemed to work because nobody brought up the subject at the meeting.
Members of a newly formed group, the Northern Illinois chapter of Progressive Democrats of America, together with Catholics United held a protest at Congressman’s Joe Walsh’s office Saturday, July 30 in Fox Lake.
About 25 people attended the protest.
“The purpose was to express our distaste with a deadbeat dad representing the 8th Congressional district,” said group member Steve Williams of Lake Villa.
Whatever you think of Walsh, that action sorta left a bad taste in my mouth.
* How would you rate Gov. Pat Quinn’s job performance on a scale of one to ten? One being the worst, ten being the best. Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments. Thanks.
…Adding… I almost never step in on these questions, but the people who are giving the governor a “1″ really need to get a clue or stop being so knee-jerk partisan. Did you completely forget Rod Blagojevich already?
This isn’t the first time a governor envisioned the pollution board as a cushy sinecure: That’s also where Rod Blagojevich infamously tried to find a lucrative state job for his wife, Patti.
Yes, Rod Blagojevich did think about appointing his wife to the Pollution Control Board. However, he was told by his chief of staff that she wasn’t qualified…
Blagojevich proposed that he appoint his wife to the pollution control board, a post that paid $100,000 a year, but Harris said he was able to dissuade the governor after telling him that board members needed specific qualifications that Patti Blagojevich did not have.
So, that’s a truly disingenuous remark by the Trib.
* Republican Congresswoman Judy Biggert on the GOP’s federal lawsuit against the Democrats’ new redistricting map…
Biggert said there’s a legal precedent for success, that Republicans went to court in 1991 and had the Democratic maps overturned and created the first Latino district.
Um, no. The Republicans drew the maps in 1991.
…Adding… Corrected by a reader. Republicans drew the legislative map, but no congressional map passed, so the courts chose the GOP map. The Dem map, however, was not overturned, so the point is still the same.
On December 8, 2010, the City Council voted 46 to nothing to give CME—a multibillion-dollar company run by multimillionaires—$15 million in property tax dollars from the LaSalle/Central TIF district.
Curiously, almost nine months have passed and the city and CME still have not finalized the TIF deal. While CME did not respond to a request for comment, the city’s official explanation is they’re studying the fine print, making sure that all the Is are dotted and Ts crossed. “It’s not unusual for final details to be addressed as an RDA [redevelopment agreement] is completed,” says Susan Massel, a spokeswoman for the city’s department of Housing and Economic Development. “That’s what is happening.”
The scuttlebutt at City Hall is that the Merc is balking at the deal. Why? Because they’d like to get even a better deal—they’re wrangling with the state to get a tax break. The corporate income tax rate in Illinois increased this year from 7.3 percent to 9.5 percent.
If CME were to take the $15 million the city is desperately trying to give them, they’d have a harder time leveraging the state for a tax break.
Let’s take a moment to review this. In short, we, the happy idiots of Chicago, gave the CME $15 million to keep jobs in town. And now CME is threatening to move if they don’t get a better break.
* Cleaning up the mess created by Gov. Pat Quinn’s veto of funding for regional superintendent salaries is not going to be easy. The governor wants to pay them using funds from the corporate personal property replacement tax. He says that’s the way to do it because many of the tax proceeds already go to local schools. But the cash also goes to local governments, and some of them are not happy in the least about this idea…
Rock Island County chairman Jim Bohnsack said the county simply doesn’t have the funds that could be required under draft legislation to pay the salaries of the Rock Island County regional superintendent and the assistant superintendent. […]
Ms. Kraft said other locally elected officials are paid through PPRT and the governor believes regional superintendents also should be paid through these funds. She said if the draft legislation would be approved, possibly during the fall veto session, it likely would fall to Rock Island County to pay for the regional superintendent and assistant salaries.
Mr. Bohnsack said the county has “no extra money” for these costs. He said the county had a $3.2 million deficit last year and made enough cuts — including eliminating 19 positions — to balance the budget with $2,300 in reserves. He said the county received $2.25 million this year in PPRT and those funds are added to the general fund. He said the majority of PPRT goes toward the justice system, including the salaries of correctional officers.
The governor says regional superintendents are local elected officials and should be paid with local funds.
[Sangamon County Regional Superintendent Jeff Vose] said Sangamon County already provides about $230,000 for employees’ salaries and provides office space.
“The county board is already doing its share,” he said.
* Some regional superintendents are now saying that instead of trying to work out a deal with Quinn, the General Assembly ought to just override his veto this October…
[Debbie Niederhauser, regional superintendent of schools for Adams and Pike counties] said the notion of using PPRT to pay regional superintendents “is not what we’re proposing.”
She said: “He (Quinn) thinks we should be paid regionally even though we do the state’s work and we’re state employees.”
Niederhauser said she would like to see the Legislature restore the salaries by simply overriding the governor’s veto. But there is no assurance that may happen.
But state Rep. Chapin Rose, R-Mahomet, said he would oppose such a move [to pay the superintendents out of the personal property tax replacement fund] because some local school districts, including those in Tuscola and Mahomet, get money from the tax.
“It’s the principle that if you start moving $10 or $12 million today, next year it will be $43 million and in three years it would be $100 million,” Rose said.
Calling it “the stupidest veto ever,” Rose said he would vote to override the veto and restore state funding for the offices.
“He made a mistake; let’s put it back in,” Rose said. “To their credit,, the regional superintendents said that despite the governor’s ridiculous veto that jeopardizes kids coming back to school, they would work until the fall veto session. That’s very statesman-like. They get credit in my book.”
An override looks to be the easiest way around this craziness.
Women will have to wait at least another six months before they can possibly join the Springfield Motor Boat Club.
Gene Hayes, commodore of the private club on Lake Springfield, said late Thursday a vote that would have allowed women to become full members of the club failed because of a procedural problem.
The “no” vote did not have anything to do with the merits of the proposal, Hayes said, and another vote could be taken in six months. […]
The Springfield Motor Boat Club, 17 Club Area, has restricted membership to men since the club was formed in 1933. An effort in 2005 to allow women to be full members failed. The Motor Boat Club did not allow reporters to attend Thursday’s meeting. Hayes commented by telephone after the meeting.
Not only is it supremely offensive and truly goofy that a dinky little boat club would deny membership to females in 2011, but the City of Springfield owns the land that the club sits on. The club leases the land from the town. Yet, Springfield has no ordinances against discrimination by these lake clubs on its very own property.
I don’t belong to any lake clubs, by the way. I just don’t feel the need to shell out bucks every month for the right to buy a hamburger.
Ward 5 Ald. Sam Cahnman wants the Springfield Motor Boat Club, and any other club that leases land from the city, to be required to allow female and male members. […]
The city code already prohibits discrimination against women in employment, financial credit and public accommodations.
“Yet we lease our most treasured public land on Lake Springfield to a club which openly discriminates against women by prohibiting them from being full members,” Cahnman said. “Ninety-one years after women gained the right to vote, this is a form of discrimination we cannot and must not tolerate any longer in Abraham Lincoln’s hometown.”
