* Somebody brought up this very same point over drinks last night…

Unions contend that Rauner is deliberately choking their resources in an attempt to weaken their position as they head into negotiations for a new employment contract, which is supposed to take effect July 1.

The Illinois AFL-CIO is the lead plaintiff in most of the cases, so they’re handling the money end. But AFSCME is named in the governor’s federal case and it has long had the Chicago firm of Cornfield & Feldman on retainer. They’re probably not cheap.

But an AFSCME spokesman avoided talking about short-term union finances today and focused instead on the long term, saying, in part, “The array of Rauner attacks seems clearly intended to wipe out the labor movement in Illinois, and not just in the public sector… Everybody understands what this is really about.”

* Meanwhile, the Illinois Policy Institute has become an issue in a Chicago aldermanic race. From a press release…

Alderman Mary O’Connor of the 41st Ward called on her opponent Anthony Napolitano to return campaign contributions from a right-wing, “dark money” organization with ties to the Illinois Policy Institute. Today, the Liberty Justice Center, an IPI backed law firm, filed a motion in court to bust unions in Illinois through the denial of collecting “fair share” dues. Napolitano has received thousands of dollars from the IPI’s sister organization, the Illinois Opportunity Project.

“41st ward families are sick and tired of the never-ending assault on unions who give working people a collective voice, and they deserve better than a candidate who takes money from the right-wing organizations pushing that very agenda. Anthony should immediately return the money he received from the extremist groups supporting his campaign, and denounce their union-busting efforts. They have no place in the 41st ward,” said O’Connor.

O’Connor, who was endorsed by the Chicago Federation of Labor, has fought for working people as Alderman the past four years in office through policies such as water and sewer reconstruction, a program that has put numerous union members to work rebuilding Chicago’s aging infrastructure. Her efforts have earned her the support of 9 labor organizations in her campaign for reelection.

Napolitano has taken thousands of dollars from organizations tied to the anti-union efforts of the Illinois Policy Institute and the Rauner administration.

* The totals aren’t much, just $3k from the Policy Institute’s political arm and $1k from the 43rd Ward GOP…

43rd Ward Republican Committeeman Chris Cleveland: “If Bruce Wins This Election, Then We Republicans Will Have a Mandate, A Very Big One, To Take on the Unions.” According to post by Chris Cleveland on 43rdwardrepublicans.com, “Bruce Rauner has made standing up to government unions the centerpiece of his campaign. He’ll follow through on it. And that, in my opinion, makes him the right choice for governor. I like Bill Brady, really I do. But now, a week out, neither he nor Dan Rutherford are serious contenders for the nomination. It’s time to make a choice, Rauner or Dillard. It’s an easy one. If Bruce wins this election, then we Republicans will have a mandate, a very big one, to take on the unions. We can go after them on the pension problem they created. We can go after them on failing schools. We can go after them on wild overspending. We can go after them on corruption. Imagine having a mandate, here in Illinois, to do what Scott Walker did in Wisconsin. Bruce will have it. The Rauner campaign didn’t write this. I did. And I mean it. Seriously, if you haven’t yet voted, please vote for Bruce Rauner. It’s time.”

* Despite that, Napolitano is getting even bigger bucks from firefighters and police unions.

The New York Times had an interesting story the other day about this very topic…

In recent weeks, Gov. Bruce Rauner of Illinois has traveled the state promoting his proposal for more than $2 billion in cuts to pensions for public employees. All public employees, that is, except police officers and firefighters.

“Those who put their lives on the line in service to our state deserve to be treated differently,” Mr. Rauner said in his February budget address to the state legislature.

By announcing the exemption, Mr. Rauner was following the lead of other Republican governors in the Midwest who have imposed unwelcome changes on state and local employees in the name of saving money and improving services.

In 2011, Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin introduced a bill that would roll back collective bargaining rights for government workers and require them to contribute more toward their own pensions and health coverage. He excluded police officers and firefighters from the legislation, known as Act 10, which he signed the following month.

On the state level, the first responder unions are not falling for the rhetoric. But this Chicago thing is an interesting little twist.

*** UPDATE *** With a hat tip to a commenter…

Rauner told WAND’s Doug Wolfe on Monday cities can offset the losses if a series of his reforms are enacted by the Illinois legislature. Among those would be giving municipalities more control over negotiating with police and fire unions. And, giving cities more control over police and fire pensions.

“If local governments can control what gets collectively bargained, who has to join a union or not in the local government, that frees up a significant amount of money as well,” Rauner stated. “They (police & fire) work for the local taxpayers, the local citizens. And there should be more control, local control of those pension issues.”

The commenter notes…

So just like right to work, he isn’t for it, but leave it up to someone else to do the dirty work.