New industry, new jobs, but buyer beware
Tuesday, Aug 20, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* A buddy of mine told me the other day that he’s leaving politics and going to work for a medical marijuana-related company. A childhood friend, a family farmer, asked me recently about opportunities for him in the med-mar business.
I told my buddy to be very careful and told my childhood friend that this would be big business with huge startup costs and possible federal prison risks, so he might wanna think again.
* Even so, a new industry is being created here in Illinois, and the National Cannabis Industry Association is holding a big conference in Chicago billed as “the first comprehensive marijuana business symposium ever conducted in the Midwest.”
* This is serious stuff…
This day-long educational program will be a unique opportunity to glean information from cannabusiness professionals and experts in the fields of regulatory models, operations, and ancillary businesses.
* One of the speakers…
Hilary Bricken
Partner, Canna Law Group
Seattle, WA
Regarded as one of Washington State’s premier cannabis business attorneys, Hilary helps cannabis companies of all sizes with everything from corporate structure and intellectual property protection to branding, licensing, and medical cannabis law. Hilary’s primary focus is helping cannabis businesses navigate the increasingly confusing and murky legal climate surrounding Washington State medical and recreational cannabis laws. She has represented clients struggling with a host of common problems in the industry, from business license denials, revocations, and injunctions to land-use disputes and moratoria on cannabis businesses.
Industries need lawyers and lobbyists, and CPAs…
Bridge West, CPAs is currently the pre-eminent accounting firm serving the cannabis industry in the United States, and internationally.
Founded by two CPAs in California and Colorado with decades of experience in this field, Bridge West intends to create affiliated offices in every major city and state which has legalized cannabis use.
* But this is not a good thing…
Chicago’s first medical marijuana clinic, Good Intentions LLC, opened its doors to a string of new patients Wednesday in Wicker Park.
The clinic, strategically opened near the Kennedy Expressway and adjacent to two other medical facilities on Ashland Avenue, accepted its first patients at 10 a.m.; by mid-morning, DNAinfo Chicago reported more than 30 patients had already visited.
“We’ll be informing people about the Illinois medical marijuana program,” Good Intentions owner and registered nurse Tammy Jacobi told Fox Chicago. “We’re going to be establishing relationships with our doctor. We’re encouraging patients to contact primary doctors first but we want people to know that we’re here, they can talk to us, find out if medical marijuana may be right for them.”
The new law requires that patients have an “existing relationship” with a doctor before they can get medical marijuana, so this looks like a way to establish that relationship.
* Some folks weren’t all that happy with what the clinic was offering…
On Wednesday, the clinic charged some people a $99 fee for an individual care plan that would later be formulated. […]
Stuart Bander, 50, who said he’s been suffering from multiple sclerosis for 20 years, was disappointed with the staff’s answers to his questions about the law.
“I know more than they do,” he said. “They’re doing nothing.”
A $99 fee up front to establish a care plan that isn’t yet formulated?
What?
* The state is apparently looking into it…
Just before the clinic closed for the day Wednesday, two men who said they were from the state medical board showed up and met privately with Murray.
When asked about the meeting, a spokeswoman for the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, Susan Hofer, said she could not confirm that anyone from the department had been to the office.
Hofer said that because rules for the “prior relationship” with the doctor who helps a patient qualify to receive medical marijuana haven’t been established yet, nobody can say whether what’s going on at this clinic would qualify as a prior relationship when the law goes into effect.
I called Ms. Hofer today. By law, she could neither confirm nor deny that there is any sort of investigation.
But, Hofer said, “The law is very explicit that your personal physician… would be the one who certifies that you’re eligible,” adding, “The people who are eligible for medical marijuana are already under the treatment of a doctor.”
No rules have been written yet, Hofer stressed, but “from the perspective of our Department, a doctor-patient relationship would have already been developed because the patient already had the disease that would have qualified him or her for medical marijuana. If you had that, why would you need to go to another clinic?”
Exactly.
It’s probably best to shy away from such places. Save your money.
25 Comments  
|
* Rep. Elaine Nekritz talked with WBBM about the pension reform negotiations…
“What I think you’re seeing is some frustration that the conference committee – the bipartisan bicameral conference committee – is not making as rapid process as I think that many would like, and I would agree with that,” Nekritz said. “But the fact is we are making progress, and everybody at that table – and by everybody, I mean all four caucuses – remain very committed to getting something significant done.” […]
For the first time, all four caucuses are agreeing on some pension reform measures.
“We are all coming together in good faith, and negotiating, and these negotiations are very delicate,” she said. “But this is the first time that all four caucuses have been at the table, agreeing on anything with regard to the pension situation.”
* She said pretty much the same thing to Illinois Public Radio…
* Sen. Bill Brady, a member of the conference committee, expressed some frustrations, but also some optimism…
State Sen. Bill Brady (R-Bloomington) said the committee that’s trying to find a solution to the state’s pension crisis takes two steps forward and one step back.
Gov. Pat Quinn used his veto power to suspend state lawmakers’ pay because of their inaction on Illinois’ pension crisis. He halted lawmaker pay after a committee he commissioned failed to come up with a pension solution by a July deadline.
Brady said he thinks the Democrats are frustrated with Quinn.
“Clearly the pushback from the Democrats is, they don’t want to give him a win on this, and it has not helped the environment at all,” Brady said. […]
“I’m afraid the Democrats may want to see a judge call the governor’s actions unconstitutional before they really move seriously on this. That may be a reality, we’ll see,” Brady said. […]
Brady said, though, he’s is hoping the committee can get something to the legislature before Labor Day.
* Raw audio of Brady’s interview…
* But Sen. Daniel Biss said the governor’s veto is being ignored by the committee…
“There’s a huge amount of atmospherics outside,” says Biss, “and, so far, I think, we’ve done, internally, a good job of ignoring it and trying to work on the actual goal at hand and let other people worry about all the other considerations.” Those “atmospherics” would include speculation that the governor’s tactics have steeled lawmakers – particularly his fellow Democrats – against him. […]
Biss insists the governor’s decision last month to veto lawmakers’ pay is not a distraction: “A lot of people in America don’t have a paycheck right now,” he said.
* Rep. Nekritz agrees…
“I’ve talked with a number of my House colleagues over the last two weeks. Nobody has said to me, (a) we are not willing to vote on it, and (b) we want you to do something different on the conference committee because of” wanting to embarrass the governor.
Do you believe them?
38 Comments
|
13th District roundup
Tuesday, Aug 20, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Champaign/Urbana liberals who think George Gollin is too moderate are in luck…
A third Democrat is jumping into the 13th Congressional District race, joining former Madison County Judge Ann Callis and University of Illinois Professor George Gollin.
David Green, 63, of Champaign promises an “insurgent campaign” that will “appeal to leftists in the Democratic Party, those who identify with other leftists parties, including the Green Party and anti-war libertarianism.” […]
“First of all, I’m anti-war, anti-military-industrial complex, anti-intervention in other counties, anti-military bases in other countries,” he said. “I’m anti-Wall Street and anti-big bank and the financialization of the economy. And I’m anti-business-as-usual in Washington in terms of the leaders in Washington not being accountable to the voters as much as to the corporate lobbyists and so forth. […]
He also favors “free education for all from preschool through graduate school.”
Obviously, the favorite here is the DCCC’s candidate Ann Callis.
* Meanwhile, on the other side of the district’s aisle…
U.S. Rep. Rodney Davis reiterated Thursday that while he believes in climate change, he does not support a cap-and-trade law to limit carbon emissions or any other measure that he said would increase energy costs on industry and consumers.
The League of Conservation Voters has begun running television ads in the Champaign and St. Louis markets, attacking the Taylorville Republican for his position on cap-and-trade proposals. It accuses him of opposing “President Obama’s common sense climate change plan” that “would significantly cut carbon pollution from power plants, which are the single largest source of carbon pollution.”
Both Davis and his Republican primary opponent, Urbana attorney Erika Harold, said Thursday they oppose cap-and-trade laws and more environmental regulation of coal-fired power plants.
“Their agenda is clearly a cap-and-trade system which is a tax on carbon that will kill American jobs and raise our utility rates. The question you need to ask them is how much do you want citizens in Springfield, Illinois, and Champaign, Illinois, to pay to flip on their light switches?” Davis said during Republican Day festivities at the state fair and elsewhere in Springfield. “How much do you want people to actually grow the unemployment rolls, because they don’t have jobs because you have shut down our energy plants, some of the best job-providers in this country.
* Here’s the ad…
* Bernie…
The League of Conservation Voters announced this week it is running TV ads in Champaign-Springfield and St. Louis markets, saying that U.S. Rep. Rodney Davis, R-Taylorville, “denies climate-change science. […]
An announcer in the ad says that 97 percent of scientists agree climate change is happening, NASA says it’s worsening extreme weather, and Davis suggested that “global warming has stopped 16 years ago.” […]
[Davis spokesman Andrew Flach] points out that the quote lifted from an Illinois Public Media interview in October doesn’t include Davis’ almost-immediate expansion on the issue, saying he would “love to see more stats. …”
“But climate change is real,” he said then. “The debate is over whether or not it’s man-made or natural.” He also said at the time that it needs to be determined how “we ensure that we continue to reduce emissions in this country at levels that we have compared to other nations, while still not putting America and the American economy and American job creation at a disadvantage.”
Sounds like he’s trying to have it both ways.
Climate change, I’m told by some Democratic strategists, is becoming a real issue for female voters. It’s a “filter” they’re beginning to use to judge candidates overall, the way gay rights used to be. If the candidates are climate change deniers, then they’re more likely to be unacceptable to those voters. So that may be one reason why Democratic treasurer candidate Mike Frerichs has been all over the climate change issue lately.
* More Bernie…
ERIKA HAROLD of Urbana, a lawyer who happens to have been the 2003 Miss America, looks as if she’ll be getting some more national publicity as she runs for the U.S. House in the 13th Congressional District, which includes part of Springfield.
At the GOP lunch at the state fair on Republican Day last week, a contract video crew for ABC News was on hand.
Harold said they wanted to record her “interacting with voters for a special” that is planned for September. She said the program is about “several people in different states, and they reached out to me,” but she didn’t want to reveal more about the show because “I think it’s a surprise.”
She’s unique, so that’s national news. But she still needs to start raising real money.
15 Comments
|
Yep, we still suck
Tuesday, Aug 20, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* This almost glowing IDES press release obscures some really bad news, which I highlighted for you…
Private Sector Adds 7,100 Jobs in July
Summer Unemployment Trend Continues
CHICAGO – Illinois added 7,100 private sector jobs in July and the unemployment rate was 9.2 percent, according to preliminary data released today by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) and the Illinois Department of Employment Security (IDES). Illinois added 62,100 private sector jobs compared to July 2012. The data is seasonally adjusted.
“Three consecutive months of positive job numbers underscores the deliberate pace of our economic growth,” IDES Director Jay Rowell said. “Three consecutive summers with an uptick in the unemployment rate here and elsewhere suggests a trend unrelated to job growth and merits watching.”
Employers posted more than 195,000 help-wanted ads in Illinois in July, the Conference Board stated. Nearly 80 percent were full-time positions. The data is seasonally adjusted.
Illinois has added +244,300 private sector jobs since January 2010 when job growth returned following nearly two years of consecutive monthly declines. Leading growth sectors are Professional and Business Services (+110,100); Education and Health Services (+57,100); and Trade, Transportation and Utilities (+46,000). Government has lost the most jobs since January 2010, down -33,200.
Volatility has been the hallmark of this economic cycle. When compared to the previous month, Illinois recorded job growth in 31 months and job loss in 12. Unemployment fell in 24 months, increased in nine and was unchanged in 10. Sustained consumer confidence could reduce volatility.
The three-month moving average unemployment rate, which smoothes monthly volatility, was unchanged at 9.2 percent in July. In July 2013, the number of unemployed individuals increased slightly for the second time since March, up +4,200 (+0.7 percent) to 604,700. Total unemployed has fallen -147,500 (-19.6 percent) since early 2010 when the state unemployment rate peaked at 11.3 percent for the months of January and February.
The unemployment rate identifies those who are out of work and seeking employment. A person who exhausts benefits, or is ineligible, still will be reflected in the unemployment rate if they actively seek work. Historically, the national unemployment rate is lower than the state rate. The state rate has been lower than the national rate only six times since January 2000.
Ugh.
21 Comments
|
It ain’t just Chicago
Tuesday, Aug 20, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* John Tillman of the Illinois Policy Institute writes…
When a GOP candidate hits 20 percent of the vote in Chicago, the math is such that they will almost always win so long as they don’t massively underperform elsewhere.
Tillman uses this stat to show that Bill Brady could’ve won in 2010 had he done better in Chicago.
* But a look at the numbers shows it’s just not that simple. Bill Brady won 17.41 percent of the city vote in 2010. But Republican Mark Kirk took 19.47 percent of Chicago’s total.
However, the difference in the two totals was just 13,971 votes (134,081 minus 120,110). Brady lost to Quinn by 31,834 votes statewide. Kirk beat Alexi Giannoulias by 59,220 votes statewide. Winning 20 percent of the city’s vote wouldn’t have made up for Brady’s other problems.
* The difference? Partly in Kirk’s congressional district, where he was much better known. Kirk outpolled Brady by 27,773 votes in suburban Cook County. Kirk did better than Brady in Lake County by 12,296 votes.
But Kirk did better than Brady in every suburban county. If you include suburban Cook, Kirk outpolled Brady by 56,184 suburban votes. Exclude Cook, and Kirk received 28,411 more suburban votes than Brady. There’s your election.
The bottom line here is that the Republicans had better field a candidate who can perform well in the suburbs. And that’s where ideology comes into play.
…Adding… From Tillman…
Hi, Rich,
Read your post and I actually don’t disagree with your points but I do disagree with how you characterize my point.
You pull this line I wrote:
“When a GOP candidate hits 20 percent of the vote in Chicago, the math is such that they will almost always win so long as they don’t massively under perform elsewhere.
And then you wrote:
“Tillman uses this stat to show that Bill Brady could’ve won in 2010 had he done better in Chicago.”
I did not say that. My point was clear: That a GOP nominee cannot “massively underperform elsewhere” but hitting at least 20% is a starting point. Brady did under perform relative to Kirk, as you rightly point out, in the suburbs (in terms of percent of the vote) and downstate (in terms of generating turnout).
John
30 Comments
|
Confusion over new speed limit law
Tuesday, Aug 20, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From the new speed limit law, which Gov. Pat Quinn signed yesterday…
(d-1) Unless some other speed restriction is established under this Chapter, the maximum speed limit outside an urban district for any vehicle is
(1) 70 miles per hour on any interstate highway as defined by Section 1-133.1 of this Code;
(2) 65 miles per hour for all or part of highways that are designated by the Department, have at least 4 lanes of traffic, and have a separation between the roadways moving in opposite directions; and
(3) 55 miles per hour for all other highways, roads, and streets. The counties of Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, Madison, McHenry, St. Clair, and Will may adopt ordinances setting a maximum speed limit on highways, roads, and streets that is lower than the limits established by this Section. […]
1.5. 70 miles per hour upon any interstate highway as defined by Section 1-133.1 of this Code outside the counties of Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry, and Will;
* From Gov. Quinn’s press release…
Governor Pat Quinn today signed a new law to increase the speed limit from 65 to 70 miles-per-hour (mph) on rural four-lane highways, and to lower the limit by five mph for excessive speeding. The law will bring Illinois’ speed limit in line with 36 other states that have speed limits of 70 mph or higher on some portion of their roadways, including other large states such as California, Florida, Texas and Ohio, and neighboring states such as Indiana, Kentucky, Missouri, Iowa and Michigan. The bill passed with significant bipartisan support in both chambers.
“This limited five miles-per-hour increase will bring Illinois’ rural interstate speed limits in line with our neighbors and the majority of states across America, while preventing an increase in excessive speeding,” Governor Quinn said. “I encourage all motorists to continue to respect our traffic laws, avoid distractions and exercise common sense behind the wheel to protect the safety of themselves and others.”
Sponsored by State Senator Jim Oberweis (R-Sugar Grove) and State Representative Jerry Costello Jr. (D-Smithton), Senate Bill 2356 increases the maximum speed limit from 65 to 70 mph on four-lane divided highways outside of urban areas. The law allows Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, Madison, McHenry, St. Clair and Will Counties to opt-out by adopting an ordinance that sets a lower maximum speed limit, empowering counties to make adjustments based on their own local needs.
* Sen. Jim Oberweis says that’s not so…
“The governor’s press release misstated the facts,” said state Sen. Jim Oberweis (R-Sugar Grove), the bill’s chief Senate sponsor, who insisted it was his intent for the higher speed limit to apply to even clogged arteries in Chicago and suburbia.
“The bill moves the speed limit to 70 mph for all interstates and tollways in Illinois,” Oberweis said, with an aide to Senate Minority Leader Christine Radogno (R-Lemont) backing up Oberweis’ interpretation.
* OK, despite the somewhat confusing county exemptions, the statute sets the new 70 mph speed limit for “any interstate highway as defined by Section 1-133.1 of this Code.” Here’s Section 1-133.1…
625 ILCS 5/1-133.1) (from Ch. 95 1/2, par. 1-133.1)
Sec. 1-133.1. Interstate highway. Any highway which is now, or shall hereafter be, a part of the national system of interstate and defense highways within this State.
But then there’s the line about county exemptions from 1-133.1’s definition of what an interstate highway is, so perhaps the governor is correct.
* However…
“Our interpretation is that this law does not impact our county highway system — 55 remains the maximum speed limit along the county’s roadways,” said Johnna Kelly, a spokeswoman for the DuPage County Board.
“The county doesn’t have jurisdiction over the tollway and IDOT roads,” she said.
A top Will County official echoed those sentiments.
“I think there’s a little confusion,” said Anastasia Tuskey, a spokeswoman for Will County Executive Lawrence M. Walsh. “Our county highway director said we can’t regulate any state highway speeds.”
Cleanup bill, perhaps?
34 Comments
|
Today’s numbers
Tuesday, Aug 20, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Tedd McClelland at NBC5…
In this century, the Republicans have gone 4-for-23 in statewide elections — a .173 winning percentage.
Tedd blames this sad record on the GOP’s conservative bent by looking at the moderates who won those four statewide races…
In the 21st Century, only three Republicans have won a statewide election in Illinois: Judy Baar Topinka, elected treasurer in 2002 and comptroller in 2010; Mark Kirk, elected to the U.S. Senate in 2010; and Dan Rutherford, elected treasurer in 2010.
Thoughts?
* Meanwhile, a conservative Republican is gearing up for a run for state treasurer…
I haven’t sent an email regarding fundraising, volunteering or anything else in a while, but the time has now come to start building the bridge that will lead to my 2014 State of Illinois Treasurer election.
I’m writing to ask if you would be one of the first donors and more importantly, supporter to my election campaign?
If you’re IN — just go to www.michaelscottcarter.com and give whatever is comfortable for you.
Your donation of $50, $100, $250, or even $500 would be very helpful as I prepare to kick-off my campaign.
Your support will send a strong message to the liberal attack machine that Illinois and America want leaders with fiscal discipline as we Bringing Back Mainstreet… One Neighborhood at a Time and generating economic growth to all 110 counties in Illinois
Your support would mean a great deal to me as I prepare to kick-off the petitioning on September 3rd and start working to get Illinois back on track and moving forward in the right direction.
Thank you in advance for believing in me and your ongoing support.
Warmest regards,
Michael Scott Carter
State Treasurer Candidate [Emphasis added.]
I wasn’t aware that Illinois had annexed southern Wisconsin. The “Illinois Dells” somehow just doesn’t have the same resonance, but I suppose I could get used to it.
96 Comments
|
Past-due bill report
Monday, Aug 19, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From the comptroller’s office…
Our oldest regular voucher for FY 14 is 5 July 2013, those vouchers are 32 working days in arrears.
Our oldest regular voucher for FY 13 is 26 July 2013, those vouchers are 16 working days in arrears.
Our oldest medical voucher is 11 July 2013, those vouchers are 28 working days in arrears.
24 Comments
|
A good preview
Monday, Aug 19, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Dan Balz writes about the upcoming Democratic gubernatorial primary…
When I asked him how he sized up his opponent, Quinn said: “He’s not a reformer. Never has been. He’s not a progressive. Never has been. He’s not an organizer of grass-roots campaigns. Never has been. When you run in Illinois as a Democrat, you’d better be a progressive, you’d better be a reformer and you’d better know how to interact with everyday people. I’ve been doing that for the last 40 years.” […]
Quinn, [Daley] says, is “a nice guy” but a weak leader who has failed repeatedly to solve the state’s budgetary problems, even though Democrats control the legislature in Springfield. “A state like ours, any state, needs a strong governor. And if there’s anything that most people, I think, would say, it’s that Pat is not a strong governor,” Daley said from his office on the 25th floor of the JPMorgan Chase building.
Daley served as a senior executive at JPMorgan Chase before and after his time in the Obama White House. Quinn has seized on that experience to attack him. When I asked Quinn how he would respond to criticism that his state has such a high jobless rate, his reply offered a taste of the rough campaign ahead.
“Did this come from a banker who was with an institution that wrecked the American economy? Ran it into a ditch, as President Obama said?” he said. “An institution that has engaged in improper mortgage practices found by the attorney general, caused hardship, ruined the housing industry. People are going to judge who’s on their side when it comes to jobs, and we’ll see how they judge.”
He’s right that Quinn isn’t a strong leader.
But Daley still has an office in the JPMorgan Chase building? Really? Sheesh.
This nasty back and forth could create a clear opening for a third candidate. It’s why Quinn doesn’t want Sen. Raoul in the race. I doubt he’ll be able to attack Raoul like he’s been doing to Daley - not without creating a backlash, anyway. And Daley may think he wants Raoul in the mix, but how many Quinn-hating Democrats are gonna be enthusiastic about voting for a bankster with a name like Daley if there’s a viable alternative? To some, this looks to be shaping up as another CM-B 1992. I’m not so sure yet, but there are some resemblances.
39 Comments
|
Quick thoughts on a massive bill signing dump
Monday, Aug 19, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Gov. Pat Quinn took action on dozens of bills this past Friday. Here’s just one of them…
Bill No.: HB 3139
An Act Concerning: Transportation
Allows motorists to use an electronic form of proof of insurance and changes online requirements for insurance companies.
Action: Vetoed
I loved that bill because I almost always forget to put my updated insurance card in my car.
So why did he veto it? His explanation…
The language in this bill is duplicative of language in Senate Bill 1775, which is still under consideration.
Could it be because HB 3139 was originally sponsored by indicted state Rep. Derrick Smith and SB 1775 is sponsored by Sen. Bill Haine?
* Quinn also signed HB 49…
Makes it a Class 3 felony to sell, purchase, install, transfer, possess, use, or access any automated sales suppression device, zapper, or phantom-ware in Illinois.
Quinn has signed several bills sponsored by Rep. Jack Franks, but I don’t remember a public ceremony for any of them. No mystery there. Franks has often slammed Quinn in public. From Franks’ press release…
Legislation introduced by state Rep. Jack Franks, D-Marengo, cracking down on high-tech sales tax avoidance will be signed into law this afternoon. Franks’ measure takes aim at curtailing the falsification of electronic cash register records to lower a business’ tax liability.
“The notion that billions in sales tax revenue is being lost due to businesses cooking their books is unconscionable,” Franks said. “Even though it was already illegal to cheat on taxes, ‘tax-zappers’ created an easy way for an unscrupulous few to cheat that is very hard to track.”
House Bill 49 bans the possession or sale of computer software, known as a ‘tax-zapper,’ that allows a business to underreport taxable income by doctoring transaction records. By inserting a flash drive into an electronic register, the zapper alters receipts, thereby artificially lowering the business’ tax liability.
Sounds like a good bill.
* Quinn used his amendatory veto powers on this one…
Bill No.: HB 2454
An Act Concerning: Local Government
Restricts content of advisory referenda for township governments.
Action: Amendatory Vetoed
From his veto message…
However, this legislation simultaneously silences the voices of the citizens by limiting the topics which may be the subject of advisory referenda. By restricting the public policy issues which may be raised via referenda to those “directly related to the business of the township,” this bill undercuts the democratic process. While the business of the township is no doubt important, other issues are of equal or greater importance to the citizens, such as health care and the minimum wage. Our citizens must be able to weigh in and address those issues as well.
Government belongs to the people. We must do all we can to ensure they have the opportunity to make their voices heard on these important issues.
* This bill had bipartisan support…
Bill No.: HB 131
An Act Concerning: Reports of Stun Gun and Taser Use by Law Enforcement Officers.
Requires training for law enforcement officers who use tasers and stun guns.
Action: Signed
Effective: Jan. 1, 2014
* Another victims rights law is on the books…
Bill No.: HB 827
An Act Concerning: Criminal Law
Requires Office of the State’s Attorney to inform the victim’s family members of their right to present an impact statement at sentencing.
Action: Signed
Effective: Jan. 1, 2014
* This didn’t get much press…
Bill No.: HB 1063
An Act Concerning: Criminal Law
Removes statute of limitations for criminal actions against alleged perpetrators where victims of sexual offenses were under the age of 18 at the time of the offense.
Action: Signed
Effective: Jan. 1, 2014
* Interesting concept…
Bill No.: HB 1199
An Act Concerning: Transportation
Prohibits a person or entity from using an electronic tracking device, such as a GPS tracker, to determine the location or movement of another person.
Action: Signed
Effective: Jan. 1, 2014
* Pension reform, anyone?…
Bill No.: HB 1375
An Act Concerning: Public Employee Retirement Benefits
Increases survivor’s annuity to provide parity for surviving children of a deceased firefighter.
Action: Signed
Effective: Immediately
* Right under the media’s RTA radar screen…
Bill No.: HB 1389
An Act Concerning: Local Government
Extends the RTA’s authority to issue bonds to 2016.
Action: Signed
Effective: Immediately
* Probably a good idea, but will there be unexpected consequences?…
Bill No.: HB 1443
An Act Concerning: Criminal Law
Creates the criminal penalty for a school official’s failure to report to law enforcement after knowingly observing hazing.
Action: Signed
Effective: Immediately
* This concept began as a bill to abolish DCEO…
Bill No.: HB 1544
An Act Concerning: State Government
Creates the Illinois Business Development Council and requires the Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity to develop a strategic economic development plan.
Action: Signed
Effective: Immediately
* Expungement…
Bill No.: HB 1548
An Act Concerning: Criminal Law
Allows persons convicted of Class 3 or Class 4 felonies to apply for expungement with the Prisoner Review Board after they have served a tour of military duty.
Action: Signed
* Hooray!!!…
Bill No.: HB 1573
An Act Concerning: Liquor
Doubles the amount of beer a holder of a craft brewer’s license can produce to 930,000 gallons from 465,000.
Action: Signed
Effective: Immediately
* Some animal activists are gonna be upset…
Bill No.: HB 1652
An Act Concerning: Wildlife
Prohibits the use of a drone to interfere with hunting.
Action: Signed
Effective: Immediately
* This was becoming a problem in some areas…
Bill No.: HB 2520
An Act Concerning: Gaming
Adds poker runs to list of events considered charitable games.
Action: Signed
* This bill makes sure that corporate charter schools pay into the pension fund…
Bill No.: HB 2583
An Act Concerning: Public Employee Benefits
Makes changes and reforms to Chicago Teachers’ Pension Fund.
Action: Signed
From the Pension Impact Note…
According to the Chicago Teacher Pension Fund, there have been several instances of charter schools submitting required contributions late or not at all, and the pension fund believes that HB 2583 will provide for better enforcement of required pension contributions. HB 2583 should have a slight positive impact on the pension fund.
* Good idea…
Bill No.: HB 2590
An Act Concerning: Civil Law
Allows employers to seek orders of protection for an employee who has previously been a victim of unlawful violence.
Action: Signed
* I didn’t even know this was a problem…
Bill No.: HB 2640
An Act Concerning: Civil Law
Allows victims of human trafficking who are involuntarily tattooed to apply for assistance from the Crime Victims Compensation Fund for tattoo removal.
Action: Signed
* This could have a major impact…
Bill No.: HB 2695
An Act Concerning: Transportation
Requires that, by Jan. 1, 2016, 25 percent of all state-purchased vehicles be alternative fuel cars and requires the construction of charging stations for these vehicles.
Action: Signed
* Just one more complication for candidates that may have been cleared up…
Bill No.: HB 2716
An Act Concerning: Local Government
Prohibits the nomination of a political party candidate if the township clerk is not properly notified of the caucus time and location.
Action: Signed
* I haven’t seen any coverage of this at all…
Bill No.: HB 2753
An Act Concerning: Energy
Authorizes the Illinois Department of Natural Resources to lease lands on the bed of Lake Michigan for offshore wind energy development and to create and implement a regulatory program.
Action: Signed
* Hmmm…
Bill No.: HB 2787
An Act Concerning: Children
Establishes procedures for the review of unfounded reports to Illinois Department of Children and Family Services and provides new rights to children in review process.
Action: Signed
* Some subscribers will be interested in this one…
Bill No.: HB 2943
An Act Concerning: Government
Closes loopholes in the Lobbyist Registration Act.
Action: Signed
Effective: Jan. 1, 2014
From the synopsis…
Requires a registrant whose client is another registrant to disclose the name and address of the ultimate beneficiary of the registrant’s services. Requires a registrant whose client is another registrant to include in expenditure reports the name and address of the ultimate beneficiary of the expenditure.
* This will help with transparency…
Bill No.: HB 2947
An Act Concerning: State Government
Requires certain data to be included in the Governor’s introduced budget.
Action: Signed
Effective: Jan. 1, 2014
The bill is here.
* Taggers beware…
Bill No.: HB 3043
An Act Concerning: Criminal Law
Increases the penalties for criminal defacement of property.
Action: Signed
Effective: Immediately
* Common sense…
Bill No.: HB 3128
An Act Concerning: Civil Law
Allows the termination of parental rights of the father of the child if the mother conceives the child as a result of rape.
Action: Signed
Effective: Jan. 1, 2014
* Butts….
Bill No.: HB 3243
An Act Concerning: Safety
Defines discarded or unused cigarettes as “litter.”
Action: Signed
Effective: Jan. 1, 2014
* Pass on the right…
Bill No.: HB 3367
An Act Concerning: Transportation
Clarifies the law to provide that bicyclists have authority to pass on the right side of a vehicle.
Action: Signed
Effective: Immediately
* Good idea…
Bill No.: SB 2182
An Act Concerning: Local Government
Amends Comptroller’s tax incremental financing reporting to include school districts and to expand municipal reporting requirements.
Action: Signed
Effective: Immediately.
The full list is here.
24 Comments
|
*** UPDATED x1 *** Question of the day
Monday, Aug 19, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
*** UPDATE *** He signed the bill into law.
[ *** End Of Update *** ]
* Action is expected today, so let’s get started on the voting…
Gov. Pat Quinn is due to make a decision on a law that would increase the state speed limit.
The legislation would raise the speed limit on rural interstates in Illinois from 65 to 70 mph starting in January. Eight counties in the congested Chicago area would be allowed to keep their limits lower.
However, the Illinois State Police and Quinn’s transportation chief are opposed, saying current speed limits should be enforced more strictly. The governor hasn’t indicated which way he’ll go.
Thirty other states have higher speed limits than Illinois. The bill is here.
* The Question: Should Gov. Quinn sign this bill? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please.
survey tools
59 Comments
|
In other slating news…
Monday, Aug 19, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* You may not have noticed, but the Cook County Democrats slated Mike Frerichs for state treasurer last week…
Down ballot, Frerichs, in his seventh year as a state lawmaker, found his anticipated endorsement challenged by Ervin, a West Side alderman. Frerichs narrowly got the backing of a subcommittee charged to recommend candidates to the full panel of slatemakers, though many African-American committeemen, including Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle, initially backed Ervin.
“I feel confident that the Democratic Party is going to present a slate that has ethnic, gender, racial and geographical diversity,” said Frerichs, who noted the contenders for governor have yet to pick their running mates under a new state law that requires them to run as a team in the March 2014 primary.
* And Mark Brown looked at judicial slating…
What’s especially strange is that the partisan pandering is expected even though most would tell you the selections have been made in advance.
“By the time they come here, the cake has been sliced,” said one Northwest Side committeeman. Practically proving the point, neither Ald. Ed Burke (14th) nor House Speaker Mike Madigan, the most powerful voices in picking judges, were even in attendance, although their imprint was evident.
Earlier, as candidates for Appellate Court justice were making their cases, one committeeman sidled up to complain: “It’s all pre-determined.”
When I pressed him for the pre-determined picks, he got skittish. But another laid it out.
“Freddrenna Lyle, David Ellis, John Simon,” he predicted and was proven correct soon afterward.
Lyle has been a judge for less than two years, but she is the former 6th Ward alderman and still popular with her City Council colleagues, many of whom are committeemen.
Ellis hasn’t been a judge at all, but for many years he was the chief legal counsel to Speaker Madigan, the state party chairman. In that capacity, Ellis prosecuted Gov. Rod Blagojevich at his impeachment trial. Madigan’s support made Ellis a shoo-in. Ellis also is a very successful writer of mystery and suspense novels, which he said he expects to continue in his spare time.
Although already serving as an appointed justice, Simon was a somewhat less obvious selection, only in that for many years he was a favored recipient of Republican pinstripe patronage legal work. His father, Seymour Simon, was the Democratic state Supreme Court justice who won the everlasting appreciation of the state GOP by siding with Gov. Jim Thompson in his 1982 recount battle with Democrat Adlai Stevenson III.
* Frerichs, by the way, provided a lot of red meat at the fairgrounds last week…
“He’s that guy standing on his head,” Frerichs said, referring to commercials in which Rauner at first appears upside-down, saying he’ll put things right in Illinois.
“I think a little too much blood has rushed to his head if he thinks that the people of the state of Illinois are going to elect a Scott Walker clone who’s going to try to make this a right-to-work state,” Frerichs said.
Walker is the Republican governor of Wisconsin, and Rauner has said local governments should be able to implement right-to-work laws that would allow people to refuse to join union bargaining units or pay dues at their workplaces.
Frerichs used the “fabulously wealthy” Rauner as an example when recalling one of his grandfather’s sayings: “If you want to live like a Republican, you’ve got to vote for Democrats.”
Rauner spokesman Mike Schrimpf responded later that such talk is “not surprising coming from a leading member of the Democrats’ tax hike caucus. Bruce is focused on economic policies that actually encourage job creation so Illinois will no longer have the highest unemployment rate in the Midwest.”
* And from Frerichs’ Facebook page, a photo with a Lincoln impersonator…
Caption?
18 Comments
|
Two gun bills signed into law
Monday, Aug 19, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Gov. Pat Quinn signed two new gun-related bills into law over the weekend…
Starting immediately, gun owners whose weapons are lost or stolen will have 72 hours to notify police. And beginning Jan. 1, individual gun owners will have to contact the Illinois State Police before selling a weapon or transferring ownership to ensure that the purchaser is allowed to have a gun.
Quinn said the legislation closes a loophole in the state’s gun laws, which previously required gun show merchants and licensed firearms dealers — but not private sellers — to check that the customer had a valid firearm owner’s identification card. Under the new law, private sellers must contact state police, who will then search records and determine the prospective buyer’s eligibility.
According to the governor’s office, Illinois joins seven other states and the District of Columbia in requiring gun owners report missing firearms to law enforcement.
* These seem like common sense laws. But Quinn’s bill signing took place just 7 miles from the Indiana border. Will the new background check law drive even more sales to the Hoosier State?…
“It’s really important that we have a federal” measure that would monitor guns nationwide, Quinn said, “but you’ve got to start somewhere.”
Your thoughts? Notice I wrote “your thoughts.” Try very hard to avoid bumper sticker slogans in comments.
46 Comments
|
Two mobile phone bills signed into law
Monday, Aug 19, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The summary…
House Bill 1247 prohibits the operation of a motor vehicle on any road in Illinois while using a mobile phone or other electronic communication device. The bill makes exceptions for hands-free devices, including those with headsets that can initiate a call using a single button or a voice command. The new law takes effect January 1, 2014.
“When people get behind the wheel, they have a responsibility to themselves and to others to drive safely,” State Representative John D’Amico (D-Chicago), a co-sponsor of the bill, said. “When motorists are on the phone, they are not giving their full attention to the most important task they have. This law will help reduce traffic accidents and make Illinois roads safer.”
House Bill 2585 increases the penalties that can be imposed on drivers whose use of an electronic device while driving causes an accident. If the accident causes great bodily harm, the driver can be sentenced to up to 1 year in prison, and a fatal accident can result in a prison sentence of 1 to 3 years. Current law only allows these drivers to be charged with traffic violations. The new law takes effect January 1, 2014.
“Distracted driving is not only dangerous—it’s deadly,” Governor Quinn said in a press release. “Too many Illinois families have suffered because of accidents that could have been prevented. Anyone driving a car should be careful, responsive, and alert behind the wheel. These new laws will save lives.”
* More…
Drivers involved in injury-causing accidents could face up to a year in prison
“If somebody was in a school zone talking on a cell phone and they ran someone over, and if they hurt them severely or killed them, they’d get written up for a $200 ticket. That’s it,” said state Rep. Natalie Manley (D-Joliet), the bill’s chief House sponsor.
“We’ve seen more horrific things by people distracted by video devices or cell phones, and the penalties on the books for those crimes are no more than a petty offense. It’s like their tail lights are out,” she said. “The main goal is public safety, and at the end of the day that’s what we really want.”
* But…
Despite the growing push to require drivers to put their phones on speaker or use a headset, researchers at the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety have found little difference between drivers who use hand-held cell phones and those who use hands-free devices.
Rather, researchers contend that all cell phone use is equally distracting once a conversation starts, noting that accident rates did not change in other states that have implemented bans on hand-held phones behind the wheel.
Discuss.
31 Comments
|
Dillard lashes out at Gidwitz
Monday, Aug 19, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Sen. Kirk Dillard sounds a bit peevish about the defection of Ron Gidwitz to Bruce Rauner’s campaign. Gidwitz was Dillard’s campaign chairman in 2010…
“(Gidwitz) is a Chicago multimillionaire with strong ties to city hall, like Mr. Rauner, the billionaire that he’s for. So it’s not a surprise and they are both social moderates,” Dillard said. […]
Dillard adds that he’s learned from his mistakes of his 2010 campaign for governor. The Hinsdale Republican says he started that campaign too late.
Dillard has moved hard to the right since losing that ‘10 primary to Bill Brady and it shows in that quote. But his campaign committees have filed just three A-1’s this month for a total of only $18,500. He’s been hurt by the defection and, once again, he waited too long to start working.
* The AP looks at the rich people lining up behind Rauner…
Rauner is a billionaire who — at least financially speaking — doesn’t need the help, and money doesn’t always decide Illinois primary races. But if the pattern holds, it could make it difficult for his opponents — state Sens. Bill Brady and Kirk Dillard and Treasurer Dan Rutherford — to fight back with television advertising, mailers or fly-around events, particularly in crucial weeks before the March primary election.
“That’s going to be their problem, I believe,” said Ron Gidwitz, a former Illinois Republican party chairman and gubernatorial candidate who’s serving as Rauner’s finance chairman. […]
“There’s a certain time in which (known candidates) have to say ‘I’ve tried often enough, it’s time to step back,’” said Elizabeth Christie, a retired executive and one of the biggest donors to the state GOP who gave $20,000 to Brady’s 2010 bid and is now a chairwoman of Rauner’s campaign. “I believe a lot of donors are saying it’s time … and I think you’re seeing that in the numbers.” […]
Rauner’s numbers were boosted by a who’s who of GOP donors — including at least half of more than a dozen individuals who regularly help bankroll GOP campaigns in Illinois, according to an Associated Press review of campaign finance data. The group includes Citadel CEO Ken Griffin and hedge fund manager Anne Dias Griffin — who gave a combined $450,000 to Brady’s failed 2010 gubernatorial bid — and a trio of contributors who accounted for almost one-fifth of the money Dillard received during that year’s primary.
* And the Sun-Times wrote about a subscribers-only poll last week, so here it is…
The field of Republican candidates for the governorship still has no clear-cut frontrunner, though Brady is in the lead, according to a Capitol Fax poll of 1,102 likely Republican primary voters released this week. […]
Brady had 21 percent of those surveyed, compared to 17 percent for Rutherford, 14 percent for Rauner and 10 percent for Dillard.
26 Comments
|
*** UPDATED x1 *** “A bit of an insult”
Monday, Aug 19, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Without offering up any actual evidence, other than black people will likely vote for Sen. Kwame Raoul instead of Gov. Pat Quinn if Raoul runs for governor and the lack of a finished product from Raoul’s pension reform committee, Laura Washington writes…
Now the consultants and operatives are whispering in Raoul’s ear, and telling him what he wants to hear.
You can do it! They urge: You are a black legislator who occupies the state Senate seat once held by Barack Obama. You are respected by Chicago’s black leadership and progressive activists. You’re a WTTW regular, gee whiz!
You are smooth and suave, you’ve got a 1,000-watt smile, they coo. You can raise bucks and show off your policy resume, they wheedle. You can drum up enthusiasm among black voters in Cook County and downstate. Geez, you even have a funny name. Look where that got Obama?
Where will it get Raoul?
Two words: stalking horse. […]
Raoul can’t win, but he could be a spoiler.
That’s the role Bill Daley and Co. are praying he’ll play.
* Sneed piles on…
The Kwame corner. . .
The big question: Will State Sen. Kwame Raoul, who replaced now-President Barack Obama in the state senate, run for governor in the Dem primary and split the vote by siphoning off the African-American and Hispanic votes?
◆ Here’s the deal: If Raoul does run, it’s because he got the green light from his boss, powerful Senate President John Cullerton, who is no fan of Gov. Pat Quinn.
* First of all, as subscribers already know, the polling shows that Democrats aren’t just hungry for another candidate to run, they’re practically starving for it. From an August 12th, Capitol Fax/We Ask America poll of 1,536 likely Democratic primary voters…
Currently, two Democrats have declared their candidacy for governor: Former White House Chief of Staff William Daley and current governor Pat Quinn. We’d like to know whether or not you’re satisfied with your choices, or if you’d prefer additional choices on the ballot.
Satisfied 43.25%
Not satisfied 47.50%
Not sure 9.25%
So, a strong majority is either dissatisfied with their choices or aren’t sure. The voters clearly want somebody else.
*** UPDATE *** I forgot to mention that the poll found 57 percent of African-American Democrats were dissatisfied with their choices and another 12 percent were unsure. Just 31 percent were satisfied with their current choices. Whites were split 45-45.
[ *** End Of Update *** ]
* Also, both columnists may have forgotten that Cook County ain’t everything. Quinn is despised in Downstate and Daley isn’t trusted there. A Downstate running mate for Raoul as well as assistance from his fellow state Senators could help him put together the plurality needed to win.
And it’s not just Downstaters. Sen. Daniel Biss brought Raoul into his Evanston-based district for a forum earlier this month…
Raoul said the governor has the “luxury” to act “ignorant of the negotiations that took place in the months prior to the amendatory veto and come in and say, ‘If I had a chance to partake in it, I would have done this.’”
“Well you did have a chance to partake in it, and you did partake in it, and those things fell,” Raoul noted.
He’ll be getting that sort of help from lots of his colleagues all over the state should he decide to run.
* Next, what does a stalking horse look like? A good example would be Roland Burris, 2002. He received one big contribution, hardly campaigned at all, and siphoned enough black votes away from Paul Vallas to allow Rod Blagojevich to win. If Raoul runs a non-credible race, then, yeah, he’s little more than a stalking horse. So far, at least, he doesn’t appear to be doing so from this vantage point.
In any event, don’t you think you’d have to look at the campaign he puts together before you decide he’s essentially just shilling for Daley? C’mon.
* Raoul’s response…
Raoul said he was offended that Sun-Times columnist Laura Washington suggested his running for governor would help challenger Bill Daley, by undermining Quinn’s support among black voters.
“The notion that I would be characterized as a spoiler — it’s a bit of an insult,” he said.
* And, yes, Cullerton is working hard for Raoul, but it’s not up to him to give Raoul a final “green light.”
* By the way, Raoul also told the Sun-Times that he would be deciding on a run in the next ten days…
“I give myself 10 days or so to make up my mind,” Raoul said. “This is something that’s spiraling out of my control. I don’t think it does the party or the state any good to let it linger very long.” […]
Raoul’s remarks came at a South Side park where Quinn signed a new gun-safety law that Raoul sponsored. At a news conference, the governor said Raoul did more than anyone to win the measure’s approval.
When asked in an interview to rate Quinn’s record in office, Raoul replied, “I think the governor came into office under very challenging circumstances . . . He shouldn’t get all the credit. He shouldn’t get all the blame.”
* And, finally, a trip down memory lane. Washington once wrote this about then Senate President Emil Jones’ remarks regarding another Hyde Park Democrat…
African-American leadership, Jones says, must get past “the crabs in a barrel syndrome. Every time one of us pulls up, we want to pull him down.”
41 Comments
|
Serious problems ahead
Monday, Aug 19, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* My weekly syndicated newspaper column…
I had heard that Republican gubernatorial candidate Bruce Rauner’s longtime personal and business connections to Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel were “killer” issues among GOP primary voters, so I decided to commission a poll.
The question I settled on is pretty mild in comparison to what could be used in a TV ad, so the response may turn out to be even worse than the Capitol Fax/We Ask America poll shows, if that’s possible.
“Would you be more likely or less likely to vote for a candidate for governor if you found out he was a friend and political ally to Chicago Democratic Mayor Rahm Emanuel?” 1,102 likely Republican primary voters were asked on August 13th.
A truly astounding 83 percent of Republicans said they’d be less likely to support that candidate. Any time you see a “less likely” response above 80 percent, you can pretty much figure that the target is toast. But maybe not in this case.
The Rauner people have long known that this was a real problem for their guy, which is just one reason why they’ve been spending so much money this summer - almost $2 million on TV and radio ads through the first week of August, according to one calculation.
And the ties go deeper than the question reveals. Rauner helped Emanuel get his start in business, advising him to become an investment banker after leaving Bill Clinton’s White House and then retaining his firm. Their relationship made Emanuel a wealthy man, so the advertising possibilities are juicy, to say the least.
The problem is that nobody has yet laid a glove on the man. The other candidates either don’t have the money to go up on TV (Kirk Dillard and Bill Brady), or they’re husbanding their resources for the home stretch (Dan Rutherford).
There’s also a timing question that’s been debated by at least some campaigns. Attack Rauner too soon and he could have time to recover. He has the resources and infrastructure to weather a storm over a long haul. Attack him too late and it might not have enough of an impact, or the other candidates themselves might already be too damaged to do him any harm or may even be out of the race. Opposition research is starting to circulate behind the scenes, and let’s just say that some of it ain’t good at all.
And nobody needs an opposition research firm to figure out where state Sen. Kirk Dillard’s main weakness is in the governor’s race.
Rauner has attempted to make this a “change” election in order to avoid the usual Republican primary habit of picking the guy who appears to be owed the next turn at the wheel. Dillard has been in Illinois politics forever, which will work against him if Rauner succeeds in changing the tone. But the state Senator and former Jim Edgar chief of staff also has another well-known problem that looks to be just as much of a killer issue as Rauner’s Rahm situation.
Dillard often worked with Barack Obama in the Illinois Senate and he cut a now infamous TV ad for his former colleague during the 2008 presidential primary season.
“Would you be more likely or less likely to vote for a candidate if he had appeared in a TV commercial for Barack Obama before he was elected president?” the likely Republican primary voters were asked in the poll.
The “less likely” response was an astounding 82 percent.
“Dillard faced thousands of gross rating points driving the Obama TV ad message against him in 2010 and lost by only 193 votes,” pollster Gregg Durham said last week. “Nothing is impossible in Illinois politics.”
That’s true, but the Obama ad tanked Dillard’s 2010 primary campaign, which he barely lost to state Sen. Bill Brady. This year, he has lagged badly in fundraising and in the polls.
Dillard has two things in his favor.
The first is traditional Republican thinking. Dillard narrowly lost the 2010 primary and would’ve likely done better than Bill Brady in the fall campaign against Pat Quinn, so it could be “his turn.”
The second is Jim Edgar, a former governor who is still quite popular among Republicans. Dillard can barely open his mouth without mentioning Edgar and the former governor will likely appear in ads.
Whether any of that is enough to overcome the Obama ad problem is now the biggest question for Dillard.
Bill Brady’s vote for drivers licenses for illegal aliens and Dan Rutherford’s vote for civil unions will also be tested soon.
Discuss.
38 Comments
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...
 
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
   
|
Hosted by MCS |
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax |
Advertise Here |
Mobile Version |
Contact Rich Miller
|
