|
*** UPDATED x1 *** Will the remap proposal survive the test?
Friday, Jan 17, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller * I asked Michael Kolenc, the campaign manager for “Yes for Independent Maps” to explain to me why he thinks his coalition’s push to put a remap constitutional amendment on the ballot will survive a key constitutional test. You can find an explanation for what the amendment actually does by clicking here. The group raised $487K in the fourth quarter (from some heavy hitters like Lester Crown, Ken and Anne Griffin, Jerry Reinsdorf, the IMA, the Chamber, etc.), spent $328K and had $202K in the bank. * Anyway, the Illinois Supreme Court has ruled that citizen petitioners who want to amend the Constitution must confine themselves solely to issues that change both the structure and procedure of the General Assembly. So, with that in mind, here’s Kolenc’s explanation…
It was helpful to me, and it makes sense. Your take? *** UPDATE *** Many thanks to a commenter for pointing out perhaps the oddest argument ever on the need to reform the remap process. It’s in the Tribune, of course…
How does partisan remapping impact primaries? Yes, incumbents can pick and choose what voters they represent, but that doesn’t really stop anybody in their own party from challenging them in a primary, does it? If you want to claim that the remap process is unfair to the minority party in general elections, OK. The courts say this is fine by them, but whatever. Make your partisan case. But primaries?
|
|
*** UPDATED x3 - Complicated - E-Mail suggests it’s true - DOC claims Dillard gun allegation false *** Two Dillard press releases
Friday, Jan 17, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller * Press release number one…
* Press release number two…
Discuss. *** UPDATE *** A Department of Corrections spokesman says the Dillard press release is untrue. McCraven was not issued a firearm by DOC, the spokesman said. He wasn’t authorized to have one by the state agency, either. Ready, fire aim? *** UPDATE 2 *** An e-mail from DOC’s chief of staff sure seems to indicate that Dillard’s claim is true… ![]() *** UPDATE 2 *** According to DOC, the e-mail refers to a five-week inter-agency detail in 2011. He was issued a gun and a badge at that time. But then a background check was done and the detail was terminated. The second job was a “non-sensitive” job. CMS apparently told DOC that they had an employee who needed to be placed due to a grievance process win and asked if they had a spot and he was given one that didn’t include a gun or a badge and where he had no access to confidential or classified info, etc.. He didn’t have a gun during that six-month period. Sorry for the initial confusion.
|
|
*** UPDATED x2 - Frerichs doing it, too - Clear Violation *** Why is Rauner hiding staff salaries?
Friday, Jan 17, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller * Bruce Rauner has been paying most of his campaign staff through a payroll service named Paylocity. Illinois Review took a look…
The Democratic Party of Evanston also used Paylocity as recently as a year ago. But this is an odd, and possibly illegal way of doing business. * Steve Shearer, who has formed a PAC to go negative on Rauner in the GOP primary, sent out this statement…
*** UPDATE 1 *** This is a clear violation of the statute…
*** UPDATE 2 *** State treasurer candidate Mike Frerichs appears to be doing the same thing. Naughty, naughty. * Related…
|
| « NEWER POSTS | PREVIOUS POSTS » |








